Article

The penholder system and the rule of law in the Security Council decision-making: Setback or improvement?

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the author.

Abstract

This article analyses the decision-making process of the UN Security Council when it adopts outcome documents, such as resolutions, Presidential statements and press statements. It is commonly assumed that because of their veto power and permanency China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States have greater influence than their elected counterparts in shaping those outcomes. In recent years, that control has been strengthened by the penholdership system. Under this practice, one or more members, usually France, the United States or the United Kingdom (P3), take leadership over a situation on the agenda of the Council. When ‘holding the pen’ a member often decides what action the Council should take, then drafts an outcome document that it negotiates with other permanent members before sharing the text with elected members. This article explores the development of this practice and its impact on the respect for the rule of law in the Security Council’s decision-making process. It argues that, while concentrating power in the hands of the P3, hence diminishing transparency and the opportunity for all members to participate in the decision-making of the Council, at the same time the penholdership system also provides an avenue to strengthen elected members’ influence in ways that promote respect for the international rule of law.

No full-text available

Request Full-text Paper PDF

To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the author.

... It refers to a practice of continuous, individual or collective, leadership in the Council of particular members on specific issues on the Council's agenda (Sievers and Daws 2014). It means that the member 'holding the pen' assumes responsibility for a given issue and initiates all actions by the Council related to that issue, including drafting documents, chairing negotiations, holding emergency meetings, scheduling open debates and organising visiting missions (Loiselle 2020). In practice, the so-called P3, namely France, the UK and the US, are sole penholders on most country-specific items on the Council's agenda (Martin 2020). ...
... In practice, the so-called P3, namely France, the UK and the US, are sole penholders on most country-specific items on the Council's agenda (Martin 2020). In light of this, it is often claimed that this arrangement substantially hinders the ability of the E10 to influence the Council's decision-making (Loiselle 2020). ...
Article
Full-text available
The cases of Poland’s 2018-2019 and South Africa’s 2019-2020 terms as elected members (E10) of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) can be used to confront the well-known claim that due to a prevailing democratic, legitimacy or efficiency deficit(s) in the structure and/or working methods of the Council, there is no significant space for the E10 members to be influential. By examining these two representative cases, the E10’s capacity to exert such influence can indeed be detected on multiple levels, which highlights the numerous channels and practices available to the elected members to act as veritable norm entrepreneurs at this most prominent institution of global governance.
... The E10 have increasingly been linked to penholding, sometimes in collaboration with the P5 (Gregory, 2023;Loiselle, 2020), or for new items on the agenda, such as climate change. ...
Article
The Venezuelan participation in the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) in 2015 and 2016 was expected to be a challenge for the institution, as the Maduro government adopted controversial positions at the General Assembly (UNGA). However, Venezuela contestation line did not appear clearly at the UNSC. Drawing upon an in-depth qualitative study, Erving Goffman's work, and literature on contestation in international organisations (IOs), we interpret this apparent inconsistency from the concept of interaction order. We argue that the UNGA and the UNSC each constitutes a specific interaction order that influences the way contestation practices are channelled. The contestation practices Venezuelan representatives set up at the UNGA hardly work during the UNSC official sessions, where they adapt their practices to its interaction order. Venezuelan representatives also use informal and backstage actions to express their dissent, without avoiding being called into order. Venezuela's moderation at the UNSC results from an invisibilisation of contestation by interaction practices.
Chapter
In recent years, in order to strengthen the supervision of coal mine safety production, the Chinese government has formulated and promulgated a series of laws and regulations. At the same time, it has strengthened safety management and increased investment in coal mine safety, which also reflects that coal enterprises are gradually paying attention to safety production. The purpose of this paper is to study the coal mine safety risk intelligent management and control and information decision analysis system. This article is to build a safety production early warning system, analyze the risk sources of safety production in different time and space and environmental dimensions, cut the coal mine production system into independent evaluation elements, and overcome the natural environment and the variability, complexity and complexity of the natural environment and risk factors faced by coal mine production. Based on the network evaluation elements, the main factors of coal mine safety production risk are summarized, combined with qualitative and quantitative methods to determine the weights, and the coal mine safety production risk evaluation index system is constructed. This article has tested the system three times and found that the test result is consistent with the actual situation on site.
Chapter
Several UN documents have identified climate trends as a security concern in recent years. A remarkable development can be seen in the incorporation by the UN of the climate change issue within its security dimension, through the unanimous adoption of recent UNSC resolutions. But what is the extent of the UNSC commitment to address intercommunal conflicts exacerbated by climate related effects in the Sahel region? What are the legal and practical implications of the UNSC recommendations for the UN and its subsidiary bodies in areas characterized by generalized State weaknesses and weak enforcement of the rule of law? Has the UNSC really succeeded in ensuring an adequate integrated approach to multidimensional threats in the Sahel? The present contribution tries to answer these questions by analyzing selected provisions of UNSC Resolution 2423 (2018), concerning the situation in Mali, and their implementation. In a tentative conclusion, a few reflections will be developed on the possible impact of the UNSC approach to climate security threats in the Sahel on the evolution of the UN system of collective security: new wine in old bottles or a first step towards a change in the overall security architecture of the Organization?
Article
Full-text available
The rule of law is almost universally supported at the national and international level. The extraordinary support for the rule of law in theory, however, is possible only because of widely divergent views of what it means in practice. Disparate national traditions posed few problems while operating in parallel, but efforts to promote the rule of law through international organizations have necessitated a reassessment of this pluralism. This article proposes a core definition of the rule of law as a political ideal and argues that its applicability to the international level will depend on that ideal being seen as a means rather than an end, as serving a function rather than defining a status. Such a vision of the rule of law more accurately reflects the development of the rule of law in national jurisdictions and appropriately highlights the political work that must be done if power is to be channeled through law.
Article
The United Nations Security Council is often described as an opaque body, closed in both membership and approach, and unaccountable for its conduct. For many years, this view has motivated calls for reform to the Council's working methods. This article aims to shine light on the Council's approach to process matters, recognizing the Council's preference for making change through developments in practice. The article reviews the efforts undertaken by the ‘Small Five’ group of States from 2005 to 2012, followed by the efforts since 2013 of the Accountability, Coherence and Transparency Group, while also acknowledging the contributions made by Japan. With some proposals having received some degree of Council support, the sustained implementation of change is identified as the key priority. The article argues for the contextual application of the key concepts of transparency, engagement and accountability, as well as prevention, to provide a principled basis for both the maintenance and development of working methods reform.
Article
The institutional procedures for the UN's decision-making on issues of global peace and security, first and foremost the Security Council (SC), were conceived with the objective of enabling a swift but internationally coordinated response to irregular situations of crises. Today, however, the UN is constantly involved in situations of conflict and has expanded its range of activities. This book offers a concrete and practically applicable answer to the question of how to reform the UN and increase the legitimacy of the UN's decision-making procedures on issues of global peace and security. In order to provide this answer, it connects the minutia of institutional design with the abstract principals of democratic theory in a systematic and reproducible method, thereby enabling a clear normative evaluation of even the smallest technical detail of reform. This evaluation demonstrates that there is a range of feasible proposals for reform that could improve the SC's accountability both to the General Assembly and to the general public, that could increase the opportunities for effective input from the UN membership and NGOs. This book will be of interest to students and scholars of the United Nations, International Organizations and regional governance.
A Crowded Field: Groups of Friends, the United Nations and the Resolution of Conflict
  • T Whitfield
Use of Force, Rule-of-law Restraints, and Process: Unfinished Business for the Responsibility to Protect Concept
  • J Harrington
Dis)unity in the UN Security Council: Voting Patterns in the UN’s Peace and Security Organ
  • P M Romita
The UN Security Council in an Age of Great Power Rivalry
  • S V Einsiedel
The Resolution being considered at the United Nations Security Council regarding Israel should be vetoed…
  • B Netanyahu
Provisional Rules of Procedure, supra note 18
  • U N Charter