- A preview of this full-text is provided by Wiley.
- Learn more
Preview content only
Content available from Ecology Letters
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
LETTER Climate drives community-wide divergence within species over
a limited spatial scale: evidence from an oceanic island
Antonia Salces-Castellano,
1,2†
Jairo Pati~
no,
1,3†
Nadir Alvarez,
4
Carmelo And
ujar,
1
Paula Arribas,
1
Juan Jos
e Braojos-Ruiz,
5
Marcelino del Arco-Aguilar,
3
V
ıctor Garc
ıa-Olivares,
1,2
Dirk N. Karger,
6
Heriberto L
opez,
1
Ioanna Manolopoulou,
7
Pedro Orom
ı,
8
Antonio
J. P
erez-Delgado,
1,2
William E. Peterman,
9
Kenneth F. Rijsdijk
10
and
Brent C. Emerson
1
*
Abstract
Geographic isolation substantially contributes to species endemism on oceanic islands when speci-
ation involves the colonisation of a new island. However, less is understood about the drivers of
speciation within islands. What is lacking is a general understanding of the geographic scale of
gene flow limitation within islands, and thus the spatial scale and drivers of geographical specia-
tion within insular contexts. Using a community of beetle species, we show that when dispersal
ability and climate tolerance are restricted, microclimatic variation over distances of only a few
kilometres can maintain strong geographic isolation extending back several millions of years. Fur-
ther to this, we demonstrate congruent diversification with gene flow across species, mediated by
Quaternary climate oscillations that have facilitated a dynamic of isolation and secondary contact.
The unprecedented scale of parallel species responses to a common environmental driver for evo-
lutionary change has profound consequences for understanding past and future species responses
to climate variation.
Keywords
Arthropod, beetle, climate, dispersal, gene flow, Quaternary, speciation, topography.
Ecology Letters (2020) 23: 305–315
INTRODUCTION
Islands are often viewed as theatres for adaptive evolutionary
change and speciation (Losos & Ricklefs 2009), where non-
adaptive paths to speciation are frequently given limited
importance, or even ignored (e.g. Cabral et al. 2019). Recent
models have sought to understand how geophysical island
attributes influence insular biodiversity through the regulation
of colonisation, speciation and extinction (e.g. Whittaker
et al. 2008; Fern
andez-Palacios et al. 2016; Lim & Marshall
2017). Although such models have sought to account for both
long-term island ontogeny (e.g. Whittaker et al. 2008; Borre-
gaard et al. 2017) and shorter-term surface area changes (e.g.
Fern
andez-Palacios et al. 2016; Weigelt et al. 2016), insular
species themselves have received much less attention (but see
Rosindell & Harmon 2013; Rominger et al. 2016; Cabral
et al. 2019 for models incorporating species properties and
biotic interactions). While much quantitative molecular data
exists on insular speciation across archipelagos (e.g. Shaw &
Gillespie 2016), it is difficult to compare across such studies
and generalise about the drivers of speciation within islands.
This is because independent studies are idiosyncratic with
regard to geographic sampling, and tend to be taxonomically
biased toward diversified lineages. More importantly, such
studies are largely focussed on describing patterns of specia-
tion rather than the underlying processes that give rise to spe-
ciation. Despite these limitations, support has been found for
a model where there is a significant correlation between the
spatial scales of gene flow and speciation (Kisel & Barra-
clough 2010). However, the importance and mechanistic basis
of non-adaptive evolutionary pathways to speciation, where
physical disruption of gene flow initiates divergence and ulti-
mately promotes speciation, remains poorly understood.
Goodman et al. (2012) have noted that relatively rapid geo-
logical events within islands may be important drivers of
divergence and speciation, and several studies implicate the
fragmenting actions of volcanic activity (e.g. Vandergast et al.
2004) and flank collapses (e.g. Brown et al. 2006) as dispersal
1
Island Ecology and Evolution Research Group, Institute of Natural Products
and Agrobiology (IPNA-CSIC), C/Astrof
ısico Francisco S
anchez 3, La Laguna,
Tenerife, Canary Islands 38206, Spain
2
School of Doctoral and Postgraduate Studies, University of La Laguna,
38200, La Laguna, Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain
3
Plant Conservation and Biogeography Group, Department of Botany, Ecol-
ogy and Plant Physiology, University of La Laguna, C/ Astrof
ısico Francisco
S
anchez, 38206,La Laguna, Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain
4
Natural History Museum of Geneva, 1 route de Malagnou, 1208, Geneva,
Switzerland
5
Tenerife Insular Water Council (CIATF), C/ Leoncio Rodr
ıguez 2, 38003, Santa
Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
6
Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Z€
urcherstrasse 111,8903,Birmensdorf,
Switzerland
7
Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, UK
8
Department of Animal Biology, Edaphology and Geology, University of
Laguna, C/ Astrof
ısico Francisco S
anchez, 38206, La Laguna, Tenerife, Canary
Islands, Spain
9
School of Environmental and Natural Resources, The Ohio State University,
Columbus, OH, USA
10
Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam,
Amsterdam, Netherlands
*Correspondence: E-mail: bemerson@ipna.csic.es
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
©2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd/CNRS
Ecology Letters, (2020) 23: 305–315 doi: 10.1111/ele.13433