ArticlePDF Available

Mini Review Bitter Taste in Chicken and its Implication on Nutrition

Authors:
  • Afghanistan National Agricultural Science and Technology University

Figures

Content may be subject to copyright.
Copyright@ Fangxiong Shi | Biomed J Sci & Tech Res | BJSTR. MS.ID.003787. 16848
Mini Review
ISSN: 2574 -1241
Bitter Taste in Chicken and its Implication on Nutrition
Enayatullah Hamdard1, Ahmadullah Zahir1,2, Babrak Karwand3, Zhicheng Shi1 and Fangxiong Shi1*
1College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, China
2College of Food Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, China
3Faculty of Veterinary Science, Kunduz University, Afghanistan
*Corresponding author: Fangxiong Shi, College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, China
DOI: 10.26717/BJSTR.2019.22.003787
Introduction
In the animal kingdom taste perception is critical biological
mechanism for disrupting food and water intake selection prior to
its consumption. It empowers chickens to distinguish productive

       
such as toxic, poisonous and harmful compounds. For elucidating
the evolution of taste sense from birds to mammals, its crucial
        
feeding practices and clarify the sense of 5 basic tastes in chicken
respectively [1]. In chicken bitter is the most crucial biological
taste disruptor, it provokes chickens against consuming hazard and
destructive foods prior to ingestion and therefore considered as a
cautionary indicator. which tells chicken which prospective foods
are nutritious, poisonous/toxic, harmful and these taste indications

avoidance [1, 2].
The T2R is sub family of bitter taste, consisting of approximately
        
taste perception is mediated by super family of guanine nucleotide
binding regulatory protein (G-Protein) and G-Protein coupled
receptor (GPCR) family - the taste 2 receptors (T2R) and their
effectors downstream relevant proteins, although umami and sweet
tastes receptors are mediated by GPCR family taste 1 receptors
(T1R) and its respective proteins. Despite the gustatory organs,
the taste receptors and their downstream proteins have been
investigated in extra gustatory tissues in chickens and mammals,
the recently investigated organs are lungs, spleen, heart, kidneys
 
the chicken genome owing only three (3) bitter taste receptors
termed ggTas2R1, ggTas2R2 and ggTas2R7, whereas the umami
and sweet receptors are ggTas1R1 and ggTas1R3 hetrodiamter but
absence of sweet receptor ggTas1R2.
Considering the previous studies, in chicken taste buds’
development begins prenatally in variation of shape, size and
number of buds at particular area present in chicken and
completed by embryonic day 19 [5]. Despite to humans, excessive
number (69%) of chicken taste buds are positioned mainly in the
upper palate and decisive number (29%) are located in lower
palate, whereas a minor percentage (2%) are originate in the
posteroventrolateral region of the anterior tongue correspondingly
[5,6]. In comparisons to humans’ beings and other mammals, birds

Received: September 22, 2019
Published: November 08, 2019
Citation: Enayatullah Hamdard, Ahmadul-
lah Zahir, Babrak Karwand, Zhicheng
Shi, Fangxiong Shi. Bitter Taste in Chick-
en and its Implication on Nutrition. Bi-
omed J Sci & Tech Res 22(4)-2019. BJSTR.
MS.ID.003787.
Keywords: Bitter taste; Chicken; Nutrition
ARTICLE INFO Abstract
Bitter taste has evolved largely as a mechanism to identify nutritious foods and is
important for detecting nutritionally relevant food and considered as a warning signal
prior to ingestion against toxic/poisonous, harmful and toxic compounds. It has been
argued that birds have a lower taste perception compared to mammals due to their
low taste bud numbers present in their body. In chicken predicted taste genes for bitter,
sweet, umami, salt, calcium and lipids are present and preliminary data indicate that
bitter taste receptor repertoire is small in chickens, but in some bird species it’s as large
 
to the practice of poultry nutrition such as optimize the use of amino acids and fats,
phosphorus excretion and use of alternative feedstuffs manipulation of feed intake. In
conclusion, avian taste is intimately associated to nutrient sensing and consequently

Copyright@ Fangxiong Shi | Biomed J Sci & Tech Res | BJSTR. MS.ID.003787.
Volume 22- Issue 4 DOI: 10.26717/BJSTR.2019.22.003787
16849
  
        
only 3775 respectively [7]. Further, in Avian Species aforementioned
number of taste buds mostly found around salivary glands in the
soft epithelium of the palate, the base of tongue and the pharynx [8].

bitter taste in chicken and it has been addressed that chicken have
a well-developed sense of taste but only three bitter taste receptors

bitter taste receptors and their corresponding detection thresholds
is crucial for addressing the potential effects on chicken feeding
performance/behavior and desired improvement on growth
performance.
Remarkably, as mentioned earlier, the chicken genome owing
only three (3) bitter taste receptors. The presence of minimum
number of bitter taste receptors, enables the chicken a symbolic
and minimalistic model for understanding of vertebrate teste

the cost of animal feed and higher standards of livestock products,
        
       
been made to extract incredible numbers of potential additives
from natural plants, and they often display bitter taste. After the
        
it found the lowest compare to the Rhode Island Red strain with
highest number of taste buds in the broiler chickens accordingly.
         
cavity were well correlated with bitter taste sensitivity. Therefore,
its suggested that the number of taste buds is a crucial vital

maybe valuable in selecting appropriate feed stuffs for chickens
feeding [11] Table 1 and Figure 1.
Table 1: Number of Taste Buds, Family 1 (T1R) and 2 (T2R) Taste Gene Repertoire in Birds Compared to Humans and Pigs.
Scientific Name Number of Taste Buds T1R Genes Number of T2R Genes
Human (Homo sapiens) 7902 T1R1/2/3 25
Pig (Sus scrofa) 19,904 T1R1/2/3 10a
Blue Tit (Cyanistes caeruleus) 24
Chicken (Gallus Gallus) T1R1/3 3
Broiler 312 –
White Leghorn 192
Rhode Island 253
Duck (Anatidae spp.) 375
Parrot (Psittacidae spp.) 350
Pigeon (Columba livia domestica) 56
Quail (Coturnix japonica) 62
Sparrow (Zonotrichia albicollis) – 18
European starling (Sturnus vulgaris) 200
Turkey (Meleagris gallopavo) – T1R1/3a2a
 (Taeniopygia guttata) – T1R1/3a7
Figure 1: The chemical structure of GPCR and distribution anatomical origins of taste in tongue
Copyright@ Fangxiong Shi | Biomed J Sci & Tech Res | BJSTR. MS.ID.003787.
Volume 22- Issue 4 DOI: 10.26717/BJSTR.2019.22.003787
16850
Bitter Compounds Database
       
aversion is thought to protect the organism against ingestion,
which are commonly bitter. Interestingly, bitter taste receptors
expressions are not limited to the gastrointestinal tract, but it’s
also expressed in extra oral tissues, such as lungs, heart, spleen,
kidney and bursa fabricus of Chinese Fast Yellow Chicken. These
expressions demonstrating that they may expose a critical role
in digestive and metabolic processes [12-15]. Bitter DB database
includes over 550 compounds, that were reported to taste bitter
to humans, available at http://bitterdb.agri.huji.ac.il/dbbitter.
php. The intention of Bitter DB is to enable studying the chemical
features of various compounds associated with bitterness [16].
Conclusion and Future Perspectives
The avian taste system consists of a group of nutrients
sensors evolved to evaluate the nutritional quality and content of
foods. Chicken seem to be highly sensitive against bitterness and
bitterness sensitivity decreased subsequently. Therefore, a sense
of tasting play potential role in nutrient sensing and accepting
  
         
window for demonstration of new feedstuffs and would contribute
toward improvement of chicken innovative and alternative feeds in
poultry industries.
References
1. Yoshida Y, Kawabata Y, Kawabata F, Nishimura S, Tabata S (2015)
Expressions of multiple umami taste receptors in oral and gastrointestinal
tissues, and umami taste synergism in chickens. Biochemical and
biophysical research communications 466(3): 346-349.
2. Hamdard E, Shi Z, Lv Z, Zahir A, Wei Q, et al. (2019) Denatonium
Benzoate-Induces Oxidative Stress in the Heart and Kidney of Chinese
Fast Yellow Chickens by Regulating Apoptosis, Autophagy, Antioxidative
Activities and Bitter Taste Receptor Gene Expressions. Animals 9(9):
E701.
3. Shi P, J Zhang (2005) Contrasting modes of evolution between vertebrate
sweet/umami receptor genes and bitter receptor genes. Molecular
biology and evolution 23(2): 292-300.
4. Cheled-Shoval SL, Reicher N, Niv MY, Uni Z (2017) Detecting thresholds
for bitter, umami, and sweet tastants in broiler chicken using a 2-choice
test method. Poultry science 96(7): 2206-2218.
5. Ganchrow JR, D Ganchrow (1987) Taste bud development in chickens
(Gallus gallus domesticus). The Anatomical Record 218(1): 88-93.
6. Cheled-Shoval SL, S Druyan, Z Uni (2015) Bitter, sweet and umami taste
receptors and downstream signaling effectors: Expression in embryonic
and growing chicken gastrointestinal tract. Poultry science 94(8): 1928-
1941.
7. Cheled-Shoval S, Behrens M, Korb A, Di Pizio A, Meyerhof W, et al. (2017)
From cell to beak: In-vitro and in-vivo characterization of chicken bitter
taste thresholds. Molecules 22(5): 821.
8. Kurosawa T, Sueo Niimura, Seiji Kusuhara, Kazuo Ishida (1983)
Morphological studies of taste buds in chickens. Japanese Journal of
Zootechnical Science (Japan) 54(9): 502-510.
9. Clark L, J Hagelin, S Werner (2015) The chemical senses in birds, in
Sturkie’s avian physiology. Elsevier: 89-111.
10. Suresh G, Das RK, Kaur Brar S, Rouissi T, Avalos Ramirez A, et al. (2018)
Alternatives to antibiotics in poultry feed: molecular perspectives.
Critical reviews in microbiology 44(3): 318-335.
11. Kudo Ki, Shiraishi J, Nishimura S, Bungo T, Tabata S (2010) The number
of taste buds is related to bitter taste sensitivity in layer and broiler
chickens. Animal science journal 81(2): 240-244.
12. Meyer D, M Kare (1986) Sense organs, in Avian Physiology. Springer: 29-
52.
13.        
of zirconium diboride with boron carbide additions. Journal of the
American Ceramic Society 89(5): 1544-1550.
14. Roura E, MW Baldwin, K Klasing (2013) The avian taste system: Potential
implications in poultry nutrition. Animal Feed Science and Technology
180(1-4): 1-9.
15. Hamdard E, Lv Z, Jiang J, Wei Q, Shi Z, et al. (2009) Responsiveness
Expressions of Bitter Taste Receptors Against Denatonium Benzoate
and Genistein in the Heart, Spleen, Lung, Kidney, and Bursa Fabricius of
Chinese Fast Yellow Chicken. Animals 9(8): E532.
16. Wiener A, Marina Shudler, Anat Levit, Masha Y Niv (2011) Bitter
DB: a database of bitter compounds. Nucleic acids research 40(D1):
D413-D419.
Submission Link: https://biomedres.us/submit-manuscript.php
Assets of Publishing with us
Global archiving of articles
Immediate, unrestricted online access
Rigorous Peer Review Process
Authors Retain Copyrights
Unique DOI for all articles
https://biomedres.us/
This work is licensed under Creative
Commons Attribution 4.0 License
ISSN: 2574-1241
DOI: 10.26717/BJSTR.2019.22.003787
Fangxiong Shi. Biomed J Sci & Tech Res
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
Simple Summary Denatonium benzoate is a strong bitter taste receptor agonist, extensively used for its activation of different cell pathways. Taste signals have been associated to food recognition and avoidance, and bitter taste provokes an aversive reaction and is assumed to protect chickens from consuming poisons and harmful toxic substances. The results of the study revealed that dietary supplementation with medium and high doses of denatonium benzoate damaged the epithelial cells of the heart and kidneys by inducing apoptosis and autophagy and reduced the growth of chickens, respectively. However, mRNA expressions of bitter taste receptors, downstream signaling effector genes, apoptosis-, autophagy- and antioxidant-related genes were higher on day 7, while these expressions were subsequently decreased on day-28 in the heart and kidney of Chinese Fast Yellow chickens in a dose-response manner. Abstract The sense of taste which tells us which prospective foods are nutritious, poisonous and harmful is essential for the life of the organisms. Denatonium benzoate (DB) is a bitter taste agonist known for its activation of bitter taste receptors in different cells. The aim of the current study was to investigate the mRNA expressions of bitter taste, downstream signaling effectors, apoptosis-, autophagy- and antioxidant-related genes and effector signaling pathways in the heart/kidney of chickens after DB dietary exposure. We randomly assigned 240, 1-day-old Chinese Fast Yellow chicks into four groups with five replicates of 12 chicks and studied them for 28 consecutive days. The dietary treatments consisted of basal diet and feed containing DB (5, 20 and 100 mg/kg). The results revealed that dietary DB impaired (p < 0.05) the growth performance of the chickens. Haemotoxylin and eosin staining and TUNEL assays confirmed that medium and high doses of DB damaged the epithelial cells of heart/kidney and induced apoptosis and autophagy. Remarkably, the results of RT-PCR and qRT-PCR indicated that different doses of DB gradually increased (p < 0.05) mRNA expressions of bitter taste, signaling effectors, apoptosis-, autophagy- and antioxidant- related genes on day 7 in a dose-response manner, while, these expressions were decreased (p < 0.05) subsequently by day-28 but exceptional higher (P < 0.05) expressions were observed in the high-dose DB groups of chickens. In conclusion, DB exerts adverse effects on the heart/kidney of chickens in a dose-response manner via damaging the epithelium of the heart/kidney by inducing apoptosis, autophagy associated with bitter taste and effector gene expressions. Correlation analyses for apoptosis/autophagy showed agonistic relationships. Our data provide a novel perspective for understanding the interaction of bitter taste, apoptosis, autophagy and antioxidative genes with bitter taste strong activators in the heart/kidney of chicken. These insights might help the feed industries and pave the way toward innovative directions in chicken husbandry.
Article
Full-text available
Simple Summary In chickens, bitter taste is the most significant biological taste disrupter; it is believed to protect chickens against consuming poisonous/toxic materials and considered a warning signal prior to ingestion. The bitter taste receptors’ extraoral expression information is deficient in chicken, and denatonium benzoate is extensively used as a bitter taste receptor agonist in different cells. Our results found that qRT-PCR showed a high level of dose-dependent expressions of ggTas2Rs in the starter and grower stages in the heart, spleen, lungs, and kidneys, while the dose-dependent expressions were lower in the bursa Fabricius. The growth performance of the selected organs significantly (and unexpectedly) improved upon the administration of denatonium benzoate 5 mg/kg and genistein 25 mg/kg treatments, while the gains in organ weights were impaired in the groups given denatonium benzoate 20 mg/kg and 100 mg/kg, respectively. Abstract The present study was conducted to investigate the responsiveness expressions of ggTas2Rs against denatonium benzoate (DB) and genistein (GEN) in several organs of the Chinese Fast Yellow Chicken. A total of 300 one-day-old chicks that weighed an average of 32 g were randomly allocated into five groups with five replicates for 56 consecutive days. The dietary treatments consisted of basal diet, denatonium benzoate (5 mg/kg, 20 mg/kg, and 100 mg/kg), and genistein 25 mg/kg. The results of qRT-PCR indicated significantly (p < 0.05) high-level expressions in the heart, spleen, and lungs in the starter and grower stages except for in bursa Fabricius. The responsiveness expressions of ggTas2Rs against DB 100 mg/kg and GEN 25 mg/kg were highly dose-dependent in the heart, spleen, lungs, and kidneys in the starter and grower stages, but dose-independent in the bursa Fabricius in the finisher stage. The ggTas2Rs were highly expressed in lungs and the spleen, but lower in the bursa Fabricius among the organs. However, the organ growth performance significantly (p < 0.05) increased in the groups administered DB 5 mg/kg and GEN 25 mg/kg; meanwhile, the DB 20 mg/kg and DB 100 mg/kg treatments significantly reduced the growth of all the organs, respectively. These findings indicate that responsiveness expressions are dose-dependent, and bitterness sensitivity consequently decreases in aged chickens. Therefore, these findings may improve the production of new feedstuffs for chickens according to their growing stages.
Article
Full-text available
Bitter taste elicits an aversive reaction, and is believed to protect against consuming poisons. Bitter molecules are detected by the Tas2r family of G-protein-coupled receptors, with a species-dependent number of subtypes. Chickens demonstrate bitter taste sensitivity despite having only three bitter taste receptors—ggTas2r1, ggTas2r2 and ggTas2r7. This minimalistic bitter taste system in chickens was used to determine relationships between in-vitro (measured in heterologous systems) and in-vivo (behavioral) detection thresholds. ggTas2r-selective ligands, nicotine (ggTas2r1), caffeine (ggTas2r2), erythromycin and (+)-catechin (ggTas2r7), and the Tas2r-promiscuous ligand quinine (all three ggTas2rs) were studied. Ligands of the same receptor had different in-vivo:in-vitro ratios, and the ggTas2r-promiscuous ligand did not exhibit lower in-vivo:in-vitro ratios than ggTas2r-selective ligands. In-vivo thresholds were similar or up to two orders of magnitude higher than the in-vitro ones.
Article
Full-text available
The sense of taste has a key role in nutrient sensing and food intake in animals. A standardized and simple method for determination of tastant-detection thresholds is required for chemosensory research in poultry. We established a 24-h, 2-alternative, forced-choice solution-consumption method and applied it to measure detection thresholds for 3 G-protein-coupled receptor-mediated taste modalities—bitter, sweet, and umami—in chicken. Four parameters were used to determine a significant response: 1) tastant-solution consumption; 2) water (tasteless) consumption; 3) total consumption (tastant and water together); 4) ratio of tastant consumption to total consumption. Our results showed that assignment of the taste solutions and a water control to 2 bottles on random sides of the pen can be reliably used for broiler chicks, even though 47% of the chicks groups demonstrated a consistently preferred side. The detection thresholds for quinine (bitter), L-monosodium glutamate (MSG) (umami), and sucrose (sweet) were determined to be 0.3 mM, 300 mM, and 1 M, respectively. The threshold results for quinine were similar to those for humans and rodents, but the chicks were found to be less sensitive to sucrose and MSG. The described method is useful for studying detection thresholds for tastants that have the potential to affect feed and water consumption in chickens.
Article
Full-text available
Taste perception is a crucial biological mechanism affecting food and water choices and consumption in the animal kingdom. Bitter taste perception is mediated by a G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family-the taste 2 receptors (T2R)-and their downstream proteins, whereas sweet and umami tastes are mediated by the GPCR family -taste 1 receptors (T1R) and their downstream proteins. Taste receptors and their downstream proteins have been identified in extra-gustatory tissues in mammals, such as the lungs and gastrointestinal tract (GIT), and their GIT activation has been linked with different metabolic and endocrinic pathways in the GIT. The chicken genome contains three bitter taste receptors termed ggTas2r1, ggTas2r2, and ggTas2r7, and the sweet/umami receptors ggTas1r1 and ggTas1r3, but it lacks the sweet receptor ggTas1r2. The aim of this study was to identify and determine the expression of genes related to taste perception in the chicken GIT, both at the embryonic stage and in growing chickens. The results of this study demonstrate for the first time, using real-time PCR, expression of the chicken taste receptor genes ggTas2r1, ggTas2r2, ggTas2r7, ggTas1r1, and ggTas1r3 and of their downstream protein-encoding genes TRPM5, α-gustducin, and PLCβ2 in both gustatory tissues-the palate and tongue, and extra-gustatory tissues-the proventriculus, duodenum, jejunum, ileum, cecum, and colon of embryonic day 19 (E19) and growing (21 d old) chickens. Expression of these genes suggests the involvement of taste pathways for sensing carbohydrates, amino acids and bitter compounds in the chicken GIT. © 2015 Poultry Science Association Inc.
Article
The discovery of the growth promoting property of antibiotics led to their use as antibiotic feed additives (AFAs) in animal feed at sub-therapeutic doses. Although this has been beneficial for animal health and productivity, it has been, essentially, a double-edged sword. The continued and non-judicious use of AFAs has led to the selection and dissemination of antibiotic-resistant strains of poultry pathogens such as Salmonella, Campylobacter and Escherichia coli. The rapid spread of drug-resistant pathogens as well as emergence of antibiotic-related environmental pollutants is of global concern. Hence, the identification and development of new and effective alternatives to antibiotics that do not hinder productivity is imperative. For this, it is essential to understand not only the molecular basis of development of resistance to AFAs but also the mechanisms of action of AFA alternatives and how they differ from AFAs. This review provides a molecular perspective on the alternatives to antibiotics that have been proposed till date and their current trends, as well as novel approaches such as development of improved delivery systems.
Article
Umami taste is one of the five basic taste qualities, along with sweet, bitter, sour, and salty, and is elicited by some L-amino acids and their salts, including monopotassium L-glutamate (MPG). The unique characteristic of umami taste is that it is synergistically enhanced by 5'-ribonucleotides such as inosine 5'-monophosphate (IMP). Unlike the other four basic taste qualities, the presence of umami taste sense in avian species is not fully understood. In this study, we demonstrated the expression of multiple umami taste receptor candidates in oral and gastrointestinal tract tissues in chickens using RT-PCR analysis. We first showed the metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) expressed in these tissues. Furthermore, we examined the preference for umami taste in chickens, focusing on the synergistic effect of umami taste as determined by the two-feed choice test. We concluded that chickens preferred feed containing both added MPG and added IMP over feeds containing either added MPG or added IMP alone and over the control feed. These results suggest that the umami taste sense and synergism are conserved in chickens.
Chapter
7.1 CHEMICAL SENSES The chemical senses generally fall into three categories: chemesthesis (irritation and pain), olfaction (smell), and gustation (taste). Traditionally, the emphasis in describing responsiveness to chemical stimuli has been placed on taste and smell. The reality is more complex. For example, the sensory afferents for chemesthetic perception are in close proximity with olfactory receptors in the nasal cavity and with gustatory receptors in the oral cavity. Because external chemical stimuli can be processed by multiple sensory systems, there has been a great deal of confusion in the literature on the importance of individual sensory modalities. Generally, the principal mediating sensory modality may be related to stimulus type, concentration, and presentation. However, when perception of external chemical stimuli occurs via the integrated perception across modalities, the combined perceptual quality is commonly referred to as flavor.
Article
Taste has evolved largely as a mechanism to identify nutritious foods and is important for detecting nutritionally relevant carbohydrates, amino acids, lipids, salts and toxic compounds. Species differences in the taste system are intimately related to ecological niche and food availability. It has been argued that birds have a lower taste acuity compared to mammals due to their low taste bud numbers. In addition, chickens seem to have fewer taste receptor genes: the sweet taste receptor is missing and their bitter taste receptor repertoire is very small, consisting of only three members. Furthermore, chickens compared to pigs show a lower sensitivity to glucosinolates. However, chickens are able to quickly adapt their feeding behaviour based on taste cues and the ratio of the number of taste buds/oral cavity volume is higher than in most mammals. Compared to ruminants, chickens show higher aversion to glucosinolates and compared to humans a similar avoidance to quinine chloride. Moreover, many birds (including commercial chicken breeds) seem to have high acuity for dietary calcium. Emerging knowledge mostly derived from genome sequencing, shows that birds have a well-developed taste system. Predicted taste genes for umami, sour, salt, bitter, calcium and lipids are present in the chicken, turkey and zebra finch genomes. Preliminary data indicate that the umami taste receptor may be intact in chickens and that the bitter taste receptor repertoire is small in chickens, but in some bird species it is as large as in mammals. Some of the novel findings outlined in the review have the potential to bring important innovations to the practice of poultry nutrition such as reduction in phosphorus excretion, optimize the use of amino acids and fats, use of alternative feedstuffs or the short and long term manipulation of feed intake. In conclusion, the avian taste system is well developed but differs significantly with different species. Behavioural and genetic evidence show that birds have an accurate capacity to detect different taste modalities challenging the broad consensus that birds have lower taste acuity than mammals. Finally, avian taste is intimately related to nutrient sensing and, consequently, to poultry nutrition practices.