ArticlePDF Available

Sighting rates and prey of Minke Whales (Balaenoptera acutorostrata) and other cetaceans off Cormorant Island, British Columbia

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

From June to August 2012, we conducted over 500 h of visual surveys from Cormorant Island, British Columbia, to determine behaviour and habitat use patterns of nearby cetaceans. Seven species were documented, but Minke Whales (Balaenoptera acutorostrata) were by far the most common and were observed lunge feeding at the surface on 15 occasions. In addition, this species was documented surface lunge feeding on Pacific Herring (Clupea pallasi) and Pacific Sand Lance (Ammodytes personatus) on 32 occasions during vessel-based cetacean surveys around Cormorant Island between 2010 and 2014. Although Minke Whales are relatively uncommon in British Columbia, these results indicate that they can regularly be found in specific feeding areas during the summer.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Sighting rates and prey of Minke Whales (Balaenoptera
acutorostrata

 
*1and3
1Marine Education a nd Research Society, P.O. Box 1347, Port McNeill, British Columbia V0N 2R0 Canada
2Bay Cetology, P.O. Box 554, Alert Bay, British Columbia V0N 1A0 Canada
3Hakai Institute, P.O. Box 309, Heriot Bay, British Columbia V0P 1H0 Canada
*Correspondi ng author: jrtowers@gmail.com
Towers, J.R., C.J. McMillan, and R.S. Piercey. 2019. Sighting rates and prey of Min ke Whales (Balaenoptera acutorostrata)
  
    

                        
          
(Balaenoptera acutorostrata      
  Clupea pallasi  
Lance (Ammodytes personatus     
 
    
Key words: Min ke Whale; Balaenoptera acutorostrata Clupea pallasi
Sand Lance; Ammodytes personatus; Cormora nt Island; British Columbia
     
           
  
 
   
 
for depleted populations of Killer Whale (Orcinus
orca), Humpback Whale (Megaptera novaeangliae),
   Balaenoptera physalus), and some
      
ingly abundant and widespread in coastal waters in
   et al. 2009, 2013, 2017; Nichol et
al. 2018; Towers et al. 2015, 2018, 2019). Although the
  

ecology and habitat use patterns of some, such as
Minke W hale (Balaenoptera acutorostrata), remain
poorly understood.
Minke Whale is a small, migrator y baleen whale
that normally occurs in coastal waters of the eastern
  et al.
2013). Despite a lack of human exploitation history in
    

     
documented Minke W hales 18 times between 1991 and
        
north, in the coastal waters of British Columbia, sur

  et al. (2010) detected only a combined total of

       
Whales in British Columbia and Washington has also
      
         
(Dorsey et al. 1990) and 44 between 2005 and 2012
(Towers et al.     
not been compared between these periods, but at least

       
 
         
  
sey et al. 1990; Towers et al. 2013).

144
  
Note
2019  et al. 
          

        
          
Herr ing (Clupea pallasi    
(Ammodytes personatus) on 10 and two occasions,
et al.
      
       
          
et al. 2013).
 
shallow compared to depths of other nearby water
   
    
bathymetry in this area result in strong currents (<10

            



           

     
    
       
Island in the summer of 2012 while making concur
rent under water acoustic recordings. This note pre
      

that were opportunistically documented from small

to 2014. The acoustic results of this study are reported
in Nikolich and Towers (2018).
 
the north shore of Cormorant Island at 50°
°
and 15 × 80 binoculars (Steiner, Greely, Colorado,
USA) with built in magnetic (M) compass and ret
        
           °
(272° ° 
 
         
__Sho re
watch_Seastate.pdf for explanation of Beaufort sea
     
   Balaenoptera acutorostrata) predation

of British Colu mbia.
  Vol . 133
states). Data, including Beaufort sea state, tide height,
 
       
and reticle distance were recorded each time a cet
acean surfaced (Nikolich and Towers 2018), but when
Minke W hales and other species were present in the

  
 
         
     
       
scribed and shown in Towers (2011). To reduce any
biases arising from animals being missed when sight

area, cetacean occurrence is portrayed in this paper
           
   
  
   

    

             
   
    
aceans were documented: Minke Whale, Humpback
      Orcinus
orca; also known as West Coast Transient popula
Phocoenoides dalli), Harbour
Porpoise (Phocoena phocoena    
sided Dolphin (Lagenorhynchus obliquidens 
2). Minke Whales had the highest PPUE (0.44), as

        
     
   
Towers 2011). Harbour Porpoises were the second
most commonly present species in the study area fol
      
 
 
documented transiting; although most species likely
foraged at depth in the study area, only Minke Whales,
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Date
Units of survey effort
15−Jun 30−Jun 15−Jul 30−Jul 15−Aug
Effort
MW HP
DP HW
PWSD BKW
FW
   
Island, Br itish Columbia, 11 June to 15 August 2012.
MW HP HW DP PWSD BKW 
  45 39 14 20 5 4 1
Sightings 1551 109 113 35 23 40 3
Units present 224 80 27 23 8 8 2
PPUE 0.44  0.05 0.04 0.02 0.02 0
                   O rcinus orca            Phocoenoides dalli           Balaenoptera
physalusPhocoena phocoenaMegaptera novaeangliae  
Minke W hale (Balaenoptera acutorostrataLagenorhynchus obliquidens).
 
 
   
Balaenoptera acuto-
rostrataPhocoena phocoena),
Megaptera novaeangliae), DP
Phocoenoides dalli
 Lagenorhynchus obliquidens), BKW
Orcinus orca 
(Balaenoptera physalus).
        

   
occasion, and Minke and Humpback Whales were
    
            

any species was detected.
Between 10 September 2010 and 7 August 2014,
                
morant Island was also opportunistically documented
      
        
        

              

 


2019  et al. 
Of the other species documented in this study, all
    
et al.   
chol et al. 2013; McMillan et al. 2018; Towers et al.
2018). Among them, at least the second, third, and


   et al.
1998; Nichol et al.
search Society unpubl. data). All species documented
       
          

         
  Min ke Whale (Balaenoptera acutorostrata Clupea p alla si) o n 18
Ammodytes personatus) on 11 June 2014. Photos: Jared Towers.
148  Vol . 133
         Balaenoptera acutorostrata) around Cormorant Island,
Clupea pallasi
(Ammodytes personatus).
Date  Prey species
10 Se p. 2010 M004 
10 Se p. 2010 
18 Jul. 2011 M0 01  
27 Jul. 2011   
1 Aug. 2011 M022  
18 Sep. 2011 M007 
18 Sep. 2011 M007 
15 Jul. 2012 M0 01 
15 Jul. 2012 M004  
15 Jul. 2012 M0 01 
15 Jul. 2012 M002 
 M001 
 M004 
18 Jul. 2012 M004  
18 Jul. 2012 M004  
18 Jul. 2012 M004 
Date  Prey species
18 Jul. 2012 M004 
20 Jul. 2012 M022  
25 Jul. 2012 M0 01  
    
17 Jun. 2013 M0 01  
17 Jun. 2013 M0 01  
17 Jun. 2013 M0 01  
17 Jun. 2013 M0 01  
11 Sep. 2013 M001 
11 Jun. 2014 M0 01 
11 Jun. 2014 M0 01 
14 Jun . 2 014   
1 Jul. 2014 M022  
1 Jul. 2014 M022  
31 Jul. 2014   
7 Aug. 2014 M0 01  

et al. (2 018).
        
         

ings compared with other cetacean species and numer

     


 
documented such high rates of Minke Whale occur



        
Minke W hales and their prey are not unlike those
documented in Minke Whale habitat in other regions.
            
shallow water that is near deeper water in Washington
  et al. 1989) and Scotland (Robinson et al.
2009). The dynamic bottom topography of such areas
          
      et al. 20 05;
Tynan et al.
substrate around Cor morant Island and in other areas
where Minke Whales are often found in the west
ern and eastern North Atlantic (Naud et al. 2 003;
MacLeod et al. 2004; Robinson et al. 2009; de Boer
   

 et al.
     
 
   
tuations in the abundance and distribution of their


   
        

 


This research was funded in part by Mountain

     
  

bert and Wendy Thompson for supplying some ma

for input toward study design, and George Speck for
 
Nation land.

 2010. Cetacea n abundance in the Califor nia current

  
    
 
fornia, USA.
  and    2007. Abundance and popula
tion densit y of cetaceans in the California current eco


  and    
         
Ammodytes personatus
         
2019  et al. 
            
            
to whales: trophic lin ks in a coastal upwelling system.
     

             
ke whale Balaenoptera acutorostrata 
        

08598
 and 
1990. Minke whale (Balaenoptera acutorostrata) from


Whaling Commission 
2014. Marine Mammals of British Columbia.
Royal BC Museum , Victoria, Brit ish Columbia, Can ada.
     
   and  
        

            
          
Columbia, Canada.
            
   
   2017. Habitats of special im
portance to resident Killer Whales (Orcinus orca   
       
        
Oceans Canada, Ottawa , Ontar io, Canada.
      
 and  2009. An
    
           
              
eries and Oceans Canada, Ottawa, On tario, Canada.
 and 
 
of critical habitat for transient Killer Whales (Orcinus
orca           
            
eries and Oceans Ca nada, O ttawa, Ontario, Canada.
    and     

         
Biological Stat ion, Nanaimo, Brit ish Columbia, Cana da.
      and  1989. The for
  
    
    
            
 and 2004.
Seasonal distribution of min ke whales Balaenoptera
acu torostrata                               
Isle of Mull, Scotland. Marine Ecology P rogress Series

        2018.
 
humpback whale foraging strateg y. Marine Mammal
       
                                           
    Lagenorhyncus obli-
quidens   
        
         
    and 

phology on minke whale (Balaenoptera acutorostrata)
distr ibution in t he Mingan Island (Canada). Journal of
   
  
  
      
      2018. Distribution,
     
(Balaenoptera physalus    

  
Ontario, Canada.
           
 and  
lap and niche partit ioning of sympatric harbor por
   
         
 
     
common minke whales (Balaenoptera acutorostrata) in
 
   
 and 
2009. The dist ribution and habitat preference of coast
ally occu rring minke whales (Balaenoptera acutoro-
strata       
         

   
 
 
bia, Cana da.
 and     
    
dent Killer Whale population in 2014. Canadian tech
         
               
  
 and  
(Balaenoptera physalus   
continental North America. Northwestern Nat uralist 99:
       
  
        
          
          
          

 
               
      
      
  
ters of Brit ish Columbia, Canada. Canadian technical
150  Vol. 133
     
and Oceans Canad a, Ott awa, Onta rio, Cana da.
  
 and   2005. Cetacean distributions
           
      

       
                 
Phocoena phocoena      Pho coe-
noides dalli, in the i nland waters of Brit ish Co lu m bia a nd
in Mar ine Mam mal Protection
     
 

  and   2007. Distribution and
abunda nce of mari ne mammals in the coastal wa
ters of Brit ish Columbia, Canada. Journal of Cetacea n

R
Accepted 17 January 2019
... Sand lance are known to comprise part of the diet for at least 100 predators Penttila, 2007;Harvey et al., 2010;Alheit and Peck, 2019;Staudinger, 2020;Scordino et al., 2022;Shaffer et al., 2023). Examples include seabirds, especially Alcids Zamon, 2000;Pastran et al., 2021); fish such as Chinook (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) and coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch; Duguid, 2020), Pacific cod (Gadus macrocephalus; Gunther et al., 2023), and lingcod (Ophiodon elongatus; Beaudreau and Essington, 2007); and larger mammals like Steller sea lions (Eumetopias jubatus; McKenzie and Wynne, 2008), harbor seals (Phoca vitulina richardii; Lance et al., 2012), and baleen whales such as humpback (Megaptera novaeangliae; Wright et al., 2016), minke (Balaenoptera acutorostrata; Okamura et al., 2009;Towers et al., 2019) and fin (Balaenoptera physalus; Moore et al., 2019). They play a particularly important role during the breeding of seabirds because of the high energy content, and slender bodies that are easily transported to, and consumed by, chicks (Willson et al., 1999;Bertram et al., 2001;Hedd et al., 2006;Beaubier and Hipfner, 2013). ...
Article
Full-text available
Like many forage fish species, Pacific sand lance (Ammodytes personatus) play a key role in nearshore marine ecosystems as an important prey source for a diverse array of predators in the northeastern Pacific. However, the primary threats to Pacific sand lance and their habitat are poorly defined due to a lack of systematic data. Crucial information needed to assess their population status is also lacking including basic knowledge of their local and regional abundance and distribution. Sand lance are currently listed as ‘not evaluated’ under the IUCN red list and they have not been assessed by US and Canadian agencies. This hampers management and policy efforts focused on their conservation. To address this knowledge gap, we conducted a three-part, structured expert elicitation to assess the vulnerability of Salish Sea sand lance populations. Experts were asked to list and rank key threats to Salish Sea sand lance and/or their habitat, to further quantify the vulnerability of sand lance to identified threats using a vulnerability matrix, and to predict the population trajectory in 25 years from today. Impacts associated with climate change (e.g. sea level rise, sea temperature rise, ocean acidification, and extreme weather) consistently ranked high as threats of concern in the ranking exercise and quantified vulnerability scores. Nearly every expert predicted the population will have declined from current levels in 25 years. These results suggest sand lance face numerous threats and may be in decline under current conditions. This research provides vital information about which threats pose the greatest risk to the long-term health of sand lance populations and their habitat. Managers can use this information to prioritize which threats to address. Future research to reliably quantify population size, better understand the roles of natural and anthropogenic impacts, and to identify the most cost-effective actions to mitigate multiple threats, is recommended.
Article
Full-text available
The minke whale (Balaenoptera acutorostrata) is a small species of baleen whale with a cosmopolitan distribution. Despite extensive study on the vocalizations of other balaenopterids, the acoustic repertoire of minke whales is not well known. Individuals of the North Pacific subspecies (B. acutorostrata scammoni) produce unique vocalizations (‘boings’) during their putative breeding season from fall to spring. However, no vocalizations have been previously reported for this subspecies in any eastern North Pacific feeding ground. We present two call types recorded in the presence of six minke whales, two of which were confirmed as female, in Cormorant Channel, British Columbia, Canada, during the summer of 2012. The calls consist of downsweeps and pulse chains. These call types share some characteristics with calls described elsewhere, although they are not identical to similar call types observed for other populations. Calling rates for minke whales in this study region are very low compared to those reported for this subspecies on its putative breeding grounds, as well as for other subspecies on their feeding grounds. We propose predation risk, sexual segregation and acoustic masking as potential causes of the low calling rates observed for minke whales in Cormorant Channel.
Conference Paper
The minke whale (Balaenoptera acutorostrata) is the smallest species of baleen whale and has a cosmopolitan distribution. Despite extensive study on the vocalizations of other balaenopterids, the acoustic repertoire of minke whales is not well known. Individuals of the North Pacific subspecies of common minke whale (B. a. scammoni) are known to produce unique vocalizations ("boings") during their putative breeding season from fall to spring. However, no vocalizations have been previously reported for this subspecies in summer feeding grounds. We present four novel call types recorded in the presence of minke whales in Cormorant Channel, in coastal British Columbia, Canada, during the summer of 2012. These calls consist of broadband pulses, tonal wavers, downsweeps, and pulse trains. Calling rates for minke whales in this study region were very low compared to those reported for North Atlantic minke whales on their feeding grounds. We compare our candidate call types with vocalizations described for other minke whale populations and propose predation risk as a cause of the low calling rates observed for minke whales in Cormorant Channel.
Technical Report
Full-text available
In British Columbia, Bigg’s (transient) killer whales have been opportunistically photo-identified for several decades. This report uses a 61-year archive of photo-identification data from 1958-2018 to provide information on the abundance and distribution of Bigg’s killer whales known from BC. In total, 766 unique individuals were identified in a total of 6277 encounters during this time period. To identify the subset of this population that is most likely to be impacted by human activity due to showing the most fidelity to coastal waters over time, we developed criteria based on rates of occurrence, both overall and during recent years. A total of 206 mature individuals that were alive in 2018 were encountered at least once since 2014 and were documented during at least seven years or 11 or more encounters during the study period. Their offspring and other inferred maternally related kin include an additional 143 individuals. This population subset of 349 individuals has grown at an observed average annual rate of 4.1% since 2012 due to relatively low mortality and the birth of over 100 calves during this time period. Identification images of the dorsal fins, saddle patches, and eyepatches of all of these individuals as well as calves born to date in 2019 are provided. Details on the birth years, sex, maternal ancestry, social cohesion, and distribution of these individuals are also provided, when known.
Article
Full-text available
The minke whale (Balaenoptera acutorostrata) is a small species of baleen whale with a cosmopolitan distribution. Despite extensive study on the vocalizations of other balaenopterids, the acoustic repertoire of minke whales is not well known. Individuals of the North Pacific subspecies (B. acutorostrata scammoni) produce unique vocalizations (‘boings’) during their putative breeding season from fall to spring. However, no vocalizations have been previously reported for this subspecies in any eastern North Pacific feeding ground. We present two call types recorded in the presence of six minke whales, two of which were confirmed as female, in Cormorant Channel, British Columbia, Canada, during the summer of 2012. The calls consist of downsweeps and pulse chains. These call types share some characteristics with calls described elsewhere, although they are not identical to similar call types observed for other populations. Calling rates for minke whales in this study region are very low compared to those reported for this subspecies on its putative breeding grounds, as well as for other subspecies on their feeding grounds. We propose predation risk, sexual segregation and acoustic masking as potential causes of the low calling rates observed for minke whales in Cormorant Channel.
Article
Full-text available
The innovation and diffusion of novel foraging strategies within a population can increase the capacity of individuals to respond to shifts in prey abundance and distribution. Since 2011, some humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) off northeastern Vancouver Island (NEVI), Canada, have been documented using a new feeding strategy called “trap‐feeding.” We provide the first description of this foraging innovation and explore the ecological and social variables associated with its diffusion using sightings data, video analysis, and logistic regression modeling. The number of humpback whales confirmed to trap‐feed off NEVI increased from two in 2011 to 16 in 2015. Neither the locations of trap‐feeding sessions nor prey species consumed differed from those documented during lunge‐feeding. However, preliminary results indicate that the schools of fish consumed when individuals trap‐fed were smaller and more diffuse than those consumed when whales lunge‐fed. Top‐ranked models predicting whether an individual would be observed exhibiting trap‐feeding behavior included the following parameters: average number of days per year that the individual was seen off NEVI and proportion of the individual's associations that were with other trap‐feeders. These results suggest that trap‐feeding may be a culturally transmitted foraging innovation that provides an energetically efficient method of feeding on small, diffuse prey patches.
Technical Report
Full-text available
Fin Whale distribution and habitat use in northern waters of British Columbia (BC) were investigated using a multi-scale study approach based on data collected by Fisheries and Oceans Canada’s Marine Mammal Research Section. Ship-based survey data were used to model Fin Whale distribution as a function of habitat features in Hecate Strait and Queen Charlotte Sound and the results indicate that Moresby Trough and Greater Caamaño Sound were predicted to have the highest densities of whales. Photo-identification data were used to assess movement and site-fidelity of individual Fin Whales, and to estimate abundance. There was little indication of movements between the inshore region of Hecate Strait and Queen Charlotte Sound and the offshore region of Canadian Pacific waters, although there was more photo-identification effort applied to the inshore region. The overall abundance of Fin Whales present in the Hecate Strait and Queen Charlotte Sound region (including Greater Caamaño Sound) at any one time during the study period (2009-2014) was estimated to be 405 Fin Whales (CV = 0.6, 95% CI = 363-469), based on a photo-identification mark-recapture model. Analysis of satellite-linked telemetry tags using State-Space-Switching modelling indicated that tagged Fin Whales (n=19) remained in the area of Hecate Strait and Greater Caamaño Sound for the duration of their tag transmissions and exhibited extended periods of Area-Restricted-Search (ARS) movement behaviour which may represent foraging behaviour. Analysis of satellite-linked dive tags (n=6) indicated that during periods of ARS movement, dives were deeper during the day (70.1 ± 52.1 m SD) than at night (24.9 ± 17.4 m SD) and likely represented foraging behaviour. Tagged Fin Whales, particularly in Caamaño Sound, where most of the dive tags were deployed, dove consistently to depths likely associated with dense day-time zooplankton layers.
Article
Full-text available
Historically, Fin Whales (Balaenoptera physalus) were relatively common off the west coast of North America but very few records of their occurrence in waters between Vancouver Island and continental North America exist. To confirm their presence in these waters we collected photographs documenting at least 13 unique individuals during 43 encounters from 1999 to 2017. These records are the first of live Fin Whales in Queen Charlotte, Johnstone, Georgia and Juan De Fuca Straits and are also the only confirmed sightings between Vancouver Island and continental North America since 1930. Additionally, 12 dead Fin Whales all with evidence of ship strikes are reported in these waters between 1986 and 2017. Most (88%) sightings of live Fin Whales occurred between July and October and no individuals were documented dead or alive between January and April. We suggest that Fin Whales in coastal waterways may be at greater risk to ship strikes and predation by mammal-eating Killer Whales (Orcinus orca) than in less confined waters further offshore.
Article
Full-text available
In the eastern North Pacific Ocean, common minke whales (Balaenoptera acutorostrata) are widespread but encountered relatively infrequently. It is generally believed that they make annual migrations between higher latitudes in the summer and lower latitudes in the winter; however, in some temperate coastal regions where common minke whales have been sighted year-round they have been referred to as resident. To determine movement patterns of common minke whales found in coastal waters of British Columbia and Washington we examined photo-identification data that were collected opportunistically from 2005–12. These data were from four non-overlapping areas between 48°N and 53°N. Despite year-round search efforts, common minke whales were only encountered between April and October. Most of the 44 unique individuals identified in 405 encounters displayed fidelity to areas both within and among years. Five of these whales made relatively large-scale intra-annual movements between areas on six occasions. They were documented to move up to 424km in a northerly direction in spring and up to 398km in a southerly direction in autumn. The seasonal patterns of these movements provide new insights into the foraging ranges and migrations of the individuals. Ecological markers provide evidence that the common minke whales photographed undertake annual long distance migrations. Scars believed to be from cookiecutter shark (Isistius brasiliensis) bites were observed on 43 individuals and the majority of whales documented with good quality images each year had acquired new scars since the previous year. Furthermore, the commensal barnacle Xenobalanus globicipitis was observed on three individuals. Since these sharks and barnacles are from relatively warm waters, it can be inferred that they interacted with the common minke whales at lower latitudes. These findings may have important implications for the definition and management of common minke whale stocks and/or populations in the eastern North Pacific.
Article
Full-text available
Information on animal distribution and abundance is integral to wildlife conservation and management. However abundance estimates have not been available for many cetacean species inhabiting the coastal waters of Canada's Pacific coast, including those species that were heavily depleted by commercial whaling. Systematic sightings surveys were conducted in the inshore coastal waters of the Inside Passage, between the British Columbia (BC) Washington and the BC-Alaska borders. A total of 4,400km (2,400 n.miles) of trackline were surveyed in the summers of 2004 and 2005. Abundance estimates (with 95% confidence intervals) assuming certain trackline detection for seven cetacean species were as follows: harbour porpoise, 9,120 (4,210-19,760); Dall's porpoise, 4,910 (2,700-8,940); Pacific white-sided dolphin, 25,900 (12,900-52,100); humpback whale, 1,310 (755-2,280); fin whale, 496 (201-1,220); common minke whale, 388 (222-680); and 'northern resident' killer whale, 161 (45-574). The potential for responsive movement to have affected the accuracy and precision of these estimates is difficult to assess in small-boat surveys. However, the analyses were designed to minimise this factor in the most obvious case (Pacific white-sided dolphins) and pilot data collection has begun to assess the magnitude of the effect and to calculate correction factors for other species. The density of harbour seals, both along the shoreline and at sea, was calculated and it was estimated that total abundance of harbour seals in the study area was at least 19,400 (14,900-25,200). These are new abundance estimates for this region for all cetacean species except killer whales. The small sample size makes the killer whale estimate tenuous, but one worth noting, as it is close to the known number of northern resident killer whales (2004 census was 219 animals, Cetacean Research Program, Pacific Biological Station, Fisheries and Oceans Canada). The common minke whale abundance estimate is similarly tentative, however the results do reveal that common minke whales were relatively rare in this region. While the majority of harbour seals were found as expected in the southern straits and in the mainland inlets, a substantial number of animals were on the north coast and in the Queen Charlotte Basin as well. These data provide a systematic snapshot of summertime distribution and abundance of marine mammals in the Queen Charlotte Basin, where offshore oil and gas development and seismic surveys for geophysical research have been proposed to take place. Similarly, the abundance estimates could be used to form the basis of a simulation exercise to assess the sustainability of observed levels of incidental bycatch of small cetaceans in commercial fisheries. The results described here provide a useful reference point to which future survey data can be compared.
Article
Minke whale (Balaenoptera acutorostrata) distribution was derived from a 12 year observation programme in the Mingan Islands (Canada) and related to three geological features of the sea-floor: maximum depth, topography and geomorphology. Minke whale distribution was not uniform nor random in relation to maximum depth and topography, however, no evident trend was found. The most prominent factor was the presence of underwater sand dunes, where significantly more minke whales were observed than on any other bottom types. Because sand dunes are the favoured habitat of the minke whale major prey in the study area, an indirect link between minke whale distribution, geomorphology and substrate type is suggested.
Article
A bstract This study summarizes occurrence of Pacific white‐sided dolphins ( Lagenorhyncus obliquidens ) in the Broughton Archipelago on the west coast of Canada, from October 1984 through December 1998. Dolphins were detected on 472 d. The annual percent of total occurrence rose from 0.4% in 1984 to 19% in 1994 and then declined to 2% in 1998. Seasonal occurrence peaked from 1 October through January. Dolphin group size ranged from 2 to 1,000; the most common range was 11‐50. While unreported for the Broughton Archipelago prior to 1984, the species is represented by teeth distributed throughout the past 2,000 yr of First Nations midden sediment, suggesting sporadic long‐term occurrence. Increased water temperature from the 1937–1984 mean of 8.6°C, to the 1985–1998 mean of 9.3°C and increased abundance of two fish populations in the study area are considered potential factors in the recent increase in occurrence. Of the 675 naturally marked dolphins that were photo‐identified, 214 were resighted. A pair of dolphins was photographed swimming in tandem, fourteen months apart. Tight groups, of five or fewer extensively scarred dolphins with extremely falcate dorsal fins were seen within every aggregation of over 50 animals, suggesting the existence of all‐male associations. Prey species were collected from 25 encounters with feeding dolphins; they included herring ( Clupea harengus ), capelin ( Mallotus villosus ), and Pacific sardine ( Sardinops sagax ). Predation on eulachon ( Thaleichthys pacificus ) is suspected. Unreported for the Broughton Archipelago, the capelin sampled in this study may belong to the Bering Sea population. Pacific sardines returned to commercial viability on the British Columbia coast in 1997 after a 60‐yr population collapse. Dolphin frequency of occurrence declined following introduction of underwater acoustic deterrent devices into the study area.