ArticlePDF Available

7-keto-DHEA metabolism in humans. Pitfalls in interpreting the analytical results in the antidoping field

  • FMSI(Italy)_IMD(Cuba)
  • Italian Sports Medicine Federation
  • Laboratorio antidoping Roma


7‐keto‐DHEA (3β‐hydroxy‐androst‐5‐ene‐7,17‐dione) is included in the section S1. of the World Antidoping Agency (WADA) List of Prohibited Substances. The detection of its misuse in sports needs special attention, since it is naturally present in urine samples. The main goal of this study is to investigate the in vivo metabolism of 7‐keto‐DHEA after a single administration to healthy volunteers and to better describe the relationship between arimistane (androst‐5‐ene‐7,17‐dione) and 7‐keto‐DHEA after the application of the common routine procedures to detect anabolic steroids in WADA accredited antidoping laboratories. Free, glucuro‐ and sulpho‐conjugated steroids extracted from urine samples obtained before and after the administration of 7‐keto‐DHEA were analyzed by different gas chromatographic (GC) ‐ mass spectrometric (MS) techniques. Gas chromatography coupled to tandem MS to study the effect on the endogenous steroid profile; coupled to isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS) to investigate the potential formation of androgens derived from DHEA and coupled to High Resolution Accurate Mass Spectrometry (HRMS) to investigate new diagnostic metabolites. The analysis by IRMS confirmed that there is no formation of DHEA from 7‐keto‐DHEA. Ten proposed metabolites, not previously reported, were described. These include reduced and hydroxylated structures that are not considered part of the steroid profile in antidoping analyses. They showed considerable responses in all fractions analyzed. Some deoxydation reactions (including arimistane formation) were found and most probably can be linked to the sample preparation or instrumental analysis. This is important when interpreting the results after the application of the procedures to detect steroids in urine currently used in Antidoping laboratories.
7-keto-DHEAmetabolism in humans. Pitfalls in interpreting the
analytical results in the antidoping field
Dayamin Martinez-Brito
| Xavier de la Torre
| Cristiana Colamonici
Davide Curcio
| Francesco Botrè
Laboratorio Antidoping FMSI, Rome, Italy
Department of Experimental Medicine,
SapienzaUniversity of Rome, Rome, Italy
Xavier de la Torre, Scientific Deputy-Director,
Laboratorio Antidoping FMSI, Largo Giulio
Onesti, 1, 00197 Rome RM, Italy.
Email:; xavier.
7-keto-DHEA (3β-hydroxy-androst-5-ene-7,17-dione) is included in section S1 of the
World Antidoping Agency (WADA) List of Prohibited Substances. The detection of
its misuse in sports needs special attention, since it is naturally present in urine sam-
ples. The main goal of this study is to investigate the in vivo metabolism of 7-keto-
DHEA after a single administration to healthy volunteers and to better describe the
relationship between arimistane (androst-5-ene-7,17-dione) and 7-keto-DHEA after
the application of the common routine procedures to detect anabolic steroids in
WADA accredited antidoping laboratories. Free, glucuro-, and sulpho-conjugated ste-
roids extracted from urine samples obtained before and after the administration of
7-keto-DHEA were analyzed by different gas chromatographic (GC)mass spectro-
metric (MS) techniques. Gas chromatography coupled to tandem MS to study the
effect on the endogenous steroid profile, coupled to isotope ratio mass spectrometry
(IRMS) to investigate the potential formation of androgens derived from DHEA and
coupled to high resolution accurate mass spectrometry (HRMS) to investigate new
diagnostic metabolites. The analysis by IRMS confirmed that there is no formation of
DHEA from 7-keto-DHEA. Ten proposed metabolites, not previously reported, were
described. These include reduced and hydroxylated structures that are not consid-
ered part of the steroid profile in antidoping analyses. They showed considerable
responses in all fractions analyzed. Some deoxidation reactions (including arimistane
formation) were found and most probably can be linked to the sample preparation or
instrumental analysis. This is important when interpreting the results after the appli-
cation of procedures to detect steroids in urine currently used in antidoping laborato-
ries. 7-keto-DHEA metabolism in humans for antidoping purposes was studied and
unexpected results were found. This could lead to a misinterpretation of the data,
depending on the procedure applied and the analytical instrumentation used.
7-keto-DHEA, arimistane, IRMS, mass spectrometry, metabolism
Received: 27 August 2019 Revised: 31 October 2019 Accepted: 31 October 2019
DOI: 10.1002/dta.2734
Drug Test Anal. 2019; :16291643. © 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 1629
7-keto-DHEA (3β-hydroxy-androst-5-ene-7,17-dione or 7-oxo-
DHEA) is included in the section S1. Anabolic Androgenic Steroid
(AAS), Subgroup B. Endogenous AAS and their Metabolites and Iso-
mers, when Administered Exogenously, of the World Antidoping
Agency (WADA) List of Prohibited Substances.
7-keto-DHEA is
included in this group since it can be produced endogenously and it
could also be a metabolite of an endogenous anabolic androgenic ste-
roid. In addition, it is also available as a dietary supplement. No criteria
for performing an isotope ratio mass spectrometric (IRMS) confirma-
tion exist, as is instead required by WADA for other pseudo-
endogenous steroids.
In human metabolism, 7-keto-DHEA is produced from DHEA via
its 7α-hydroxylated derivative followed by its oxidation. It does not
activate the androgen receptors, is not converted to androgen and
because of its carbonyl function on the 7 position is not a substrate
for aromatase to form estrogens. It is approximately 2.5 times more
active than DHEA as an inducer of thermogenic enzymes such as
mitochondrial glycerophosphate dehydrogenase and cytosolic malic
enzyme. It enhances interleukin-2 production by human mononuclear
The available scientific literature on human metabolism of this
compound is mainly focused on the reduction of the ketone at the C7
position leading to the formation of 7β- and 7α-hydroxylated isomeric
metabolites. It has been reported that the 7β-isomer is formed in
greater proportion and that its activity is at least five times higher
than its 7α-isomer and its 7-keto precursor.
Due to its steroidal structure, presumably 7-keto-DHEA
undergoes an extensive phase I metabolism characterized by reduc-
tions and/or oxidations and the formation of hydroxylated metabo-
lites in all possible combinations. In the context of doping analysis, 7α-
and 7β-hydroxylated metabolites and 7ξ-hydroxy-androstenedione
have been described as the main in vivo metabolites,
while other
authors have described hydroxylations in C9α,C1β, and C12βunder
in vitro conditions.
Reviewing the anecdotal information available on some websites
marketing this supplement, arimistane (androst-3,5-diene-7,17-dione)
is postulated to be the main metabolite of 7-keto-DHEA. To the best
of our knowledge, no peer-reviewed reference is available to date.
Arimistane is the 3-desoxy reduced derivative of 7-keto-DHEA and it
is included in section S4. Hormone and Metabolic Modulators. Sub-
group 1. Aromatase Inhibitors of the WADA Prohibited List.
On the other hand, several authors have described the synthesis
of androst-3,5-diene-7-one related structures from androst-
5-ene,37-dione or androst-5-ene-3β-ol-7-one structures under
acidic conditions.
At the same time, another group demonstrated
the competitive inhibition of the mitochondrial aromatase activity of
androstan-3,5-diene-7,17-dione; androstan-3,5-diene-7-one-17-ol;
androstan-5-ene-7,17-dione, and androstan-5-ene-7-one-17-ol struc-
tures. The structures with an hydroxyl group in C17 showed a less
inhibitory effect than 17-one structures, but in any case the
configuration androst-5-ene-7-one is present,
confirming the
adequate inclusion of arimistane in the section of the WADA
prohibited list.
The analysis of the urinary steroids sulfate fraction has been
described widely and has been gaining more attention in recent years
in the antidoping field.
The use of either enzymatic and/or chemi-
cal hydrolysis has its specific advantages and disadvantages. Shackle-
ton reported that most steroid sulfates can be hydrolyzed
enzymatically, although this is probably not the universal method of
choice for all the compounds of interest. Solvolysis may in some
instances be preferable as it only hydrolyzes sulfates and does not dis-
criminate the steroid disulfates.
Several authors have published results after solvolysis by the use
of ethyl acetate, methanol, and sulfuric acid in different proportions,
also considering the effect of the temperature and time of incubation.
Most publications describe no pH adjustment before the solid phase
extraction (SPE) previous to the hydrolysis; if so, an acid buffer was
Finally, others described the use of glacial acetic acid
before the solvolysis, but in some cases, acetylated artifacts were
reported to have been produced.
At this point, a careful revision of
the data must be done in order to differentiate the proposed real
metabolites from potential artifacts formed during the sample
Figure 1 shows the relationship among the chemical structures of
DHEA, 7-keto-DHEA, and arimistane as well as the main metabolic
routes. The main goal of this paper was to investigate the in vivo
metabolism of 7-keto-DHEA after a single oral administration and
additionally to better describe the relationship between arimistane
and 7-keto-DHEA after the application of the common routine proce-
dure to detect anabolic androgenic steroids in WADA accredited anti-
doping laboratories.
2.1 |Reference material and reagents
Androst-5-ene-3β-ol-7,17-dione (7-keto-dehydroepiandrosterone,
7-keto-DHEA), androst-5-ene-3β,7α-ol-17-one (7α-OH-DHEA),
androst-5-ene-3β,7β-ol-17-one (7β-OH-DHEA), 5α-androstane-
3α,17β-diol (5α-Adiol), and 5β-androstane-3α,17β-diol (5β-Adiol) were
supplied by Steraloids Inc (Newport, USA). Androst-5-ene-3β-ol-
17-one (dehydroepiandrosterone, DHEA), androst-4-ene-3-one-17β-
ol (testosterone, T), testosterone-D3 (T-D3), androsterone (A),
etiocholanolone (Etio), and 17α-methyltestosterone (MT) were pur-
chased from Sigma-Aldrich (Milan, Italy). Androst-4-ene-3-one-17α-ol
(epitestosterone, E), etiocholanolone-D5 (Etio-D5), androsterone-D4
(A-D4), and androsterone-D4 glucuronide were purchased from the
National Measurement Institute (North Ryde, Australia) and androst-
3,5-diene-7,17-dione (arimistane) was purchased from MuseChem
(CA, USA). Androst-3,5-diene-7β-ol-17-one (arimistane metabolite)
was supplied by WAADS (World Association of Antidoping Scientists).
2.1.1 |Sulfate reference material used to optimize
the solvolysis incubation time
Etiocholanolone D5 (Etio-D5) sulfate, DHEA sulfate, etiocholanolone
sulfate, testosterone sulfate, and epitestosterone sulfate were pro-
vided by NMI (North Ryde, Australia) and 11β-hydroxy-
etiocholanolone sulfate, epiandrosterone sulfate, and 5-androstene-
3β,17β-diol disulfate by Steraloids (Newport, USA).
All reagents and solvents (sodium bicarbonate, potassium carbon-
ate, sodium phosphate, sodium hydrogen phosphate, tert-butylmethyl
ether, and ammonium hydroxide) were of analytical or HPLC grade
and provided by Carlo Erba (Milan, Italy). Enzyme β-glucuronidase
from Escherichia coli K12 was from Roche Diagnostic (Mannheim, Ger-
many). Water was from a Milli-Q water purification system (Millipore
S.p.A, Milan, Italy). Mercaptoethanol (2-ME), ammonium iodide, and
N-methyl-N-trimethylsilyl-trifluoracetamide (MSTFA) were purchased
from Sigma-Aldrich (Milan, Italy), Macherey-Nagel (Germany), and
Sigma-Aldrich (MO, USA), respectively.
2.2 |Description of the urinary excretion samples
Urinary excretion studies were carried out with the participation of
two healthy volunteers (male and female, 46 and 51 years old, 69 and
88 kg body weight respectively, normal BMI in both cases). A single
oral dose of 100 mg of 3-acetyl-7-keto-DHEA (Now Foods,
Bloomingdale, IL, USA) was administered. Samples were collected
before administration and up to 48 hours (male) and 77 hours (female)
post-administration. The samples were kept frozen until analysis. This
observational study fulfills the recommendations for research involv-
ing human subjects described in the Declaration of Helsinki.
informed consent was obtained from the volunteers after approval of
the Ethical Committee (Lazio 1) of the Lazio Region (Rome, Italy).
2.3 |Evaluation of the capsule content
The content of the capsule was dissolved in methanol to reach a con-
centration of 10 μg/mL. Then 5 μL of the solution was injected on an
Agilent 1290 Infinity II LC System coupled to an Agilent Ultivo LC/TQ;
analytical column Eclipse Plus C18 (50 mm length ×2.1 mm internal
diameter ×1.8 μm particle size); the mobile phase flow was
0.4 mL/min; mobile phase A: water (0.1% formic acid) and B: methanol
(0.1% formic acid): A(90%) B(10%) for 1 min, A(5%) B(95%) in
5 min total run 7 min. The ion source was AJS ESI, fragmentor 135 V,
acquisition in positive ionization and scan mode (m/z 55500); scan
time 500 ms. The nebulizer nitrogen gas pressure was set at 40 psi.
Simultaneously reference material arimistane (retention time
4.20 min) and 7-keto-DHEA (retention time 3.9 min) were analyzed.
No presence of arimistane nor any other impurity was observed in the
capsule content. The results agree absolutely with the observation of
Lorenz et al.
FIGURE 1 Relationship among
DHEA, 7-keto-DHEA, and arimistane
chemical structures and probable
metabolic routes. Inside the dashed line
are the most described target metabolites
for 7-keto-DHEA (7α- and 7β-hydroxy-
2.4 |Optimization of the solvolysis incubation
In order to evaluate a suitable incubation time, a mix of 1 μg of DHEA
sulfate, Etio sulfate, T sulfate, E sulfate, 11β-hydroxy-Etio sulfate,
EpiA sulfate, and 5-androstene-3β,17β-diol sulfate was incubated for
3 hours at 55C in 1 mL of the solvolysis mixture (ethyl
acetate/methanol/sulfuric acid, 80: 20: 0.12, v:v:v). Measurements
were done after 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, and 3 hours of hydrolysis (n = 3) and
after neutralization with ammonium hydroxide, liquidliquid extrac-
tion (LLE) with tert-butylmethyl ether (TBME) of the deconjugated
steroids. The TMS derivatives were analyzed by GC-TOF and the
absolute areas were used to evaluate the responses after 1 and
3 hours by the application of Student's t-test (α= 0.05).
The internal standard for sulfate analysis (ISTD) was prepared
from methanolic solutions of MT, T-D3, A-D4, and Etio-D5 sulfate.
The recovery of these compounds was evaluated by comparison of
aliquots (n = 3) after the solvolysis (at 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, and 3 hours) and
LLE, with the same amount analyzed without solvolysis nor LLE
(n = 3).
2.5 |Experiment to verify the formation of
arimistane from 7-keto-DHEA
Reference material of 7-keto was derivatized with decreasing propor-
tions of MSTFA: ammonium iodine: 2-mercaptoethanol (1000:4:6;
1000:2:3; 1000:1:1.5; 1000:0.5:0.75; 1000:0.25:0.38; v:w:v) and
MSTFA (n = 3 each). The replicates of the derivatized 7-keto-DHEA
were immediately injected onto GC-QTOF.
2.6 |Sample treatment
The analysis of the free plus glucuronated (F + G) fraction of the uri-
nary steroids for antidoping analysis has been described earlier.
Briefly, to 2 mL of urine, ISTD containing among others MT, T-D3, A-
D4-glucuronide, and Etio-D5 was added. Then the pH was adjusted
using phosphate buffer (750 μL, 0.8 M, pH 7) to carry out the hydroly-
sis of glucuronates by β-glucuronidase from E. coli (50 μL). The sam-
ples were incubated for 1 h at 55C and then the pH was elevated to
910 using carbonate/bicarbonate buffer (0.5 mL, 20%). Double
liquidliquid extraction was carried out with TBME (2 ×4 mL) and the
remaining aqueous phase was conserved. The dry residue was
derivatized with MSTFA/NH
I/2-ME (1000:2:6, v:w:v) at 70C for
30 min to form the per-trimethylsilyl (enol-TMS) derivatives. The
hydrolysis efficiency was monitored by evaluating the A-D4 (from A-
D4 glucuronide) to Etio-D5 ratio in all samples.
The remaining aqueous phase from the previous step was used
for the analysis of the sulfate (S) fraction by solvolysis in an organic
solvent. The residual TBME was evaporated under a stream of nitro-
gen and then solid phase extraction was conducted on C18 columns
C18, Waters SpA, Milan, Italy) after adding the ISTD
mixture for the sulfate fraction. The solvolysis using a mixture of ethyl
acetate/methanol/sulfuric acid (1 mL, 80: 20: 0.12, v:v:v) was done by
incubating the samples 1.5 hours at 55C. The pH was neutralized
using ammonium hydroxide and a double liquidliquid extraction was
done using TBME (2 ×4 mL). The evaporated residue was derivatized
using the same derivatization mixture described before at 70C for
30 min to form the pertrimethylsilyl (enol-TMS) derivatives. The
hydrolysis efficiency was monitored by evaluating the A-D4 to Etio-
D5 (from Etio-D5 sulfate) ratio in all samples.
3.1 |Endogenous steroid profile
The endogenous steroid profile was measured using an Agilent 7890A
gas chromatographer coupled to an Agilent 7000 triple quadrupole
mass spectrometer (Agilent Technologies SpA, Cernusco sul Naviglio,
Milan, Italy). The chromatography was performed using a HP1MS
(Agilent J&W, CPS Analitica, Milano, Italy) methyl fused-silica capillary
column (17 m ×0.2 mm, 0.11 μm film thickness). The initial tempera-
ture was 188C for 2.5 min, then increased at 3C/min to 211C
maintained 2 min, ramped at 10C/min to 238C, then ramped at
40C/min to 320C, and kept for 3.5 min at the final temperature.
Helium was used as a carrier gas at constant pressure (1 bar) and 2 μL
of extract was injected in split mode (1:20). Both the injector and
transfer line were operated at 280C. The data acquisition was per-
formed in multiple reaction monitoring (MRM). This method was used
for the determination of the steroid profile as defined in the WADA
technical document TD2018EAAS which is routinely used by the
WADA accredited laboratories. The steroid profile included quantita-
tion of T, E, A, Etio, 5α-Adiol, 5β-Adiol, and the ratios T/E, A/Etio,
A/T, 5α/5β-Adiol, and 5α-Adiol/E. The method is approved by the
National Body of Accreditation of Italy as part of the laboratory
17025 scope of accreditation.
3.2 |Metabolism study
The metabolism study was carried out on an Agilent 7890B gas chro-
matograph coupled to a 7200 Accurate Mass Q-TOF GC/MS system.
The chromatographic conditions were as the same as described
before. The acquisition was in SCAN mode in the range from 50 to
750 Da, scan time 500 ms/spectrum. The molecular formulae of the
proposed structures were based on the measurement of the accurate
mass and the difference (Δ) between the experimental and theoretical
mass expressed as ppm. Errors below 5 ppm were considered accept-
able. Characteristic mass fragments were used as additional evidence
of the proposed structures. The combined information derived from
enol-TMS and MSTFA (only hydroxyl group derivatized) allowed for a
preliminary structural elucidation.
In order to compare the relative responses on the excretion of
the proposed metabolites detected, and since no reference materials
of most of the compounds are available, the results are presented as
the relative response of the metabolite base peak to the response of
MT added in the samples at a concentration of 250 ng/mL.
3.3 |HPLC sample purification
For the evaluation of the isotopic ratio content of the parameters of
the steroid profile a method published earlier was used.
Briefly, uri-
nary extracts from samples at 0, 6, and 13 hours after the administra-
tion, were purified on an Agilent 1100 Series liquid chromatograph
(Agilent Technologies SpA, Cernusco sul Naviglio, Milan, Italy). The
selected fractions were collected by an Agilent 1100 fraction collec-
tor. The separation conditions were established by monitoring the sig-
nal of a UV lamp at 192 nm (Agilent 1100 UV DAD detector). Sample
purification to obtain adequate extracts of the target compounds
(TCs) and endogenous reference compounds (ERCs) was performed
using a C18 column + guard column from ACE (CPS Analitica, Milan,
Italy) (25 cm, 4.6 mm, 5 μm and 2 cm, 4.6 mm, 5 μm) at 38C. Separa-
tion was programmed with a mobile phase composed of water (sol-
vent A) and acetonitrile (solvent B). The flow rate was set at
1 mL/min. The collected fractions were taken to dryness under a
nitrogen stream at 70C. Before analysis by GC-C-IRMS, the fractions
were dissolved with an adequate volume of a mixture cyclohexane:
isopropanol (4:1, v/v) to reach a response on the linear range of the
Additionally, for better elucidation of the proposed structures
during the metabolic study, a clean-up step by HPLC was applied to
two samples extracted in duplicate: blank urine and sample collected
3 hours after 7-keto-DHEA administration. These four aliquots were
extracted as described previously for F + G and S conjugates. After
injection into the HPLC with the same conditions described previ-
ously, 1 min fractions were collected for a total of 38 fractions (F1 to
F38). One set of fractions for each sample was derivatized using the
same protocol described earlier (MSTFA/NH
I/2-ME) and the other
one with only MSTFA (50 μL for 30 min at 70C) with the aim of dis-
tinguishing the hydroxyl and keto groups present in the proposed
metabolites. All extracts were analyzed by GC-TOF.
3.4 |GC-C-IRMS analyses
GC-C-IRMS analyses were performed on an HP6890 gas chromato-
graph connected to a combustion furnace linked to a Thermo Delta
Advantage isotope ratio mass spectrometer through an Isolink-
Conflow IV interface (ThermoElectron, Bremen, Germany). The chro-
matography was performed in a HP5MS (J&W Scientific, CPS
Analitica, Milan, Italy) 5% phenylmethyl fused-silica capillary column
(30 m ×0.25 mm i.d. ×0.25 μm film thickness). The oven temperature
program was the following: initial temperature 150C for 1 min,
increased at 25C/min to 260C maintained 4 min, increased at
25C/min to 310C, and kept 2.7 min at the final temperature. Helium
was used as the carrier gas at 2.1 mL/min and injection, 2 μLof
extract, was performed in splitless mode at 280C.
4.1 |Endogenous steroid profile and
measurements of δ
It has been reported that 7-keto-DHEA is not a biologically active pre-
cursor of endogenous androgens or estrogens, nevertheless, it is con-
sidered to be a marker of DHEA administration under the current
WADA criteria. The collection of the samples covered a period of
48 hours (volunteer 1) and 77 hours (volunteer 2), therefore at least
two circadian cycles were included in the study by which the influ-
ence of normal variations can be ruled out. After the steroid profile
analysis by GCMS/MS, fluctuations in the urinary concentrations
could not be correlated either with the oral administration of 7-keto-
DHEA or exogenous pseudoendogenous steroids, but with the normal
fluctuation of the circadian cycle. Ratios between T/E, A/Etio, and
5α/5β-Adiols also showed no alteration.
The concentrations of DHEA and its main 7-hydroxylated metab-
olites were monitored as part of the alternative hydroxylated profile
for endogenous steroids analyzed in GCMS/MS. Figure 2 shows the
time-course of DHEA, 7α-hydroxy-DHEA, 7β-hydroxy-DHEA, and
7-keto-DHEA in the F + G fraction of urine. Differences in the excre-
tion profile of DHEA were observed for the two volunteers. While the
male showed no alterations, the female volunteer showed increased
concentrations up to 450 ng/mL in the F + G fractions that returned
to basal at 10 hours after the administration.
Both subjects showed an apparent alteration in the urinary con-
centrations of 7α-hydroxy-DHEA compatible with an oral administra-
tion, but by comparing the data obtained after the analysis of the
steroid profile by GCMS/MS and the analysis by GC-TOF, interest-
ing information emerged. The RT of 7α-OH-DHEA (13.54 min, vali-
dated qualifier transition m/z 415 > 325) is very close to androst-
4,6-diene-3,17-dione (13.56 min). The molecular mass for 4,6-diene-
TMS derivative is m/z 428, and the main fragments in its MS corre-
spond to M
(m/z 413) and M
] (m/z 323). The
isotopic contribution of the ions m/z 413 to m/z 415 and m/z 323 to
m/z 325 is evident when a positive sample is analyzed by GC
MS/MS. Therefore, it is easy to misinterpret the results because there
is an apparent alteration of the 7α-OH-DHEA when, actually, the
response belongs to a different analyte. The presence of androst-4,-
6-diene-3,17-dione (instead of the 7α-OH-DHEA), in samples col-
lected after the administration of 7-keto-DHEA, was confirmed by
GC-TOF with the simultaneous analysis of the suitable reference
material (Figure 3). The origin of androst-4,6-diene-3,17-dione will be
presented below.
The fact that the 7β-hydroxy-isomer showed no visible alteration
in the concentration (for both volunteers) does not agree with previ-
ous publications about 7-keto-DHEA metabolism.
The results
obtained by GCMS/MS are supported by the measurements in GC-
TOF, and no explanation as was observed for the 7α-isomer could be
An increment of the 7-keto-DHEA was observed as expected.
In order to investigate the potential formation of DHEA from
7-keto-DHEA, IRMS measurements (δ
C) of A, Etio, T, 5α-Adiol,
5β-Adiol, and DHEA were done. Their values, as well the differences
with two ERC showed no positivity to any exogenous administra-
tion(Table 1 shows the results using only pregnanediol as endoge-
nous reference compound). The scientific literature reported that no
androgenic (or estrogenic) effects were observed after the adminis-
tration of 7-keto-DHEA, so the results based on GC/C/IRMS in the
present study seem to be in agreement with these observations
although additional studies with a larger number of individuals are
Once the formation of DHEA from 7-keto-DHEA was discarded
based on the IRMS results, the difference in the urinary DHEA con-
centrations between the volunteers could only have a pharmacologi-
cal explanation based on the differences between males and females.
FIGURE 2 Urinary concentration time course for DHEA, apparent 7α-hydroxy-DHEA, 7β-hydroxy-DHEA, and 7-keto-DHEA in free +
glucuronated fraction for volunteer 1 (M, male) and volunteer 2 (F, female) measured in the routine GCMS/MS procedure for establishing the
steroid profile
It is known that the variety of metabolites and their concentrations
depends on the enzymatic and genetic endowment of each individual.
Moreover, the depletion of cofactors and enzymes (generally pro-
voked by xenobiotics) favor the use of alternative metabolic routes. In
the specific case of DHEA, numerous references describe the differ-
ences in its metabolism in women and men. For example, it has been
reported that women excreted nearly twice as much non-glucuronide
and non-sulfate conjugates in the urine compared with men. Several
authors have also described the sex difference in the plasma DHEA to
DHEA-S ratio (higher in women) that may well be explained on the
basis of greater in vivo cleavage of DHEA-S to DHEA in women than
in men.
FIGURE 3 (A) Chromatogram of the transition m/z 415 > 325 at 13.54 min. Screened for 7α-OH-DHEA for a positive control and reference
material of androst-4,6-diene-3,17-dione and 7α-OH-DHEA after the analysis by GCMS/MS, (B.1) mass spectrum of 7α-OH-DHEA reference
material molecular ion at m/z 520.3228, (B.2) mass spectrum of androst-4,6-diene-3,17-dione reference material, (B.3) mass spectrum of in a
sample collected after the administration of 7-keto-DHEA analyzed by GC-TOF, and (B.4) extracted chromatogram of theoretical mass m/z
520.3224 ± 20 ppm for the same sample in B.3 showing no presence of 7α-OH-DHEA after the administration of 7-keto-DHEA analyzed by GC-
In summary, in a real doping scenario and by interpretation of the
List of Prohibited Substances (section S1.b), the concentrations found
for 7-keto-DHEA after the analysis of routine GCMS/MS, should be
considered as a normal individual physiological levelsince the results
obtained by GC/C/IRMS excluded any exogenous administration of
DHEA or other pseudoendogenous compounds.
On the other hand, the use of 7-keto-DHEA as a target metabo-
lite probably requires a study to establish the population reference
intervals in order to set a concentration threshold in the WADA TD-
EAAS, as is presently established for T and E (200 ng/mL) or A and
Etio (10 000 ng/mL). This is, however, not free of difficulties since
many parameters, such as sex, age, ethnicity, genetic polymorphism,
among others, should be considered; and reference values for 7-keto-
DHEA are described for a Caucasian population only.
In order to
avoid this work, it is necessary to search outside the common
endogenous steroid profile to differentiate the administration of
DHEA from 7-keto-DHEA. This search included the free + glucuronide
(F + G) and sulfate (S) fractions of the urine.
4.2 |Optimization of the solvolysis incubation
time and stability under solvolysis conditions
A set of experiments was conducted in order to assess the opti-
mum incubation time of hydrolysis. The results obtained could be
used to evaluate the stability of the compounds as well. Theoreti-
cally, a decreasing response of the metabolites with time could
indicate a degradation process. On the contrary, an increment of
the response could mean incomplete hydrolysis of the sulfates and
then a modification of the experimental protocol would probably
be needed.
Despite the same initial concentration of the analytes, the differ-
ences observed are due to the response factors on the chromato-
graphic capillary column and the mass spectra and because the ratio
to MT calculation was done using the base peak. The application of
Student's t-test (α= 0.05) showed no significant differences between
the absolute areas of the free analytes after 1 and 3 hours of hydroly-
sis. This result confirms also the stability of the compounds over
3 hours of hydrolysis, liquidliquid extraction (LLE), and derivatization
The responses of MT, T-D3, and And-D4 (ISTD) after 1, 1.5,
2, 2.5, and 3 hours of hydrolysis (n = 3) was compared with the
response of the same analytes without solvolysis. Assuming the
responses of the analytes without solvolysis (nor LLE) as 100%, the
recovery could be evaluated preliminarily. Figure 4B shows the results
where stability is evident. The Student's t-test (α= 0.05) showed no
significant differences between the responses after 1 and 3 hours of
hydrolysis. Recovery was observed to be between 98112% for MT,
8998% for T-D3, and 8093% for A-D4.
The hydrolysis incubation time was set to 1 hour in the study of
the S fraction of urine collected after the 7-keto-DHEA administra-
tion. Notwithstanding the satisfactory statistical analysis, low amounts
(lower than 4%) of acetylated by-products were found after the first
hour. This issue was considered not significant, since the aim of the
study was not quantitative.
4.3 |Metabolism of 7-keto-DHEA
Considering the known metabolic routes for steroid metabolism,
redox reactions, hydroxylations, and isomerization reactions are
expected. In addition to glucuronated metabolites, the 3β-
TABLE 1 Results obtained after the application of isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS) assay to the parameters of the endogenous steroid
profile to two volunteers after the administration of the single oral dose of 7-keto-DHEA
Volunteer 1 (male) 0 22.7 23.3 22.7 24.2 23.5 21.6 23.6 23.3
622.6 23.4 22.9 23.8 23.5 - 22.9 23.2
13 22.5 23.3 22.8 23.5 23.2 21.9 22.6 22.8
0 0.9 0.3 0.9 0.6 0.2 2.0 Negative sample
6 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.9 0.5 -
13 0.2 0.6 0.2 0.9 0.6 0.8
Volunteer 2
021.6 21.9 - 23.2 23.9 20.4 21.3 21.7
621.6 22.5 - 23.0 24.3 21.0 21.8 22.5
13 21.4 22.1 - 22.7 23.8 21.0 21.4 21.7
00.3 0.6 - 1.8 2.7 0.9 Negative sample
6 0.2 0.7 - 1.2 2.5 0.8
13 0.02 0.7 - 1.3 2.3 0.4
Endogenous reference compound (ERC).
configuration of 7-keto-DHEA suggests a considerable formation of
sulfoconjugated metabolites. The analysis of the S fraction revealed
several interesting compounds after the administration of 7-keto-
DHEA. However, the signals observed in the first part (ca 7 min) of
the chromatogram showing m/z 340, could be degradation products
from 7-keto-DHEA and/or from its metabolites, probably produced
by the acidic conditions of the solvolysis.
4.4 |Free plus glucuronated urinary fraction
In the free + glucuronated (F + G) urinary fraction, some metabolites
eluted at a RT close to a very complex zone of hydroxylated endoge-
nous steroids. In addition, structures of some poly-hydroxylated
metabolites at higher RT were observed as well. Table 2 shows the
most significant metabolites found in urine after a single oral adminis-
tration of 7-keto-DHEA, which were not present in negative urine col-
lected before the administration or they could be present below the
detection capacity of the procedure. Most of the metabolites pro-
posed here have not been described in previous investigations on
so they could be interpreted as specific metabolites of
4.5 |Reduced metabolites of 7-keto-DHEA
The most interesting compound observed was the probable 3α-isomer
of 7-keto-DHEA itself (I). Its presence is possible by the formation of
an intermediate with 3-keto configuration as described for the iso-
meric analytes after the activity of 3βand 3α-hydroxysteroid dehydro-
genases. The intermediate structure of androsten-3,7,17-trione was
observed at 15.8 min showing a time-course consistent with an oral
administration (C
, m/z 516.2893, Δ. 2.9 ppm). The maxi-
mum response of the 3α-isomer was estimated at 35μg/mL in the
F + G fraction, and it was not observed in the S fraction, corroborating
its 3α- configuration. The last sample collected by volunteer 1 (77 h)
showed a relative response close to 60 ng/mL, while 7-keto-DHEA
was not detected after 23 h after the administration. The responses in
the last collected sample for volunteer 2 were estimated close to
150 and 10 ng/mL for 3α-isomer and 7-keto-DHEA, respectively.
Having a 3β- configuration, it would be expected that higher concen-
trations of 7-keto-DHEA would be found in the S fraction, but the
levels were about 85% of those found in the F + G fraction (see expla-
nation below). Figure 4 shows the mass spectra of 7-keto-DHEA and
its proposed 3α-isomer in the F + G fraction. After the purification of
the samples by HPLC, prior and 7 hours after the administration, this
3α-isomer could be observed in fraction 2 (F2). The trimethylsilylation
(without enolization) of the compound supported the postulated
structure (Table 2).
Two reduced structures from 7-keto-DHEA (II and III) were
observed and it can be assumed as well that the configuration is 3α-
hydroxy because their excretion was only in the F + G fraction. The
similarity among the MS spectra of these metabolites, 7-keto-DHEA,
and the 3α-isomer is remarkable, because of the delocalization of one
electron in the conjugated system 5-ene-7-one (Figure 5). In the F1
fraction, where only hydroxyl groups are derivatized (MSTFA), two
FIGURE 4 Extracted chromatogram for ion at m/z 517.3 (± 20 ppm) and mass spectra of the 3α-isomer of 7-keto-DHEA (I, 15.52 min) and
7-keto-DHEA (15.6 min) in free + glucuronated fraction of urine
compounds at m/z 448 were detected, supporting the proposed
structures as androst-5-ene-3α,17ξ-diol-7-one. The accurate mass is
compatible with the presence of one keto group and two hydroxyl
groups. The effect of the conjugated π-electron system resulting in
charge delocalization is additional evidence of the presence of
androst-5-ene-7-keto configuration.
A similar observation was
made in 7a-hydroxy-testosterone tris-O-TMS resulting in a
3,7-dihydroxy-3,5-diene structure.
The presence of the ion at m/z 169 is generally linked to a
trimethylsilylated 17-keto group. The mass spectra of the proposed
metabolites II and III showed the non-relevant presence of this ion
because of the proximity of two analytes showing an intense ion at
m/z 169. Figure 5 shows the extracted mass chromatogram at m/z
519 and m/z 169 as well as the mass spectra of the metabolites.
Based on this, we could hypothesize the presence of one hydroxy
group in C17 instead of a 17-keto group. These nearby metabolites
showed higher responses but the presence of common ions in their
mass spectra with endogenous compounds (m/z 520) diminish the
specificity of the results, at least under our assay conditions.
Being two isomers with similar mass spectra, the 17β-hydroxyl (II)
configuration was assigned to the peak showing a higher response
since excretion as glucuronate is favored. In any case, additional ana-
lytical techniques are required to establish the correct configuration
of the structures.
The analyte showing the highest response relative to MT was not
observed in the blank urine samples collected before the administra-
tion and it was estimated at 17.4 μg/mL (volunteer 1, t
5.5 h) and
4.4 μg/mL (volunteer 2, t
3 h). After the HPLC purification, this
compound (IV) could be observed in F1 and F2. The strong intensity
of the ion at m/z 169 indicates the presence of the C17-oxo group.
Besides, the accurate mass corresponded to a structure showing two
hydroxyl groups and two unsaturations, one of them is the C17-keto
group and the other is supposed to be at Δ56. Because it was found
only in the F + G fraction, the 3α- configuration can be proposed.
TABLE 2 Proposed metabolites found in urine after the administration of a single oral dose of 7-keto-DHEA
ID Description Derivative/fraction Formula
Theor. Mass
Exp. mass
I7-keto-dehydroepiandrosterone (3α-isomer of
TMS-enol C
15.49 517.2989 517.2978 2.2
Si 15.16 374.2277 374.2286 2.3
II Androst-5-ene-3α,17[β]-diol-7-one TMS-enol C
15.67 519.3146 519.3146 0.0
15.90 448.2829 448.2842 2.9
III Androst-5-ene-3α,17[α]-diol-7-one TMS-enol C
15.77 519.3146 519.3140 1.16
15.78 448.2829 448.2833 0.9
IV Androst-5-ene-3α,7ξ-diol-17-one TMS-enol C
15.20 520.3224 520.3224 0.05
14.33 448.2828 448.2826 0.67
V5α-androstane-3α,7ξ-diol-17-one (7ξ-OH-A) TMS-enol C
14.50 522.3380 522.3383 0.43
13.85 450.2985 450.2982 0.77
VI 5β-androstane-3α,7ξ-diol-17-one (7ξ-OH-Etio) TMS-enol C
15.50 522.3380 522.3386 1.0
15.10 450.2985 450.2995 2.11
VII Androst-3,5-diene-3,7ξ,17ξ,16ξ-tetraol TMS-enol C
16.10 608.3568 608.3582 2.19
593.3333 593.3348 2.37
16.10 608.3568 608.3574 0.88
593.3333 593.3326 1.33
VIII Androst-5-ene, 7-keto, 3α,17ξ,16ξ-triol TMS-enol C
15.90 608.3568 608.3547 3.5
593.3333 593.3327 1.17
16.18 536.3173 536.3163 1.94
IX Androst-5-ene,3α,7ξ,17ξ,16ξ-tetraol TMS-enol C
15.98 610.3725 610.3716 1.5
595.3490 595.3509 3.12
15.27 538.3329 538.3301 5.3*
523.3095 523.3104 1.69
394.2723 394.2727 0.93
XAndrost-5-ene,3α,7ξ,17ξ,16ξ-tetraol TMS-enol C
16.22 610.3725 610.3724 0.19
595.3490 595.3493 0.43
16.22 610.3725 610.3721 0.68
595.3490 595.3497 1.11
The molecular ion m/z 538.3301 is present at 2% of the base peak in the mass spectrum.
Additionally, in the F + G fraction, two apparently isomeric com-
pounds with an intense ion at m/z 169 were detected. The RT of
these two analytes were, respectively, 14.4 min (V) and 15.5 min (VI).
Based on the accurate mass of the enol-TMS and TMS derivatives of
the hydroxyl groups as well as their presence in the F + G fraction, the
structures proposed could be 7ξ-hydroxy-A and 7ξ-hydroxy-Etio.
Only 8% of the 7ξ-hydroxy-Etio was found in the S fraction. Their
responses relative to MT were estimated at 2 μg/mL (volunteer 1, t
5.5 h, volunteer 2, t
3 h) for 7ξ-hydroxy-A, and 3 μg/mL (volunteer
1, t
5.5 h) and 15 μg/mL (volunteer 2, t
3 h) for 7ξ-hydroxy-Etio.
Of the reduced metabolites, those identified as IV and VI showed
a longer excretion time and higher responses. The last sample col-
lected showed a relative response of metabolite IV of 200 ng/mL (vol-
unteer 1, 48 h) and 80 ng/mL (volunteer 2, 77 h); and metabolite VI
showed a relative response of 500 ng/mL for both volunteers (volun-
teer 1, 48 h and volunteer 2, 77 h).
4.6 |Hydroxylated metabolites of 7-keto-DHEA
In addition to the previously presented reduced metabolites, the pres-
ence of hydroxylated metabolites related to 7-keto-DHEA
administration could also be detected. Two signals showing a molecu-
lar ion at m/z 608.35 whose molecular formula corresponds to struc-
tures with two unsaturations and four oxygens could be corroborated
by their accurate mass as enol-TMS and TMS derivatives. None of
them was found in the urinary S fraction.
After purification by HPLC and subsequent derivatization, one of
them showed the same RT and mass spectrum found in F1 (VII), lead-
ing us to propose the presence of four hydroxyl groups and two C-C
unsaturations most probably in positions Δ56 and Δ34. Meanwhile,
the analysis of the other one showed a molecular formula consistent
with the presence of a keto group (VIII) because of the difference of
72 Da with respect to the enol-TMS derivative. The fact that both
mass spectra show an intense ion at m/z 503 (M
-OTMS) could
be an indication that the position of the additional hydroxyl group is
in C16, which is expected by comparison with the related structure to
DHEA. Taking into account that they were observed only in the F + G
fraction and the steric hindrance of the D ring for conjugation, it could
be hypothesized that the configuration is 3α-hydroxy-7-keto. The
response of these hydroxylated analytes relative to MT were
0.3 μg/mL (volunteer 1, t
5.5 h) and 1.5 μg/mL (volunteer 2, t
3 h) for compound VII, while for compound VIII it was 0.03 μg/mL
(volunteer 1, t
5.5 h) and 0.35 μg/mL (volunteer 2, t
3 h).
FIGURE 5 Chromatogram and mass spectra of the trimethylsilyl derivatives of the reduced metabolites of 7-keto-DHEA (II and III) in free
+glucuronated fraction of the urine as well as the interference showing an intense ion at m/z 169
Finally, two compounds equally hydroxylated but reduced were
observed at 15.9 min (IX) and 16.22 min (X). The MS showed a molec-
ular ion at m/z 610.37 Da as enol-TMS as well as an intense fragment
for the loss of CH
+ OTMS. After the purification by HPLC and pos-
terior hydroxyl derivatization, a signal was observed at the same RT
and mass spectra leading us to propose the presence of four hydroxyl
groups and only one C-C unsaturation. In the case of Δ56 reduction,
two isomers 5α- and 5β- should be formed but instead, only com-
pound X, was found. So far, it can be postulated that the Δ56
unsaturation remains, the Δ34 is reduced, and no isomers are
The accurate mass and the molecular formula of the hydroxyl-
TMS derivative of compound IX, showed the presence of four oxy-
gens including one keto-group (underivatized). After analysis of the
HPLC fractions, we observed one signal for both enol-TMS (16.1 min)
and TMS (16.2 min) showing a much lower intensity. The molecular
mass presented an ion at m/z 610.3705 Da (error 0.68 ppm) as enol-
TMS and m/z 538.3312 Da (error 3.32 ppm) as TMS. Considering the
similarity and the intensities observed, it is probable that the structure
for compound Xis 16β-hydroxy-17-one, while the lower intensity sig-
nal could be its isomer 17β-hydroxy-16-one. This hypothesis agrees
with the results described by Numazawa et al.
Using deuterated
compounds and making measurements of the activation and
enolization energies, he concluded that the mechanism of equilibrium
of hydration-dehydration in the D ring favors the configuration 16β-
hydroxy-17-one over the isomer 17β-hydroxy-16-one.
The maximum response of hydroxylated-reduced analytes relative
to MT were 0.5 μg/mL (volunteer 1, t
5.5 h) and 0.9 μg/mL (volun-
teer 2, t
3 h) for compound IX, while for compound Xthey were
0.6 μg/mL (volunteer 1, t
5.5 h) and 1.6 μg/mL (volunteer 2, t
3 h).
At the end of the study, of the four reduced metabolites, those
identified as IX and Xwere those excreted for longer and showed a
higher response. The last sample collected showed a relative response
of metabolite IX of 30 ng/mL (volunteer 1, 48 h) and 1 ng/mL (volun-
teer 2, 77 h); and the metabolite Xshowed a relative response of
about 50 ng/mL for both volunteers (volunteer 1, 48 h and volunteer
2, 77 h).
4.7 |Degradation products or in vivo metabolites?
The solvolysis conditions for the cleavage of the sulfate conjugates
are quite aggressive for some steroidal structures. Specifically, de-
oxidation of the 3β-hydroxy group in a 3,5-diene-7-keto configuration
has been described widely under acidic conditions.
The usual pro-
cedure to detect steroids in antidoping laboratories, include a derivati-
zation step, which occurs in acidic pH medium. This condition and the
high temperature of the GC injector are enough to degrade the
7-keto-DHEA present in the urine sample to produce androst-3,-
5-diene-7,17-dione, also known as arimistane. In fact, a rapid experi-
ment was carried out to demonstrate the formation of arimistane in
the presence of 7-keto-DHEA under the common conditions of
trimethylsilylation to detect steroids and to evaluate the endogenous
steroid profile. To obtain the TMS derivative of the 7-keto-DHEA ref-
erence material, different derivatization mixtures with different pro-
portions of MSTFA, ammonium iodide, and 2-mercaptoethanol were
used. After the analysis by GC-TOF a signal at the RT with an MS
corresponding to arimistane was observed. Figure 6 shows the per-
centage of arimistane that was formed from 7-keto-DHEA in each
The results obtained after the instrumental analysis of the enol-
TMS of a reference material of 7-keto-DHEA showed arimistane (m/z
428 at 11.2 min) the response being 7 fold the response of 7-keto-
DHEA. This in situ formation of arimistane was shown to be depen-
dent on the quantity of 7-keto-DHEA available in the sample. It
means that faced with an adverse analytical finding to a 7-keto-DHEA
sample, reasonable amounts of arimistane and its metabolite (androst-
3,5-diene-7β-ol-17-one) should be detected. The last one probably
originated from one of the reduced metabolites described earlier,
leading to a results misinterpretation.
Reviewing the results of the urinary excretion of 7-keto-DHEA
in the F + G fraction, it was observed that the highest response of
the 7β- metabolite of arimistane was at 6 ng/mL for volunteer 1 (t
7.5 h) and was not detected in volunteer 2. Meanwhile, arimistane
showed a maximum response for volunteers 1 (t
5.5 h) and 2 (t
3 h), corresponding to a relative response of 63 and 84 ng/mL,
respectively. On the other hand, the S fraction showed the highest
value of these two compounds in agreement with the previous com-
ment regarding the acidic conditions. The maximum value of the 7β-
metabolite was ca 50 and 10 ng/mL for volunteers 1 (t
7.5 h) and
6 h), respectively, while arimistane itself was observed at
9 and 2.5 μg/mL for volunteers 1 (t
3 h),
The analysis of the HPLC purified fractions of the F + G fraction,
showed the arimistane response was 37 times higher than 7-keto-
DHEA itself in F3. Considering the lower polarity of arimistane struc-
ture (two keto groups and two double C-C bonds) it is not expected
to find the presence of this compound in this early fraction in which
the poly-hydroxyl structures were collected. In fact, the elution of the
arimistane reference material under the HPLC conditions was much
later. Consequently, its presence here can be attributed to the deriva-
tization step. While analysis of the S fraction showed arimistane and
7-keto-DHEA with similar responses observed in F3, for F32 the
arimistane response was 78 fold higher than that found in F3. Based
on that, two different origins for arimistane can be suggested: one as
a degradation product of 7-keto-DHEA because of the acidic condi-
tions during sample preparation and/or as an in vivo metabolite of
The analysis of the HPLC F2 (F + G fraction), that contains the
3α- isomer of 7-keto-DHEA, did not show the presence of
arimistane (m/z 428 at 11.2 min). On the contrary, it showed the
presence of androst-4,6-diene-3,17-dione (13.5 min, identified by
MS and RT compared with the pure reference material). The
response of this diene-dione was only 10% of the 3α-isomer proba-
bly because of the higher stability of the 3α- configuration
compared with the 3β- configuration. Additionally, the F17 for
F + G and S fractions showed the presence of this diene-dione
compound in a similar response but close to 10% of the response
of arimistane in F32. Considering them as degradation products, the
origin is quite easy to hypothesize because all the metabolites with
androst-3,5-diene-7-one or androst-5-ene-7-one configurations will
yield the corresponding 3-deoxidated product. Once the presence
of androst-4,6-diene-3,17-dione is confirmed, it is probable that its
formation will have its origin in the proposed metabolite identified
as VII (androst-3,5-diene-3,7ξ,17ξ,16ξ-tetraol). In any case, these
biomarkers (degradation products or in vivo metabolites) should be
considered to be of minor interest, providing additional information
to better understand a 7-keto-DHEA finding.
Figure 7 shows the time course of the urinary elimination of these
compounds in the F + G and S fractions. All the metabolites described
showed an elimination time higher than 7-keto-DHEA itself observed
in the F + G fraction. At 15 hours after the administration, 7-keto-
DHEA started to return to basal values, while in the last sample col-
lected by volunteer 1 (48 h) the relative responses of seven proposed
metabolites were over 100 ng/mL. The same behavior was observed
for volunteer 2. The S fraction showed that the main compounds
observed were arimistane (androst-3,5-diene-7,17-dione) and
androst-4,6-diene-3,17-dione considered as degradation metabolites,
so far.
4.8 |Preliminary IRMS measurements of δ
the metabolites
Direct δ
C() measurement of the 3-acetyl-7-keto-DHEA from the
capsule administered was done. The detection of arimistane and
7-keto-DHEA was confirmed by the simultaneous analysis of the ref-
erence material. The signal for arimistane was observed to be around
30% of 3-acetyl-7-keto-DHEA, and a very low signal (below 5%) of
7-keto-DHEA could be observed. This is in agreement with a recent
publication on the analysis of 5-en-7-keto structures.
The three
compounds were analyzed by IRMS without any additional derivatiza-
tion and the δ
C values were 32.2,31.6, and 32.0for
3-acetyl-7-keto-DHEA, arimistane, and 7-keto-DHEA, respectively.
The homogeneous delta values obtained for the three compounds is
mainly related to the steroid core carbon structure.
According to the HPLC fractions obtained during the clean-up
and avoiding isotopic fractionation, only three metabolites were mea-
sured (the whole peak was included in a unique fraction). The 3α-
isomer of 7-keto-DHEA (I) showed a δ
mass 302.1874 Da, Δ2.6 ppm), the reduced metabolite II showed a
Cof31.2(non-derivative mass 304.2033 Da, Δ0.01 ppm),
and finally, the reduced metabolite Vshowed a δ
derivative mass 306.2186 Da, Δ0.2 ppm). The other metabolites
were not measured since they appeared in more than one fraction or
FIGURE 6 Formation of the arimistane-
TMS observed after the analysis of reference
material of trimethylsilyl 7-keto-DHEA by
GC-TOF, related to the different
derivatization composition used (MSTFA:
I: 2-mercaptoethanol)
FIGURE 7 Time course of proposed metabolites described in the study in the free + glucuronidate fraction (F + G) and sulfate fraction. MT:
Methyltestosterone used as internal standard
were interference. These additional IRMS data support the fact that
there is no back formation of DHEA from 7-keto-DHEA.
The detection of 7-keto-DHEA administration based on the endoge-
nous steroid profile of ABP and the consequent analysis by GC-C-
IRMS failed. The additional IRMS data on specific proposed metabo-
lites support the fact that there is no back formation of DHEA from
7-keto-DHEA. At the same time, the monitoring of 7α- and 7β-
hydroxylated metabolites to monitor DHEA administration has the old
and well-known disadvantage that both are substances that are pro-
duced physiologically and are found, albeit in traces, in urine samples.
The identification of specific metabolites is required.
After a single 100 mg oral dose of 7-keto-DHEA, ten proposed
metabolites, in addition to 7-keto-DHEA itself, were newly described
(not present in the blank urine pre-administration samples above the
LOD of the method). These include reduced and hydroxylated struc-
tures that are independent of the steroid profile. The described
metabolites showed considerable responses in both the F + G and S
fractions. Among them, there were four metabolites excreted in the
F + G for a longer time and at higher responses, two reduced (IV and
VI) and two tetrahydroxylated metabolites (IX and X). The proposed
structures are based on the accurate mass measurement and compari-
son with similar structure fragmentation patterns. Additional spectro-
metric techniques or the syntheses of the proposed structures are
needed for a definitive confirmation of the configurations.
Other compounds that can be linked to a degradation reaction by
deoxidation in positions 3 or 7 were found. In this sense, extreme care
should be taken when interpreting the results after the application of
procedures to detect steroids in urine currently in place in many
The presence of arimistane in concentrations higher than its 7β-
hydroxy metabolite could be an adequate marker of 7-keto-DHEA
administration because after administration of arimistane, arimistane
itself is almost undetectable in urine.
To disclose whether arimistane is or is not an in vivo metabolite
of 7-keto-DHEA requires the use of methodologies avoiding derivati-
zation and/or the removal of the sulfate moiety as liquid chromatogra-
phy coupled to mass spectrometry.
Dayamin Martinez-Brito
Xavier de la Torre
Francesco Botrè
1. WADA. The World Antidoping Code The 2019 Prohibited List
International Standard.
files/wada_2019_english_prohibited_list.pdf. Published 2019. (Last
accessed 10 June 2019)
2. WADA. TD2019IRMS - Detection of Synthetic Forms of Endogenous
Anabolic Androgenic Steroids by GC/C/IRMS. 2019. https://www.
Published 2019. (Last accessed 10 June 2019)
3. Davidson M. Safety and pharmacokinetic study with escalating doses
of 3-acetyl-7-oxo-dehydroepiandrosterone in healthy male volun-
teers. Clin Invest Med. 2000;23(5):300-310.
4. Lardy H, Kneer N, Wei Y, Partridge B, Marwah P. Ergosteroids II: bio-
logically active metabolites and synthetic derivatives of dehydroepi-
androsterone. Steroids. 1998;63(3):158-165.
5. Šulcová J, Hampl R, Hill M, Stárka L, Novácˇek A. Delayed effects of
short-term transdermal application of 7-oxo-dehydroepiandrosterone
on its metabolites, some hormonal steroids and relevant
proteohormones in healthy male volunteers. Clin Chem Lab Med.
6. Van Eenoo P, Delbeke FT. Metabolism and excretion of anabolic ste-
roids in doping control new steroids and new insights. J Steroid Bio-
chem Mol Biol. 2006;101(45):161-178. http://www.sciencedirect.
7. Okada M, Fukushima DK, Gallagher TF. Isolation and characterization
of 3β-hydroxy-Δ5-steroids in adrenal carcinoma. J Biol Chem. 1959;
8. Świzdor A, Panek A, Milecka-Tronina N. Biohydroxylation of 7-oxo-
DHEA, a natural metabolite of DHEA, resulting in formation of new
metabolites of potential pharmaceutical interest. Chem Biol Drug Des.
9. Nickon A, Bagli JF. Reactivity and geometry in allylic systems.
I. Stereochemistry of photosensitized oxygenation of monoolefins.
J Am Chem Soc. 1961;83(6):1498-1508.
10. Marwah A, Marwah P, Lardy H. Ergosteroids VII: perchloric acid-
induced transformations of 7-oxygenated steroids and their bio-
analytical applications a liquid chromatographic-mass spectrometric
study. Bioorg Chem. 2002;30(4):233-248.
11. Numazawa M, Mutsumi A, Hoshi K, Tanaka Y. Androst-5-ene-7,-
17-dione: a novel class of suicide substrate of aromatase. Biochem
Biophys Res Commun. 1992;186(1):32-39.
12. Numazawa M, Tachibana M. Studies directed toward a mechanistic
evaluation of aromatase inhibition by androst-5-ene-7,17-dione:
time-dependent inactivation by the 19-nor and 5β,6β-epoxy deriva-
tives. Steroids. 1997;62(7):516-522.
13. Numazawa M, Mutsumi A, Tachibana M, Hoshi K. Synthesis of
androst-5-en-7-ones and androsta-3,5-dien-7-ones and their related
7-deoxy analogs as conformational and catalytic probes for the active
site of aromatase. J Med Chem. 1994;37(14):2198-2205. https://doi.
14. Torrado S, Roig M, Farré M, Segura J, Ventura R. Urinary metabolic
profile of 19-norsteroids in humans: glucuronide and sulphate conju-
gates after oral administration of 19-nor-4-androstenediol. Rapid
Commun Mass Spectrom. 2008;22(19):3035-3042.
15. Fragkaki AG, Angelis YS, Kiousi P, Georgakopoulos CG, Lyris E. Com-
parison of sulfo-conjugated and gluco-conjugated urinary metabolites
for detection of methenolone misuse in doping control by LC-HRMS,
GC-MS and GC-HRMS. J Mass Spectrom. 2015;50(5):740-748.
16. Rzeppa S, Heinrich G, Hemmersbach P. Analysis of anabolic
androgenic steroids as sulfate conjugates using high performance liq-
uid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry. Drug
Test Anal. 2015;7(1112):1030-1039.
17. Rzeppa S, Viet L. Analysis of sulfate metabolites of the doping agents
oxandrolone and danazol using high performance liquid
chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr
B. 2016;10291030:1-9.
18. Piper T, Schänzer W, Thevis M. Revisiting the metabolism of
19-nortestosterone using isotope ratio and high resolution/high accu-
racy mass spectrometry. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2016;162:80-91.
19. Shackleton CHL. Profiling steroid hormones and urinary steroids.
J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl. 1986;379:91-156.
20. Stanley SM, Kent S, Rodgers J. Biotransformation of 17-alkyl steroids
in the equine: high-performance liquid chromatographymass spec-
trometric and gas chromatographymass spectrometric analysis of
fluoxymesterone metabolites in urine samples. J Chromatogr B Biomed
Sci Appl. 1997;704(12):119-128.
21. Hauser B, Deschner T, Boesch C. Development of a liquid
chromatographytandem mass spectrometry method for the determi-
nation of 23 endogenous steroids in small quantities of primate urine.
J Chromatogr B. 2008;862(12):100-112.
22. Declaration of Helsinki (1964). Recommendations guiding physicians
in biomedical research involving human subjects. BMJ. 1996;313
23. Lorenz LM, Toomey VM, Lanzarotta AC, Flurer RA, Falconer TM.
Identification of the designer steroid androsta-3,5-diene-7,17-dione
in a dietary supplement. Drug Test Anal. 2019;11(7):1109-1115,
24. de la Torre X, Colamonici C, Curcio D, Botrè F. Fast IRMS screening
of pseudoendogenous steroids in doping analyses. Drug Test Anal.
25. Martinez Brito D, Notarianni M, Iannone M, Botrè F, de La Torre X.
Validation of sulphates deconjugation for metabolic studies. XXXVII
Manfred Donike Work Dope Anal. 2019.
26. de la Torre X, Colamonici C, Curcio D, Molaioni F, Botrè F. A compre-
hensive procedure based on gas chromatography-isotope ratio mass
spectrometry following high performance liquid chromatography
purification for the analysis of underivatized testosterone and its ana-
logues in human urine. Anal Chim Acta. 2012;756(0):23-29. https://
27. Hampl R, Lapcˇík O, Hill M, et al. 7-Hydroxydehydroepiandrosterone
a natural antiglucocorticoid and a candidate for steroid replacement
therapy? Physiol Res. 2000;49(S1):S107-S112.
28. Delbeke FT, Van Eenoo P, Van Thuyne W, Desmet N. Prohormones
and sport. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2002;83(15):245-251. https://
29. Cawley AT, George AV. Complementary stable carbon isotope ratio
and amount of substance measurements in sports anti-doping. Drug
Test Anal. 2012;4(12):897-911.
30. Flórez J, Armijo JA, Mediavilla A. Farmacologia Humana
31. Goodman G. In: Brunton LL, ed. The Pharmacological Basis of Thera-
peutics. Eleventh v. New York, USA: McGraw-Hill; 2006.
32. Zumoff B, Bradlow HL. Sex difference in the metabolism of
dehydroisoandrosterone sulfate*.J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1980;51(2):
33. Zumoff B, Rosenfeld RS, Strain GW, Levin J, Fukushima DK. Sex dif-
ferences in the twenty-four-hour mean plasma concentrations of
dehydroisoandrosterone (DHA) and dehydroisoandrosterone sulfate
(DHAS) and the DHA to DHAS ratio in normal adults*.J Clin
Endocrinol Metab. 1980;51(2):330-333.
34. Frye RF, Kroboth PD, Kroboth FJ, et al. Sex differences in the phar-
macokinetics of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) after single- and
multiple-dose administration in healthy older adults. J Clin Pharmacol.
10868310. Accessed 8 August 2019
35. Van Renterghem P, Van Eenoo P, Geyer H, Schänzer W, Delbeke FT.
Reference ranges for urinary concentrations and ratios of endoge-
nous steroids, which can be used as markers for steroid misuse, in a
Caucasian population of athletes. Steroids. 2010;75(2):154-163.
36. Dehennin L, Ferry M, Lafarge P, Pérès G, Lafarge J-P. Oral administra-
tion of dehydroepiandrosterone to healthy men: alteration of the uri-
nary androgen profile and consequences for the detection of abuse in
sport by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Steroids. 1998;63
37. Shelby MK, Crouch DJ, Black DL, Robert TA, Heltsley R. Screening
indicators of dehydroepiandosterone, androstenedione, and dihydro-
testosterone use: a literature review. J Anal Toxicol. 2011;35(9):638-
38. Van Renterghem P, Van Eenoo P, Sottas P-E, Saugy M, Delbeke F.
Subject-based steroid profiling and the determination of novel bio-
markers for DHT and DHEA misuse in sports. Drug Test Anal. 2010;2
39. Cawley A, Hine E, Trout G, George A, Kazlauskas R. Searching for
new markers of endogenous steroid administration in athletes:
looking outside the metabolic box..Forensic Sci Int. 2004;143(23):
40. Brooks CJW, Johnson AW, Beynon JH. Some aspects of mass spec-
trometry in research on steroids. Philos Trans R Soc London Ser a, Math
Phys Sci. 1979;293(1400):53-67.
41. Harvey DJ, Vouros P. Influence of the 6-trimethylsilyl group on the
fragmentation of the trimethylsilyl derivatives of some 6-hydroxy-
and 3,6-dihydroxy-steroids and related compounds. Biomed Mass
Spectrom. 1979;6(4):135-143.
42. Numazawa M, Nagaoka M, Matsuzaki H, Yamashita K, Komatsu S,
Osawa Y. Mechanistic aspects of rearrangement of 16α-hydroxy-
17-keto steroids to the 17β-hydroxy-16-keto isomers. Steroids. 2008;
43. Martinez Brito D, Torre X, Botrè F. Detection of urinary metabolites
of arimistane in humans by gas chromatography coupled to high accu-
racy mass spectrometry for antidoping analyses. Rapid Commun Mass
Spectrom. 2019;33(24):1894-1905.
How to cite this article: Martinez-Brito D, de la Torre X,
Colamonici C, Curcio D, Botrè F. 7-keto-DHEAmetabolism in
humans. Pitfalls in interpreting the analytical results in the
antidoping field. Drug Test Anal. 2019;11:16291643. https://
... As little is known about the metabolism of 7-oxo-DHEA, the samples collected during the excretion study were also analyzed by high resolution/high accuracy mass spectrometric methods in order to identify novel metabolites, [8][9][10] allowing us also to compare some of the results with those from an earlier study. 11 In order to further corroborate the conversion of 7-oxo-DHEA into metabolites present in the blank urine (i.e. endogenously occurring steroids) and to support structural elucidation, the excretion study was repeated with deuterium-labeled 7-oxo-DHEA. ...
... This disadvantageous conversion of 7-oxo-DHEA has been described for the derivatization process before, and the labile character of this steroid towards basic conditions was corroborated here. 11 Adopting the reaction conditions as described employing a weaker base resulted in a two-fold deuteration exclusively within the steroidal D-ring. In Figure 1, the corresponding mass spectra of the deuterated and the native steroid are presented for both the acetylated and the trimethylsilylated compound. ...
... A substantial number of metabolites was detected within the first 24 h post-administration, some of which have recently been reported, and others that had not yet been described. 11 In total, seven metabolites were found in the fraction of unconjugated steroids, 20 in the fraction of glucurono-conjugated steroids, and 14 in the fraction of sulfated steroids. All these were also identified after the administration of unlabeled 7-oxo-DHEA (Table 4) and further investigated regarding their potential for sports drug testing purposes. ...
Full-text available
Rationale: The misuse of 7-oxo-DHEA (3β-hydroxyandrost-5-ene-7,17-dione) is prohibited according to the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) code. Nevertheless, it is easily available as a dietary supplement and from black market sources. In two recent doping control samples, significant amounts of its main metabolite 7β-OH-DHEA were identified, necessitating further investigations. Methods: As both 7-oxo-DHEA and 7β-OH-DHEA are endogenously produced steroids and no concentration thresholds, applicable to routine doping controls, exist, the development and validation of a carbon isotope ratio (CIR) mass spectrometry method has been desirable. Excretion studies encompassing 7-oxo-DHEA, 7-oxo-DHEA-acetate, and in-house deuterated 7-oxo-DHEA were conducted and evaluated with regard to urinary CIR and potential new metabolites of 7-oxo-DHEA. Results: Numerous urinary metabolites were identified, some of which have not been reported before while others corroborate earlier findings on the metabolism of 7-oxo-DHEA. The CIRs of both 7-oxo-DHEA and 7β-OH-DHEA were significantly influenced for more than 50 h after a single oral dose of 100 mg, and a novel metabolite (5α-androstane-3β,7β-diol-17-one) was found to prolong this detection time window by approximately 25 h. Applying the validated method to routine doping control specimens presenting atypically high urinary 7β-OH-DHEA levels clearly demonstrated the exogenous origin of 7-oxo-DHEA and 7β-OH-DHEA. Conclusion: As established for other endogenously produced steroids such as testosterone, the CIR allows for a clear differentiation between endo- and exogenous sources of 7-oxo-DHEA and 7β-OH-DHEA. The novel metabolites detected after administration may help to improve the detection of 7-oxo-DHEA misuse and simplifies its detection in doping control specimens.
... The derivatives of 7-oxo-or 7-hydroxy-DHEA with an additional 16a-hydroxy group were isolated from urine of the patient with adrenal carcinoma (Pouzar et al., 2005). More recently, numerous new reduced and hydroxylated metabolites of 7-oxo-DHEA (1) were detected in human urine, but the structures of these compounds need to be confirmed, due to, among other things, the lack of adequate reference materials (Martinez-Brito et al., 2019;Piper et al., 2020). ...
... The spectroscopic data (Fig. S1-S6) led to the identification of this metabolite as 3b,16b-dihydroxy-androst-5-en-7,17-dione (6). An interesting connection to mammalian metabolism is provided by recent studies suggesting the presence of multihydroxy compounds with 16b-alcohol group in human urinary metabolic profile of 7-oxo-DHEA after oral administration of this steroid (Martinez-Brito et al., 2019). ...
Full-text available
Seventeen species of fungi belonging to thirteen genera were screened for the ability to carry out the transformation of 7-oxo-DHEA (7-oxo-dehydroepiandrosterone). Some strains expressed new patterns of catalytic activity towards the substrate, namely 16β-hydroxylation (Laetiporus sulphureus AM498), Baeyer-Villiger oxidation of ketone in D-ring to lactone (Fusicoccum amygdali AM258) and esterification of the 3β-hydroxy group (Spicaria divaricata AM423). The majority of examined strains were able to reduce the 17-oxo group of the substrate to form 3β,17β-dihydroxy-androst-5-en-7-one. The highest activity was reached with Armillaria mellea AM296 and Ascosphaera apis AM496 for which complete conversion of the starting material was achieved, and the resulting 17β-alcohol was the sole reaction product. Two strains of tested fungi were also capable of stereospecific reduction of the conjugated 7-keto group leading to 7β-hydroxy-DHEA (Inonotus radiatus AM70) or a mixture of 3β,7α,17β-trihydroxy-androst-5-ene and 3β,7β,17β-trihydroxy-androst-5-ene (Piptoporus betulinus AM39). The structures of new metabolites were confirmed by MS and NMR analysis. They were also examined for their cholinesterase inhibitory activity in an enzymatic-based assay in vitro test.
... As a conclusion, the analyses of the trimethylsilyl derivatives of the extracts did not allow to determine whether the arimistane is a direct metabolite of 7-oxo-DHEA or it is an artifact produced during the sample preparation. 11 The goal of this work was to develop an LC/MS method that would allow avoiding derivatization reactions and high temperatures of the injector port, to investigate the stability of the 7-oxo-DHEA in two different solvents, and the arimistane formation after the application of the procedures commonly used for metabolic studies in antidoping and forensic field. Additionally, both in vitro metabolism assays and controlled administration studies on 7-oxo-DHEA were performed. ...
Full-text available
Rationale: The instability of androst-5-ene-3,7-dione structures under acidic conditions is known. The formation of arimistane from 7-oxo-DHEA, influenced by the conditions of sample extraction, and mainly derivatization reaction and GC injector temperature, was described earlier, potentially leading to misinterpretation of results. By using an LC-MS we investigated the stability of the 7-oxo-DHEA in two different solvents (methanol and dimethylsulfoxide), and the arimistane formation after the application common analytical procedures. Additionally, in vitro and in vivo studies of 7-oxo-DHEA were performed. Methods: The stability of 7-oxo-DHEA was studied in solutions after 60 days storage at -20°C. In vitro studies were performed by incubating 7-oxo-DHEA with human liver microsomes (HLM). Healthy volunteers collected urine samples before and after the administration of a single dose of 7-oxo-DHEA. Analyses were performed using liquid chromatography (HPLC) coupled to a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (MS/MS) and GC-C-IRMS following HPLC purification. Results: 7-oxo-DHEA was stable after 60 days in DMSO while a protic solvent as methanol promotes the degradation of 7-oxo-DHEA to arimistane. HLM incubations showed no formation of arimistane and the sample preparation only influenced the degradation of 7-oxo-DHEA when solvolysis was applied. After the administration study the presence of arimistane also after the hydrolysis with β-glucuronidase (E. coli) was observed while using β-glucuronidase/arylsulfatase (H. pomatia) showed the presence of arimistane already in blank samples collected before administration. Conclusions: Our results confirm arimistane as a valuable diagnostic marker of 7-oxo-DHEA administration, but also indicate that its formation is due to degradation processes rather than to metabolic biotransformation reactions.
... 4 To avoid additional variables, the sample preparation procedure applied was the same as in the GC/qTOF study, except for the absence of the trimethylsilyl derivatization, which represents the main cause of the artifact formation, hindering the elucidation of the molecular structure of some 7-oxo compounds. 6 3.1 | LC/qTOF results ...
Full-text available
Rationale: The metabolism of arimistane (Arim) was firstly described in 2015 and androst-3,5-diene-7β-ol-17-one was proposed as the main metabolite excreted in urine. Recently, a more detailed study describing the findings in urine after the administration of Arim has been published. This study corroborated the previously described metabolite, but also described several phase I and II metabolites, analyzing trimethylsilylated urinary extracts by accurate mass spectrometry coupled to gas chromatography (GC/qTOF). The present communication is an extension of this late investigation aiming to implement the results of Arim metabolism using either accurate mass spectrometry and/or triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometry, both coupled to liquid chromatography (LC/qTOF and LC/QqQ). Methods: Samples used in this study were the same as previously studied by GC/qTOF. One single oral dose of Arim was administered to three volunteers and samples collected before and up to 10 hours after the Arim administration were analyzed. The unconjugated fraction of urine was removed, and the hydrolysis was performed with β-glucuronidase from E. coli. The extracts were reconstituted in water: acetonitrile before the LC/qTOF and LC/QqQ analysis. Results: The presence of the proposed metabolites studied by GC was verified by accurate mass measurements. Twelve metabolites not found in the blank urines were identified by the accurate mass spectra with acceptable errors between -7.5 and 8.1 ppm: 4 reduced metabolites, 4 mono-hydroxylated metabolites, and 4 with an additional hydroxylation (bis-hydroxylated metabolites). Unlike in the study carried out by GC/qTOF, Arim itself was found in the samples of the three volunteers. Conclusions: Twelve metabolites were identified, and specific transitions were proposed. Despite the good results, some limitations remain. As for GC/qTOF, the α or β configuration of hydroxy groups cannot be assigned with certainty, as well as the exact position for some unsaturation. Since certified reference materials of these metabolites are not yet available, the molecular structures were hypothesized considering the previous study by GC.
... In case of suspicious steroid profile data or atypical passport findings, offering extended detection windows and, thus, potential triggers for follow-up GC/C/IRMS analyses. 89 Of note, here, the 3α-configuration was postulated, especially due to the conjugation to glucuronic acid in vivo, while at least the confirmed 5α-androstane-3β,7β-diol-17-one metabolite of the aforementioned study exhibited a 3β-configuration. ...
Full-text available
Analytical chemistry‐based research in sports drug testing has been a dynamic endeavor for several decades, with technology‐driven innovations continuously contributing to significant improvements in various regards including analytical sensitivity, comprehensiveness of target analytes, differentiation of natural/endogenous substances from structurally identical but synthetically derived compounds, assessment of alternative matrices for doping control purposes, etc. The resulting breadth of tools being investigated and developed by anti‐doping researchers has allowed to substantially improve anti‐doping programs and data interpretation in general. Additionally, these outcomes have been an extremely valuable pledge for routine doping controls during the unprecedented global health crisis that severely affected established sports drug testing strategies. In this edition of the annual banned‐substance review, literature on recent developments in anti‐doping published between October 2019 and September 2020 is summarized and discussed, particularly focusing on human doping controls and potential applications of new testing strategies to substances and methods of doping specified the World Anti‐Doping Agency’s 2020 Prohibited List.
... The detection of the abuse of 7-oxo-DHEA in sports has been recently addressed by isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS) 19 since this compound is naturally produced in humans and found in urine samples. In order to decide which sample deserves to be analyzed by this technique, the estimation of the concentrations of 7-oxo-DHEA is needed to evaluate if they are outside the physiological ranges. ...
Full-text available
Rationale Several authors have described the generation of androsta‐3,5‐diene‐7‐one structures from androst‐5‐ene‐3,7‐dione or androst‐5‐ene‐3β‐ol‐7‐one under acidic conditions and/or high temperatures. The goal of this paper was to observe and to describe the results obtained after the chromatographic analysis of the trimethylsilyl derivatives of reference materials of 7‐oxo‐DHEA, 7α‐hydroxy‐DHEA, 7β‐hydroxy‐DHEA, and androsta‐3,5‐diene‐7,17‐dione known as Arimistane. Methods The purity of the analytes reference material was verified by liquid chromatography‐ quadrupole mass spectrometry. The trimethylsilyl derivatives obtained using several mixtures with MSTFA (N‐methyl‐N‐trimethylsilyl trifluoroacetamide) in comparison with solely MSTFA were analyzed by gas chromatography coupled to a time of flight detector equipped with a multimode inlet or to a simple quadrupole detector with a split/splitless inlet. Results The study showed that the formation of arimistane from 7‐oxo‐DHEA occurs using common derivatization reagents used for the analyses by GC. In addition, the formation of the enolized TMS derivative of 7‐oxo‐DHEA was observed in considerable amount when it was reacted with MSTFA. The analysis of 7α‐hydroxy‐DHEA resulted in ~1 % of arimistane being detected. The formation of unexpected artifacts from derivatization is influenced by the reagent itself, the reaction temperature, the inlet used and its configuration. Conclusions The derivatization reagent, instrument conditions (inlet), as well as the chemical structures of the analytes present in the matrix can influence the results. So, before describing a new feature as a potential “new” metabolite, special caution must be taken since we could actually be dealing with an artifact.
For decades, anabolic androgenic agents have represented the substance class most frequently observed in doping control samples. They comprise synthetic and pseudoendogenous anabolic androgenic steroids and other, mostly non-steroidal compounds with (presumed) positive effects on muscle mass and function. While exogenous substances can easily be detected by gas/liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry, significantly more complex methodologies including the longitudinal monitoring of individual urinary steroid concentrations/ratios and isotope ratio mass spectrometry are required to provide evidence for the exogenous administration of endogenous compounds. This narrative review summarizes the efforts made within the last 5 years to further improve the detection of anabolic agents in doping control samples. Different approaches such as the identification of novel metabolites and biomarkers, the acquisition of complementary mass spectrometric data, and the development of new analytical strategies were employed to increase method sensitivity and retrospectivity while simultaneously reducing method complexity to facilitate a higher and faster sample throughput.
Rationale: This work demonstrated the high potential of combining high-resolution mass spectrometry with chemometric tools, using metabolomics as a guided tool for anti-doping analysis. The administration of 7-keto-DHEA was studied as a proof-of-concept of the effectiveness of the combination of knowledge-based and machine-learning approaches to differentiate the changes due to the athletic activities from those due to the recourse to doping substances and methods. Methods: Urine samples were collected from 5 healthy volunteers before and after an oral administration by identifying three-time intervals. Raw data were acquired by injecting less than one microliter of derivatized samples into an Agilent Technologies 8890 Gas Chromatograph coupled to an Agilent Technologies 7250 Accurate-Mass Quadrupole Time-of-Flight, by using a low energy electron ionization source, and then they were preprocessed to align peak retention times with the same accurate mass. The resulting data table was subjected to multivariate analysis. Results: Multivariate analysis showed a high similarity between the samples belonging to the same collection interval and a clear separation between the different excretion intervals. The discrimination between blank and long excretion groups may suggest the presence of long excretion markers, which are particularly significant in anti-doping analysis. Furthermore, matching the most significant features with some of the metabolites reported in the literature data demonstrated the rationality of the proposed metabolomics-based approach. Conclusions: The application of metabolomics tools as an investigation strategy could reduce the time and resources required to identify and characterize intake markers maximizing the information that can be extracted from the data and extending the research field by avoiding a priori bias. Therefore, metabolic fingerprinting of prohibited substance intakes could be an appropriate analytical approach to reduce the risk of false-positive/negative results, aiding in the interpretation of "abnormal" profiles and discrimination of pseudo-endogenous steroid intake in the anti-doping field.
Full-text available
Rationale: The selection of the more appropriate metabolites of the substances included in the Prohibited List of the World Antidoping Agency (WADA) is fundamental for setting up methods allowing the detection of their intake by mass spectrometric methods. The aim of this work is to investigate the metabolism of arimistane (an aromatase inhibitor included in the WADA list) in order to improve its detection capacity among the antidoping community. Methods: Urinary samples collected after controlled single administration of arimistane in 3 healthy volunteers were analyzed using the common routine sample preparation in antidoping laboratories to determine the steroid profile parameters considered in the steroid module of the Athletes' Biological Passport by gas chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (GC/MS/MS). For the elucidation of the proposed metabolites, GC coupled to high accuracy mass spectrometry (GC/qTOFMS) was used. Both mass spectrometers were operated in electron ionization (EI) mode. Non-conjugated (free), glucuronated and suphated fractions were analyzed separately. Results: No relevant effects on the steroid profile could be detected after a single oral dose (15 mg). Up to 15 metabolites, present only in the post-administration samples, were detected and some structures were postulated. These metabolites are mainly excreted as glucuro-conjugated into urine and only minor amounts of two metabolites are also excreted unconjugated or as sulphates. Conclusions: Arimistane itself was not observed in the free or glucuronated fractions, but only in the sulphate fraction. The peaks showing mass spectra in agreement with hydroxylated metabolites did not match with those for 7-keto-DHEA, 7α- or 7β-hydroxy-DHEA. This suggests that the first hydroxylation did not occur on C3, but on C2. These newly described metabolites allow the specific detection of arimistane misuse in sports.
Full-text available
The detection of the abuse of pseudoendogenous steroids (testosterone and/or its precursors) is currently based, when possible, on the application of the steroid module of the World Antidoping Agency (WADA), Athletes’ Biological Passport (ABP), implemented through ADAMS. When a suspicious sample is detected, the confirmation by isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS) is required. It is well known that this confirmation procedure is time consuming, expensive and can be only applied on a reduced number of samples. In previous studies we have demonstrated that the longitudinal evaluation of the IRMS data is able to detect positive samples that otherwise will be evaluated as negative, improving the efficacy of the fight against doping in sport. This would require the analysis of a much larger volume of samples by IRMS. The aim of the present work is to describe an IRMS screening method allowing to increase the throughput of samples that can be analyzed by IRMS. The detection efficacy of the method is compared with the confirmation method in use, and to assess its robustness and applicability, all the samples of a major cycling stage competition were analyzed, with the agreement of the testing authority, under routine conditions and response times. The results obtained permit to conclude that the IRMS screening method here proposed has adequate selectivity and produces results that overlap with the already validated method currently in use permitting to analyze a much higher volume of samples even during a major event without compromising the detection capacity.
A liquid chromatography mass spectral detection (LC‐MS) screen for known anabolic‐androgenic steroids in a dietary supplement product marketed for “performance enhancement” detected an unknown compound having steroid‐like spectral characteristics. The compound was isolated using high performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection (HPLC‐UV) coupled with an analytical scale fraction collector. After the compound was isolated, it was then characterized using gas chromatography with simultaneous Fourier Transform infrared detection and mass spectral detection (GC/FT‐IR/MS), liquid chromatography‐high resolution accurate mass‐mass spectrometry (LCHRAM‐MS) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). The steroid had an accurate mass of m/z 285.1847 (error is ‐0.57 ppm) for the protonated species [M+H]+, corresponding to a molecular formula of C19H24O2. Based on the GC/FT‐IR/MS data, NMR data, and accurate mass, the compound was identified as androsta‐3,5‐diene‐7,17‐dione. Although this is not the first reported identification of this designer steroid in a dietary supplement, the data provided adds additional information for identification of this compound not previously reported. This compound was subsequently detected in another dietary supplement product, which contained three additional active ingredients.
Surface cleaning remains essential for the sustainable operation of high performance solar thermal receivers. Cleaning of optical surfaces, such as solar troughs and absorbers, requires energy intensive efforts because of the large surface area involvement such as those observed in solar farms. In addition, self‐cleaning of such surfaces becomes demanding because of lowering the cleaning costs, reducing the waste of resources, such as clean water, and minimizing the complication of the mechanical systems incorporated. Self‐cleaning of surfaces is associated with the low adhesion between the surface and the foreign particles; in which case, these particles can be removed easily from the surfaces in a cost‐effective way. The surface energy and contact area of the surface are two main important parameters influencing the particle adhesion on the surfaces. In this case, reducing the surface energy and forming micro/nano size pillars on the surface through texturing lower the particle adhesion on the surfaces significantly. In solar thermal energy harvesting applications, metallic or composite materials are used and texturing the surface remains challenging in terms of cost and precision of operation when conventional texturing methods are used. One of the methods to create surface texture consisting of micro/nano pillars is to use the laser beam ablation. This results in hierarchical distribution of surface texture with desired pillar heights1. In addition, laser surface texturing offers significant advantages over the conventional techniques. Some of these advantages include fast processing, precision of operation, and low cost. Although the laser processing involves with high temperature processing and thermally induced stresses remain important, the defects sites can be minimized via controlling the process parameters during the texturing. Introducing the assisting gas on the texturing surface enables to generate compounds such as oxide or nitride species, which lower the surface energy considerably. Consequently, investigation of laser texturing of solar energy materials while incorporating the assisting gas becomes essential. In the present perspective, the laser surface texturing of solar energy materials for thermal power applications is presented together with challenges and future perspectives. Specifically, the followings will be presented: (1) the texture characteristics of laser treated metallic and ceramic surfaces; (2) wetting state of the textured surface, and optical properties of textured surface in terms of absorption of the solar irradiation.
Metabolism of steroids in healthy and unhealthy human organs is the subject of extensive clinical and biomedical studies. For this kind of investigations, it is essential that the reference samples of derivatives of new derivatives of natural, physiologically active steroids (especially those difficult to achieve in the chemical synthesis) become available. This paper demonstrated for the first time transformation of 7-oxo-DHEA - a natural metabolite of DHEA, by using Syncephalastrum racemosum cells. The single-pulse fermentation of substrate produced two new hydroxy metabolites: 1β,3β-dihydroxy-androst-5-en-7,17-dione, and 3β,12β-dihydroxy-androst-5-en-7,17-dione, along with the earlier reported 3β,9α-dihydroxy-androst-5-en-7,17-dione and 3β,17β-dihydroxy-androst-5-en-7-one. Simultaneously, the same metabolites, together with small quantities of 7α- and 7β-hydroxy-DHEA, as well as the products of their reduction at the C-17 were obtained after transformation of DHEA under pulse-feeding of the substrate. The observed reactions suggested that this microorganism contains enzymes exhibiting similar activity to those present in human cells. Thus, the resulting compounds can be considered as potential components of the eukaryotic, including human, metabolome. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
The direct detection of sulfate conjugates of anabolic androgenic steroids (AAS) can be a powerful tool in doping control analysis. By skipping the solvolysis step analysis time can be reduced, and due to long term sulfate metabolites the detection time can be significantly extended as demonstrated for some AAS. This study presents the successful identification of sulfate metabolites of the doping agents oxandrolone and danazol in excretion urines by high performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS). The sulfate conjugate of 17β-hydroxymethyl-17α-methyl-18-nor-2-oxa-5α-androsta-13-en-3-one could be identified as a new metabolite of oxandrolone. Sulfate conjugates of the danazol metabolites ethisterone and 2α-hydroxymethylethisterone were identified in an excretion urine for the first time. In addition, these sulfate conjugates were synthesized successfully. For a confirmation analysis, the number of analytes can be increased by additional sulfate conjugates of danazol metabolites (2-hydroxymethyl-1,2-dehydroethisterone and 6β-hydroxy-2-hydroxymethylethisterone), which were also identified for the first time. The presented validation data underline the suitability of the identified sulfate conjugates for doping analysis with regard to the criteria given by the technical documents of the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA).
The synthetic anabolic androgenic steroid 19-nortestosterone is prohibited in sports according to the regulations of the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) due to its performance-enhancing effects. Today, doping controls focus predominantly on one main urinary metabolite, 19-norandrosterone glucuronide, which offers the required detection windows for an appropriate retrospectivity of sports drug testing programs. As 19-norandrosterone can also be found in urine at low concentrations originating from in situ demethylation of other abundant steroids or from endogenous production, the exogenous source of 19-norandrosterone needs to be verified, which is commonly accomplished by carbon isotope ratio analyses. The aim of this study was to re-investigate the metabolism of 19-nortestosterone in order to probe for additional diagnostic long-term metabolites, which might support the unambiguous attribution of an endo- or exogenous source of detected 19-nortestosterone metabolites. Employing a recently introduced strategy for metabolite identification, threefold deuterated 19-nortestosterone (16,16,17-²H3-NT) was administered to one healthy male volunteer and urine samples were collected for 20 days. Samples were prepared with established methods separating unconjugated, glucuronidated and sulfated steroids, and analytes were further purified by means of high-performance liquid chromatography before trimethylsilylation. Deuterated metabolites were identified using gas chromatograph/thermal conversion/isotope ratio mass spectrometer comprising an additional single quadrupole mass spectrometer. Additional structural information was obtained by gas chromatography/time-of-flight mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography/high resolution mass spectrometry. In general, sulfo-conjugated metabolites were excreted for a longer time period than the corresponding glucuronides. Several unexpected losses of the arguably stable isotope labels were observed and characterized, attributed to metabolic reactions and sample preparation procedures. The detection window of one of the newly detected metabolites was higher than currently used metabolites. The suitability of this metabolite to differentiate between endo- or exogenous sources could however not be verified conclusively.
Improvements in doping analysis can be effected by speeding up analysis time and extending the detection time. Therefore, direct detection of phase II conjugates of doping agents, especially anabolic androgenic steroids (AAS), is proposed. Besides direct detection of conjugates with glucuronic acid, the analysis of sulfate conjugates, which are usually not part of the routine doping control analysis, can be of high interest. Sulfate conjugates of methandienone and methyltestosterone metabolites have already been identified as long-term metabolites. This study presents the synthesis of sulfate conjugates of six commonly used AAS and their metabolites: trenbolone, nandrolone, boldenone, methenolone, mesterolone, and drostanolone. In the following these sulfate conjugates were used for development of a fast and easy analysis method based on sample preparation using solid phase extraction with a mixed-mode sorbent and detection by high performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS). Validation demonstrated the suitability of the method with regard to the criteria given by the technical documents of the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA). In addition, suitability has been proven by successful detection of the synthesized sulfate conjugates in excretion urines and routine doping control samples. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.