ArticlePublisher preview available

High-Achieving Schools Connote Risks for Adolescents: Problems Documented, Processes Implicated, and Directions for Interventions

Authors:
  • National Coalition of Independent Scholars
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract

Excessive pressures to excel, generally in affluent contexts, are now listed among the top 4 "high risk" factors for adolescents' mental health, along with exposure to poverty, trauma, and discrimination. Multiple studies of high-achieving school (HAS) cohorts have shown elevated rates of serious symptoms relative to norms, with corroborating evidence from other research using diverse designs. Grounded in theories on resilience and ecological influences in development, a conceptual model is presented here on major risk and protective processes implicated in unrelenting achievement pressures facing HAS youth. These include forces at the macrolevel, including economic and technological changes that have led to the "middle class squeeze," and proximal influences involving the family, peers, schools, and communities. Also considered are potential directions for future interventions, with precautions about some practices that are currently widespread in HAS contexts. In the years ahead, any meaningful reductions in the high distress of HAS youth will require collaborations among all stakeholders, with parents and educators targeting the specific areas that must be prioritized in their own communities. Leaders in higher education and social policy could also help in beginning to curtail this problem, which is truly becoming an epidemic among today's youth. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
High-Achieving Schools Connote Risks for Adolescents: Problems
Documented, Processes Implicated, and Directions for Interventions
Suniya S. Luthar
Arizona State University and Columbia University’s
Teachers College
Nina L. Kumar
Authentic Connections, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Nicole Zillmer
Arizona State University
Excessive pressures to excel, generally in affluent contexts, are now listed among the top 4
“high risk” factors for adolescents’ mental health, along with exposure to poverty, trauma,
and discrimination. Multiple studies of high-achieving school (HAS) cohorts have shown
elevated rates of serious symptoms relative to norms, with corroborating evidence from other
research using diverse designs. Grounded in theories on resilience and ecological influences
in development, a conceptual model is presented here on major risk and protective processes
implicated in unrelenting achievement pressures facing HAS youth. These include forces at
the macrolevel, including economic and technological changes that have led to the “middle
class squeeze,” and proximal influences involving the family, peers, schools, and communi-
ties. Also considered are potential directions for future interventions, with precautions about
some practices that are currently widespread in HAS contexts. In the years ahead, any
meaningful reductions in the high distress of HAS youth will require collaborations among
all stakeholders, with parents and educators targeting the specific areas that must be priori-
tized in their own communities. Leaders in higher education and social policy could also help
in beginning to curtail this problem, which is truly becoming an epidemic among today’s
youth.
Public Significance Statement
Major policy reports have now declared youth in high-achieving schools to be an at-risk group.
Following a summary of findings documenting elevated problems, this article describes the complex,
multilevel factors that eventuate in high levels of pressure. Also reviewed are interventions that might
reduce stress levels and promote positive well-being.
Keywords: affluence, socioeconomic status, risk, resilience, high-achieving schools (HAS)
Developmental scientists have increasingly argued that
youth in high-achieving settings are an “at-risk group” (for
a review see Luthar & Kumar, 2018, p. 441), and now, two
major national policy reports have clearly stated this (Wal-
lace, 2019). In a consensus study on maximizing equity in
children’s well-being, the National Academies of Science,
Engineering and Medicine (NASEM, 2019) indicated that
exposure to elevated levels of chronic stress applies to
youth at high as well as low levels of socioeconomic
status (SES). “Studies using varied samples and methods
have converged in indicating relatively high levels of
adjustment problems, likely linked with long-standing,
ubiquitous pressures to excel at academics and extracur-
riculars (among) students attending high-achieving
schools (HASs)” (NASEM, 2019, pp. 4–24). The sum-
marized conclusion echoes that from a Robert Wood
Johnson Foundation report on adolescent wellness (Geisz
& Nakashian, 2018); that is, that exposure to excessive
This article was published Online First November 7, 2019.
XSuniya S. Luthar, Department of Psychology, Arizona State Univer-
sity, and Department of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, Columbia
University’s Teachers College; XNina L. Kumar, Authentic Connections,
Cambridge, Massachusetts; Nicole Zillmer, Mary Lou Fulton Teachers
College, Arizona State University.
Nicole Zillmer is now an Independent Scholar, Phoenix, Arizona.
This article was supported by funding from Authentic Connections,
which was founded by Suniya S. Luthar, who also serves as the organiza-
tion’s Executive Director. Nina Kumar is Chief Executive Officer of
Authentic Connections.
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Suniya S.
Luthar, Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, 950 South
McAllister Street, Tempe, AZ 85287. E-mail: sluthar@asu.edu
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
American Psychologist
© 2019 American Psychological Association 2020, Vol. 75, No. 7, 983–995
ISSN: 0003-066X http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/amp0000556
983
... Across countries, adolescents consistently rank concerns related to school as among the greatest stressors in their lives (Banks and Smyth 2015;Byrne, Davenport, and Mazanov 2007;García-Moya et al. 2021;Krogh and Madsen 2023;Luthar, Kumar, and Zillmer 2020;Stentiford, Koutsouris, and Allan 2021). Schoolrelated stress is also associated with more mental health problems (Steare et al. 2023) and lower academic achievements (von der Embse et al. 2018). ...
... A second hypothesis, the educational prospects hypothesis, posits that academic success has taken on a greater value in the lives of adolescents, in particular as a means for subsequent success in the labour market, making concerns regarding academic achievements both more widespread and more stressful (i.e., both an exposure and an effect mechanism) (Cosma et al. 2021;Doepke and Zilibotti 2017;Krogh and Madsen 2023;Ramey and Ramey 2009;Thompson 2023). For instance, the emergence of knowledge economies and of the 'schooled society' (Baker 2014) has made education more important for the future prospects of adolescents, while educational expansion and rising educational aspirations have made access to higher education more competitive (Luthar, Kumar, and Zillmer 2020;Stentiford, Koutsouris, and Allan 2021). Tentative support for the educational prospects hypothesis is provided by research showing that students motivated by success and instrumental reasons experience more stress and burnout (Tuominen-Soini, Salmela-Aro, and Niemivirta 2008) and that educational expansion at the national level is associated with more stress (Kim, Kim, and Chung 2020). ...
... Rising academic aspirations also made a significant, albeit more modest, contribution to the increase in stress, in support of the educational prospects hypothesis. This is consistent with American research showing that schools with an overrepresentation of high-achieving students with ambitious educational plans have emerged as a novel risk factor for mental health problems, partly due to the intense competitiveness and strong performance pressures characterising these schools (Luthar, Kumar, and Zillmer 2020;Stentiford, Koutsouris, and Allan 2021). In addition, this finding may be seen in the light of growing scepticism of the virtues of education-based meritocracy in Western societies. ...
Article
Full-text available
Concerns related to school are consistently ranked as among the greatest stressors in the lives of adolescents. Research from varying contexts report rising rates of school‐related stress among students, but we currently lack knowledge on what drives these trends. The aim of this study is to investigate the predictors of temporal trends in school‐related stress in Swedish students between 2003 and 2020. To this end, repeated surveys of 9807 Swedish students aged 16 years are analysed using Blinder‐Oaxaca decomposition techniques. The results show that the rise in school‐related stress was primarily due to growing schoolwork difficulties and social exclusion among students, indicating possibly adverse consequences of a large‐scale educational reform as well as of the COVID‐19 pandemic. In addition, rising academic aspirations contributed to the increase, in line with arguments concerning the increasing weight attached to educational success among adolescents in the ‘schooled society’.
... According to the World Health Organization (2021), approximately 14% of adolescents worldwide face mental health challenges. Moreover, the excessive pressure to excel has been identified as one of the top factors threatening adolescents' well-being (Luthar et al., 2020). An international report by the OECD (2015) also indicates that nearly 60% of students globally experience high levels of anxiety about their schoolwork. ...
... These regions all share a common Confucian cultural heritage that places a high value on education, fostering a strong dedication to academic pursuits (Leung, 2002). Consequently, East Asian students often face intense educational pressures, which are recognized as significant threats to their well-being (Luthar et al., 2020). This situation raises important questions regarding the well-being experiences of East Asian students, particularly the interplay between student well-being and academic achievement. ...
Article
Full-text available
Positive education emphasizes the importance of student well-being as a critical outcome. Well-being is a complex construct involving both hedonic and eudaimonic aspects. However, existing literature predominantly concentrates on hedonic well-being, with less attention given to eudaimonic well-being. Furthermore, how these two aspects of well-being are associated with academic outcomes is underexplored. To address these gaps, this study examines the hedonic and eudaimonic well-being profiles of 41,396 15-year-old students from six high-performing East Asian regions (Mainland China, Macao SAR, Hong Kong SAR, Chinese Taipei, Japan, and Korea) using a person-centered approach (latent profile analysis). Students from the six regions exhibited both commonalities and differences in their well-being profiles. Across the six regions, we identified three standard profiles: flourishing (high well-being), moderate (average levels of well-being), and discouraged (low well-being) profiles. While in mainland China, aside from the three standard profiles, we identified a fourth profile characterized by low hedonic and high eudaimonic well-being (i.e., resilient). Overall, students in the flourishing group demonstrated the best academic outcomes, while those in the discouraged group showed the poorest. An interesting finding was the emergence of the resilient group among mainland Chinese students. This group displayed academic outcomes that were superior to the moderate and discouraged groups, but slightly worse than the flourishing group. The study reveals the importance of adopting an integrative perspective that includes both hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. It offers valuable insights into the intricate associations between different well-being profiles and academic-related outcomes. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
... Research by scholars such as Luthar [41][42][43] and Assari [44] complicates the narrative by suggesting that highly resourced environments-particularly affluent, predominantly White areas-do not always lead to better outcomes for all groups of children. Luthar's work shows that high-pressure, competitive environments in affluent areas can negatively impact both minority and White youth [41][42][43][45][46][47][48][49]. ...
... Research by scholars such as Luthar [41][42][43] and Assari [44] complicates the narrative by suggesting that highly resourced environments-particularly affluent, predominantly White areas-do not always lead to better outcomes for all groups of children. Luthar's work shows that high-pressure, competitive environments in affluent areas can negatively impact both minority and White youth [41][42][43][45][46][47][48][49]. In parallel, Assari's research suggests that in high-opportunity settings, Black students experience heightened levels of discrimination [50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58], which in turn undermines their academic performance [59][60][61]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Objective Inequalities exist in children’s educational outcomes—including reading proficiency, school discrimination, and school disciplinary actions—across zip codes with different levels of educational childhood opportunity index (COI). This study examines the interaction between race and educational environment on children’s educational outcomes. We hypothesize that race, parental education, and their interaction are associated with perceived school discrimination, which in turn reduces their cognitive, academic, and emotional wellbeing. We also hypothesize that Black children with high socioeconomic status (SES) report high perceived school discrimination in high-COI settings. Methods Data were drawn from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study, which measures a wide range of educational, cognitive, and emotional outcomes. At the same time, the ABCD children are sampled across areas with vast differences in COI rankings, that can be classified into these five categories: very high, high, average, low, and very low educational COIs. Our structural equation models (SEM) tested the additive and interactive effects of race and educational attainment on perceived school discrimination, and the effects of school discrimination on various cognitive abilities (reading proficiency, picture vocabulary, and list sorting working memory), school suspension, as well as depressed mood. Our multi-group SEM assessed how these relationships vary across educational COI levels. Results Our findings showed that high SES Black children report highest school discrimination in residential areas with highest COIs. This is based on the observation that the interaction between race and parental education on experiences of school discrimination were only significant in areas with highest COI. Across residential areas with different COI levels, students who experienced higher school discrimination had higher suspension, worse depression, and worse cognitive performance. Conclusion While higher COIs are associated with better academic outcomes, Black-White gaps exist in the role of increased COI through increased racial bias that children perceive. These findings underscore the complexity of educational equity, suggesting that improving COI alone is insufficient for eliminating racial disparities in school experiences. Policies should be in place to reduce school-based discrimination against Black students in high COI settings.
... Additionally, these areas might have a more robust law enforcement presence or community programs aimed at substance use prevention, which could contribute to lower use rates. Moreover, as previous research by Luthar [39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48] has shown, substance use is increasingly prevalent in affluent areas, indicating that environmental influences may differ based on socioeconomic status. Another possibility is that our measures of drug-related crime did not adequately capture the nuances of the environments these adolescents live in, such as informal social controls or protective community factors that mitigate the risk of substance use. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background The initiation of substance use during adolescence is a significant public health concern with long-term implications. Structural and environmental factors, such as community-level crime statistics related to drug offenses, are often assumed to influence the likelihood of substance use among youth. However, the relationship between these environmental crime indicators and early substance use initiation in adolescents is not well understood. Objective This study aims to examine the association between environmental drug-related crime statistics—derived from Uniform Crime Reports, including drug abuse violations, drug sales, marijuana sales, drug possession, and driving under the influence (DUI)—and the use of tobacco, marijuana, and alcohol among adolescents aged 9-16 in the United States. Methods Data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study, which follows a cohort of adolescents from ages 9-10 to 16, were analyzed. 11,878 participants entered our analysis. The primary environmental measures included total drug abuse violations, drug sale offenses, marijuana sale offenses, drug possession offenses, and DUI reports. Substance use outcomes of interest were the frequency and prevalence of tobacco, marijuana, and alcohol use across the observed age range. Results Contrary to expectations, higher levels of drug-related crime in a community were not associated with increased use of tobacco, marijuana, or alcohol among adolescents. In fact, the study found a significant inverse relationship between the total number of drug-related crimes and tobacco use, suggesting lower tobacco use in areas with higher reported drug abuse violations, drug sales, marijuana sales, drug possession, and DUI incidents. No significant associations were observed between these crime indicators and the use of marijuana or alcohol. Conclusions These findings challenge the prevailing assumption that higher environmental drug-related crime statistics necessarily predict greater substance use among adolescents. The observed inverse relationship between drug-related crime and tobacco use warrants further investigation to understand the underlying mechanisms and to inform targeted intervention strategies. Future research should explore the complex interplay between structural environmental factors and youth substance use to better inform public health policies.
... Mental health support, self-esteem building programs, and counseling services that promote positive self-image and emotional resilience could be integral components of preventive interventions targeting adolescents at risk of substance use. Programs that promote self-efficacy and provide adolescents with tools to cope with social pressures and personal challenges may be particularly effective [27]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Substance use among secondary school students is a growing concern with significant implications for public health. This study aimed to identify the risk factors associated with substance use in a community of secondary school students in Aden Governorate, Yemen. A cross-sectional study was conducted among secondary school students in Aden governorate, using a structured questionnaire to collect data on potential risk factors for substance use. The questionnaire included measures of Peer Pressure, Academic Performance (GPA), Parental Monitoring, as well as self-esteem towards drug use. The Self-esteem among secondary students was measured using Rosenberg's Self-Esteem Scale. Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses were performed to identify significant risk factors. A total of 280 male students from 10 secondary schools (both section) of Aden governorate participated in the study, with a mean age of 17.37± 1.42 years. Risk factors associated with substance use included peer pressure (OR=2.34, 95% CI: 1.56-3.42), poor academic performance (OR=1.87, 95% CI: 1.23-2.81), lack of parental supervision (OR=1.62, 95% CI: 1.09-2.37), and low self-esteem (OR=1.45, 95% CI: 1.01-2.11). The findings highlight the complex interplay of social, familial, and individual factors in contributing to substance use among secondary school students. These results can inform targeted interventions and preventive strategies to address the identified risk factors in the community. This study identified several key risk factors for substance use among secondary school students in the community. Understanding and addressing these risk factors is vital for the development of effective preventive interventions and support systems to mitigate the impact of substance use on the health and well-being of young individuals.
Article
Full-text available
Introduction Ethiopian students' academic achievement goes beyond just cognitive ability. It is interwoven with psychological and social factors. This analysis examines how these interconnected dimensions, including behaviour, emotions, and mental well-being, influence academic attainment. By revealing the multifaceted factors that shape student well-being and success, this review highlights their critical role in the higher education landscape. Methods This systematic review and meta-analysis study aimed to contribute to the academic literature by exploring the psychosocial factors affecting the academic achievement of Ethiopian higher education students. It leveraged a diverse array of scholarly databases, and adherence to recommended reporting guidelines ensured methodological rigor and transparency throughout the investigation. Result This systematic review synthesizes findings from 14 high-quality Ethiopian cross-sectional studies assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The overall pooled mean grade point average of respondents was 3.04, [(95 % CI: 2.75, 3.32), I² = 0.00 %, P < 0.001)]. The pooled odds ratio psychosocial predictors of academic achievement was 0.47, [(95 % CI: 0.46, 0.48), I² = 0.00 %, P = 0.001)]. The study explored factors affecting academic achievement, including psychological (sleep, stress, self-esteem) and sociological factors (social media, financial hardship, social support). The review found that these factors emerged as significant influences, highlighting the multifaceted nature of academic success. Conclusion This synthesized study champions a holistic approach to education, urging the integration of academic progress and student well-being. It emphasizes interventions in mental health, social support, and resource access, and acknowledge their multifaceted impact on learning. In addition, it would be better to build inclusive environments with the involvement of educators and policymakers to optimize the academic success of higher education students.
Article
Wanting to matter—to feel socially recognized, appreciated, and capable of actions that benefit others—represents a fundamental motivation in human development. The motivational salience of mattering appears to increase in adolescence. Evidence suggests this is related to pubertal increases in the incentive salience for gaining social value and personal agency. This can provide a useful heuristic for understanding motivational proclivities (i.e. wanting to matter) that influence action-outcome learning as young adolescents are exploring and learning how to navigate increasingly complex social and relational environments. Adolescence also brings new capacities, motives, and opportunities for learning to care about and contribute to the benefit of others. Together, these create a window of opportunity: a sensitive period for learning to gain salient feelings of mattering through caring prosocial actions and valued societal contributions. Successfully discovering ways of mattering by doing things that matter to others may contribute to formative socio-emotional learning about self/other. Advances in understanding these social and relational learning processes and their neurodevelopmental underpinnings can inform strategies to improve developmental trajectories of social competence and wellbeing among adolescents growing up in a rapidly changing and increasingly techno-centric world.
Presentation
Full-text available
From Conference brochure: With a basis in over 30 years of scientific research on resilience, Dr. Luthar will describe the culture-specific risk and protective factors that affect student well-being in high achieving schools. She will discuss critical aspects of students' relationships with parents and with peers, as well as salient aspects of school climate, with an emphasis, throughout, on factors that are amenable to change by stakeholders at schools. Based on cutting-edge data across multiple schools, she will summarize specific directions for educators and parents about how to foster the well-being of “the whole child” in high achievement settings.
Article
Full-text available
Drawing from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH; N = 611,880), a nationally representative survey of U.S. adolescents and adults, we assess age, period, and cohort trends in mood disorders and suicide-related outcomes since the mid-2000s. Rates of major depressive episode in the last year increased 52% 2005-2017 (from 8.7% to 13.2%) among adolescents aged 12 to 17 and 63% 2009-2017 (from 8.1% to 13.2%) among young adults 18-25. Serious psychological distress in the last month and suicide-related outcomes (suicidal ideation, plans, attempts, and deaths by suicide) in the last year also increased among young adults 18-25 from 2008-2017 (with a 71% increase in serious psychological distress), with less consistent and weaker increases among adults ages 26 and over. Hierarchical linear modeling analyses separating the effects of age, period, and birth cohort suggest the trends among adults are primarily due to cohort, with a steady rise in mood disorder and suicide-related outcomes between cohorts born from the early 1980s (Millennials) to the late 1990s (iGen). Cultural trends contributing to an increase in mood disorders and suicidal thoughts and behaviors since the mid-2000s, including the rise of electronic communication and digital media and declines in sleep duration, may have had a larger impact on younger people, creating a cohort effect. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
Article
Full-text available
A theoretical model linking achievement and emotions is proposed. The model posits that individual achievement promotes positive achievement emotions and reduces negative achievement emotions. In contrast, group-level achievement is thought to reduce individuals' positive emotions and increase their negative emotions. The model was tested using one cross-sectional and two longitudinal datasets on 5th to 10th grade students' achievement emotions in mathematics (Studies 1-3: Ns = 1,610, 1,759, and 4,353, respectively). Multilevel latent structural equation modeling confirmed that individual achievement had positive predictive effects on positive emotions (enjoyment, pride) and negative predictive effects on negative emotions (anger, anxiety, shame, and hopelessness), controlling for prior achievement, autoregressive effects, reciprocal effects, gender, and socioeconomic status (SES). Class-level achievement had negative compositional effects on the positive emotions and positive compositional effects on the negative emotions. Additional analyses suggested that self-concept of ability is a possible mediator of these effects. Furthermore, there were positive compositional effects of class-level achievement on individual achievement in Study 2 but not in Study 3, indicating that negative compositional effects on emotion are not reliably counteracted by positive effects on performance. The results were robust across studies, age groups, synchronous versus longitudinal analysis, and latent-manifest versus doubly latent modeling. These findings imply that individual success drives emotional well-being, whereas placing individuals in high-achieving groups can undermine well-being. Thus, the findings challenge policy and practice decisions on achievement-contingent allocation of individuals to groups.
Article
Full-text available
Substantial evidence links socioeconomic status to internalizing and externalizing behavior problems. However, it is unclear how these two categories of behavior problems relate to specific components of socioeconomic status (e.g., income, educational attainment, and occupational prestige) or overall social status. In this study, we conducted a second-order meta-analysis to estimate the average associations of income, education, occupation, and overall socioeconomic status with internalizing and externalizing behavior problems, and to examine if age, sex, and race/ethnicity moderated these associations. Our systematic search in PsycINFO, PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global identified 12 meta-analyses (17% unpublished), including approximately 474 primary studies and 327,617 participants. In relation to internalizing, we found small average associations with income, r+ = –.18, 95% confidence interval (CI) [–.31, –.04], and education, r+ = –.12, 95% CI [–.15, –.09]. In relation to externalizing, we found smaller associations with income, r+ = –.02, 95% CI [–.15, .10], education, r+ = –.03, 95% CI [–.16, .10], and overall socioeconomic status, r+ = –.05, 95% CI [–.11, .01], but these CIs included zero. Only sex composition of the samples moderated the latter association. We provide recommendations for best practices and future research directions.
Article
Full-text available
In an upper-middle class setting, we explored associations between students’ peer reputation in Grades 6 and 7 with adjustment at Grade 12. With a sample of 209 students, a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of peer reputation dimensions supported a 4-factor model (i.e., popular, prosocial, aggressive, isolated). Structural equation models were used to examine prospective links between middle school peer reputation and diverse Grade 12 adjustment indices, including academic achievement (Scholastic Aptitude Test scores and grade point average), internalizing and externalizing symptoms, and use of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. Prosocial reputation was connected to higher academic achievement levels and fewer externalizing symptoms. Both prosocial and isolated reputations were negatively associated with dimensions of substance use, whereas popularity was positively associated. Implications for future research and interventions are discussed.
Article
Full-text available
Growth in economic disparities, economic segregation, and racial/ethnic diversity have occurred in tandem in the U.S., leading to essential questions concerning whether the benefits of economic resources are shared across diverse groups. Analyzing a sample of eighth grade early adolescents (age 14 years) drawn from the nationally representative Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Kindergarten Class of 1998-1999 (N = 7625; 59% White, 12% Black, 19% Hispanic, 7% Asian, 2% Native American, and 2% multiracial; 47% female), lagged regression models assessed links between family, neighborhood, and school income and adolescent emotional and behavioral functioning. The results found that family income was associated with heightened emotional and behavioral functioning, and school income with improved behavioral functioning for White adolescents, whereas no benefits emerged for Black or Hispanic youth. In contrast, mixed associations emerged between income and early adolescent functioning for Asian and American Indian youth, with predominantly negative links appearing for multiracial youth. These patterns highlight diversity in the potential benefits and costs of economic resources, and suggest the need to better specify mechanisms through which economic disparities affect youth from varied backgrounds.
Article
Full-text available
We examined longitudinal associations across an 8-year time span between overcontrolling parenting during toddlerhood, self-regulation during early childhood, and social, emotional, and academic adjustment in preadolescence (N = 422). Overcontrolling parenting, emotion regulation (ER), and inhibitory control (IC) were observed in the laboratory; preadolescent adjustment was teacher-reported and child self-reported. Results from path analysis indicated that overcontrolling parenting at age 2 was associated negatively with ER and IC at age 5, which, in turn, were associated with more child-reported emotional and school problems, fewer teacher-reported social skills, and less teacher-reported academic productivity at age 10. These effects held even when controlling for prior levels of adjustment at age 5, suggesting that ER and IC in early childhood may be associated with increases and decreases in social, emotional, and academic functioning from childhood to preadolescence. Finally, indirect effects from overcontrolling parenting at age 2 to preadolescent outcomes at age 10 were significant, both through IC and ER at age 5. These results support the notion that parenting during toddlerhood is associated with child adjustment into adolescence through its relation with early developing self-regulatory skills.
Article
We examined life-course effects of attending selective schools using a longitudinal study of U.S. high school students begun in 1960 (Ns ranging from 1,952 to 377,015). The effects, measured 11 and 50 years after the initial assessment, differed significantly across the two indicators of school selectivity that were used. School average socioeconomic background was positively related to students’ educational expectations, educational attainment, income, and occupational prestige at the 11-year follow-up (0.15 ≤ β ≤ 0.39; all ps < .001). Conversely, schools’ average achievement at the 11-year follow-up was negatively related to students’ expectations, attainment, income, and occupational prestige (−0.42 ≤ β ≤ −0.05; all ps < .05) when schools’ socioeconomic background was controlled for. All associations were mediated by students’ educational expectations. With the exception of income, these effects were consistent 50 years after high school, pointing to the long reach of beneficial learning resources and negative social comparison processes when attending selective schools.
Chapter
Promoting children’s mental health in education environments has many advantages. In the United States, preschool education and the care of children is not organized or consistent across jurisdictions or income levels. Consequently, the first time society pays attention to the development of children in an organized way is when they enter Kindergarten or grade one. Therefore, the investment in promoting children’s mental health, which is critical to child development and to society, can be universally supported by the educational system. The goal of this chapter is to highlight approaches to strengthening educational systems for the promotion of mental health from implementation and scaling research and systems science perspectives. We introduce theoretical and practical frameworks that incorporate both perspectives and deduce strategies of creating enabling contexts for promoting children’s mental health in educational environments.
Preprint
Mindset theory predicts that children’s IQ and school grades are positively linked to their belief that basic ability is malleable rather than fixed. We test this prediction in three experimental studies (total n = 624 individually-tested 10-12-year-olds). Two studies included active-control conditions to test effects of fixed-ability beliefs independent of motivation. In addition, we tested whether children’s own mindsets relate to real-life IQ, educational attainment in longitudinal analyses of school grades. Praise for intelligence had no significant effect on cognitive performance. Nor were any effects of mindset were found for challenging material. Active-control data showed that occasional apparent effects of praise for hard work on easy outcome measures reflected motivational confounds rather than effects of implicit beliefs about the malleability of intelligence (study 3, active control condition). Children’s own mindsets showed no relationship to IQ, school grades, or change in grades across the school year, with the only significant result being in the reverse direction to prediction (better performance in children holding a fixed mindset). Fixed beliefs about basic ability appear to be unrelated to ability, and we found no support for mindset-effects on cognitive ability, response to challenge, or educational progress.