- A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
- Learn more
Preview content only
Content available from Nature Climate Change
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Articles
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0608-4
1Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands. 2Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research, Yerseke, the Netherlands.
*e-mail: j.r.f.w.leuven@uu.nl
Estuaries are highly dynamic wetland zones at the transition
from the river to the ocean, susceptible to future climate
change and especially to sea-level rise (SLR)1,2. In estuaries
such as the Western Scheldt, Elbe and Yangtze, the channels provide
access to inland harbours3 and the intertidal bars form a valuable
ecological habitat4. The surrounding land is often densely popu-
lated; in fact, 21 of the world’s 30 largest cities are located next to
estuaries5. Potential SLR-induced threats are increased flood risk6,7,
reduced navigability8 and drowning of the intertidal habitat area3,9–
12. Estuary size and shape may affect their future response to SLR13,14,
but SLR-induced changes in morphology have so far received little
attention. Here we study changes in morphology and the resulting
tidal dynamics for estuaries of different sizes worldwide.
Estuarine bars, tidal flats and salt marshes have the potential
to grow with SLR if they import sufficient fluvial or marine sedi-
ment to adapt the morphology to the new boundary conditions15.
Three key boundary conditions for estuary morphology and their
potential to adapt are (1) planform shape, (2) tidal amplitude at the
estuary mouth and (3) sediment supply. Together these parameters
control the overall volume of water (tidal prism) and sediment
moving in and out of the estuary14,16,17, which determine channel
volume and the space available to form intertidal bars18. However,
under SLR, tidal amplitudes at estuary mouths are likely to change
because of shifting amphidromic points19,20. If the distance between
the estuary mouth and amphidromic point increases, the tidal
amplitude increases and vice versa. It remains unknown how the
combined future SLR and changes in tidal amplitude will affect the
tidal propagation and equilibrium morphology of bar-filled estu-
aries worldwide. Their future equilibrium morphology determines
whether present-day fluvial sediment supply could be sufficient for
adaptation of the morphology.
The balance between bed friction and channel-width conver-
gence determines whether the tidal range amplifies (becomes
larger), remains constant (an ‘ideal estuary’) or dampens (becomes
smaller) in the landward direction14,21–24. A future increase in mean
sea level (MSL) reduces bed friction, which means that the tidal
range can become increasingly amplified. The consequence is
flood risk (higher high waters) and reduced navigability (lower low
waters).
Human exploitation has largely affected the natural processes
occurring in deltas and estuaries in the past centuries25. In par-
ticular, dyke construction and land reclamation3 have cut off the
ecologically valuable flanking mudflats and salt marshes from the
channels that supply sand and mud during inundations26,27. These
intertidal areas provide storage space and friction for the tidal
wave21, thereby naturally reducing flood risk. However, the chan-
nels are dredged for harbour accessibility, which reduces friction for
the tidal wave, thereby enhancing flood risk3,10,11. Additionally, dam
construction in rivers has largely reduced fluvial sediment supply to
estuaries28–30. Here we evaluate how flood risk and drowning threats
can be mitigated by managed realignment. Managed realignment31
means removing coastal protection to expose additional, currently
terrestrial, areas to tidal flooding, which widens the estuary.
We calculate the morphological and hydrodynamic response of
36 estuaries worldwide to SLR and assess the potential for increased
space by managed realignment. Estuaries varied from very small
to very large (0.1–1,000 km2), which allowed us to test the effect
of estuary size on SLR-induced threats. The required sediment for
adaptation and flood water levels within the estuary are used as
main indicators for coping with SLR.
Approach and scenarios
The effect of future SLR was studied in three scenarios (Fig. 1).
To do so, a semi-empirical morphological tool32 was coupled with
a one-dimensional (1D)-hydrodynamic model (see Methods) to
estimate the present-day situation and the scenario effect. Here we
briefly summarize the approach.
Depth distribution was estimated based on the estuary plan-
form shape, tidal amplitude at the mouth and river discharge
(Supplementary Fig. 4 and Supplementary Table 2). Average depth
at the landward boundary and seaward boundary were obtained
from hydraulic geometry relations that were developed for rivers
Sea-level-rise-induced threats depend on the size
of tide-influenced estuaries worldwide
Jasper R. F. W. Leuven 1*, Harm Jan Pierik 1, Maarten van der Vegt1, Tjeerd J. Bouma1,2 and
Maarten G. Kleinhans 1
The effects of sea-level rise on the future morphological functioning of estuaries are largely unknown because tidal amplitudes
will change due to combined deepening of the estuary mouth and shifting amphidromic points at sea. Fluvial sediment supply is
also globally decreasing, which hampers infilling necessary to maintain elevation relative to sea level. Here we model 36 estu-
aries worldwide with varying sizes, shapes and hydrodynamic characteristics, and find that small shallow estuaries and large
deep estuaries respond in opposite ways to sea-level rise. Large estuaries are threatened by sediment starvation and therefore
loss of intertidal area, particularly if tidal amplitude decreases at the mouth. In contrast, small estuaries face enhanced flood
risks and are more sensitive to tidal amplification on sea-level-rise-induced deepening. Estuary widening can partly mitigate
adverse effects. In large estuaries, expanded intertidal areas increase tidal prism and available erodible sediment for adapta-
tion, whereas it slightly reduces tidal amplification in small estuaries.
NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE | VOL 9 | DECEMBER 2019 | 986–992 | www.nature.com/natureclimatechange
986
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved