ArticlePDF Available

Abstract

The Service Learning is an articulated, consistent and coordinated teaching-learning methodology. It resorts to unique assumptions, integrates the learning of technical and scientific knowledge with the personal, social and community development. This methodology permits the student to realise interdisciplinary work and produce plasticity on his/her creativity whilst producing cognitive, personal, social, emotional and transcendental knowledge. This process allows for the development of interpersonal, intrapersonal relations, communication, it fosters joint work and networking, leadership, cooperation and negotiation, personal effectiveness, self-knowledge, self-esteem and self-motivation. It also sensitises students to address humanitarian issues and for the everyday life of the community and social responsibility. This study reflects on the importance of teaching-learning methodology based on Service Learning and it discusses the relevance of its inclusion in the academic curriculum. It uses qualitative methods of data collection and analysis, favouring group interviews with content analysis.
JournalofBusinessManagementand
EconomicResearch
2019,3(9):1733DOI:10.29226/TR1001.2019.155
JournalHomepage:https://www.jobmer.org
ServiceLearning:BenefitsofAnotherLearningPedagogy
OrlandoPetizPereira
UniversidadedoMinho/EscoladeEconomiaeGestão/Portugal
Correspondingauthor:orlandop@eeg.uminho.pt
http://orcid.org/0000000346352696
CarlosArriagaCosta
UniversidadedoMinho/EscoladeEconomiaeGestão/Portugal
caac@eeg.uminho.pt
http://orcid.org/0000000267863578
Abstract
TheServiceLearningisanarticulated,consistentandcoordinatedteachinglearningmethodology.It
resortstouniqueassumptions,integratesthelearningoftechnicalandscientificknowledgewiththe
personal,socialandcommunitydevelopment.Thismethodologypermitsthestudenttorealise
interdisciplinaryworkandproduceplasticityonhis/hercreativitywhilstproducingcognitive,
personal,social,emotionalandtranscendentalknowledge.Thisprocessallowsforthedevelopmentof
interpersonal,intrapersonalrelations,communication,itfostersjointworkandnetworking,leadership,
cooperationandnegotiation,personaleffectiveness,selfknowledge,selfesteemandselfmotivation.
Italsosensitisesstudentstoaddresshumanitarianissuesandfortheeverydaylifeofthecommunity
andsocialresponsibility.Thisstudyreflectsontheimportanceofteachinglearningmethodologybased
onServiceLearninganditdiscussestherelevanceofitsinclusionintheacademiccurriculum.Ituses
qualitativemethodsofdatacollectionandanalysis,favouringgroupinterviewswithcontentanalysis.
Keywords:ServiceLearning,University,Methodology,Student’sholisticdevelopment,Alternative
learningpedagogy

JournalofBusinessManagementandEconomicResearch(JOBMER),vol.3,issue.9,pp.1733
18
1. Introduction
TheServiceLearning(SL)isgenericconceptwithmanybrandsandeachregiongivesitanimportance
andaspecificdesignation(Tapia,2013).HencetheexistenceofdifferentnamestosignaltheService
LearningisasdiverseasSolidaritySchools,SchoolsofGoodliving,Learning‐ Service,Learning+
Service,ServiceLearning,ActiveLearningintheCommunitySocialServices;EthicsandCitizenship
Training,MandatorySocialwork;CommunitySocialPractices,SocialEducationalPractices.Celioetal
(2011:168)alsosharethesamefeelingandfeaturenamessuchas:“servicelearning,”“community
service,”“experientiallearning,”“publicservice,”“civicengagement,”and“civicinvolvement”.Itis
anotherpedagogicalmethodologywhichestablishesotherobjectives(BallesterosSola,2017)and
exceedsthespecificityfrontierandspreadstomostofthequestions,asitisthecaseofsoftskillsthat
arecrosscuttingtofunction,timeandsociety.Itfocusesitselfuponsustainabledevelopmentandit
intendstoidentify,understandandsolvesocialdisagreementsthataffectthecommunity.Itisa
dynamicandinteractiveprocessofapplyingscientificknowledgetotheproblemsofthestudentsʹ
developmentandcommunitiesanditrisesasagoodmultiplieroftacitknowledge(Ruttietal,2016).
DespitethesignificantbenefitsderivedfromServiceLearningasalearningteachingmethodologyfor
thedevelopmentofthestudent,theuniversity,thelocalcommunity,theeconomyandsociety,higher
educationinstitutions,especiallyinthesphereoftheEconomicandBusinessSciences,stillrelyhighly
upontraditionallearningteachingmethodologies,whichareverticaltopdownonesandofexpository
andindependentnatureofthecommunity.Theyarealotmorebasedonspecificityratherthangeneral
approachandfocusalotonthespecifictechnicalandinstrumentalskills.However,theyneglectother
keyskillsthatvaluetheknowledgeeconomy,asitisthecaseofemotionalandspiritualskills.Inthis
way,learningpresentweaknessesandflawsinthetrainingofmoreethicalstudentsforbusinessand
everydaylife.Inthissense,intheopinionofMoorerandChristian(2009),businessschoolshavebeen
slowinimplementingalternativepedagogicalpracticesandmoreappropriatetothecommunityand
havefailedtoincludeservicelearningintheircurricula.Thispedagogyisgloballyimportantandit
shouldbedisseminatedandappliedtoallareasofknowledge(MoorerandChristian,2009).Lawler
andJoseph(2009)doalsoconsiderthatservicelearning,whilealearningpedagogy,seemstobevery
suitedtograduateinterdisciplinarycourses,particularlythoseoftheareasofthehumanities.However,
whileapedagogicalinstrumentandinclusion,servicelearningisbeingbroadenedandstudiedina
widerangeofareasofknowledge,suchasEconomics,Management,Business,Finance,Engineering,
Psychology,Mathematics,Accounting,Nursing,Sociology,PoliticalScience,Education,Geography,
JournalofBusinessManagementandEconomicResearch(JOBMER),vol.3,issue.9,pp.1733
19
Communications,ComputerTechnologies,UrbanGeography,Planning,interalia(Ruttietal2016),
whichunderlinesitsimportanceinanyareaofknowledge.
TheServiceLearningoffersinterestingpedagogicalbenefits.Therefore,thisstudyenvisionstoaddress
thefeasibilityandrelevanceofincludingtheSLinthecurriculumoftheUndergraduateDegree
ProgrammeinEconomics.Inthissense,wesoughttodeterminethesensitivityofagroupoffaculty
fromtheUniversityofMinho,intheeconomicarea,abouttherelevanceofadoptingthisteaching
learningmethodology.Weresortedtotheuseofqualitativemethodsofdatacollectionandanalysis,in
particular,groupinterviewswithcontentanalysis.Thegroupinterviewswereconductedusingasemi
structuredinterviewguide.TwoFocusGroupwereconductedandweobservedthehomogeneityof
theparticipantstoensurefairness/equityintheintervention,participationanddiscussion.
2. Servicelearning:Strategiclearningmethodology
Servicelearning,hereinafterreferredtoasSL,isnotanewmethodology(Sedlaketal,2003).Itisa
pedagogicalconciliatorystrategythatnurturescollaboration,mutualrespect,relationsbetweenpeople
andendeavourstoestablishthebridgesbetweentheUniversity,thestudentsandthecommunity
(Petracchietal,2010).Isapedagogicalapproachanditaddresseseducationfromanexperience
perspective.Ithasbeenappliedtovariousdisciplines,coursesandvariouslevelsofeducation,by
severaluniversitiesworldwide(Yorio&Ye,2012).Itallowsforreconcilingschoolpracticeswiththe
communityworkandimprovestheskillsandthecitizensʹ civicresponsibilities(Andrews,2007).It
translatesitselfintheartofteachingtheinteractionbetweentheUniversity,thecommunityandthe
studentanditembodiesdiversebranchesofpersonalandsocialenrichment,namelyundertakingof
civicresponsibility,socialcohesion,communitydevelopmentandthefeelingofhappinessthroughout
thelearningandteachingprocessesandbeinganactivemoleculewithinthecommunity.Itworksthe
humanintelligenceanditmergestherelational,emotional,intellectual,spiritual,interpersonaland
intrapersonalbitsofintelligence.Inthislight,itisapossiblealternativetohumaniseorganisational
institutionsandsocietyingeneral.Thisprocessofhumanisationcanfosterthematerialisationofanew
culturewherecompaniesbecomeclosertocitizensandsociety.Itmayalsostimulatecompaniestobe
moreandmoreinvolvedinsocialprojectsandassumeandimplemententrepreneurshipandtheir
socialresponsibility.
TherearemanydefinitionsofSL,thoughnotalwaysconvergentasregardsresults,objectivesand
importance(Billig,2000).AccordingtoWilliamsandLankford(1999:37)servicelearningisexperiential
educationengagedinbystudents.Theseexperientialactivitiesaddresshumanandcommunityneedsandare
JournalofBusinessManagementandEconomicResearch(JOBMER),vol.3,issue.9,pp.1733
20
accompaniedbystructuredopportunitiesspecificallydesignedtopromotestudentlearninganddevelopment.It
isapowerfulpedagogicaltoolfortheindividualʹspersonalandsocialdevelopmentanditorientsthe
studentstowardtheessenceoftheirrootashumanbeings,causingthemtodiveinapoolofpersonal
valuesandcivicresponsibility(Bringleetal,2016).
Assuch,itisaprocessthatmakesthestudentsmoreactive,positiveandcooperativewithsociety
(Billig,2000).TheSLcanbeassumedasaphilosophyofeducation,asamethodofteachingorasatool
forschoolinclusion.Itsimplementationwillleadtostructuralchangesintheinstitutionsandinthe
relationsofpartnershiptheywillestablishamongsttheproductivemarket,themarketofeducation,
behaviourandinvolvementofstakeholders,includingcivilsocietyingeneral.Itisabeneficiallearning
pedagogy(TigerandParker,2011)anditinvolvesthestudent,theschoolandthecommunityinan
interactivelearningprocess.Thesymbiosisofthoseelementscreatesanatmosphereoftrustamongthe
partiesinvolved.Thisprocessisanopportunityforstudentstoimprovetheireducationadministered
withintheschoolcontext(KenworthyUʹRen&Peterson,2005;Tiger&Parker,2011)becausethe
communityfunctionsasaclassroomwherethecitizensareexcellentmentors.However,theSLisstill
littleusedasalearningstrategyanditisalmostnonexistentinthemanagementandbusinesscourse
units,althoughithasseldombeenusedinhighereducation,inanisolatedandsporadicmanner.
(Gujarathi&McQuade,2002;Desplacesetal,2006;KenworthyU’Ren&Peterson,2005;Elwelland
Bean,2001;WilliamsandLankford,1999).
Althoughitisstillanoveltytomosthighereducationinstitutions,theSLisadidacticandpedagogical
toolavailabletoanyeducationalinstitutionandthereisalreadysomepositiveevidenceofitsresults
(Petkova,2017).Itsformalintroductioninthecurriculumseemstofosterastructuralchangeofthe
programmesanditmightachievetheexpectedresultsforthebettermentofsociety.Thisimpliesa
preliminaryreflectiononthemissionofuniversities,aswellastheservicethatwillbeprovidedtothe
community.However,evidencesuggeststhatthestudentlearnsmoreandbetterwhenhe/sheispart
ofthecocreationofknowledgeporocess(Mpofu,2007),asthisitamalgamatesassumptionsof
cognitive,civic,social,relational,emotional,andspirituallearning.
3. ServicelearningBenefits
AlthoughitisimportanttodelvedeeperinthisareatofurthersupporttherelationshipbetweentheSL
andtheuniversitiesperformance,theavailableliteratureisalreadyrichinthisrelatedarea.(Furcoand
Root,2010).However,theSLisconsideredasapedagogyofsuccessfortheteachingof
entrepreneurship(Calvert,2011)andasthemethodologyofSLcomesinuniversities,thecultureand
JournalofBusinessManagementandEconomicResearch(JOBMER),vol.3,issue.9,pp.1733
21
climateofthesechangenaturally(BringleandHatcher,1995).Itisaneducationalpathwaythathelps
toconsolidatelearningthroughreflectiveselfexamination(Dunlap,2006;Petkus,2000)anditgivesthe
studentautonomyandcontroloverhis/herownlearningprocess.Itdoesalsonurturethefeelingof
competence,selfefficacy,bettersocialrelationsandsoundconnections(Billig,2010)anditgivesthe
studentasenseofwellbeingatwork.Itisalearningmethodologythatinvolvesthestudentandthe
communityinaprocessofmutualinterdisciplinarydevelopmentandfacilitatestheaccessto
knowledge(TigerandParker,2011;KenworthyUʹRen&Peterson,2005;Mpofu,2007;AlRashidand
Walker,2004;Conway,Amel&Gerwien,2009).Itcreatessocialcapital(Laura,2014),fightspoverty
(Ebrahim,2012),commitsstudentswithfairness(Heffernan,2001),promotessocialjustice(Wangand
Rodgers,2006)anditrendersstudentsevermorealtruists(HegartyandAngelidis,2015).
TheapplicationoftheSLbyeducationalinstitutionsisonewaytoachieveafairerandmoresustainable
societybecauseitresortstoateachinglearningprocessfocusinguponjusticeandsocialcommitment
(Gaete,2011).Therefore,GaetebelievesthattheSLisacuttingedgetransformationaltool.Ithaspower
overtheperson,transformshis/herattitudes,actionsandbehavioursanditisanassetatthereachof
humanity.Whenintegratedthematicallyinthecourses,itbecomesaninstrumentofsustainabilityof
societyanditfocusespeopleupontheirconcerns(CheeseandHills,2016;Dmochowskietal,2016).
AccordingtoBringleandHatcher(1995),theSLshouldbeexpandedbytheuniversitiesthroughdirect
developmentofthecurriculum.Theseauthorsbelievethattherearemanywaystoimplementit,in
particularthroughtheirinvolvementinthecommunity,personaladvocacyforanissue,politicalengagement
andactivism,orexperienceinrelatedpedagogies(BringleandHatcher,1995:112).However,theyaddthat
servicelearningcouldintegratesubjectswithmoresensitivityandsusceptibilitytoethicsandtothe
practiceofservice,pointingitasanexampleofsocialwork.ItshouldbenotedthattheSLcannotbe
confinedtoadiscipline,becauseitisacrossalldisciplinesanditisareflective,participatory,
collaborativeandhumanitarianlearning,whichunderlinestheimportanceofethicsintheprocess.
FortheinstitutionalisationofthephilosophyofSL,thedevelopmentofplanningisimportantdueto:
(i)CommonVocabulary,(ii)AcademicIntegrity,(iii)IncreaseSupportandConfidence,(iv)
Institutionalisation(BringleandHatcher,1995:113),furtheringtheneedforthechangeoftheculture
andmissionoftheUniversity,andtheSLshouldbedevelopedwithinthecharacteristicsoftheculture
oftheinstitution(Heffernan,2001).Whichiswhyitshouldbewellplannedandintegratedintothe
coursesbecauseitenhancestheindexesofaltruismandpedagogy(Hoffernan,2001).Italsoimproves
andrenderslifemoreexcitingfortheperformanceofstudentsandoforganisationsandfortaking
responsibilityforahealthycitizenship(Dunlap,2006;Petkus,2000)because,asanexperientiallearning
process,theSLstimulatesactionslikeplanning,design,structure,implementandevaluatecourses
JournalofBusinessManagementandEconomicResearch(JOBMER),vol.3,issue.9,pp.1733
22
(Petkus,2000).TheSLshouldalsobeatoolforpreuniversityteaching,whichwouldmeanarewording
ofthestudyplansandaredefinitionofthemissionofeducationalinstitutions(Appelbaumetal,2017).
Despitetheinitialefforttheadoptionofthismethodologyimplies,itfavoursthesustainabilityof
humanlifethroughthecreationofamoresensitivesocietytothecollectivegoods,whilethemacro
thresholdforeverycitizen.Inthisway,theissuesofsustainabilityshouldbeformallyintegratedinto
theacademiccurriculum,asitmustoccurwithinorganisationsandineverymomentofcitizens’lives
(Dmochowskietal,2016;Rusinko,2010).Althoughitiscomplexandinterdisciplinary,itsintegration
hasclearlydefinedgoals,which,resortingtoLee,(2012)welistbelow:
1. graspandunderstandinterdisciplinarityandtheoreticalknowledgeofadiscipline,
2. understand,applyandadjuststrategiestosolveproblemsbymeansofappropriatemethods
andtechnologies,
3. communicateandworkingroupandinfrontofaudiences,
4. understandprofessionalresponsibilitiestotheethical,legal,andsecuritylevelanddrawa
solution,
5. understandsocialaspectsandgivethemappropriatesolution,
6. raiseawarenessforthecontinuousacquisitionofrelevantknowledge.
Ifonecomparestotraditionaleducation,reflectionsontheSLwithinhighereducation,outshinethat
studentsinvolvedinthissystemaremorepositive,committed,responsibleandsensitivetosocialissues
andconcernedwithotherpeople.Theyalsounveilthatthesestudentstrustmoreinthevaluesand
generalprinciplesgoverninglifeinsociety,whichshowsthattheSLhasastrongimpactonthestudent,
ontheUniversityandonthecommunityatthepersonal,moral,social,relational,cognitiveand
spirituallevel(Markusetal.,1993).Hence,therearemanybenefitswhichinspireustodefendthe
introductionofSLintheacademiccurriculum,amongwhich,andaccordingtoGarcíaGarcíaand
CotrinaGarcía(2015:18),wecanlist:
a) itallowsstudentstolinkthemselveswithfuturelabourperformancecontexts;
b) itraisestheirpedagogicalawareness;
c) itfavoursthedevelopmentofamorerealisticperceptionoftheteachingprofession;
d) itbuildstheirconfidencewhenpeformingtheirprofession;
e) itpromotestheeducationaldialoguewithteachers,etcetera.
JournalofBusinessManagementandEconomicResearch(JOBMER),vol.3,issue.9,pp.1733
23
AccordingtoNewmanandHernandez(2011)andHernandezandNewman(2006),theeducational
institutionsthatimplementanSLprogrammedemonstrategoodperformance.Theseauthorshave
deliveredthecourse“MindingourBusiness”(MOB),in1997,andtheyweresupportedbytheCollege
ofBusinessAdministration.Theyconcludedthatstudentswhoattendedthecoursedemonstratedan
outstandingperformance,namelyindecreasingabsenteeism,increasedinterestinbelongingtotheir
institution,unveiledahighdrivetostarttheirownbusiness,theywereeagertoacquiremoreskillsfor
theirpersonaldevelopmentandbuildtheirselfesteem,amongothers.Theyalsoconsiderthatstudents
havedevelopedtheircommunicationskills,interpersonaldevelopment,teamwork,leadership,open
mindednessforthinkingandproblemsolvingskills,concludingthattheMOBisanexcellentSL
programme.Inthissense,theyindicatethatthemainobjectivesoftheMindingourBusinessLearning
aresummarisedintable1:
Table1.MindingOurBusinessLearningGoals
Thehighestthinkinglevelitrequiresorwhetheritreferstoaffective/moralorskilldevelopmentfollows
eachlearninggoal.
1.Developastrongsenseofsocialresponsibilityfortheyouthofthepartnermiddleschool.
AFFECTIVE/MORAL
2.Understandthebasicprinciplesassociatedwiththeoperationofaneffectiveteam.
COMPREHENSION
3.Becomeamoreeffectiveteamplayer.SKILLDEVELOPMENT
4.Developmentoringandteamfacilitationskills.SKILLDEVELOPMENT
5.Improveleadershipandcommunicationskills.SKILLDEVELOPMENT
6.Developsensitivityandrespectforsocialclass,ethnicandracialdiversity.AFFECTIVE/MORAL
7.Understandsomeofthemainissuesandconcernsofpreadolescentdevelopment.
COMPREHENSION
8.Applythebasicconceptsofentrepreneurshiptoastudentrunbusiness.APPLICATION
9.Facilitatetheprocessofstartingandrunningabusiness.APPLICATION
10.Setupaprojectedincomestatementforasmallbusiness.APPLICATION
Source:NewmanandHernandez(2011:41)
NewmanandHernandez(2011)andHernandezandNewman(2006),summariseevidence
demonstratingthattheresultsofthecoursesbasedonSLarenotallthesameandthattheydependon
somevariables,amongwhichweunderlinethecultureofSLanditsalignmentwiththemissionofthe
institution.Hence,themissionoftheinstitutionfeedsthecultureofauniversitybasedonSL.
DespitetheimportanceofNewmanandHernandez(2011)andHernandezandNewman(2006)
research,theSLshouldnotbeconfinedtoacoursebutapartoftheacademiccurriculumbecausethe
SLisacrossallareasandallcourses.However,thecoursesrelatedtothesocialarea(caseofsocialwork
JournalofBusinessManagementandEconomicResearch(JOBMER),vol.3,issue.9,pp.1733
24
andsocialeconomy)seemtobemoresensitivetoSLthanothercourses.Nevertheless,regardlessofthe
areaandcourse,accordingtoConway,Amel&Gerwien(2009),theoutcomesoftheSLcanbegrouped
infourblocks:academicoutcomes,personaloutcomes,socialoutcomesandcitizenshipoutcomes:
academicoutcomes:enshrinesacademicandcognitivechanges,theabilitytoapplyknowledge,skillsand
learningtomotivateandfostertheindividualaccountability.
1. Personaloutcomes:underlinestheinterpersonalskills,valuesandpersonalbeliefs.Italso
outshinesbehavioursandattitudesthatwillimprovethewellbeingoftheindividual,
2. Socialoutcomes:emphasisestheinterpersonal,groupandsocialskills.Itfocusesuponthe
interactionwithothers,respectforothers,respectforthecommunity,empathy,thoughtsand
beliefsabouttheotherarepartofthisblockofresults,
3. Citizenshipoutcomes:focusesondemocraticparticipation,awarenessandsocialresponsibility,
personalparticipation,justice,ethicsandcivicmovements.Thoseareresultstobeembodied
intheprocessservicelearning.
Inthismanner,thereareendlessbenefitsofSL,whoseresultsarehardlyvisibleormeasurable.Overall,
itsbenefitsandchallengesforthestakeholderareidentifiedbyBallesterosSola(2017:2021)intable2.
Table2.Summaryofbenefitsandchallengesbystakeholders
BenefitsChallenges
Students
Experientialhandsonlearning
Connectiontocommunity
Senseofpurpose
Tangibleexperience“sellable”
forinternships&jobs!
Timconsuminghardforstudentsjugglingmany
demands
ManagingexpectationsnotacourseforaneasyA
Apathyandlackofcontinuity
Shorttermsmindset“Willthisgetmeajob?”
Inexperiencenotallstudentscanrisetheoccasion
Uncertainty“spoonfeeding”temptation
Feelingsoffrustrationwhensocialbusinessdoesn’t
materialize
Community
Partners
Free“consulting”/accessto
businessskills
LearningaboutYSBandearned
incomestrategies
Closertiestotheuniversity
Networkingopportunities
PositivePR
Timeconsuming:“Iamrunninganonprofitorsocial
business,notimeforthis”
Managingexpectations:“Canundergradsreally
deliver”?
Lackofprojectcontinuity:“Whathappenswhen
semesterisover?”
“Wearen’tabusiness,wecan’tunderstandthelingo”
JournalofBusinessManagementandEconomicResearch(JOBMER),vol.3,issue.9,pp.1733
25
Professor
Engaged&motivatedstudents
Tangibleresults
PositivePR
“Meaningful”teaching
Researchopportunities
Timeconsuming
Managingexpectations/“highperformance”pressure
Lackofprojectcontinuity
Lackofcontroloverunforeseenfactors
Institutionalsupport/recognition(doesitreallycount
fortenure?)
Communicationandcoordinationchallengestoomany
stakeholders
SCORE
Counselors
Advisingwithapurpose
Workingwithstudents
Newconnections&networking
opportunities
Exposuretoanewwaytothink
aboutbusiness
Timeconsuming
UnderstandingYunusSocialBusinessandtheideaof
mergingpurposeandprofit
Workingwithunmotivatedstudents
Source:AdaptedbyBallesterosSola(2017:2021)
4. Methodology
Theempiricalstudyusesqualitativemethodsofdatacollectionandanalysis,inparticular,group
interviewswithcontentanalysis.Thegroupinterviewswereconductedusingasemistructured
interviewscript.WeconductedtwoFocusGroupcomposedofsixelementsinthefirstandfiveinthe
second,andwithfacultyoftheDepartmentofEconomics,SchoolofEconomicsandManagement,
UniversityofMinho.Thestudyconsideredthesocialrepresentationofparticipants,seekingto
articulatetheobjectivewiththesubjectiveofthediscussion,inaccordancewiththerecommendations
ofWar(2006).Theindepthinterviewincludingtheʺfocusgroupʺ,allowstocollectdataenrichedby
theexperienceoftheparticipants(Patton,2002)andrealiseastructureddiscussionwithasmallgroup
ofparticipants,moderatedbyoneormorefacilitators(PrinceandDavies,2001;MarczakandSewell,
2007citedbyMasadeh,2012.Thebiggestadvantageofthistechniqueliesinthecharacteristicsof
inquiryanddiscussionthroughquestionsfullyopenwithapotentialofpossibilitiesthatother
techniquesdonotallowto,namelybymeansofinquirieswherethequestionsshouldbe,bynature,
closed.Thegroupsinfocusgroupformatsshouldensuresomehomogeneitywithregardtotheirprofile
(Dreachslin,1999)inordertobemoreequaltothecontributionoftheparticipantsinthediscussionof
thetopicsunderdiscussion(Gibbs,1997;Boddy,2005).
Thegroupdiscussionpermitsaccesstotheperceptions,themeaningsandtheassignmentsthatthe
facultymemberswhoparticipatedinthisresearchbuildontheirunderstandingoftheteachingof
economicsandhowtheyperceivehumanisation.Theinterveningprofessorsʹ linesofinvestigation
includeEnvironmentalEconomics,DevelopmentEconomics,SocialEconomics,Economicsof
JournalofBusinessManagementandEconomicResearch(JOBMER),vol.3,issue.9,pp.1733
26
Education,LabourEconomics,RegulationEconomics,EconometricsandFinancialEconomics.Thesize
ofthegroupsconsideredtheguidelinesrecommendedbyresearchersusingthismethodology.
AccordingtoMasadeh(2012),researchersindicateanumberofparticipantsthatwillvarybetween4
and12.However,LeitãoandVergueiro(2000)MarczakandSewell(2007),citedbyMasadeh,2012,
indicate7participantsandGreenbaum(2003)between8to10participants.
Oncewecompletedthetranscriptionofeachinterview,thesewerecarefullyread,lookingforthecore
contentsofeachinterviewandunderliningtherespondentsʹresponsesandideasaboutsuchcontents.
Inthisstage,wefollowedtherecommendationsmaterialisedbyBardin(1977),wherebythefirstlevel
oftheresearchbasedonsemistructuredinterviewsconsistsofwhattheauthormeansbystructural
decodingcentredineachinterview.Thedrawingwasmadeofthevariouscontentsoftheinterview,
therebyattemptingtorankthemaswellthelinkstheymighthavewithothercontents.
Finally,wehavedrawnthesynopsisoftheinterviewsbymeansofthecontentassessmentgrids.
5. ContentAnalysisofthegroupinterviews
ThescopeofthisinvestigationistheperceptionoftheFacultyofEconomicsabouttheintroductionof
theServiceLearningintheteachinglearningprocessintheUndergraduateDegreeProgrammein
Economicsasasupplementaryteachingtool.
InthetwoFocusgroupsconducted,teachersstressedthatthefocusofteachinglearninginthedegree
inEconomicsshouldbebuilt,almostexclusively,onthebasisoffoundationalmodelsandquantitative
methods.WhichexplainswhytheyperceivedmanydifficultiestousetheSLmodelatthelevelofthe
firstcyclestudies.ThisstrictattituderaisesobstaclestoapossibleimplementationoftheSL
methodology.However,teachersadmittedthepossibilityofintroducingsocialcontent,afterteaching
thedisciplinesthattheyregardasfundamentaltothestudent(mainstream).Theyclaimtheysawthe
possibilityofmakingbranchesindisciplinesbelongingtotheterminalphaseofthedegreecoursefor
theimplementationofthesocialdimensionandstressed:ʺtherearethingsthatarestructuralwhichcan
inspirestudentstododifferentthings;theyarenotexceptionsintheeconomicsciencerelatedfield,but
ratherbranchesʺandtheyaddedʺwecannotadjustpermanentlytheteachingtorealityʺbecauseʺthere
isasetthatisstructuralandthateveryoneneedstoknow,whichisthecoreofthecourseandthatis
independentofwhatishappeningoutthereinthesocietyʺ.Inthisway,participantsassumedtheneed
fordisseminatingknowledgeasamethodoflearningtobefollowed.Despitethisrationale,teachers
alsorecognisedtheimportanceofeconomicsustainabilityandthetradeoffbetweenefficiencyand
JournalofBusinessManagementandEconomicResearch(JOBMER),vol.3,issue.9,pp.1733
27
equity,recognisingthattheycouldeventuallyconsidertheteachingandlearningofthesocialsphere.
Theyaddthat,inthefuture,sucharealitycouldleadtotheimplementationofServiceLearning.
However,theteachersreaffirmedthatitseventualimplementationcouldonlyoccurinthelastyearof
thedegreeor2ndcycleofstudies(MasterʹsDegree).Hence,itsintroductioninthecurriculumwould
needabasisofdialoguebetweentheprogrammesoftheUndergraduateandMastersCourses,stating:
ʺitisnecessarytodrawacommonbasisfordialogueandthereafterdesignthebranchesordeconstructʺ.
Teachersfinditdifficulttodrawitasthecontentofa1stcycleCourseUnitduetothecurrentcurricula
structureandthecourseunitscurrentsyllabustheyhavetodeliverintheclassroom:ʺitʹstoohardto
fulfilthecourseunitsʹ contentsletaloneintroduceasevaluationobjectdimensionsarenotinthe
syllabus/contentʺ.Giventheaforementionedconstraints(reservations),itseemsmorefavourabletoits
implementationatthelevelofthe2ndcyclecourses,stating:ʺIdonotknowiftheseissuesshouldnot
reflectonaframeworkofcoursesaftergraduation;eventually,itmightmakemoresenseinan
evaluativeforminthe2ndcycleʺ.Teachersconsiderthateventuallytheycouldintroducesomeofthe
socialissuesinoptionalcourseunitsofʺsocialeconomicsʺ andʺenvironmentaleconomicsʺ,which
gravitatearoundproblemsyettobesolved.However,theyreaffirm:ʺitsoundsinteresting...butIfail
toseehowtofititinthecurriculumʺ.
Whentalkingabouthowtodrawthestudentsofthedegreeineconomicsʹattentiontosocialissues,it
wasaddressedtheimportanceofaninclusiveschoolasopposedtothecurrentdominantmodel.
Nevertheless,teachersexpresstheirconcernwithsocialissues,givingpreferencetothetrainingofthe
studentstoenterthehighlycompetitivemarket.Inthissense,itwassuggestedthattheissuesof
inclusion,citizenshipandsocialcommitmentshouldbeintroducedintheteachinglearningprocess,in
apragmaticmanner,punctuallyandvoluntarily.
TeachershaveexpressedapprehensionandunawarenessaboutthemethodologyoftheSLbystating:
ʺtheawarenessthatthereisaworldoutthere,withwhichwehavetoworryabout,canbedoneinthe
samemannerasundergoneintheenvironmentalandsocialeconomicsʺ.Inviewofthelackof
knowledgeaboutthemethodologyintheanalysis(ServiceLearning),therewasaconfusionwith
volunteeringpractices,orservicespracticesalreadyinsertedintheUniversityextensionorpedagogical
practicesoflearningintheworkingcontext(stages).Thereappearedexpressionssuchas:ʺthestudent
willbepartofsociety,toanyorganisationoftherealworldandhe/shehastoidentifyproblemsʺ.They
havealsostatedthatthesepracticeswouldbeidenticaltovolunteeringcontexts.Assuch,they
consideredthatthemethodologyofSLcouldnotbeusedinthecourseunitsbecausetheseareevaluated
andmandatoryasopposedtotheSLwhichwouldbe,intheirunderstanding,volunteering,adding:
ʺonecannotbeforcedtovolunteer,whetherwelikeitornot.Itmightbeabitperversethestudentgoes
JournalofBusinessManagementandEconomicResearch(JOBMER),vol.3,issue.9,pp.1733
28
volunteeringtoearnpointswithintheformatofhis/hercurriculumʺ.However,thefacilitatorstressed
thatvolunteeringisdifferentfromcommunityserviceandservicelearning.Thisrationaleraisedthe
questionofthesocialawarenessofstudents,whichisconsideredakeysteptounderstandthe
communitywherestudentslive.Whilststressingagainthedisciplinesofsocialeconomicsand
environmentaleconomics,oneoftheparticipants,whoprofiledtheagreementofothers,said:ʺprobably
itincreasesmoreawarenessanditmightextenditselfmoretoseveralcourseunitsanditseemstobea
competencetodevelop.Anotherthingistoapproachsocietybyfollowingtheemployersʹsuggestions,
thatis,itistheUniversitythatshouldperformthisjob.Inthismanner,itsimplementationshouldbe
indicatedexplicitlyinthecurriculum.However,theprofessorthinksthatthefunctionoftheUniversity
educationisnottoteachsomeonetoworkʺ.
AnotherdimensionraisedabouttheintroductionofServiceLearningwasitsinclusioninthefieldof
softskills,whichisaprogrammethatalreadyexistsintheSchoolofEconomicsandManagement.This
rationalewasnotdefendedbecausethoseskillsarenotmandatoryforthecompletionofna
UndergarduateDegreeinEconomics.Thus,itwassuggestedthepossibilityofitsinclusionin
Universityextensionprojectsbyinvokingthatitwouldalsobeagoodlinktothecommunityanda
solutionthatwouldinvolvethecreationofanadditionalandobligatorycurriculumunit.However,
anotherparticipantsaidthatthecurrentUniversityextensionisjustaprovisionofservicesbyteachers.
Inthismanner,consideringtheServiceLearningwithintheUniversityextensioncouldonlymakesense
ifofferedinacompletelydifferentformat.
Accordingtotheteachers,anotherobstacletotheimplementationoftheSLliesinthefragilestudents
ʹdriveforsocialactivitiesthatdonotinvolveaclassificationandclaimed:ʺtheywillprobablystriveto
getagoodgradeonthiscourseunitonly,endingtheirinteresthereforthisdisciplineʺ.Anotherteacher,
puttinghimselfintheroleofthestudent,invokedʺIgottiredofworking,Ihavedevotedmytime,and
theotherwhoperformedlesswillhaveasimilarclassificationʺ.Theyhavealsoobservedthatthe
studentcommunitysphereislimitedtotheUniversitycampus,theiraccommodationandleisure
environmentslocatedaroundthecampus,seemtorenderthemunawareofthepulseofthecity.
Theseareaspectsthatrequestfurtherindepthdiscussionbecauseitisacrosscutassumptionofthe
collectiveandindividualsocialresponsibilityandaccountability.Intheabsenceofthis
(co)responsibility,theimplementationofsocialpracticesandthecommunityaidwillstrugglewith
structuralproblems,whichwillpreventitsnaturaldevelopment.
JournalofBusinessManagementandEconomicResearch(JOBMER),vol.3,issue.9,pp.1733
29
6. DiscussionandFinalRemarks
Wethinkthat,duetothegeneralunawarenessoftheteachinglearningmethodologyofSLlearning,
teachershaveexpressedmanyreservationsaboutthismethodology,consideringtheoddsandperhaps
thedifficultytoapplyit.Theyhaveeventakenitasvolunteeringpracticesproxyandotherpedagogical
practicessuchasplacementsandappliedexistingprojectsinsomedisciplines.Theyhavestatedthat
onecannotbeconstantlyadaptingthecurriculumtopresentreality.Inthislight,andconsideringthat
theSLisamethodologydevisedtoestablishabridgebetweenthestudentandthecommunity,and
consideringthegapbetweenthestudentsandthisreality,wouldnotitbeappropriateandurgentthe
introductionofSLindifferentcourses?
DespitetheirlackofknowledgeaboutthemethodologyofSL,teachersdemonstrate,however,a
positivepositioninginrelationtoactivitiesofsocialnature.Nonetheless,theaspectwhichseemsto
hinderbackitsimplementationstillaretheextensivesyllabusdesignedfortheUndergraduateDegree
ProgrammeinEconomics.Teachersdefendtheintroductionofthismethodologyinsomeofthecourse
units,inapragmaticmanner.
RegardingthedifficultiesofimplementingtheServiceLearning,weunderstandthat:
1. Firstly,itseemsnecessarytodelivertrainingactionsforteachersandinparalleltothestudent
community.ThesetrainingsessionsshouldexplainthemethodologyofSLandhighlightits
objectivesandbenefits.Theyshouldalsostresstherequirementsofthemethod,namelyinterms
ofcommitment,responsibility/accountabilityandcooperation.
2. TheSLisaninterdisciplinarylearningteachingmethodology.Assuch,webelieveitis
importanttounderlinethatthesuccessofitsimplementationdrawsonthechangingofeach
courseunitisolatedperspective,wherethecourseunitdoesneedtobeautonomousandto
contributeforthepersonaldevelopmentofthestudentinanintegratedmanner.
3. TheSLisacollaborativeandinteractivelearningmethodologybetweentheUniversity,the
studentandthecommunitywithinitsvarioussocialinstitutions.Hence,itseemsrelevantto
accentuatethesocialconceptwithinthemethodologyofSL.
4. Itwouldbenecessarytoclarifythestereotypedconceptsofʺvolunteeringʺ,ʺsocialʺ,
ʺresponsibility/accountabilityʺ,ʺcooperationʺandʺcommitmentʺ.Indeed,thesocialdimension
isnotsynonymoustocharitable,ofkindnessinterestedorotherformsofindividualobjectives.
5. ItseemsimportanttofightbacktheideathatSLisnotavolunteeringpracticenortheapplication
ofcourseunits,suchasinternshipsandvisitstocompanies.Onecannotconfusethis
methodologywithgraduationprojects.TheSLfocusesupontheholisticdevelopmentofthe
JournalofBusinessManagementandEconomicResearch(JOBMER),vol.3,issue.9,pp.1733
30
studentandthecommunityanddeviatesitselffromthemethodologiesthatfocusprimarilyon
technicalandinstrumentalskills.
6. TheSLisalearningteachingmethodologyofmutualcoresponsibility.Itallowsthestudentto
addressrealsocialproblems,tofeelandtacklethemthewayinwhichhe/shehandlesrealissues.
Incontemplatingsuchsituations,thestudentisawareofasocialrealitythattheUniversityand
relatedactivitieswithintheframeworkofdifferentdisciplinesconceal.Inthissense,the
researchersconsiderthattheSLisahumanisingLearningteachingmethodology,whichis
consistentwiththeavailableliterature.
TheUniversitydoesplayastrategicroleintheeconomicandsocialdevelopment.Itmaybethepivot
inconnectinginstitutionsandthecommunity.TheSLisacrucialinstrumentfortheachievementof
thosegoals.Itisapedagogyofglobalvalueandshouldbedisseminatedandappliedtoallareasof
knowledge.WiththeSL,knowledgediffusesandexcellsitselfininterpersonalrelationships,
continuousanddynamicamongalltheparticipatingelementsoftheteachinglearningprocessandthe
community.
7. References
AlRashid,F.andWalker,K.(2004).ServiceLearningThroughtheHighSchoolPyramidModel:ACase
Study.SchoolK12.Paper1.Availableathttps://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/slcek12/1/,
consultedin19022018.
Andrews,C.P.(2007).ServiceLearning:ApplicationsandResearchinBusiness,JournalofEducationfor
Business,83(1):1926.
Appelbaum,S.H.,Calla,R,Desautels,D.andHasan,L.(2017).Thechallengesoforganizationalagility
(part1).IndustrialandComercialTraining,49(1):614.
BallesterosSola,M.(2017).ServiceLeaning:akeypedagogicaltoolforgainingadeeperunderstanding
ofYunusSocialBusiness.InternationalJournalofSocialBusiness,pp.1224.Availableat
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319469739,consultedin04092017.
Bardin,L.(1977).AnálisedeConteúdo.Edições70.Lisboa.
Billig,S.(2000).ResearchonK12SchoolBasedServiceLearning:TheEvidenceBuilds.SchoolK12.
Paper3.Availableathttp://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/slcek12/3,consultedin26012018.
Billig,S.(2010).WhyServiceLearningisSuchaGoodIdea.Colleagues,5(1),Article6.Availableat:
http://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/colleagues/vol5/iss1/6,consultedin26012018.
Boddy,C.(2005).ARosebyanyothernamemaysmellassweetbut“groupdiscussion”isnotanother
namefor“focusgroup”norshouditbe.QualitativeMarketResearch:anInternationalJournal,vol.
8(3),248255.
Bringle,R.,&Hatcher,J.(1995).Aservicelearningcurriculumforfaculty.MichiganJournalofCommunity
ServiceLearning,2(3):112–122.
JournalofBusinessManagementandEconomicResearch(JOBMER),vol.3,issue.9,pp.1733
31
Bringle,R.,Ruiz,A.I.,Brown,M.A.,&Reeb,R.N.(2016).EnhancingthePsychologyCurriculum
throughServiceLearning.PsychologyLearning&Teaching,15(3):294309.
Calvert,V.(2011).ServiceLearningtoSocialEntrepreneurship:AContinuumofActionLearning.
JournalofHigherEducationTheoryandPractice.11(2):118129.
Celio,C.I.,Durlak,J.,Dymnicki,A.(2011).AMetaanalysisoftheImpactofServiceLearningon
Students.JournalofExperientialEducation,34(2),164181.
Chesse,P.andHills,J.(2016).Understandingthehumanatworkhowneurosciencesareinfluencing
HRpractices,StrategicHRReview,15(4):150156.
Conway,J.M.,Amel,E.L.,&Gerwien,D.P.(2009).Teachingandlearninginthesocialcontext:Ameta
analysisofservicelearningʹseffectsonacademic,personal,social,andcitizenshipoutcomes.
TeachingofPsychology,36(4),233245.
Desplaces,D.E.,Steinberg,M.,Coleman,S,andKenworthyU’Ren,A.(2006).AHumanCapitalModel:
ServiceLearningintheMicroBusinessIncubatorProgram.MichiganJournalofCommunityService
Learning,Fall:6680.
Dmochowski.J.E.,Garofalo,D.,Fisher,S,Greene,A.andGambogi,D.(2016).Integratingsustainability
acrosstheuniversitycurriculum,InternationalJournalofSustainabilityinHigherEducation,17(5):
652670.
Dreachslim,J.L.(1999).FocusGroupsasaQualityImprovementTechnique:acaseexamplefrom
HealthAdministrationEducation.QualityAssuranceinEducation,Vol.7(4),224233.
Dunlap,J.C.(2006).UsingGuidedReflectiveJournalingActivitiestoCaptureStudents’Changing
Perceptions.TechTrends,50(6):2026.
Ebrahim,E.(2012).Enactingourfield.NonprofitManagement&Leadership,23(1):1328.
Elwell,M.D.,&Bean,M.S.(2001).Editorsʹ choice:Theefficacyofservicelearningforcommunity
collegeESLstudents.CommunityCollegeReview,28(4),4761.
Furco,A.andRoot,S.(2010).ResearchDemonstratestheValueofServiceLearning.Kappan,91(5):16
21.
Gaete,R.(2011).Laresponsabilidadsocialuniversitariacomodesafíoparalagestiónestratégicadela
EducaciónSuperior:elcasodeEspaña.RevistadeEducación,355,mayoagosto,109133.
GarcíaGarcía,M.andCotrinaGarcía,M.(2015).Elaprendizajeyservicioenlaformacióninicialdel
profesorado:delasprácticaseducativascríticasalainstitucionalizacióncurricular.Profesorado
Revistadecurrículumyfornacióndelprofesorado,19(1):825.
GibbsA.(1997).FocusGroup.Availableat:http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU19.html,consultedin
December2018.
GreenbaumT.(2003).TheGoldStandard?WhytheFocusGroupDeservestobetheMostRespectedof
allQualitativeResearcTools?Availableat:
http://www.quirks.com/articles/article.asp?arg_ArticleId=1125,consultedinDecember2018.
Guerra,I.(2006).PesquisaQualitativaeAnálisedeConteúdoSentidoseFormasdeUso.Princípia,Cascais.
Gujarathi,M.R.,&McQuade,R.J.(2002).ServiceLearninginBusinessSchools:ACaseStudyinan
IntermediateAccountingCourse.JournalofEducationforBusiness,77(3):144150.
Heffernan,K.(2001).ServiceLearninginHigherEducation.JournalofContemporaryWaterResearchand
Education,119(1),28.
Hegarty,N.andAngelidis,J.(2015).TheImpactofAcademicServiceLearningasaTeachingMethod
anditsEffectonEmotionalIntelligence.JournalofAcademicEthics,13(4):363–374.
Hernandez,S.A.andNewman,C.M.(2006).MindingOurBusiness:AModelofServiceLearningin
EntrepreneurshipEducation.JournalofEntrepreneurshipEducation,9:5375.
KenworthyU’Ren,A.,&Peterson,T.(2005).Servicelearningandmanagementeducation:Introducing
the“WECARE”approach.AcademyofManagementLearning&Education,4(3),272277.
Laura,C.(2014).Aprendizajeservicioyeducacuiónsuperior.Unarúbricaparaevaluarlacalidadde
projectos.TesisDoutoral.Barcelona,UniversitatdeBarcelona.
JournalofBusinessManagementandEconomicResearch(JOBMER),vol.3,issue.9,pp.1733
32
Lawler,J.P.&Joseph,A.(2009).ExploringFlexibleModelsofServiceLearninginInformationSystems
Curricula.InformationSystemsEducationJournal,7(95):124.
Lee,R.L.(2012).ExperienceisaGoodTeacher:IntegratingServiceandLearninginInformation
SystemsEducation,JournalofInformationSystemsEducation,Vol.23(2),165176.
Leitão,B.J.andVagueiro,W.(2000).UsingtheFocusGroupapproachforevaluation
customers´opinions:TheexperienceofaBrazilianAcademicLibrary.ThenewLibraryWorld,vol.
101(2),6065.
Masadeh,M.A.(2012).Focusgroup:ReviewsandPractices.InternationalJournalofAppliedScienceand
Technology,Vol.2(10),6368.
Marckaak,MandSewellM.(20017).UsingFocusGroupforEvaluation.Availableat
http://ag.arizona.edu/fcs/cyfernet/cyfar/focus.htm,consultedin08062018.
Markus,G.B.,Howard,J.P.F.,&King,D.C.(1993).Integratingcommunityserviceandclassroom
instructionenhanceslearning:Resultsfromanexperiment.EducationalEvaluationandPolicy
Analysis,15(4):410419.
Moorer,C.andChristian,T.(2009).ServiceLearningandBusinessEducation:DistinctionsBetween
UndergraduateandGraduateBusinessStudents.AmericanJournalofBusinessEducation,2(3):63
72.
Mpofu,E.(2007).ServiceLearningEffectsontheAcademicLearningofRehabilitationServices
Students.MichiganJournalofCommunityServiceLearning,Fall2007:4652.
Newman,C.M.andHernandez,S.A.(2011).MindingourBusiness:LongitudinaleffectsofaService
LearningexperienceonAlumni.JournalofCollegeTeacher&Learning,8(8):3948.
PattonM(2002).QualitativeResearchandevaluationmethods.NewburyPark,CA:
SagePublications.
Petkova,O.(2017).TowardsImprovedStudentExperiencesinServiceLearninginInformationSystems
Courses.InformationSystemsEducationJournal(ISEDJ),15(1):8693.
Petkus,Ed,Jr.(2000).ATheoreticalandPracticalFrameworkforServiceLearninginMarketing:Kolb’s
ExperientialLearningCycle.JournalofMarketingEducation,22(1):6470.
Petracchi,H.;Weaver,A.;Engel,R.,Kolivoski,K&Das,R.(2010).AnAssessmentofServiceLearning
inaUniversityLivingLearningCommunity:ImplicationsforCommunityEngagement.Journal
ofCommunityPractice,18(23):252266.
PrinceM.andDaviesM.(2001).Moderationteams:anextensiontoFocusgroupsmethodology.
QualitativeMarketResearch:anInternationalJournal,vol.(4(4),2017216.
Rusinko,C.A.(2010).Integratingsustainabilityinhighereducation:agenericmatrix:International
JournalofSustainabilityinHigherEducation,11(3):250259.
Rutti,R.M.,LaBonte,J.,Helms,M.M.,Hervani,A.A.,Sarkarat,S.,(2016).Theservicelearningprojects:
stakeholderbenefitsandpotentialclasstopics.Education+Training,58(4):422438.
Sedlak,C.;Doheny,M.;Panthofer,N.andAnaya,E.(2003).CriticalThinkinginStudents’Service
LearningExperiences.CollegeTeaching,51(3):99104.
Tapia,N.(2013).Presentación,16ºSeminarioInternacionaldeaprendizajeyserviciosolidario.CLAYSS,
BuenosAires,22deagostode2013.Availableat
http://www.clayss.org.ar/XVI_seminario/material_22/1_AperturaNT.pdf,consultedin1902
2018.
Tiger,A.andParker,M.(2011).OperationsManagementServiceLearningCaseStudy:Using
OptimizationtoIncreasetheEffectivenessoftheSIFEStudentCarePackageProgram.Advances
inBusinessResearch,2(1):156162.
Yorio,P.l.&Ye,F.(2012).AMetaAnalysisontheeffectsofServiceLearningontheSocial,Personal,
andCognitiveOutcomesofLearning.AcademyofManagementLearning&Education,11(1):9
27.
JournalofBusinessManagementandEconomicResearch(JOBMER),vol.3,issue.9,pp.1733
33
Wang,Y.andRodgers,R.(2006).ImpactofServiceLearningandSocialJusticeEducationonCollege
Students’CognitiveDevelopment,NASPAJournal,43(2):316337.
Wilcox,E.andZigurs,I.(2003).AMethodforEnhancingtheSuccessofServiceLearningProjectsin
InformationSystemsCurricula.InformationSystemsEducationJournal,1(17).Availableat
http://isedj.org/1/17/.ISSN:1545679X.(AlsoappearsinTheProceedingsofISECON2003:
§3431.ISSN:15427382.),consultedin14032018.
Williams,A.&Lankford,S.(1999).ServiceLearning:youcangettherefromhere,SCHOLE:AJournal
ofLeisureStudiesandRecreationEducation,14(1):3757.Availableat
https://doi.org/10.1080/1937156X.1999.11949439,consultedin17112018.
... There are many benefits to service-learning pedagogy for general student development and for promoting positive and transformational creativity specifically. According to Pereira and Costa, service-learning pedagogy utilizes unique assumptions, creating an integration of learning technical and scientific knowledge with personal, social, and community development [19]. This community development can be thought of as a process of creating positive and transformational creative products to help further develop the community in creative ways. ...
... This community development can be thought of as a process of creating positive and transformational creative products to help further develop the community in creative ways. The authors also specifically mention positive creativity when they state, "this methodology permits the student to realize interdisciplinary work and produce plasticity on [their] creativity whilst producing cognitive, personal, social, emotional and transcendental knowledge," [19] (p. 17). ...
Article
Full-text available
Positive creativity involves creative ideas and products that are beneficial to humanity. This paper discusses the importance of fostering positive and transformational creativity in PK-12 and college settings, and concrete classroom strategies for nurturing positive creativity through a service learning pedagogy. A brief history of service learning pedagogy is discussed, along with a practical application of the K-12 Developmental Service Learning Typology, a theoretical service learning pedagogical model. This practical application highlights three examples of how service learning can foster positive and transformational creativity: experiential learning through community service or volunteering, problem-based learning through community exploration, and using Destination Imagination as a form of social or community activism. The latter two examples demonstrate using curiosity to create positive, novel, and useful products through a cycle of deep exploration of topics that each student has an intense interest in, called the Roberts Curiosity Community Exploration Cycle (R-CCEC).
... Many researchers have introduced the service-learning theory to PSTs' training (e.g., Kula, 2021). Service-learning is a method of experiential education where the knowledge or teaching skills that PSTs learn in classes can be applied to real-world problems and real-world needs (Pereira & Costa, 2019). It is often used to provide teachers with opportunities to confront challenges in complex natural contexts and to help teachers gain practical knowledge and teaching strategies that are transferable to new situations. ...
... Based on the results, compared with the educational practice training module, SLBM-TAIS exhibited some effects on PSTs' practical knowledge and motivation towards AI, as well as primary school students' attitude towards AI. This study found that PSTs' practical knowledge and its six dimensions significantly improved after using SLBM-TAIS (Pereira & Costa, 2019). Consistent with previous studies, SLBM-TAIS was able to meet the conditions and needs of PSTs' practical knowledge better than the traditional educational practice training (Yanchar, 2016). ...
Article
Full-text available
The purpose of this study is twofold: 1) to develop a service-learning-based module training artificial intelligence (AI) subject (SLBM-TAIS), and 2) to evaluate the effect of SLBM-TAIS on pre-service teachers' (PSTs') practical knowledge and motivation, as well as primary school students' attitude towards AI in China. Participants of this study comprised 60 PSTs and 107 primary school students. The experimental research in this study followed the quasi-experimental non-randomized pre-test and post-test control group design. The PSTs were divided into experimental and control groups, and the primary school students followed the same grouping. The PSTs in the experimental group taught AI subjects to the primary school students in the experimental group, while the PSTs in the control group taught AI subjects to the primary school students in the control group. The results of the study showed that SLBM-TAIS was effective in training PSTs to teach AI subjects to primary school students. Furthermore, the SLBM-TAIS developed in this study offered a unique technique for training PSTs and primary school students that could increase PSTs' practical knowledge and motivation, as well as primary school students' attitudes toward AI. The findings from this study are important in the field of educational psychology, and its contribution has several theoretical and practical implications.
... Both institutions are co-responsible for the identified situation. Therefore, innovating the academic curriculum, with the participation of companies Pereira & Costa [7,8]; [13][14][15], can be an input to balance the demand and offer of such skills and inspire ...
Article
Full-text available
Managing responsibly is one of the concerns of current economic agents, both as a group and individually. Nonetheless, the employees’ lack of holistic skills is an obstacle to the implementation of corporate/ business cultures targeted at those objectives. Its absence hinders the experience in environments of harmony, respect, tolerance, social responsibility and commitment. As these values are deemed rather strategic in the performance and competitiveness of companies, we should discuss at length and in-depth the importance of University-Company interaction for the training of new citizens for the construction of a more attractive, friendly and dignified society. Keywords: Holistic skills; Managing responsibly; Spiritual capital; Social responsibility
Article
Full-text available
The concept of Yunus Social Business is taught in multiple universities across the world. California State University Channel Islands (CSUCI) has been offering courses and a Minor in Social Business since 2010. The Social Business courses at CSUCI integrate semester-long Service Learning projects as a key experiential component that facilitates and enhances the Social Business learning experience of the students. This paper presents an overview of the CSUCI Social Business Courses including the Service Learning projects, describes key design activities, introduces the stakeholders involved and discusses the positive outcomes and challenges encountered. The paper aims to spark a meaningful discussion about impactful pedagogies for Yunus Social Business across higher education institutions worldwide.
Article
Full-text available
Purpose Planned episodic change programs, rigid processes and traditional structures, optimized for efficiency rather than agility, are no longer appropriate in a context where competitive advantage is fueled by high-speed innovation, supported by a more entrepreneurial mindset. The purpose of this two part paper is to offer a review of relevant research to provide an informed case for continuous strategic transformation facilitated by enhanced organizational agility. The concept of agility is explored, defined and a framework for categorizing agility-enhancing capabilities is presented. Specific aspects of this agility framework are examined to better understand how these interrelated competencies contribute to overall corporate performance in this fast-paced world. Design/methodology/approach A range of published empirical and practitioner research articles were reviewed to study the concepts of organizational agility and transformation as critical factors contributing to sustained competitive advantage, organizational performance and survival in the increasingly competitive global context. This literature review explores how organizations are overcoming the challenges imposed by their traditional structures, cultures and leadership models and identifies dynamic competencies to be developed to achieve a greater level of corporate agility. Findings Increased organizational agility increases the ability to respond proactively to unexpected environmental changes. The commitment to continuous transformation and agile strategies implies changes at all levels of the organization from its structure, through its leadership and decision-making dynamics, down to the skills and interpersonal relationships of the individuals implementing the agile mission. Research limitations/implications There is a gap in the literature with respect to agility, namely, that most research focuses on the characteristics of agile organizations, with little attention given to how to develop agile capabilities and embed the commitment to continuous change deep into the corporate DNA, beyond the process level, into the psyche of the people driving the organization. Practical implications Managers should consider agility as an overarching principle guiding strategic and operational activities. Fostering agility-enhancing capabilities will be paramount in ensuring the successful integration of agility as a performance enhancing paradigm. Social implications For small- and medium-sized companies with limited resources, this reality makes staying relevant an uphill battle but also opens windows of opportunity. The challenge of the next century for large organizations will be to rekindle their innovative agile beginnings and for start-ups to continue to foster their dynamic capabilities as they grow. Originality/value The paper provides practical and empirical evidence of the importance of enterprise agility and specific dynamic capabilities on firm performance.
Article
Full-text available
Educators in psychology should aspire to encourage students’ holistic growth in academic, personal, and civic domains. We propose that service learning is the most potent pedagogy for developing well-rounded, psychologically literate citizens capable of meeting the goals for the undergraduate psychology major. This article defines service learning, delineates the rationales for service learning, and summarizes research demonstrating the efficacy of this pedagogical approach. The article also describes the learning objectives derived from the American Psychological Association Guidelines for the Undergraduate Major (Version 2.0, 2013), with an emphasis on the ways in which service learning contributes to academic learning, civic learning, and personal growth. Finally, the article illustrates the four types of service learning, and it provides a concrete example for structuring reflection in order to connect community experiences with course content in a service learning psychology course.
Article
Service learning is experiential education engaged in by students. These experiential activities address human and community needs and are accompanied by structured opportunities specifically designed to promote student learning and development. This paper explores the increasing use of service learning methodology in higher education and in leisure studies curricula. The components of service learning methodology will be examined, along with a model that helps explain the process. Additionally, concerns and benefits associated with the use of service learning will be addressed. Finally, implications for adopting service learning methodology into leisure studies curricula will be explored. Suggestions will be offered that will aid in transforming existing learning experiences into true service learning opportunities.
Purpose Colleges and universities increasingly have the mandate and motivation to integrate sustainability into their curricula. The purpose of this paper is to share the strategy used at the University of Pennsylvania (Penn) and provide an evaluation of its success and guidance to others creating similar programs. Design/methodology/approach This article summarizes Penn’s Integrating Sustainability Across the Curriculum (ISAC) program. ISAC pairs Penn undergraduate research assistants with instructors in a collaborative effort to incorporate sustainability into courses. Findings In concert with other Penn initiatives (a course inventory, faculty discussion groups and a research network), ISAC increases Penn’s sustainability-related courses and creates dialogue regarding how various disciplines contribute to sustainability. Practical implications The program described in this article is replicable at other institutions. The authors demonstrate that the logistics of recruiting students and establishing the program are straightforward. Undergraduate students are on campus; their pay requirements are modest; and they are desirous of such research experiences. Social implications The ISAC program inculcates a cultural and behavioral shift as students and faculty approach sustainability issues collaboratively, and it facilitates the development of a shared language of environmental sustainability. Such social implications are difficult to quantify, but are nonetheless valuable outcomes. Originality/value The faculty–student partnership used to facilitate the integration of sustainability into courses at Penn is original. The ISAC program provides a framework for engaging students and faculty in curriculum development around sustainability in a manner that benefits the student research assistants, the participating faculty and future students.
Article
Purpose The purpose of the paper is to describe the relevance and application of insights from the field of neuroscience on practice and thinking of human resources (HRs). Design/methodology/approach It draws on the experience, views and insights of the authors in providing the context, some of the key insights from neuroscience relevant to the field and examples of people management and development practices. Findings The paper reinforces the view of the relevance and importance of using better understanding of human behaviour through neuroscience to drive more effective people management and development practices. Originality/value Understanding and application of neuroscience insights to HR practices and processes is still in its early stages. The article challenges the need for a wider shift in thinking and philosophy across business to take a more human centred approach to address the shifts and challenges of the modern workplace and workforces.
Article
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to summarize the benefits of including a service learning project in college classes and focusses on benefits to all stakeholders, including students, community, and faculty. Design/methodology/approach – Using a snowball approach in academic databases as well as a nominal group technique to poll faculty, key topics for service learning across college disciplines are presented. Findings – Findings include a wide range of service learning projects across disciplines. Research limitations/implications – Areas for future research are identified to expand the service learning topic list as well as guide studies on the long-term benefit of service learning for each identified stakeholder. Practical implications – For new faculty or faculty new to service learning, the list of paper ideas is a good first step to identify projects. While not comprehensive, the list serves to stimulate topic ideas and fills a void in the service learning literature. Social implications – Service learning exists to provide real-world learning for students, but the projects provide benefits for community groups, agencies, and organizations. Societal benefits from the student effort are numerous and there are little or no costs to the agencies who participate. Originality/value – The abundance of service learning literature has studied learning across disciplines and has quantitatively and qualitatively presented benefits, but no studies have worked to compile project ideas across major college disciplines. This research addresses this issue and provides the key first step to implement the service learning pedagogy: the topic idea.