New Caledonia is currently going through a period of political changes. With its dependence from France to be voted on in the upcoming second self-determination referendum happening in mid-year 2020, New Caledonia‘s future is unpredictable. New Caledonia has a complex colonial past, and its future does not look simpler. Colonised by the French in the 19th century, New Caledonia has been going through many periods of conflicts between Kanak often wanting independence (called independentists) and French wanting to stay with France (called loyalists). With the peak of conflicts happening during the period of The Events and the Accords of Matignon (1988) and Nouméa (1998) leading to the current period of referendums, New Caledonia’s politics has been divided over what the future of the territory should look like. With the issue of political sovereignty being at the heart of current New Caledonia’s politics, the question is being asked whether the territory is a region of France or a nation-state. Either way, political parties need to appeal to the community to support their position on what is New Caledonia and what it should look like in the future. By focusing on three major theories of national identity’s construction with Anderson, Billig and Smith as well as the concept of settler national identity by Vercacini, this dissertation will analyse political discourses from politicians in New Caledonia. Looking at the political conversations of two memorable political leaders from the past, Tjibaou and Lafleur, as well as the vision of three current political parties, the UC-FLNKS, L’Avenir en Confiance and Generation.nc, this dissertation will explain three different views when it comes to discussing national identity in New Caledonia.