Content uploaded by Alliance Kubayi
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Alliance Kubayi on Oct 22, 2019
Content may be subject to copyright.
Available via license: CC BY-NC-ND
Content may be subject to copyright.
JournalofHumanKineticsvolume69/2019,231‐238DOI:10.2478/hukin‐2019‐0015231
SectionIII–SportsTraining
1‐DepartmentofSport,RehabilitationandDentalSciences,TshwaneUniversityofTechnology,SouthAfrica.
Authorssubmittedtheircontributiontothearticletotheeditorialboard.
AcceptedforprintingintheJournalofHumanKineticsvol.69/2019inSeptember2019.
TrendsofGoalScoringPatternsinSoccer:ARetrospective
AnalysisofFiveSuccessiveFIFAWorldCupTournaments
by
AllianceKubayi1,AbelToriola1
Thisstudyanalysedthe795goalsscoredduringatotalof320matchesplayedinfivesuccessiveFIFAWorld
Cuptournaments(1998–2014).DatawereobtainedthroughYouTubevideosandanalysedbymeansofLongomatch
software.Thevariablesanalysedincludedthenumberofgoalsscoredperhalf(45‐minperiod),per15‐minperiod,andper
30‐minperiodofextratime,goalscoringzones,goalsscoredbysubstitutes,typesofgoalsscored,andgoalsscored
accordingtotheplayingposition.Withregardto15‐minperiodanalysis,mostgoalswerescoredbetweenthe76thand
90thminutes(24.7%)ofthegameinallfiveWorldCupcompetitions.Chi‐squareanalysesshowednosignificant(p>
0.05)differencesinthefrequencyofgoalscoringpatternsper45‐minand15‐minperiodsinthefiveWorldCup
tournaments.Mostgoalswerescoredfrominsidethegoal(23.8%)andpenalty(14.6%)areas.Thegreatestnumberof
goalswasscoredbystrikers(54.2%),followedbymidfielders(33.3%)anddefenders(2.3%).Thesefindingsprovide
practicalimplicationsforimprovinggoal‐scoringperformanceinsoccer.
Keywords:soccer,tactics,videoanalysis,goals,performance.
Introduction
Soccerisundoubtedlytheworld’smost
popularsport,playedbymorethan240million
peopleasmembersof1.4millionteams(Acaretal.,
2009).Itwasreportedthatthe2014FIFAWorld
CupinBrazilattractedaglobaltelevisionaudience
of3.2billionpeople,withmorethanonebillion
peoplewatchingthefinal(FIFA,2015).Ofcourse,
thesoccerWorldCupprovidesanopportunityto
observethebestteamsandplayersintheworld.In
additiontotheanthropometric,psychological,and
physiologicalresearch,performanceanalysis
amongsoccerplayersintermsoftechniquesand
tacticshasbecomepopular(Acaretal.,2009;
Castellanoetal.,2012;Clementeetal.,2015;Moura,
etal.,2015;Smpokosetal.2018).
Regardlessofthepopularityassociated
withthesport,alownumberofgoalsscored
duringamatchisoneofthefeaturesofmodern
soccer(Phukanetal.,2015;Kalinowskietal.,2019).
Thistrendisstrikingconsideringthefactthatgoal
scoringprovidesthemostexcitingandfascinating
positiveexperienceforsoccerfansaswellas
coachesandanalysts.Therefore,itisessentialthat
soccercoachesandtechnicalstaffpaymore
attentiontogoalscoringpatternsassuch
informationcanbehelpfulindevisingstrategies
thatcouldmaximiseteamsuccess.Despitea
plethoraofstudiesontheanalysisofgoalsscored
insoccer(e.g.,Acaretal.,2009;Njororai,2013;
Phukanetal.,2015;YiannakosandArmatas,2006),
mostpreviousresearchhasbeenlimitedtoone
tournament,eitheratthenationalorinternational
level.Indeed,thereisadearthofresearch
concerningthegoalscoringtrendsintheFIFA
WorldCup.
Todate,onlyonestudycouldbefound,
whichwasconductedbyArmatasetal.(2007)and
focussedontherelationshipbetweentimeandgoal
scoringinthe1998,2002,and2006FIFAWorld
Cups.Theresultsindicatedthatmostgoalswere
scoredinthesecondhalfofthegameinallthree
WorldCuptournaments.Withregardto15‐min
analysis,itwasfoundthatmostgoalswerescored
betweenthe76thand90thminofthegame,andthe
highestnumberofgoalswasrecordedtowardsthe
232 Trendsofgoalscoringpatternsinsoccer
JournalofHumanKinetics‐volume69/2019http://www.johk.pl
endofmatches(Armatasetal.,2007).Althoughthe
studybyArmatasetal.(2007)hasprovided
baselineinformationwithreferencetothegoal
scoringpatternsfromaninternationalperspective,
itisnotwithoutlimitations,withthemostnotable
beingtherestrictiontogoalscoringfrequency(i.e.,
goalsscoredper45‐minand15‐minperiods).Asa
result,theirstudydidnotprovideacomplete
pictureofthegoalscoringpatternsatFIFAWorld
Cupcompetitions.
Therefore,thisstudyseeksto
retrospectivelyanalysethegoalscoringpatterns
andtrendsinthelastfivesuccessiveFIFAWorld
Cuptournaments(1998–2014).Specifically,the
objectivesofthestudyweretoexaminethe
frequencyofgoalsscored,goalscoringzones,the
numberofgoalsscoredbysubstitutes,typesof
goalsscored(setplayoropenplay),andgoals
scoredaccordingtotheplayingposition.AsAbtet
al.(2002)argued,analysisofgoalscoringpatterns
couldprovidehelpfulinformationtobothcoaches
andsportsscientists,astherelationshipbetween
goalscoringandtimewouldappeartobelinkedto
thoseaspectsofplaywhichinherentlychangeasa
matchprogresses,suchasphysicalconditioning
andtacticalplay.
Methods
Followinginstitutionalethicsapproval,64
matchesfromeachofthefivesuccessiveFIFA
WorldCups(1998–France,2002–Korea/Japan,
2006–Germany,2010–SouthAfrica,and2014–
Brazil)werestudied(N=320matches).TheFIFA
WorldCuptournamentwasselectedbecauseit
involvedtheparticipationoftopinternational
teamsfromallovertheworld(Armatasetal.,
2007).DatawereobtainedthroughYouTube
videos,whichwasasimilardatacollection
proceduretothatusedinpreviousresearchon
soccer(Furleyetal.,2017).Thematcheswere
analysedbytheprincipalresearcherusing
Longomatchsoftwareinwhichallactionswere
recordedonanelectronicsheet.
Thevariablesanalysedincludedthe
frequencyofgoalsscoredperhalf(firsthalf,
secondhalf,extratime),15‐minperiod(1–15,16–
30,31–45,45–60,61–75,76–90),and30‐minperiod
ofextratime(91–105,105–120),goalscoringzones
(penalties,insidethegoalarea,insidethepenalty
area,outsidethepenaltyarea),thenumberofgoals
scoredbysubstitutes,typesofgoalsscored(open
playorsetplay),andthenumberofgoalsscored
accordingtotheplayingposition(defender,
midfielder,striker).Foreaseofanalysis,allthe
goalsscoredatthefivesuccessiveFIFAWorldCup
tournamentsweretalliedandcombined.
Thereafter,allvariableswereenteredintoa
MicrosoftExcel®spreadsheet,importedinto
StatisticalPackageforSocialSciences(SPSS)
softwareandanalyseddescriptively(frequencies
andpercentages).AChi‐squaretestwasusedto
examinesignificantdifferencesinthefrequencyof
goalsscored.Thelevelofsignificancewassetatp
≤0.05.
Results
Atotalof795goalswerescoredin320
matchesplayedinthelastfivesuccessiveFIFA
WorldCups.Mostgoalswerescoredatthe1998
(anaverageof2.67permatch)and2014(an
averageof2.67permatch)WorldCup
tournaments,whiletheleastwererecordedduring
the2006(anaverageof2.30permatch)and2010
(anaverageof2.27permatch)competitions(Table
1).
Withregardto15‐minperiodanalysis,
mostgoalswerescoredduringthe76th–90thmin
(24.7%)periodofthegameinallfiveWorldCups.
Thelowestnumberofgoalswasobservedbetween
the16thand30thminutesofthematchesinthe1998
(11.1%)and2002(11.8%)tournaments,andalsoin
thefirst15minutesofthematchesinthe2006
(15.6%),2010(9.7%),and2014(10.5%)
tournaments.Chi‐squareanalysesshowedno
significant(p>0.05)differencesinthefrequencyof
goalscoringpatternsper15‐minperiodinthefive
WorldCups.Despitethisnon‐significant
difference,thefrequencyofgoalscoringwastime
dependent,andgoalswerescoredastime
progressed(Figure1).
Table2showszonesfromwhichgoals
werescoredduringtheWorldCupevents.Overall,
inallthecompetitions,fewgoalswerescoredfrom
penalties(8.0%)andfromoutsidethepenaltyarea
(14.6%),whilemostgoalswerescoredfrominside
thegoal(23.8%)andpenalty(53.6%)areas.
Figure2illustratesthepatternsofgoals
scoredbysubstitutesinthefiveWorldCup
competitions.Theresultsshowedthatsubstitutes
scoredmoregoalsin2006(15.6%)and2014(18.7%)
thanin1998(8.8%)and2002(13.0%).
Figure3illustratesthetypesofgoals
byAllianceKubayiandAbelToriola233
©EditorialCommitteeofJournalofHumanKinetics
scored.Overall,mostgoalswerescoredfromopen
play,withthehighestnumberofgoalsrecordedin
2010(75.9%)and2014(77.8%).The1998(63.7%)
and2006(68.7%)WorldCupcompetitionshadthe
leastgoalsfromopenplay.
Mostsetplaygoalswerescoredin1998(36.3%)
and2006(31.3%),decliningto24.1%and22.2%in
2010and2014,respectively.
Table3presentsthedistributionofgoals
accordingtotheplayerposition.Asexpected,most
goalswerescoredbystrikers(54.2%),followedby
midfielders(33.3%)anddefenders(10.2%),inall
theWorldCups.
Table1
Goalscoringfrequency(FIFAWorldCuptournaments:1998–2014)
Timeinterval19982002 200620102014Total
01–1525±14.625±15.523±15.614±9.718±10.5105±13.2
16–30 19±11.119±11.8 24±16.323±15.925±14.6110±13.8
31–4526±15.225±15.523±15.622±15.222±12.9118±14.8
45–6031±18.128±17.419±12.922±15.224±14.0124±15.6
61–75 24±14.030±18.611±7.527±18.633±19.3125±15.7
76–9045±26.331±19.344±29.935±24.141±24.0196±24.7
Extratime
91–10500±0.002±1.201±0.701±0.603±1.807±0.9
105–12001±0.601±0.602±1.401±0.605±2.910±1.3
Total 171±100161±100147±100145±100171±100795±100
Numberof
gamesplayed
6464646464320
Average 2.672.522.302.272.672.48
Valuesarereportedasfrequenciesandpercentages
Figure1
Goalscoringdistribution(FIFAWorldCuptournaments:1998–2014)
234 Trendsofgoalscoringpatternsinsoccer
JournalofHumanKinetics‐volume69/2019http://www.johk.pl
Table2
Goalscoringzones(FIFAWorldCuptournaments:1998–2014)
Timeinterval19982002 200620102014Total
Penalties 17±9.913±8.113±8.809±6.212±7.064±8.0
Outsidethepenalty
area
20±11.725±15.526±17.726±17.919±11.1116±14.6
Insidethegoalarea 41±24.039±24.235±23.831±21.443±25.2189±23.8
Insidethepenalty
area
93±54.484±52.273±49.779±54.597±56.7426±53.6
Valuesarereportedasfrequenciesandpercentages
Figure2
Numberofgoalsscoredbysubstitutes(FIFAWorldCuptournaments:1998–2014)
byAllianceKubayiandAbelToriola235
©EditorialCommitteeofJournalofHumanKinetics
Figure3
Typesofgoalsscored(FIFAWorldCuptournaments:1998–2014)
Table3
Analysesofgoalscoringaccordingtotheplayerposition(FIFAWorldCuptournaments:
1998–2014)
19982002 200620102014Total
Strikers93±54.488±54.779±53.777±53.194±55.0431±54.2
Midfielder59±34.553±32.947±32.050±34.556±32.7265±33.3
Defenders15±8.817±10.517±11.616±11.016±9.481±10.2
Owngoal04±2.303±1.904±2.702±1.405±2.918±2.3
Valuesarereportedasfrequenciesandpercentages
236 Trendsofgoalscoringpatternsinsoccer
JournalofHumanKinetics‐volume69/2019http://www.johk.pl
Discussion
Theaimofthisstudywasto
retrospectivelyanalysethetrendsofgoalscoring
patternsinfivesuccessiveFIFAWorldCup
tournaments.Overall,thisstudyfoundthatthe
goalscoringpatternsweretimedependent.Itwas
alsonotedthatthenumberofgoalsscored
increasedasagameprogressed,withthehighest
proportionofgoalsrecordedinthelast15minutes
ofthematch.Giventhatthesampleofthisstudy
comprisedfiveWorldCupcompetitions,the
presentfindingssupportthoseofprevious
research(Abtetal.,2002),whichreportedan
upwardtrendinthegoalscoringfrequencyover
thecourseofthegame.Mostgoalsbeingscoredin
thefinal15‐minperiodofthegamecouldbe
attributedtofactorssuchasdifferencesin
conditioninglevelsandlapsesofconcentration
amongplayers(Acaretal.,2009).This
phenomenoncouldbeexplainedbyplayerfatigue
towardstheendofthegame.Playerswhohave
betterphysicalconditioningareabletominimise
theeffectsoffatigue,especiallytowardstheendof
thegame,whentheytendtogainanadvantage
overtheiropponentswithinferiorconditioning
(Abtetal.,2002;Carlingetal.,2005).
Similarly,concedinggoalstowardsthe
endofthegamecouldbeassociatedwith‘mental
fatigue’amongplayersasaresultofcontinued
physicaleffort,whichcouldleadtotactical
mistakesandunforcederrorsthatopenupgoal
scoringopportunities(Carlingetal.,2005).Thelate
surgeingoalscoringmayalsobeattributedto
players’timeconsciousnessandurgencyinspiteof
thedeclineinphysicalcapabilities.Carlingetal.
(2005)furtherindicatedthatduetothefactthat
criticalincidentsincontestingballpossession
usuallyoccurredinthefinal15minutesofthe
game,goalscoringchancesweremorelikelyto
increase.Despitetheoccurrenceoffatigue,ateam
thatisphysically,mentally,tactically,and
technicallypreparedtoenduretheentire90
minutesofintensematchplayismorelikelytobe
aneffectiveandcohesiveunit(Carlingetal.,2005).
Strategiessuchasensuringadequate
hydrationpriortoandduringthematch,aswellas
dietarymanipulation,candelaytheeffectsof
fatigue(Abtetal.,2002).Carlingetal.(2005)
reiteratedthatplayerswithsoundnutritional
preparationformatchestendedtoshowamore
stablework‐rateprofilethroughoutthegamethan
thosewhopreparedcasually.Additionally,the
mannerinwhichsubstitutesareutilisedbythe
coachplaysanimportantroleinpreventingthe
occurrenceoffatiguetowardstheendofthegame
(Abtetal.,2002).Thepresentstudyshowedthat
substituteplayersscoredmostgoalsduringthe
2014FIFAWorldCup.Theoverallworkrateof
substitutescouldalsoassistfatiguedplayers.For
example,intheirstudy,Mohretal.(2003)found
that13substitutescovered25%moredistance
duringthelastquarterofthegame,engagingin
morehigh‐intensityrunningthantheother
players.
Resultsofthepresentstudyfurther
showedthatmostgoalswerescoredfromopen
play,withanoticeableincreasebetweenthe2006
and2014WorldCupcompetitions.Incontrast,the
numberofsetplaygoalsdecreasedconsiderably
betweenthe2006and2014WorldCups.Mostgoals
werescoredfrominsidethepenaltyarea.A
plausiblereasonforthisfindingcouldbethatitis
easiertoscoregoalsfromthislocation(Yanci,
2015).Anotherpossibleexplanationcouldbethat
theplayersprefertobenearthegoalpost,butnot
inthegoalkeeper’srangesothattheycanshootthe
ballwithlessdistraction(Muhammdetal.,2013).
Thefactthatfewergoalswerescoredfromoutside
thepenaltyareamaybeascribedtohigh‐quality
goalkeepingandcompactdefencestructures.
Similarly,therelativelyfewgoalsscoredfrom
outsidethepenaltyareamaybeareflectionofthe
teams’abilitytodefendefficientlyandeffectively
intheirownareas(UEFA,2016).Itisnotsurprising
inthepresentstudythatmostgoalswerescoredby
strikers.However,theefficiencyofdefendersand
midfieldersinmovingforwardclosetothegoal
areaputspressureontheoppositionteamand
increaseschancesofgoalscoring(Acaretal.,2009).
Conclusion
Theresultsofthisstudyshowedthata
totalof795goalswerescoredduring320games,
withmostgoalsrecordedinthe1998and2014
FIFAWorldCuptournaments.Concerningthe15‐
minanalysis,mostgoalswererecordedbetween
the76thand90thminutesinallfiveWorldCup
competitions.Itwasfurtherfoundthatthehighest
proportionofgoalsemergedfrominsidethegoal
andpenaltyareas.Theresultsalsoshowedthat
mostgoalswerescoredbystrikers,followedby
midfieldersanddefenders,inalltheWorldCup
byAllianceKubayiandAbelToriola237
©EditorialCommitteeofJournalofHumanKinetics
tournaments.Soccercoachesshouldtakenoteof
thefindingsofthepresentstudyinorderto
increasegoal‐scoringopportunities.Future
researchshouldfocusoninvestigatingthe
offensivetacticsofgoalscoringpatternsinsoccer.
Practicalimplications
Basedonthefindingsofthisstudy,several
recommendationscanbemade.First,thisstudy
suggeststhatsoccercoachesshouldensurethat
playersaregivensufficientphysicalconditioning
toendurethefull90+minutesofthegame.Players
whoarephysicallypreparedare
likelytohavehigherlevelsofconcentration,which
willminimiseerrorssuchaspoormarking,
committingfouls,andsoforth.Second,strategies
suchasdietarymanipulationandadequate
hydrationbeforeandduringmatchesshouldbe
applied,astheymaydelaytheonsetoffatigue
throughoutthegame.Finally,itshouldbenoted
thatmatchanalysisshouldnotberegardedasan
endinitself,astheoutcomeofasoccermatchis
determinedbymultidimensionalfactorssuchas
fitnessandpsychologicalpreparation,among
others.However,itisimportantforsoccercoaches
toincludetheresultsofmatchanalysesaspartof
theirtrainingprogrammeinordertomaximisethe
overallsuccessoftheirteams.
References
AbtGA,DicksonG,MummeryWK.Goalscoringpatternsoverthecourseofamatch:Ananalysisofthe
AustralianNationalSoccerLeague.InSpinksW,ReillyT,MurphyT(Eds.),ScienceandFootballIV(pp.
107‐111).London:Routledge;2002
AcarMF,YapiciogluB,ArikanN,YalcinS,AtesN,ErgunM.Analysisofgoalsscoredinthe2006WorldCup.
InReillyT,KorkusuzF(Eds.),InScienceandFootballVI(pp.235‐242).London:Routledge;2009
ArmatasV,YiannakosA,SileloglouP.Relationshipbetweentimeandgoalscoringinsoccergames:analysis
ofthreeWorldCups.IntJPerfAnalSport,2007;7:48‐58
CarlingC,WilliamsA,ReillyT.Thehandbookofsoccermatchanalysis:Asystematicapproachtoimproving
performance.London:Routledge;2005
CastellanoJ,CasamichanaD,Lago‐PenasC.Theuseofmatchstatisticsthatdiscriminatebetweensuccessful
andunsuccessfulsoccerteams.JHumKinet,2012;31:139‐147
ClementeFM,CouceiroMS,MartinsFML,MendesRS.Usingnetworkmetricsinsoccer:amacro‐analysis.J
HumKinet,2015;45:123‐134
FIFA.2014FIFAWorldCup™reached3.2billionviewers,onebillionwatchedfinal‐Recentfindings,2015.
Availableathttp://www.fifa.com/worldcup/news/y=2015/m=12/news.Accessedon20.06.2017
FurleyP,NoëlB,MemmertD.Attentiontowardsthegoalkeeperanddistractionduringpenaltyshootoutsin
associationfootball:aretrospectiveanalysisofpenaltyshootoutsfrom1984to2012.JSportSci,2017;
35:873‐879
KalinowskiP,BojkowskiŁ,ŚliwowskiR.Motorandpsychologicalpredispositionsforplayingfootball.
TRENDSSportSci,2019;2(26):51‐56
MohrM,KrustrupP,BangsboJ.Matchperformanceofhigh‐standardsoccerplayerswithspecialreferenceto
developmentoffatigue.JSportSci,2003;21:519‐528
MouraFA,SantanaJE,VieiraNA,SantiagoPRP,CunhaSA.Analysisofsoccerplayers’positionalvariability
duringthe2012UEFAEuropeanChampionship:Acasestudy.JHumKinet,2015;47(1):225‐236
MuhammdS,NorasrudinS,RahmatA.Differencesingoalscoringandpassingsequencesbetweenwinning
andlosingteaminUEFA‐EUROChampionship2012.IntJSocBehavEducEcoManagetEng,2013;7:
224‐229
NjororaiWWS.Analysisofgoalsscoredinthe2010WorldCupsoccertournamentheldinSouthAfrica.JPhys
EducSport,2013;13:6‐13
238 Trendsofgoalscoringpatternsinsoccer
JournalofHumanKinetics‐volume69/2019http://www.johk.pl
PhukanS,SinghOJ,ThapaS.AnalysisofgoalscoringpatternatInterCollegeFootballTournament.IntJAppl
Res,2015;1:219‐220
SmpokosE,MourikisCh,LinardakisM.Seasonalchangesofphysical(motor)activitiesinprofessionalGreek
footballplayers.TRENDSSportSci,2018;2(25):99‐107
UEFA.Howthe108goalsatUEFAEURO2016wentin‐Recentfindings2016.Availableat
http://www.uefa.com/uefaeuro/news/newsid=2387449.html;Accessed21.05.2017
YanciJ.Analysisofgoalsscoredbyplayerswithcerebralpalsyinofficialfootball7‐a‐sidematches.Kinesiol,
2015;47:202‐207
YiannakosA,ArmatasV.EvaluationofthegoalscoringpatternsinEuropeanChampionshipinPortugal2004.
IntJPerfAnalSport,2006;6:178‐188
Correspondingauthor:
AllianceKubayi
TshwaneUniversityofTechnology
DepartmentofSport,RehabilitationandDentalSciences
RepublicofSouthAfrica
Pretoria0001
Phonenumber:+27123824272
Faxnumber:+27123825801
E‐mail:kubayina@tut.ac.za