ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

The paper provides basic information on human hand's anatomical structure with the location of joints and consequent types of achievable movements. The biomechanics of the human hand is described using two different kinematic models of the hand. The differences between the models are described. The Schlesinger's classification of movements of the human hand is introduced
Journal of Technology and Exploitation ISSN 2451-148X
in Mechanic al Engine ering Available online at:
Vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 2833, 2017 http://jteme.pl
https://doi.org/10.35784/jteme.536
Review article
28
© Ł. Jaworski, R. Karpiński, Published by Polish Association for Knowledge Promotion, 2017
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0)
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
BIOMECHANICS OF THE HUMAN HAND
Łukasz Jaworski 1, Robert Karpiński2
1 Poznan University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Management, Piotrowo 3 Str.,
60-965 Poznań, Poland, email: lukasz.m.jaworski@student.put.poznan.pl
2 Lublin University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Biomedical Engineering Department,
Nadbystrzycka 36 Str., 20-618 Lublin, Poland, orcid.org/0000-0003-4063-8503, email: robert.karpinski@pollub.edu.pl
Submitted: 2017-06-09 / Accepted: 2017-06-22 / Published: 2017-06-30
ABSTRACT
The paper provides basic information on human hand's anatomical structure with the location of joints and
consequent types of achievable movements. The biomechanics of the human hand is described using two
different kinematic models of the hand. The differences between the models are described. The Schlesinger's
classification of movements of the human hand is introduced.
KEYWORDS: biomechanics, hand, kinematic model, anatomy, joint
BIOMECHANIKA DŁONI LUDZKIEJ
STRESZCZENIE
Praca zawiera podstawowe informacje o budowie anatomicznej dłoni ludzkiej, włącznie z lokalizacją stawów
i wynikających z nich rodzajów osiąganych ruchów. Opisano biomechanikę dłoni ludzkiej używając jej dwóch
różnych modeli kinematycznych. Przedstawiono różnice między modelami. Zaprezentowano klasyfikację typów
chwytów dłoni według Schlesingera.
SŁOWA KLUCZOWE: biomechanika, dłoń, model kinematyczny, anatomia, staw
1. Introduction
The human hand is one of the most extraordinary parts of the entire human body. Thanks to its
remarkable precision people can perform a wide set of various, sometimes complicated tasks from
using a needle to playing an instrument. This ability comes from hand's complex physiology
complicated anatomy merged with advanced muscular system and ligaments.
2. Basic anatomy of the human hand
Due to its structure, the human hand is considered as one of the most complicated and fascinating
part of the human body [1]. It consists of 29 bones connected via numerous joint. The simplest division
distinguishes three main parts of the hand:
the wrist (Latin: carpus),
the palm (Latin: metacarpus),
fingers (Latin: digiti manus).
Journal of Technology and Exploitation in Mechanical Engineering Vol. 3, no. 1, 2017
29
The wrist is composed of eight small carpal bones scaphoid, lunate, triquetrum, pisiform,
trapezium, trapezoid, capitate and hamate, arranged in three columns: the radial scaphoid, the lunate
and ulnar triquetral column. Their main function is to connect the hand with the forearm.
Metacarpal bones, thanks to their structure, are classified as long bones. Each bone consists of
the base articulating with the carpal bones, the body and the head connected to corresponding finger
[2, 3]. Fingers comprise of phalanges from second (index) to fifth (little) they have three phalanges
proximal, intermediate and distal, while the thumb is an exception and lacks the intermediate phalanx
[3]. The anatomical structure of most of the phalanges is similar to the metacarpal bones, with only
the distal phalanges of every finger ending in two condyles (knuckles) [2].
With reference to the aforementioned issues, there are several joints articulating human hand.
Starting from the wrist, there is the radiocarpal joint between the radius bone and carpal bones. The
carpal bones form two types of joints: the midcarpal and intercarpal joints. Midcarpal joints, along with
the radiocarpal joint, enable the hand to perform movements of flexion/extension (towards the palm
or the back of the hand) and radial/ulnar flexion (or deviation towards the thumb or the little finger)
as shown in the Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. Movements on the human wrist [1]
Between the carpal and metacarpal bones there are five carpometacarpal (CMC) joints and only
one of them, the CMC of the thumb, has a wide range of movements, including flexion and extension,
abduction and adduction, circumduction, and opposition. The movements in other CMC joints are
significantly limited [2, 3].
At the base of each proximal phalanx there is the metacarpophalangeal joint, allowing the
movements of flexion, extension, abduction, adduction and circumduction. The joints between
phalanges are called interphalangeal joints. Each finger from the second to the fifth has two
Journal of Technology and Exploitation in Mechanical Engineering Vol. 3, no. 1, 2017
30
interphalangeal joints proximal (between proximal and intermediate phalanx) and distal (between
intermediate and distal phalanx), while in the thumb the articulation occurs only between proximal
and distal, as it lacks the intermediate phalanx. These joints facilitate the movements of flexion and
extension of the phalanges [2, 3].
3. Biomechanics of the human hand
3.1. Kinematic models of the human hand
In terms of kinematics, the hand is an open kinematic chain starting in the wrist joint and ending
in finger joints. Due to the specific structure of human joints, only rotational motions are possible. In
case of structural analysis of the hand as the biomechanism, individual bones are considered as
movable parts, and their joints as kinematic pairs of different classes (class III 3 degrees of freedom,
class IV 2DoF, class V 1 DoF) [4]. It is said that every group of scientists approaching the topic of the
biomechanics of the human hand and its kinematic analysis, depending on the amount of
simplifications and assumed application of the study, presents results and descriptions varying mostly
on the number of the degrees of freedom of the model. In 2008, Sobos et al. presented the model
depicting the human fingers in reference to the wrist comprised of 19 links imitating the corresponding
human bones, and 24 degrees of freedom representing the joints [5].
Fig. 2. The kinematic chains of the human fingers [5]
Morecki et al. [6] developed a similar solution, having 22 degrees of freedom in the palm and
fingers with additional 3 DoFs for the wrist and its connection to the forearm, as shown in the Fig. 3.
Morecki made some simplifications based on the statement, that the joint, where the angular range
of motion was less than 5 degrees (or 2mm in the linear RoM), was considered as a slack and the
motion relatively linear or angular could be ignored. Compared to the Sobos' model, Morecki disabled
the motion in the second and third CMC, as it was insignificant to the motion of second and third finger,
while leaving the ability to rotate fourth and fifth metacarpal bones towards the wrist in corresponding
CMCs (elements 15 and 19 in the Fig. 3). Both models considered both flexion/extension and
abduction/adduction movements of the fingers in all metacarpophalangeal joints [5, 6].
Journal of Technology and Exploitation in Mechanical Engineering Vol. 3, no. 1, 2017
31
3.2. Range of motion of the hand and types of grasp
Due to an extensive research with the use of specialised equipment it was possible to
approximately delimit the range of motion in each joint of the human hand, as shown in Tables 1 and 2.
Certainly, the value may vary depending on the subject, thus it is crucial to examine every case
individually.
Table 1. Range of motion in finger joinst [5]
Finger
Flexion
Extension
Abduction/adduction
Thumb
Trapeziometacarpal
50° - 90°
15°
45° - 60°
Metacarpophalangeal(MCM)
75° - 80°
Interphalangeal (IP)
75° - 80°
- 10°
Index
Carpometacarpal (CMC)
MCP
90°
30° - 40°
60°
Proximal interphalangeal (PIP)
110°
Distal interphalangeal (DIP)
80° - 90°
Middle
CMC
MCP
90°
30° - 40°
45°
PIP
110°
DIP
80° - 90°
Ring
CMC
10°
MCP
90°
30° - 40°
45°
PIP
120°
DIP
80° - 90°
Little
CMC
15°
MCP
90°
30° - 40°
50°
PIP
135°
DIP
90°
Table 2. Range of motion in the wrist [7]
Wrist
Value
flexion
65° - 70°
Extension
70° - 80°
Radial flexion (deviation)
15° - 25°
Ulnar flexion (deviation)
40° - 45°
The large number of joints and muscles, as well as the size of areas of cerebral cortex responsible
for motor and sensory control of the hand, provides the ability to perform a series of various
complicated movements, necessary in daily activities [1]. In 1919, Schlesinger determined six types of
moves representing most of hand’s functions: a cylindrical grasp, a tip or precision pinch, a hook (or snap),
a palmar grasp (also known as an opposition pinch, a spherical (span) grasp and a lateral (key) pinch,
as shown in the Fig. 4 [1, 8].
Journal of Technology and Exploitation in Mechanical Engineering Vol. 3, no. 1, 2017
32
Fig. 3. Morecki's kinematic model of human hand [6]
Fig. 4. Types of grasp [8]
4. Conclusion
The human hand is an extremely complicated manipulator, capable of performing many different
activities. Every injury may effect in losing a part of hand's functionality, which could take its toll on
affected person. In order to minimalise the time and effort essential in the process of the rehabilitation
of the hand it is crucial to understand its biomechanics, apply the knowledge to design more efficient
equipment and in extreme cases involving amputations even to replace a damaged hand with
an advanced prosthesis, reinstating some of hand's functionality.
Journal of Technology and Exploitation in Mechanical Engineering Vol. 3, no. 1, 2017
33
5. References
[1] R. J. Schwarz, C. L. Taylor, The anatomy and mechanics of the human hand, Artificial Limbs,
vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 22 35, 1955.
[2] W. Woźniak, Ed., Wrocław, Anatomia człowieka. Podręcznik dla studentów i lekarzy, Poland:
Elsevier Urban & Partner, 2003.
[3] Z. Ignasiak, Anatomia układu ruchu, Wrocław, Poland: Elsevier Urban & Partner, 2007.
[4] Ł. Jaworski et alBiomechanics of the upper limb, J. Technol. Exploit. Mech. Eng., vol. 2, no. 1,
pp. 53 59, 2016.
[5] S. Cobos et al., Efficient human hand kinematics for manipulation tasks, 2008 IEEE/RSJ
International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Nice, 2008, pp. 2246-2251.
[6] A. Morecki et al., Teoria mechanizmów i manipulatorów, Warsaw, Poland: Wydawnictwo
Naukowo-Techniczne, 2002.
[7] M. M. Marshall et al., The Effects of complex wrist and forearm posture on wrist range
of motion, Human Factors, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 205 213, 1999.
[8] G. Schlesinger, Der mechanische Aufbau der kunstlichen Glieder, Ersatzglieder und Arbeitshilfen,
Berlin, Germany: Springer, 1919, pp. 321-661.
... The joints that control the thumb movement are called trapeziometacarpal (TMC), metacarpophalangeal (MCP), and interphalangeal (IP). The control joints corresponding to the other four fingers are named carpometacarpal (CMC), metacarpophalangeal (MCP), proximal interphalangeal (PIP), and distal interphalangeal (DIP) [7][8][9]. There is a large volume of research on the range of joint motion, including active range of motion (aROM) [10][11][12][13][14][15] and functional range of motion (fROM) which represent activities of daily living [7,11,12,15,16]. ...
... The control joints corresponding to the other four fingers are named carpometacarpal (CMC), metacarpophalangeal (MCP), proximal interphalangeal (PIP), and distal interphalangeal (DIP) [7][8][9]. There is a large volume of research on the range of joint motion, including active range of motion (aROM) [10][11][12][13][14][15] and functional range of motion (fROM) which represent activities of daily living [7,11,12,15,16]. Depending on the joints and movement, fROM is 5° to 28° smaller than the available aROM [11,12,16]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Continuous movements of the hand contain discrete expressions of meaning, forming a variety of semantic gestures. For example, it is generally considered that the bending of the finger includes three semantic states of bending, half bending, and straightening. However, there is still no research on the number of semantic states that can be conveyed by each movement primitive of the hand, especially the interval of each semantic state and the representative movement angle. To clarify these issues, we conducted experiments of perception and expression. Experiments 1 and 2 focused on perceivable semantic levels and boundaries of different motion primitive units from the perspective of visual semantic perception. Experiment 3 verified and optimized the segmentation results obtained above and further determined the typical motion values of each semantic state. Furthermore, in Experiment 4, the empirical application of the above semantic state segmentation was illustrated by using Leap Motion as an example. We ended up with the discrete gesture semantic expression space both in the real world and Leap Motion Digital World, containing the clearly defined number of semantic states of each hand motion primitive unit and boundaries and typical motion angle values of each state. Construction of this quantitative semantic expression will play a role in guiding and advancing research in the fields of gesture coding, gesture recognition, and gesture design.
... Hand prehension, which involves dynamic interactions between the digits and an object's surface, is classified based on functional grasping patterns (Schlesinger, 1919;Hertling and Kessler, 1996; (Li et al., 2002;Lee et al., 2008;Lee et al., 2014;Romano et al., 2019). Among these, the precision pinch (where the fingertips come into close contact to manipulate small objects) and the hook grip (where fingers curl around an object to support its weight) represent two configurations that create transient topological transformations (Jaworski and Karpiński, 2017;Tanrıkulu et al., 2015). When fingers touch or enclose an object, the hand momentarily forms a toroidal structure, altering the spatial distribution of force vectors and temperature gradients (Wang et al., 2023). ...
Preprint
Full-text available
Raynaud's Phenomenon (RP), characterized by episodic reductions in peripheral blood flow, leads to significant discomfort and functional impairment. Existing therapeutic strategies focus on pharmacological treatments, external heat supplementation and exercise-based rehabilitation, but fail to address biomechanical contributions to vascular dysfunction. We introduce a computational approach rooted in topological transformations of hand prehension, hypothesizing that specific hand postures can generate transient geometric structures that enhance thermal and hemodynamic properties. We examine whether a flexed hand posture-where fingers are brought together to form a closed-loop toroidal shape-may modify heat transfer patterns and blood microcirculation. Using a combination of heat diffusion equations, fluid dynamics models and topological transformations, we implement a heat transfer and blood flow simulation to examine the differential thermodynamic behavior of the open and closed hand postures. We show that the closed-hand posture may preserve significantly more heat than the open-hand posture, reducing temperature loss by an average of 1.1 ± 0.3°C compared to 3.2 ± 0.5°C in the open-hand condition (p < 0.01). Microvascular circulation is also enhanced, with a 53% increase in blood flow in the closed-hand configuration (p < 0.01). Therefore, our findings support the hypothesis that maintaining a closed-hand posture may help mitigate RP symptoms by preserving warmth, reducing cold-induced vasoconstriction and optimizing peripheral flow. Overall, our topologically framed approach provides quantitative evidence that postural modifications may influence peripheral vascular function through biomechanical and thermodynamic mechanisms, elucidating how shape-induced transformations may affect physiological and pathological dynamics.
... We have chosen this example as a paradigmatic example because the hand is easily accessible for study through non-invasive, standardized, and cost-effective methods. State-of-the-art hand mesh reconstruction algorithms and various kinematic models can generate mesh models of the hand in different poses and 3D position (Jaworski and Karpiński, 2017). Methods to estimate contact regions between fingers, hand and object surface, by combining marker-based motion capture with deep learning-based hand mesh reconstruction have been proposed by (Hartmann et al., 2023). ...
Preprint
Full-text available
Physical properties such as shape, volume, and size influence the dynamics of biological systems. In this context, we focus on the geometric properties of limb movements and their physiological and biomechanical effects. Using hand grasping as a paradigmatic example, we describe how dynamic changes in geometric configuration can affect the pathophysiology of grasping. We focus on precision pinch, the simplest and most basic form of grasping, where one finger remains stable while another moves against it (Brand and Hollister, 1999). The thumb and index finger come together to grasp small objects with great precision, such as a pen. During the precision pinch, the geometric configuration of the hand changes, modifying the distribution of forces and the functional connectivity between the fingers. These changes may offer a new approach to the biomechanics of artificial arms. While current approaches consider grasps as homogeneous structures, we argue that local variations in hand geometry can lead to new biomedical effects with intriguing operational implications.
... The human hand is one of the most complex parts of the human body composed of 29 bones combined with an advanced muscular and ligamentous system which makes it difficult to study [1]. One of the main functions of the human hand is the object manipulation that allows the performance of several activities of daily living (ADLs). ...
Article
Full-text available
The study of human grasp forces is fundamental for the development of rehabilitation programs and the design of prosthetic hands in order to restore hand function. The purpose of this work was to classify multiple grasp types used in activities of daily living (ADLs) based on finger force data. For this purpose, we developed a deep neural network (DNN) model using finger forces obtained during the performance of six tests through a novelty force sensing resistor (FSR) glove system. A study was carried out with 25 healthy subjects (mean age: 35.4±11.6) all right handed. The DNN classifier showed high overall performance, obtaining an accuracy of 93.19%, a precision of 93.33%, and a F1-score of 91.23%. Therefore, the DNN classifier in combination with the FSR glove system is an important tool for physiotherapists and health professionals to determine and identify finger grasp forces patterns. The DNN model will facilitate the development of tailored and personalized rehabilitation programs for subjects recovering of hand injurie and other hand diseases. In future work, prosthetic hand devices can be optimized to more accurately reproduce natural grasping patterns.
... The human hand is an important part of the human body which has evolved through time to enhance manipulative skills. The anatomy of the hand is formed by wrist (carpus) , palm (metacarpus), and fingers (digiti manus) [16]. The human hand has a total of 27 bones: 8 carpals, 5 metacarpals, and 14 phalanges [4] as illustrated in Figure 1a. ...
Article
Full-text available
Many hand accidents are reported around the world resulting in a necessity to perform a procedure of amputation of the hand. For this consideration, a large number of hand prostheses have been designed. However, the mechanical design of these prostheses present challenges such as kinematic functionality, strength, and cost. The present article analyses the mechanical design of a low-cost practical hand prosthesis using the finite element method with the help of Abaqus commercial software. Functional and technical requirements were considered to consider the biomechanics of the human hand. The hand prosthesis was conferred with 14-degrees-of-freedom (DOF), which gives it the capacity for grips associated with security, stability, dexterity, and sensibility. Additionally, due to practicality and low-cost manufacturing techniques, fused deposition modelling with acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) is proposed. The evaluation of the hand prosthesis was carried out by tensile, flexural, and torsional load conditions. Finally, the mechanical effectiveness of the designed prosthesis was demonstrated since maximum stresses close to 13 MPa were computed, which are less than the yield stress of ABS.
... Additionally, amputees who wish to return to work or live independently can have incredibly varied grip needs [4,5] as part of their instrumental ADLs (IADLs), which present challenges beyond those of the basic ADLs (Table 1). Human hands are a complex system of between 22 and 24 DOF [8] controlled by a vast network of neurons, so all prosthetic hands present simplified movements and reduced DOFs in comparison. Among the prosthetic hands developed, the most common omitted movements are the adduction/abduction of the fingers and the movements of the thumb (see Fig 1 for movement reference). ...
Conference Paper
Human hands play a key role in almost all activities of daily living (ADLs) because it is an incredibly versatile tool capable of complex motion. For individuals who have had a complete loss of the hand, the ability to perform ADLs is impaired. Effective prosthetics accurately simulate the movements of a human hand by providing a high number of degrees of freedom, an efficient control system, and an anthropomorphic appearance. In this paper, the design and construction process of a highly anthropomorphic soft robotic prosthetic hand is outlined. The design specifications of the hand are based on feedback from current and former prosthetic users. The hand endoskeleton was 3D printed using fused deposition modeling techniques and was enclosed in a silicone coating modeled, after a real human hand. The hand presents anthropomorphic design in its realistic bone shapes and in its external covering that is like skin in texture and mechanical properties. The hand utilizes the flexibility of silicone instead of antagonistic tendons which would otherwise add complexity and weight to the prosthetic design. The prototype also includes adduction/abduction of the fingers, which is a common omitted movement in other prosthetics. Testing showed that the hand is capable of effective power and precision grasping.
... Pergerakan tangan terdiri dari 8 tulang carpal kecilscaphoid, lunate, triquetrum, pisiform, trapezium, trapezoid, capitate dan hamate, tersusun dalam 3 kolom : radial scaphoid, lunate dan kolom ulnar triquetral [4]. Fungsi utama dari tulang carpal kecil adalah untuk menghubungkan antara tangan dengan lengan bawah. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background and Objectives: Torticollis is a common pediatric condition, with an incidence of 0.3–2.0%. Studies show that an adequate, tailored, and early treatment helps 90% to 95% of children recover before the first year of life and 97% of patients recover if treatment starts before the first six months. To identify the relationships between variables considered essential in the recovery process of infants with torticollis, we included factors such as the type of torticollis, age at onset of treatment, gender, birth weight, mode of delivery, fetal position in the uterus, the presence of craniofacial deformities, regions affected by postural asymmetries, and duration of the rehabilitation program. The hypothesis of the study is that early initiation of therapy can contribute to achieving favorable outcomes in the recovery process. Material and Methods: This retrospective cohort pilot study was conducted within a rehabilitation facility, spanning a duration of 1 year. The study involved a population of 41 children aged between 0 and 6 months. The rehabilitation program consisted of the application of Vojta therapy. Each session lasted 20 min, with a frequency of three times per week. Results: A total of 41% of those who started therapy in the first 3 months of life were fully recovered after 4–6 weeks of therapy. Of infants who started therapy at 5 and 6 months of age, 15% showed no improvement in measurements from 14 to 16 weeks of age, at which point the use of a cranial orthosis was recommended, and 23% experienced a plateau in measurements from 10 to 14 weeks, requiring the use of a cervical collar in conjunction with therapy. Conclusions: The findings from the study suggest that there may be a correlation between early initiation of therapy and favorable outcomes in the recovery process. The primary factors influencing the duration of recovery were identified as the presence of body asymmetries and the age at which therapy was initiated.
Conference Paper
Full-text available
This work is focused on obtaining efficient human hand models that are suitable for manipulation tasks. A 24 DoF kinematic model of the human hand is defined to realistic movements. This model is based on the human skeleton. Dynamic and static constraints have been included in order to improve the movement realism. Two simplified hand models with 9 and 6 DoF have been developed according to the constraints predefined. These simplified models involve some errors in reconstructing the hand posture. These errors are calculated with respect to the 24 DoF model and evaluated according to the hand gestures. Finally, some criteria are defined to select the hand description best suited to the features of the manipulation task.
Article
In order to minimize the risk of repetitive trauma injuries, postures or motions that place joints near the limits of their range of motion (RoM) should be avoided. Before it can be determined that a posture or motion approaches the limit of a joint's motion, these limits need to be established. Previous research on wrist functionality has focused almost entirely on RoM in two or three isolated planes (flexion/extension, radial/ulnar deviation, and forearm pronation/supination), without investigating potential effects of complex wrist/forearm posture on RoM. Since most practical applications of this wrist motion data involve more than these isolated planar deviations, the effects of complex wrist/forearm posture on wrist functionality need to be understood.
Article
The article presents basics of the human upper limb’s anatomy, including skeletal system, joints and basic division of muscles in the limb. The biomechanics of the upper limb is introduced. The range of performed motions is depicted. The possible applications of anatomy and biomechanics of the upper limb are shown.
Podręcznik dla studentów i lekarzy
  • W Woźniak
  • Ed Wrocław
  • Anatomia Człowieka
W. Woźniak, Ed., Wrocław, Anatomia człowieka. Podręcznik dla studentów i lekarzy, Poland: Elsevier Urban & Partner, 2003.
Teoria mechanizmów i manipulatorów
  • A Morecki
A. Morecki et al., Teoria mechanizmów i manipulatorów, Warsaw, Poland: Wydawnictwo Naukowo-Techniczne, 2002.