Available via license: CC BY 3.0
Content may be subject to copyright.
Selection of our books indexed in the Book Citation Index
in Web of Science™ Core Collection (BKCI)
Interested in publishing with us?
Contact book.department@intechopen.com
Numbers displayed above are based on latest data collected.
For more information visit www.intechopen.com
Open access books available
Countries delivered to Contributors from top 500 universities
International authors and editor s
Our authors are among the
most cited scientists
Downloads
We are IntechOpen,
the world’s leading publisher of
Open Access books
Built by scientists, for scientists
12.2%
117,000
130M
TOP 1%
154
4,300
Provisional chapter
Soybean Amino Acids in Health, Genetics, and
Evaluation
William Monte Singer, Bo Zhang,
M.A. Rouf Mian and Haibo Huang
Additional information is available at the end of the chapter
© 2016 The Author(s). Licensee InTech. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons
Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use,
distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
William MonteSinger, BoZhang, M.A. RoufMian
and HaiboHuang
Additional information is available at the end of the chapter
Abstract
Soybean is an important source of protein and amino acids for humans and livestock
because of its well-balanced amino acid prole. This chapter outlines the strengths and
weaknesses of soybean as a complete amino acid source as well as the relative importance
of individual amino acids. Special aention is paid to the sulfur-containing amino acids,
methionine and cysteine. Breeding and genetic engineering eorts are summarized to
highlight previous accomplishments in amino acid improvement and potential avenues
for future research. Agronomic properties and processing methods that aect amino
acid levels in soybean food and feed are also explained. A brief introduction into cur-
rent amino acid evaluation techniques is provided. By understanding the complexities
of amino acids in soybean, protein quality for humans and livestock can be maximized.
Keywords: essential and nonessential amino acids, soybean meal, methionine, cysteine,
sulfur-containing amino acids
1. Introduction
Soybean is one of the world’s most economically and nutritionally important crops. In 2018,
soybean were 61% of international oilseed production with 397.9 tons harvested worldwide
[1]. The United States and Brazil were the largest producers at 4545 and 4299 million bushels,
respectively, with China being the largest importer of U.S. whole soybeans valued over $3 bil-
lion U.S. [2, 3]. Soybean products, namely meal and oil, are popular in a myriad of industries
for their versatility and utility. Soybean oil provides the most versatility with uses in fuel,
solvents, candles, cosmetics, construction, and foam. However, soybean meal is the driving
© 2019 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use,
distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
factor for 70% of the plant’s value with 97% of all U.S. soybean meal being used for animal
feed [4]. As such, an enormous portion of soybean’s importance lies with its nutritional capa-
bilities for livestock and humans.
Nutritionally speaking, soybeans are a highly valued protein source. Proteins are a crucial
macromolecule needed in the diets of human and livestock. However, the true signicance of
soybean protein is due to its well-balanced amino acid prole that aligns with dietary needs
of humans and animals [5]. Amino acids are the functional subunits of proteins that, when
linked together in dierent orders, generate the variety of proteins critical to life. Amino acids
are also important intermediates for many biosynthesis pathways [6]. Deciencies in single
or multiple amino acids can negatively impact an individual’s growth and development [7,
8]. Intriguingly, an excess of certain amino acids has also been shown to worsen feed intake,
nitrogen eciency, and growth rate in livestock [9–11]. The importance of amino acid levels
on human health has also been well documented [12, 13].
Amino acids are characterized by having amine (−NH2) and carboxyl (−COOH) functional
groups as well as a “R-group” that is unique to each amino acid [14]. Amino acids are abun-
dant in both proteinogenic (protein-incorporated) and non-proteinogenic forms [15]. The 20
common, proteinogenic amino acids are generally the focus of research in soybeans as they
are the dening nutritive feature. Of those twenty, nine amino acids are essential for humans
to consume. Livestock usually require these same amino acids from feed and might require
others because of their biological systems [16]. Soybeans contain some level of all nine essential
amino acids which creates a suitable nutritional foundation for livestock feed and human food.
2. Essential amino acids
Essential amino acids are ones that living organisms are unable to biosynthesize themselves
and must obtain from their food source [7, 12, 16]. Therefore, in this term, “essential” refers to
the amino acid requirements in dietary ingredients. The nine standard essential amino acids
for humans present in soybean are: histidine, isoleucine, leucine, lysine, methionine, phenyl-
alanine, threonine, tryptophan, and valine [17]. Arginine is regularly considered an essential
amino acid for sh, poultry and sometimes swine due to absent or decient urea cycles [9,
16]. Poultry and reptiles also require dietary glycine because of diering waste excretion
pathways [16]. While crude protein content is normally recognized as the driving nutritional
factor for soybean meal, these essential amino acids provide true utility.
It has long been recommended that protein quality is based upon essential amino acid content.
However, for many reasons, animal feed and human food markets have only recently begun
assessing accordingly [5, 18, 19]. Equipment required for accurate amino acid measurement
and the diversity of markets for amino acids makes it dicult for supply chain evaluators like
elevator operators to appraise amino acid content on site. To some degree, the well-balanced
soybean amino acid prole also devalues the need to measure individual amino acid levels.
Since all essential amino acids are present, less aention is paid to decient amino acids such
as methionine and tryptophan [17, 20].
Soybean for Human Consumption and Animal Feed2
Deciencies in soybean’s essential amino acid prole has led to a large section of the livestock
industry focusing on feed mixing and supplementation. Rationing with other feed sources
such as cereal grain and synthetic amino acid augmentation can eectively resolve the issue.
Although, this comes with economic and environmental problems. Supplementing amino
acids adds costs to farmers. For example, the average cost for amino acids supplementation
for dairy farmers is 20 cents per head per day [21]. Maximizing crude protein for a growth
limiting factor also negatively impacts livestock nitrogen-use-eciency and environmental
nitrogen outputs [8, 22]. Synthetic amino acid production can produce hazardous environ-
mental waste and synthetic methionine, the most limiting soybean amino acid for poultry,
has also been banned for organic poultry production [20, 23]. Movement towards sustainable
agriculture will pressure the feed industry to alter how soybean meal is enhanced for essential
amino acid livestock maximization. Furthermore, the increasing popularity of meat-less diets
in humans will create new markets for soybean’s well-balanced amino acid prole.
3. Nonessential amino acids
Nonessential amino acids should not be misconstrued as unimportant amino acids. Of the 20
proteinogenic amino acids, those considered nonessential are still necessary for living organ-
isms. Healthy organisms are able to biosynthesize them and are not required from food and
feed consumption. The 20 standard nonessential amino acids for humans found in soybean
are: arginine, alanine, asparagine, aspartic acid, cysteine, glutamine, glutamic acid, glycine,
proline, serine, and tyrosine [24–26]. As previously mentioned, the necessity of amino acids
such as arginine and glycine can dier amongst species. Some nonessential amino acids are
also aected by the presence and amounts of essential amino acids.
Cysteine not provided from food consumption is directly biosynthesized from methionine
via trans-sulfuration [16, 27–30]. Consequently, if cysteine is not provided in the diet, then
enough methionine must be provided to compensate for both amino acid needs. For that
reason, feed research for poultry occasionally measures methionine and cysteine jointly [10,
31, 32]. Tyrosine is also directly formed from phenylalanine via hydroxylation [16, 29, 33].
Other amino acids like arginine, glycine, and proline can be required from the diet when
animals are young, old, sick, or otherwise decient in body protein regulation. As human
and livestock diets become more sustainably plant-based, it will become more important to
evaluate nonessential amino acids, specically the ones immediately aected by essential
amino acids.
4. Proteinogenic sulfur-containing amino acids
The two proteinogenic sulfur-containing amino acids, methionine and cysteine, are critical to
evaluating soybean meal as food and feed. While present in soybean, methionine and cysteine
levels are both inadequate for consumer needs [8, 20, 24]. Similar to research determinations,
the nutritional requirements for methionine and cysteine intake are often grouped together
Soybean Amino Acids in Health, Genetics, and Evaluation 3
as overall sulfur consumption from protein. Adult humans are recommended to intake 910–
1120 mg methionine and cysteine (based on body weight) per day [13]. For livestock, sulfur
amino acids recommendations can vary based on species, age, end-use, and diet formulation.
The importance of dietary sulfur amino acids for livestock is greatly emphasized in literature,
especially with soybean meal as base feed [8, 20, 34, 35].
Methionine and cysteine are vital to biological functions because of the sulfur contained in
their R-groups and versatility in macromolecule synthesis. Methionine is well-known for being
the typical initiating amino acid for protein synthesis and has hydrophobic properties when
incorporated into proteins [36]. These hydrophobic properties usually result in methionine
incorporation within the core of proteins. However, certain proteins have surface-exposed
methionine susceptible to oxidation that is associated with age-related disease [30, 37, 38].
S-adenosylmethionine, a methionine metabolism intermediate, is widely-used with functions
in methylation as well as amine, methylene, and sulfur atom donation [30, 39, 40]. Methionine
is especially important for poultry production as birds have exceedingly high sulfur amino
acid requirements, and low methionine levels can negatively aect growth rate, carcass yield,
fat content, and disease immunity [41–43]. Cysteine’s ability to form disulde bonds makes
it incredibly important to tertiary protein structure and can occur with and without enzyme
interactions [30, 44]. Cysteine is involved with keratin and feather production in poultry and
deciencies have been correlated to poor breast muscle development [45, 46]. Swine also need
higher amounts of cysteine as they age to compensate for body maintenance [29, 47].
5. Breeding eorts
Soybean has an extensive cultivated history dating back thousands of years to its country
of origin, China. Glycine max, the contemporary species of soybean, was domesticated from
the wild species Glycine soja and has been continually been improved through selective and
molecular breeding [48–50]. Once harvesting traits such as seed shaer and lodging were
improved in the late 1930s to make soybean a competitive row crop, other cultivar improve-
ments became a valuable research goal [49]. Current breeding programs tend to focus on traits
such as yield, disease resistance, abiotic stress tolerance, and seed composition. Seed compo-
sition improvements include protein and oil content, fay acid levels, anti-nutritional factors,
isoavones, and amino acids proles. Before 1972, there had been zero reported research
for improvement of soybean amino acid proles, rather with emphasis on overall protein
content [51]. Modern breeders are also inclined to concentrate eorts on protein content and
consider amino acid levels an afterthought [52]. TN04-5321 is the only released germplasm
in the United States that maintains yield and protein content while improving amino acid
balance by increasing methionine and cysteine to levels recommended livestock needs [53].
The major soybean storage proteins are 11S (glycinin) and 7S (conglycinin) and provide the
bulk of amino acids with limited non-proteinogenic amino acids in seed [54–56]. By increasing
11S and 7S quantity, more protein can ultimately be present in food and feed. Overemphasis on
crude protein content can have negative ramications on overall protein quality, specically
Soybean for Human Consumption and Animal Feed4
decient amino acids. While an increase in protein content would theoretically entail an
increase in amino acids including methionine and cysteine [57], the opposite eect has been
more notable [58, 59]. Molecular breeding techniques have recently improved the under-
standing of amino acid genomic regulation. Multiple quantitative trait loci (QTL) studies have
been performed to identify genomic regions that control amino acids levels in soybean seed
[60–64]. A myriad of QTL’s were found to create amino acid phenotypic variation. Individual
amino acids had reoccurring or proximal QTL’s discovered such as Sa 518 [60], ss107913002
[61], and BARC-048619 [62] for glycine and threonine. QTL’s for methionine and cysteine
were also discovered which could lead to valuable improvements for soybean livestock feed
[60–64]. Other genomic studies such as genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and genetic
diversity analyses would further improve genetic understanding.
6. Genetic engineering
Genetic engineering experiments such as genetically modied organisms (GMOs) and gene
editing are also promising avenues for improving amino acid proles of soybeans. Compared
to conventionally bred varieties, transgenic soybeans face additional adversity from registra-
tion requirements and public opinion. Transgenic eorts generally have one of three targets:
magnifying biosynthesis genes, adjusting biosynthesis regulation, and modifying storage
proteins. The earliest example would be a Brazil nut gene transfer in 1992. This successfully
increased protein content and methionine biosynthesis, however a major food allergen was
also transferred making commercialization impossible [65]. Expressing zein proteins from
corn has also been shown to increase sulfur-containing amino acids levels in soybean [66, 67].
Altering biosynthesis feedback regulation amplied both non-proteinogenic and proteogenic
lysine by circumventing normal enzymatic pathways [68]. Tryptophan in soybean also exhib-
ited increased non-proteinogenic levels when a feedback-insensitive enzyme was transferred
[25]. While soybean is not decient in lysine or tryptophan, corn is decient in both. By increas-
ing lysine and tryptophan concentrations, soybean becomes an even more useful feed additive
to corn rations. Even with limited research on modifying overall amino acids proles in soy-
beans, modifying 11S and 7S storage proteins ratios [69] or silencing their expression entirely
[70] has displayed increased amino acids levels. Similarly, a study using irradiated mutant soy-
beans lacking storage proteins as breeding parents demonstrated increased non-proteinogenic
amino acids contents [54]. In addition, further research should be conducted to determine the
bioavailability and digestibility of increased non-proteinogenic amino acids in soybean.
7. Agronomic relations
Amino acids concentrations in soybean are not only aected by their genetic potential.
Agronomic properties greatly impact the nal levels of amino acids. Agronomy encompasses
all aspects of crop production including environmental eects, climatic variables, and abiotic
factors. Perhaps the most considered agronomic factor is soil nutrient availability. Insucient
Soybean Amino Acids in Health, Genetics, and Evaluation 5
soil nutrient levels of nitrogen, potassium, phosphorous, sulfur, calcium, and magnesium
create poor amino acid proles in soybean plants [71]. Increased phosphorous rates have
been shown to increase the percentage of methionine and tryptophan in seed but had no
eect on protein content percentage [72]. Applications of sulfur, phosphorous, and nitrogen
(individual and combined) produced a variety of dierent methionine and cysteine seed con-
centrations [73]. Sulfur deciencies were also shown to inhibit the production of 11S proteins
while almost eliminating methionine and cysteine in 7S proteins [74]. It is becoming more
popular to also apply biological substances such as amino acids to plants through foliar and
seed application. Amino acid uptake by soybean and wheat have been proven, and improved
soybean growth rates and antioxidant eects have also occurred [75, 76]. Further research
should be conducted to determine if biofortication solutions are possible through amino
acid application.
Amino acid variation has also been shown to occur across environments [24, 59]. Specic
correlations have emerged in response to temperature, solar radiation, and rainfall. One
study shows that increased temperature leads to increased concentrations of all proteino-
genic amino acids [77], while another concludes that only methionine and cysteine increase
alongside temperature [78]. Increased solar radiation and greater available water appeared to
have a negative relationship with amino acid content [77]. These favorable conditions would
increase yield which has been shown to have a negative correlation with overall protein con-
tent [57]. The multitude of agronomic factors that aect amino acid proles in soybean make
it exceedingly important to compensate for variables when researching.
8. Processing impacts
The diversity in food, feed, and industrial used for soybean require the whole seed or seed
components to be processed. Processing can aect the nutritional value of soybean protein
and presence of amino acids in food and feed. Processing procedures can either separate seed
components for dierent purposes or convert the entire seed into a product (usually human
food). Some human soy foods such as edamame and soybean sprouts need lile to no process-
ing. Others including soymilk, tofu, nao, and soy sauce involve more processing. Soymilk
and tofu processing are interconnected. Soymilk is a water-extract of whole or crushed soy-
beans that is coagulated and pressed into tofu [48]. While not all seed proteins convert into
protein in tofu, 11S/7S storage protein ratios have been shown to be both positively and nega-
tively correlated with tofu hardness [79, 80]. Nao is a soy food created by fermenting whole
soybeans with Bacillus subtilis. Fermentation time aects nal amino acid concentrations, and
proper fermentation length could potentially increase nutritional values [81]. Soy sauce is
produced by traditional and commercial methods, but both are based around whole seed or
meal fermentation with Aspergillus sp. However, commercial methods have a lower amino
acid to nitrogen ratio [48].
Soybean meal processing also impacts the level of amino acids in livestock feed. The rst step
in soybean meal processing is essentially separating protein from oil. A variety of methods
Soybean for Human Consumption and Animal Feed6
exist including solvent extraction, screw pressing, and extruding [48, 82, 83]. All three pro-
cesses have three nal products: oil, meal (usually toasted to lessen anti-nutritional factors),
and hulls. Over processing of solvent extracted soymeal has been shown to decrease lysine,
cysteine, and arginine levels [84, 85]. Protein solubility and dispersibility measurements may
be a useful indicator of over processing [86, 87]. Soybean hulls are sometimes added to live-
stock feed for additional ber, however an increase in hull/meal ratios decrease the digest-
ibility of amino acids [88]. While soybean is renowned for its protein and amino acid content,
actual nutritional values can be decreased through certain processing methods.
9. Evaluation methods
All previously mentioned aspects of soybean production in regard to amino acid levels and
human and animal nutrition depend on a single common denominator: amino acid quanti-
cation. Amino acids must be reliably, eectively, and accurately identied, measured and
evaluated. A Google Scholar search of “amino acid analysis” will display over 1 million results.
Several reviews have been published regarding the development of amino acid analysis [89–91].
In general, contemporary analysis of amino acids from any source will be performed by chroma-
tography or near-infrared reectance spectroscopy. Chromatography is the common method
with specic techniques including ion exchange chromatography (IEC), high-performance
liquid chromatography (HPLC), and gas chromatography (GC). HPLC is the more validated
method for soybean amino acid analysis. It is more ecient than IEC, and it does not require the
transformation into volatiles like GC [91–94]. Near-infrared reectance spectroscopy (NIRS) is a
more recent addition to amino acid analysis, and it has the potential to drastically improve the
eciency in soybean feed evaluation [19]. The inability to actually measure amino acid levels is
main hindrance for NIRS amino acid analysis. NIRS methods must be developed from a calibra-
tion set of raw data (often from HPLC) [95–97]. Nonetheless, eciency improvements should
persuade researchers to continually explore future NIRS amino acid analysis applications.
10. Conclusion
Soybean is a valuable source of protein and amino acids for humans and livestock. Soybean’s
well-balanced amino acid prole provides all essential amino acids as well as most nones-
sential. However, there is much room for nutritional improvement. Proteinogenic sulfur-
containing amino acids, methionine and cysteine, are decient in soybean and are especially
needed in livestock rations. Increased levels of these amino acids would augment soybean
meal value and lessen the need for synthetic amino acid supplements. Breeding eorts have
made lile progress in adjusting amino acid proles thus far, however signicant develop-
ments in understanding genomic control regions promise future success. Genetic engineering
eorts have shown promising amino acid improvements, but regulations and public opinion
made commercialization dicult. New gene-editing technology could be the key to unlock-
ing true nutritional improvement.
Soybean Amino Acids in Health, Genetics, and Evaluation 7
Agronomic properties and processing methods both impact the nal quantities of amino acids
available to humans and livestock. Understanding these impacts are essential to improve the
nutritional quality of soybeans. Amino acid evaluation through HPLC provides reliable and
ecient quantication, yet even quicker measurements are possible through NIRS. As the
world’s population continues to grow, soybeans will be essential to both human and livestock
for amino acid requirements. Wholesome approaches that understand the complexities of
amino acids in soybean will be required to maximize overall success and feed the world with
balance soy proteins.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University’s
Open Access Subvention Fund for funding the publishing fee.
Conict of interest
The authors declare there is no conict of interest.
Author details
William Monte Singer1*, Bo Zhang1, M.A. Rouf Mian2 and Haibo Huang3
*Address all correspondence to: wilmsing@vt.edu
1 School of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic and State Institution,
Blacksburg, Virginia, USA
2 United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Raleigh,
North Carolina
3 Department of Food Science and Technology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State
University, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA
References
[1] International: World Oilseed Production. 2019. Available from: hp://soystats.com/
international-world-oilseed-production/
[2] International: World Soybean Production. 2019. Available from: hp://soystats.com/
international-world-soybean-production/
Soybean for Human Consumption and Animal Feed8
[3] U.S. Exports: Soy Exports by Customer. 2019. Available from: hp://soystats.com/u-s-
exports-soy-exports-by-customersda/
[4] Soybean Meal. United Soybean Board. 2019. Available from: hps://unitedsoybean.org/
topics/soybean-meal/
[5] Osborne TB, Mendel LB. Amino-acids in nutrition and growth. 1914. Journal of the
American College of Nutrition. 1993;12(5):484-485
[6] Herrmann K, Somerville RL. Amino Acids: Biosynthesis and Genetic Regulation.
Reading, Massachuses: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc; 1983
[7] Wade C. Carlson Wade’s Amino Acids Book. New Canaan, Connecticut: Keats Publishing
Inc.; 1985
[8] Berry TH, Becker DE, Rasmussen OG, Jensen AH, Norton HW. The limiting amino acids
in soybean protein. Journal of Animal Science. 1962;21(3):558-561
[9] Boisen S, Hvelplund T, Weisbjerg MR. Ideal amino acid proles as a basis for feed pro-
tein evaluation. Livestock Production Science. 2000;64(2):239-251
[10] Han Y, Suzuki H, Parsons CM, Baker DH. Amino acid fortication of a low-protein corn
and soybean meal diet for chicks. Poultry Science. 1992;71(7):1168-1178
[11] Waldroup PW, Mitchell RJ, Payne JR, Hazen KR. Performance of chicks fed diets
formulated to minimize excess levels of essential amino acids. Poultry Science.
1976;55(1):243-253
[12] D’Mello JPF, editor. Amino Acids in Human Nutrition and Health. Wallingford, United
Kingdom: CAB International; 2012
[13] Jez JM, Fukagawa NK. Plant sulphur compounds and human health. In: Sulfur: A
Missing Link between Soils, Crops, and Nutrition. American Society of Agronomy, Crop
Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America; 2008. pp. 281-291
[14] Weaver R. Molecular Biology. 4th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2008
[15] Wagner I, Musso H. New naturally occurring amino acids. Angewandte Chemie
(International Ed. in English). 1983;22(11):816-828
[16] Buery PJ, D’Mello JPF. Amino acid metabolism in farm animals: An overview. In: Amino
Acids in Farm Animal Nutrition. Wallingford, United Kingdom: CAB International;
1994. pp. 1-10
[17] Kuiken KA, Lyman M. Essential amino acid composition of soy bean meals prepared
from twenty strains of soy beans. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1949;177:29-36
[18] Pfarr MD, Kazula MJ, Miller-Garvin JE, Naeve SL. Amino acid balance is aected by
protein concentration in soybean. Crop Science. 2018;58(5):2050-2062
[19] Measuring Beyond the Bushel. United Soybean Board. 2019. Available from: hps://unit-
edsoybean.org/article/measuring-beyond-the-bushel-1/
Soybean Amino Acids in Health, Genetics, and Evaluation 9
[20] Fernandez SR, Aoyagi S, Han Y, Parsons CM, Baker DH. Limiting order of amino acids
in corn and soybean meal for growth of the chick. Poultry Science. 1994;73(12):1887-1896
[21] Control Feed Costs with Amino Acids. Drovers. 2019. Available from: hps://www.
drovers.com/article/control-feed-costs-amino-acids
[22] Managing Nutrients and Pathogens from Animal Agriculture. Natural Resource,
Agriculture, and Engineering Service. Ithaca, NY; 2000
[23] Willke T. Methionine production—A critical review. Applied Microbiology and
Biotechnology. 2014;98(24):9893-9914
[24] Goldus F, Ceccantini M, Santos W. Amino acid content of soybean samples collected
in dierent Brazilian states: Harvest 2003/2004. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science.
2006;8(2):105-111
[25] Kita Y, Nakamoto Y, Takahashi M, Kitamura K, Wakasa K, Ishimoto M. Manipulation of
amino acid composition in soybean seeds by the combination of deregulated tryptophan
biosynthesis and storage protein deciency. Plant Cell Reports. 2010;29(1):87-95
[26] Rackis JJ, Anderson RL, Sasame HA, Smith AK, VanEen CH. Soybean amino acids,
amino acids in soybean hulls and oil meal fractions. Journal of Agricultural and Food
Chemistry. 1961;9(5):409-412
[27] Mato JM, Martinez-Chantar ML, Lu SC. Methionine metabolism. In: Amino Acids in
Human Nutrition and Health. Wallingford, United Kingdom: CAB International; 2012.
pp. 173-188
[28] Kredich NM. Regulation of cysteine biosynthesis in Escherichia coli and Salmonella
typhimurium. In: Amino Acids: Biosynthesis and Genetic Regulation. Reading,
Massachuses: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc; 1983. pp. 115-132
[29] Fuller MF. Amino acid requirements for maintenance, body protein accretion and
reproduction in pigs. In: Amino Acids in Farm Animal Nutrition. Wallingford, United
Kingdom: CAB International; 1994. pp. 155-184
[30] Brosnan JT, Brosnan ME. The sulfur-containing amino acids: An overview. The Journal
of Nutrition. 2006;136(6):1636S-1640S
[31] Jankowski J, Kubińska M, Zduńczyk Z. Nutritional and immunomodulatory function
of methionine in poultry diets—A review. Annals of Animal Science. 2014;14(1):17-32
[32] D’Mello JPF. Responses of growing poultry to amino acids. In: Amino Acids in Farm
Animal Nutrition. Wallingford, United Kingdom: CAB International; 1994. pp. 205-244
[33] Herrmann K. The common aromatic biosynthetic pathway. In: Amino Acids: Biosynthesis
and Genetic Regulation. Reading, Massachuses: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company,
Inc; 1983
[34] Allee GL, Kerley MS. Modications in soybean seed composition to enhance animal feed
use and value: Moving from a dietary ingredient to a functional dietary component.
Soybean for Human Consumption and Animal Feed10
Journal of Agrobiotechnology Management & Economics. 2003. Vol 6. Number 1 & 2.
Article 5. Available from: hp://agbioforum.org/v6n12/v6n12a05-kerley.htm
[35] Wu G. Dietary requirements of synthesizable amino acids by animals: A paradigm shift
in protein nutrition. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology. 2014;5(1):34
[36] Ingenbleek Y, Kimura H. Nutritional essentiality of sulfur in health and disease.
Nutrition Reviews. 2013;71(7):413-432
[37] Levine RL, Mosoni L, Berle BS, Stadtman ER. Methionine residues as endogenous anti-
oxidants in proteins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United
States of America. 1996;93(26):15036-15040
[38] Moskovi J. Methionine sulfoxide reductases: Ubiquitous enzymes involved in anti-
oxidant defense, protein regulation, and prevention of aging-associated diseases.
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 2005;1703(2):213-219
[39] Catoni GL. S-Adenosylmethionine—A new intermediate formed enzymatically from
L-methionine and adenosinetriphosphate. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1953;204(1):
403-416
[40] Fontecave M, Aa M, Mulliez E. S-adenosylmethionine: Nothing goes to waste. Trends
in Biochemical Sciences. 2004;29(5):243-249
[41] Bunchasak C. Role of dietary methionine in poultry production. The Journal of Poultry
Science. 2009;46(3):169-179
[42] Conde-Aguilera JA, Cobo-Ortega C, Tesseraud S, Lessire M, Mercier Y, van Milgen J.
Changes in body composition in broilers by a sulfur amino acid deciency during
growth. Poultry Science. 2013;92(5):1266-1275
[43] Wu B, Cui H, Peng X, Fang J, Cui W, Liu X. Eect of methionine deciency on the thymus
and the subsets and proliferation of peripheral blood T-cell, and serum IL-2 contents in
broilers. Journal of Integrative Agriculture. 2012;11(6):1009-1019
[44] Jessop CE, Chakravarthi S, Watkins RH, Bulleid NJ. Oxidative protein folding in the
mammalian endoplasmic reticulum. Biochemical Society Transactions. 2004;32(Pt
5:655-658
[45] Wylie LM, Robertson GW, Macleod MG, Hocking PM. Eects of ambient temperature
and restricted feeding on the growth of feathers in growing turkeys. British Poultry
Science. 2001;42(4):449-455
[46] Bonato MA, Sakomura NK, Siqueira JC, Fernandes JBK, Gous RM. Maintenance require-
ments for methionine and cysteine, and threonine for poultry. South African Journal of
Animal Science. 2011;41(3):209-222-222
[47] Lewis AJ. Methionine-cysteine relationships in pig nutrition. In: Absorption and
Utilization of Amino Acids. Wallingford, United Kingdom: CAB International; 2003.
pp. 143-156
Soybean Amino Acids in Health, Genetics, and Evaluation 11
[48] Liu K. Soybeans: Chemistry, Technology, and Utilization. New York, NY: Chapman &
Hall; 1997
[49] Sleper DA, Poehlman JM. Breeding Field Crops. 5th ed. Ames, Iowa: Blackwell
Publishing Professional; 2006
[50] Hermann FJ. A Revision of the Genus Glycine and its Immediate Allies. Washington,
D.C: U.S. Department of Agriculture; 1962. 84 p
[51] Howell RW, Brim CA, Rinne RW. The plant geneticist’s contribution toward changing
lipid and amino acid composition of soybeans. Journal of the American Oil Chemists'
Society. 1972;49(1):30-32
[52] Mahmoud AA, Natarajan SS, Benne JO, Mawhinney TP, Wiebold WJ, Krishnan
HB. Eect of six decades of selective breeding on soybean protein composition and qual-
ity: A biochemical and molecular analysis. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry.
2006;54(11):3916-3922
[53] Panthee D, Pantalone VR. Registration of soybean germplasm lines TN03-350 and TN04-
5321 with improved protein concentration and quality. Crop Science. 2006;46:2328-2329
[54] Takahashi M, Uematsu Y, Kashiwaba K, Yagasaki K, Hajika M, Matsunaga R, et al.
Accumulation of high levels of free amino acids in soybean seeds through integration of
mutations conferring seed protein deciency. Planta. 2003;217(4):577-586
[55] Meinke DW, Chen J, Beachy RN. Expression of storage-protein genes during soybean
seed development. Planta. 1981;153:130-139
[56] Wolf WJ. Soybean protein nomenclature: A progress report. Cereal Science Today.
Number 3. 1969;14:75-129. Available from: hps://pubag.nal.usda.gov/catalog/31396
[57] Wilcox JR, Shibles RM. Interrelationships among seed quality aributes in soybean.
Crop Science. 2001;41(1):11-14
[58] Paek NC, Imsande J, Shoemaker RC, Shibles R. Nutritional control of soybean seed stor-
age protein. Crop Science. 1997;37(2):498-503
[59] Thakur M, Hurburgh CR. Quality of US soybean meal compared to the quality of
soybean meal from other origins. Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society.
2007;84(9):835-843
[60] Panthee DR, Pantalone VR, Saxton AM, West DR, Sams CE. Genomic regions associated
with amino acid composition in soybean. Molecular Breeding. 2006;17:79-89
[61] Fallen B, Hatcher C, Allen F, Kopsell D, Saxton A, Chen P, et al. Soybean seed amino
acid content QTL detected using the universal soy linkage panel 1.0 with 1,536 SNPs.
Journal of Plant Genome Sciences. 2013;1(3):68-79. Agronomy and Horticulture—Faculty
Publications. Available from: hps://digitalcommons.unl.edu/agronomyfacpub/807
Soybean for Human Consumption and Animal Feed12
[62] Warrington CV, Abdel-Haleem H, Hyten DL, Cregan PB, Orf JH, Killam AS, et al. QTL
for seed protein and amino acids in the Benning × Danbaekkong soybean population.
Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 2015;128(5):839-850
[63] Li X, Tian R, Kamala S, Du H, Li W, Kong Y, et al. Identication and verication of pleiotropic
QTL controlling multiple amino acid contents in soybean seed. Euphytica. 2018;214(6):93
[64] Panthee DR, Pantalone VR, Sams CE, Saxton AM, West DR, Orf JH, et al. Quantitative
trait loci controlling sulfur containing amino acids, methionine and cysteine, in soybean
seeds. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 2006;112(3):546-553
[65] Townsend JA, Thomas LA, Kulisek ES, Daywalt MJ, Winter KRK, Altenbach AB.
Improving the quality of seed proteins in soybean. In: Proceedings of the 4th Biennial
Conference on Molecular and Cellular Biology of Soybean. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State
University; 1992. p. 4
[66] Kerr P. Utilization and Quality of Identity Preserved Oilseed Co-Products. Presentation,
Institute of Food Technologists; Symposium. New Orleans, LA; 1996
[67] Kim W-S, Krishnan HB. Impact of co-expression of maize 11 and 18 kDa δ-zeins and
27 kDa γ-zein in transgenic soybeans on protein body structure and sulfur amino acid
content. Plant Science. 2019;280:340-347
[68] Falco SC, Guida T, Locke M, Mauvais J, Sanders C, Ward RT, et al. Transgenic canola and
soybean seeds with increased lysine. Bio/Technology. 1995;13(6):577
[69] El-Shemy H, Khalafalla M, Fujita K, Ishimoto M. Improvement of protein quality in
transgenic soybean plants. Biologia Plantarum. 2007;51:277-284
[70] Schmidt MA, Barbazuk WB, Sandford M, May G, Song Z, Zhou W, et al. Silencing of soy-
bean seed storage proteins results in a rebalanced protein composition preserving seed
protein content without major collateral changes in the metabolome and transcriptome.
Plant Physiology. 2011;156(1):330-345
[71] Haghiri F. Inuence of macronutrient elements on the amino aicd composition of
Soybean plants. Agronomy Journal. 1966;58:609-612
[72] Kapoora AC, Gupta YP. Changes in proteins and amino acids in developing soybean
seed and eect of phosphorus nutrition. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture.
1977;28(2):113-120
[73] Arora SK, Luthra YP. Relationship between sulphur content of leaf with methionine,
cysteine and cysteine contents in the seeds of Phaseolus aureus L. As aected by S, P, and
N application. Plant and Soil. 1971;34(1):91-96
[74] Gayler KR, Sykes GE. Eects of nutritional stress on the storage proteins of soybeans.
Plant Physiology. 1985;78(3):582-585
Soybean Amino Acids in Health, Genetics, and Evaluation 13
[75] Giose E, de Neergaard A, Schjoerring JK. Interactions between uptake of amino acids
and inorganic nitrogen in wheat plants. Biogeosciences. 2012;9(4):1509-1518
[76] Teixeira WF, Fagan EB, Soares LH, Umburanas RC, Reichardt K, Neto DD. Foliar and
seed application of amino acids aects the antioxidant metabolism of the Soybean
crop. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2017;8. Available from: hps://www.frontiersin.org/
articles/10.3389/fpls.2017.00327/full
[77] Carrera CS, Reynoso CM, Funes GJ, Martínez MJ, Dardanelli J, Resnik SL. Amino acid
composition of soybean seeds as aected by climatic variables. Brazilian Agricultural
Research. 2011;46(12):1579-1587
[78] Wolf RB, Cavins JF, Kleiman R, Black LT. Eect of temperature on soybean seed constitu-
ents: Oil, protein, moisture, fay acids, amino acids and sugars. Journal of the American
Oil Chemists’ Society. 1982;59(5):230-232
[79] Cai T, Chang K-C. Processing eect on soybean storage proteins and their relationship
with tofu quality. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 1999;47(2):720-727
[80] Mujoo R, Trinh DT, Ng PKW. Characterization of storage proteins in dierent soy-
bean varieties and their relationship to tofu yield and texture. Food Chemistry.
2003;82(2):265-273
[81] Weng TM, Chen MT. Changes of protein in Nao (a fermented soybean food) aected by
fermenting time. Food Science and Technology Research. 2010;16(6):537-542
[82] Lusas EW. Soybean processing and utilization. In: Soybeans: Improvement, Production,
and Uses. 3rd ed. Madison, WI: ASA, CSSA, SSSA; 2004. pp. 949-1036
[83] Johnson L, Smith K. Soybean Processing. United Soybean Board. Soybean Meal INFO
Center. Fact Sheet; 2019. 7 pages. Available from: hps://www.soymeal.org/wp-content/
uploads/2018/04/soybean_processing.pdf
[84] Parsons CM, Hashimoto K, Wedekind KJ, Han Y, Baker DH. Eect of overprocess-
ing on availability of amino acids and energy in soybean meal. Poultry Science.
1992;71(1):133-140
[85] Taira H. Studies on amino acid contents of processed soybean: Part X. the inuence of
added sugars on the heat destruction of the basic and sulphur containing amino acids in
soybean products. Agricultural and Biological Chemistry. 1966;30(9):847-855
[86] Araba M, Dale NM. Evaluation of protein solubility as an indicator of overprocessing
soybean meal. Poultry Science. 1990;69(1):76-83
[87] Batal AB, Douglas MW, Engram AE, Parsons CM. Protein dispersibility index as an
indicator of adequately processed soybean meal. Poultry Science. 2000;79(11):1592-1596
[88] Dilger RN, Sands JS, Ragland D, Adeola O. Digestibility of nitrogen and amino acids in
soybean meal with added soyhulls. Journal of Animal Science. 2004;82(3):715-724
Soybean for Human Consumption and Animal Feed14
[89] Husek P, Simek P. Advances in amino acid analysis. Analytical and Bioanalytical
Chemistry. 2001;19(9):986-999
[90] Tristram GR, Raenbury JM. The development of amino acid analysis. In: Amino Acid
Analysis. Chichester, UK: Ellis Horwood; 1981. pp. 16-36
[91] Williams AP. Recent developments in amino acid analysis. In: Amino Acids in Farm
Animal Nutrition. Wallingford, United Kingdom: CAB International; 1994. pp. 11-36
[92] Jajić I, Krstović S, Glamočić D, Jakšić SM, Abramović BF. Validation of an HPLC method
for the determination of amino acids in feed. Journal of the Serbian Chemical Society.
2013;78(6):839-850
[93] Oomah BD, Voldeng H, Fregeau-Reid JA. Characterization of soybean proteins by
HPLC. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition. 1994;45:251-263
[94] Malmer MF, Schroeder LA. Amino acid analysis by high-performance liquid chroma-
tography with methanesulfonic acid hydrolysis and 9-uorenylmethylchloroformate
derivatization. Journal of Chromatography. A. 1990;514:227-239
[95] Baianu I, Prisecaru V. Novel NIR spectroscopy correlation approach to amino acid anal-
ysis of soybean proteins for composition improvements. Nature Precedings. University
of Illinois at Urbana. 2011. Available from: hp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/npre.2011.6231.1
[96] Kovalenko IV, Rippke GR, Hurburgh CR. Determination of amino acid composition of
soybeans (Glycine max) by near-infrared spectroscopy. Journal of Agricultural and Food
Chemistry. 2006;54(10):3485-3491
[97] Pazdernik DL, Killam AS, Orf JH. Analysis of amino and fay acid composition in soy-
bean seed, using near infrared refelctance spectroscopy. Agronomy Journal;89:679-685
Soybean Amino Acids in Health, Genetics, and Evaluation 15