Content uploaded by Turaj Azizzadeh
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Turaj Azizzadeh on Oct 16, 2019
Content may be subject to copyright.
riahi@iust.ac.ir
-
˓ ˓
˓
˓
[1]
˓
˓
˓
(SHM) ral health monitoringstructu
1
[2]˓
[3]
˓
[4]
˓
[5]˓
˓
˓˓
2.6
[6]
˓
˓
˓
[7]
Circuit Television (CCTV)-Closed
2
ground penetrating radar (GPR)
3
[8]
˓
˓
.
:
˓
[9]
˓
˓
-
˓
[10][11] ˓دودح
˓
˓[12]
˓ ˓
˓ ˓˓
... و
˓
˓[13]
.˓
˓
[14]
[15]
[16]
˓
˓˓ ˓
˓
˓
˓
˓[17]˓
˓
˓
˓ ˓
[18][19]
(EC)˓
(EMT)(UT)-
(AE)˓
(IE)˓
[20]
˓
˓
˓
˓
˓
˓
˓
˓
˓
[21][22]
˓
˓
wheeled robots
4
Inchworm robots
5
Snake robots
6
Legged robots
7
explorer
8
[23]
˓
-
˓-
Mogre [24]
[25]MRINSPECT
[26]
˓
MRINSPECT I
MRINSPECT IIMRINSPECT IV [26]
-
[27]
[27]
[28]
˓
˓
˓
[29]
˓
[30]
˓[31][32]-
˓
[33]
[34]
-
˓˓ ˓ ˓
˓˓
˓
[35]
[15]
˓
˓
˓
[14]
[36]-
[5]
˓
-
˓
˓-
˓
[38]-[37]
˓
[39]
˓
˓
˓-
˓
˓
[40]
˓
[41]
˓
[37][38]
˓ CCD
˓
[39]
˓
˓
˓
Optical triangulation
9
[39]
˓
[41]karo
[42]˓
˓
˓
˓
˓
˓
˓
˓
˓
˓
˓[42]
Karo
karo
KARO[43]
karo
˓
(PIRAT) time Assessment Technique-Pipe Inspection Real
10
˓
˓
˓
[43]
PIRAT˓
PIRAT
-
˓
[44]
˓
PIRAT[44]
SSET
SSET˓
SSET[15]
˓tiscit
˓
SEK
SEK
˓
[45]SEK
SEK
˓˓ و
˓ SEK
(SSET) Sewer Scanner and Evaluation Technology
11
guided swimming system-cable
12
(SAM) sensors-Sewer Assessment by Multi
13
˓
SEK˓
SEK
SVM
SEK-
˓SVM
و
SVM ˓
-
SEKSVM[45]
˓
˓
SAM
SAM
[46]
˓
˓˓˓
˓
˓
˓ ˓
˓
˓
10
[1] Lynch, J. P., Loh, K. J. (2006). A summary review
of wireless sensors and sensor networks for structural
health monitoring. Shock and Vibration Digest. 38(2), 91-
130.
[2] Doebling, S. W., Farrar, C. R., Prime, M. B.
(1998). A summary review of vibration-based damage
identification methods. Shock and vibration digest. 30(2),
91-105.
[3] Worden, K., Farrar, C. R., Manson, G., Park, G.
(2007). The fundamental axioms of structural health
monitoring. In: Proceedings of the Royal Society of
London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering
Sciences (Vol. 463, No. 2082, pp. 1639-1664). The Royal
Society.
[4] Iyengar, S. S., Boroojeni, K. G., Balakrishnan, N.
(2014). Mathematical Theories of Distributed Sensor
Networks. Springer.
[5] Pace, N. G. (1994). Ultrasonic surveying of fully
charged sewage pipes. Electronics & communication
engineering journal, 6(2), 87-92.
[6] US Environmental Protection Agency, Addressing
the challenge through innovation, 2007. URL
http://www.epa.gov/nrmrl/pubs/600f07015/600f07015.pd
f.
[7] Sewer collapse closes chateau street on north side,
2009. URL http://www.post-
gazette.com/pg/09134/970143-100.stm.
[8] URL http: / / latimesblogs.latimes.com/
lanow/2009/09/coldwatercanyon- could-be-closed- for-3-
days-due-to-destructivewater-main-break.html.
[9] Misiūnas, D. (2008). Failure monitoring and asset
condition asssessment in water supply systems. Vilniaus
Gedimino technikos universitetas.
[10] Gokhale, S. R., Abraham, D. M., Iseley, T. (1997).
Intelligent sewer condition–Evaluation technologies. An
analysis of three promising options. In North American
No-Dig 1997 Conf. (pp. 253-265).
[11] Rome, E., Hertzberg, J., Kirchner, F., Licht, U.,
Christaller, T. (1999). Towards autonomous sewer robots:
the MAKRO project. Urban Water, 1(1), 57-70.
[12] Schilling, K., Roth, H. (1999). Navigation and
Control for Pipe Inspection and Repair Robots. IFAC
Proceedings Volumes, 32(2), 8446-8449.
[13] Wirahadikusumah, R., Abraham, D. M., Iseley, T.,
Prasanth, R. K. (1998). Assessment technologies for sewer
system rehabilitation. Automation in Construction, 7(4),
259-270.
[14] Read, G. F., Vickridge, I. (1997). Sewers:
Rehabilitation and New Construction: Repair and
Renovation, Butterworth-Heinemann, London, UK.
[15] Sewer Scanner and Evaluation Technology. URL
www.new-technologies.org.
[16] Kleiner, Y., Adams, B. J., Rogers, J. S. (2001).
Water distribution network renewal planning. Journal of
Computing in Civil Engineering, 15(1), 15-26.
[17] Pace, N. G. (1994). Ultrasonic surveying of fully
charged sewage pipes. Electronics & communication
engineering journal, 6(2), 87-92.
[18] Adams, D. (2007). Health monitoring of structural
materials and components: methods with applications.
John Wiley & Sons.
[19] Bray D.E. (1997). Nondestructive Evaluation. A
Tool in Design,Manufacturing, and Service. CRC Press,
Boca Raton, Fla, USA.
[20] Trenchless Technology Network, Underground
Mapping,Pipeline Location Technology and Condition
Assessment, Infrastructure Engineering and Management
Research Centre, The University of Birmingham, (2002).
[21] Ong, J. K., Kerr, D., Bouazza-Marouf, K. (2003).
Design of a semi-autonomous modular robotic vehicle for
gas pipeline inspection. Proceedings of the Institution of
Mechanical Engineers, Part I: Journal of Systems and
Control Engineering, 217(2), 109-122.
[22] Kuntze, H. B., Haffner, H. (1998, May).
Experiences with the development of a robot for smart
multisensoric pipe inspection. In Robotics and
Automation, 1998. Proceedings. 1998 IEEE International
Conference on (Vol. 2, pp. 1773-1778). IEEE.
[23] Tâche, F., Fischer, W., Moser, R., Mondada, F.,
Siegwart, R. (2007). Adapted magnetic wheel unit for
compact robots inspecting complex shaped pipe
structures. In advanced intelligent mechatronics, 2007
IEEE/ASME international conference on (No. LSRO-
CONF-2007-013, pp. 1-6). IEEE Press.
[24] Fujiwara, S., Kanehara, R., Okada, T., Sanemori,
T. (1993). An articulated multi-vehicle robot for
inspection and testing of pipeline interiors. In Intelligent
Robots and Systems' 93, IROS'93. Proceedings of the 1993
IEEE/RSJ International Conference on (Vol. 1, pp. 509-
516). IEEE.
[25] Li, P., Ma, S., Li, B., Wang, Y. (2008). Design of
a mobile mechanism possessing driving ability and
detecting function for in-pipe inspection. In Robotics and
Automation, 2008. ICRA 2008. IEEE International
Conference on (pp. 3992-3997). IEEE.
[26] Roh, S. G., Lee, J. S., Moon, H., & Choi, H. R.
(2009). In-pipe robot based on selective drive
mechanism. International Journal of Control, Automation
and Systems, 7(1), 105-112.
[27] Schempf, H., Mutschler, E., Gavaert, A.,
Skoptsov, G., Crowley, W. (2010). Visual and
nondestructive evaluation inspection of live gas mains
using the Explorer™ family of pipe robots. Journal of
Field Robotics, 27(3), 217-249.
[28] Wang, Z., Gu, H. (2008). A bristle-based pipeline
robot for ill-constraint pipes. IEEE/ASME Transactions on
Mechatronics, 13(3), 383-392.
[29] Aracil, R., Saltarén, R., Reinoso, O. (2003).
Parallel robots for autonomous climbing along tubular
structures. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42(2), 125-
134.
[30] Bekhit, A., Dehghani, A., Richardson, R. (2012).
Kinematic analysis and locomotion strategy of a pipe
inspection robot concept for operation in active
pipelines. International Journal of Mechanical
Engineering and Mechatronics, 1929, 2724.
[31] Neubauer, W. (1994). A spider-like robot that
climbs vertically in ducts or pipes. In Intelligent Robots
and Systems' 94.'Advanced Robotic Systems and the Real
World', IROS'94. Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ/GI
International Conference on (Vol. 2, pp. 1178-1185).
IEEE.
[32] Zagler, A., Pfeiffer, F. (2003). "MORITZ" a pipe
crawler for tube junctions. In Robotics and Automation,
2003. Proceedings. ICRA'03. IEEE International
Conference on (Vol. 3, pp. 2954-2959). IEEE.
[33] Wright, C., Johnson, A., Peck, A., McCord, Z.,
Naaktgeboren, A., Gianfortoni, P., Choset, H. (2007).
Design of a modular snake robot. In Intelligent Robots and
Systems, 2007. IROS 2007. IEEE/RSJ International
Conference on (pp. 2609-2614). IEEE.
[34] Water Environment Research Foundation, 2009.
URL http: //www.werf.org /AM/ CustomSource/
Downloads/ uGet-ExecutiveSummary.cfm?FILE=ES-01-
CTS- 7.pdf&Content-FileID=1960.
[35] Sarshar, N., Halfawy, M. R., Hengmeechai, J.
(2009). Video processing techniques for assisted CCTV
inspection and condition rating of sewers. Journal of
Water Management Modeling, 129-147.
[36] Morici, P. (1997). Small cameras: diagnosing
sewer laterals quickly and easily. Trenchless
Technol., 6(10), 40-45.
[37] Roberts, R. (1999). Laser profilometry as an
inspection method for reformer catalyst tubes. Journal of
Nondestructive Testing & Ultrasonic (Germany), 4(2).
[38] Applications of laser profilometry for boiler tube
inspection, vol.3, no. 7, July 1998.
[39] Zhuang, B. H., Zhang, W., Cui, D. Y. (1998).
Noncontact laser sensor for pipe inner wall
inspection. Optical Engineering, 37(5), 1643-1648.
[40] Thames Water/OMC Pipe Profiling Tool. URL
http://www.optical-metrology-
centre.com/gallery_sewer_profiling.htm.
[41] Hartrumpf, M., Munser, R. (1997). Optical three-
dimensional measurements by radially symmetric
structured light projection. Applied Optics, 36(13), 2923-
2928.
[42] Doyle, J. (1999). The expanding use of lasers in
nondestructive testing. Materials evaluation, 57(4), 426-
430.
[43] Kuntze, H. B., Schmidt, D., Haffner, H., Loh, M.
(1995). KARO-A flexible robot for smart sensor-based
sewer inspection. In Proc. Int. Conf. No Dig'95, Dresden,
Germany, 19 (pp. 367-374).
[44] CSIRO annual report, 1994–95.
[45] Teichgräber, B., Stemplewski, J., Althoff, H.,
Elkmann, N. (2006). Remote controlled inspection device
for large sewers. Water Practice and Technology, 1(4),
wpt2006080.
[46] Eiswirth, M., Frey, C., Herbst, J., Jacubasch, A.,
Held, I., Heske, C., Wolf, L. (2001). Sewer assessment by
multi-sensor systems. In: Proceedings of the 2nd World
Water Congress of the International Water Association.
A Review on Inspection Methods of Sewer Pipelines
2*
, Mohammad Riahi
1
Turaj Azizzadeh
1- Ph.D Student, School of Mechanical Engineering, Iran University of Science and technology, Tehran 2- Professor, School of Mechanical Engineering, Iran University of Science and technology, Tehran *riahi@iust.ac.ir
Abstract:
Pipelines are widely used in transporting large quantities of water and sewage over long distances.
These valuable infrastructures attract public attention only when they fail. The quantitative and early
detection of defects in sewer pipelines is very important in order to avoid severe consequences. In many
countries, sewer pipeline inspection is usually carried out using CCTV (Closed-Circuit TV) cameras
and off-line human surveys through raw image assessment for failure identification. CCTV-based
techniques have some limitations that restrict their implementation. One of the disadvantages of CCTV-
based techniques is the lack of visibility in the interior of the pipes. The other disadvantage of CCTV-
based techniques is the poor quality of the obtained images because of difficult lighting conditions. In
consequence, CCTV-based techniques can only detect gross defects reliably. In recent decades,
thermography, microwave, laser, and sonar-based techniques have been proposed to complement the
conventional CCTV-based technique and to improve inspection results. Also, new inspection devices
employing multiple sensors and being capable of carrying out remote sewer inspection tasks have been
proposed. This paper presents an overview of the conventional and novel inspection technologies for
sewer pipelines. Furthermore, different types of robots for in pipe inspection tasks are discussed.
Keywords: Sewer pipelines, CCTV-based inspection technique, Multi-sensor inspection technique,
Pipe inspection robots