PresentationPDF Available

Is Weather Chaotic? Coexistence of Chaos and Order within a Generalized Lorenz Model

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

The pioneering study of Lorenz in 1963 and a follow-up presentation in 1972 changed our view on the predictability of weather by revealing the so-called butterfly effect, also known as chaos. Over 50 years since Lorenz's 1963 study, the statement of "weather is chaotic" has been well accepted. Such a view turns our attention from regularity associated with Laplace's view of determinism to irregularity associated with chaos. Stated alternatively, while Lorenz (1993) documented that "as with Poincare and Birkhoff, everything centers around periodic solutions," he himself and chaos advocates focused on the existence of non-periodic solutions and their complexities. Now, a refined statement is suggested based on recent advances in high-dimensional Lorenz models and real-world global models. In this study, we provide a report to: (1) Illustrate two kinds of attractor coexistence within Lorenz models. Each kind contains two of three attractors including point, chaotic, and periodic attractors corresponding to steady-state, chaotic, and limit cycle solutions, respectively. (2) Suggest that the entirety of weather possesses the dual nature of chaos and order associated with chaotic and non-chaotic processes, respectively. Specific weather systems may appear chaotic or non-chaotic within their finite lifetime. While chaotic systems contain a finite practical predictability, non-chaotic systems (e.g., dissipative processes) could have better predictability (e.g., up to their lifetime). The refined view on the nature of weather is neither too optimistic nor pessimistic as compared to the Laplacian view of deterministic unlimited predictability and the Lorenz view of deterministic chaos with finite predictability. A preprint is available below: Shen, B.-W.*, R. A. Pielke Sr., X. Zeng, J.-J. Baik, T.A.L. Reyes#, S. Faghih-Naini#, R. Atlas, and J. Cui#, 2019: Is Weather Chaotic? Coexistence of Chaos and Order within a Generalized Lorenz Model Available from ResearchGate: http://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.21811.07204
Content may be subject to copyright.
1
A Dual Nature of Chaos and Order in Weather IHP, Paris, France, 12 Nov. 2019
Is Weather Chaotic? Coexistence of Chaos and Order
Within a Generalized Lorenz Model
by
Bo-Wen Shen1*,Roger A. Pielke Sr.2,Xubin Zeng3, Jong-Jin Baik4,
Tiffany Reyes1, Sara Faghih-Naini5, Robert Atlas6, and Jialin Cui1
1San Diego State University, USA
2CIRES, University of Colorado at Boulder, USA
3The University of Arizona, USA
4Seoul National University, South Korea
5Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany
6AOML, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, USA
*Email: bshen@sdsu.edu; Web: https://bwshen.sdsu.edu
Big Data, Data Assimilation and Uncertainty Quantification
Institut Henri Poincaré (IHP), Paris, France
12-15 November 2019
2
A Dual Nature of Chaos and Order in Weather IHP, Paris, France, 12 Nov. 2019
Outline
vIntroduction
30 day Predictions of African Easterly Waves (AEWs) and Hurricanes
Goals and Approaches
vLorenz Models (Lorenz, 1963, 1969)
Chaos and Two Kinds of Butterfly Effects (BE1 and BE2)
The Lorenz 1963 Model and BE1/Chaos
Three Types of Solutions (e.g., Steady-state, Chaotic, and Limit Cycle Orbits)
The Lorenz 1969 Model and BE2/Instability
vMajor Features of Lorenz’s Butterfly
Divergence, Boundedness, and Recurrence
vA Generalized Lorenz Model (Shen, 2019a)
Slow and Fast Variables
Aggregated Nonlinear Negative Feedback
Two Kinds of Attractor Coexistence: Coexistence of Chaos and Order
vA Hypothetical Mechanism for Predictability of AEWs
vSummary and Outlook
4
A Dual Nature of Chaos and Order in Weather IHP, Paris, France, 12 Nov. 2019
Track Forecast Intensity Forecast
OBS
OBS
model
model
Shen, B.-W., W.-K. Tao, and M.-L. Wu, 2010b: African Easterly Waves and African Easterly Jet
in 30-day High-resolution Global Simulations. A Case Study during the 2006 NAMMA period.
Geophys. Res. Lett., L18803, doi:10.1029/2010GL044355.
(Hurricane Helene: 12-24 September, 2006)
How can high-resolution global models have skill?
Simulations of Helene (2006) Between Day 22-30
5
A Dual Nature of Chaos and Order in Weather IHP, Paris, France, 12 Nov. 2019
Goals and Approaches
To achieve our goals, we performed a comprehensive literature review and
derived a generalized Lorenz model (GLM) to:
1. understand butterfly effects (i.e., chaos theory),
2. reveal and detect the coexistence of chaotic and non-chaotic
processes,
3. emphasize the dual nature of chaos and order in weather, and
4. propose a hypothetical mechanism for the periodicity and predictability
(of multiple African easterly waves, AEWs)
Our goals include addressing the following questions:
Can global models have skill for extended-range (15-30 day)
numerical weather prediction? Why?
Is weather chaotic?
6
A Dual Nature of Chaos and Order in Weather IHP, Paris, France, 12 Nov. 2019
Outline
vIntroduction
30 day Predictions of African Easterly Waves (AEWs) and Hurricanes
Goals and Approaches
vLorenz Models (Lorenz, 1963, 1969)
Chaos and Two Kinds of Butterfly Effects (BE1 and BE2)
The Lorenz 1963 Model and BE1/Chaos
Three Types of Solutions (e.g., Steady-state, Chaotic, and Limit Cycle Orbits)
The Lorenz 1969 Model and BE2/Instability
vMajor Features of Lorenz’s Butterfly
Divergence, Boundedness, and Recurrence
vA Generalized Lorenz Model (Shen, 2019)
Slow and Fast Variables
Aggregated Nonlinear Negative Feedback
Two Kinds of Attractor Coexistence: Coexistence of Chaos and Order
vA Hypothetical Mechanism for Predictability of AEWs
vSummary and Outlook
7
A Dual Nature of Chaos and Order in Weather IHP, Paris, France, 12 Nov. 2019
Butterfly Effect of the First and Second Kind
Two kinds of butterfly effects can be identified as follows (Lorenz, 1963, 1972):
1. The butterfly effect of the first kind (BE1):
Indicating sensitive dependence on initial conditions (Lorenz, 1963).
control run (blue):
!" #" $ % &'"("')
parallel run (red):
!" #" $ % '"( * +" ' "
+ % (, -('.
continuous dependence
(within a time interval)
sensitive dependence
2. The butterfly effect of the second kind (BE2):
ametaphor (or symbol ) for indicating that small perturbations can create
a large-scale organized system (Lorenz, 1972/1969).
8
A Dual Nature of Chaos and Order in Weather IHP, Paris, France, 12 Nov. 2019
The Lorenz (1963) Model (3DLM)
Note that X, Y, and Z represent the amplitudes of Fourier modes for the
streamfunction and temperature.
A phase space (or state space) is defined using the state variables X, Y
and Z as coordinates. The dimension of the phase space is determined by
the number of variables.
A trajectory or orbit is defined by time varying components within the
phase space, also known as a solution.
Two nonlinear terms form a nonlinear feedback loop (NFL).
r Rayleigh number: (Ra/Rc)
a dimensionless measure of the temperature
difference between the top and bottom surfaces of
a liquid; proportional to effective force on a fluid;
σ Prandtl number: (ν/κ)
the ratio of the kinetic viscosity (κ, momentum
diffusivity) to the thermal diffusivity (ν);
b Physical proportion: (4/(1+a2)), b = 8/3;
a a=l/m, the ratio of the vertical height, h, of the
fluid layer to the horizontal size of the convection
rolls. b = 8/3; l = aπ/H and m = π/H.
The classical Lorenz model (Lorenz, 1963) with three variables and
three parameters, referred to as the 3DLM, is written as follows:
9
A Dual Nature of Chaos and Order in Weather IHP, Paris, France, 12 Nov. 2019
Three Attractors Within the 3DLM
A steady-state solution
with a small r
A chaotic solution
with a moderate r
A limit cycle
with a large r
Depending on the relative strength of dissipations, four types of solutions within
dissipative systems are:
a. Steady state solutions with a weak heating term (i.e., ! < !
#; !
#=24.74);
b. Chaotic solutions with a moderate heating term (i.e., !
#< r < *#; *#=313 );
c. Limit cycle solutions with a strong heating term (i.e., *#< !);
d. Coexistence of chaotic and steady-state solutions (24.06 <!<24.74).
control run in blue
parallel run in red
10
A Dual Nature of Chaos and Order in Weather IHP, Paris, France, 12 Nov. 2019
Three Attractors Within the 3DLM
A steady-state solution
with a small r
A chaotic solution
with a moderate r
A limit cycle
with a large r
A point attractor A chaotic attractor A periodic attractor
(a spiral sink)
!
"< r < %"
11
A Dual Nature of Chaos and Order in Weather IHP, Paris, France, 12 Nov. 2019
Limit Cycle: An Isolated Closed Orbit
A limit cycle (black) is indicated by the
convergence of 200 orbits (color).
A limit cycle (LC) is an isolated closed
orbit.
Nearby trajectories spiral into it.
LC orbits are determined by the
structure of the system itself. It has no
long term memory regarding ICs.
dependence of phases on ICs
oscillatory errors
color orbits: ! ∈ [1,10]
black orbit ! ∈ [9,10]r=350
12
A Dual Nature of Chaos and Order in Weather IHP, Paris, France, 12 Nov. 2019
Impact of Initial Tiny Perturbations Within the 3DLM
Steady state or nonlinear periodic solutions have no (long-term) memory
regarding their initial tiny perturbations
Øinitial tiny perturbations completely dissipate
Chaotic solutions display a sensitive dependence on initial conditions
Øinitial tiny perturbations do not dissipate (before making a large
impact)
3DLM: within the chaotic solutions, any tiny perturbation can cause large
impacts. Is this feature realistic?
We may ask what kind of impact tiny perturbations may introduce in real
world models
13
A Dual Nature of Chaos and Order in Weather IHP, Paris, France, 12 Nov. 2019
Concurrent Visualizations: Butterfly Effects?
A selected frame from a global animation of the vertical velocity in pressure coordinates from a run
initialized at 0000 UTC 21 October 2005. The corresponding animation is available as a google
document: http://bit.ly/2GS2flD. The animation displays dissipation of the initial noise associated with an
imbalance between the model and the initial conditions (Shen, 2019b and references therein)
14
A Dual Nature of Chaos and Order in Weather IHP, Paris, France, 12 Nov. 2019
Lorenz 1963 and 1969 Models
Lorenz (1963) Model (3DLM): èBE1
nonlinear and chaotic
limited scale interactions (3 modes)
Lyapunov exponent (LE) analysis
KE and PE, PDE based (Rayleigh-
Benard Convection)
Lorenz (1972/1969) Model: èBE2
multiscale but linear (21 modes)
growth rate analysis using a realistic
basic state
KE,PDE based (a conservative
system with no forcing or dissipation)
Lorenz (1996/2005) Model:
nonlinear and chaotic with multiple
spatial scales
equal weighting in dissipations
KE, not PDE based
2D (x,z) flow
2D (x,y) flow
Also see Rotunno and Synder
(2008) and Durran and Gingrich
(2014)
No PDEs
15
A Dual Nature of Chaos and Order in Weather IHP, Paris, France, 12 Nov. 2019
Comments on the Lorenz 1984 Model (Lorenz, 1990)
The above idealized system was proposed by Lorenz in 1984 for qualitatively
depicting atmospheric circulation, known as the Lorenz (1984) model. Due to the
following issues, results obtained using the Lorenz 1984 model should be
analyzed and interpreted with caution:
1. Detailed derivations of the Lorenz (1984) model were missing (e.g., Veen
2002a, b); it is difficult to trace the physical source of the forcing terms
(parameters “F” and “G” in Eqs. (1)-(3) of Lorenz 1984) in the model.
2. As compared to fully dissipative systems where the time change rate of
volume of the solutions is negative, the volume of the solution within the 1984
model does not necessarily shrink to zero (e.g., p. 380 of Lorenz 1990).
The variable X represents the strength of
a large scale westerly-wind current, and
also the geostrophically equivalent large-
scale poleward temperature gradient;
Y and Z are the strengths of the cosine
and sine phases of a chain of superposed
waves, respectively.
16
A Dual Nature of Chaos and Order in Weather IHP, Paris, France, 12 Nov. 2019
Outline
vIntroduction
30 day Predictions of African Easterly Waves (AEWs) and Hurricanes
Goals and Approaches
vLorenz Models (Lorenz, 1963, 1969)
Chaos and Two Kinds of Butterfly Effects (BE1 and BE2)
The Lorenz 1963 Model and BE1/Chaos
Three Types of Solutions (e.g., Steady-state, Chaotic, and Limit Cycle Orbits)
The Lorenz 1969 Model and BE2/Instability
vMajor Features of Lorenz’s Butterfly
Divergence, Boundedness, and Recurrence
vA Generalized Lorenz Model (Shen, 2019a)
Slow and Fast Variables
Aggregated Nonlinear Negative Feedback
Two Kinds of Attractor Coexistence: Coexistence of Chaos and Order
vA Hypothetical Mechanism for Predictability of AEWs
vSummary and Outlook
17
A Dual Nature of Chaos and Order in Weather IHP, Paris, France, 12 Nov. 2019
What Lorenz’s Butterfly Really Reveals
2. Boundedness
No “blow-up” solutions
! " = $%& cos *" + , sin *"
oscillatory
grow or decay at an exponential rate
The statement of ``Orbits initially diverge and then curve back’’ includes the
following major features of butterfly solutions:
3. Recurrence/Folding
Complex eigenvalues, / = 0 + ,*:real
part leads to a growing or decaying
solution; imaginary part gives the
oscillatory component.
1. Divergence of Trajectories
5. Ergodicity (Hilborn, 2000)
Time averages are the same as state
space averages.
4. Error Saturations
Max errors determined by the “size” of
the butterfly’s wings
18
A Dual Nature of Chaos and Order in Weather IHP, Paris, France, 12 Nov. 2019
Based on the previous discussions, we may ask whether the following folklore
is an “accurate” analogy of the butterfly effect (Gleick, 1987; Drazin, 1992):
“For want of a nail, the shoe was lost.
For want of a shoe, the horse was lost.
For want of a horse, the rider was lost.
For want of a rider, the battle was lost.
For want of a battle, the kingdom was lost.
And all for the want of a horseshoe nail.”
However, Lorenz (2008) made the following comments:
1. Let me say right now that I do not feel that this verse is describing true
chaos, but better illustrates the simpler phenomenon of instability.
2. The implication is that subsequent small events will not reverse the outcome.
Chaos and the Butterfly Effect
Lorenz’s comments support the view that the verse neither describes (local)
time-varying convergence of trajectories nor indicates recurrence.
Do we all agree on the above? Prof. Lorenz expressed his concerns in 2008.
21
A Dual Nature of Chaos and Order in Weather IHP, Paris, France, 12 Nov. 2019
Outline
vIntroduction
30 day Predictions of African Easterly Waves (AEWs) and Hurricanes
Goals and Approaches
vLorenz Models (Lorenz, 1963, 1969)
Chaos and Two Kinds of Butterfly Effects (BE1 and BE2)
The Lorenz 1963 Model and BE1/Chaos
Three Types of Solutions (e.g., Steady-state, Chaotic, and Limit Cycle Orbits)
The Lorenz 1969 Model and BE2/Instability
vMajor Features of Lorenz’s Butterfly
Divergence, Boundedness, and Recurrence
vA Generalized Lorenz Model (Shen, 2019a)
Slow and Fast Variables
Aggregated Nonlinear Negative Feedback
Two Kinds of Attractor Coexistence: Coexistence of Chaos and Order
vA Hypothetical Mechanism for Predictability of AEWs
vSummary and Outlook
22
A Dual Nature of Chaos and Order in Weather IHP, Paris, France, 12 Nov. 2019
A Generalized Lorenz Model (GLM)
As discussed in Shen (2019a) and Shen et al. (2019), the GLM with many
M modes possesses the following features:
(1) any odd number of M greater than three; a conservative system in the
dissipationless limit;
(2) three types of solutions (that also appear within the 3DLM);
(3) energy transfer across scales by the nonlinear feedback loop (NFL);
(4) slow and fast variables across various scales;
(5) aggregated negative feedback;
(6) increased temporal complexities of solutions associated with
additional (incommensurate) frequencies that are introduced by the
extension of the NFL (i.e., spatial mode-mode interactions);
(7) hierarchical scale dependence;
(8) two kinds of attractor coexistence;
The 1st kind of Coexistence for Chaotic and Steady-state Solutions,
The 2nd kind of Coexistence for Limit Cycle and Steady-state Solutions.
23
A Dual Nature of Chaos and Order in Weather IHP, Paris, France, 12 Nov. 2019
A Generalized Lorenz Model (GLM)
The GLM is derived based on extensions of the NFL that can provide negative
nonlinear feedback to stabilize solutions. The GLM is written as follows:
3DLM
smaller
scale
modes
primary
scale
modes
The “backbone” of the linearized NFL is analogous to the spring of the above system.
A new pair of high wavenumber modes ("
#, %
#)that extends the NFL creates an
additional frequency in a new subsystem with a different spring constant.
(2)
(4)
(1)
(3)
(5)
(6)
24
A Dual Nature of Chaos and Order in Weather IHP, Paris, France, 12 Nov. 2019
Note that the GLM is coupled by the extension of the nonlinear feedback
loop and the coefficients of the terms on the right-hand sides continuously
increase in association with increasing inclusion of high wavenumber
modes, as shown in Eq. (4).
!"
!# $ %&' ()& % " *+,
-
.
!"
/
!# $ &'
/01 %. ( -
.&'
/%!/01
."
/. 2 3 4 . 2 -5 6 *7,
The following two equations suggest that "
/is a fast variable while
"is a slow variable when -8. is small (i.e., .is large).
Slow and Fast Variables Within the GLM
(2)
(4)
26
A Dual Nature of Chaos and Order in Weather IHP, Paris, France, 12 Nov. 2019
An Indicator of Aggregated Negative Feedback
model rcheating
terms
solutions references
3DLM 24.74 rX
steady
, chaotic, or LC
Lorenz
(1963)
3D-NLM n/a rX
periodic
Shen
(2018)
5DLM 42.9 rX
steady, chaotic, or
LC/LT
Shen
(2014a,2015a,b)
5D-NLM n/a rX
quasi
-periodic
Faghih
-Naini
and Shen (2018)
6DLM 41.1 rX, rX1
steady
or chaotic
Shen
(2015a,b)
7DLM 116.9 rX
steady
,chaotic or LC/LT
Shen (2016, 2017)
7D-NLM n/a rX
quasi
-periodic
Shen and
Faghih-Naini
(2017)
8DLM 103.4 rX, rX1
steady
or chaotic
Shen (2017)
9DLM 102.9
rX, rX
1, rX2
steady
or chaotic
Shen (2017)
9DLMr 679.8 rX
steady
, chaotic, or LC/LT
Shen (2019a)
rc: a critical value of the Raleigh parameter for the onset of chaos; LC: limit cycle; LT: limit torus
A comparison of the 3D, 5D, 7D and 9D LMs, requiring larger heating parameters
for the onset of chaos in higher-dimensional LMs, indicates aggregated negative
feedback by small scale modes.
27
A Dual Nature of Chaos and Order in Weather IHP, Paris, France, 12 Nov. 2019
In Relation to Non-autonomous Systems
ØAn extension of the NFL by an additional pair of small scale modes can
introduce one frequency that is incommensurate with existing frequencies.
The impact may be partially “emulated” by the inclusion of a periodic forcing
into the original system, yielding a non-autonomous system, as discussed
below. [Note that the introduced frequency is not necessarily
incommensurate.]
ØThe negative feedback associated with an additional pair of small scale modes
can be “parameterized” into the original system. If the system allows the
parameterized impact to be on or off as time proceeds. It is a non-autonomous
system.
!"
!# $ %" & '()*+#,
!-
!# $+./
!"
!# $ %" & -
!.
!# $ 0+-
A high dimensional
autonomous system
A low dimensional
system + a forcing term
1 $ %2 34+- 5 $ 5/ . 5 $ 0+
28
A Dual Nature of Chaos and Order in Weather IHP, Paris, France, 12 Nov. 2019
The First Kind of Attractor Coexistence Within the 9DLM
For the 1st kind of attractor coexistence within the 9DLM, the appearance of
a steady state solution (left and middle) or a chaotic solution (right)
depends on the initial conditions. This indicates final state sensitivity to ICs.
non-chaotic orbits chaotic orbit
r=680
29
A Dual Nature of Chaos and Order in Weather IHP, Paris, France, 12 Nov. 2019
Figure: Time evolution of 2,048 orbits in the X-Y3-Z3 space using the 9DLM, showing spiral sinks
and a limit cycle/torus solution. The animation is available from https://goo.gl/sMhoUb.
A limit cycle (LC) is an isolated
closed orbit.
Nearby trajectories spiral into it.
LC orbits are determined by the
structure of the system itself.
§The total simulation time is !=
3.5.
§Transient orbits are only kept for
the last 0.25 time units, i.e. for the
time interval of [max (0, T-0.25),
T] at a given time T.
§The zoom-in of the domain starts
at != 0.25 and ends at != 0:45,
leading to a smooth domain
change from (X, Y3, Z3) = (-
1300,1200) x (-1100, 1100) x (-
1000,1700) to (-300;200) x (-
100,100) x (0,700).
The Second Kind of Attractor Coexistence Within the 9DLM
r=1600
30
A Dual Nature of Chaos and Order in Weather IHP, Paris, France, 12 Nov. 2019
Two Kinds of Dependence on ICs
The 9DLM with attractor coexistence reveals:
final state sensitivity to ICs, i.e., ICs determine whether
solutions are chaotic or steady state;
sensitive dependence on ICs for chaotic solutions; and
no long term memory regarding ICs for steady solutions.
An initial tiny perturbation:
may be important or unimportant within the attractor
coexistence of the 9DLM, depending on various kinds of
orbits (i.e., various basins of attraction);
is always important within the chaotic solutions of the 3DLM.
Any tiny perturbation can cause large impacts.
Shen, B.-W., 2019a: Aggregated Negative Feedback in a Generalized Lorenz Model. International
Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos Vol. 29, No. 3 (2019) 1950037 (20 pages).
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218127419500378
32
A Dual Nature of Chaos and Order in Weather IHP, Paris, France, 12 Nov. 2019
Outline
vIntroduction
30 day Predictions of African Easterly Waves (AEWs) and Hurricanes
Goals and Approaches
vLorenz Models (Lorenz, 1963, 1969)
Chaos and Two Kinds of Butterfly Effects (BE1 and BE2)
The Lorenz 1963 Model and BE1/Chaos
Three Types of Solutions (e.g., Steady-state, Chaotic, and Limit Cycle Orbits)
The Lorenz 1969 Model and BE2/Instability
vMajor Features of Lorenz’s Butterfly
Divergence, Boundedness, and Recurrence
vA Generalized Lorenz Model (Shen, 2019a)
Slow and Fast Variables
Aggregated Nonlinear Negative Feedback
Two Kinds of Attractor Coexistence: Coexistence of Chaos and Order
vA Hypothetical Mechanism for Predictability of AEWs
vSummary and Outlook
33
A Dual Nature of Chaos and Order in Weather IHP, Paris, France, 12 Nov. 2019
Oscillatory Forecast Scores in the 30 Day Run: Why?
0.65
0.75
Aug 22 Sep 21
Correlation
Coefficients (CCs)
Is the forecast score a
monotonically
decreasing function of
time?
Note that (1) a limit cycle
is oscillatory; and (2) two
chaotic orbits may
produce time varying
convergence and
divergence
34
A Dual Nature of Chaos and Order in Weather IHP, Paris, France, 12 Nov. 2019
A Hypothetical Mechanism for the Predictability
at Extended-Range Scales
Shen, B.-W., 2019b: On the Predictability of 30-day Global Mesoscale Simulations of Multiple African Easterly Waves during Summer 2006: A
View with a Generalized Lorenz Model. Geosciences 2019, 9(7), 281; https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences9070281
Limit Cycle African Easterly Waves (AEWs)
system conditions
strong heating + nonlinearity
during summer (JAS)
features periodic recurrent, 27 AEWs per year
errors oscillatory oscillatory CCs
The realistic simulation of Hurricane Helene (2006) from Day 22 to 30
became possible as a result of the realistic simulation of the
1. periodicity (or recurrence) of AEWs and
2. downscaling process of the 4th AEW.
3 days
36
A Dual Nature of Chaos and Order in Weather IHP, Paris, France, 12 Nov. 2019
Additional Support for Oscillatory Components
! " # $ % & '( )*+,
Lorenz (1990) applied the Lorenz (1984) model to reveal “chaotic winter
and non-chaotic summer” (in the bottom left figure)
Using the NCAR WACCM3 (Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model
Model), Liu et al. (2009) documented oscillatory root mean square (RMS)
errors (i.e., with no error saturation) (in the bottom right figure).
Based on dishpan experiments (e.g., Hide 1953), Lorenz (1993) suggested three
types of solutions, including: (1) steady state solutions, (2) chaotic solutions, and
(3) vacillation. “Amplitude vacillation” is defined as a solution whose amplitude
grows and periodically decays in a regular cycle (Lorenz 1963c; Ghil and
Childress 1987; Ghil et al. 2010). The amplitude vacillation can be viewed as a
limit cycle solution (e.g., Pedloksy, 1972; Smith and Reilly, 1977)
#'## )-./0,
A theoretical study suggested that 40-day intra-seasonal oscillations may arise
from a Hopf bifurcation off the blocking flow. The corresponding limit cycle has
a period of 40 days (Ghil and Robertson, 2002)
38
A Dual Nature of Chaos and Order in Weather IHP, Paris, France, 12 Nov. 2019
Concluding Remarks
1. Two kinds of butterfly effects in Lorenz studies can be defined as follows:
The BE1: the sensitive dependence of solutions on initial conditions;
The BE2: ametaphor for indicating the enabling role of a tiny
perturbation in producing an organized large-scale system.
2. The GLM possesses the following features:
a) Three types of attractors; b) Two kinds of attractor coexistence;
c) Aggregated negative feedback; d) Hierarchical scale dependence.
A higher-dimensional LM a lower-dimensional LM +forcing terms.
3. Chaotic solutions only appear within the finite range of the Rayleigh
parameters. Chaotic and non-chaotic orbits may coexist, displaying two
kinds of data dependence. The BE1 does not always appear.
4. As with Poincare and Birkhoff, everything centers around periodic
solutions,” Lorenz and chaos advocates focused on the existence of non-
periodic solutions and their complexities.
5. We propose that the entirety of weather possesses a dual nature of chaos
and order. The duality should be taken into consideration to revisit the
predictability problem.
39
A Dual Nature of Chaos and Order in Weather IHP, Paris, France, 12 Nov. 2019
Future Tasks
ØDetect (Nonlinear) Oscillatory Signals by
applying the Parallel Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition
(PEEMD) to decompose data into oscillatory modes and non-
oscillatory trend mode (Shen et al. 2017; Wu and Shen, 2016);
performing the Recurrence Analysis (Reyes and Shen, 2019a,b);
performing the Kernel Principle Component Analysis for
classification of solutions (Cui and Shen, 2019, under revision).
[Apply the above to analyze MJO signals and compare results with
those using the analysis of Real-time Multivariate MJO (RMM) Index]
ØImprove the Simulations of Nonlinear Oscillatory Signals (e.g., limit
cycle or quasi-periodic orbits) by
reducing numerical dissipations to avoid computational chaos (e.g.,
the Logistic equation vs. the Logistic map; Lorenz, 1989)
examining the potential impact of increased resolutions and newly
added components on the generation of new incommensurate or
commensurate frequencies, leading to quasi-periodic solutions.
40
A Dual Nature of Chaos and Order in Weather IHP, Paris, France, 12 Nov. 2019
vThe entirety of weather possesses a dual nature of chaos and order.
The above refined view is neither too optimistic nor pessimistic as
compared to the Laplacian view of deterministic predictability and
the Lorenz view of deterministic chaos.
v``there is no reason that the limit of predictability is a fixed number’’ as
suggested by Prof. Arakawa (Lewis, 2005, MWR).
In some cases, we obtained realistic predictions with a
predictability of over two weeks.
Takeaway Messages
41
A Dual Nature of Chaos and Order in Weather IHP, Paris, France, 12 Nov. 2019
Acknowledgments and References
We thank Drs. R. Anthes, B. Bailey, J. Buchmann, D. Durran, M. Ghil, B. Mapes,
Z. Musielak, T. Krishnamurti (Deceased), G C Layek, C.-D. Lin, J. Rosenfeld, R.
Rotunno, I. A. Santos, C.-L. Shie, S. Vannitsem, and F. Zhang (Deceased) for
valuable comments and discussions.
Selected References:
1. Shen, B.-W.*, R. A. Pielke Sr., X. Zeng, J.-J. Baik, T.A.L. Reyes#, S. Faghih-Naini#, R.
Atlas, and J. Cui#, 2019: Is Weather Chaotic? Coexistence of Chaos and Order within a
Generalized Lorenz Model (to be submitted; available from ResearchGate:
http://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.21811.07204)
2. Shen, B.-W.*, 2019a: Aggregated Negative Feedback in a Generalized Lorenz Model.
International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, Vol. 29, No. 3 (2019) 1950037 (20
pages). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218127419500378
3. Shen, B.-W.*, 2019b: On the Predictability of 30-day Global Mesoscale Simulations of
Multiple African Easterly Waves during Summer 2006: A View with a Generalized Lorenz
Model. Geosciences 2019, 9(7), 281; https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences9070281
4. Shen, B.-W.*, T. Reyes#, and S. Faghih-Naini#, 2018: Coexistence of Chaotic and Non-
Chaotic Orbits in a New Nine-Dimensional Lorenz Model. In: Skiadas C., Lubashevsky I.
(eds) 11th Chaotic Modeling and Simulation International Conference. CHAOS 2018.
Springer Proceedings in Complexity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-
15297-0_22
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
Recent advances in computational and global modeling technology have provided the potential to improve weather predictions at extended-range scales. In earlier studies by the author and his coauthors, realistic 30-day simulations of multiple African easterly waves (AEWs) and an averaged African easterly jet (AEJ) were obtained. The formation of hurricane Helene (2006) was also realistically simulated from Day 22 to Day 30. In this study, such extended predictability was further analyzed based on recent understandings of chaos and instability within Lorenz models and the generalized Lorenz model. The analysis suggested that a statement of the theoretical predictability of two weeks is not universal. New insight into chaotic and non-chaotic processes revealed by the generalized Lorenz model (GLM) indicated the potential for extending prediction lead times. Two major features within the GLM included: (1) three types of attractors (that also appeared in the original Lorenz model) and (2) two kinds of attractor coexistence. The features suggest a refined view on the nature of weather, as follows: The entirety of weather is a superset that consists of chaotic and non-chaotic processes. Better predictability can be obtained for stable, steady-state solutions and nonlinear periodic solutions that occur at small and large Rayleigh parameters, respectively. By comparison, chaotic solutions appear only at moderate Rayleigh parameters. Errors associated with dissipative small-scale processes do not necessarily contaminate the simulations of large scale processes. Based on the nonlinear periodic solutions (also known as limit cycle solutions), here, we propose a hypothetical mechanism for the recurrence (or periodicity) of successive AEWs. The insensitivity of limit cycles to initial conditions implies that AEW simulations with strong heating and balanced nonlinearity could be more predictable. Based on the hypothetical mechanism, the possibility of extending prediction lead times at extended range scales is discussed. Future work will include refining the model to better examine the validity of the mechanism to explain the recurrence of multiple AEWs.
Preprint
Full-text available
Key points for this study are as follows: (1) By revealing two kinds of attractor coexistence within Lorenz models (e.g., Shen 2019a; Shen et al. 2019; Reyes and Shen, 2019), we suggest that the entirety of weather possesses a dual nature of chaos and order with distinct predictability. (2) The refined view on the nature of weather is neither too optimistic nor pessimistic as compared to the Laplacian view of deterministic predictability that is unlimited and the Lorenz view of deterministic chaos with finite predictability. (3) The refined view may unify the theoretical understanding of different predictability within Lorenz models with recent numerical simulations of advanced global models that can simulate large-scale tropical waves beyond two weeks (e.g., Shen 2019b; Judt 2020).
Chapter
Full-text available
In this study, we present a new nine-dimensional Lorenz model (9DLM) that requires a larger critical value for the Rayleigh parameter (a rc of 679.8) for the onset of chaos, as compared to a rc of 24.74 for the 3DLM, a rc of 42.9 for the 5DLM, and a rc 116.9 for the 7DLM. Major features within the 9DLM include: (1) the coexistence of chaotic and non-chaotic orbits with moderate Rayleigh parameters, and (2) the coexistence of limit cycle/torus orbits and spiral sinks with large Rayleigh parameters. Version 2 of the 9DLM, referred to as the 9DLM-V2, is derived to show that: (i) based on a linear stability analysis, two non-trivial critical points are stable for all Rayleigh parameters greater than one; (ii) under non-dissipative and linear conditions, the extended nonlinear feedback loop produces four incommensurate frequencies; and (iii) for a stable orbit, small deviations away from equilibrium (e.g., the stable critical point) do not have a significant impact on orbital stability. Based on our results, we suggest that the entirety of weather is a superset that consists of both chaotic and non-chaotic processes.
Article
Full-text available
In this study, we first present a generalized Lorenz model (LM) with M modes, where M is an odd number that is greater than three. The generalized LM (GLM) is derived based on a successive extension of the nonlinear feedback loop (NFL) with additional high wavenumber modes. By performing a linear stability analysis with σ = 10 and b = 8/3, we illustrate that: (1) within the 3D, 5D, and 7D LMs, the appearance of unstable nontrivial critical points requires a larger Rayleigh parameter in a higher-dimensional LM and (2) within the 9DLM, nontrivial critical points are stable. By comparing the GLM with various numbers of modes, we discuss the aggregated negative feedback enabled by the extended NFL and its role in stabilizing solutions in high-dimensional LMs. Our analysis indicates that the 9DLM is the lowest order generalized LM with stable nontrivial critical points for all Rayleigh parameters greater than one. As shown by calculations of the ensemble Lyapunov exponent, the 9DLM still produces chaotic solutions. Within the 9DLM, a larger critical value for the Rayleigh parameter, rc = 679.8, is required for the onset of chaos as compared to a rc = 24.74 for the 3DLM, a rc = 42.9 for the 5DLM, and a rc = 116.9 for the 7DLM. In association with stable nontrivial critical points that may lead to steady-state solutions, the appearance of chaotic orbits indicates the important role of a saddle point at the origin in producing the sensitive dependence of solutions on initial conditions. The 9DLM displays the coexistence of chaotic and steady-state solutions at moderate Rayleigh parameters and the coexistence of limit cycle and steady-state solutions at large Rayleigh parameters. The first kind of coexistence appears within a smaller range of Rayleigh parameters in lower-dimensional LMs (i.e. 24.06 < r < 24.74 within the 3DLM) but in a wider range of Rayleigh parameters within the 9DLM (i.e. 679.8 < r < 1058). The second kind of coexistence has never been reported in high-dimensional Lorenz systems.
Lorenz (1993) suggested three types of solutions, including: (1) steady state solutions, (2) irregular chaotic solutions, and (3) vacillation
  • Fultz
• Based on dishpan experiments (e.g., Fultz et al. 1959; Hide 1953), Lorenz (1993) suggested three types of solutions, including: (1) steady state solutions, (2) irregular chaotic solutions, and (3) vacillation. "Amplitude vacillation" is defined as a solution whose amplitude grows and periodically decays in a regular cycle (Lorenz 1963c; Ghil and Childress 1987; Ghil et al. 2010). Studies by Pedlosky and Smith (e.g., Pedloksy 1972; Smith 1975; Smith and Reilly 1977) found that amplitude vacillation can be viewed as a limit cycle solution. 0 100 (-./0)
Future Tasks Ø Detect (Nonlinear) Oscillatory Signals by • applying the Parallel Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition (PEEMD) to decompose data into oscillatory modes and nonoscillatory trend mode
  • Shen
Future Tasks Ø Detect (Nonlinear) Oscillatory Signals by • applying the Parallel Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition (PEEMD) to decompose data into oscillatory modes and nonoscillatory trend mode (Shen et al. 2017; Wu and Shen, 2016);