ArticlePDF Available

Multifunctional public open spaces for sustainable cities: Concept and application

Authors:
  • University of Belgrade - Faculty of Architecture
  • University of Belgrade, Faculty of Architecture

Abstract and Figures

The idea that multifunctional open spaces support sustainable urban development has been widely accepted in theory and intensively used in practice of urban planning and design. It is based on the assumption that multifunctional spaces bring a wider spectrum of environmental, social and economic benefits to urban areas. And yet, multifunctionality of space is still a vague and diffuse concept that needs further clarifications. Besides that, different academic disciplines understand and use this concept in different ways. This makes the application of the concept difficult to assess and manage in relation to different aspects of urban sustainability. Through the literature review, this paper analyses and compares how the concept of multifunctionality is used in various spatial disciplines (urban planning and design, landscape architecture) in order to better understand and relate its different dimensions, applications and expected benefits for sustainable development. Based on this, a new, relational and multidimensional conceptualisation of the multifunctionality of public open spaces is proposed for analysis and assessment of urban design solutions. It is further applied and discussed in relation to students projects from “Ecological urban design studio” from the University of Belgrade Faculty of Architecture, as visions for development of multifunctional public open spaces in modernist mass housing area of “Sava Blocks” in New Belgrade, Serbia.
Content may be subject to copyright.
FACTA UNIVERSITATIS
Series: Architecture and Civil Engineering Vol. 17, No 2, 2019, pp. 205-219
https://doi.org/10.2298/FUACE190327012Z
© 2019 by University of Niš, Serbia | Creative Commons License: CC BY-NC-ND
MULTIFUNCTIONAL PUBLIC OPEN SPACES
FOR SUSTAINABLE CITIES: CONCEPT AND APPLICATION
UDC 711.4:502.131.1
711.61
Jelena Živković, Ksenija Lalović, Milica Milojević, Ana Nikezić
University of Belgrade Faculty of Architecture, Belgrade, Serbia
Abstract. The idea that multifunctional open spaces support sustainable urban development
has been widely accepted in theory and intensively used in practice of urban planning and
design. It is based on the assumption that multifunctional spaces bring a wider spectrum of
environmental, social and economic benefits to urban areas. And yet, multifunctionality of
space is still a vague and diffuse concept that needs further clarifications. Besides that,
different academic disciplines understand and use this concept in different ways. This makes
the application of the concept difficult to assess and manage in relation to different aspects of
urban sustainability. Through the literature review, this paper analyses and compares how
the concept of multifunctionality is used in various spatial disciplines (urban planning and
design, landscape architecture) in order to better understand and relate its different
dimensions, applications and expected benefits for sustainable development. Based on this, a
new, relational and multidimensional conceptualisation of the multifunctionality of public
open spaces is proposed for analysis and assessment of urban design solutions. It is further
applied and discussed in relation to students projects from “Ecological urban design
studio” from the University of Belgrade Faculty of Architecture, as visions for development
of multifunctional public open spaces in modernist mass housing area of “Sava Blocks” in
New Belgrade, Serbia.
Key words: multifunctionality, public open space, sustainable urban development,
urban planning and design
1. INTRODUCTION
Planning and designing multifunctional spaces is not a new idea, and great vibrant and
vital urban spaces all over the world confirm its relevance and significance. Moreover, the
concept of multifunctional space is nowadays widely promoted in the context of the
sustainable spatial development, assuming that multifunctional spaces may bring a wider
Received March 27, 2019 / Accepted April 22, 2019
Corresponding author: Jelena Živković
University of Belgrade - Faculty of Architecture, Kralja Aleksandra Blvd, 73/2, Belgrade 11000, Serbia
E-mail: j_zivkovic@ptt.rs
206 J. ŽIVKOVIĆ, K. LALOVIĆ, M. MILOJEVIĆ, A. NIKEZ
spectrum of environmental, social and economic benefits to urban areas and thus
contribute to urban sustainability.
Although the concept has been intensively used in spatial and strategic plans and projects
at different scales, there is an on-going debate of what multifunctionality is, and how it can
be best related to development [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]. These debates on urban and rural
change, stress the problem of uncritical and weakly theorised use of the notion of
„multifunctionality‟, and recognise that the concept is still vague, diffused, and prone to
different interpretations [8]. In addition, different academic disciplines understand and use
the idea of multifunctionality in different ways, which makes its application difficult to
assess and manage in relation to different aspects of sustainable urban development [9] [10].
At the same time, the idea of what urban functions are, changed as well. In the
contemporary planning and design theory, the new integrated approaches to spatial
development recognise new dimensions of functionality, and affirm the wider meaning of
this term. For example, in elaborating her theory of integral urbanism, Nan Elin suggests
new functionalities of an urban space that supports urban vitality. In this approach,
functionality refers not only to classical urban functions - activities and use of space - but
also ecological, emotional, symbolic and spiritual functions of space [11]. Moreover, in the
field of landscape planning and architecture, the concepts of ecosystem services and green
infrastructure are gaining much attention as a new way of perceiving the relation between
nature and culture, attributing to Nature different values for spatial development [12].
In that context, this article aims to contribute to the debate on the meaning and use of
concept of multifunctionality for sustainable spatial development, by specifically focusing on
public open spaces in urban contexts. In a search for how to conceptualise multifunctionality
of public open spaces to best support urban sustainability, it first provides a conceptual and
theoretical analysis of the meaning and scope of the concept of multifunctionality of spaces
in different spatial disciplines (urban planning and design, landscape planning and
architecture). The aim of the analysis is to derive and determine various dimensions and
different interpretations of the notion of functionality of spaces (that further influence how
the concept is applied in practice), and to relate them to the concept and aspects of
sustainable urban development.
Based on the findings, in the second part of the paper, we argue for relational and
multidimensional approach to multifunctionality of space, and develop a new analytical
framework for reading and evaluating multifunctionality of public open spaces in relation
to ecological, socio-cultural and economic aspects of sustainable urban development. In
the last section we showcase its application in the context of modernist mass housing area,
through visionary students projects from “Ecological urban design studio” from
University of Belgrade Faculty of Architecture.
2. UNDERSTANDING THE CONCEPT OF MULTIFUNCTIONALITY IN SPATIAL DISCIPLINES
2.1. What is (multi)functionality?
Functionality refers to the ability to perform a task or a function. The meaning of
functionality is relative and depends on which medium is considered as the carrier of an
ability to perform the task/function - space, object, or activity (or even process) and for
what purpose. In that sense, multifunctionality is a feature of space, artifact or activity
Multifunctional Public Open Spaces for Sustainable Cities: Concept and Application 207
that means having or fulfilling several functions and achieving multiple outputs, purposes
or goals at the same time. Multifunctionality can be also understood as a value that
contributes to the simultaneous solution of multiple problems or the achievement of
multiple benefits. But it is not a value per se; it becomes a value only when related to the
specific purpose and goals [10].
2.2. Multifunctionality in spatial analysis: multifunctionality in SPACE and TIME
Conceptualized as a characteristic of space, multifunctionality refers to "the possibility of
having more than one activity or function in the same SPACE and / or at the same TIME" [1].
In that sense, it is seen as a characteristic of the space that enables a synchronic or diachronic
realization of various economic, social and environmental benefits.
Multifunctionality of space is a relative concept that depends on the spatial coverage that
is the subject of the analysis (SCALE), or the spatial situation in which multifunctionality is
considered. For example, in the size of the whole city it is always possible to identify
multifunctionality, but it can be a set of fragments of mono-functional areas [5]. In addition,
whether a site has one or more purposes or activities, also depends on its capacity to host
activities with specific space requirements [1].
In relation to spatial development, the analysis of multifunctionality is possible on two
grounds: on the supply side and on the demand side [9]. Multifunctionality viewed from the
side of the offer, can be seen as a characteristic/feature of space or object (resources) that
enables the realisation of the activities that achieve desired effects, as intentionally or
consequently realised. Observed from the demand side, multifunctionality can be viewed as
a social goal/value. Such a perspective starts from the social expectations in relation to a
certain activity (use) and is related to the achievement of desired qualities of the particular
territory [13].
The concept of multifunctionality of space and its relation to socio-spatial development
is an important topic not only in urban planning and design, but also in other spatial
disciplines such as landscape planning and architecture, forestry, agriculture. However,
different scientific disciplines have different understandings and interpretations of this
concept that we will further consider in more detail.
2.3. Multifunctionality in urban planning and design: multifunctional USE of space
The notion of multifunctionality came into focus of urban planning and design theory
and practice due to the problems of spatial fragmentation, social segregation and traffic
congestion, perceived as indicators of the decline in the ecological, social and economic
quality of modern cities. The Functional-segregation doctrine of modern urbanism has
been accused to be a key cause of the aforementioned problems [14].
As opposed to that, the concepts of mixed use of space and multifunctional land use were
offered as a way to achieve better land utilization and greater vitality of the city. These concepts
may be applied at different spatial scales and to both buildings and open spaces [5].While
mixed use of space is related to enabling residential, commercial, cultural, institutional, or
entertainment activities to take place in a certain area, multifunctional land use is understood as
a combination of different socio-economic functions in the same area, where the focus is on
achieving social and economic benefits from the USE OF SPACE [6]. Several different
planning and design approaches to mixed land use were developed, such as "new urbanism",
208 J. ŽIVKOVIĆ, K. LALOVIĆ, M. MILOJEVIĆ, A. NIKEZ
"smart growth", "compact city", etc. They differ in the purpose of multiplying functions in
space, and in spatial scale they applied, but in all these approaches use of urban land stands at
the core [15]. Based on literature review [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] the following types of
multifunctional land use can be identified in relation to space and time:
Mixed use of the land different functions are interconnected in a certain area;
Multiple use of the land different functions exist within the site, not necessarily
integrated;
Multifunctional use includes both horizontal and vertical combining of functions in
order to achieve synergies;
Multifunctional use over time space can have different functions at different
moments.
In urban planning and design, multifunctionality of urban open spaces refers to use of
both civic (built) and green spaces. Different types of urban open spaces (parks, gardens,
edges, playgrounds, squares, pedestrian zones, wildlife habitats) can have a variety of
functions and be used for different activities: recreation, play, movement, education, wildlife
habitat setting, landscaping, agriculture, community development [16]. The application of
the concept has historically been linked to central locations, but has over time, extended to
other parts of the city. Unfortunately, until recently, functionality of land per se (ex.
ecological value of undeveloped areas) was not taken fully into account when evaluating
qualities of urban areas. Besides that, multiplication and increase of use of some urban green
open spaces, caused their degradation and undermined their ecological sustainability.
2.4. Multifunctionality in landscape architecture and planning:
landscape and ecosystem SERVICES
Within the disciplines of landscape planning and architecture, the concept of
multifunctionality of space is based on the understanding of ecological relationships and
processes in landscape. The landscape is understood as "an area, as perceived by people,
whose character is the result of the action and interaction of natural and/or human factors”
[17], and landscape functions-services are the benefits it brings to human well-being and to
society [18]. Goods and services that different types of landscapes provide include:
production of food and timber, water purification and climate regulation, biodiversity,
aesthetics values and opportunities for recreation [19]. The provision of these services is
based upon the performance of ecological structures, processes and functions [6].
In that sense, multifunctionality relates to the phenomenon that the landscape can provide
multiple tangible and intangible goods and services that meet social needs or respond to
social or economic requirements [7]. From this perspective, urban open spaces are perceived
as parts of urban landscape, and their functionality is perceived as landscape functions based
on natural and cultural ecosystem services. Landscapes themselves have various dimensions
of quality that can be linked to various options of socio-spatial development. But, in
practice, due to traditionally favouring nature over culture in landscape disciplines, the
existing conservative attitude towards natural elements in urban areas neglects social and
economic issues of development. There are still tendencies to maximise quantity of green
spaces in urban areas without considering its economic sustainability, and to underestimate
(or even perceive as negative) the value of built open spaces for urban life and development.
Multifunctional Public Open Spaces for Sustainable Cities: Concept and Application 209
This restricts the full use of the concept of multifunctionality of landscapes and open spaces
for sustainable urban development.
Fig. 1 Potsdamer platz, Berlin multifunctional use and ecosystem services (A. Kujučev)
2.5. Meanings and dimensions of multifunctionality of space
The analysis reveals that conceptualisation of multifunctionality of space is possible on
several grounds. It can be understood from spatial and temporal, as well as from the use and
service perspective. At the same time, multifunctionality has been differently understood and
interpreted in different spatial disciplines. Each of these perspectives stresses one aspect of
relation to urban development. Seen individually and disciplinary, they do not fully use the
potential of urban spaces for sustainable urban development.
The possibility to understand multifunctionality as a feature of space, but also as a value
that contributes to the simultaneous solution of multiple problems or the achievement of
multiple benefits, forms the basis for linking multifunctionality and sustainable development.
Based on this, multifunctionality can be understood as a tool for urban ecological, social and
economic sustainability, as well as a normative concept that evaluates the quality of
sustainable development policies.
This is especially important for planning and designing public open spaces, as urban
spaces that are generally open and accessible to a variety of people, whose sustainability
depends on how they are perceived and valued by people. Therefore, based on results of our
literature review and analysis, in the next section we will focus on the relation between
public open spaces and sustainable urban development, and draft a basic conceptualisation
of multifunctionality of public open spaces for better achievement and harmonisation of
different aspects of sustainability.
3. CONCEPTUALISING MULTIFUNCTIONALITY OF PUBLIC OPEN SPACES
FOR DEVELOPMENT OF SUSTAINABLE CITIES
3.1. Concept of sustainable development in urban planning and design
The concept of sustainable development is value-based, resource and goal-oriented
concept that tends to balance and integrate environmental issues and socio-economic
development in order to equitably meet developmental and environmental needs of present
and future generations, improve quality of life standards for everyone, and better protect and
manage ecosystems. Anthropocentric and focused on the human well-being, this approach
involves taking care of the overall living and non-living environment, understanding that
210 J. ŽIVKOVIĆ, K. LALOVIĆ, M. MILOJEVIĆ, A. NIKEZIĆ
people depend on healthy ecosystems as much as they depend on other people. In that sense,
sustainability is a requirement for long-term social, cultural, economic and environmental
health and vitality [20].
In urban planning and design, this approach represents a breakthrough in relation to the
traditional movements of environmental protection, which were focused primarily on the
protection and conservation of nature. It assumes that destructive behaviours can be
transformed towards a more productive and healthier environment and "represents a process
of social transformation in which all vital functions of the community are maintained
indefinitely and without jeopardizing the basis on which they are based" [21]. Understood in
this way, the key to sustainable urban development is harmonisation of ecological, socio-
cultural and economic values and goals.
3.2. Why are urban open spaces important for sustainable development?
Urban open spaces are all physically un-built spaces within the city's territory [22]. They are
integral parts of the urban structure and through their own values contribute to the quality of life
in cities. Open spaces can be planned and designed to perform various urban functions:
movement and traffic, recreation, gathering, water management ..., but also "non-urban
activities", such as agricultural production, forestry and nature conservation. Their purpose is
related to their position in the city structure and to urban activities in surrounding areas [23].
The function of urban open spaces is conditioned by their materiality and physical structure. In
this sense, they differ in relation to the presence and character of natural features in space. They
exist in a wide range of forms of built (civic) and green open spaces. Taking into account the
complexity of urban needs, all the categories of open spaces are equally important for the
quality of life in the city [20].
Public open spaces (POS) are social spaces that are open and accessible to people. They are
simultaneously a part of the urban open space system and a part of the public sphere. Besides
their aesthetic and functional qualities, POS have various social functions and contribute to the
urban identity. They operate as the arenas for social interaction and places for cultural exchange
[24]. These places are also "containers of collective memory and desire... and places for
geographic and social imagination to extend new relationships and sets of possibility" [25]. If
well planned and designed, they may serve as an integrative element in urban structure, and
contribute to urban sustainability based on their ecological, socio-cultural and economic
functions and values [26]:
THE ECOLOGICAL VALUE of an urban open space is based on its bio-physical
characteristics that support natural systems and biodiversity. All components of the urban
green infrastructure have ecological value per se, but built open spaces can contribute to
ecological sustainability of urban areas too. If located, planned and designed based on
ecological principles, they can enhance environmental quality of urban space by effecting
urban climate, water and air quality.
THE SOCIO-CULTURAL VALUE of an urban open space is many-fold. First, they
can function as community meeting places for different levels of social interaction and
engagement, thus contributing to social sustainability of the area. At the same time they can
function as places where strangers encounter and mix up in pleasurable or contesting events,
expressing the “right” to the city, contributing to sustainable urban development by nurturing
the democratic culture. Public open spaces also have a cultural dimension, since through
Multifunctional Public Open Spaces for Sustainable Cities: Concept and Application 211
symbolic representation and everyday practices they contribute to the formation of local
cultures and identities.
THE ECONOMIC VALUE of an urban open space is based on the capacity to
function as a resource for various economic sectors: agriculture, forestry, leisure and
tourism…In addition, high quality and convivial public open spaces make cities and urban
areas attractive for tourists and new inhabitants, by providing a positive image of a place that
is desirable for living and visiting.
Besides contributing to urban sustainability by bringing new values to urban areas, public
spaces can also be perceived as indicators of urban sustainability. Negative phenomena in
the urban areas, such as ecological degradation, economic weakening of the area, neglect,
under-use and devastation of space, are manifestation of unsustainable life patterns and
urban development policies.
3.3. Multifunctionality of public open spaces for sustainable urban development:
developing an analytical model
In order to fully use the potential of the concept of multifunctionality to support
sustainable development, we propose a matrix as an analytical model that relates different
dimensions of multifunctionality of public open spaces to the ecological, socio-cultural and
economic aspects of sustainability. In this framework multifunctionality of public open space
is understood as a feature, characteristics that become value only when related to a certain
set of development goals in a specific context. At the same time, multifunctionality of a
public open space is perceived as multidimensional in order to better relate to various
aspects of sustainable development (ecological, socio-cultural, economics) and thus
contribute to their harmonisation. Dimensions of multifunctionality are defined in relation
to: space, time, use and services provided by land:
SPACE dimension refers to how different functions are distributed in space horizontally
and vertically, as well as in relation to the scale (location, area,…). Mixed, multiple and
multifunctional use may be considered.
TIME dimension refers to how different functions are distributed in time synchronic
and diachronic multifunctionality is possible. "Diachrony" refers to the disposition(s) of
functions across time. "Synchrony" refers to the disposition of different functions at one
specific moment in time.
USE dimension refers to provision of possibilities for people and other living beings to
use the space in different ways - based on urban design to enable activities and/or through
organisation of special events.
SERVICE dimension refers to the capacity of land (natural or built) to provide
tangible and intangible goods, services and amenities to people and nature
In the new analytical model - different dimensions of multifunctionality are related to
different aspects of sustainability in order to reveal possible positive and negative impacts
of multifunctional design solutions, as presented in Table 1.
212 J. ŽIVKOVIĆ, K. LALOVIĆ, M. MILOJEVIĆ, A. NIKEZIĆ
Table 1 Public open space multifunctionality in relation to aspects of sustainability
4. ANALYSING CONTRIBUTION OF MULTIFUNCTIONAL PUBLIC OPEN SPACES
TO SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF MODERNIST MASS HOUSING
The new model for analyzing the contribution and effects of multifunctional public open
spaces on sustainable development is applied to visionary students urban design projects.
The aim is to determine a) how different design solutions of multifunctional public spaces
may contribute to the sustainable development of public promenade in modernist mass
housing area, and to b) help identify possible shortcomings in order to reveal issues that need
harmonization of sustainability goals. Examples were selected to showcase different
approaches to multifunctionality of public open spaces, while addressing the same problem
of underuse of the green public promenade. All cases are based on the water as natural
element in urban space and theme that leads urban design visions.
Multifunctional Public Open Spaces for Sustainable Cities: Concept and Application 213
4.1. Context and purpose of developing multifunctional public open spaces
“Sava Blocks” in New Belgrade, Serbia is a modernist mass housing area that comprises
several super blocks (45, 44, 70). They are inter-connected by two parallel green promenades:
centrally located "Lazaro Kardenasa Promenade" and “Sava river Promenade”. These
promenades form a part of well developed public open space system of super-blocks. They
are characterised by high quantity of green public open spaces, but also with the problem of
their underuse and neglect, especially in the Lazaro Kardenasa promenade case. Therefore,
the purpose was to investigate possibilities for developing multifunctional public open
spaces, as places where nature and culture connect, overlap and permeate, in order to
contribute to sustainable development of “Sava Blocks”.
4.2. Case 1 “Water leads to water”
The project explores the relationship of the Block 45 with water, based on the fact that
the block is located on the Sava riverfront and that this feature defines the block‟s identity.
Moreover, the groundwater levels in the block are high and it is often threatened by
flooding.
Fig. 2 Case 1 - Water leads to water- Milica Pavić
Key questions that are addressed in the project were: 1) what does water mean to
different users, and 2) how to use water in urban design so that it contribute to the
adaptation of cities to climate change? It was presumed that through the development of
multifunctional public spaces as adaptation measures to climate change (at area, system
and local level), it is possible to create an environmentally sustainable system of spaces,
which simultaneously protect Block 45 of floods and control drainage, and are attractive,
symbolic, useful and comfortable spaces for a variety of users (Figure 2, Table 2).
214 J. ŽIVKOVIĆ, K. LALOVIĆ, M. MILOJEVIĆ, A. NIKEZIĆ
Table 2 Assessing sustainability of multifunctional public open space case 1
4.3. Case 2 “Vital space – water path”
The goal of the project was to activate the promenade Lazaro Kardenasa to become a
vital and vibrant place. The spatial concept is based on the idea to develop the promenade
as a complex system by designing multifunctional spaces for different purposes, related
both to culture and nature.
Fig. 3 Case 2 - Vital space- water path- Tamara Radić and Bogdan Popović
Focal social and economic activity points are located on the central position in the
promenade, providing different necessary and thematic uses of space. They are combined
with natural areas in order to support biodiversity and contact with nature. By their
interconnection, public open spaces and buildings are defined as community meeting
places. These natural and cultural sites located on the promenade are supported with a
variety of activities provided in surrounding areas (Figure 3, Table 3).
Multifunctional Public Open Spaces for Sustainable Cities: Concept and Application 215
Table 3 Assessing sustainability of multifunctional public open space case 2
4.4. Case 3 Promenade as a river flow
In order to overcome problems of under-use and neglect of the “Lazaro Kardenasa
promenade, “learning from nature was selected to be the guiding principle of the project.
Water was perceived as a mentor that guides development. The starting point for the project
was the analysis of main users groups of the promenade (children, old people, recreationalists
and people with dogs), their needs and the dynamic of their movement in public spaces.
Development of a multifunctional promenade was conceptualised as a system of river-flows
that connect and orchestrate flows of different user groups. A variety of ambiences was
developed on different segments of this “flows”, with a purpose to help people interact
among themselves and with nature. The presence of water was integrated in this system in
different forms and with different purposes: as a moderator of climate and place for water
management; as a symbol and a spiritual and emotional connector with Nature; or as a place
to relax or play. Basic commercial activities that support the public life and needs were also
proposed in nodal locations (Figure 3, Table 3).
216 J. ŽIVKOVIĆ, K. LALOVIĆ, M. MILOJEVIĆ, A. NIKEZIĆ
Fig. 4 Case 3 - Promenade as a river flow- Tamara Bošković
Table 4 Assessing sustainability of multifunctional public open space case 3
4.5. Discussion
Presented design projects had different primary purposes and that was reflected in the
design at both area and detailed levels, as well as in their expected performance. Anyway they
all provided systemic view and manage to contribute to all aspects of urban sustainability.
The new analytical model enabled broad understanding of the conditions for sustainability
of each project, by revealing space, time, service and use dimensions of multifunctionality. It
also enabled critical review of different design approaches by simultaneously relating different
dimensions of their functionality to various aspects of sustainable development. As such it
helped identifying benefits but also shortcomings and critical issues of implementation of
certain urban design solutions from ecological, social or economic aspects. The opportunity to
simultaneously analyse the effects of design solutions on different aspects of sustainability is
important for their harmonization in order to achieve sustainable cities. Based on this, it is
possible to conclude that a new approach can help evaluation of design alternatives, but can
also serve as a platform for discussion on alternative futures between different stakeholders in
Multifunctional Public Open Spaces for Sustainable Cities: Concept and Application 217
the planning process, by revealing potential environmental, socio-cultural and economic
benefits as well as critical issues of their application.
5. CONCLUSIONS
Our analysis revealed that multifunctionality is a complex concept that can be understood
and applied based on its spatial, temporal, use and service dimensions. It is an important
concept for sustainable urban development that has being differently understood and
interpreted in different spatial disciplines, which makes its application difficult to assess and
manage in relation to different aspects of sustainable urban development.
In order to better balance ecological, socio-cultural and economic development goals and,
at the same time, enable creative and context specific approach to design of urban space, the
concept of multifunctionality needs to be integrated into the planning and design of public open
spaces in a relational and multidimensional way. This means that multifunctionality should be
understood as a feature that becomes value only when related to certain set of development
goals in specific context. At the same time, multifunctionality of public open space should be
perceived as multidimensional in order to better relate to various aspects of sustainable
development (ecological, socio-cultural, economic) and to contribute to their balance.
A new analytical framework, based on these principles and outlined in this paper, confirmed
to be adequate for reading, analysing and assessing the contribution of multifunctional public
open spaces to sustainable urban development, and applicable in different situations. Its
application was showcased in the context of modernist mass housing, and it should be further
tested in other urban development situations. Anyway, we suppose that this new approach has a
significant potential for application in the planning and design practice. It can be used for
evaluation of urban design alternatives in a rational or collaborative planning process, but also
as a basis for the future public open space planning and design projects that aim to balance
cultural and natural values in urban space. We hope, that understood in this way, planning and
design of multifunctional public open spaces can more fully contribute to the quality of life in
cities and be a factor of urban sustainability and resilience.
Acknowledgement. The paper is a part of the research done within the Project TP 36035: “Spatial,
Environmental, Energy and Social Aspects of Developing Settlements and Climate Change - Mutual
Impacts financed by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the
Republic of Serbia.
REFERENCES
1. M. Batty, E. Besussi, K. Maat and J. Hars, “Representing multifunctional cities: density and diversity in space
and time”, Built Environment, 30(4), pp. 324–337, 2004. https://doi.org/10.2148/benv.30.4.324.57156
2. H. Haccou, et al, MILU Guide: practitioners handbook for multifunctional intensive land use, MILU net - The
Habiforum Fondation, Gouda, 2007.
3. E., Hoppenbrouwer and E. Louw, “Mixed-use development: theory and practice in Amsterdam‟s eastern
docklands, European Planning Studies 7 (13) pp. 967-983, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310500242048
4. I. B. Kajtazi, Measuring Multifunctionality of Urban Area, Thesis. International Institute for Geo-
Information Science, Enschede, The Netherlands, 2007.
218 J. ŽIVKOVIĆ, K. LALOVIĆ, M. MILOJEVIĆ, A. NIKEZIĆ
5. S. Majoor, “New Norms for Multiple Intensive Land Use", 39th Iso CaRO Congress, 2003.
www.isocarp.net/Data/case_studies/306.pdf [Accessed: 2nd July 2012].
6. R. Verkeer, H. De Groot and E.T. Verhoff, “Urban multifunctional land use: theoretical and empirical
insights on economies of scale, scope and diversity”, Built Environment 30 (4), pp. 289307, 2004.
https://doi.org/10.2148/benv.30.4.289.57157
7. H. Wiggering, et al., Indicators for multifunctional land use: Linking socio-economic requirements with
landscape potentials, Ecological Indicators (6) pp. 238249, 2006.
8. G.A. Wilson, Multifunctional Agriculture: A Transition Theory Perspective, CABI international,
Cambridge, MA, 2007.
9. OECD, Multifunctionality: a framework for policy analysis, AGR/CA (98) 9, OECD publications, Paris, 1998.
10. OECD, Multifunctionality: towards an analytical approach, OECD publications, Paris, 2001.
11. N., Elin, Integral Urbanism, Routledge, NY, 2006.
12. R. Fish, A. Church and M. Winter, “Conceptualising cultural ecosystem services: A novel framework for
research and critical engagement”, Ecosystem Services 21, pp.208-217, 2016.
13. G. Huylenbroeck et al., “Multifunctionality of Agriculture: A review of Definitions, Evidence and
Instruments”, Living Reviews in Landscape Research (1),p.3. 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.12942/lrlr-2007-3
14. J. Jacobs, The Death and Life of Great American Cities. Vantage, New York. 1961.
15. J. Živković, K. Lalović, and D. Milovanović-Rodić, Multifunkcionalnost otvorenih prostora u kontekstu
prilagođavanja gradova klimatskim promenama (Multifunctionality of Open Spaces in Adapting Cities
to Climate Change), In: M. Bajić-Brković (Ed.), Klimatske promene, nacionalne politike i lokalni razvoj
(Climate changes, national policies and local development) pp. 125-155. Faculty of Architecture
University of Belgrade, Belgrade, 2016.
16. S. Waters and M. Smith, “The Planning and management of urban open spaces in Scotland”, Scottish
Natural Heritage Review (SNH) No 130, 2002.
17. Council of Europe (2000) European Landscape Convention
18. L. Willemen, Mapping and Moddeling Multifunctional Landscapes, Thesis, Wageningen University,
Wageningen, The Nederlands, 2010.
19. R. Hine, J. Peacock and J. Pretty, Green spaces: Measuring the benefits, drawing on case studies from
the East of England. Report for the National Trust. University of Essex, 2008.
20. J. Živković, Uticaj ekoloških zahteva na oblikovanje otvorenih rekreativnih prostora u gradu (The
Impact of Ecological Demands on Design of Open Recreational Spaces in Urban Environment), MSC
Thesis, University of Belgrade Faculty of Architecture, Belgrade, 2000.
21. M. Bajić Brković, Ogledi o planiranju i održivom razvoju grada (Essays on planning and sustainable
development), Faculty of Architecture University of Belgrade (internal edition),, Belgrade, 2000.
22. Ž. Vesnić Neđeral, Rekreativna funkcija otvorenih prostora u gradu (Recreational function of urban open
spaces), Faculty of Architecture University of Belgrade, Belgrade, 1990.
23. J. Živković and N. Vasiljević, “Predeo i održivi prostorni razvoj Srbije” (Landscape and Sustainable
Spatial Developlent of Serbia). In: M. Bajić-Brković (Ed.), Kreativne strategije za održivi razvoj gradova
u Srbiji (Creative strategies for sustainable urban development in Serbia) (pp. 123-157). Univresity of
Belgrade Faculty of Architecture, Belgrade, 2010.
24. Z. Đukanović and J. Živković, Public Art & Public Space program: learning, but doing! ANNALES-
Anali za istrske in mediteranske studije-Series historia et sociologia. Vol. 25/1, pp. 49-65. 2015.
http://zdjp.si/annales-series-historia-et-sociologia-25-2015-1/
25. J. Corner, “Terra Fluxus”, in: Waldheim Ch. (ed.) The Landscape Urbanism Reader, (pp.21-33), NY:
Princeton Architectural Press, 2006.
26. R Kaufmann-Hayoy, T. Hammer and D. Raemy, “Institutional Steering and Collective Action for
Sustainable landscape Development - The Case of the Vineyard Landscape at the Lake of Biel”, 2007.
http: //www.ikaoe.unibe.ch/forschung/nie-bielersee/index.html [Accessed: 2nd July 2012].
Multifunctional Public Open Spaces for Sustainable Cities: Concept and Application 219
MULTIFUNKCIONALNI JAVNI OTVORENI PROSTORI
ZA ODRŽIVE GRADOVE: KONCEPT I PRIMENA
Ideja da je mutlifunkcionalnost otvorenih prostora važna za urbanu održivost se sve vise
naglašava u teoriji i sve češće primenjuje u praksi urbanog planiranja i dizajna. Pretpostavlja se
da multifunkcionalni prostori mogu da pruže širi spektar ekoloških, društvenih i ekonomskih
koristi. Međutim, sam concept multifunkcionalnosti nije dovoljno teoretski elaboriran. Dodatno,
različite akademske discipline konceptualizuju i koriste ovaj concept na različite načine. Usled
toga je otežana procena kako multifunkcionalni otvoreni prostori stvarno doprinose održivom
urbanom razvoju i kako ih razvijati sa tim ciljem. Ovim radom se, na osnovu pregleda literature,
analiziraju i porede načini konceptualizacije i primene koncepta multifunkcionalnosti prostora u
različitim displinama prostornog razvoja ( urbanističko planiranje i dizajn, pejzažno planiranje i
arhitektura) kako bi se razumele i uspostavile veze između različitih dimenzija multifunkcionalnosti
i očekivanih koristiod primene koncepta za održivi urbani razvoj. Na tim osnovama se definiše
nova relacijska i multidimenzionalna konceptualizacija (multi)funkcionalnosti javnih otvorenih
prostora kao analitički okvir za vrednovanje doprinosa projekata urbanog dizajna održivom
razvoju. Primena novog analitičkog okvira se demonstrira i diskutuje na primeru studentskih
projekata sa studija “Ekološki urbani dizajn” sa Univerziteta u Beogradu- Arhitektonskog fakultet,
kao vizija razvoja multifunkcionalnih javnih otvorenih prostora modernističkog kompleksa
“Savskih blokova” u Novom Beogradu u Srbiji.
Ključne reči: multifunkcionalnost, javni otvoreni proctori, održivi urbani razvoj, urbano planiranje
i dizajn
... • Sustainability: An important feature of a sustainable city and building is the provision of energy and resources; thus, mixed-use space can help develop a sustainable city and building. Inappropriate use of space is a waste of resources [7]. ...
... • Complex legal procedures and permits for the implementation of this type of facilities, particularly in places with planning laws and restrictions on structural density. Investors are therefore engaged in lengthy discussions to persuade the government [7]. For a free investor, the risk associated in reaching the model image of the centre without earning adequate returns is tough to incur, and here the economic concerns and the ratio between cost and gain reappear. ...
Article
Full-text available
The rapid and changing development of information technology and its significant impact on the centrality of urban services and functions, as well as the increasing population and urbanization of major cities in general and the city of Baghdad in particular, so it is necessary to know the role of such information in bringing about a positive change in these problems. The hypothesis of this research is based on the fact that ICT can take a new perspective on urban design, improve the functionality of existing urban spaces and thereby reduce the need to build new facilities while maintaining the quality of life in dense cities. The research aims to access the use of information technology to prepare urban centres capable of absorbing population expansion and urban pressure on current urban centres to prepare work indicators for a mixed-use space while maintaining and relieving the pressure of current urban centres by preparing mixed-use urban space within multiple urban centres in accordance with the review of global experiences and the role of informatics in creating a breakthrough in those spaces and urban centres. The research reaches a number of various indicators for the development of urban centres in Baghdad (The research directed at the development of the capital) as well as Iraqi provinces for the purpose of achieving some kind of community, economic and cultural justice, and relieving pressure on the capital.
... Spaces that can support more than one function and combine their uses in accordance with the needs and aspirations of society have great potential if properly managed [34,35]. In order to realize their full potential, the open public spaces surrounding small watercourses must be of high quality and successful in meeting the ecological, social, aesthetic and economic requirements, as well as being developed in accordance with the climate change mitigation and adaptation principles, measures and standards. ...
... These are all coordinated within the concept of quality open public spaces. This perspective aligns with current urban design research by recognizing the various roles of open public spaces [35,64,65]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Small urban watercourses, often neglected and underdeveloped, have the potential to become integrated parts of the network of urban open public spaces. In this process, urban design plays the key role in their functioning and resilience, strengthening their capacity as high-quality open spaces. The current principles and roles of urban design only partially meet the requirements in making these spaces resilient. This article questions the existing principles and roles of the current practice and proposes a different perspective on the urban design of open public spaces surrounding small urban watercourses, within a framework of socio-ecological resilience. The research consisted of two parts. In the first part, based on both the specific characteristics of the public open spaces surrounding small urban watercourses and discussions of their quality, framed by the concept of socio-ecological resilience, a set of attributes was developed that defined their quality. In the second part, this set was tested through a case study of the Kumodraz stream in Belgrade, Serbia and translated into responsive urban design guidelines in a specific context. This was supported by a pilot survey of 346 potential users of the location. The findings of the case study show that urban design occupies a redefined and very specific position in the revitalization process of open public spaces surrounding small urban watercourses. In addition to its fundamental role in increasing the capacity of spaces and creating high-quality open spaces, it also helps to establish an integrated approach to the revitalization of the spaces surrounding small urban watercourses in a local context.
... Inappropriate use of space is a waste of resources. [7]. ...
...  Complex legal procedures and permits for the implementation of this type of facilities, particularly in places with planning laws and restrictions on structural density. Investors are therefore engaged in lengthy discussions to persuade the government, [7]. ...
Research
Full-text available
The rapid and changing development of information technology and its significant impact on the centrality of urban services and functions, as well as the increasing population and urbanization of major cities in general and the city of Baghdad in particular, so it is necessary to know the role of such information in bringing about a positive change in these problems. The hypothesis of this research is based on the fact that ICT can take a new perspective on urban design, improve the functionality of existing urban spaces and thereby reduce the need to build new facilities while maintaining the quality of life in dense cities. The research aims to access the use of information technology to prepare urban centres capable of absorbing population expansion and urban pressure on current urban centres to prepare work indicators for a mixed-use space while maintaining and relieving the pressure of current urban centres by preparing mixed-use urban space within multiple urban centres in accordance with the review of global experiences and the role of informatics in creating a breakthrough in those spaces and urban centres. The research reaches a number of various indicators for the development of urban centres in Baghdad (The research directed at the development of the capital) as well as Iraqi provinces for the purpose of achieving some kind of community, economic and cultural justice, and relieving pressure on the capital.
... It is also worth noting the relatively small spread between the highest and lowest ratings of the frequency of satisfaction of needs in urban plazas (a difference of 1.08 points with 17 needs, giving an average distance between them of 0.06 points). The average frequencies of respondents' indications show that urban plazas are spaces where it is possible to satisfy various needs with similar frequency, which is related to their multi-functionality, as indicated by Harun, Zakariya, Mansor & Zakaria (2014) and Živković, Lalović, Milojević & Nikezić (2019). ...
Article
Full-text available
This research aims to investigate the relationship between humans and the physical area of their activity by identifying the needs of urban plaza users. The study used two research methods – IDI and CAWI survey. A total of 17 needs that are satisfied in urban plazas were identified. Analysis of the frequency of their satisfaction indicates that urban plazas are mainly recreational and leisure spaces. However, it is worth noting that the average ratings of how frequently individual needs were fulfilled differed insignificantly, indicating that urban plazas are highly multifunctional. At the same time, the frequency with which social needs were satisfied was rated relatively low. The survey results also suggest that the satisfied needs in urban plazas vary by gender and personality. The research points to generational changes that affect the fulfillment of differentiated needs depending on user age. A change in the “center of gravity” of the satisfied needs of young people relative to older users of urban plazas is observed.
... This does not mean that all study cities are responsive to the local conditions. According to Zivkovic et al., 2019, One of the major indicators that can be used to measure the sustainable urban development is inclusiveness and multifunctionality of urban open space. Therefore, the existing land use and environmental plan must consider the growing demand of the society and include the different section of residents to accommodate everyone. ...
Article
Full-text available
The rapid and uncontrolled urbanization in developing countries raises concerns about sustainability as urban centers continue to expand in both size and population. In 1950, only 28% of the global population lived in urban areas, a figure projected to surpass 68% by 2050. The ongoing urbanization pattern in developing countries, notably in Ethiopian urban centers, suggests a decline in the overall quality of existing green spaces. The intention of this study is to draw attention to the growing demand and considerable pressure on the existing urban open spaces of the target cities in the southern Ethiopian corridor. Therefore, this study seeks to examine the major challenges for open space development, which is essential for ensuring the long-term resilience of the sampled cities. Different methods were used to gather primary data, including face-to-face interviews with higher administrative authorities, questionnaires for residents with the Likert scale, and field observation. Statistical analysis, including descriptive statistics, was conducted using IBM SPSS 26 software. Research findings indicate that a large number of respondents (474 and 230) believe that current green public spaces do not account for future population growth, leading to inadequacy for both present and future generations. In addition, 478 respondents highlighted issues of inclusivity based on age, gender, and disability. A significant portion of the respondents (656 out of 1402) noted that existing open spaces are diminishing due to urban expansion and infill projects, which often lack community engagement input in urban planning and implementation. Despite these challenges, cities like Hawassa and Butajira are reportedly taking steps to incorporate green spaces into their city planning. It is recommended to manage urban expansion, promote participatory planning, and establish inclusive environments in order to develop resilient cities. Further investigation on this topic should analyze spatial and temporal changes using medium- and high-resolution spatial data.
Chapter
Full-text available
The idea of the importance of open public spaces for urban sustainability can be traced through numerous theoretical works published in leading journals and monographs by renowned global publishers. At the same time, the practical application of this concept in urban planning and design, whether for new or redeveloped public spaces, is highly significant. Local communities, planners, and residents have recognized the ecological, social, and economic importance of urban public spaces. This paper, based on a literature review, analyzes the significance of urban public spaces as places of encounter and interaction and as key factors in fostering social cohesion and identity, inclusivity, and community accessibility. The focus is primarily on the relationships between urban public spaces as elements of the physical structure and their interaction with the social aspects of public spaces. Spatial and design aspects, as well as potential issues faced by the community, are considered, problems are identified, and solutions are proposed. By studying innovative approaches and creative solutions for designing new or transforming existing urban public spaces into sustainable and multifunctional units that can support various activities and community needs, the sustainability of urban public spaces, safety, security, and a healthy living environment are enhanced. The paper proposes solutions for creating smart urban public spaces using new technologies to improve their spatial, ecological, and socio-economic value. These and other parameters of open urban public spaces are addressed in this paper.
Article
Full-text available
Public open spaces, such as squares, parks, and sports fields, serve as crucial hubs during and after disasters, fostering a sense of normalcy and community, promoting social cohesion, and facilitating community recovery. Additionally, they offer opportunities for promoting physical and mental well-being during such crises. This study aims to enhance the responsiveness of public open spaces to disasters by prioritizing disaster resilience in their planning and design. This study consists of two main stages. Firstly, a literature review is conducted to explore the current trends in research on public open space planning and design and the incorporation of disaster resilience. Results indicate that the primary focus of the current research on planning and designing public open spaces centers around sociocultural, psychological, environmental, and economic benefits. There is limited emphasis on integrating disaster resilience into public open space planning and design, leading to a lack of clear guidance for planners and architects. The emphasis on disaster resilience in public open space planning and design mainly began after 2010, with a notable increase observed in the last six years (2017-2023). This emphasis notably centers on climate change impacts, followed by floods, and then earthquakes. Secondly, drawing on the pivotal role of public open spaces during disasters, the importance of urban planning and design, and the existing gap in incorporating disaster resilience in current research on public open space planning and design, this study develops a novel framework for enhancing public open spaces' responsiveness to disasters through resilient urban planning and design, based on four main disaster resilience criteria: multifunctionality, efficiency, safety, and accessibility. The insights gleaned from this study offer invaluable guidance to planners, architects, and decision-makers, empowering them to develop public open spaces that can effectively respond to various circumstances, ultimately contributing to bolstering community resilience and sustainability.
Article
Full-text available
Old community districts grapple with issues such as antiquated infrastructure and functional designs that fail to meet contemporary needs. These limitations lead to diminished disaster resistance and a reduced quality of life for inhabitants. Public spaces within these antiquated districts can function as sanctuaries during calamities, enhancing the community’s disaster response efficacy and expediting post-disaster recovery, which is vital for effective disaster management. Nevertheless, the disaster-resilience attributes of public spaces in these old districts have not been sufficiently researched. This study focused on three representative old communities in Beijing, analyzing and contrasting their disaster resilience attributes and various community types. Utilizing the Analytic Hierarchy Process, a hierarchical structural model was formulated, examining the public spatial structure, function, transportation, and ecology. A comprehensive analysis was then conducted to identify the resilience characteristics that public spaces in old communities should possess. The findings indicated that the prioritization of the four criteria—ecological space, transit space, spatial function, and spatial structure—in the development of disaster-resilient public spaces in communities increases progressively. The renovation to increase the disaster-resilience of old communities should concentrate on optimizing the spatial structure layout of the community, enhancing the integrity, openness, and coherence of public spaces; imbuing public spaces with versatile and multifaceted functions, and establishing hierarchical distribution systems; ensuring transit spaces cater to both everyday use and disaster exigencies, maintaining unimpeded traffic flow under all conditions; and creating multi-tiered ecological spaces to bolster resilience during disasters while enhancing daily aesthetics. This research enriches the strategies for the disaster-resilient renovation of public spaces in old communities, offering precise and scientific references to improve community disaster resilience and emergency response capabilities.
Conference Paper
Hybridization in urban planning and architecture is linked to the notions of multifunctionality and flexibility of space. It implies combining various urban structures, programs, and activities that create complex spaces. Existing theoretical discourses do not enable complex understanding of hibridization in relation to its application in the design of public urban spaces. The aim of this paper is to define the concept of hybridization and analyze the purpose and ways of its application in urban design. Using hybrid public spaces from practice, the modalities are identified, as well as the impact on the quality of public spaces, intensification of social activity, etc. The results indicate that its role can be regenerative, binding, and integrating.
Article
Full-text available
The construction of culture as a class of ecosystem service presents a significant test of the holistic ambitions of an ecosystems approach to decision making. In this paper we explore the theoretical challenges arising from efforts to understand ecosystems as objects of cultural concern and consider the operational complexities associated with understanding how, and with what consequences, knowledge about cultural ecosystem services are created, communicated and accounted for in real world decision making. We specifically forward and develop a conceptual framework for understanding cultural ecosystem services and related benefits in terms of the environmental spaces and cultural practices that arise from interactions between humans and ecosystems. The types of knowledge, and approaches to knowledge production, presumed by this relational, non-linear and place-based perspective on cultural ecosystem services are discussed and reviewed. The framework not only helps navigate more fully the challenge of operationalising ‘cultural ecosystem services’ but points to a more relational understanding of the ecosystem services framework as a whole. Extending and refining understanding through more ambitious engagements in interdisciplinarity remains important.
Article
Full-text available
Places of globalisation often turn out to be mono functional places. Airports, shopping malls and business districts seem to evolve towards privatised, controlled and regulated spaces. As a possible counterforce, the normative planning concept of multiple intensive land use is introduced in this paper: planning to create integrated spaces with a mixture of uses. The case study is the Amsterdam Zuidas. This location, at the fringe of Amsterdam around a major transportation hub and close to the international airport, provided excellent conditions for prime office developments in the last years. However, the ambition of the city of Amsterdam is to strive for a mixed -use program at the site, reflected by a combination of uses (offices, housing, culture, retail). This paper presents a theoretical framework to study practices of interaction around the Zuidas project and two other case studies, the Forum 2004 project in Barcelona and the Ørestad project in Copenhagen. It will state that without norms that help converging the action of individual actors into integrated projects, ambitions for multiple intensive land use will fail in practice. Norms and their evolving character are crucial to understand how a promising concept of multiple intensive land use can be embedded in practices. This topic is part of a PhD research project that I am currently conducting at the University of Amsterdam. This study applies an institutional framework to investigate how norms - that structurally influence orientations of actors in practices - hamper or promote the concept of multiple intensive land use. It shows how innovative practices can influence norms to realize a successful application of the concept.
Article
Full-text available
A recent planning device aimed at dealing with land scarcity is the propagation of multifunctional land use. This paper describes the evolution of urban planning concepts and their links to economic theory. We argue that the most distinctive feature of multifunctional land use is its emphasis on return to diversity. This concept is rooted in the modern economic theory of agglomeration. Empirical evidence is shown to provide some support for the quantitative relevance of return to diversity, but is still to a large extent in its infancy. More evidence is required for policy purposes aimed at identifying the optimal extent to which multifunctional land use projects have to be pursued.
Article
Full-text available
During the last few decades mixed-use development has become an important planning paradigm in various European and North American cities. However, the concept of mixed-use is ambiguous in both theory and practice. In this paper a typology of mixed-use developments is revealed to identify its major components. This typology is then applied to the case study area Eastern Docklands in Amsterdam which is a major urban transformation area in which the concept of mixed-use development has been implemented. It is concluded that in this area there is a good deal of mixing between housing and employment, but it is still unclear whether the strategic goals are reached.
Article
Full-text available
In this paper, we define measures of urban diversity, density and segregation using new data and software systems based on GIS. These allow us to visualise the meaning of the multifunctional city. We begin with a discussion of how cities have become more segregated in their land uses and activities during the last 200 years and how the current focus is on reversing this trend through limiting urban sprawl and bringing new life back to the inner and central city. We define various indices which show how diversity and density manifest themselves spatially. We argue that multifunctionalism is a relative concept, dependent upon the spatial and temporal scale that we use to think about the mixing and concentration of urban land uses. We present three examples using spatially smoothed indicators of diversity: for a world city – London, for a highly controlled polycentric urban region – Randstad Holland, and for a much more diffusely populated semi-urban region – Venice-Padua-Teviso. We conclude by illustrating that urban diversity varies as people engage in different activities associated with different land uses throughout the day, as well as through the vertical, third dimension of the city. This impresses the point that we need to understand multifunctional cities in all their dimensions of space and time.
Chapter
This chapter focuses on the issues in current city planning and rebuilding. It describes the principles and aims that have shaped modern, orthodox city planning and rebuilding. The chapter shows how cities work in real life, because this is the only way to learn what principles of planning and what practices in rebuilding can promote social and economic vitality in cities, and what practices and principles will deaden these attributes. In trying to explain the underlying order of cities, the author uses a preponderance of examples from New York. The most important thread of influence starts, more or less, with Ebenezer Howard, an English court reporter for whom planning was an avocation. Howard's influence on American city planning converged on the city from two directions: from town and regional planners on the one hand, and from architects on the other.
Article
In a time of great agricultural and rural change, the notion of 'multifunctionality' has remained under-theorized and poorly linked to wider debates in the social sciences. This book analyses the extent to which the proposed transition towards post-productivist agriculture holds up to scientific scrutiny, and proposes a modified productivist/non-productivist model that better encapsulates the complexity of agricultural and rural change. By combining existing notions and concepts, this book (re)conceptualizes agricultural change, creating a new transition theory, and a new way of looking at the future of agriculture.
Article
Indicators to assess sustainable land development often focus on either economic or ecologic aspects of landscape use. The concept of multifunctional land use helps merging those two focuses by emphasising on the rule that economic action is per se accompanied by ecological utility: commodity outputs (CO, e.g., yields) are paid for on the market, but non-commodity outputs (NCO, e.g., landscape aesthetics) so far are public goods with no markets.Agricultural production schemes often provided both outputs by joint production, but with technical progress under prevailing economic pressure, joint production increasingly vanishes by decoupling of commodity from non-commodity production.Simultaneously, by public and political awareness of these shortcomings, there appears a societal need or even demand for some non-commodity outputs of land use, which induces a market potential, and thus, shift towards the status of a commodity outputs.An approach is presented to merge both types of output by defining an indicator of social utility (SUMLU): production schemes are considered with respect to social utility of both commodity and non-commodity outputs. Social utility in this sense includes environmental and economic services as long as society expresses a demand for them. For each combination of parameters at specific frame conditions (e.g., soil and climate properties of a landscape) a production possibility curve can reflect trade-offs between commodity and non-commodity outputs. On each production possibility curve a welfare optimum can be identified expressing the highest achievable value of social utility as a trade-off between CO and NCO production.When applying more parameters, a cluster of welfare optimums is generated. Those clusters can be used for assessing production schemes with respect to sustainable land development.Examples of production possibility functions are given on easy applicable parameters (nitrogen leaching versus gross margin) and on more complex ones (biotic integrity).Social utility, thus allows to evaluate sustainability of land development in a cross-sectoral approach with respect to multifunctionality.
Article
In this contribution we try to look at the new role for agriculture in rural areas by reviewing the concept of multifunctional agriculture as well as the analytical frameworks used. Next, we review the existing evidence about the multifunctional role of farming. Although not overwhelming, the existing literature shows that agriculture contributes to the rural wealth not only through the production of commodities, but also by the delivery of non-tradable goods. This contribution can be both direct through increased values for properties or economic benefits in the tourism sector, but also indirect through conservation of rural heritage or agri-ecological systems. Next we focus on how this role of agriculture can be stimulated. It is argued that multifunctionality can be a unifying principle to bring the productive and non-productive functions into harmony. This requires the development of new institutional arrangements and a major change in policy incentives.
MILU Guide: practitioners handbook for multifunctional intensive land use, MILU net -The Habiforum Fondation, Gouda
  • H Haccou
H. Haccou, et al, MILU Guide: practitioners handbook for multifunctional intensive land use, MILU net -The Habiforum Fondation, Gouda, 2007.