Conference Paper

İnşaat Şirketleri İçin Bir Proje Portföy Yönetim Aracı: COPPMAN

To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.


Günden güne gelişmekte olan inşaat sektöründe projeler giderek karmaşık bir hal almakta, bu gelişimin doğal bir sonucu olarak da inşaat şirketleri birden çok projeyi eş zamanlı yürütmek durumunda kalmaktadır. Bu kapsamda, şirketlerin geleneksel yönetim teknikleri yerine, bütüncül bir yönetim anlayışı sunan portföy yönetimini benimsemeleri gereği doğmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, bu amaca hizmet etmek üzere geliştirilmiş olan bir portföy yönetim aracı (COPPMAN) sunulmaktadır. Aracın geliştirilmesi amacıyla proje portföy yönetimi alanında literatür taraması yapılmış ve portföy yönetimi anlayışının inşaat şirketlerine adapte edilmesi sağlanmıştır. Bu kapsamda geliştirilen araç, şirketlerin kurumsal belleklerini de kullanarak; şirket için uygun olan portföy seçiminin, şirket stratejisine, portföy düzeyinde risk ve karlılığa göre yapılmasını sağlayabilecek bir portföy yönetim sistemi sunmaktadır. Buna ek olarak, araç proje ilişkilerine ve portföyün özelliklerine göre yönetim önerileri sunabilmektedir. Aracın büyük ölçekli inşaat şirketlerinin portföy yönetimlerine yardımcı olacağı, böylelikle şirketlerin yönetim anlayışının tekil projelerin başarısından şirket başarısına yönelebileceği düşünülmektedir. Bu doğrultuda araç şirketler için uygun portföylerin oluşturulması ve etkin bir şekilde yönetilmesini sağlayabilecek ve şirketlerin rekabet avantajı kazanması mümkün olabilecektir.

No full-text available

Request Full-text Paper PDF

To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the authors.

ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Full-text available
Regarding to the high importance of project selection in the project life cycle, solving bid/no-bid problems, especially in the construction industry, is a subject of most recent research. Portfolio selection has been the most interesting area in the last two decades in management research but there is poor investigation in the construction industry. Taking into account the risk, which is inherent in the construction industry and especially in the project selection phase is inevitable. This paper intends to propose a model for project selection and developing two main concepts including company portfolio and risk. The main innovation of this paper is presenting a new framework, which attempts to optimize project selection based on the endurable risk level of a company with regard to the existing portfolio. Considering the user-friendly characteristic of the model, this paper has applied the fuzzy multi criteria decision-making approaches. Finally, the model is implemented in a real case study.
Full-text available
Effective portfolio management is vital to successful product innovation. Portfolio management is about making strategic choices—which markets, products, and technologies our business will invest in. It is about resource allocation—how you will spend your scarce engineering, R&D, and marketing resources. It focuses on project selection—on which new product or development projects you choose from the many opportunities you face. And it deals with balance—having the right balance between numbers of projects you do and the resources or capabilities you have available.
Conference Paper
The application of portfolio management is increasing in large organizations as they are more inclined to manage several small construction projects instead of a few mega-projects. A detailed survey launched to the members of the Construction Industry Institute and Construction Management Association of America showed that the majority of owner organizations do not have systematic approaches to form their portfolios. They usually rank candidate projects using one criterion such as net present value or internal rate of return and then select projects based on their ranks considering the budget constraints. Given the complex nature of businesses, many other criteria (geography, politics, strategic objective, competitors, construction related risks, etc.) can play a role in determining the importance of a project to the organization’s long-term plans. In this research, a framework is designed to help the owners of large construction programs form balanced project portfolios in terms of business lines, project types, and construction risks. Several criteria in different areas of finance, economy, and safety for ranking projects are identified using a comprehensive literature review and a detailed industry survey. A multicriteria decision-making method, PROMETHEE, is identified as a suitable method for ranking projects due to its flexibility in normalizing the differences between the criteria of competing alternatives and providing consistent results. This framework is illustrated through a case study.
With a series of new energy construction projects of China in full swing, such as 10 million kilowatt wind power base, solar photovoltaic power generation clean energy base, the new rural biomass energy projects and nuclear power development and construction projects, the major power generation groups, as well as the investors represented by private capital, take this opportunity to have entered the field of new energy construction. The number of new energy projects increases, each investor is bound to be faced with the problems of portfolio and investment decisions of Item sets, as well as the problems of allocation of resources and optimized combination of multiple projects in the process of building at the same time. Traditional single-project management includes the management content such as project scope, time, cost, quality, risks and so on, while project portfolio management exceeds the boundaries of the traditional project management and combines the project implementation and business strategy as a bridge between corporate projects and strategies. From the view of project portfolio selection, optimal assessment, resource optimization and so on, the article introduced the methods and models of the major aspects of the portfolio management of the new energy projects.
Project portfolio management is central to many organizations' strategic processes and requires consideration of multiple factors and the ability to envision alternative future consequences to support strategic project portfolio decision making. Complex project portfolios with multiple project interdependencies are characteristic of many project environments, yet existing methods do not provide the clear understanding of project interdependencies that is required.This exploratory study aims to improve organizational understanding of project interdependencies through two loosely coupled avenues of investigation conducted in tandem in a telecommunications and a defense organization. The first avenue of research introduces a new type of visual representation and shows that the creation of graphical network displays of projects and their interdependencies can provide benefits by supporting communication and strategic portfolio decision making. The second avenue of research tests a conceptual model and highlights the importance of both the culture and processes in an organization's understanding of project interdependencies.
Purpose – Typically, organizations tumble with project management, and failure rates are high. Usually, one key factor in establishing a manageable and successful project portfolio is to take into account interdependencies between different projects (resources, technology and market). With an increasing amount of international cross-border project activity, it is vital to know how different countries manage interdependencies, and how management practices differ between countries. Design/methodology/approach – This research bases its empirical findings on a large-scale questionnaire completed during 2007-2008 in Estonia and Finland. Altogether, 288 responses were gained, and roughly two-thirds of the answers originated from Finland and one-thirds from Estonia. Respondents were industrial and service companies. Findings – The results of the survey indicate similarities and some significant differences between Estonian and Finnish responses. Some country size and context-dependent hypotheses were not supported or only weakly supported, indicating great homogeneity between managerial issues of interdependency internationally. However, existing significant differences may stem from historical and cultural reasons, such as, peculiarities of transition country compared to mature country. Research limitations/implications – The main limitation arises from the analyzed sample, which was mostly limited to information and communication technologies, engineering, machinery and construction industries and thus the findings may not be directly applicable to other industries. Because responses originate only from two Finno-Ugrian countries, this limits the generalizability of the research results directly into other regions and countries. Practical implications – Managing interdependencies between projects has a clear practical significance, and it appears in companies in both of the countries in the form of bringing additional value, saving costs and in increasing the success rate of projects. In addition, international project owners can find differences in their daily work. Originality/value – This research provides empirical evidence for the less investigated, but emerging field of interdependency phenomenon of project management. To the authors' knowledge, no research to date concerns cross-country comparison.
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to show how interdependencies are used to make the project selection and review more effective in project portfolio management. Managers need to make appropriate pre-evaluation of disciplines before taking them into use, therefore it is useful to know how much interdependencies can increase the success rate of projects and how big is the resource reduction from the use of interdependencies. This paper is an excerpt of a larger interdependency survey. Design/methodology/approach – A large-scale survey is carried out in two countries – Estonia and Finland. A total of 288 responses were received. Findings – People see only positive aspects in interdependencies, but this paper proves that it is not always so. It is found that companies which take the phenomenon into account are more successful. Contrary to the respondents' perception and prior literature, a higher need for resources is noticed among the users of interdependency. The results indicate homogeneity between managerial issues of interdependencies in small-to-large companies. Research limitations/implications – The main limitation comes from the sample, as findings from the sample countries and industries may limit generalizability. Practical implications – Practitioners can expect a higher success rate and resource consumption from interdependencies. Managers from small-to-large companies can find size-related peculiarities and practices for their daily managerial actions. Originality/value – This paper provides empirical evidence for a less investigated, but emerging field of interdependencies. So far, mostly components of interdependency have been investigated in isolation. The paper highlights the behavior of success rate and resource consumption among the users/non-users of interdependency, which to the author's knowledge has not been provided so far.
Construction management research and practice is dominated by a single project paradigm. This does not reflect the true nature of many construction clients who have large multi-project portfolios. Traditional single project management strategies are usually adopted for managing such portfolios - with limited success. The literature suggests that programmes, within portfolios, require different forms of management in order to optimize project delivery. In order to better understand these portfolios and thereby allow the exploration of new forms of management, a typology has been developed mapping out the various features of client's construction portfolios. The resultant typology provides a simple method for identifying the programme composition of a portfolio, highlighting the expected features of each programme type, and thereby directing management attention to the main aspects of each programme that can be optimized for efficiency. Six cases of client's construction project portfolios were studied using a highly structured, replication logic, case study methodology. A typology of clients' multi-project environments was developed and validated through literal and theoretical replication between cases. Three main types emerged as descriptive of programmes within client's construction portfolios: bounded programmes, target programmes and rolling programmes. The distinctive features of each type suggest that programme-specific approaches may be necessary for the successful delivery of projects within client's construction portfolios.
Software Testing: Concepts and Practices
  • K Mustafa
  • R A Khan
Mustafa, K. ve Khan, R. A. (2007). Software Testing: Concepts and Practices, Alpha Science International Ltd., Oxford, UK.
A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge
Project Management Institute. (2008). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge, 4 th edition, Project Management Institute Inc., Newton Square, PA.
The Standard for Portfolio Management
Project Management Institute. (2013). The Standard for Portfolio Management, 3 rd edition, Project Management Institute Inc., Newton Square, PA.