Content uploaded by Meschack Muanda
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Meschack Muanda on Dec 31, 2019
Content may be subject to copyright.
International Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences (IJEAS)
ISSN: 2394-3661, Volume-6, Issue-7, July 2019
26 www.ijeas.org
Abstract— Copper and cobalt are two major metals used in
industry. They play a role in widely many domains like that
electricity, chemistry and electrochemistry. They are contained
into several minerals like chalcopyrite, carrolite, chalcocite, etc.
associated to pyrite. The froth flotation and behaviors of
chalcocite and carrolite were investigated through many
flotation tests in order to recovery copper and cobalt. This paper
investigates the effect of potassium amyl xanthate (PAX) and
sodium dibutyl dithiophosphate (DANA) performance on both
copper and cobalt recovery in single roughing flotation. The
effect of pH on the flotation is proposed. Some parameters were
kept constant such as particle size d80=75 μm, pulp density 10%
solids, impeller speed 1300 rpm, and PAX doses of DANA (105
g/t per each) as collectors, dose of DF250 (5 drops) as frother,
dose of Na2SiO3 (200 g/t) as dispersant and depressant. Only the
pulp pH was varied from the natural pH to 11, using Ca(OH)2 as
regulator. According to results, PAX (105 g/t) was found as the
best collector for recovery of copper both at natural pH and
pH=11. At natural pH, the concentrate was found at 16.1%
copper recovery with a yield of 99.63%. At pH=11, the
concentrate was found at 16.1% copper recovery with a yield of
99.05%. For the recovery of cobalt, DANA (105 g/t) was found
better as the collector at natural pH producing a concentrate at
0.51% cobalt recovery yield of 76.48%. At pH=11, PAX (105
g/t) was found better as the collector. The concentrate was found
at 0.91% cobalt with a recovery yield of 85.13%.
Index Terms— cobalt, copper, dithiophosphate, flotation,
xanthate.
I. INTRODUCTION
The evolution of technology has led the development of
several mining techniques for base metals that are most used.
Copper and cobalt are part and are contained in the oxidized
minerals, sulphide or mixed. They are used in several
disciplines: electricity, robotics, battery manufacturing, metal
alloys, machine building, and the list is not exhaustive [5], [9],
[11], [19].
Copper is a strategic metal and its demand is growing rapidly
[15]. Cobalt has also a great role for the growth of humans,
animals and plants. However, it cannot be taken to avoid
excessively toxic effects. [17]. Copper-cobalt ore from
copper and cobalt come from the Central African Copper Belt
in the Democratic Republic of Congo and Zambia.
Copper sulfide minerals are chalcopyrite CuFeS2, chalcocite
CuS2, bornite Cu5FeS4. Cobalt sulfide minerals are cobaltine
Meschack Muanda Mukunga, Department of Chemical and
Metallurgical Engineering, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg,
South Africa
(CoAsS), carrollite (Cu (Co.Ni)2S4) and linneite (Co3S4).
These minerals are accompanied by pyrite, which is a great
source of iron [3], [4].
Several studies on the treatment of copper-cobalt minerals
were conducted and-have shown that at pH (about 4), the
flotation of cobalt from sulfide already is best using xanthate
collector. When using nitrosonaphthol chelating reagents, the
flotation of cobalt oxides from already is best at the pH of
about 7.5 [4].
The flotation foam of a mineral sulphide Cu-Co produce a
Cu-Co bulk concentrate. During the flotation, Cu-Co float at
natural pH or pH 11 using xanthate or dithiophosphate. This
occurs when the copper mineralization as chalcocite.
Thereafter separating copper and cobalt in the bulk
concentrate is done by raising the pH to at least 11, which
depresses the cobalt minerals. It has been shown that
xanthates float better the cobalt minerals at pH=11 and
dithiophosphates do at natural pH [4].
In this study, we collected samples in the mine of Kalukuluku
in Lubumbashi in the Democratic Republic of Congo.
Chalcocite is abundant copper mineral and carrolite is
abundant mineral cobalt. For flotation tests, potassium
amylxanthate (PAX: C5H11OCS2Na) family of xanthates and
sodium amyl dithiophosphate (DANA:C8H18O2PS2Na)
family dithiophosphates were used as collectors.
Polypropylene glycol methyl ether (Dowfroth 250: DF250)
was used as foaming and sodium silicate (Na2SiO3) as
depressing and dispersant. Slaked lime (Ca(OH)2) was used
as a pH regulator. The latter was varied keeping all other
parameters constant: particle size, pulp density, impeller
speed, reagents doses (PAX, DF250).
Flotation kinetics was treated for study the variation of the
cumulative recovery of a component (copper and cobalt)
proportionally to flotation time [18], as a time-rate recovery
process.
II. MATERIALS AND METHODS
A. Sample
The ore sample on which we worked was from mine of
Kalukuluku in Lubumbashi in the Democratic Republic of
Congo. It has been crushed in a laboratory jaw crusher
(primary) and then in a cylindrical laboratory crusher
(secondary) to have a size <1.7 mm. We collected 25 kg for
the result of our tests. The X-ray diffraction analysis revealed
the presence of chalcopyrite CuFeS2, of chalcocite Cu2S and
Carrolite CuCo2S4 as sulphides. The matrix was made of
quartz SiO2, Dolomite CaMg(CO3)2, Feldspar AlSi3O8 and
talc Mg3Si4O10(OH)2. After analysis by atomic-absorption
ICP, the contents of Table 1 have been revealed.
Recovery of copper and cobalt in the comparative
flotation of a sulfide ore using xanthate and
dithiophosphate as collectors
Meschack Muanda Mukunga
Recovery of copper and cobalt in the comparative flotation of a sulfide ore using xanthate and dithiophosphate as
collectors
27 www.ijeas.org
Table 1: Chemical analysis of the sample by AAS/ICP
Elements
Contents (%)
CuT
3.57
CuOx
0.4
CoT
0.39
Coox
0.01
Fe
2.94
Mn
0.13
Ca
9,765
B. Reagents
PAX and DANA were used as collectors and have been
prepared at 1% by dissolving 1 g in 100 ml of water. Na2SiO3
was used as depressing and dispersant and was prepared at
30% by dissolving 30 g in 100 ml of water. Ca(OH)2 as a pH
regulator was prepared at 20% by dissolving 20 g of CaO in
100 ml water. DF250 has been used as frother. Tap water was
used for the flotation tests. Equation (1) was used for the
passage of g/t to ml for each reagent.
(1)
C. Equipment
The following equipment was used: a laboratory mill
(length: 260 mm, diameter: 180 mm, rotation speed: 100
rpm), a flotation machine DENVER, flotation cell of 2.5 L,
panels, an VIBRA electronic balance, graduated vessels for
reagents, a pH meter, a propipette, a wash bottle of 1 liter, a
pallet.
D. Grinding
1 kg of sample was mixed with 1 l of water in the mill with
50% solids into the mill. This grinding was carried out at
different times 15, 20 and 25 minutes respectively. The pulp
from the mill was placed on a sieve of 75 μm and then the
refusing was oven dried and weighed. According to Fig. 1,
grinding curve was plotted by varying the refusing 75-μm size
vs time.
Fig.1: Grinding curve’s ore of Kalukuluku
For our flotation tests, we had considered 20% of refusing on
the sieve of 75 μm. And in view of Fig. 1, 18 minutes of
grinding has been required.
E. Flotation test
Before the flotation tests in single roughing, pH meter has
been calibrated. The ore was ground for 18 minutes. The pulp
was placed into the flotation cell of 2.5 L. Having lowered the
rotor into the pulp, we operated the operation at 1300 rpm.
We added Na2SiO3 conditioned for 3 minutes and Ca(OH)2
for pH regulation. Note that have worked at natural pH and
pH 11. Then collector (45 g/t) and frother (5 drops) were
added conditioned for 2 minutes. After that, we opened the air
valve at 5 L per min and collected concentrates in fractions of
0.5; 0.5; 1; 1; 2; 2 and 2 minutes respectively. The first 4
fractions were made the head concentrate. All concentrates
and tailings were sent to the laboratory for chemical analysis
by AAS-ICP to determine the amounts of copper and cobalt.
The 60 g/t corresponding to the remaining collector were
added after the recollections fractions coming after the first,
during a conditioning time of one minute. The flotation
kinetics was also evaluated for comparison between PAX and
DANA in recovery of copper and cobalt, using the variation
of constant rate vs time. The flotation scheme in simple
roughing is shown by the Fig. 2.
Fig.2: Diagram of single roughing flotation tests
III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
A. Variations recovery vs time and grade vs time
Fig. 2 was used to study concerned variations by changing
every time the pH using Ca(OH)2. We worked in at natural pH
and pH=11. The other parameters were kept constant: d80=75
μm, PAX (105 g/t), DF250 (5 drops), pulp density 10% solids
and impeller speed of 1300 rpm. The pulp produced by
milling for 18 minutes was placed in 2.5 L. Ca(OH)2 was
added (only to adjust pH to 11), PAX and DF250 was added
conditioned for 5 minutes. Then the air intake was introduced
at 5 L per min. Finally, concentrates and tailings were
collected, sent to laboratory for analysis by ICP-AAS to
determine grades of copper and cobalt, as well as recovery
yields.
1) Variations for copper
Figs. 3 and 4 show results of recovery and grade of copper
vs time at different pH values.
By comparison with the results of Fig. 3 and 4, we note that at
natural pH, copper recovery is fast with DANA until the fifth
minute. After the fifth minute, recovery of copper with PAX is
better and gives a concentrate at 16.1% with a yield of
99.63%. At pH 11, the curve of the PAX is better than DANA,
giving a concentrate at 16.1% copper with a yield of 99.05%.
Thus, the copper recovery is quick at natural pH with the
DANA until the fifth minute. After the fifth minute of
flotation, the PAX is better. At pH=11, PAX have a good
selectivity.
International Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences (IJEAS)
ISSN: 2394-3661, Volume-6, Issue-7, July 2019
28 www.ijeas.org
Fig.3 : Variation of copper’s grade vs time at different pH
values
Fig.4 : Variation of copper’s recovery vs time at different pH
values
These results confirmed that the flotation by PAX is steady in
an alkaline medium condition [16].
2) Variations for cobalt
Figs. 5 and 6 show results of recovery and grade of cobalt vs
time at different pH values.
Fig.5 : Variation of cobalt’s grade vs time at different pH
values
According to Fig. 5 and 6, we observe that at natural pH,
selectivity of DANA is higher than selectivity of PAX. Cobalt
recoveries for both collectors are almost the same to the third
minute and beyond the third minute, the growth recovery is
more pronounced for DANA than for PAX.
Thus, with DANA, we obtain a concentrate at 0.51% cobalt
at a yield of 76.48%. With PAX, 1.13% cobalt concentrate is
obtained with a yield of 47.37%.
At pH=11, PAX is largely better from the beginning to the end
of cobalt recovery. It gives a concentrate at 0.91% cobalt with
a yield of 85.18%, it is most selective.
Fig.6 : Variation of cobalt recovery vs time at different pH
values
At pH=11, PAX is largely better from the beginning to the end
of cobalt recovery. It gives a concentrate at 0.91% cobalt with
a yield of 85.18%, it is most selective. This confirms the study
[14] who said that the alkaline pH depresses pyrite in the
presence of xanthates, increasing the selectivity of the used
collector.
B. Determination of flotation rate constant
Several authors have investigated the first order flotation
kinetics models [1], [6], [8], [10], [12]-[13]. Among those
models, the classic model is investigated for our study and
according to this model; we have calculated the first order rate
constant k from equation (2).
[2] and [7] have shown that the flotation kinetics studies the
quantitative variation of the recovery R of the floatable
mineral in concentrate vs time t.
(2)
where is the maximum recovery achievable or the
cumulative recovery at time infinite (%), is the recovery at
time t (%), k is the first order rate constant (s-1), t is the
flotation time (s). After developing the formula (2), we obtain
equation (3).
(3)
In the case of our study, we evaluate the variation of the factor
vs flotation time to find the rate constant k,
both for copper and cobalt.
1) For copper
According to Fig. 7, at natural pH, the flotation rate constant
is better by DANA till the 5th minute and after that, the
flotation rate by PAX increased till the end of flotation. At
pH=11, the flotation rate is largely best by PAX than by
DANA. In copper recovery, the rate flotation constant is
higher by PAX at natural pH (0.634 s-1) and pH=11 (0.443
s-1). Another very important observation concerning PAX is
that its faster kinetics in the recovery of copper both at natural
pH and at pH=11.
Fig.7 : Determination of rate constant in flotation of copper at
different pH values
In both the values of pH, the first order rate constant for
copper recovery by PAX was found to be higher than that by
DANA.
2) For cobalt
Fig. 8 shows that the rate flotation constant is better by
DANA at natural pH and by PAX at pH=11 from the
Recovery of copper and cobalt in the comparative flotation of a sulfide ore using xanthate and dithiophosphate as
collectors
29 www.ijeas.org
beginning to the end of flotation. Another confirmation is that
the rate flotation constant increases rapidly after the third
minute by DANA at natural pH.
Fig.8 : Determination of rate constant in flotation of cobalt at
different pH values
In cobalt recovery, the rate flotation constant is higher by
DANA at natural pH (0.172 s-1) and by PAX at pH=11 (0.203
s-1).
IV. CONCLUSION
This study was intended to compare the selectivity and
kinetics of PAX and DANA in recovery of copper and cobalt
from a sulfide Copper-Cobalt ore. Keeping the particle size,
pulp density, impeller speed, and reagents doses as constant
parameters, only the pH was varied from the natural and
pH=11. At natural pH, PAX was given the good results for the
recovery of copper obtaining a concentrate of 16,1% with a
yield of 99,63% and a flotation rate constant of 0,634 s-1. For
the recovery of cobalt, DANA was found as better collector
obtaining a concentrate of 0.51% with a yield of 76.48% and a
flotation rate constant of 0,172 s-1. At pH=11, PAX was found
as the better collector for the recovery of both copper and
cobalt obtaining concentrates of 16,1% Cu and 0,91% Co
respectively. The flotation yields were 99,05% and 85,18%
respectively. Flotation rate constants were 0,443 s-1 and 0,203
s-1 respectively. According to these results, it is clearly shown
that at both natural pH and pH=11, the kinetic of copper
recovery is better by PAX than by DANA. However, for the
kinetic of cobalt, DANA is better than PAX at natural pH. It is
therefore recommended that a kinetic study be further
undertaken in acidic conditions.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Authors thank the company Chemical of Africa that has
opened the doors for the samples and the laboratory.
REFERENCES
[1] A. Agar, G. E. Chia, and C. L. Requis. (1988). Flotation rate
measurements to optimize an operating circuit. Minerals Engineering,
11(4), 347–360
[2] I. Bobin and N. Petrovskaya. (2008). Usage of inertial model of 1st
order with delay for analysis of kinetics of flotation.
[3] S. M. Bulatovic, C. J. Ferron, and W. T. Yen. (1992, August 2–6).
Development and Plant Application of New Collector for Oxide
Copper/Cobalt Ore Flotation for Gecamines, Zaire Flotation Plants,
Copper 92, Ottawa.
[4] S.M. Bulatovic. “Handbook of Flotation Reagents, Chemistry, Theory
and Practice: Flotation of Sulfide Ores”, Elsevier Science &
Technology Books, Vol.1, 2007, pp. 5-31, 105–109, 177–178,
235-239.
[5] W. L. Cornell and D. C. Holtgrefe. (1989). Continuous Flotation
Testing to Recover a Bulk Sulfide Concentrate from Missouri Lead Ore
Tailings, U.S. Bur. Mines, Rl 9265.
[6] E. C. Dowling, R. R. Klimpel and F. F. Aplan, (1985). Model
discrimination in the flotation of a porphyry copper ore. Minerals and
Metallurgical Processing, 2(2), 87–101
[7] M. Gharai and R. Venugopal. (2016). Modeling of flotation
process-An overview of different approaches. Mineral Processing and
Extractive Metallurgy Review, Vol. 37, N°2, pp. 120–133.
[8] C. J. Jameson, S. Nam and M. M. Young. (1977). Physical factors
affecting recovery rates in flotation. Miner. Sci. Eng., Vol. 9, N°3,
103–118
[9] H. Kazutoshi, T. William and S. Atsushi. (2012). Investigation of
Flotation Parameters for Copper Recovery from Enargite and
Chalcopyrite Mixed Ore Materials Transactions, The Japan Institute of
Metals, Vol. 53, N°4, pp. 707 to 715
[10] A. Krstev, B. Krstev, Z. Zdravev, S. Ferat, J. Zivanovik and Z. Gocev.
(2013, June 12–16). The kinetic flotation modelling of chalcopyrite
from domestic ores using software tools, Proceedings of the XV Balkan
Mineral Processing Congress, Sozopol, Bulgaria.
[11] R. Z. Liu, W. Q. Qin, F. Jiao, X. J. Wang, P. Bin, Y. J. Yang and C. H.
Lai. (2016). Flotation separation of chalcopyrite from galena by
sodium humate and ammonium persulfate. Trans. Nonferrous Met.
Soc. China, Vol. 26, pp. 265–271.
[12] R. Natarajan and I. Nirdosh. (2006). A Comparative Study of Kinetics
of Flotation of a Copper-Nickel Ore by
N-Hydrocinnamoyl-N-Phenylhydroxylamine (HCNPHA) Vis-A-Vis
Potassium Amyl Xanthate (PAX), Proceedings of the International
Seminar on Mineral Processing Technology, Chennai, India. pp.
236–242
[13] M. Polat and S. Chander. (2000). First-order flotation kinetics models
and methods for estimation of the true distribution of flotation rate
constants. International Journal of Mineral Processing, Vol. 58, pp.
145–166
[14] W. Trahar, G. Senior and L. Shannon. (1994). Interactions between
sulphide minerals–the collectorless flotation of pyrite. International
Journal of Mineral Processing, Vol. 40, N°3–4, pp. 287–321
[15] M. Villena and G. Fernando. (2018). On Resource Depletion and
Productivity; The Case of the Chilean Copper Industry. Resource
Policy, Vol. 59, p. 553
[16] B. A. Wills. Mineral processing Technology. New York: Pergamon
Express, 1988.
[17] W. Xinrong, T. Changqing and Z. Yujun. (2019). IOP Conf. Series:
Earth and Environmental Science 237 032104.
[18] X. M. Yuan, B. J. Palsson and K. S. E. Forssberg. (1996). Statistical
interpretation of flotation kinetics for a complex sulphide ore. Minerals
Engineering, Vol. 9, N°4, pp. 429–442
[19] C. Zhang, N. Song, G. M. Zeng, M. Jiang, J. C. Zhang, X. J. Hu and J.
M. Zhen. (2014). Bioaccumulation of zinc, lead, copper, and cadmium
from contaminated sediments by native plant species and Acrida
cinerea in South China. Environ. Monit. Assess., Vol 186, pp.
1735–1745.
[20]
Meschack Muanda Mukunga: Graduate Engineer in
Department of chemical and metallurgical Engineering at University of
Lubumbashi since year 2016. Secondary school was done and completed in
Imara Institute in Lubumbashi/ DRCongo since 2009. Graduate has been
done at University of Lubumbashi in july 2016. Actually Master student
(student number 2060556) at in department of chemical and metallurgical
engineering, University of the Witwatersrand in Johannesburg/South Africa.
About research, “Optimization of current efficiency in electrowinning of
copper” has been done at MMG company (Kinsevere Mine) in year 2014.
Assistant teacher of Omalanga Pele Pascal Daniel who is teacher at
University of Lubumbashi since 2016