ArticlePDF Available

Beynen AC, 2019. Seaweed (gum) in petfood

Authors:

Abstract

Seaweed (gum) in petfood Seaweeds are macroalgae, plant-like organisms without specialized tissues. Production involves cultivated crops and some wild seaweed. Marine vegetables can be found in foods, treats and supplements for dogs and cats. They are declared on the label as seaweed, kelp or rockweed/Ascophyllum nodosum. Seaweed is lauded as micronutrient powerhouse, but this is subservient when used alongside or in complete petfood, which by definition meets the target-animals' nutrient needs. Some dental treats feature rockweed. As ingredient listed on petfood, the term seaweed is unspecific, while kelp refers to a mixture of brown algal species or actually denotes rockweed. The health claims made on seaweed in dog and cat foods are unsubstantiated. However, rockweed-enhanced treats may moderately slow the buildup of plaque and calculus, thus reducing the necessity for frequent brushing and/or elongating the interval between professional teeth cleanings. Quite some wet petfoods contain seaweed-derived gums that act as thickeners for optimum fluid stickiness and particle distribution. Those gums are carrageenan, agar and alginate, consisting of different, heterogeneous carbohydrate chains. Carrageenan is thought to cause bowel inflammation and cancer in dogs and cats (1-6). This has inspired some manufacturers to market petfoods with a "no carrageenan" claim (7, 8). In dry and wet petfood applications, that is at inclusion levels below 0.5%, dried seaweed (gum) has no known, negative effects on dogs and cats. Testing showed that dietary alginate is harmless in dogs. Agar and carrageenan most likely are safe petfood additives. Poligeenan, a research chemical in the form of degraded carrageenan, produces bowel inflammation and cancer, explaining the confusion and unnecessary concerns over whole carrageenan in petfood (9, 10). Legislation European legislation designates alginate, agar and carrageenan as technological additives in feedingstuffs, falling within the subclass of emulsifying and stabilizing agents, thickeners and gelling agents (11-13). Seaweed meal is listed in the catalogue of feed materials (14). Composition Both kelp and rockweed roughly contain 8% protein in the dry matter, 3% fat, 30% ash, and 60% carbohydrates. Up to half of the carbohydrates is alginate, while both fucoidan and laminaran account for one seventh (15-18). Noteworthily, kelp is high in iodine (0.14% in dry matter, 16) and rockweed in arachidonic acid (0.6%, 17). Within and between seaweed gums, structurally different polysaccharides are present (15). Alginates are extracted from brown seaweeds. They are made up of methylated and sulfated, D-and L-galactose units. Red seaweeds provide agars or carrageenans, which comprise either β-D
Creature Companion 2019; October: 44-45.
Anton C. Beynen
Seaweed (gum) in petfood
Seaweeds are macroalgae, plant-like organisms without specialized tissues. Production involves
cultivated crops and some wild seaweed. Marine vegetables can be found in foods, treats and
supplements for dogs and cats. They are declared on the label as seaweed, kelp or
rockweed/Ascophyllum nodosum. Seaweed is lauded as micronutrient powerhouse, but this is
subservient when used alongside or in complete petfood, which by definition meets the target-
animals’ nutrient needs. Some dental treats feature rockweed.
As ingredient listed on petfood, the term seaweed is unspecific, while kelp refers to a mixture of
brown algal species or actually denotes rockweed. The health claims made on seaweed in dog and
cat foods are unsubstantiated. However, rockweed-enhanced treats may moderately slow the
buildup of plaque and calculus, thus reducing the necessity for frequent brushing and/or
elongating the interval between professional teeth cleanings.
Quite some wet petfoods contain seaweed-derived gums that act as thickeners for optimum fluid
stickiness and particle distribution. Those gums are carrageenan, agar and alginate, consisting of
different, heterogeneous carbohydrate chains. Carrageenan is thought to cause bowel
inflammation and cancer in dogs and cats (1-6). This has inspired some manufacturers to market
petfoods with a “no carrageenan” claim (7, 8).
In dry and wet petfood applications, that is at inclusion levels below 0.5%, dried seaweed (gum)
has no known, negative effects on dogs and cats. Testing showed that dietary alginate is harmless
in dogs. Agar and carrageenan most likely are safe petfood additives. Poligeenan, a research
chemical in the form of degraded carrageenan, produces bowel inflammation and cancer,
explaining the confusion and unnecessary concerns over whole carrageenan in petfood (9, 10).
Legislation
European legislation designates alginate, agar and carrageenan as technological additives in
feedingstuffs, falling within the subclass of emulsifying and stabilizing agents, thickeners and gelling
agents (11-13). Seaweed meal is listed in the catalogue of feed materials (14).
Composition
Both kelp and rockweed roughly contain 8% protein in the dry matter, 3% fat, 30% ash, and 60%
carbohydrates. Up to half of the carbohydrates is alginate, while both fucoidan and laminaran
account for one seventh (15-18). Noteworthily, kelp is high in iodine (0.14% in dry matter, 16) and
rockweed in arachidonic acid (0.6%, 17).
Within and between seaweed gums, structurally different polysaccharides are present (15).
Alginates are extracted from brown seaweeds. They are made up of methylated and sulfated, D- and
L-galactose units. Red seaweeds provide agars or carrageenans, which comprise either β-D-
mannuronic and α-L–guluronic acids or sulfated D-galactose and (3,6)-anhydro-D-galactose units.
Fucoidan is a fucose-containing polysaccharide; laminaran is a branched beta-glucan.
Seaweed feeding
In two-bowl, preference tests, dogs received extruded, wheat-based foods without or with 0.3 or
1.0% powdered rockweed (19). The low dose did not affect food intake, but the high dose had a
pronounced, lowering effect. A supplier of rockweed recommends 0.25% as inclusion rate (20) and
maintains that there is no negative effect on palatability (21). The product would also support gut
health, immunity and de-stress in pets (21), but experimental designs and outcomes are undisclosed.
After 50 participants had given their dogs a macroalgae blend for 2-4 weeks, 15 out of the 17
respondents reported improved digestion, coat and skin for the recipients (22). In open,
uncontrolled trials, 60-days oral administration of a kelp mixture to dermatitic and osteoarthritic
dogs was associated with improvement (23). In the two before-and-after comparisons, the seaweed
doses were presumably equivalent to 1.5 and 0.6% in dry dog food.
Rockweed and teeth
Oral administration of Ascophyllum nodosum, versus no treatment or placebo, statistically
significantly reduced progression of dental plaque, calculus, gingivitis and halitosis in dogs (24-26),
but the effect sizes were relatively small. Outcomes in cats were similar (25). In a small-scale,
uncontrolled trial with dog patients given rockweed, regression of plaque and calculus was seen
(27).
The control and test dogs (n = 6-30/treatment) were either kennel- or privately-owned, subjected to
baseline dental cleansing or not, and fed the same diet or not, for 42-90 days (24-26). Rockweed, in
powdered or tablet form, was dosed at 33-50 mg/kg body weight per day. Fucoidan might be the
active principle as it inhibits dental-plaque bacteria in vitro (28). It may not survive high-temperature
processing (29, 30).
Gums and digestion
Data for dogs and cats are lacking, but seaweed-gum polysaccharides likely raise the viscosity of
intestinal contents and resist both digestive enzymes and bacterial breakdown (cf. 31-33). Ingested
carrageenan may appear in feces intact (33). The outcomes vary widely (34, 35, Note 1), but it may
be assumed that 0.5% carrageenan in wet food (2.5% in dietary dry matter) reduces apparent
protein digestibility in dogs and cats by no more than 3.5% units. Then, the additive would not
jeopardize the animals’ protein supply in practice (36). Alginate was found to increase protein
digestion in dogs (37, Note 1).
Seaweed(-gum) safety
Dried seaweed and seaweed-derived gums are included in (wet) petfood at levels up 0.5%. There is
no evidence for negative effects in dogs and cats. Dogs that ingested tableted rockweed, for 90 days
in an amount equivalent to 0.3% in dry food, gained body weight (26). Feeding dogs on dry food with
15% alginate for 1 year was without adverse effects (38, 39). Such a dog study with agar or
carrageenan appears unperformed.
High agar intakes did not induce negative, chronic effects in rats (40). Rats fed diets containing up to
15% carrageenan did not develop abnormalities, including colonic cancer (41, 42). Poligeenan, made
by harsh acid degradation of carrageenan, produced colonic cancer and ulceration (43-45).
Note 1
Effects of dietary carrageenan and alginate on apparent food digestion and fecal characteristics in
dogs and cats
Ref
D/C
D
n
C/A
C/A,
%
-
trol
Fecal digestibility,
% of intake
Fecal characteristics
OM
Prot
Fat
g/day
% DM
Score
34
D
n
r
3
-
0
1
91.0
89.3
88.8
,,
,,
,,
,,
C
5
,,
84.1
86.8
80.8
,,
,,
,,
,,
,,
10
,,
80.6
84.6
77.9
,,
,,
,,
,,
,,
20
,,
65.7
77.3
73.0
34
C
,,
3
-
0
,,
86.2
85.6
78.2
,,
,,
,,
,,
C
5
,,
77.2
82.3
68.2
,,
,,
,,
,,
,,
10
,,
70.6
75.0
60.3
,,
,,
,,
,,
,,
20
,,
57.0
77.2
54.5
35
D
12
12
C
1.6
2
88.1
79.3
28.9
3.2
,,
,,
,,
,,
,,
2.0
,,
84.5
72.1
27.7
3.2
37
D
11
5
-
0
3
95.7
90.6
96.6
57.3
26.2
3.2
,,
,,
,,
,,
A
3
,,
96.8
93.0
95.2
63.4
21.8
3.0
Ref = reference; D/C = dogs or cats; D = days, duration of feeding (nr = not reported); n = dogs/cats
per dietary treatment; C/A = carrageenan or alginate; C/A, % = % of diet (34) or of dietary dry
matter (35, 37); OM = organic matter; Prot = protein; Fecal characteristics: g/day as is; DM = dry
matter; Score = fecal score on a 1-5 scale, with 1 = hard, crumbly and 5 = diarrhea, liquid.
Control = control diet: 1, not reported; 2, wet diet containing 24.3% dry matter and 0.4%
carrageenan; the other diet contained 41.0% dry matter and 0.8% carrageenan and had almost the
same macronutrient composition of the dry matter, but it is not explicitly stated (35) that the dry
matter of the unsupplemented diets was identical; 3, enteral formula containing 23.8% dry matter
and 0.71% of 1:1 mixture of oat fiber and soy polysaccharide; to produce the test formula, the
mixture was replaced by alginate.
Reference 37 concerns dogs with an ileal cannula. Dietary alginate raised group-mean apparent ileal
digestibilities of organic matter and crude protein from 91.4 to 94.6 and from 80.5 to 90.2% of
intake.
Note 2. In a food preference study with dogs, the dry diets, which were based on either animal or
vegetable ingredients, contained 1.5% kelp (46), or rather Ascophyllum nodosum (20).
Note 3. Oral administration of fucoidan and fucoxanthin to aged dogs has been reported to improve
cardiac function (47).
Literature
1. Hofve J. Carrageenan: a controversial pet food additive. January 30, 2014.
https://littlebigcat.com/nutrition/carrageenan-a-common-pet-food-additive/
2. Carrageenan. How a “natural” food additive is making us sick. Cornucopia Institute, March 2013.
3. Decoding pet food. Adulteration, toxic ingredients, and the best choices for your companion
animals. Cornucopia Institute, November 2015.
4. Thixton S. Why carrageenan can be dangerous to your pet. May 6, 2015.
https://truthaboutpetfood.com/why-carrageenan-can-be-dangerous-to-your-pet/
5. Fox MW. Manufactured dog and cats foods: Is there poison in the can? August 8, 2015.
https://truthaboutpetfood.com/manufactured-dog-cat-foods-is-there-poison
6. Barrell A. Is carrageenan safe to eat? September 19, 2018.
https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/323117.php
7. Why carrageenan free? https://weruva.com/faq/why-carrageenan-free/
8. Best cat food without carrageenan. https://www.kittycatter.com/cat-food-without-carrageenan/
9. Cohen SM, Ito N. A critical review of the toxicological effects of carrageenan and processed
Eucheuma seaweed on the gastrointestinal tract. Crit Rev Toxicol 2002; 32: 413-444.
10. Weiner ML. Food additive carrageenan: Part II: A critical review of carrageenan in vivo safety
studies. Crit Rev Toxicol 2014; 44: 244-269.
11. Commission Regulation (EU) No 892/2010 of 8 October 2010 on the status of certain products
with regard to feed additives within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 of the European
Parliament and of the Council. OJEU L 226/6 (9.10.2010).
12. Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September
2003 on additives for use in animal nutrition. OJEU L 268/29 (18.10.2003).
13. Commission. List of the authorised additives in feedingstuffs (1) published in application of Article
9t (b) of Council Directive 70/524/EEC concerning additives in feedingstuffs (2004/C 50/01). OJEU
C50/1 (25.2.2004).
14. Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/1017 of 15 June 2017 amending Regulation (EU) No 68/2013
on the Catalogue of feed materials. OJEO L 159/48 (21.6.2017).
15. Rioux L-E, Turgeon SL. Seaweed carbohydrates. In: Seaweed sustainability. Food and Non-food
Applications (Tiwari B, Troy D, eds), Elsevier Inc, Amsterdam, 2015, pp 141-192.
16. Schiener P, Black KD, Stanley MS, Green DH. The seasonal variation in the chemical composition
of the kelp species Laminaria digitata, Laminaria hyperborea, Saccharina latissima and Alaria
esculenta. J Appl Phycol 2014. DOI 10.1007/s10811-014-0327-1
17. Lorenzo JM, Agregán R, Munekata PES, Franco D, Carballo J, Şahin S, Lacomba R, Barba FJ.
Proximate composition and nutritional value of three macroalgae: Ascophyllum nodosum, Fucus
vesiculosus and Bifurcaria bifurcata. Marine Drugs 2017, 15, 360. doi:10.3390/md15110360
18. Holdt SL, Kraan S. Bioactive compounds in seaweed: functional food applications and legislation.
J Appl Phycol 2011. DOI 10.1007/s10811-010-9632-5
19. Isidori M, Rueca F, Trabalza-Marinucci M. Palatability of extruded dog diets supplemented with
Ascophyllum nodosum L. (Fucaceae, Phaeophyceae). J Appl Phycol 2019.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-019-01799-5
20. Tasco product data sheet.
https://www.trouwnutritionusa.com/en/products/catalog/tasco/1563818
21. Tasco superfood of the sea. Trouw Pet Nutrition Outlook. Volume 1, 2016.
http://www.trouwpetnutritionoutlook.com/201601/Default/4/0#&pageSet=3
22. OceanFeedTM Pet. Ocean Harvest Technology, Binh Duong, Vietnam (Brochure).
23. Seaweed treatments shows health improvements. Vet Ireland J 2013; 574.
24. Wikner S, Bonello D, Miolo A. Effects of Ascophyllum nodosum on halitosis, plaque and gingivitis.
A controlled clinical trial in dogs. Proceedings of the 19th European Congress of Veterinary
Dentistry, Nice, 2010, pp 132-134.
25. Gawor J, Jodkowska K, Jank M. Effects of an Ascophyllum nodosum formulation on oral health
index in dogs and cats. Weterynaria w Praktyce 2013; 10: 74-79.
26. Gawor J, Jank M, Jodkowska K, Klim E, Svensonn UK. Effects of edible treats containing
Ascophyllum nodosum on the oral health of dogs: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled
single-center study. Frontiers Vet Sci 2018; 5: 168. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00168
27. Sörensson A. Varberg study - ProDen PlaqueOff® Animal. PlaqueOff Animal study, dogs and cats
2007-2008. SDC Swedencare AB, Kiruna, Sweden (Brochure)
28. Jun J-Y, Jung M-J, Jeong I-H, Yamazaki K, Kawai Y, Kim B-M. Antimicrobial and antibiofilm
activities of sulfated polysaccharides from marine algae against dental plaque bacteria. Marine
Drugs 2018; 16, 301. doi:10.3390/md16090301
29. Pure natural seaborn fucoidan. Kraeber & Co GmbH, Pharmazeutische Rohstoffe, 04/2012.
30. Sugiono, Widjanarko SB, Soehono LA. Extraction optimization by response surface methodology
and characterization of fucoidan from brown seaweed Sargassum polycystum. Int J ChemTech Res
2014; 6: 195-205.
31. Harmuth-Hoene A-E, Schwerdtfeger E. Effect of indigestible polysaccharides on protein
digestibility and nitrogen retention in growing rats. Nutr Metab 1979; 399-407.
32. Harmuth-Hoene A-E, Schelenz R. Effect of dietary fiber on mineral absorption in growing rats. J
Nutr 1980; 110: 1774-1784.
33. Arakawa S, Ito M, Tejima S. Promoter function of carrageenan on development of colonic tumors
induced by 1,2-dimethylhydrazine in rats. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol 1988; 34: 577-585.
34. Leibetseder J. Fibre in the dog’s diet. In: Nutrition and Behaviour in Dogs and Cats (Anderson RS,
ed), Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1982, pp 71-77.
35. Zentek J, Kaufmann D, Pietrzak T. Digestibility and effects on fecal quality of mixed diets with
various hydrocolloid and water contents in three breeds of dogs. J Nutr 2002; 132: 1679S-1681S.
36. Beynen AC. Seed gums in petfood. Creature Companion 2019; September: 40, 42.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335527236_Beynen_AC_2019_Seed_gums_in_petfood
37. Murray SM, Patil AR, Fahey Jr GC, Merchen NR, Wolf BW, Lai C-S, Garleb KA. Apparent
digestibility and glycaemic responses to an experimental induced viscosity dietary fibre incorporated
into an enteral formula fed to dogs cannulated in the ileum. Food Chem Toxicol 1999; 37: 47-56.
38. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP). Safety and
efficacy of sodium and potassium alginate for pets, other non-food producing animals and fish. EFSA
J 2017; 15: 4945. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4945
39. EFSA Panel on Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS). Re-evaluation of alginic acid
and its sodium, potassium, ammonium and calcium salts (E 400 –E 404) as food additives. EFSA J
2017; 15: 5049. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.5049
40. Melnick RL, Huff J, Haseman JK, Dieter MP, Grieshaber CK. Chronic effects of agar, guar gum,
gum arabic, locust-bean gum, or tara gum in F344 rats and B6C3F1 mice. Food Chem Toxicol 1983;
21: 305-311.
41. Nilson HW, Wagner JA. Feeding test with carrageenan. Food Res 1959; 24: 235-239.
42. Rustia M, Shubik P, Patil K. Lifespan carcinogenicity tests with native carrageenan in rats and
hamsters. Cancer Lett 1980; 11: 1-10.
43. Marcus R, Watt J. Colonic ulceration in young rats fed degraded carrageenan. Lancet 1971; 298:
765-766.
44. Wakabayashi K, Inagaki T, Fujimoto Y, Fukuda Y. Induction by degraded carrageenan of colorectal
tumors in rats. Cancer Lett 1978; 4: 171-176.
45. Oohashi Y, Ishioka T, Wakabayashi K, Kuwabara N. A study on carcinogenesis induced by
degraded carrageenan arising from squamous metaplasia of the rat colorectum. Cancer Lett 1981;
14: 267-272.
46. Callon MC, Cargo-Froom C, DeVries TJ, Shoveller AK. Canine food preference assessment of
animal and vegetable ingredient-based diets using single-pan tests and behavioral observation. Front
Vet Sci 2017; 4: Article 154. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2017.00154
47. Tsai C-H, Nam P, Lin Y-C. Fucoidan and fucoxanthin ameliorate cardiac function of aging canine.
Asian J Anim Vet Adv 2017; 12: 294-301.
... There are commercial dry and wet petfoods that contain seaweed (3). The inclusion levels, on a dry matter basis, are not higher than 0.5%. ...
Article
Full-text available
Promethium in petfood Promethium was the last of the 17 rare earth elements (Note 1) to be discovered. The milestone achievement was announced in 1947 (Note 2). All known isotopes of promethium are radioactive. Natural promethium is essentially absent in the food chain (Note 3), but promethium derived from fall out or nuclear discharge may be detectable in some foods. Promethium-145, the longest-lived radioisotope of the element, has a half-life of 17.7 years (Note 3). Unsurprisingly, promethium is not an essential nutrient for man and animals. Thus, its highest level in petfood and potential toxicity in dogs and cats are relevant. The greatest amount of promethium in petfood might be reached by the use of contaminated seaweed as an ingredient. In that case, the amount of radioactivity from promethium-147 could be as high as 0.275 becquerel per kg dietary dry matter of petfood, or per kg of the food's residue after removal of its moisture. Data on toxicity of oral promethium in dogs, cats and laboratory rodents were not found. Indirect and disputable deductions indicate that the estimated, highest amount of promethium in petfood is safe in the long term. That conclusion rests on two approaches. The non-toxic lung burden of promethium-147 in rats was estimated and converted into oral intake. The harmless dietary levels for curium-242 and americium-241 were used because the two closely resemble promethium-147. Promethium Promethium (Pm) is the only rare earth element (Note 1) that has no stable or long-lived isotopes (Note 3). In pure form, the REEs (Note 1) without particularizing are lustrous, silvery-white, soft metals. Promethium only forms the +3 oxidation state. The oxide (Pm2O3) may be produced by heating the oxalate, Pm2(C2O4)3. The chloride, PmCl3, has a lavender color. Most promethium is used in research, but it may be applied in atomic batteries also (1). Dietary promethium In four samples of seaweed (Fuous vesiculosis) collected in 1987 at the Sellafield shoreline of the Irish Sea, a mean amount of 11 becquerel (Bq) promethium-147 per kg of wet weight was measured (2). Sellafield is a large multifunction nuclear site on the coast of Cumbria, England. When assuming that the seaweed contained 20% dry matter, the amount of radioactivity was 55 Bq/kg dry matter. There are commercial dry and wet petfoods that contain seaweed (3). The inclusion levels, on a dry matter basis, are not higher than 0.5%. When the seaweed used as ingredient has 55 Bq 147 Pm/kg, food with an inclusion rate of 0.5% would contain 0.275 Bq/kg dietary dry matter (ddm). Metabolism Published data on metabolism of ingested or injected promethium in dogs and cats were not found. In dogs that were exposed to an aerosol containing 143 Pm2O3, radioactivity from promethium-143 was recovered in feces (Note 4). The quantity of fecal radioactivity on the first and second day post-inhalation was markedly higher than that on the third and fourth day. It can be deduced that dogs excrete absorbed, dietary promethium in feces.
... The analysed hafnium content in sodium alginate was 4.5 mg/kg dry matter (3). Wet petfoods may hold seaweed-derived gums, including alginate, that act as thickeners for optimum fluid stickiness and particle distribution (4). Flint clay, a kaolinitic mud stone (5), was reported to contain 15.4 mg Hf/kg (6). ...
Article
Full-text available
Hafnium in petfood The element hafnium was discovered 100 years ago (Note 1). As component of zirconium-containing minerals, rather than in elemental form, hafnium is present in the earth's crust, which implies its entrance of the food chain. There is no evidence that hafnium is an essential nutrient for man and animals (cf. Note 2). Thus, focus is on potential toxicity of dietary hafnium in dogs and cats (cf. Note 3). The maximum amount of hafnium in dog and cat food is set at 0.6 mg per kg dietary dry matter, or per kg of the food's residue after removal of its moisture. Intestinal absorption of hafnium from diets may be less than 0.5% of the intake. Thus, the gut contributes to prevent hafnium from accumulating in tissues after oral exposure. Absorbed hafnium is excreted in bile and urine. Via the small and large intestine, biliary hafnium reaches the feces. Dog and cat studies on the toxicity of oral hafnium could not be located. A 12-week feeding study in rats indicates that hafnium, in the form of hafnium chloride, is not likely to cause harm at levels below 60 mg/kg dietary dry matter. It is tentatively concluded that the estimated, maximum level of hafnium in petfood is safe. However, it should be stressed that long-term toxicity of hafnium in dogs and cats is unknown. Moreover, the chemical form of hafnium in petfood is unrevealed. Hafnium Hafnium (Hf) is a lustrous, silvery gray, tetravalent metal. It is generally produced as by-product of zirconium refinement (cf. Note 1). The end product is hafnium(IV) chloride, which can be converted to the metal by reduction with magnesium at about 1100 o C: HfCl4 + 2Mg-> Hf + 2MgCl2. Hafnium can be reconverted back into HfCl4 by passing chlorine gas and carbon tetrachloride vapor over it at about 600°C. Natural, radioactive hafnium may not exist, but 181 Hf can be formed by bombardment of stable hafnium with thermal neutrons. A paper (1) describes the synthesis of hafnium tetramandelate, Hf(C8H7O3)4 (see under Metabolism). It was implicitly suggested that the compound could be relevant to analytical chemistry. Dietary hafnium In 1976, Furr et al. (2) reported the results of hafnium analysis in wet, commercially available petfoods. Hafnium was analysed by non-destructive neutron activation. Twenty two wet dog foods were found to contain on average 0.15 mg total hafnium per kg dietary dry matter (mg Hf/kg ddm), with a range of not detectable (5 samples) to 0.4 mg (Note 4). For four wet cat foods, the reported amounts were not detectable, 0.2, 0.2 and 0.3 mg Hf/kg ddm. The analysed amounts in industrially-produced petfoods may be compared with the calculated amount in a simplified ingredient mixture. Poultry and wheat contain 0.08 and 0.07 mg Hf/kg dry matter (Note 5, 6). Thus, food composed of, on a dry-matter basis, 30% poultry, 50% wheat and 20% hafnium-free ingredients holds about 0.06 mg Hf/kg ddm. The maximum amount of hafnium may be arbitrarily set at 0.6 mg/kg ddm, or 10 times more than depicted by the abstract petfood formula.
Article
Full-text available
Although Ascophyllum nodosum, a brown seaweed (Phaeophyceae) of the family Fucaceae, is widely used in companion animal products, few studies have attempted to evaluate its influence on foodstuff palatability. This study investigated the effect of A. nodosum on extruded dog food palatability using the split-plate test. Eleven naїve dogs were used. Ascophyllum nodosum (AN) palatability was evaluated across separate tests for three pairwise comparisons between a control extruded food (CTR) and two experimental foods, obtained by adding A. nodosum at low (0.3%, AN-low) or high (1.0%, AN-high) concentrations to the CTR food. Food intake within the first 5 min and first choice eating behaviour was recorded. Differences in food consumption were only registered where the CTR and the AN-high foods were compared (21.11 vs. 7.62 g kg⁻¹ BW0.75; P < 0.001). The intake ratio, calculated as consumed food (A/A + B), confirmed this trend (0.75 vs. 0.28; P < 0.001). No differences were found in first choice behaviour in any palatability test. The results suggest that A. nodosum shows an inhibiting and dose-dependent effect on the dogs dry matter intake. Data obtained from the first choice behaviour evaluation also indicate that negative effects exerted by A. nodosum on palatability are primarily related to gustatory factors rather than to olfactory stimuli.
Article
Full-text available
Abstract Background and Objective: Aging process has been known to associated with cardiac abnormality. Fucoidan and fucoxanthin have been suggested as safe supplement. In this study, fucoidan in combination with fucoxanthin were used to enhance the impaired cardiac systolic and diastolic function in aging canine model. Materials and Methods: Aging canines were fed with fucoidan (125 mg kgG1) and fucoxanthin (125 mg kgG1) for 3 months. Echo cardiography was used to compute Tei index and related parameter such as E / E`, E` / A` and isovolumetric relaxation time (IVRT), isovolumetric contraction time (IVCT) was calculated using the Doppler model. T-Test was used to compare echo parameters. Data were displayed as Mean±SD. SPSS was used for statistical analysis. Results: IVRT and IVCT were shortened with 15.78±3.71 and 24.53±6.71%, respectively after fucoidan and fucoxanthin treatment, suggested that these two phytochemical compounds have cardioprotective effects in aging canine subjects with degenerative valve disease. Conclusion: After 3 consecutive months of Fucoidan and fucoxanthin usage, the cardiac function of aging canine was improved. Fucoidan and fucoxanthin may be considered as a potential treatment or supplement to aging canine subjects with abnormality in cardiac function.
Article
Full-text available
Fucoidanwere recovered from Sargassum polycystum by single-step extraction with ultrasonic wave pretreatment (amplitude 80%, 15 minute). Extraction wereoptimized using central composite design ofrespon surface method. Ultrasonic wave pretreatment conditions were 80%amplitude, for 15 minute. Alga solution in 0.03 MHCl ratio 1:20 (b/v) at70-90°C for 3-5 hour were evaluated duringthis process to establish a condition to maximize the extraction. The yield (%), total carbohydrate (mg/g), fucose (mg/g) and sulfate contents (mg/g) were also determined for eachexperimental condition. The result showed thatall extraction factors had significant effects (p<0.05) onfucoidan yield, fucose, total carbohydrate and sulfate contents. The optimum conditions were 81°C for 4.04 hours. The validated experimental crude fucoidanyield were7.15±5.58%, 131.15±1.92 mg/g fucose, 396.8±65.58 mg/gtotal carbohydrate and 94.67±1.37 mg/g sulfate contents. Characterization of crude fucoidan by FTIR and HPLC showed that crude fucoidan (Sargassum polycystum) is composed by fucose, xylose, galactose, rhamnose, glucose, mannose and sulfate.
Article
Full-text available
Abstract Carrageenan (CGN) is a seaweed-derived high molecular weight (Mw) hydrocolloid, primarily used as a stabilizer and thickener in food. The safety of CGN regarding its use in food is reviewed. Based on experimental studies in animals, ingested CGN is excreted quantitatively in the feces. Studies have shown that CGN is not significantly degraded by low gastric pH or microflora in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Due to its Mw, structure and its stability when bound to protein, CGN is not significantly absorbed or metabolized. CGN also does not significantly affect the absorption of nutrients. Subchronic and chronic feeding studies in rodents indicate that CGN at doses up to 5% in the diet does not induce any toxicological effects other than soft stools or diarrhea, which are a common effect for non-digestible high molecular weight compounds. Review of several studies from numerous species indicates that food grade CGN does not produce intestinal ulceration at doses up to 5% in the diet. Effects of CGN on the immune system following parenteral administration are well known, but not relevant to food additive uses. The majority of the studies evaluating the immunotoxicity potential were conducted with CGN administered in drinking water or by oral gavage where CGN exists in a random, open structured molecular conformation, particularly the lambda form; hence, it has more exposure to the intestinal mucosa than when bound to protein in food. Based on the many animal subchronic and chronic toxicity studies, CGN has not been found to affect the immune system, as judged by lack of effects on organ histopathology, clinical chemistry, hematology, normal health, and the lack of target organ toxicities. In these studies, animals consumed CGN at orders of magnitude above levels of CGN in the human diet: ≥1000 mg/kg/d in animals compared to 18-40 mg/kg/d estimated in the human diet. Dietary CGN has been shown to lack carcinogenic, tumor promoter, genotoxic, developmental, and reproductive effects in animal studies. CGN in infant formula has been shown to be safe in infant baboons and in an epidemiology study on human infants at current use levels.
Article
Full-text available
Seaweed is more than the wrap that keeps rice together in sushi. Seaweed biomass is already used for a wide range of other products in food, including stabilising agents. Biorefineries with seaweed as feedstock are attracting worldwide interest and include low-volume, high value-added products and vice versa. Scientific research on bioactive compounds in seaweed usually takes place on just a few species and compounds. This paper reviews worldwide research on bioactive compounds, mainly of nine genera or species of seaweed, which are also available in European temperate Atlantic waters, i.e. Laminaria sp., Fucus sp., Ascophyllum nodosum, Chondrus crispus, Porphyra sp., Ulva sp., Sargassum sp., Gracilaria sp. and Palmaria palmata. In addition, Undaria pinnatifida is included in this review as this is globally one of the most commonly produced, investigated and available species. Fewer examples of other species abundant worldwide have also been included. This review will supply fundamental information for biorefineries in Atlantic Europe using seaweed as feedstock. Preliminary selection of one or several candidate seaweed species will be possible based on the summary tables and previous research described in this review. This applies either to the choice of high value-added bioactive products to be exploited in an available species or to the choice of seaweed species when a bioactive compound is desired. Data are presented in tables with species, effect and test organism (if present) with examples of uses to enhance comparisons. In addition, scientific experiments performed on seaweed used as animal feed are presented, and EU, US and Japanese legislation on functional foods is reviewed. KeywordsHigh value-added products–Health promotion–Biorefinery–Nutraceutical–Pharmaceutical–Feed supplement
Chapter
Seaweeds contain many molecules of interest including polysaccharides (~50% of the algae) as alginate, agar, carrageenans, fucoidan and laminaran. Many of these polysaccharides are used in foods as thickener, gelling agent and emulsion stabilizer while others are mostly known for their biological activities. This chapter highlights the recent knowledge on food grade and none-food polysaccharides found in algae. Their common source, structure, extraction method and food utilization (or potential utilization) are presented. In future years, food enriched in seaweed extracts or containing purified algal polysaccharide may be used to increase the functionality of the food available on the market.
Article
The effect of five indigestible polysaccharides (IP) of different origin and chemical structure on N balance and dry matter digestibility was studied in growing rats. The diets contained 10% of gum guar (GG), carob bean gum (CBG), Na-alginate (Na-A), agar-agar (AA) or carrageenan (C), respectively. Dry matter digestibility and apparent protein digestibility were significantly decreased below control values by all 5 IP. N retention was significantly lower after ingestion of AA or C. In the rats receiving GG, CBG or Na-A urinary N excretion was reduced, thus compensating for increased fecal N losses by these animals. The different effects of the 5 substances on N balance are attributed to their partial breakdown through the action of intestinal microflora and/or their ability to partially inhibit the activity of proteolytic enzymes in the gastrointestinal tract. Trypsin inhibition in vitro was observed for C only. Suitability of the various IP as bulking agents in reducing diets is discussed.
Article
Degraded carrageenan derived from the red seaweed Eucheuma spinosum was given to Sprague-Dawley rats through the diet, in drinking water or by stomach tube for up to 24 months. Carrageenan-induced squamous cell carcinomas, adenocarcinomas and adenomas in the colorectum were observed. Some rats had metastases to the regional lymph nodes of squamous cell carcinomas. These results show that degraded carrageenan is carcinogenic to the colorectum of the rat.
Article
In order to understand the function of carrageenan, an indigestible polysaccharide, as a promoter of colonic tumors induced by 1,2-dimethylhydrazine (DMH), molecular weight distribution of fecal carrageenan and amounts of fecal bile acids in rats given carrageenan and DMH treatment were examined. Gel filtration pattern on Sephacryl S-300 of fecal carrageenan was very similar to that of feeding carrageenan, and carrageenan ingested was quantitatively excreted in feces. Hexafluoroisopropyl ester-trifluoroacetyl derivatives of fecal bile acids were analyzed by gas chromatography on QF-1. Although there was a decreased concentration of deoxycholic acid and total bile acids in carrageenan-fed rats compared to control rats, no difference in the daily output was found because carrageenan ingestion increases fecal output. Significant increased concentration and daily output of lithocholic acid, a tumor-promoter, by feeding carrageenan were found. Thus, it was suggested that the promoting effect of carrageenan on colon tumorigenesis by DMH may be mediated by increased excretion of lithocholic acid and may not participate in degradation of carrageenan ingested.