Conference PaperPDF Available

Designing for Multispecies Collaboration and Cohabitation

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Human-nature interaction, joining the agendas of sustainable interaction design and nonanthropocentric HCI, takes up the challenges presented by climate change and environmental crisis. My dissertation focuses on studying sustainable farming practices through posthuman concepts to experiment ways of supporting multispecies collaborative works. Specifically, my research aims to discover and develop alternative design paradigms and practices for sustaining both human-nature collaboration, cohabitation, and co-creation.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Designing for Multispecies
Collaboration and Cohabitation
Szu-Yu (Cyn) Liu
Indiana University
Bloomington, IN 47408 USA
cynliu@iu.edu
ABSTRACT
1
Human-nature interaction, joining the agendas of sustainable interaction design and
nonanthropocentric HCI, takes up the challenges presented by climate change and environmental
crisis. My dissertation focuses on studying sustainable farming practices through posthuman
concepts to experiment ways of supporting multispecies collaborative works. Specifically, my
research aims to discover and develop alternative design paradigms and practices for sustaining
both human-nature collaboration, cohabitation, and co-creation.
KEYWORDS
Human-nature interaction; posthuman; decentering humans; multispecies; sustainable HCI.
INTRODUCTION
My research focuses on human-nature interaction and sustainable agriculture to attend to
environmental challenges. Specifically, I engage in posthuman theories and investigate through on
the ground experimental farming, collaborative food making, decomposition in agriculture and
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee
provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and
the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses,
contact the Owner/Author(s).
CSCW’19 Companion, November 9-13, 2019, Austin, Texas, USA
© 2019 Copyright is held by the author/owner(s).
ACM ISBN 978-1-4503-6692-2/19/11.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3311957.3361861
Designing for Multispecies Collaboration and Cohabitation
CSCW ’19, November 9th-13th 2019, Austin, TX
Figure 1: Photos taken during my ethnographic
fieldwork in small-scale farms in Yilan, Taiwan
and Indiana, USA.
design to explore ways of working with nature, as opposed to controlling or working against it.
Building on my on-going ethnographic study on small-scale, sustainable farming practices in Taiwan
and Indiana (figure 1), my work proposes decentering the human in design to envision more
responsible ways of engaging in technological interventions. This line of research has led to a series of
publications in prestigious SIGCHI venues, including CHI2019 [14], TEI2019 [12], DIS2018 [11], and
LIMITS2018 [13]. In Summer, 2019, my three-month research internship program at Microsoft
Research focuses on creating and deploying environmental sensing technologies to support
environmental sustainability, public health, and social equity in urban spaces.
CONTEXT AND MOTIVATION
Prior to my doctoral studies, I was a product designer at an international personal computer design
firm. Having witnessed truck after truck of hardware and electronic waste being transported to
landfills every year, I am committed to forging together a stronger connection between design
practices and environmental sustainability. I build on the values and frameworks of sustainable HCI
but push for a broader definition of sustainability by bringing to the forefront the moments “when
species meet” [5]; I am interested in exploring the possibilities and challenges in decentering the
human in interaction design.
To do so, I turn to posthuman theories which consider humans, nonhumans, culture, and nature as
intricately entangled and thus challenges the taken-for-granted ontological boundaries [6,7]. My
research draws on anthropologist Anna Tsing’s work, especially her theoretical concept, “arts of
noticing,” to see “the divergent, layered, and conjoined projects that make up worlds” [20:22], to
cultivate the ability to acknowledge and simultaneously step in and out of familiar frames of
reference [9], and to imagine alternative futures by questions about “what is and what can be” [1].
RELATED WORKS AND MY RESEARCH OUTPUT
Two interaction design research communities emerged with the attempt to address challenges
associated with environmental crisis through design: sustainable interaction design and
nonanthropocentric HCI. In the former, studies show increasing interests moving from individual
persuasive technological design towards addressing the broader socioenvironmental challenges
[2,16]. More recently, scholars in nonanthropocentric HCI reflect on the limits of human-centric
design and argue the need to establish an alternative design agenda that encompasses a multispecies
worldview [3,19]; this body of research provides insight into nurturing interspecies collaboration [4],
cohabitation [18], and collaborative survival [8,10].
Posthuman concepts are particularly useful in resisting falling into habitual anthropocentric
perspectives by “considering the social as a tissue of associations between humans, nonhumans, and
objects working in the realisation of new relational formations.” [17:7]. However, the ability to move
from automatic perceptions toward seeing interspecies dependency is not easily cultivated; to Tsing,
to “notice differently” requires shifting attention between multiple threads of a relationship [20].
Designing for Multispecies Collaboration and Cohabitation
CSCW ’19, November 9th-13th 2019, Austin, TX
Figure 2: The process of decomposition and the
notion of natureculture co-creation is the guiding
principle for a series of ceramics experiments.
Figure 3: Tracking and gathering conditions of a
compost pile with Ode to Soil first prototype.
With the interest in increasing human-nature collaboration and cohabitation, I focus on translating
abstract posthuman concepts into more trackable interaction design interventions and actionable
design strategies. For example, in [12], my co-authors and I unpack through Haraway’s posthuman
theory natureculture the process of decomposition. Through a series of design curation, analysis, and
experiment, we propose the concept of “scaffolding” for those who are interested in natureculture co-
creation. In [13,14], we report our 2-year ethnography working alongside with small-scale farmers
and how we learn to see weeds and pests as companions. Through embodied understanding of the
earth, we reflect on ways of cultivating intimacy with the biosphere with and through technology.
In [11], my co-authors and I combine together visual thinking and critical reflection to “see” the
theoretical concept of natureculture by capturing through photographs different interfaces of
human-nature interaction. In [12], the posthuman concept natureculture is further consolidated
through a series of ceramics experiments (figure 2). Very recently, I experiment embodied knowledge
as yet another way of knowing [14]: in reflecting the symbiotic encounters, I work with eco-friendly
farmers, animals, plants, and soil, I look into nontraditional users (e.g., nonhumans) and emerging
forms of uses (e.g., interactions between human and other species) to help open a design space for
technological interventions. In DIS2019, I am co-organizing a workshop to explore and develop
methodological approaches for HCI researchers and practitioners to “notice differently” and envision
ways of engaging in nontraditional and marginal users through technological interventions [15].
RESEARCH GOALS, QUESTIONS, AND METHODS
When human activities render resource exhaustion, species extinction, and other forms of conflicts
between humans and the environment, new ways of noticing, responding, and imagining are needed
to move toward to preferable futures. Specifically, my research questions include: (1) How may
interaction designers incorporate natural phenomenon and nonhuman actors into their creative
processes? (2) What can design practitioners learn from the interaction between humans and
nonhumans to inform design practices? (3) How may technological interventions support more
sustainable, ethical, aesthetic, and intimate forms of human-nature interaction? The methods involve
in my dissertation research are multi-fold, including qualitative social science methods (e.g.,
ethnography, interviewing, and observation), art-based inquiry methodologies (e.g., research through
design), and approaches originated from the humanities (e.g., interaction criticism and close reading).
My on-going ethnography focuses on sustainable farming experiments, including eco-friendly
farming, small-scale farming, organic farming, and AgTech. Common across these practices is the
farmers’ commitment in exploring the alternatives to industrial agriculture, with a particular focus on
reducing the use of pesticides to integrate more harmonious between land, people, environment, and
resources. In these alternative farming practices, the farm is not so much a controlled system, but an
assemblage characterized by multiple systems or rationalities always evolving and changing. By
working alongside with the farmers, I reflect on posthumanist values and learn to “notice differently.”
Designing for Multispecies Collaboration and Cohabitation
CSCW ’19, November 9th-13th 2019, Austin, TX
CONTRIBUTIONS AND GOALS FOR CSCW DC
My goal for the CSCW DC is to receive feedback
on reworking existing HCI research methods for
multispecies collaboration as well as leveraging
other disciplinary input (anthropology, STS,
environmental science) for biodiversity research
in HCI/CSCW. I hope to contribute to the CSCW
DC by sharing my experience in designing and
theorizing multispecies collaboration.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I thank my PhD advisors, Jeffrey Bardzell and
Shaowen Bardzell, for their all-time tremendous
mentorship and unconditional supports. I’m
thankful for my committee members, Eli Blevis
and Barbara Dennis for their insightful feedback.
I’m grateful for the inspirational conversations I
have with Justin Cranshaw and Asta Roseway at
Microsoft Research in supporting my dissertation
work. This research is supported in part by
Taiwan’s Ministry of Education and the NSF
under award #1513604.
Building on my previous ethnographic and design works, I am currently designing an acoustic probe,
“Ode to Soil”, that tracks different attributes of compost piles (e.g., temperature, humidity, biometric
movement) and translates the digital reads into musical notes (figure 3). The design explores a more
embodied and aesthetic form of human-nature interaction and collaboration that attunes human
senses to the rhythms of the natural environment. The next stage of my dissertation research
involves deploying this acoustic probe to examine how human-nature engagement might unfold to
cultivate biodiversity and sustainability.
REFERENCES
[1] Eli Blevis. 2018. Seeing What Is and What Can Be: On Sustainability, Respect for Work, and Design for Respect. In
CHI ’18, Paper No. 370.
[2] Jaz Hee-jeong Choi and Eli Blevis. 2010. HCI & sustainable food culture: A design framework for engagement. In
NordiCHI ’10, 112117.
[3] Rachel Clarke, Sara Heitlinger, Ann Light, Laura Forlano, Marcus Foth, and Carl Disalvo. 2019. More-Than-Human
Participation: Design for Sustainable Smart City Futures. Interactions, 6063.
[4] Laura Forlano. 2016. Decentering the Human in the Design of Collaborative Cities. Design Issues 32, 3: 4254.
[5] Donna J. Haraway. 2008. When Species Meet. University of Minnesota Press, London.
[6] Donna J Haraway. 2016. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press.
[7] Joanna Latimer and Mara Miele. 2013. Naturecultures? Science, Affect and the Non-human. Theory, Culture & Society
30, 78: 531.
[8] Ann Light, Alison Powell, and Irina Shklovski. 2017. Design for Existential Crisis in the Anthropocene Age. In C&T ’17.
[9] Silvia Lindtner, Shaowen Bardzell, and Jeffrey Bardzell. 2018. Design and Intervention in the Age of “No Alternative.”
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW: Article 109.
[10] Jen Liu, Daragh Byrne, and Laura Devendorf. 2018. Design for Collaborative Survival: An Inquiry into Human-Fungi
Relationships. In CHI’18, 113.
[11] Szu-Yu (Cyn) Liu, Jeffrey Bardzell, and Shaowen Bardzell. 2018. Photography as A Design Research Tool into
Natureculture. In DIS ’18, 777789.
[12] Szu-Yu (Cyn) Liu, Jeffrey Bardzell, and Shaowen Bardzell. 2019. Decomposition as Design: Co-Creating (with)
Natureculture. In TEI ’19.
[13] Szu-Yu (Cyn) Liu, Shaowen Bardzell, and Jeffrey Bardzell. 2018. Out of Control: Reframing Sustainable HCI Using
Permaculture. In LIMITS ’18, Article No. 2.
[14] Szu-Yu (Cyn) Liu, Shaowen Bardzell, and Jeffrey Bardzell. 2019. Symbiotic Encounters: HCI and Sustainable
Agriculture. In CHI ’19.
[15] Szu-Yu (Cyn) Liu, Jen Liu, Kristin Dew, Patrycja Zdziarska, Maya Livio, and Shaowen Bardzell. 2018. Exploring
Noticing as Method in Design Research. In DIS ’18.
[16] Juliet Norton, Nico Herbig, Lynn Dombrowski, Ankita Raturi, Bonnie Nardi, Sebastian Prost, Samantha McDonald,
Daniel Pargman, Oliver Bates, Maria Normark, and Bill Tomlinson. 2017. A grand challenge for HCI: food +
sustainability. Interactions 24, 5055.
[17] María Puig de la Bellacasa. 2010. Ethical doings in naturecultures. Ethics, Place and Environment 13, 2: 151169.
[18] Nancy Smith, Shaowen Bardzell, and Jeffrey Bardzell. 2017. Designing for Cohabitation: Naturecultures, Hybrids, and
Decentering the Human in Design. In CHI’17, 17141725.
[19] Vanessa Thomas;, Christian Remy, and Oliver Bates. 2017. The Limits of HCD: Reimagining the Anthropocentricity of
ISO 9241-210. In LIMITS ’17.
[20] Anna Lowenhaupt Tsing. 2015. The Mushroom at the End of the World. Princeton University Press.
... In this narrative, white ibises are considered "refugees from drought" (Allatson and Connor 2020, 372), "cult-hero[es]," or "Aussie battler[s]" (Stevens 2018). Following the two dominant narratives, in urban management plans, white ibises appear mainly as a target of intervention and never as fellow urban residents and coinhabitants (Foth 2017;Smith, Bardzell, and Bardzell 2017;Liu 2019). ...
... To surpass this limitation, biodiversity databases need to engage with a more-than-human design approach to collecting and (Re)Imagining the Ibis representing data on depicted and governed species. Such an approach translates environmental humanities' scholarship into design research through more-than-human thinking (Foth 2017;Smith, Bardzell, and Bardzell 2017;Clarke et al. 2019;Liu 2019). Our chapter suggests the need for a two-way dialogue between design and DEH. ...
Chapter
Over the past decade, environmental science and governance have undergone a ‘big data’ and ‘smart technology’ turn. Environmental sensing and monitoring technologies now gather an unprecedented amount of data about the Earth, including its biodiverse species. While these technologies are deployed for the purpose of preservation and conservation, they have been criticised for their tendency to reduce more-than-human life to data and to exert forms of algorithmic control over that data in a way that diminishes multispecies justice. In this paper, we argue for the importance of bringing digital environmental humanities (DEH) perspectives to bear on environmental governance—particularly in thinking through and planning for multispecies future(s) in an increasingly urbanised world. We focus on smart urban governance models and explore the role of biodiversity databases in environmental governance. Taking the Australian White Ibis as the protagonist of this chapter, we reveal how representation of the White Ibis in two biodiversity databases—namely the Atlas of Living Australia and Big City Birds—reinforces human-centred environmental governance. By engaging with the data-driven portrayal of ibises, the paper mobilises the more-than-human turn to propose a future direction for biodiversity databases that acknowledges nonhuman agency.
... These agents form novel societies that include humans, non-human biological beings, and artificial systems as envisaged in notions such as smart cities, smart villages, smart landscapes, or even Digital or Smart Earth. Our work seeks to extend emerging research on these topics including discussions of urban paradigms that support survival and wellbeing of non-human living beings (Forlano 2016;Foth 2017;Smith et al. 2017), considerations of circular-economy villages (Liaros 2021), and multispecies cohabitation in the context of farming (Liu 2019). ...
Chapter
Full-text available
Climate change, rapid urbanisation, pandemics, as well as innovations in technologies such as blockchain, artificial intelligence (AI), and the Internet of Things (IoT) are all impacting urban space. One response to such changes has been to make cities ecologically sustainable and ‘smart’. From real-time bus information, autonomous electric vehicles, smart parking, and smart street lighting, such initiatives are often presented as a social and environmental good. Critics, however, increasingly argue that technologically driven, and efficiency-led approaches to sustainability in the smart city are too simplistic and leave little room for participation and citizen agency despite government efforts to integrate innovative technologies in more equitable ways. This has prompted a growing awareness that a human-centred notion of cities, in which urban space is designed for, and inhabited by, humans only, is no longer tenable. Within the age of the Anthropocene, increasing numbers of scholars and practitioners are acknowledging the entanglements between human and non-human others (including plants, animals, insects, as well as soil, water, and sensors and their data) in urban life. In Designing More-than-Human Smart Cities, renowned researchers and practitioners from urban planning, architecture, environmental humanities, geography, design, arts, and computing critically explore smart cities beyond a human-centred approach. They respond to the complex interrelations between human and non-human others in urban space. Through theory, policy, and practice (past and present), as well as thinking speculatively about how smart cities may evolve in the future, the book makes a timely contribution to lively, contemporary scientific and political debates on what it means to design genuinely sustainable smart cities.
... Through making invisible visible, computing tools can help makers empathize the importance of non-human beings and foster a reflexive, speculative conversation with them. Design works such as Ode to Soil [45] and Collaborative Survival [44] provide starting points for explorations. ...
Chapter
Full-text available
Eco-home makers are permaculturists, artists and environmentalists who actively engage with the environment and nature in order to build self-made, sustainable homes. Through the conceptual lens of “placemaking”, we draw on an ethnographic study of eco-home makers and focus on unpacking important lessons for sustainable HCI research. Engaging with 15 eco-home makers in rural Australia and China, we aim to develop an in-depth understanding of how and why they design, build and retrofit their eco-homes. Our findings show that eco-home makers apply a material-first approach, align their designs with nature and are influenced by sociality and everydayness of making. We conclude by discussing how such insights can deepen our understanding of placemaking and DIY in HCI, and open up new avenues for future design and research of computing tools to empower residents as place-makers, enabling them to make their own living environments sustainable.
... Through making invisible visible, computing tools can help makers empathize the importance of nonhuman beings and foster a reflexive, speculative conversation with them. Design works such as Ode to Soil [75] and Collaborative Survival [50] provide starting points for explorations. ...
Preprint
Full-text available
Eco-home makers are permaculturists, artists and environmentalists who actively engage with the environment and nature in order to build self-made, sustainable homes. Through the conceptual lens of "placemaking", we draw on an ethnographic study of eco-home makers and focus on unpacking important lessons for sustainable HCI research. Engaging with 15 eco-home makers in rural Australia and China, we aim to develop an in-depth understanding of how and why they design, build and retrofit their eco-homes. Our findings show that eco-home makers apply a material-first approach, align their designs with nature and are influenced by sociality and everydayness of making. We conclude by discussing how such insights can deepen our understanding of placemaking and DIY in HCI, and open up new avenues for future design and research of computing tools to empower residents as place-makers, enabling them to make their own living environments sustainable.
... Nature conservation and urban greening projects in cities, as recent studies argue, often tend to borne disproportionate benefits, grossly disregarding environmental justice issues (Wolch, Byrne, & Newell, 2014). Urban sustainability studies, which largely speaks about integral needs to reconceptualize urban infrastructure and urban ecological management, prompt towards a needed turn towards equitybased approaches, fitting post-anthropocentric cities (Liu, 2019;Yigitcanlar et al., 2019aYigitcanlar et al., , 2019b. We argue that environmental placemaking has significant potential in recreating nature conservation methods and enhancing inclusiveness within the practices, through networked multi-actor and interactive approaches, engaging 'a broad range of citizens and hyper-local actions' (Houghton, 2015: 6). ...
Article
The aim of this paper is to understand dynamic processes of environmental stewardship in global urban cities, using an analytical lens of environmental placemaking. We demonstrate the importance of using the conceptual framework of environmental placemaking to understand newer forms of environmental consciousness, through a case study of the Indian megacity of Bengaluru – a heterogenous, multicultural urban landscape. Drawing on in- depth conversations with lake visitors and lake workers around three recently restored lakes in south-eastern Bengaluru – Kaikondrahalli, Kasavanahalli and Sowle Kere – we explore how these lakes are harnessed as ‘places’ by migrants to the city. Through representations of lakes as coupled ‘social’ and ‘environmental’ places, we explore the role of placemaking in shaping contemporary environmentalism and an interest in stewardship action for lake conservation. We argue that environmental placemaking leads to a fundamental transformation in human-nature conservation relationships in modern cities. We demonstrate how experiences of environmental placemaking are constituted by migrants into cities and are fundamental in making the city and local ecosystem a place of cohabitation, fostered by growing emotional attachment which stimulates a desire for environmental action.
Article
Full-text available
This paper presents a systemic literature review of Sustainable Interaction Design. We use the PRISMA model to guide the review. In the analysis of the identified papers, we identify an emergent and significant shift in the discourse on Sustainable Interaction Design from its original introduction in 2007. The shift in discourse concerns extensions both in the methodology as well as the impact, which is oddly underexplored. Regarding the methodology, we found that the objectives of sustainability are pursued by the concrete features of designed artifacts or through the use impact of design and that the design contains a process of learning for all participating parties, captured in the notion of sustainability in designing. By complementing this with the pursued impact of social, environmental, and economic sustainability, we point to where the current research tends to cluster, which areas are underexplored, and, thus, where new research agendas are needed. Here, the limited interest in studying how Interaction Design fosters sustainability while including an economic perspective stands out. In the concluding parts of this paper, we propose future research trajectories of SID and speculate and discuss opportunities and challenges for future research.
Chapter
Climate change, rapid urbanisation, pandemics, as well as innovations in technologies such as blockchain, artificial intelligence (AI), and the Internet of Things (IoT) are all impacting urban space. One response to such changes has been to make cities ecologically sustainable and ‘smart’. From real-time bus information, autonomous electric vehicles, smart parking, and smart street lighting, such initiatives are often presented as a social and environmental good. Critics, however, increasingly argue that technologically driven, and efficiency-led approaches to sustainability in the smart city are too simplistic and leave little room for participation and citizen agency despite government efforts to integrate innovative technologies in more equitable ways. This has prompted a growing awareness that a human-centred notion of cities, in which urban space is designed for, and inhabited by, humans only, is no longer tenable. Within the age of the Anthropocene, increasing numbers of scholars and practitioners are acknowledging the entanglements between human and non-human others (including plants, animals, insects, as well as soil, water, and sensors and their data) in urban life. In Designing More-than-Human Smart Cities, renowned researchers and practitioners from urban planning, architecture, environmental humanities, geography, design, arts, and computing critically explore smart cities beyond a human-centred approach. They respond to the complex interrelations between human and non-human others in urban space. Through theory, policy, and practice (past and present), as well as thinking speculatively about how smart cities may evolve in the future, the book makes a timely contribution to lively, contemporary scientific and political debates on what it means to design genuinely sustainable smart cities.
Article
Tracing the story of beaver restoration across California, this paper investigates the emerging discourse of ‘working with nature’ through the lens of animal work and labour, exploring possibilities for, and conceptualising, multispecies collaboration. At the intersection of animal geographies, environmental anthropology, and geographies of conservation, this paper finds three concurrent modes of working with beaver: beaver as labourer, beaver as coworker, and beaver as community. Beaver as labourer emerges as a mode where beavers go from material resource to low‐wage labourer, their liveliness predicated on their ability to be working for humans. Beaver as coworker transitions beavers from labourers to workers, respected for their skills as ecosystem engineers to be working with. Beaver as community emerged as a mode in which beavers and humans live with each other as kin, amidst wider multispecies assemblages. This mode sets the foundation to theorise the concept of multispecies collaboration, a term often used in the literature, but never defined. This paper explores the concept through theories of animal work and labour, challenging the premise of work altogether, while situating multispecies collaboration as an in‐between, a both/and space of working and living with ‘nature.’ This paper serves as an important reflection on the ways in which humans ‘work with nature,’ in a time where various nonhumans are being made to be ‘workers.’ It presents and analyses these relations, ruminates on implications for governance of these multispecies spaces, and develops the concept of multispecies collaboration as a critical consideration for Nature‐based Solutions.
Article
Full-text available
The term ‘sustainability’ has become an overused umbrella term that encompasses a range of climate actions and environmental infrastructure investments; however, there is still an urgent need for transformative reform work. Scholars of urban studies have made compelling cases for a more-than-human conceptualisation of urban and environmental planning and also share a common interest in translating theory into practical approaches and implications that recognise (i) our ecological entanglements with planetary systems and (ii) the urgent need for multispecies justice in the reconceptualisation of genuinely sustainable cities. More-than-human sensibility draws on a range of disciplines and encompasses conventional and non-conventional research methods and design approaches. In this article, we offer a horizon scan type of review of key posthuman and more-than-human literature sources at the intersection of urban studies and environmental humanities. The aim of this review is to (i) contribute to the emerging discourse that is starting to operationalise a more-than-human approach to smart and sustainable urban development, and; (ii) to articulate a nascent framework for more-than-human spatial planning policy and practice.
Conference Paper
Full-text available
Recent sustainable HCI research has advocated "working with nature" as a potentially efficacious alternative to human efforts to control it: yet it is less clear how to do so. We contribute to the theoretical aspect of this research by presenting an ethnographic study on alternative farming practices, in which the farm is not so much a system but an assemblage characterized by multiple systems or rationalities always evolving and changing. In them, relationships among species alternate between mutually beneficial in one moment (or season), and harmful in the next. If HCI is to participate in and to support working with nature, we believe that it will have to situate itself within such assemblages and temporalities. In this work, we look into nontraditional users (e.g., nonhumans) and emerging forms of uses (e.g., interactions between human and other species) to help open a design space for technological interventions. We offer three ethnographic accounts in which farmers-and ourselves as researchers-learn to notice, respond, and engage in symbiotic encounters with companion species and the living soil itself.
Article
Full-text available
In this forum we highlight innovative thought, design, and research in the area of interaction design and sustainability, illustrating the diversity of approaches across HCI communities. --- Roy Bendor, Editor
Conference Paper
Full-text available
HCI in recent years has shown an increasing interest in decentering humans in design. This decentering is a response to concerns about environmental sustainability, technology obsolescence, and consumerism. Scholars have introduced theoretical notions such as natureculture from feminist technoscience. Yet how such theories translate into material design practices remains an open question. This research seeks to broaden the repertoire of nonanthropocentric design practices in HCI. Specifically, it draws on the natural processes of decomposition as a creative approach to develop and test design tactics. To do so, we curate and critique hundreds of examples of decomposition in architecture, design, textile, crafting, and food making. We observe that decomposition often depends on what we call a "scaffold," and we further propose four variants of it as design tactics: fragmenting, aging, liberating, and tracing. We then tested the tactics over a period of four months in a ceramics studio using diverse materials, with a mixture of successes and failures. We conclude by reflecting on how the design tactics might be deployed in nonanthropocentric HCI/design.
Conference Paper
Full-text available
In response to recent calls for HCI to address ongoing environmental crises and existential threats, this paper introduces the concept of collaborative survival and examines how it shapes the design of interactive artifacts. Collaborative survival describes how our (human) ability to persist as a species is deeply entangled with and dependent upon the health of a multitude of other species. We explore collaborative survival within the context of designing tools for mushroom foraging and reflect on how interactive products can open new pathways for noticing and joining-with these entanglements towards preferable futures. In addition to highlighting three tactics-engagement, attunement and expansion-that can guide designs towards multispecies flourishing, our prototypes illustrate the potential for wearable technology to extend the body into the environment.
Article
This paper explores the relationship between design and intervention, and how scholars of computing and design might strengthen their repertoire of intervention amidst a pervasive sense of there being "no alternative" to structures of inequality and capitalist expansion. Drawing from the authors' long-term ethnographic research on maker, entrepreneurship, and innovation cultures as well as their engagements with professional communities of computing and design, this paper introduces and theorizes modes of intervention that do not fit familiar images of political action such as the countercultural hero or localized resistance. The paper contributes by expanding the analytical repertoire of an interventionist-oriented social computing scholarship. Specifically, it offers three inter-related analytical sensibilities from feminist and critical race studies-"noticing differently," "walking alongside" and "parasitic resistance"- to support political and activist approaches in CSCW and related fields
Conference Paper
Sustainable HCI research is often framed in terms of correction and control, such as designing persuasive technology to encourage individual behavior change or to optimize energy consumption. But as others have argued, correction and control-based approaches detach sustainable HCI from the sociotechnical realm, e.g., by oversimplifying the complexities of the social world and how they participate in unsustainable practices. Many agree that the sustainable HCI community needs to move beyond persuasion and behavior change-but how? In this paper, we introduce an alternative to the control paradigm. We turn to the philosophy of permaculture, which emphasizes working with nature rather than against it, as the control model does. Specifically, we present our fieldwork in contemporary agriculture in Taiwan, which experiments with permaculture-based approaches to agriculture, blending ancient traditions of farming with cutting edge technologies and philosophies. This work demonstrates how permaculture philosophy's alternative to the control model creates potential openings and new framings for sustainable HCI.
Conference Paper
We use photography as a research method to cultivate a designerly sensibility of the theoretical concept natureculture, a provocation to transgress the dichotomy of nature and culture. We investigate the visual language of natureculture through an iterative practice of creating, editing, organizing, and reflecting on images. Specifically, we explore natureculture as spatiotemporal movements, sediment-like layers, heterogeneous gatherings, formal homonyms, emotional experiences, and aestheticized expressions of style. Each of these has a materioformal concreteness and symbolic density that supports design ideation on topics such as environmental sustainability, agroecological systems, human-animal cohabitation, urban informatics, and more.