Content uploaded by Yasar Avsar
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Yasar Avsar on Oct 28, 2019
Content may be subject to copyright.
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Electrocoagulation process for the treatment of metal-plating
wastewater: Kinetic modeling and energy consumption
Fatih Ilhan (✉), Kubra Ulucan-Altuntas, Yasar Avsar, Ugur Kurt, Arslan Saral
Environmental Engineering Department, Yildiz Technical University, Esenler/Istanbul 34220, Turkey
1 Introduction
Ensuring the treatability of wastewaters formed by rapidly
increasing industrialization carries vital significance from
an environmental point of view. Among industries, metal-
plating industrial wastewaters in particular need to be
treated because of their highly toxic nature. Metal-plating
industrial wastewater and sludge are toxic for all living
creatures, because they contain cyanide and are acidic in
character, as well as containing a wide variety of heavy
metal types. Heavy metals can cause serious illnesses or
even death as a result of their bioaccumulation in the vital
organs of living bodies through the food chain (Choi and
Meier, 2001; Hashim and Chu, 2004; Martins et al., 2004;
Lee et al., 2016).
This branch of industry, which aims to prepare the metal
for use by processing its external surface, uses a wide
variety of processes. These processes are generally one of
✉Corresponding author
E-mail: filhan@yildiz.edu.tr
Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 2019, 13(5): 73
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-019-1152-1
HIGHLIGHTS
•The wastewater from industrial area was treated
by EC via Fe and Al electrodes.
•Cu, Ni, Cr and Zn were highly removed at the
first minutes, simultaneously.
•Pseudo-2nd-order was found to be more suitable
for kinetics.
•Adsorption capacities based on kinetic modeling
were observed as Cr>Cu>Ni>Zn.
•The chemical cost in the case of pH adjustment
after EC was less as 3.83 $/m
3
.
ARTICLE INFO
Article history:
Received 15 April 2019
Revised 25 July 2019
Accepted 2 August 2019
Available online 20 September 2019
Keywords:
Electrochemical treatment
Heavy metals
Kinetic modeling
Pseudo first order kinetic
Pseudo second order kinetic
GRAPHIC ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT
It is known that wastewater produced by the metal-plating industry contains several heavy metals,
which are acidic in nature and therefore toxic for the environment and for living creatures. In particular,
heavy metals enter the food chain and accumulate in vital organs and cause serious illness. The
precipitation of these metals is mostly achieved by pH adjustment, but as an alternative to this method,
the electrocoagulation process has investigated in this study using iron and aluminum electrodes. The
effects of the pH adjustment on removal before and after the electrocoagulation process were
investigated, and cost analyses were also compared. It was observed that a high proportion of removal
was obtained during the first minutes of the electrocoagulation process; thus, the current density did
not have a great effect. In addition, the pH adjustment after the electrocoagulation process using iron
electrodes, which are 10%more effective than aluminum electrodes, was found to be much more
efficient than before the electrocoagulation process. In the process where kinetic modeling was
applied, it was observed that the heavy metal removal mechanism was not solely due to the collapse of
heavy metals at high pH values, and with this modeling, it was seen that this mechanism involved
adsorption by iron and aluminum hydroxides formed during the electrocoagulation process. When
comparing the ability of heavy metals to be adsorbed, the sequence was observed to be
Cr>Cu>Ni>Zn, respectively.
© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019
three main groups: cleaning, painting and coating. Organic
solvents, organic or inorganic acids, bases and metal salts
such as nickel and chromium are used in a plating bath to
coat the metal in these industries. Metal-coating industries
constitute an important source of pollution discharged into
the environment due to the use of toxic chemical materials
(Choi et al., 2000). The removal of heavy metals is mainly
achieved chemically. The most common method is to
enable removal at high pH values (Huang et al., 2011; Lee
et al., 2017). However, high costs are encountered due to
the buffering capacity of the metal-coating wastewaters.
Since different pHs are required for each type of metal, the
use of this process on its own has significant disadvan-
tages. Consequently, it is thought that this necessary
process can be achieved through electrocoagulation, which
is a more highly developed model for chemical precipita-
tion.
The basic principle of electrocoagulation is to produce
coagulants by means of an electric current using iron
electrodes instead of iron salts and using aluminum
electrodes instead of aluminum salts (Ilhan et al., 2008;
Coskun et al., 2012; Qi et al., 2018). The metals dissolved
by the anodic reactions caused by the electric current can
function as coagulants. One of the most important
advantages of the electrocoagulation process is that, in
addition to the chemical coagulation as a result of the
electrolytic reactions during the process, the partial
adsorption, electro-oxidation and electro-flotation pro-
cesses are carried out simultaneously by the same
mechanism (Avsar et al., 2007). Because of all these
advantages, electrocoagulation is used in a wide range of
areas (in domestic and industrial wastewater treatment)
(Vasudevan et al., 2008; Vasudevan et al., 2009; Kobya et
al., 2014; Ulucan and Kurt, 2015; Can et al., 2016; Deghles
and Kurt, 2016; Song et al., 2016; Hashim et al., 2018; Xu
et al., 2018; Maher et al., 2019). The pH is one of the most
important operating conditions in the electrocoagulation
process. Adjustment of pH before or after the treatment
should be investigated according to wastewater and the
optimum pH should be determined (Naje et al., 2017;
Ahangarnokolaei et al., 2018). For all these reasons, it can
be seen that the electrocoagulation process can be a very
efficient method to treat metal-plating industrial waste-
waters. Moreover, it is of great importance that not only the
basic cost but also the possible costs of chemicals are
minimized. When iron or aluminum electrodes are used in
the electrocoagulation process, electrolytic dissociation
formed as a result of the electrical voltage results in the
formation of metal hydroxides such as Fe(OH)
3
with the
dissolved iron electrode, and Al(OH)
3
with the aluminum
electrode. The main removal mechanism of pollutants from
the electrocoagulation is by adsorption via the metal
hydroxides produced, which have a very high adsorption
capacity. For this reason, electrocoagulation is currently
used in many places today. During this process, the
electrolytic reactions formed on the electrodes result in
very small gas bubbles from the water, especially in the
cathode area. Considering that these gas bubbles are the
basis of electro-flotation, the pollutants can also be
removedfromthewaterbyelectro-flotation during
electrocoagulation. In this way, the electrocoagulation
process can also achieve high removal efficiencies for the
pollutant concentrations by electro-flotation.
The aim of this study was to investigate the removal of
the parameters of COD, chromium (Cr), copper (Cu), zinc
(Zn) and nickel (Ni), which is one of the most important
parameters in treating wastewater from metal plating. The
current density, initial pH and time effects, which are
important parameters affecting the electrocoagulation (EC)
process, were investigated. The effects of pH adjustment
before and after EC were investigated and compared by
cost analysis. At the same time, the removal mechanism to
be introduced was investigated with kinetic model studies.
2 Experimental
2.1 Wastewater characterization
In the experimental studies, industrial wastewater from
metal plating was collected from the entrance channel of
the wastewater treatment plant in the Galvanotechnic
Industrial Site. Wastewaters at this entrance originated
from many industrial sites. Eight-hour composite samples
were collected on a daily basis in order for the samples to
be representative. The characterization of pollutant para-
meters from the collected wastewater is shown in Table 1.
All of the conducted analyzes were performed according to
the methods described by the Standard Methods for the
Examination of Water and Wastewater of the American
Public Health Association (APHA). All heavy metal
analyses in the studies were performed by SM 3111
Table 1 Characteristics of industrial wastewater of raw metal coating
Parameter Wastewater characterization
COD (mg/L) 2100100
Sulfate (mg/L) 150050
Chloride (mg/L) 2500200
Conductivity (mS/cm) 155
Cr (Total) (mg/L) 25010
Cr
+6
(mg/L) 352
Ni (mg/L) 755
Cu (mg/L) 755
Zn (mg/L) 353
Pb (mg/L) <0.1
Fe (mg/L) <0.1
Cd (mg/L) <0.1
pH 1.80.1
2 Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 2019, 13(5): 73
using a Perkin Elmer-branded Atomic Absorption Spectro-
photometer (Germany). A HACH-branded pH probe
(Germany) was used that could read and record pH and
conductivity values in the system (SM 4500 H
+
-B, 2520-
B), and a KERN PFB 300-branded precision scale
(Germany) was used for preparing solutions and weighing
operations for other processes.
2.2 Electrocoagulation assembly
For electrocoagulation (EC) studies, the reactor volume
was 500 mL and made of plexiglass. In separate studies
two different types of electrodes were used, aluminum and
iron. The space between the two electrodes (one anode and
one cathode) was 6.0 cm, and the tanks were stirred. The
effective area of electrodes in electrocoagulation was
10.5 cm 7.5 cm and 16.5 cm 10.5 cm. A GW Instek,
GPS 3030 DD-branded power supply that could stabilize
the current and voltage between 0 to 6 A and 0 to 20 V,
respectively, was used to power the system. A schematic
diagram based on the apparatus used in the study can be
seen in Fig. 1.
During the conducted studies, the pH value of the
wastewater was recorded by a WTW pH 720-branded pH
meter, before, during and after EC. After the EC, the
wastewaters were left for 1 hour by collecting them in
500 mL measuring cylinders for precipitation to occur.
After the precipitation process, samples were collected
from the supernatant and filtered through a coarse filter and
then placed in sample containers. To adjust the pH in the
conducted studies, 1 N and 6 N of NaOH and H
2
SO
4
solutions prepared from Merck-branded NaOH and H
2
SO
4
chemicals were used.
2.3 Kinetic modeling
The adsorption mechanism was considered to be effective
in the removal of pollutants with the metal hydroxides
formed during the EC process. In this sense, the suitability
of the models that characterize the adsorption process was
investigated. Various kinetic models were used, which
were proposed to determine what kind of mechanism
played a role in the adsorption of the adsorbent material
onto the adsorbent surface. Among these models, a Pseudo
First Order kinetic model and a Pseudo Second Order
model were used.
The Pseudo First Order kinetic model was developed by
Lagergren and expressed as follows (Eq. (1)) (Ho, 2004):
logðqe–qtÞ¼logqe–
k1
2:303t, (1)
q
e
= amount of adsorbed matter per gram of adsorbent at
equilibrium (mg/g);
q
t
= amount of adsorbed matter per gram of adsorbent at
any time (mg/g);
k
1
= speed constant (min
–1
);
t= contact time (min).
The speed constant k
1
was calculated from the slope of
the graph drawn from log (q
e
–q
t
) against tand the
theoretical q
e
value was calculated from the break point on
the graph.
The Pseudo Second Order kinetic model was developed
by Ho and expressed as follows (Eq. (2)) (Ho, 2004; Ho,
2006; Qiu et al., 2009):
t
qt
¼1
k2qe2þ1
qe
t, (2)
q
e
= amount of adsorbed matter per gram of adsorbent at
equilibrium (mg/g);
q
t
= amount of adsorbed matter per gram of adsorbent at
any time (mg/g);
k
2
= speed constant (g/mg/min);
k
2
q
e
2
= initial adsorption speed.
The speed constant k
2
and the theoretical q
e
values are
calculated respectively from the slope and breakpoint of
the graph drawn from t/q
t
against t.
3 Results and discussion
3.1 Studies conducted without changing the initial pH
Observing the COD parameter will properly represent the
organic pollution in terms of both reaching the limit values
and examining the efficiency of the process applied to
other pollutant parameters. This study investigated the
effects of current density, initial pH and reaction time.
These are the primary parameters affecting the removal of
Cr, Ni, Cu and Zn metals during the electrocoagulation
process, especially in a high concentration of wastewater
and in COD removal. In this part of the study, the removal
efficiencies of the pollutants were calculated without
changing the pH of the effluent samples.
Fig. 1 Schematic diagram of electrocoagulation process
(1: EC Cell, 2: Electrodes, 3: Power Supply, 4: Magnetic Stirrer,
5: pH meter).
Fatih Ilhan et al. Kinetic modelling of electrocoagulation process for metal plating wastewater 3
Firstly, the effect of current density without changing the
initial pH of the wastewater was investigated. COD
removal efficiencies for both iron electrodes and aluminum
electrodes for current densities from 50 to 175 A/m
2
are
shown in Fig. 2. In this study, the reaction time was taken
to be 15 minutes.
As understood from Fig. 1, there is no major change in
the removal efficiencies by increasing the current density.
Approximately 80%removal efficiencies were achieved
for the iron electrodes, and 70%for the aluminum
electrodes. At 100 A/m
2
,effluent removal rates were
the highest for both electrodes, so a current density of
100 A/m
2
was selected as the optimum value to be used in
further studies. Changes in pH values were investigated
after the EC process without changing the raw wastewater
pH value. The results obtained are shown in Fig. 3. The
wastewater pH value of 1.8 before the EC process,
increased up to 4.08 by the end after 40 minutes, and the
effluent pH for the aluminum electrode was 5.8 when the
iron electrode was used. The relatively high pH values
obtained with the aluminum electrode reveal more
advantageous results for the precipitation of heavy metals
after EC.
The reaction time of the EC process between 1 and
40 minutes was investigated for both the iron and
aluminum electrodes in order to investigate the effect of
the reaction time, which is another important parameter
(Fig. 3). This study was conducted without changing the
initial pH. Figure 4 shows that removal efficiencies with
the iron electrode are more efficient, with an average of
between 10%and 15%more than with aluminum
electrodes. Optimum results were obtained in the first
minutes of the EC study. At the end of the first minute,
80%removal efficiency was achieved with iron electrodes
and 68.6%with aluminum electrodes. Although 84.8%
was reached with the iron electrodes after 30 minutes, it
can not be considered the optimum value in terms of
economy. It can be said that the high removal efficiency
during the first minutes is due to the continued adsorption
of pollutants by the metal hydroxides produced by EC
during the precipitation process. The effective process here
is considered to be the adsorption onto the metal
hydroxide.
The common removal method of heavy metals is carried
out by precipitation in the form of metal hydroxides and
high pH. The most important operating parameter for metal
removal is considered to be the pH. It is very difficult to
remove metals at low pH values. As a result, the study was
conducted to show both the effect of low pH and the effect
of time on the removal of metals, as shown in Fig. 5. The
removal of Cu, Ni, Zn and Cr was noted.
Considering the characterization of wastewater, one of
the most common heavy metals is copper. In this study, the
electrocoagulation process was performed at the original
pH (~1.8) using commonly used iron and aluminum
electrodes. When Fig. 4(a) is analyzed, it can observed that
although the same results were obtained for both electrodes
in the first 15 minutes, removal rates at an 80%level were
achieved for iron electrodes for this process, whereas for
aluminum electrodes, the efficiency is at a 50%level.
In the facility where the wastewater is generated, nickel-
plating processes are carried out intensively. In this case,
nickel forms part of the wastewater. In the studies
conducted, both the iron and aluminum electrodes were
used to analyze the ability to remove nickel simultaneously
with other components. The results obtained are given in
Fig. 5(b).
Fig. 2 The effect of current density on COD removal for iron and
aluminum electrode (Reaction time 15 min, pH 1.8, sample
volume 500 mL).
Fig. 3 pH effluent values at the end of EC applied with original
initial pH.
Fig. 4 The effect of electrode type on COD removal with
electrocoagulation (V: 500 mL, pH; ~1.8, Current density:
100 A/m
2
).
4 Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 2019, 13(5): 73
When Fig. 5(b) is examined, it can be observed that a
removal of Ni at a 50%level could be achieved. However,
it should be noted that the original pH (pH ~1.8) value of
the plant was used in this study. As a matter of fact, the
metals are treated by using their ability to precipitate in the
form of metal hydroxides, especially when the pH value is
almost over 11. Therefore, studies were carried out at the
optimum pH values (partially neutral) required for
electrocoagulation and at the high pH values applied for
metal removal.
Chromium is different from conventional heavy metals
and the treatment is a two-stage process. According to the
conventional chromium removal process, Cr
6+
s, which is
in a dangerous form in the water must be converted into
Cr
3+
by a controlled process. While this first stage is
carried out at low pH values, Cr
3+
s must be precipitated in
the second stage. The need for high pH values in this case
makes heavy metal removal extra difficult. In electro-
coagulation, it is aimed to perform these two operations in
one stage. The results obtained are demonstrated in
Fig. 5(c). Total chromium removal efficiencies for
aluminum and iron electrodes used for the different types
are shown in Fig. 5(c). Over 90%removal efficiency can
be achieved especially with the use of iron electrodes. The
main reason for this can be explained by the fact that the
raw pH of the wastewater is about 2 as a result of the
electrolytic reactions, and therefore Cr
6+
is converted to
Cr
3+
in a very short time due to the ferric ions given to the
water by the iron electrode. In this way, it is possible to
remove Cr
3+
only by increasing the pH or with the
electrocoagulation process.
As in other metal types, zinc is also present in high
concentration in the raw wastewater emerging from the
plating workshops and arriving at the treatment plant due
to the intensive zinc-coating operations. The study stages
for the removal of zinc were carried out for the other metal
parameters. Figure 5(d) shows the effects of different
electrode types on the removal of zinc. Iron and aluminum
electrodes show significant similarity with respect to
efficiency. With both types of electrodes, a removal rate
of 50%could be achieved. It should be noted, however,
that this study was carried out at the original pH and
without any pH adjustment. It is thought that the efficiency
can be increased with pH adjustment.
3.2 The effect of pH adjustment on COD removal efficiency
The electrocoagulation process is based on the chemical
precipitation mechanism. Simultaneously, the adsorption,
oxidation and flotation mechanisms are partially effective,
resulting in effective removal of different pollutants. Each
of these mechanisms alone is particularly closely related to
the pH parameter. In addition to the previous studies
performed with the original pH, the initial pH values were
Fig. 5 The effect of electrode type on (a) Copper, (b) Nickel, (c) Total Chromium and (d) Zinc removal with electrocoagulation
(V: 500 mL, pH; ~1.8, Current density: 100 A/m
2
).
Fatih Ilhan et al. Kinetic modelling of electrocoagulation process for metal plating wastewater 5
adjusted and their effects on the efficiency were investi-
gated at this stage of the study.
In the previous section, the removal efficiencies after the
EC process were given and no pH adjustment was
performed after the EC process. In this part of the study,
the pH adjustment before the EC process and the pH
adjustment after the EC process were compared. Iron
electrodes were selected for the study as they showed more
effective results; these results are given in Table 2. The
initial and effluent pH values were adjusted to a pH value
from 6 to 12 at which metals could be precipitated.
Although there was a partial increase in the effluent pH
values due to the electrocoagulation mechanism itself, an
additional pH adjustment was implemented. When Table 2
is examined, it is observed that higher removal rates are
achieved with the adjustment of pH after EC. When the
results obtained for pH 8 in the table are examined, it is
found that the removal of COD, Zn, Cr, Ni and Cu were
achieved at levels of 45.6%, 98.3%,95%,56%and 26.6%,
respectively, with the adjustment of pH before the EC
process, and levels of 67%, 93.9%, 96.9%,72%and 91.7%
were achieved when the pH was adjusted after EC. In
general, the removal efficiencies are higher with the pH
adjustment after EC. The major factor here is that the metal
hydroxides formed in the EC process adsorb the metals.
3.3 Kinetic modeling
The studies conducted show that removal can be achieved
by the adsorption of metals on the metal hydroxides
produced by the EC process as well as the precipitation of
metals by pH adjustment in the removal of COD. Kinetic
modeling was applied from this perspective in order to
prove this mechanism. Table 3 shows the results of Pseudo
first order and Pseudo second order kinetic models.
Considering the regression coefficients, the R
2
s obtained
for both kinetic models are observed to be quite high. The
Pseudo second order kinetic model can be said to be
compatible for the removal of both COD and metals as the
R
2
values of the Pseudo second order kinetic model were
higher. This case shows that the metals are removed by
chemisorption (Ho and McKay, 1998; Kumar et al., 2010).
In addition, the adsorption capacities of iron hydroxides
produced in the EC process are given in Table 3. When
adsorption capacities are compared, it is observed that the
highest adsorbed pollutant parameter is COD. When heavy
metals are compared, Cr had the highest capacity to be
adsorbed and was followed by Cu>Ni>Zn.
Al-Shannag et al. applied kinetic modeling in their study
on electrocoagulation treatment of metal-plating water
treatment (Al-Shannag et al., 2015). According to the
regression coefficient neither the first order nor the second
order kinetic models were applicable for Cr, Ni and Zn,
whereas copper ions were suitable with first order kinetics.
However, the study showed that the first order pseudo
kinetics matched all metal ions. For Cu, Ni and Zn, the
obtained k
1
coefficients were 0.053, 0.113, 0.099 min
–1
,
respectively. In the study by Kim et al., the removal of
metal-plating wastewater with PAC and modified PAC was
examined (Kim et al., 2018). According to the kinetic
results, both adsorbents showed that the Pseudo second
order kinetic modeling was suitable and also claimed that
the adsorption process was performed by chemisorption.
3.4 Energy consumption of electrocoagulation process
The total electrical and chemical costs of the process were
calculated and the pH adjustments before and after EC
were also compared. As the iron electrodes were more
efficient, calculations were made for the iron electrodes. A
current of 1.13 A and a constant voltage of 17 V were used
for the optimum current density 100 A/m
2
. The optimum
reaction time was chosen to be 15 minutes and the
calculations were carried out in a way to adjust the pH
value of the wastewater to be 8.
The operational cost of the electrocoagulation, accord-
ing to the steps of this study, can be given as follows:
EC operation cost: ðIVtÞ=V¼1:13 17 ð15=
=60Þ=0:5L¼9.61 W/L of wastewater = 9.61 kW/m
3
of
wastewater.
Considering that the prescribed unit electricity con-
sumption price for industrial or commercial facilities is
0.066 $/kWh, the cost for 1 m
3
of wastewater treatment is
as follows:
Table 2 The effect of pH adjustment before EC and pH adjustment after EC on the pollutant removal (V: 500 mL, Reaction time: 15 min, Iron
electrode, Current Density: 100 A/m
2
)
pH
COD (%)Cu(%)Ni(%) Total Cr (%)Zn(%)
Before EC After EC Before EC After EC Before EC After EC Before EC After EC Before EC After EC
6 55.3 65 30.4 90.5 49.6 47.8 97.7 97.6 94 91.1
7 50 65 26.5 90.9 46.2 65.7 97.3 97.3 98.1 93.6
8 45.5 67 26.6 91.7 56 72 95 96.9 98.3 93.9
9 38 69 19.8 92.5 28.4 72.3 94 96.4 97.7 94.2
10 30.1 89 17.9 93 27.8 79.2 93 96.5 98.9 94.4
12 32.9 89 66.4 93 61.6 79 93.9 96.4 96 95.1
6 Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 2019, 13(5): 73
EC operational cost = 9.61 kW/m
3
0.066 $/kW =
0.634 $/ m
3
.
The pH value for the raw water used for EC was
confirmed to be 1.8. A 5.3 mL amount of 6 N NaOH
solution was used to change the pH before EC to a pH of 8.
To change the pH after EC to a pH of 8, 4.8 mL of 6 N
NaOH solution was used. According to this, while the
amount of caustic wastewater that is used pre-EC and to
increase the pH value to 8, is 1.27 kg/m
3
, the amount of
caustic wastewater used post-EC was 1.15 kg/m
3
.
As the unit price of experimental quality NaOH is
1 $/kg, the cost required to increase the pH value of 1 m
3
of
wastewater to 8 is 1.27 $/m
3
for pre-EC and 1.15 $/m
3
for
post-EC. Accordingly, the total cost for the process
conducted with the pH adjustment before and after EC is
1.90 $/m
3
and 1.78 $/m
3
. These values are approximately 4
to 5 times lower than published literature (Rodriguez et al.,
2007; Oden and Sari-Erkan, 2018).
4 Conclusions
As the wastewater exhibits oxidation mechanisms, flota-
tion mechanisms and the formation of flocs, their presence
provides an important environment for other processes to
be carried out after the EC process. The most important of
these is the chemical consumption required for pH
adjustment to meet discharge standards. The current
density, pH and the reaction time, which are important
parameters for EC, were studied and it was observed that
current density had no significant effect on metal removal.
One of the expected effluents increases the initial pH of the
EC process. When the iron and aluminum electrodes were
compared, iron was excellent in removing chromium and
copper. Furthermore, while aluminum and iron electrodes
had a similar effect in the removal of Zn with a 50%
removal efficiency, both electrodes were weak in eliminat-
ing Ni with less than a 40%removal efficiency. In addition,
they were found to be very effective in removing both
COD and heavy metals even over very short periods (1
minute). When kinetic modeling was applied, pseudo
second order kinetics was found to be more suitable. This
proves that the metal hydroxides formed during the EC
process remove heavy metals by adsorption. The relative
rates of adsorption of the heavy metals was seen to be
Cr>Cu>Ni>Zn. According to the cost analysis, it was
found that the pH adjustment after the EC process
decreased the chemical use and was 1.78 $/m
3
.
Acknowledgements The authors received research grants from the
Research Fund of the Republic of Turkey Ministry of Industry and
Technology with a Project Number 0274.STZ-2013-2.
References
Ahangarnokolaei M A, Ganjidoust H, Ayati B (2018). Optimization of
parameters of electrocoagulation/flotation process for removal of
Acid Red 14 with mesh stainless steel electrodes. Journal of Water
Reuse and Desalination, 8(2): 278–292
Al-Shannag M, Al-Qodah Z, Bani-Melhem K, Qtaishat M R, Alkasrawi
M (2015). Heavy metal ions removal from metal plating wastewater
using electrocoagulation: Kinetic study and process performance.
Chemical Engineering Journal, 260: 749–756
Avsar Y, Kurt U, Gonullu T (2007). Comparison of classical chemical
and electrochemical processes for treating rose processing waste-
water. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 148(1–2): 340–345
Can B Z, Boncukcuoglu R, Bayar S, Bayhan Y K (2016). Influence of
operating parameters on the arsenic and boron removal by
electrocoagulation. Journal of the Chemical Society of Pakistan,
38(5): 843–849
Choi K, Meier P G (2001). Toxicity evaluation of metal plating
wastewater employing the Microtox assay: A comparison with
cladocerans and fish. Environmental Toxicology, 16(2): 136–141
Choi K, Zong M, Meier P G (2000). Application of a fish DNA damage
assay as a biological toxicity screening tool for metal plating
wastewater. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 19(1): 242–
247
Coskun T, Ilhan F, Demir N M, Debik E, Kurt U (2012). Optimization of
energy costs in the pretreatment of olive mill wastewaters by
electrocoagulation. Environmental Technology, 33(7): 801–807
Deghles A, Kurt U (2016). Treatment of tannery wastewater by a hybrid
electrocoagulation/electrodialysis process. Chemical Engineering
and Processing: Process Intensification, 104: 43–50
Hashim K S, Shaw A, Al Khaddar R, Ortoneda Pedrola M O, Phipps D
(2017). Defluoridation of drinking water using a new flow column
electrocoagulation reactor (FCER): Experimental, statistical, and
economic approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 197:
80–8848
Hashim M A, Chu K H (2004). Biosorption of cadmium by brown,
Table 3 Pseudo 1st order and Pseudo 2nd order kinetic modeling for EC prosess
Parameter Pseudo 1st order Pseudo 2nd order
R
2
q
e1
(mg/g) k
1
(min
–1
)R
2
q
e2
(mg/g) k
2
(g/mg/min)
COD 0.936 9418.84 0.993 0.978 282.3 –0.00002
Cu 0.936 666.04 0.993 0.976 19.36 –0.0003
Ni 0.968 578.94 0.993 0.972 18.21 –0.0003
Cr 0.956 2259.01 0.993 0.957 58.96 –0.0001
Zn 0.950 419.00 0.992 0.967 11.59 –0.0004
Fatih Ilhan et al. Kinetic modelling of electrocoagulation process for metal plating wastewater 7
green, and red seaweeds. Chemical Engineering Journal, 97(2–3):
249–255
Ho Y S (2004). Citation review of Lagergren kinetic rate equation on
adsorption reactions. Scientometrics, 59(1): 171–177
Ho Y S (2006). Review of second-order models for adsorption systems.
Journal of Hazardous Materials, 136(3): 681–689
Ho Y S, McKay G (1998). A comparison of chemisorption kinetic
models applied to pollutant removal on various sorbents. Process
Safety and Environmental Protection, 76(4 B4): 332–340
Huang R M, He J Y, Zhao J, Luo Q, Huang C M (2011). Fenton-
biological treatment of reverse osmosis membrane concentrate from a
metal plating wastewater recycle system. Environmental Technology,
32(5): 515–522
Ilhan F, Kurt U, Apaydin O, Gonullu M T (2008). Treatment of leachate
by electrocoagulation using aluminum and iron electrodes. Journal of
Hazardous Materials, 154(1–3): 381–389
Kim T K, Kim T, Choe W S, Kim M K, Jung Y J, Zoh K D (2018).
Removal of heavy metals in electroplating wastewater by powdered
activated carbon (PAC) and sodium diethyldithiocarbamate-modified
PAC. Environmental Engineering Research, 23(3): 301–308
Kobya M, Akyol A, Demirbas E, Oncel M S (2014). Removal of arsenic
from drinking water by batch and continuous electrocoagulation
processes using hybrid Al-Fe plate electrodes. Environmental
Progress & Sustainable Energy, 33(1): 131–140
Kumar P S, Vincent C, Kirthika K, Kumar K S (2010). Kinetics and
equilibrium studies of Pb
2+
in removal from aqueous solutions by
use of nano-silversol-coated activated carbon. Brazilian Journal of
Chemical Engineering, 27(2): 339–346
Lee C G, Lee S, Park J A, Park C, Lee S J, Kim S B, An B, Yun S T, Lee
S H, Choi J W (2017). Removal of copper, nickel and chromium
mixtures from metal plating wastewater by adsorption with modified
carbon foam. Chemosphere, 166: 203–211
Lee C G, Song M K, Ryu J C, Park C, Choi J W, Lee S H (2016).
Application of carbon foam for heavy metal removal from industrial
plating wastewater and toxicity evaluation of the adsorbent. Chemo-
sphere, 153: 1–9
Maher E, O'Malley K N, Heffron J, Huo J, Wang Y, Mayer B K,
McNamara P (2019). Removal of estrogenic compounds via iron
electrocoagulation: Impact of water quality and assessment of
removal mechanism. Environmental Science: Water Research&
Technology, 5: 956–966
Martins R J E, Pardo R, Boaventura R A R (2004). Cadmium(II) and
zinc(II) adsorption by the aquatic moss Fontinalis antipyretica: Effect
of temperature, pH and water hardness. Water Research, 38(3): 693–
699
Naje A S, Chelliapan S, Zakaria Z, Ajeel M A, Alaba P A (2017). A
review of electrocoagulation technology for the treatment of textile
wastewater. Reviews in Chemical Engineering, 33(3): 263–292
Oden M K, Sari-Erkan H (2018). Treatment of metal plating wastewater
using iron electrode by electrocoagulation process: Optimization and
process performance. Process Safety and Environmental Protection,
119: 207–217
Qi Z L, Zhang J N, You S J (2018). Effect of placement angles on
wireless electrocoagulation for bipolar aluminum electrodes. Fron-
tiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 12 (3): 9
Qiu H, Lv L, Pan B C, Zhang Q J, Zhang W M, Zhang Q X (2009).
Critical review in adsorption kinetic models. Journal of Zhejiang
University. Science A, 10(5): 716–724
Rodriguez J, StopićS, Krause G, Friedrich B (2007). Feasibility
assessment of electrocoagulation towards a new sustainable waste-
water treatment. Environmental Science and Pollution Research
International, 14(7): 477–482
Song P P, Yang Z H, Xu H Y, Huang J, Yang X, Yue F, Wang L K
(2016). Arsenic removal from contaminated drinking water by
electrocoagulation using hybrid Fe-Al electrodes: response surface
methodology and mechanism study. Desalination and Water Treat-
ment, 57(10): 4548–4556
Ulucan K, Kurt U (2015). Comparative study of electrochemical
wastewater treatment processes for bilge water as oily wastewater: A
kinetic approach. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, 747: 104–
111
Vasudevan S, Lakshmi J, Sozhan G (2009). Optimization of the process
parameters for the removal of phosphate from drinking water by
electrocoagulation. Desalination and Water Treatment, 12(1–3): 407–
414
Vasudevan S, Sozhan G, Ravichandran S, Jayaraj J, Lakshmi J, Sheela S
M (2008). Studies on the removal of phosphate from drinking water
by electrocoagulation process. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry
Research, 47(6): 2018–2023
Xu D, Li Y, Yin L F, Ji Y Y, Niu J F, Yu Y X (2018). Electrochemical
removal of nitrate in industrial wastewater. Frontiers of Environ-
mental Science & Engineering, 12 (1): 9
8 Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 2019, 13(5): 73