No full-text available
To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the author.
Herbert Simon : pour un bilan raisonné du cognitivisme
Abstract
Herbert Simon, par sa critique du rationalisme simpliste sous-jacent au mainstream économique et aux approches fonctionnalistes ou tayloriennes de la gestion, a ouvert la voie à une science expérimentale des organisations. Toutefois, le courant cognitiviste qu’il a ainsi inauguré, fondé sur les concepts de décision comme traitement de l’information, représentation, computation et partage cognitif, a consolidé une vision non située, peu processuelle et peu relationnelle des organisations. Il constitue aujourd’hui une référence dominante quoique souvent tacite de l’étude des organisations. L’élaboration d’une alternative processuelle et relationnelle passe par la déconstruction des concepts cognitivistes, en s’appuyant notamment sur la pensée pragmatiste.
... However, despite the centrality of practice in design thinking theory, practice theory is virtually absent in the design thinking nomenclature. While there is much diversity among practice theories, they generally emphasize the processual nature of practice (Simpson, 2009), and the idea that practices are situated and embodied which contrasts with the cognitivist view which positions practice as a consequence of decisionmaking (Lorino, 2019). Within this practice turn, pragmatism is seen as offering new ways to engage with practice to emphasize its creative and emergent character and avoid problematic separations between the individual and the collective, and between thinking and doing (Simpson, 2009). ...
Design thinking is based on designers’ creative ways of working and is defined as a formal method for creative problem solving aimed at fostering innovation by harnessing “the designer’s sensibility and methods.” The basic premise is that design “thinking” can be extracted and separated from the situated practice of designing in the studio. This approach has given rise to a widely accepted nomenclature for describing design which has improved communication between designers and managers, leading to massive interest in adoption of design thinking in management settings. However, due to a widespread implicit cognitivism in the literature, scholars find it difficult to explain the cultural and experiential qualities of design thinking and it tends to be presented as a fundamentally cognitive, problem-solving activity. We argue that these cognitivist tendencies preclude proper attention to and theorization of designers’ creative practice. We contend that the absence of a theory of practice prevents a deeper understanding of the contribution of design thinking to innovation, loses sight of the sensibility on which it relies, and hampers realization of the promise of design thinking. We develop an alternative theoretical perspective, grounded in a pragmatist theory of practice and the studio culture from which designers’ creative practice developed. This theoretical perspective allows design thinking to be understood as sensemaking, foregrounds imagination and improvisation as its core activities, and explains how sensibility is developed and nurtured. We review the design thinking literature through this pragmatist lens and discuss the implications for theory and practice of conceptualizing design thinking as sensemaking.
Organizational design traditionally refers to the idea that managers can help organizations
respond to changes and improve efficiency by redefining structures and procedures. In this
dissertation, I suggest an alternative and more dynamic view of organizational design based
on insights from pragmatism, design theory, and organization theory. Specifically, leveraging
insights about the social nature of organizations with the imaginative nature of design, I
argue that pragmatism is best suited to combine organization and design. Organizations can
be understood through the pragmatist concept of habits, while the organizational design
processes can be theorized through the pragmatist concept of inquiry. The thesis consists of
four chapters.
In Chapter 2, I (with co-authors Katharina Dittrich and Davide Nicolini) explore the rationalist
perspectives on organization design and how these led to stability-centered assumptions. I
then review post-rationalist alternatives, that already offer more dynamic perspectives on
organizing, designing, and organization design.
In Chapter 3, I (with co-author Vern Glaser) explore the topic of designing organizational
routines. I show that organization and design theories use dominant cognitive and latent
pragmatist perspectives. Although practice-based, process, and Design Inquiry perspectives
all have existing links with pragmatism, a full-fledged pragmatist approach to these topics is
lacking, and researchers have limited themselves to specific concepts and theories from
pragmatism. The chapter thus foregrounds the need to fully develop research approaches
and methodologies that build on pragmatism and problematize the theoretical assumptions
underlying routine design – and organization design more broadly.
In Chapter 4, I (with co-author Philippe Lorino) develop a pragmatist methodology for
researching organizational design. I explore how researchers can support practitioners in
creating innovative change in organizations. The chapter combines inquiry, community, and
dialogue with withness. This allows researchers to engage with practical problems and how
to improve problematic situations with practitioners.
In Chapter 5, I (with co-authors Katharina Dittrich and Davide Nicolini) develop a dynamic
perspective on organizational design. By drawing on the pragmatist concepts of habits and
inquiry, I problematize the existing cognitive assumptions about organization design. I
instead propose pragmatist organizational design as a continuous process of redesigning
habits through inquiry. This dynamic approach to organizational design better explains the
dynamics of organizational change.
Scholars have long sought to impact management practice. However, the current conceptualization of impact is grounded in dualisms, separating researchers from managers, means from ends, and thought from action. Such a dualistic understanding of impact hampers researchers' and managers' ability to achieve impact. Nowhere is this issue more acute than in the context of grand challenges, which require researchers and managers to work together closely. As a way forward, we propose a pragmatist perspective on impact, where impact is not seen as a one-time, unidirectional event, but rather as a relational and recursive process. By overcoming dualisms in traditional approaches to impact, pragmatist impacting can help advance progress on grand challenges and our current understanding of cocreation. In this paper, we illustrate pragmatist impacting and reflect on its opportunities and challenges through our experience at Innovation North, an innovation lab that brought together researchers and managers to cocreate a systems innovation process.
Résumé:
Au cours des dernières années, et notamment à la lumière des évolutions spectaculaires de l’utilisation de plus en plus accrue des TIC dans le travail gouvernemental, la modernisation administrative en Algérie est devenue un objet d’étude d’une grande importance. Les transformations survenues dans le monde et, par conséquent, dans les modes d’exercice des mécanismes de gouvernance et de gestion des activités institutionnelles, ont ainsi engendré un changement substantiel, non seulement dans les branches d’activité économique, mais aussi dans le domaine de l'administration centrale et locale, du système judiciaire, de la Poste et des Télécommunications, des finances, de l’enseignement…etc. La prise de conscience de la nécessité des changements organisationnels induits par la modernisation a en effet accéléré le processus qui, faut-il le signaler, a tardé à opérer son ancrage, évitant ainsi les différents problèmes qui causent les dissonances temporelles de mise en œuvre de la modernisation.
Dans ce contexte, la présente thèse vise à étudier les orientations stratégiques, conditions, les mécanismes et les événements ayant caractérisé le processus de modernisation dans les organisations publiques algériennes, et ce, en vue d’identifier les différents facteurs responsables de la lenteur de la mise en œuvre du changement visant cette modernisation. Et sur cette base, nous proposons des approches et démarches déjà éprouvées afin d’accélérer ce processus et de l’entourer des précautions de son aboutissement. Notre travail de recherche est édifié sur des bases théoriques qui ont pour but de présenter les différentes étapes de transformation et de conduite de l’administration publique vers sa modernisation, mais aussi de mettre en évidence le processus de la modernisation selon une optique de changement organisationnel tenant compte des exigences et des spécificités au sein des organisations publiques. Suivant une approche hypothético-déductive, soutenue par une méthodologie d’inférence causale, nous avons présenté nos hypothèses de recherche, et afin de les tester sur le plan pratique, une analyse documentaire est effectuée sur les processus de modernisation entrepris par quatre ministères Algériens (MICLAT, MPTTN, JUSTICE, MESRS), cette analyse est appuyée ensuite par un questionnaire comme outil d’investigation sur les conditions, les écueils et les paramètres ayant caractérisé le déroulement de ces processus. La méthode des équations structurelles "SEM", nous a ainsi permis de tester notre modèle d’analyse et de présenter nos résultats.
Enfin, les résultats statistiques d’enquête nous ont permis de conclure que la vitesse de la mise en œuvre du processus de modernisation dans les organisations publiques Algériennes est tributaire de différents facteurs ; à savoir : la culture organisationnelle, le climat organisationnel, la perception du contenu de modernisation par les fonctionnaires et leur prédisposition à faire le changement. Les dispositifs de la conduite du changement constituent également des facteurs à impact significatif sur la conduite de ces processus.
Abstract:
In recent years, and especially in the light of the spectacular evolution in the increasing use of ICT in government work, administrative modernization in Algeria has become a subject of study of great importance. The transformations that have taken place in the world and, consequently, in the modes of exercise of the mechanisms of governance and management of institutional activities, have thus engendered a substantial change, not only in the branches of economic activity, but also in the domain of central and local administration, the judicial system, Post and Telecommunications, finance, education… Awareness of the need for organizational changes induced by modernization has indeed accelerated the process which, it should be pointed out, has been slow to take root, thus avoiding the various problems that cause the temporal dissonances in the implementation of modernization.
In this context, the present thesis aims to study the strategic orientations, conditions, mechanisms and events that have characterized the process of modernization in Algerian public organizations, this is done in order to identify the different factors responsible for the slowness of the implementation of the change aimed at this modernization. And on this basis, we offer already proven approaches and procedures in order to accelerate this process and surround it with precautions for its completion.
Our research work is built on theoretical bases which aim to present the different stages of transformation and conduct of the public administration towards its modernization, but also to highlight the process of modernization according to an organizational change perspective taking into account the requirements and specificities within public organizations. Following a hypothetico-deductive approach, supported by a causal inference methodology, we presented our research hypotheses, and in order to test them practically, a documentary analysis is carried out on the modernization processes undertaken by four Algerian ministries (the Ministry of Interior, the Ministry of Post and Telecommunications, the Ministry of Justice and the Ministry of Higher Education), this analysis is then supported by a questionnaire as an investigation tool on the conditions, the pitfalls and parameters that have characterized the conduct of these processes. The "SEM" structural equation method thus allowed us to test our analysis model and present our results.
Finally, the statistical results of the survey allowed us to conclude that the speed of implementation of the modernization process in Algerian public organizations depends on various factors; namely: the organizational culture, organizational climate, public servants’ perception of modernization content and their predisposition to make the change. The devices of change management also constitute factors with a significant impact on the management of these processes.
The aim of this article is to highlight the reasons why French sociology, and more particularly that of work organizations, has neglected the study of emotions. The demonstration is based on the hypothesis of joint developments in the study of emotions and organizations in the fields of psychology and sociology, mainly in France and the United States. This shows three types of approaches corresponding to three periods : utilitarian-physiological (1870-1960), cognitive‑strategic (1955‑1980), and constructive-psychodynamic (1980-2000). The article emphasizes that the study of emotions in France did not develop until the turn of the twenty-first century, through the analysis of work organizations, with the constructive-psychodynamic approach providing a critical perspective on the emotional prescription and responses to the problems of suffering at work.
Se mettre dans les pas d’Edgar Morin et cheminer à ses côtés représente pour nous, enseignants chercheurs, une aventure intellectuelle riche d’apports multidisciplinaires pour construire et élaborer nos travaux. Nous sommes entrés par la porte de l’écologie de l’action et y avons trouvé la théorie de la complexité que nous qualifions de paradigme de la transversalité et de la reliance. L’écologie de l’action se présente ici comme étant une alternative au modèle de l’agir rationnel et instrumental. Elle se traduit dans les travaux de Christophe Schmitt par la théorisation de l’agir entrepreneurial dont l’action est finalisée et se construit chemin faisant au sein d’un écosystème, et dans ceux de Philippe Lorino comme étant une action qui se déploie dans un écosystème dans l’objectif d’atteindre un but mais dont la réussite n’est pas certaine, elle est de l’ordre de l’aléatoire. Nous nous référons à ces deux modèles pour élaborer nos problématiques de recherche et orienter nos résultats. L’écologie de l’action complexe et plus globalement le paradigme de la complexité outre qu’il se présente comme étant un modèle de référence pour nos travaux, il incarne également pour nous une grille de lecture qui nous permet de donner du sens pour appréhender et comprendre les multiples événements que nous rencontrons au cours de notre vie.
L’introduction des « éducations à » dans le curriculum scolaire vient, entre autres bouleversements, questionner l’idéal cartésien selon lequel les problèmes, dans la recherche, les métiers ou l’école, peuvent toujours être construits et résolus par des méthodes bien définies et leurs solutions évaluables selon des critères objectifs. Avec la prise en compte des questions socialement vives, l’école s’ouvre au traitement de problèmes mal structurés, flous et même pernicieux. Peut-on tirer, de l’analyse de travaux anglo-saxons sur le sujet, des repères épistémologiques pour le traitement didactique de tels problèmes qui sont caractéristiques du monde problématique qui est le nôtre et auquel il faut préparer le futur citoyen ?
Reflecting on his wartime government service, Walter Lippmann (1922) developed a theory of policy formulation and error. Introducing the constructs of stereotype, mental model, blind spots, and the process of manufacturing consent, his theory prescribed interdisciplinary social science as a tool for enhancing policy making in business and government. Lippmann used his influence with the Rockefeller foundations, business leaders, Harvard and the University of Chicago to gain support for this program. Citation analysis of references to "stereotype" and Lippmann reveals the rapid spread of the concept across the social sciences and in public discourse paralleled by obliteration by incorporation of the wider theory in behavioral science. "Stereotype" is increasingly invoked in anthropology, economics, and sociology though Lippmann and his wider theory ceased being cited decades ago. In psychology, citations are increasing but content analysis revealed blind spots and misconceptions about the theory and prescription. Studies of heuristics, biases, and organizational decision substantiate Lippmann's theory of judgment and choice. But his model for social science failed to consider the bounded rationality and blind spots of its practitioners. Policy formulation today is supported by research from narrow disciplinary silos not interdisciplinary science that reflects an awareness of history.
THE CNS IS A SERIAL INFORMATION PROCESSOR THAT MUST SERVE AN ORGANISM ENDOWED WITH MULTIPLE NEEDS, AND LIVING IN AN ENVIRONMENT THAT PRESENTS UNPREDICTABLE THREATS AND OPPORTUNITIES. THESE REQUIREMENTS ARE MET BY 2 MECHANISMS: (1) GOAL-TERMINATING MECHANISMS, PERMITTING GOALS TO BE PROCESSED SERIALLY WITHOUT ANY 1 MONOPOLIZING THE PROCESSOR, AND (2) INTERRUPTION MECHANISM, HAVING THE PROPERTIES USUALLY ASCRIBED TO EMOTION, ALLOWING THE PROCESSOR TO RESPOND TO URGENT NEEDS IN REAL TIME. MECHANISMS OF THESE KINDS, TO CONTROL THE DIRECTION OF ATTENTION AND ACTIVITY, HAVE BEEN INCORPORATED IN SOME INFORMATION-PROCESSING THEORIES OF HUMAN COGNITION, AND THEIR FURTHER ELABORATION WILL PERMIT THESE THEORIES TO EXPLAIN WIDER RANGES OF BEHAVIOR. (16 REF.)
How has Japan become a major economic power, a world leader in the automotive and electronics industries? What is the secret of their success? The consensus has been that, though the Japanese are not particularly innovative, they are exceptionally skilful at imitation, at improving products that already exist. But now two leading Japanese business experts, Ikujiro Nonaka and Hiro Takeuchi, turn this conventional wisdom on its head: Japanese firms are successful, they contend, precisely because they are innovative, because they create new knowledge and use it to produce successful products and technologies. Examining case studies drawn from such firms as Honda, Canon, Matsushita, NEC, 3M, GE, and the U.S. Marines, this book reveals how Japanese companies translate tacit to explicit knowledge and use it to produce new processes, products, and services.
Herbert Simon's classic work on artificial intelligence in the expanded and updated third edition from 1996, with a new introduction by John E. Laird.
Herbert Simon's classic and influential The Sciences of the Artificial declares definitively that there can be a science not only of natural phenomena but also of what is artificial. Exploring the commonalities of artificial systems, including economic systems, the business firm, artificial intelligence, complex engineering projects, and social plans, Simon argues that designed systems are a valid field of study, and he proposes a science of design. For this third edition, originally published in 1996, Simon added new material that takes into account advances in cognitive psychology and the science of design while confirming and extending the book's basic thesis: that a physical symbol system has the necessary and sufficient means for intelligent action.
Simon won the Nobel Prize for Economics in 1978 for his research into the decision-making process within economic organizations and the Turing Award (considered by some the computer science equivalent to the Nobel) with Allen Newell in 1975 for contributions to artificial intelligence, the psychology of human cognition, and list processing. The Sciences of the Artificial distills the essence of Simon's thought accessibly and coherently. This reissue of the third edition makes a pioneering work available to a new audience.
Cet article entend dégager la contribution de la sociologie à une conception sociale de l’esprit. Il le fait en cherchant à justifier l’idée selon laquelle agir c’est penser. La validité de deux postulats y est d’abord examinée : l’externalisme du mental et le holisme des significations, dans leur version sociologique. L’article analyse ensuite les trois régimes de l’activité pratique de connaissance : certitude, conviction, directéité. Il montre enfin comment la sociologie analytique rend observable l’usage que les individus font de critères d’objectivation (des objets, des événements ou des motifs d’autrui) qui organisent ces «pratiques inférentielles directes » qui se déclenchent immédiatement dans l’action afin d’assurer l’accomplissement de la coordination de l’action. Cet article permet ainsi de confronter les propositions d’une théorie sociologique de la connaissance à celles des sciences cognitives.
The development of pragmatist thought (Peirce, James, Dewey, and Mead) in the first half of the twentieth century in the United States deeply impacted political science, semiotics, philosophy, psychology, sociology, education, law. Later intellectual trends (analytical philosophy, structuralism, cognitivism) focusing on rational representations or archetypical models somehow sidelined Pragmatism for three decades. In the world of organizations, they often conveyed the Cartesian dream of rational control, which became the mainstream view in management and organization research. In response to the growing uncertainty and complexity of situations, social sciences have experienced a "pragmatist turn." Many streams of organization research have criticized the view of organizations as information-processing structures, controlled through rational representations. They share some key theoretical principles: the processual view of organizing as "becoming"; the emphasis on the key role of action; the agential power of objects; the exploratory and inquiring nature of organizing. These are precisely the key theses of pragmatists, who formulated a radical critique of the dualisms which hinder organization studies (thought/action, decision/execution, reality/representation, individual/collective, micro/macro) and developed key concepts applicable to organization studies (inquiry, semiotic mediation, habit, abduction, trans-action, valuation). This book aims to make the pragmatist intellectual framework more accessible to organization and management scholars. It presents some fundamental pragmatist concepts, and their potential application to the study of organizations, drawing conclusions concerning managerial practices, in particular the critique of the Taylorian tradition and the promotion of continuous improvement. To enhance accessibility, each theme is illustrated by real cases experienced by the author.
This is an attempt to sketch in very rough form what seem to me some of the central concepts and problems of organization theory. In the first section I have tried to define the field of organization theory and to indicate with some care what justification there is for regarding it as a distinct area of theory, related to, but by no means identical with, the theory of small groups and the theory of social institutions. The comments in the second section on subject-matter areas simply spell out the implications, many of them perhaps obvious, of the central argument of the first section.
This paper is concerned with all kinds of organizations, and not simply with those that fall within the area of public administration. This definition of the scope of organization theory reflects my own conviction that there are a great many things that can be said about organizations in general, without specification of the particular kind of organization under consideration. Moreover, even if we were interested solely in governmental organizations, I believe that a great deal can be learned from the comparison of their characteristics with those of other kinds of organizations, and from attempts to explain the similarities and differences that are found. Neither of these statements denies the existence of numerous and important phenomena that are peculiar to governmental organizations or the need for theory in public administration to deal with these phenomena.
– The influence of Herbert Simon’s administrative behavior on the study of organisations and public choice theory –
In 1978, Herbert A. Simon was awarded the Nobel economics prize mainlyon account of his book Administrative Behavior, which the Nobel Committee said had marked itsera. This article seeks to understand the reasons for this success. Thus Simon’s work is set in thecontext of the historical development of the study of organisations and the decisions they take.When Simon wrote this book, the study of organisations and management was sharply dividedbetween prescriptive models on the one side, and descriptive models on the other side :organisations were created by drawing on traditional descriptive models (scientific managementand organisation theory), although in fact these models’recommendations were not reallyapplied. The original contribution of Administrative Behaviour perhaps lay in the fact that Simonperceived the organisation not as a machine for achieving concrete outputs (goods and services)but primarily as a machine for producing decisions. This provided the conceptual foundations forimportant later developments such as the introduction of information management systems. Evenif decision are of Aristotelian kind, they are sheer bounded rationality due to lack of informationand limited elaboration capacities of the human mind. Organisation help to reduce the complexedecision making process.
Early twentieth-century American pragmatists such as John Dewey placed a strong emphasis on the human faculties of habit and emotion. That contrasts with the emphasis in recent decades on cognitive processes. In contemporary organizational research there has been an increasing interest in recurring action patterns, such as routines and practices. The conceptual difficulties this work has encountered are usefully illuminated by Dewey's view of the primacy of habit and its interplay with emotion and cognition.
A Behavioral Theory of the Firm by Cyert and March (1963) can be interpreted as a culmination of new intellectual directions in the study of organization that began with Herbert Simon's Administrative Behavior (1947). This essay shows how Simon broke with major pre--World War II intellectual traditions and thereby laid the groundwork on which A Behavioral Theory depends. It also suggests the contemporary potential of returning to themes that were set aside by Simon, but were key for prewar pragmatists, such as emphasizing the roles of habit and emotion in organizational action.
Introduction, 99. — I. Some general features of rational choice, 100.— II. The essential simplifications, 103. — III. Existence
and uniqueness of solutions, 111. — IV. Further comments on dynamics, 113. — V. Conclusion, 114. — Appendix, 115.
The present work develops ideas first presented in
Studies in Logical Theory. "All logical forms (with their characteristic properties) arise within the operation of inquiry and are concerned with control of inquiry so that it may yield warranted assertions." "Inquiry is the controlled or directed transformation of an indeterminate situation into one that is so determinate in its constituent distinctions and relations as to convert the elements of the original situation into a unified whole." After an introductory section, the three remaining parts of the treatise deal successively with the structure of inquiry and the construction of judgments, propositions and terms, and the logic of scientific method. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
The fundamental feature that characterizes living systems is autonomy, and any account of their organization as systems that can exist as individual unities must show what autonomy is as a phenomenon proper to them, and how it arises in their operation as such unities. Accordingly the following is proposed. (1) That autonomy in living systems is a feature of self-production (autopoiesis), and that a living system is properly characterized only as a network of processes of production of components that is continuously, and recursively, generated and realized as a concrete entity (unity) in the physical space, by the interactions of the same components that it produces as such a network. (2) That the basic consequence of the autopoietic organization is that everything that takes place in an autopoietic system is subordinated to the realization of its autopiesis, otherwise it disintegrates. (3) That the fundamental feature that characterizes the nervous system is that it is a closed network of interacting neurons in which every state of neuronal activity generates other states of neuronal activity. (4) That the autopoietic states that an organism adopts are determined by its structure (the structure of the nervous system included), and that the structure of the organism (including its nervous system) is at any instant the result of its evolutionary and ontogenic structural coupling with the medium in which it is autopoietic, obtained while the autopoiesis is realized. (5) That language arises as phenomenon proper to living systems from the reciprocal structural coupling of at least two organisms with nervous systems, and that self-consciousness arises as an individual phenomenon from the recursive structural coupling of an organism with language with its own structure through recursive self-description.
Written from the standpoint of the social behaviorist, this treatise contains the heart of Mead's position on social psychology. The analysis of language is of major interest, as it supplied for the first time an adequate treatment of the language mechanism in relation to scientific and philosophical issues. "If philosophical eminence be measured by the extent to which a man's writings anticipate the focal problems of a later day and contain a point of view which suggests persuasive solutions to many of them, then George Herbert Mead has justly earned the high praise bestowed upon him by Dewey and Whitehead as a 'seminal mind of the very first order.'"âSidney Hook, The Nation
Continuing his exploration of the organization of complexity and the science of design, this new edition of Herbert Simon's classic work on artificial intelligence adds a chapter that sorts out the current themes and tools -- chaos, adaptive systems, genetic algorithms -- for analyzing complexity and complex systems. There are updates throughout the book as well. These take into account important advances in cognitive psychology and the science of design while confirming and extending the book's basic thesis: that a physical symbol system has the necessary and sufficient means for intelligent action. The chapter "Economic Reality" has also been revised to reflect a change in emphasis in Simon's thinking about the respective roles of organizations and markets in economic systems.
Dans les limites d’une introduction, j’expose les différentes assomptions (naturalisme, fonctionnalisme) et les principaux axiomes (représentationnalisme, computationnalisme) du paradigme cognitiviste. J’évoque également les critiques d’obédience neuroscientifique de ce programme, avant de présenter les théories qui critiquent son oubli des propriétés conscientes, somatiques, temporelles, environnementales, dynamiques et sociales de la cognition.
The abstract for this document is available on CSA Illumina.To view the Abstract, click the Abstract button above the document title.
carbondale: Southern illinois university press. (première publication 1938) dewey
- J Dewey
dewey, J. (1993). Logic: The Theory of Inquiry. in J. a. boydston (ed.), The Later Works, 1925-1953,
vol. 12. carbondale: Southern illinois university press. (première publication 1938)
dewey, J. (1988). The public and its problems. in The Later Works, 1925-1953, Vol. 2: 1925-1927, ed.
J. a. boydston. carbondale: Southern illinois university press. (première publication 1927)
dewey, J. (1988). Theory of valuation. in J. a. boydston (ed.), John Dewey, The Later Works,
1925-1953, vol. 13: 1938-1939. carbondale: Southern illinois university press, pp. 191-251.
(première publication 1939)
cognition, institutions, near decomposability: rethinking Herbert Simon's contribution, CEEL Working Papers from Cognitive and Experimental Economics Laboratory, department of economics
- M Egidi
- Marengo
egidi, m. & marengo, l. (2002). cognition, institutions, near decomposability: rethinking Herbert
Simon's contribution, CEEL Working Papers from Cognitive and Experimental Economics Laboratory,
department of economics, university of trento, italy, no. 206.
The Phantom Public. piscataway, nJ: transaction publishers. (original work published 1925) lorino
- W Lippmann
lippmann, W. (2011). The Phantom Public. piscataway, nJ: transaction publishers. (original work
published 1925)
lorino, p. (1989). L'économiste et le manageur. paris : la découverte.
lorino, p. (2018). Pragmatism and organization studies. oxford: oxford university press (2019 egoS
book award).
Quand agir c'est penser. certitude, conviction et connaissance directe. Intellectica
- H Maturana
- F Varela
maturana, H. & varela, F. (1984/1994). L'arbre de la connaissance. paris: addisonWesley France.
mead, g. H. (1934). Mind, Self and Society from the Standpoint of a Social Behaviourist, c. morris (ed.).
chicago: university of chicago press.
nonaka, i. & takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-creating Company. oxford: oxford university
press.
ogien, a. (2015). Quand agir c'est penser. certitude, conviction et connaissance directe. Intellectica,
no. 63, 2015/1, pp. 15-35.
L'Inscription corporelle de l'esprit. Sciences cognitives et expérience humaine, traduction française de v
- L Suchman
- F J Varela
Suchman, l. (1987). Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human/Machine Communication.
cambridge : cambridge university press.
varela, F. J. (1989). Invitation aux sciences cognitives. paris: editions du Seuil.
varela, F., thompson, e. & rosch, e. (1993). L'Inscription corporelle de l'esprit. Sciences cognitives et
expérience humaine, traduction française de v. Havelange, paris : Seuil.
vygotski, S. l. (1997). Pensée et langage. paris : la dispute. (première publication 1934).
Retour sur un itinéraire intellectuel. Interview de Herbert Simon
- A Guénette
- V Calvez
guénette, a. & calvez, v. (2000). retour sur un itinéraire intellectuel. interview de Herbert Simon.
Gérer et comprendre, no. 60.
lampedusa, t. di (2007). Le guépard. trad. J. p. manganaro. paris: le Seuil (première publication
en italien 1958)
L’Inscription corporelle de l’esprit. Sciences cognitives et expérience humaine, traduction française de V
- F Varela
- E Thompson
- E Rosch
Université Lumière Lyon 2, école doctorale : sciences de l’éducation, psychologie, informatique et communication, Institut des Sciences de l’Homme
- L Lana De Carvalho
/1994). L’arbre de la connaissance
- H Maturana
- F Varela
Pensée et langage. Paris : La Dispute
- S L Vygotski