ArticlePDF Available

Effect of Cooperative Learning on off Task Behaviour: An Action Research Approach for Better Academic Performance

Authors:

Figures

Content may be subject to copyright.
Eect of Cooperative Learning on o Task Behaviour: An
Action Research Approach for Better Academic Performance
Kalpana Sawane1, Sheela Upendra2, Sheetal Barde1
1Asst. Prof., 2Assoc. Prof., Symbiosis College of Nursing, Symbiosis International University
Abstract
Background: Disruptive o-task behaviour can interfere with the continuity of an average classroom
performance.Learningin groups andteamscan help equipstudents to brainwavetheir critical thinking
skillsthatwillpreparethemtoentertoday’sworkforce.
Objective:ThemainobjectiveofthestudywastoimplementCooperativelearningandtotheseetheeect
onotaskbehaviourofstudentsintheviewtoimprovetheacademicperformanceofstudents.
Material and Method:Onegrouppertestpost-testdesignwasadoptedtoimplementCooperativelearning
on40BaccalaureateNursingstudents.Thesamplewereselectedbypurposivesamplingtechnique.Checklist
was used to assess the o task behaviour and academic performance test were conducted to measure
academic performance.
Results: Daywiseacademicperformancewasassessedanditwasfoundthatthereisreductioninotask
behaviourofstudentsfromdayonetodayseven.Cooperativelearninghaspositiveeectongoodacademic
performanceevidentbyWilcoxonSignranktest.
Keywords: O task behaviour, Cooperative learning, Academic performance
Corresponding Author:
Sheetal Barde
Assistant.Professor,
PlotNo23,srNo88,GujratColony,
Kothrud,Pune-411038
Email: shitalbarde@scon.edu.in
Introduction
Disruptiveo-taskbehaviourcaninterferewiththe
continuity of an average classroom performance. One of
the greatest challenges of the teacher is to maintain order
in the classroom to assist students so they can achieve
academic objectives. Frequency of misbehaviour,
includingo-taskbehaviour,talkingwithoutpermission,
moving without permission, aggression, daydreaming,
inattentiveness,andplayingwithsomethingorsomeone
are all common concerns of educator today1. Rathvon
(1990) denes o-task behaviour as students doing
anything not appropriate to the task at hand. O task
behaviour interfere with academic growth as it creates
distractionintheclassandaectstheconcentration.2
Cooperativelearningmeansmethodwhichlearners
workinasmallgroupmembersorteamswhichcontain
3 to 6 students with heterogeneous capacities work
together until attain goal that both whole group get it.
Groupworkishighlyappreciatedbystudentsasameans
oflearningandpreparingforfuturework
Cooperativelearninginuniversities is based onthe
theoriesofcognitive development, behaviourallearning
and social interdependence. Cooperative learning has
been linked to a range of positive social, eective and
psychological outcomes, including social support, the
quality of students’ relationships, attitude to learning,
learning skills and self-esteem. Cooperative learning
is based on the theories of cognitive development,
behavioural learning and social interdependence.
Cooperativelearninghasbeenlinkedtoarangeofpositive
social, eective and psychological outcomes, including
social support, the quality of students’ relationships,
attitudetolearning,learningskillsandself-esteem.3
Cooperative learning has changed classrooms
frombeing“teacher-centred,”wherethefocusisonthe
DOI Number: 10.5958/0976-5506.2019.01991.0
Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development, August 2019, Vol.10, No. 8 813
teacherimpartingknowledgetothestudents,to“student
centred,”wherethestudentsareexpectedtotakeamore
vigorous part in their own learning.4
Teachershaveseenanincreaseinthelackofsocial
skillsbeingtaughttostudentswhichhasampliedthe
students’lackofcontrol intheirbehaviourandrespect
forothers.Often,studentsfeellittlerespectfromteachers
anddonothavetheskillsthemselvestorespectothersor
to control their behaviour. One of the greatest challenges
of the teacher is to maintain order in the classroom to
assiststudentssotheycanachieveacademicobjective.5
Purpose of the study: Theo-taskbehaviourtypically
begins with one person who does not want to focus on
hisworkandhisbehaviourbecomesdistractive,which
disrupts and gathers wind with some of the other students
in my class.
Asateacherinthecollege,Ihaveobservedalarge
amount of disruptions in my class whenever I discuss or
askquestionsinclass,agreatmajorityhavetodowith
studentsspeakingoutofturn,havingsideconversations.
Only few students used to participate in discussion.
Thosewhoarenotparticipatingtheykeepbusyintheir
own conversations and when asked for response they
usuallyhavenothing tosayorparticipatesupercially.
This results in bad performance at the time of assessment.
Asateacher I wasthinkingto overcome this problem
for the better achievements of students. I want to see
whether the cooperative learning is really impacting
them to be more creative rather than distracting. Also I
want to see whether there is any change in the academic
performance and that change is by chance or it is
associated with cooperative learning. Based on these
factorsinmymindIsetthefollowingobjectivesformy
action research.
Objectives
 1.Toimplementthecooperativelearningtechnique
 2.Toassesstheeectofcooperativelearningono
taskbehaviourofstudents
3. To assess changes in academic performance after
cooperative learning
4.To nd the association between cooperative
learning and academic performance
Material and Method
Design: The research design selected for the study was
one group pertest and post-test design
Setting: Setting of the research study was Symbiosis
CollegeofNursing,SenapatiBapatRoad,Pune,India.
Target population: Target Population for the present
researchisBScNursing2ndyearofSymbiosisCollege
ofNursingwhohavejoinedintheyear2015-16.
Tool: A Checklist was developed to observe o task
behaviour and Academic test in the form of Multiple
choicequestionswerepreparedinordertoassesstheo
taskbehaviourandacademiclearningofthestudents
Procedure for Data Collection: Prior information
was given to the Head of Department of research at
SymbiosiscollegeofNursing
Pretestin theform ofAcademictest was taken on 30
July before the implementation of cooperative learning.
The cooperative learning was implemented. 8
groups were framed. There were 5 students in each
group. I informed about the cooperative learning to
the students. Groups were made keeping in mind the
diversity of the group. The instructions were given and
taskwasexplainedtothestudentseverytimewhenthe
class has been conducted. The cooperative learning was
implementedfrom2Augto8Aug2016.Thetimingof
the class was same for all same days. I tried to maintain
the environment as smooth and conducive as possible to
conduct.Cooperativelearning.Acomfortableclassroom
was selected and the participants were made comfortable
andrelaxed.Timetakenforonesessionwas1hour.
I took additional assistance of Dr. Sheela Upendra,
Assoc. Prof. at Symbiosis College of Nursing to observe
the o task behavior.A separate session was conducted
toexplain her aboutthe details,objectives, purpose of the
researchbeforetheimplementationofCooperativelearning.
ThePosttestintheformofacademictestwastakenon8th
day of the implementation of the cooperative learnin
RESULTS
Section 1: Demographic characteristics calculated by
percentage where maximum students were in the age
group pf 17 to 18. 9 were male and 31 were female
students.
814 Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development, August 2019, Vol.10, No. 8
Section 2:Theeectofcooperativelearningonotask
behaviour of students
Theotaskbehaviourwasmarkedinthechecklist
aseitheryes(ifpresent)orNo(ifnotpresent).
Day wise the score that is number of Yes (= 1) is
decreasing. So graph show decreasing pattern of o
taskbehaviouralltogetherfor8groups.Thisisagood
change in academic performance after implementing
cooperative learning
Section 3: Changes in academic performance after
implementing cooperative learning: Thereissucient
evidence to reject the null hypothesis (p < 0.05). The
populationmedianisstatisticallydierentfrom0.Here
estimated median is 1. So using this, I can conclude
that there is positive eect of cooperative learning on
academic performance of students
Table 1: Comparison of Pertest and Post Test
N = 40
Pre test Post Test
Mean 5.825 Mean 4.8
Median 6Median 5
Mode 6Mode 5
Standard
Deviation 1.034965626 Standard
Deviation 0.992277877
Sample
Variance 1.071153846 Sample
Variance 0.984615385
Section 4: Association between cooperative learning
and o task behaviour: Chi-squaretestforassociation
betweenthequestionsresponseofpre-testandpost-test.
Allthep-valuesarelessthan0.05,Henceshowsthereis
association between cooperative learning and academic
performance.
Discussion
The present work emphasised on the o-task
behaviour in nursing students during the class and
to investigate the relationship between cooperative
learningtoreducetheotaskbehaviour and its eect
onacademicperformanceofstudents.Specically,we
examinedwhetherthispedagogyofgroupworkisreally
eectiveinreducingtheotaskbehaviourornot.Our
ndingsindicatedthatcooperativelearningishavinga
positiveeectinreducingtheotaskbehaviouramong
students as students are utilising same destructive
energyintotheconstructivegroupworkoflearningand
problem solving.
This pedagogy engage the students in the goal
oriented activity. Instructional activities that are more
motivational are in turn increase students’ on-task
behaviour. A state of focused attention is raised when
instruction consists of team work and cooperative
behaviour.
Conict of Interest:Nil
Source of Funding:Nil
Ethical Clearance: Taken from SCON Research
AdvisoryCommittee
References
1.Gaastra GF, Groen Y, Tucha L, Tucha O. The
Eects of Classroom Interventions on O-Task
and Disruptive Classroom Behavior in Children
withSymptomsofAttention-Decit/Hyperactivity
Disorder:AMeta-AnalyticReview;2016.11(2)
 2.Rathvon,N.W.Theeectsofencouragementon
o-task behaviour and academic productivity.
Elementary School Guidance and Counselling;
2010.24(3). 189-199.
 3.Tatang Muttaqin..Cooperative Learning
and Students’ Self-esteem. Education
Reforms in Indonesia;2016. DOI: 10.13140/
RG.2.1.2357.6086
4.Shechtman, Z., & Leichtentritt, J. Aective
teaching: A method to enhance classroom
management. European Journal of Teacher
Education;2004.27(3),323-333
 5.Mueller,A.,&Fleming,T.Cooperativelearning:
Listeningtohowchildrenworkatschool.Journal
ofEducationResearch;2001.94(5),259-265.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
Children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) often exhibit problem behavior in class, which teachers often struggle to manage due to a lack of knowledge and skills to use classroom management strategies. The aim of this meta-analytic review was to determine the effectiveness of several types of classroom interventions (antecedent-based, consequence-based, self-regulation, combined) that can be applied by teachers in order to decrease off-task and disruptive classroom behavior in children with symptoms of ADHD. A second aim was to identify potential moderators (classroom setting, type of measure, students' age, gender, intelligence, and medication use). Finally, it was qualitatively explored whether the identified classroom interventions also directly or indirectly affected behavioral and academic outcomes of classmates. Separate meta-analyses were performed on standardized mean differences (SMDs) for 24 within-subjects design (WSD) and 76 single-subject design (SSD) studies. Results showed that classroom interventions reduce off-task and disruptive classroom behavior in children with symptoms of ADHD (WSDs: MSMD = 0.92; SSDs: MSMD = 3.08), with largest effects for consequence-based (WSDs: MSMD = 1.82) and self-regulation interventions (SSDs: MSMD = 3.61). Larger effects were obtained in general education classrooms than in other classroom settings. No reliable conclusions could be formulated about moderating effects of type of measure and students' age, gender, intelligence, and medication use, mainly because of power problems. Finally, classroom interventions appeared to also benefit classmates' behavioral and academic outcomes.
Working Paper
Full-text available
This paper measures the influence of the cooperative learning method used to improve students’ self-esteem in primary and secondary schools. It is hypothesized that teaching by cooperative learning methods can develop students’ self-esteem.
Article
The purpose of the study was to enhance classroom management in special education classrooms. ‘Affective teaching’ was compared with ‘cognitive teaching’ in 52 classrooms in Israel. Data was collected based on observations of three 90 minute lessons, equally divided into the two types of instruction. Results of MANOVA procedures indicated a lower frequency of misbehaviour, including off‐task behaviour, talking without permission, moving without permission and aggression, in the affective lessons compared with the cognitive lessons. In addition, positive behaviour, including expression of thoughts, expression of feelings, self‐awareness and peer support, was more frequent in the affective lessons compared with cognitive lessons. No age difference was revealed. The discussion focuses on the implications of affective teaching in classroom management.Le but de cette étude était de mettre en valeur la gestion des salles de cours dans les classes d'éducation spécialisée. L'“enseignement affectif” a été comparé ænbsp; l'“enseignement cognitif” dans 52 classes, en Israël. Des données ont été recueillies, basées sur des observations de trois leçons consécutives de 90 minutes chacune, équitablement divisées en deux types d'instructions. Les résultats des procédés MANOVA ont indiqué une fréquence plus faible en mauvaise conduite, également hors‐devoirs, en prise de parole sans autorisation, en mouvements sans autorisation, ainsi qu'en agressivité, lors les leçons affectives par rapport aux leçons cognitives. De plus, un comportement positif, incluant l'expression des pensées, l'expression des sentiments, la conscience de soi, et le soutien entre pairs était plus fréquent lors des leçons affectives comparées aux leçons cognitives. Aucune différence d'age n'a été révélée. La discussion se concentre sur les implications de l'enseignement affectif dans la gestion des classesEl propósito de este estudio fue elevar la gestión en aulas especiales de educación. “Una enseñanza afectiva” fue comparada con “enseñanza cognoscitiva” en 52 aulas en Israel. La data fue recolectada y basada en observaciones de tres lecciones continuas de de 90 minutos, dividida en partes iguales en dos clases de enseñanzas. El resultado del MANOVA procedimiento indicó una descendencia en el mal comportamiento, incluyendo hablar y moverse sin permiso y agresión en la clase afectiva comparada con las lecciones cognoscitivas. Además, una conducta positiva, incluye expresiones de pensamientos expresiones de sentimientos, una propia toma de conciencia y un apoyo de sus camaradas mas frecuente en las clases afectivas comparada con las lecciones cognoscitivas. Ninguna diferencia en las edades fue apreciada. La discusión se centra en las implicaciones de la enseñanza afectiva en las gestiones de las aulasDas Ziel der Studie war die Verbesserung der Unterrichtsführung in Sonderschulklassen. In 52 Klassen in Israel wurden “Affektives Unterrichten” und “Kognitives Unterrichten” miteinander verglichen. Daten, basierend auf Untersuchungen von drei aufeinanderfolgenden, 90‐ minütigen, gleichmäßig in zwei Unterrichtsarten aufgeteilten Unterrichtsstunden wurden erfasst. Im Vergleich zum kognitiven Unterricht zeigten Ergebnisse des MANOVA Verfahrens im affektiven Unterricht eine niedrigere Häufigkeit von Fehlverhalten, einschließlich Nichteilnehmen am Unterrricht, unerlaubtes Sprechen, unerlaubtes und aggressives Bewegen. Außerdem konnte positives Verhalten, einschließlich Gedanken‐ und Gefühlsäußerungen, Ichbewußtsein, Unterstützung von Gleichaltrigen im affektivem Unterricht häufiger beobachtet werden als im kognitiven Unterricht. Es wurden keine Unterschiede zwischen den Altersgruppen erkennbar. Die Diskussion konzentriert sich auf die Auswirkung des affektiven Unterrichts in der Unterrichtsführung.
Article
Cooperative and collaborative learning are recognized as valuable components of classroom learning. However, many questions remain regarding how teachers might structure and guide children's group-learning experiences. An ethnographic case study of 29 Grade 6 and Grade 7 students who worked in groups over 5 weeks was examined to determine what was learned. Data included audiotape recordings of 6 groups of children working together across 11 work sessions, student interviews, children's self-evaluations and drawings, and research reports. Findings revealed that when working in groups, children require periods of unstructured time to organize themselves and to learn how to work together toward a mutual goal.
Article
Evaluated the effects of teacher-delivered proximal and distal encouragement on off-task behavior (OTB) and low academic performance (AP) in 5 1st graders (aged 6 yrs 2 mo to 6 yrs 8 mo) with OTB and AP difficulties. Ss were observed 90 min once a week for 4 wks in their classroom. A consistency of decline in OTB for all Ss suggests that both forms of encouragement were effective, although proximal vs distal encouragement was associated with greater declines in OTB. Both forms of encouragement were not consistently successful in improving AP, as measured by scores on reading-skills sheets and copying papers. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)