ArticlePDF Available

ARE NATIVE TREES AND SHRUBS BETTER CHOICES FOR WILDLIFE IN HOME LANDSCAPES?

Authors:
AR
E
NAT
IVE
TR
EES
AND
S
HRUB
S
B
E
TT
E
R
CH
OI
C
ES
F
O
R
W
I
LDL
I
F
E I
N
H
O
M
E
LAND
S
CA
PES
?
D
r
.
L
i
nd
a
Ch
alker
-
Sc
ott
,
A
ss
o
ci
ate P
r
ofe
ss
o
r
and E
x
ten
si
on
Spe
ci
a
lis
t,
D
epa
r
t
m
ent of
H
o
r
t
ic
u
l
tu
r
e,
W
a
s
h
i
ngton State
U
n
iv
e
rsi
t
y
F
S300E
W SU EXTEN SI ON | A RE N AT I VE TREES A N D SHRU BS B ETTER CHOI CES FOR W I LD LI FE I N H OM E LANDSCAPES?
FS3 0 0E | PAGE 2 | PUBS. W SU . EDU
Overview
M
any gardener
s
prefer
t
o u
s
e na
ti
ve p
l
an
ts
i
n
t
he
i
r
l
and
s
cape
s
.
P
ar
t
of
t
h
is
preference
is
t
he w
i
de
s
pread
be
li
ef
t
ha
t
na
ti
ve
s
pec
i
e
s
are be
tt
er eco
l
og
i
ca
l
cho
i
ce
s
, e
s
pec
i
a
ll
y
i
n prov
i
d
i
ng hab
it
a
t
for na
ti
ve w
il
d
li
fe.
M
o
st
pub
lis
hed re
s
earch de
m
on
st
ra
t
e
s
t
ha
t
t
he na
ti
ve
st
a
t
u
s
of
t
ree
s
and
s
hrub
s
ha
s
littl
e
i
nf
l
uence on
b
i
od
i
ver
sit
y. Th
is
pub
li
ca
ti
on prov
i
de
s
a
m
ore prac
ti
ca
l
,
s
c
i
ence-ba
s
ed approach
t
ha
t
w
ill
enhance bo
t
h
w
il
d
li
fe b
i
od
i
ver
sit
y and
t
he ae
st
he
ti
c appea
l
of ho
m
e
l
and
s
cape
s
.
Introduction
Gardener
s
i
ncrea
si
ng
l
y
s
eek ou
t
na
ti
ve p
l
an
t
s
pec
i
e
s
for
t
he
i
r garden
s
and
l
and
s
cape
s
.
M
any
be
li
eve
t
ha
t
na
ti
ve p
l
an
ts
are be
tt
er cho
i
ce
s
becau
s
e
t
hey are adap
t
ed
t
o
l
oca
l
cond
iti
on
s
.
The U.
S
. Env
i
ron
m
en
t
a
l
P
ro
t
ec
ti
on Agency
(E
P
A), a
m
ong o
t
her federa
l
,
st
a
t
e, and
l
oca
l
agenc
i
e
s
, perpe
t
ua
t
e
s
t
h
is
be
li
ef by
m
ak
i
ng
m
any un
s
c
i
en
ti
f
i
c
st
a
t
e
m
en
ts
abou
t
na
ti
ve p
l
an
t
benef
its
. A
m
ong
t
he
s
e c
l
a
ims
are
t
ha
t
na
ti
ve
p
l
an
ts
are
s
uper
i
or
t
o
i
n
t
roduced
s
pec
i
e
s
i
n
t
he
i
r
ab
ilit
y
t
o w
it
h
st
and
l
oca
l
c
lim
a
t
e cond
iti
on
s
,
t
o
re
sist
pe
sts
and d
is
ea
s
e, and
t
o requ
i
re
l
e
ss
wa
t
er, fer
tili
zer, and o
t
her for
ms
of
m
a
i
n
t
enance
(E
P
A 2017). None of
t
he
s
e c
l
a
ims
have been
s
uppor
t
ed
i
n pub
lis
hed re
s
earch re
l
evan
t
t
o
ho
m
e garden
s
and
l
and
s
cape
s
.
In add
iti
on
t
o
t
he
i
r preference for na
ti
ve p
l
an
ts
,
gardener
s
a
ls
o we
l
co
m
e benef
i
c
i
a
l
, na
ti
ve
w
il
d
li
fe
s
pec
i
e
s
who
s
erve a
s
po
lli
na
t
or
s
and
na
t
ura
l
pe
st
con
t
ro
ls
i
n
t
he
l
and
s
cape. They
be
li
eve
t
ha
t
na
ti
ve p
l
an
ts
prov
i
de
t
he grea
t
e
st
benef
its
t
o na
ti
ve w
il
d
li
fe, a
s
t
he popu
l
a
ti
on
s
coevo
l
ved w
it
h one ano
t
her. Wh
il
e
t
here
is
cer
t
a
i
n
l
y
s
o
m
e ev
i
dence
t
o
s
uppor
t
t
h
is
be
li
ef,
e
s
pec
i
a
ll
y w
it
h
s
pec
i
a
list
i
n
s
ec
ts
who requ
i
re a
par
ti
cu
l
ar food
s
ource,
t
he popu
l
ar be
li
ef
ex
t
end
s
far beyond
t
he docu
m
en
t
ed ev
i
dence.
I
t
st
and
s
t
o rea
s
on
t
ha
t
t
ree
s
and
s
hrub
s
w
it
h
t
he
grea
t
e
st
chance
t
o
s
urv
i
ve and
t
hr
i
ve w
ill
prov
i
de
t
he grea
t
e
st
benef
its
t
o a
ss
oc
i
a
t
ed na
ti
ve
w
il
d
li
fe. Therefore, we need
t
o con
si
der
t
he
rea
liti
e
s
of
t
yp
i
ca
l
ho
m
e
l
and
s
cape
s
and
t
he
i
r
im
pac
ts
on p
l
an
t
s
urv
i
va
l
. How c
l
o
s
e
l
y do urban
and
s
uburban area
s
mi
rror
t
he env
i
ron
m
en
t
a
l
cond
iti
on
s
t
ha
t
na
ti
ve p
l
an
ts
requ
i
re?
F
or
i
n
st
ance, con
si
der
t
he
s
e fac
ts
abou
t
ho
m
e
l
and
s
cape
s:
Fi gure 1. Urban soils ar e frequent ly unprot ect ed, compacted, and
eroded, making sur vival dif ficult for many native woody species.
Fi gure 2. Drought str ess i s commonly seen i n urban t rees and shrubs
that don’t receive suppl emental i rrigation in t he summer.
W SU EXTEN SI O N | A RE N AT I VE TREES A N D SH RUB S BET TER CH OI CES FO R W I LD LI FE I N H OM E LANDSCAPES?
FS3 0 0E | PAGE 3 | PUBS. W SU . EDU
S
o
ils
of
t
en con
sist
of abrup
t
l
ayer
s
of “
t
op
s
o
il
” and o
t
her
m
a
t
er
i
a
ls
, crea
ti
ng poor dra
i
nage and
l
ow oxygen
l
eve
ls
.
There
is
si
gn
i
f
i
can
t
s
o
il
co
m
pac
ti
on a
s
a re
s
u
lt
of foo
t
and veh
i
cu
l
ar
t
raff
i
c and
t
he
l
ack of
pro
t
ec
ti
ve
m
u
l
che
s
(
Fi
gure 1).
Leach
i
ng of
lim
e fro
m
concre
t
e can
i
ncrea
s
e
s
o
il
pH, wh
i
ch
m
ay exceed
t
he pH
t
o
l
erance
s
of
na
ti
ve p
l
an
ts
.
I
m
proper fer
tili
zer app
li
ca
ti
on can re
s
u
lt
i
n nu
t
r
i
en
t
im
ba
l
ance
s
.
Lack of adequa
t
e wa
t
er
i
n
s
u
mm
er
m
on
t
h
s
can har
m
s
pec
i
e
s
adap
t
ed
t
o a fore
st
env
i
ron
m
en
t
(
Fi
gure 2).
Hard
s
cape
s
urface
s
ref
l
ec
t
bo
t
h hea
t
and
li
gh
t
t
ha
t
can affec
t
s
urv
i
va
l
of
t
ree
s
. and
s
hrub
s
adap
t
ed
t
o coo
l
er,
s
had
i
er env
i
ron
m
en
ts
.
I
t
is
c
l
ear
t
ha
t
urban and
s
uburban env
i
ron
m
en
t
a
l
cond
iti
on
s
are un
li
ke
l
y
t
o re
s
e
m
b
l
e wha
t
ever ex
ist
ed
pr
i
or
t
o deve
l
op
m
en
t
. Th
is
m
ean
s
t
ha
t
m
any na
ti
ve woody
s
pec
i
e
s
w
ill
no
t
t
hr
i
ve
i
n an urban or
s
uburban
l
and
s
cape (
Fi
gure 3). W
it
h
t
he
s
e env
i
ron
m
en
t
a
l
rea
liti
e
s
i
n
mi
nd,
l
e
t
s
con
si
der a re
s
earch
que
sti
on
:
doe
s
t
he u
s
e of nonna
ti
ve woody
s
pec
i
e
s
reduce
t
he food and
s
he
lt
er ava
il
ab
l
e
t
o benef
i
c
i
a
l
w
il
d
li
fe?
Figure 3. Arbut usmenziesii, t he Pacific madrone, t hrives in rocky
environments and is ill suited for urban soils.
Scientific Analysis
In 2015, I pub
lis
hed an ana
l
y
sis
of
t
he
s
c
i
en
ti
f
i
c
lit
era
t
ure wh
i
ch prov
i
de
s
t
he con
t
en
t
for
t
h
is
pub
li
ca
ti
on (
C
ha
l
ker-
S
co
tt
2015). (
R
eader
s
can
acce
ss
t
h
is
or
i
g
i
na
l
ar
ti
c
l
e for
m
ore
i
nfor
m
a
ti
on.)
S
pec
i
f
i
ca
ll
y, I wan
t
ed
t
o d
is
cover
whe
t
her woody p
l
an
t
na
ti
vene
ss
wou
l
d
i
nf
l
uence an
im
a
l
b
i
od
i
ver
sit
y. I focu
s
ed on
t
ree
s
and
s
hrub
s
p
l
an
t
ed
i
n urban or
s
uburban
l
and
s
cape
s
. I found over 120 ar
ti
c
l
e
s
fro
m
30
d
i
fferen
t
coun
t
r
i
e
s
t
ha
t
st
ud
i
ed
t
he b
i
od
i
ver
sit
y
of b
i
rd
s
,
i
n
s
ec
ts
,
m
a
mm
a
ls
, and rep
til
e
s
.
M
y
lit
era
t
ure ana
l
y
sis
revea
l
ed
t
ha
t
, w
it
h few
excep
ti
on
s
,
t
he na
ti
ve
st
a
t
u
s
of
t
ree
s
and
s
hrub
s
had no
im
pac
t
on w
il
d
li
fe b
i
od
i
ver
sit
y.
R
e
s
earcher
s
i
den
ti
f
i
ed woody p
l
an
t
st
ruc
t
ure,
func
ti
on, and d
i
ver
sit
y a
s
t
he
m
o
st
im
por
t
an
t
charac
t
er
isti
c
s
for enhanc
i
ng w
il
d
li
fe
b
i
od
i
ver
sit
y. Na
ti
ve woody
s
pec
i
e
s
can be par
t
of
t
h
is
s
cenar
i
o bu
t
m
ay no
t
be a
m
a
j
or
co
m
ponen
t
. The ab
ilit
y of na
ti
ve
t
ree
s
and
s
hrub
s
t
o
li
ve
i
n our ho
m
e
l
and
s
cape
s
is
de
t
er
mi
ned by
t
he env
i
ron
m
en
t
—no
t
by
t
he
i
r
gene
ti
c
s
.
Gardener
s
s
hou
l
d rea
li
ze
t
ha
t
w
il
d
li
fe w
ill
adap
t
t
o new food and hab
it
a
t
s
ource
s
a
s
t
hey beco
m
e
ava
il
ab
l
e.
W SU EXTEN SI O N | A RE N AT I VE TREES A N D SH RUB S BET TER CH OI CES FO R W I LD LI FE I N H OM E LANDSCAPES?
FS3 0 0E | PAGE 4 | PUBS. W SU . EDU
The fac
t
t
ha
t
m
any exo
ti
c,
i
nva
si
ve p
l
an
t
s
pec
i
e
s
are
s
pread by b
i
rd
s
, who
i
nge
st
and re
l
ea
s
e
t
he
s
eed
s
,
de
m
on
st
ra
t
e
s
t
ha
t
re
s
ource adap
t
a
ti
on occur
s
. The
s
a
m
e pheno
m
enon occur
s
w
it
h
m
o
st
w
il
d
li
fe, w
it
h
t
he
excep
ti
on of
t
ho
s
e w
it
h very
s
pec
i
f
i
c re
s
ource requ
i
re
m
en
ts
.
Si t e Conditions and Plant Choices
A
s
you
t
h
i
nk abou
t
your
l
and
s
cap
i
ng cho
i
ce
s
, con
si
der
t
he
s
e re
s
earch-ba
s
ed
s
ugge
sti
on
s
.
Sit
e con
si
dera
ti
on
s
s
hou
l
d a
l
way
s
d
i
c
t
a
t
e
p
l
an
t
s
e
l
ec
ti
on. De
t
er
mi
ne
t
he po
t
en
ti
a
l
env
i
ron
m
en
t
a
l
st
re
ss
e
s
your
t
ree
s
and
s
hrub
s
m
ay exper
i
ence.
Na
ti
ve,
t
e
m
pera
t
e fore
st
t
ree
s
and
s
hrub
s
genera
ll
y do we
ll
i
n
l
arger
l
and
s
cape
s
w
it
h neu
t
ra
l
-
t
o-ac
i
d
i
c, we
ll
-dra
i
ned
s
o
ils
.
In
st
ead of u
si
ng
s
pace-
l
ov
i
ng
l
arger
t
ree
s
i
n
sm
a
ll
er
sit
e
s
, u
s
e
sm
a
ll
er
t
ree
s
or
s
hrub
s
t
ha
t
can be arbor
i
zed (
Fi
gure 4).
If your
l
and
s
cape
s
o
ils
are a
l
ka
li
ne,
poor
l
y dra
i
ned or o
t
herw
is
e d
issimil
ar
t
o
na
ti
ve
s
o
ils
, choo
s
e woody
s
pec
i
e
s
adap
t
ed
t
o
t
ho
s
e cond
iti
on
s
regard
l
e
ss
of
t
he
i
r na
ti
v
it
y.
F
or
sit
e
s
w
it
h h
i
gher
l
eve
ls
of ref
l
ec
t
ed
s
un
li
gh
t
or hea
t
, choo
s
e woody
s
pec
i
e
s
adap
t
ed
t
o ho
t
, dry c
lim
a
t
e
s
.
De
t
er
mi
ne
t
he food and ne
sti
ng hab
it
a
t
needed for your w
il
d
li
fe
s
pec
i
e
s
of
i
n
t
ere
st
.
Fi gur e 4. This ar borized rhododendron pr ovi des a tree-li ke funct ion in a
limited space landscape.
Action Items for Gardeners
Gardener
s
can enhance w
il
d
li
fe d
i
ver
sit
y
i
n
t
he
i
r ho
m
e
l
and
s
cape
s
i
n a nu
m
ber of
s
c
i
ence-
s
uppor
t
ed
way
s:
R
educe open
l
awn and rep
l
ace
it
w
it
h ver
ti
ca
ll
y d
i
ver
s
e vege
t
a
ti
on (
Fi
gure 5). Keep
l
awn
s
where
t
hey
s
erve a purpo
s
e,
s
uch a
s
p
l
ay
s
pace for ch
il
dren or pe
ts
.
R
e
m
ove known
i
nva
si
ve woody
s
pec
i
e
s
and rep
l
ace w
it
h co
m
parab
l
e na
ti
ve or non
i
nva
si
ve
s
pec
i
e
s
.
B
e
s
ure
t
o do
t
h
is
dur
i
ng
t
he appropr
i
a
t
e
s
ea
s
on, when
i
nva
si
ve
s
are no
t
be
i
ng u
s
ed for
ne
sti
ng and forag
i
ng.
Increa
s
e
s
hrub and
t
ree cover, e
s
pec
i
a
ll
y
i
f your
l
and
s
cape
is
d
ist
an
t
fro
m
fore
st
ed area
s
.
W
il
d
li
fe w
ill
s
eek ou
t
pro
t
ec
t
ed ver
ti
ca
l
s
pace
s
for food and
s
he
lt
er.
C
heck
st
a
t
e and na
ti
ona
l
i
nva
si
ve
s
pec
i
e
s
list
before purcha
si
ng p
l
an
ts
. Wh
il
e p
l
an
ts
m
ay no
t
ye
t
appear on your
st
a
t
e’
s
list
,
t
he na
ti
ona
l
list
w
ill
s
how you where
t
hey are curren
tl
y a prob
l
e
m
.
S
e
l
ec
t
sit
e-
t
o
l
eran
t
t
ree
s
and
s
hrub
s
t
o
i
ncrea
s
e p
l
an
t
d
i
ver
sit
y and ae
st
he
ti
c
s
.
Pl
an
t
fru
it
-bear
i
ng
t
ree
s
and
s
hrub
s
, for con
s
u
m
p
ti
on by you and your w
il
d
li
fe (
Fi
gure 6).
B
e
cau
ti
ou
s
w
it
h
s
uch p
l
an
ti
ng
s
i
n area
s
of co
mm
erc
i
a
l
orchard crop produc
ti
on, due
t
o
t
he po
t
en
ti
a
l
for
pe
st
and d
is
ea
s
e
m
anage
m
en
t
iss
ue
s
.
Enhance
l
and
s
cape edge
s
by
l
eav
i
ng
t
he
m
a
l
one! Don’
t
m
ow or app
l
y any pe
sti
c
i
de
s
t
o
t
he
s
e
b
i
o
l
og
i
ca
ll
y r
i
ch env
i
ron
m
en
ts
.
W SU EXTEN SI O N | A RE N AT I VE TREES A N D SH RUB S BET TER CH OI CES FO R W I LD LI FE I N H OM E LANDSCAPES?
FS3 0 0E | PA GE 5 | PU BS.W SU. EDU
R
e
t
a
i
n dead
t
ree
s
(“
s
nag
s
”),
st
u
m
p
s
,
l
og
s
, and p
il
e
s
of branche
s
whenever po
ssi
b
l
e. They prov
i
de
cr
iti
ca
l
hab
it
a
t
for cer
t
a
i
n benef
i
c
i
a
l
b
i
rd
s
and
i
n
s
ec
ts
(
Fi
gure 7). If
s
nag
s
or o
t
her woody debr
is
po
s
e a
hazard
t
o peop
l
e or proper
t
y,
t
hey
s
hou
l
d be re
m
oved.
P
ro
t
ec
t
s
o
ils
w
it
h coar
s
e, woody
m
u
l
ch, e
s
pec
i
a
ll
y where co
m
pac
ti
on occur
s
. The co
m
b
i
na
ti
on of
woody
m
u
l
che
s
and pro
t
ec
t
ed
s
o
ils
im
prove
s
hab
it
a
t
for
i
n
s
ec
ts
, rep
til
e
s
and
sm
a
ll
m
a
mm
a
ls
(
Fi
gure
8).
E
limi
na
t
e
t
he unnece
ss
ary u
s
e of pe
sti
c
i
de
s
. U
tili
ze good In
t
egra
t
ed
P
e
st
M
anage
m
en
t
(I
PM
) prac
ti
ce
s
where pe
sti
c
i
de
s
are a
l
a
st
re
s
or
t
.
Add a per
m
anen
t
wa
t
er fea
t
ure, when fea
si
b
l
e,
t
ak
i
ng
i
n
t
o accoun
t
po
t
en
ti
a
l
m
anage
m
en
t
iss
ue
s
(
s
uch a
s
m
o
s
qu
it
o breed
i
ng). Don’
t
force your garden w
il
d
li
fe
t
o hun
t
e
ls
ewhere for
t
h
is
cr
iti
ca
l
nece
ssit
y (
Fi
gure 9).
Fi gur e 5. Verti cal st ructur e in a smal l urban landscape. Not e al so t he
diverse groundcovers that have replaced the or iginal lawn.
Fi gure 7. A wooded “hell str ip” wi th woody debris incorporated int o the
desi gn.
Figure 6. Rubushayata- koidzumii—a low -growing woody groundcover
with edible fruit.
Fi gur e 8. A diversi ty of nat ive and nonnat ive woody plants, prot ected
wit h coar se woody mulch.
W SU EXTEN SI O N | A RE N AT I VE TREES A N D SH RUB S BET TER CH OI CES FO R W I LD LI FE I N H OM E LANDSCAPES?
FS3 0 0E | PA GE 6 | PU BS.W SU. EDU
Figure 9. A permanent wat er feature can at tr act ben eficial wil dlife and
be aest hetically appealing.
Fi
na
ll
y, b
i
od
i
ver
s
e
l
and
s
cape
s
are
im
por
t
an
t
for you,
t
he gardener! They have been
li
nked
t
o
s
e
lf-reported
well-being
of gardener
s
and
t
he
i
r ne
i
ghbor
s
(Luck e
t
a
l
. 2011).
Additional Resources
C
ha
l
ker-
S
co
tt
, L. 2015. U
si
ng arbor
ist
wood ch
i
p
s
a
s
a
l
and
s
cape
m
u
l
ch. W
S
U Ex
t
en
si
on
F
ac
t
S
hee
t
FS
160E.
J
a
m
e
s
, D.G. 2014.
B
enef
i
c
i
a
l
i
n
s
ec
ts
,
s
p
i
der
s
and
mit
e
s
i
n your garden
:
who
t
hey are and how
t
o ge
t
t
he
m
t
o
st
ay. W
S
U Ex
t
en
si
on
M
anua
l
E
M
067E.
R
e
i
chard,
S
.H., and
C
.W. Ha
milt
on. 1997.
P
red
i
c
ti
ng
i
nva
si
on
s
of woody p
l
an
ts
i
n
t
roduced
i
n
t
o Nor
t
h
A
m
er
i
ca.
C
on
s
erva
ti
on
Bi
o
l
ogy 11
:
193–203.
U
S
DA
P
LANT
S
da
t
aba
s
e. 2017. In
t
roduced,
i
nva
si
ve, and nox
i
ou
s
p
l
an
ts
. Acce
ss
ed 10
/
11
/
2017.
Wa
s
h
i
ng
t
on
St
a
t
e Nox
i
ou
s
Weed
C
on
t
ro
l
B
oard. 2017. Acce
ss
ed 10
/
11
/
2017.
Re f e r en ce s
C
ha
l
ker-
S
co
tt
, L. 2015. Nonna
ti
ve, non
i
nva
si
ve woody
s
pec
i
e
s
can enhance urban
l
and
s
cape
b
i
od
i
ver
sit
y. Arbor
i
cu
lt
ure and Urban
F
ore
st
ry 41(4)
:
173-186.
Env
i
ron
m
en
t
a
l
P
ro
t
ec
ti
on Agency (E
P
A). 2017. Land
s
cap
i
ng
ti
p
s
. Acce
ss
ed 10
/
11
/
2017.
Luck, G.W.,
P
. Dav
i
d
s
on, D.
B
oxa
ll
, and L.
Sm
a
ll
bone. 2011.
R
e
l
a
ti
on
s
be
t
ween urban b
i
rd and p
l
an
t
co
mm
un
iti
e
s
and hu
m
an we
ll
-be
i
ng and connec
ti
on
t
o na
t
ure.
C
on
s
erva
ti
on
Bi
o
l
ogy 25
:
816–826.
C
opyr
i
gh
t
© Wa
s
h
i
ng
t
on
St
a
t
e Un
i
ver
sit
y
W
S
U Ex
t
en
si
on pub
li
ca
ti
on
s
con
t
a
i
n
m
a
t
er
i
a
l
wr
itt
en and produced for pub
li
c d
ist
r
i
bu
ti
on. A
lt
erna
t
e
for
m
a
ts
of our educa
ti
ona
l
m
a
t
er
i
a
ls
are ava
il
ab
l
e upon reque
st
for per
s
on
s
w
it
h d
is
ab
iliti
e
s
.
Pl
ea
s
e
con
t
ac
t
Wa
s
h
i
ng
t
on
St
a
t
e Un
i
ver
sit
y Ex
t
en
si
on for
m
ore
i
nfor
m
a
ti
on.
I
ss
ued by Wa
s
h
i
ng
t
on
St
a
t
e Un
i
ver
sit
y Ex
t
en
si
on and
t
he U
S
Depar
tm
en
t
of Agr
i
cu
lt
ure
i
n fur
t
herance
of
t
he Ac
ts
of
M
ay 8 and
J
une 30, 1914. Ex
t
en
si
on progra
ms
and po
li
c
i
e
s
are con
sist
en
t
w
it
h federa
l
and
st
a
t
e
l
aw
s
and regu
l
a
ti
on
s
on nond
is
cr
imi
na
ti
on regard
i
ng race,
s
ex, re
li
g
i
on, age, co
l
or, creed, and
na
ti
ona
l
or e
t
hn
i
c or
i
g
i
n
;
phy
si
ca
l
,
m
en
t
a
l
, or
s
en
s
ory d
is
ab
ilit
y
;
m
ar
it
a
l
st
a
t
u
s
or
s
exua
l
or
i
en
t
a
ti
on
;
and
st
a
t
u
s
a
s
a V
i
e
t
na
m
-era or d
is
ab
l
ed ve
t
eran. Ev
i
dence of nonco
m
p
li
ance
m
ay be repor
t
ed
t
hrough your
l
oca
l
W
S
U Ex
t
en
si
on off
i
ce. Trade na
m
e
s
have been u
s
ed
t
o
sim
p
li
fy
i
nfor
m
a
ti
on
;
no endor
s
e
m
en
t
is
i
n
t
ended.
P
ub
lis
hed Apr
il
2018.
... Rather than limiting planting palettes to native species (which may be poorly adapted to urban conditions), noninvasive exotic species adapted to these harsher conditions should be considered. A robust body of research supports the use of introduced trees and shrubs in residential and public landscapes in addition to appropriate native species (Chalker-Scott, 2018;2015b). Not only do they tolerate urban conditions, they provide habitat for wildlife just as effectively as native trees and shrubs. ...
Article
Full-text available
Horticultural myths, found extensively in print and online resources, are passed along by uninformed gardeners, nursery staff, and landscape professionals. Occasionally myths are so compelling that they make their way into Extension publications, used by Master Gardeners as educational resources. In this article we deconstruct seven widespread gardening myths by way of reviewing research-based literature. We also provide scientifically sound alternatives to these gardening practices and products. Our hope is to arm Extension educators with the educational resources necessary to battle misinformation that ranges from the merely useless to that which is actively damaging to soils, plants, and the surrounding environment.
Article
Despite global concerns regarding climate change, one thing remains constant: homeowners want gardens and landscapes that serve them functionally and aesthetically. The strong affinity homeowners have for their land can lead to excessive use of water and fertilizer. This literature review explores the relationships between homeowners and their residential landscapes and the efforts that can be made to address misuse and overuse of resources. Governmental organizations should work together with community groups, nursery and landscape associations, and university Extension faculty to understand homeowner desires and behaviors before instituting policies regarding resource use that are unpopular, resented, and ignored. Networking between the nursery industry and university Extension faculty and Master Gardener volunteers can provide educational opportunities for homeowners to understand and implement more sustainable landscape practices as well as showcasing ornamental landscape plants that can help meet both personal aesthetics and resource conservation goals.
Article
Full-text available
Increasingly, homeowner associations and municipalities are requiring a certain percentage of native trees and shrubs as part of any new landscape installation. These native species mandates make numerous claims as to the superiority of native plants over introduced species, including their ability to enhance ecosystem biodiversity. In contrast, nonnative trees and shrubs are labeled as harmful to biodiversity, primarily because they are improperly grouped with known invasive species. This review summarizes the current published science regarding the effects of native and nonnative woody species on urban landscape stability as measured by biodiversity of associated plants, birds, insects, reptiles, and mammals. The preponderance of studies demonstrate that parameters other than species nativity have the greatest influence on biodiversity of these groups. Rather than limiting tree and shrub selection lists to a narrow palette of native species, a more practical, science-based approach to enhancing urban landscape biodiversity is suggested.
Article
Full-text available
By 2050, 70% of the world's population will live in urban areas. In many cases urbanization reduces the richness and abundance of native species. Living in highly modified environments with fewer opportunities to interact directly with a diversity of native species may adversely affect residents' personal well-being and emotional connection to nature. We assessed the personal well-being, neighborhood well-being (a measure of a person's satisfaction with their neighborhood), and level of connection to nature of over 1000 residents in 36 residential neighborhoods in southeastern Australia. We modeled these response variables as a function of natural features of each neighborhood (e.g., species richness and abundance of birds, density of plants, and amount of vegetation cover) and demographic characteristics of surveyed residents. Vegetation cover had the strongest positive relations with personal well-being, whereas residents' level of connection to nature was weakly related to variation in species richness and abundance of birds and density of plants. Demographic characteristics such as age and level of activity explained the greatest proportion of variance in well-being and connection to nature. Nevertheless, when controlling for variation in demographic characteristics (examples were provided above), neighborhood well-being was positively related to a range of natural features, including species richness and abundance of birds, and vegetation cover. Demographic characteristics and how well-being was quantified strongly influenced our results, and we suggest demography and metrics of well-being must be considered when attempting to determine relations between the urban environment and human well-being.