Chapter

Foreign Policy Decision-Making

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the author.

Abstract

The study of foreign policy decision-making seeks to understand how states formulate and enact foreign policy. It views foreign policy as a series of decisions made by particular actors using specific decision-making processes. The origins of this focus on decision-making are generally traced to the 1950s and 1960s, with the literature increasing in complexity and diversity of approaches in more recent decades. Foreign policy decision-making is situated within foreign policy analysis (a subfield of international relations subfield), which applies theories and methods from an array of disciplines—political science, public administration, economics, psychology, sociology—to understand how states make foreign policy, and how these policies translate into geopolitical outcomes. The literature on foreign policy decision-making is often subdivided based on assumptions about the process by which actors make foreign policy decisions—primarily falling into rational and nonrational decision-making; about who is assumed to make the decision—states, individuals, groups, or organizations; and about the influences believed to be most important in affecting those decisions—international factors, domestic political factors, interpersonal dynamics, etc. While much of the literature focuses on foreign policy decision-making in the United States, there have been attempts to apply models developed in the US context to other states, as well as to generate generalizable theories about foreign policy decision-making that apply to certain types of states.

No full-text available

Request Full-text Paper PDF

To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the author.

... Site of Decision Making a policy plays a crucial role in the implementation of a policy, and this section mentions the location of decision-making based on the policy to be implemented. A decision is a choice formed on the basis of two or more alternatives (Blankshain, 2019). Decision-making on a policy plays a crucial role in the application of a policy, placing decision-making on the applications of the Digital Literacy Program in the Society in the City of Palembang. ...
Article
Full-text available
This digital literacy is motivated by the COVID-19 Pandemic, people must adapt to new cultures such as work, school, and economic activities through online media. Advances in digital-based information technology cannot be stopped anymore and have become part of today's society's need., For this reason, it is necessary to increase public knowledge in the field of digital literacy. This study aims to determine the implementation of digital literacy programs in the community in Palembang City, among and students. This study uses a qualitative method, using the four pillars of digital literacy, digital skills, digital culture, digital ethics, and digital safety. The theory used in this study is the implementation theory of Grindle, in which determined by the content of the policy and the context of its implementation. The basic idea of this theory is that after the policy is transformed, its implementation takes place. Data analysis in this study used interactive model analysis of qualitative data from Miles and Saldana consisting of Data Condensation, Data Display, and Conclusion drawing or verifications. Based on this research, the four pillars of digital literacy are very important indicators in digital literacy programs. Digital skills are the most basic pillars of interest for the public to learn as basic knowledge of digital literacy. Then followed by digital ethics as further knowledge that needs to be studied so that people know ethics when using digital media. Based on this research, it can be concluded that the implementation of digital literacy will be successful if it is also supported by regulations, rules, and policies for equal distribution of internet networks in all regions of Indonesia, including in the city of Palembang. The government and relevant stakeholders should continuously improve the facilities and infrastructure related to digital literacy, such as expanding stable internet networks and boosting the economy through the development of various online businesses. The shared programs between the government and other communities in educating the masses need to be implied regulary, so that the people, especially in Palembang have an increase of digital literacy as a whole.
... This explains why the new ministry, unlike the Federal Ministry of National Planning, which traditionally handles 'Nigeria's multilateral international relations in the West Africa sub-region', is primarily in charge of continental integration and co-operation issues. 38 It was against this background that Obasanjo went to the OAU summit in Algiers in July 1999, seeking not only to set 'in motion the process of re-launching the CSSDCA', but also to persuade his colleagues to make the OAU the primary institution for resolving conflicts in Africa. 39 ...
... Agenda setting in foreign policy involves making the problem public and inviting public discourse on the matter (Blankshain, 2019). Once the issue has received the limelight, the discourses can help see the best cases on how to solve the problem by floating different alternatives. ...
Article
Full-text available
This literature review offers a comprehensive synthesis of existing research on China’s foreign policy, identifying the driving factors, strategic objectives, and implications for the global order. The analysis begins with how China’s foreign policy is formulated and is divided into core, middle-range, and long-range and then delves into theoretical frameworks, including realism, constructivism, and liberalism. Also, this paper will highlight in this literature review how a leader’s choice, national compromise, and the system pressure deeply influence the foreign policy of China. The strategic objectives of China’s politics, military, and diplomatic initiatives, along with the role of leadership in maintaining world peace, diplomatic influence, and foreign aid, are also examined. The review concludes with an assessment of the implications of China’s rise for regional stability, international order, and power dynamics among major players. By critically evaluating the literature, this review provides valuable insights for policymakers, academics, and practitioners seeking to understand China’s growing influence on the global stage.
... Under Putin, the media and societal actors like NGO's or other civil groups are marginalized in foreign policy-making (Trenin and Lo 2005). In fact, these actors construct the Russian public opinion, but their institutional influence on policy formulation is quasi non-existent. ...
... After Putin's accession to the presidency and his almost immediate consolidation of the Russian state at the beginning of his first presidential term in 2000-2004, many observers bestowed the President with a substantial autonomy concerning the shaping of Russia's foreign policy (Charap, 2007). According to Trenin & Lo (2005), Putin is extremely autocratic with regard to foreign policy and is advised by the usual circle of political insiders; that is, by the advisors in the presidential administration, including the National Security Council, and to a lesser extent by the Foreign Ministry. The advice is given on the basis of information provided by the domestic intelligence service (FSB), the foreign intelligence service (SVR) and the military intelligence service (GRU). ...
Article
Full-text available
Russia's strategy in the Arctic is dominated by two overriding international relations (IR) discourses – or foreign policy directions. On the one hand, there is an IR-realism/geopolitical discourse that puts security first and often has a clear patriotic character, dealing with ‘exploring’, ‘winning’ or ‘conquering’ the Arctic and putting power, including military power, behind Russia's national interests in the area. Opposed to this is an IR-liberalism, international law-inspired and modernisation-focused discourse, which puts cooperation first and emphasises ‘respect for international law’, ‘negotiation’ and ‘cooperation’, and labels the Arctic as a ‘territory of dialogue’, arguing that the Arctic states all benefit the most if they cooperate peacefully. After a short but very visible media stunt in 2007 and subsequent public debate by proponents of the IR-realism/geopolitical side, the IR-liberalism discourse has been dominating Russian policy in the Arctic since around 2008–2009, following a pragmatic decision by the Kremlin to let the Foreign Ministry and Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov take the lead in the Arctic. The question asked here is how solid is this IR-liberalist-dominated Arctic policy? Can it withstand the pressure from more patriotic minded parts of the Russian establishment?
... Thus, it has been claimed that Nigeria "identified more with Western interests, while relations with Eastern Europe were slow and cautious", 9 that the Balewa administration "preferred to deal almost exclusively with the West and to keep the Soviets and their allies at a safe distance", 10 and that Balewa's "more favorable view of the West than the East … resulted in Balewa's Nigeria having diplomatic relationships with Eastern bloc countries that were clearly not as robust as Nigeria's relationships with Western bloc countries". 11 For these analyses, to be non-aligned is to be equidistant, and since Nigeria's relations with East and West were perceived to exhibit a tilt in favour of the West, Nigeria was 'aligned'. This explains the rather hasty conclusion that there is "hardly any doubt that Sir Abubakar's government (1960)(1961)(1962)(1963)(1964)(1965)(1966) did not practice the policy of nonalignment it publicly declared". ...
Article
Full-text available
Two traditions of analysis exist with regard to the nature and expression of non-alignment in Nigeria’s foreign policy between 1960 and 1965. The tradition that dates from the early 1960s concludes that Nigeria’s foreign policy towards the Cold War was independent and non-aligned, and the post-war tradition is that Nigeria was ‘aligned’. Both traditions adduce as evidence for their opposing verdicts Nigeria’s voting pattern in the United Nations General Assembly between 1960 and 1965. Yet no thoroughgoing quantitative analysis of Nigeria’s pattern of voting in the General Assembly,both in individual and relative terms, has been undertaken. But can the same piece of evidence at the same time support such opposing conclusions? This paper responds to this problematic by first reviewing Nigeria’s policy toward the United Nations, and analysing the pattern of Nigeria’s voting on Cold War issues in the General Assembly. It employed the Lijphart method of computing Indices of Agreement of roll-call votes, taking account of abstentions, and arranged these indices in matrices anchored on groups of possibly caucusing states. The result is that the coincidence of Nigeria’s pattern of voting was minimal with those of the superpowers, but highly related to the voting patterns of the ‘radical’ African states and putative non-aligned states. This strengthens the conclusion that Nigeria acted as the administration said it would: independent and not routinely identifying with either of the superpowers.
... B.Lo and D. Trenin (2005) The Landscape of Russian Foreign Policy Decision-Making, Carnegie Moscow Center, last accessed: 4 October 2005, address: http://www.carnegie.ru/en/pubs/books/9200doklad_fin.pdf. ...
Article
This report looks at Russian policy and perceptions of the relations with the EU in the field of external security. Whereand by whom are decisions on these relations taken in Russia? Which are the Russian security policy interests in relations to the EU? How does Russia view the European Security and Defence Policy and the EU engagement in the European neighbourhood? The report also analyses how Russia views the prospects for cooperation within the Common Space for External Security.
... This explains why the new ministry, unlike the Federal Ministry of National Planning, which traditionally handles 'Nigeria's multilateral international relations in the West Africa sub-region', is primarily in charge of continental integration and co-operation issues. 38 It was against this background that Obasanjo went to the OAU summit in Algiers in July 1999, seeking not only to set 'in motion the process of re-launching the CSSDCA', but also to persuade his colleagues to make the OAU the primary institution for resolving conflicts in Africa. 39 ...
Article
Full-text available
The rapid creation of the African Union (AU) has been described as one of the most puzzling events in interstate co-operation in contemporary Africa. While studies published so far on the subject express surprise at the AU's speedy creation, none makes any attempt to explain the clash of interests and ideas of the key actors and how they were accommodated in order to create the AU. This article attempts to fill this gap by exploring the interests and ideas that drove the AU process. It argues that the introduction at the Algiers summit in 1999 of two separate reform packages that were meant to reform the OAU in line with the foreign policy interests of Nigeria and South Africa set in motion the process that eventually led to the creation of the AU.
Thesis
Les théories présentées, Astley et Fombrun 1983 ; Moore, 1993 ; Iansiti et Levien, 2004 ; Peltoniemi et Vuori (2004) nous permettent de décrire clairement le nouveau contexte de la prise de décision stratégique au sein duquel évolue l'écosystème d'affaires.Cette analyse a de profonds effets sur le type de collaboration. Les études récentes ne traitent généralement pas de la manière dont les différents types de stratégies sont influencés par les divers contextes de changement de la politique étrangère. Dans cette perspective, l'environnement politique est considéré comme une question compliquée pour les entreprises multinationales. Par conséquent, ne pas les examiner peut avoir des dommages irréparables et les études récentes négligent cette importance. Notre recherche comble, en partie, ces lacunes en étudiant les types de stratégie collective et inclut une réflexion sur la politique étrangère.Selon l'analyse de la base de données de PSA, cette recherche a illustré la stratégie d'alliance avec des partenaires sous forme de « joint-venture » afin de réduire le risque imprévisible. Par ailleurs, nous avons découvert le rôle de deux types de stratégie collective (alliance-coopétition) pouvant aider à la compréhension et à la performance des écosystèmes.Les analyses effectuées lors de notre travail, nous permettent de souligner que la compréhension du changement de l'environnement de la politique joue un est rôle important sur le choix de la stratégie collective.
Chapter
The focus of this chapter will be the management of multi-ethnic coexistence in the post-Soviet transition. It will examine the peculiarities of the transition in each of the Baltic countries in terms of inter-ethnic relations and government policy. The chapter will examine the complex of problems relating to ethnicity, nationalism, ethnic conflict and its resolution, institutions, and the political participation of ethnic minorities in the Baltic states. Particular emphasis will be placed on assessing the importance and socio-political effects of the changing ethnic structure in each of these states as well as their relations with Russia in this regard.
Article
This essay explores Russia's Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) policy, by focusing on two questions. First of all, analysts have noted Russia's disinterest and obstructive policies towards the Organization. Thus, the question is what – if anything – does the Russian Federation still want from the OSCE? Secondly, does the OSCE still serve as a forum for dialog? These two issues are studied on the basis of rational institutionalism and realism. The essay demonstrates that Russia is still interested in the OSCE, but its policy has become more pragmatic, selective and instrumentalist. It includes obstructive and constructive strategies. At the same time, today the Russian Federation ascribes less significance to the Organization in European security. This is predetermined not only by its inability to push its interests through the OSCE, but also by the declining interest of other participating States in the Organization. The differences between OSCE participants have turned it into a battlefield of interests in many areas.
Article
While the desire to counterbalance US unilateralism informed Russian perceptions and advocacy of multipolarity globally, the complex and fluid balance of power in a multipolar East Asia complicates Russian perceptions and policies of multipolarity regionally and counterbalancing US power became not the sole goal. Russia's aim in East Asia was to reassert its influence while ensuring a stable regional environment in order for Russia to restore itself as a great power. However, the relatively stabilizing US regional role, the rise of neighboring China, the prospects of Japanese remilitarization and strengthened US-Japanese military alliance, and the lack of a Northeast Asian security structure are factors that pose both challenges and opportunities for Russian policymakers in pursuing Russian interests and great-power aims. Such factors have served to make Russian perceptions and policy in East Asia somewhat contradictory. While Russia's great-power aspiration was relatively clear, the policies to achieve this remained vague and inconclusive. © The author [2008]. Published by Oxford University Press in association with the Japan Association of International Relations; all rights reserved.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.