Content uploaded by Md. Rasheduzzaman
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Md. Rasheduzzaman on Sep 23, 2020
Content may be subject to copyright.
www.ijird.com June, 2019 Vol 8 Issue 6
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT DOI No. : 10.24940/ijird/2019/v8/i6/JUN19058 Page 292
Landslide Disaster in Malaysia: An Overview
1. Introduction
Nowadays, a disaster is a common phenomenon and a great concern all over the world. Large numbers of
causalities, property damages, livelihood deterioration, destructions of habitat and many other destructive events take
place when different kinds of natural and manmade disasters occur. In Malaysia various types of disaster are frequently
striking every year. According to the report (Prevention Web 2014) Malaysia had faced flood (62.5%), storm (12.5%), wild
fire (8.5%), landslides (8.3%), drought (4.2%), earthquake (2.1%) and mass movement (2.1%) during 15-years period
(1990-2014). The report shows that not only flood and storm, but also landslide has great devastating effects on advanced
contemporary societies around the world. This natural disaster causes huge casualties and massive financial losses,
especially, in hilly areas. The United States annually faces economic losses of more than USD 2 billion and about 25 to 50
deaths (Li & Wang 1992) due to landslide. The economic loss in China caused by landslides is estimated to be more than
USD 500 million. Landslides are common in hilly and mountainous areas in Malaysia too. During the period between 1963
and 2014, Malaysia had faced many major and medium landslide disasters which caused up to 500 fatalities in total as well
ISSN 2278
–
0211 (Online)
Ayesha Akter
Assistant Professor, Department of Emergency Management,
Patuakhali Science and Technology University, Bangladesh
Megat Johari Megat Mohd Noor
Professor, Department of Environmental Engineering and Green Technology,
University Technology Malaysia, Malaysia
Masa Goto
Professor, Department of Environmental Engineering and Green Technology,
University Technology Malaysia, Malaysia
Shamsunnahar Khanam
Associate Professor, Department of Environmental Science,
Bangladesh University of Professionals, Bangladesh
Ahmed Parvez
Associate Professor, Department of Environmental Science,
Patuakhali Science and Technology University, Bangladesh
Md. Rasheduzzaman
Lecturer, Department of Emergency Management,
Patuakhali Science and Technology University, Bangladesh
Abstract:
In recent times growing population and accelerative economic condition have led to the construction of high-rise
condominiums and expansion of settlements and lifelines over the hilly areas in Malaysia. Due to these development activities
risk of landslide disaster events with potential of causalities and economic damage greater than before is increasing. Under
such circumstances, number of research efforts conducted in Malaysia has been quickly increasing in recent year, which
indicates that landslide is now being considered not only as natural events or a result of design fault, but as a greater risk for
the society that needs to be managed in a scientific and systematic way rather than in a haphazard way. The focus of this
review is to define knowledge gaps between the current research outcomes and the future research necessities, which are
highly recommended to be focused on in order to establish a sustainable society with rapid development and urbanization in
Malaysia. From the review it can be concluded that a lot of works have been done so far on model development, mapping and
risk zonation but a limited number of researches has been carried out on the causal factor’s analysis, sensitivity analysis and
socioeconomic characterization. Even few studies have been conceded on response and behavioral aspects of the societies and
the crisis management in the events of landslide. It should also be pointed out that, most of the research has been focusing on
the, peninsular Malaysia, but not on Sabah and Sarawak in Borneo Malaysia. The reviewers propose to establish an
integrated data base on landslides occurred in both Peninsular and Borneo Malaysia. A sound collaborative linkage-based
research guideline among the researchers’ the policy makers and the residents must be established for better understanding
of the facts and figures of Malaysian landslide disaster and its risk.
Keywords: Landslide, classifications, factors, disaster phases, knowledge gaps
www.ijird.com June, 2019 Vol 8 Issue 6
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT DOI No. : 10.24940/ijird/2019/v8/i6/JUN19058 Page 293
as substantial loss of properties, collapsed of multistoried buildings, damage on roads and high-ways, and loss of
environmental resources. The statistics show that 2.8 landslides per year occur on the average, and of which 1.7 cases
result in fatalities and property losses. More than 13.9% of mortalities were caused by landslides during the years of 1990-
2014 (Prevention Web 2014).
The damages and losses by landslide in Malaysia are partially due to the rapid urbanization and economic
development of the country. People have been expanding their economic activities in to the highlands and hilly terrain
areas due to the scarcity of suitable low-lying areas available. Cutting of mountain sides and hilly areas for construction of
high-rise buildings increases the risk of landslide (Jamaludin & Ahmad 2006). In addition, hill slope areas are under the
pressure of human activities such as deforestation and excavation of slopes for road construction, and land-clearing for
agriculture and building construction which are key factors for landslides (Dai et al. 2002). Furthermore, prolonged and
intense rainfall, slope instability, topography and soil characteristics also have considerable effects on landslide
occurrence (Qasim et al. 2013a; Jamaludin 2006). In absence of appropriate data base, lack in appropriate hill slope
technology, cooperation among the organization for establishment of strategies, planning and awareness to reduce
landslide risk, the inhabitants of the terrains are still under a high risk. To understand the landslide trend and associated
risk factors, the causal analysis based on the historical data set, in the context of Malaysian conditions, is in urgent need.
For this reason, this study aims:
To identify the knowledge gaps for research that need to be addressed immediately by classifying study topics
based on the investigation on landslide disaster analysis.
To summarize the available secondary data to analyze the frequency, trend and risk factors of landslides in
Malaysia for the future research works.
2. Landslide
Landslide may be defined as the movement of a mass of rock, debris, or earth down a slope. Cruden (1991) defines
that a landslide is a rapid displacement of rock, residual soil or sediments adjoining a slope and the center of gravity of
moving mass advances in a downward and out-ward directions. Hutchinson defines landslide as a relatively rapid
movement of soil and rock on down slope, which takes place characteristically on, discrete bounding slip of surface that’s
is the moving mass (Hutchinson 1995). Slope movement can occur in five modes; namely fall, topple, slide, spread and
flow. These modes are dependent on the type of geologic materials (bed rock, residual soil, earth and their mixture)
(Cruden & Varnes 1996).
3. Malaysian Experience of Landslides
This literature (Table 1) provides several perspective and interpretations that tend to relate physical, ecological,
social, infrastructure and economic connection.
No.
Location
Date
Toll
Loss of Properties
Cost (M)
Scale
1
Highland Tower
Dec. 11, 1993
48
Collapsed of one block of
12-story high apartment
RM 184
Major
2
Keramat Permai
May 3, 1995
-
-
RM
1.3
Medium
3
Keramat Permai
Aug. 20, 1995
_
_
<RM 1
Medium
4
Ampang Jaya
Aug. 20, 1995
_
_
RM 1.3
Medium
5
Ampang Jaya
June 10, 1996
-
-
RM 1.3
Medium
6
Bukit Antarabangsa
May 14, 1999
-
-
-
-
7
Bukit Antarabangsa
May 15, 1999
-
Access road to the
residential area
RM 5.4
Major
8
Jln Bukit Antarabangsa
Oct. 5, 2000
-
Damage of road
-
Medium
9
Taman Zooview
Oct. 29, 2001
-
-
-
-
10
Taman Zooview
Nov. 8, 2001
-
-
RM 1.3
Major
11
Taman Hillview
Nov. 20, 2002
8
Damage of 1 unit of
bungalow
RM 17.4
Major
12
Oakleaf Park Condo,
BukitAntarabangsa
Nov. 2, 2003
-
-
-
Medium
13
Jalan Bukit Mulia Bukit
Antarabangsa
Nov. 7, 2003
-
-
-
Medium
14
Jln Tebrau, Dataran Ukay
Feb. 1,2005
-
-
-
Medium
15
Kampung Pasir
May 31, 2006
4
Damage of 3 blocks of
longhouses
RM 21
Major
16
Condo Wangsa Height,
Bukit Antarabangsa
April 24, 2008
-
Damage of 4 vehicles
-
Medium
17
Tmn Bukit Mewah, Bukit
Antarabangsa
Dec. 6, 2008
5
Damage of 14 units of
bungalows
RM 7.6
Major
18
Wangsa Height, Bukit
Antarabangsa
Sep.
19, 2009
-
-
-
Medium
19
Ukay Club Villa
April 2010
-
-
RM 1.3
Medium
www.ijird.com June, 2019 Vol 8 Issue 6
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT DOI No. : 10.24940/ijird/2019/v8/i6/JUN19058 Page 294
No.
Location
Date
Toll
Loss of Properties
Cost (M)
Scale
20
Bukit Antarabangsa
Aug. 2010
-
-
RM 1.3
Medium
21
Ukay Perdana
Feb. 2011
-
-
RM 1.3
Medium
22
Selangor
21 May 2011
15
-
-
Medium
23
The Puncak Setiawangsa
29 Dec 2012
-
Shop houses and double
-
story terrace houses were
ordered to move
-
Medium
24
Putra Heights
04 Jan 2013
-
Several
vehicles to be
submerged
-
No
update
25
Camerun high land
2013
7
Damage of infrastructure
RM 3.5
Major
26
Bukit lajan kualampur
9 May 2014
-
Blocked the road
-
-
Table 1: Recent (From 1993 To 2014) Scenarios of Landslide in Malaysia
The trend of landslide disaster occurrence is gradually increasing (figure 1). The reason of raising number of
landslides is now a matter of research but commonly they are due to slope failure. These seem that mostly slope failure are
triggered by a localized rainfall. But associated inherent weaknesses of the rock or soil combined with human activity like
heavy condominium construction and poor drainage system may have the contributing role. Because hilly and terrain
region are highly vulnerable and sensitive to human alterations (water streams diversions, cut off vegetative coverage)
compare to the plain land. Mostly collapsing condominiums which responsible for both life loss and economic damages.
Figure 1: Trend of Landslide Disaster in Malaysia Showing an
Upward Movement
Figure 2: Month Wise Landslide Occurrence in Malaysia
www.ijird.com June, 2019 Vol 8 Issue 6
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT DOI No. : 10.24940/ijird/2019/v8/i6/JUN19058 Page 295
Figure 3: Month Wise Landslides Hazard Calendar in Malaysia
A multi-criteria analysis (Figure 3) shows that in the month of February and August all the factors are positively
correlates each other’s. And the month of May and November (Figure 2) have the higher number of landslide experience.
Considering the climatic parameters (Rain fall and temperature) November is the rainy season in Malaysia that may be the
reason of slope failure whereas moth of May are under the dry spell but the highest number of landslide occurred in May,
which indicates presence of other factors that may be a new research scope for landslide disaster impact reduction.
Figure 4: Increasing Trend of Articles Published in the
Different Journal Regarding Malaysian Landslides
Due to massive destruction history of landslides in Malaysian society the university scholars and technical
professionals has already take it in their account to do more research in advanced management aspects. That is why last
few years the scientific articles are assimilation to the web of knowledge base. It is found that (Figure. 4) the rate of
increasing number of published articles is gradually upward. Besides the increasing number of articles on landslide
disaster in Malaysia, the number of diversified journals also increased because of its dynamic scoping characters. Some
geoscience-based journals are mostly covering the research focusing their different angle of scopes.
Sl
.
Name
o
f
t
he
Journal
No
. Pub.
1
Arabian journal of geosciences
6
2
Environmental earth sciences
4
3
Landslides and engineered slopes: from the past to the future, vols 1 and 2
4
4
Natural hazards
3
5
Sains Malaysiana
3
6
Landslides
3
7
Geomatics natural hazards & risk
2
8
IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing
2
9
International journal of remote sensing
2
10
Expert systems with applications
2
11
Remote sensing for environmental monitoring, gis applications, and geology
ix
2
12
Geomorphology
2
13
Landslides and climate change: challenges and solutions
2
Table 2: Articles Collected from the Journals Used in the Study
www.ijird.com June, 2019 Vol 8 Issue 6
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT DOI No. : 10.24940/ijird/2019/v8/i6/JUN19058 Page 296
According to the (Sassa et al. 2009) stated in the appropriate topics of landslide about 21 as he proposed in his
articles. Combining this topic in light with phases of disaster management (Salem et al. 2011) this study proposed a
classification of published paper into eight following categories.
Figure 5: Classification of Papers on Landslides Disaster in
Malaysia from Web of Science Records
Classification of papers on landslides disaster
Fundamental research
Research on Causal factors identification
Landslide triggering factors investigation
Effects of landslide disaster analysis
Landslide mitigation, management and resilient development research
Landslide disaster preparedness research
Response to occurrence of landslide
Post landslide recovery and rehabilitation study
3. 1. Class 1 (Fundamental Research)
This category of research includes landslide dynamics, mechanism and process. Geology, geomorphology,
geotechnical geo physics of landslide also included under this segment. There are 18% papers have been matched with
this category so far information found from the data base. (Jebur et al. 2015) proposed a user-friendly BSM (Bivariate
Statistical Modeler) for numerous applications, such as, natural hazard, mineral, hydrological and other engineering and
environmental applications. From (Manap et al. 2014) investigated the application of the probabilistic based frequency
ratio (FR) model for mapping ground water potential at Langat basin, Malaysia. He used the frequency ratio coefficients of
the hydrological factor to produce map. On the other hand (Simon et al. 2015) assessed the influence of development on
land slide occurrence using 3 years’ time series, based on two indicators; land use and road density and showed a positive
relationship with each of the factors. (Jebur et al. 2015) who conducted research at Gunung pass, detected a vertical slope
movement, which was highly vegetated tropical area. He used L-band InSAR techniques for detecting vertical
displacement.
Some of the extensive soil-based research also conducted to describe the Malaysian landslides. (Pradhan et al.
2012) who is one of the pioneer researchers observed soil erosion by universal soil loss equation (USLE) method at
Penang Island. He found a correlation between soil erosion and landslide events, which are directly proportional to each
other. The similar kind of study was also done by (Khosrokhani & Pradhan 2013). She observed and assessed soil erosion
with its dynamic characteristics at Kuala Lumpur metropolitan city using universal soil loss equation.
3.1.1. Knowledge Gaps
A lot of work is still need to done for the understanding of Malaysian landslides mechanism. There is some lack of
knowledge in the area of fundamental research regarding debris transportation process; the mechanism of mass change is
an important topic in the study of debris flow, avalanches and sliding of land. Basal erosion is considered as a dynamic
interaction among the moving material and the entrained basal top-soil shearing along with non-slip contact surface can
be an area for new observation. On the other hand, peninsular Malaysia is full of mountainous ridges, how erosion
occurred in that area can be described significantly by emergence of fractal structures in geomorphological phenomena
(Czirók et al. 1997). Besides this thermo-mechanical model can be applied to understand large scale, deep seated
landslides consisting of a coherent mass sliding. In this model the considerable parameter is temperature rising in the slip
zone due to heat produce by the friction. Furthermore, a sliding block model is very much fit in to describe the
mountainous high-speed landslides. It can predict by simulating the soil mass from the onset of the event including travel
speed of mass material and hazard areas. This technique will be more useful for the prediction of landslide events in Sabah
and Sarawak. Finally, more research is necessary to determine sensitivity factors other than both temperature and
precipitation, magnitude, frequency of landslide changes in relation to recent climate and future climate change situations
particularly in tropical forest areas in Malaysia.
www.ijird.com June, 2019 Vol 8 Issue 6
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT DOI No. : 10.24940/ijird/2019/v8/i6/JUN19058 Page 297
3.2. Class 2 (Causal Factors Identification)
Under this category of research landslide occurring factors, which have at least potentiality to contribute such
happening. There are 4% articles have been related with this category. We can subdivide these causal factors into two:
natural and manmade factors. On the other hand we can divided it in to three sub-categories: Intrinsic factors (which allow
other factors to act more efficiently) includes steep slope, deep weather soil, high clay content and high annual rainfall,
introductory factors (which make the slope vulnerable to slide) includes human activities, deforestation, land use change,
construction of high raise building, high way, poor drainage system, excavations etc., Initiating factors (which finally
initiate the movement) includes earth quake and heavy rainfall.
(Alkhasawneh et al. 2014) specified the importance of 21 factors causing the landslides in his study carried out a
wide area of Penang Island which may represents the peninsular Malaysia. Among all the factors he showed slope angle,
distance from drainage, surface area, slope aspects and cross curvature is the most important factors. (Parasad et al. 2012)
used woody vegetation to observed the growth for providing low cost and environmentally suitable alternative to the
conventional methods of slope stabilization using the finite element software PLAXIS. The result showed that the factors of
safety of the slopes increased significantly by the reinforcement effects of woody vegetation. (Douglas et al 1999)
investigated 10 years at Danum Vally, Sabah and provided a strong evidence of the role of extreme events on the erosion
process in tropical forest areas.
3.2.1. Knowledge Gaps
Regardless of these causal factors some other factors may include sliding belt, disturbed rocks, ancient colluvium,
slope wash, topographic scarp, and elevated ground water table and drainage network for example, dendritic etc.
Moreover, a landslide data base or digital landslide inventories is highly demanded for the better assessment of landslide
and future master plan to reduce the potential risk, in Malaysia. It will be more useful if geo-environmental factors,
triggering factors and elements at risk are added to the information data base. A complete data base gives insights into
landslide location, types, dates, frequency of occurrence, and state of activity, severity, size, failure mechanism, and causal
factors. In line with additional information and complementary data of core attributes like geographical coordinates,
landslide site name along with region and country, last reactivation, state of activity, volume of surface extent may be
included with data base. To make the inventory a creative, information of landslide geometry (surface dimension and
depth of failure surface), geology (structure and material properties), hydrogeology, land coverage, triggering factors,
impact, causalities and damages, remedial measures, surveying methods, surveyor’s name and bibliographical references
will be more appropriate.
From the figure 6 it is clear that contributing factors of world landslides geological and ground conditions are
covering the 43% which indicates the natural control. But for Malaysian cases (figure 7) we found that about 58% are
design errors. The results are also similar with (Gue & Tan 2006); he found that 60% are inadequacy in design. This is
results of lack of understanding and appreciation of the subsoil conditions and geotechnical issues. It also includes the
decision errors comprising with misinterpretation and miscalculation. It indicates that if we minimize these design errors,
we can reduce the risk so a new research may be conducted here to resolve this matter.
3.3. Class 3 (Landslide Triggering Factors Investigation)
According to (Griffiths 1999) Causes of landslides are two groups:
Preparatory factors
Triggering factors
Heavy rainfall or snow melt, earthquake shaking, volcanic eruption and erosion are the triggering factors that
created an instantaneous change in the stress-strain associations in the slope resulting in movement. Geological
conditions, groundwater conditions, geo-morphological conditions, climatic factors, seismic activity, weathering, and man-
made factors are the main factors which are called preparatory factor. This category of research includes direct
contributing factors which can cause the disaster. There are 7% papers have been complemented with this category.
Figure 6: Contributing Factors of Landslides
www.ijird.com June, 2019 Vol 8 Issue 6
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT DOI No. : 10.24940/ijird/2019/v8/i6/JUN19058 Page 298
Figure 7: Contributing Factors of Landslides Based on
Malaysia Case History
National Slope Master Plan Malaysia
Most of the landslides that caused most damaged in Malaysia occurred in man-made slopes. Examples of such
landslides include the Highland Towers in 1993, Bukit Lanjan rockslide in 2003, Taman Zooview in 2006, Bukit
Antarbangsa in 2008. (Komoo et al 2011) interpreted that in Malaysia most of the landslides occur because of slope failure
that is manmade slope of highway and resident. (Qasim et al. 2013b) mention that condition of sub soil, geology, ground
water and underground piping should be considered for investigation the causal factor. (Saadatkhah 2014) demonstrated
that prolonged rainfall has played a vital role for slope failure using spatiotemporal regional modeling coupled with
rainfall induced slope failure. (Matori et al. 2012) reported the effect of monsoonal selected geospatial data in landslide
modeling in Cameron Highlands. They used geographical information system coupled with land surface temperature LST
by developing a model Based map of landslide. (Hassaballa et al. 2014) extract the soil moisture over the areas of Bukit
Antarabangsa using microwave remote sensing to examine the impact of soil moisture content on landslide occurrence.
They stated that 6th December 2008 recorded heavy rain fall resulted in a raise of ground water table causing the
landslide. Frequent and prolong rainfall is a triggering factor of landslide in Malaysia. As a tropical country, Malaysia
enjoys 2400 mm rainfall annually (Li & Wang1992) added that rainfall intensity and slope failure have a good co-relation.
He also mentions that the ground water level also playing important role in triggering the landslide, which is always
overlooks as one of the initial factors of landslide.
Table 3: Rainfall Intensity and Slope Failure Correlation (Li & Wang1992)
(Mukhlisin et al. 2015) analyzed 15 event of rainfall prompted landslides in Ulu Klang, and found that all of the
event were triggered by landslide but some events casual factors were different that was inadequate slope design,
improper design, construction method, poor maintenance of the internal drainage system, off slope and retaining
structural soil type and slope gradient. In Malaysia most slope failure occurred by manmade slope development in hilly
terrain areas, such as highland tower at kualampur in 1993, bukit lanjan rockside in 2003, taman zooview in 2006, and
again bukit lanjan at 2014. In 1993 the landslide event of Ulu Klang reported by (MPJA 1994) mentioned some of the
reasons such as soil movement, surface runoff due to improper drainage facility cut of hill slope. Not only the human factor
but also some natural factor associated with landslide such granite terrain which weathered deeply in geological timescale
that’s why tropical Malaysia experience many landslides. (Chigira et al. 2011) isolated some region of peninsula Malaysia.
Earthquake is the major triggering factor next to the intensive rainfall. The shaking produced by earthquake cause an
increase in the load down the slope and can also decreases the shear strength and both effects can cause the release of
debris flow. One of the landslides evented in Sabah is reported earthquake as the triggering factors. Weathering and
surface fracturing also considered as a vital triggering factors for sliding in some parts of the world (Dragićević 2010).
3.3.1. Knowledge Gaps
A regional basis investigation for understanding the above triggering potentialities and mapping of vulnerable
zone can be a new research arena. In addition to this, application of digital tools, geographical information system, digital
Rainfall
Intensity
Slope
Condition
25mm/day
Show signs of surface erosion
50mm/day
Surface erosion intensify
100mm/day
Stability deteriorate, marginally, stable slope may deform and move
150mm/day
Marginally stable slope may deform or collapse
200mm/day
Marginally stable
slope may deform or collapse. Stable slope may also show signs of instability
250mm/day
Stable and vegetated slope may also deform or collapse.
www.ijird.com June, 2019 Vol 8 Issue 6
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT DOI No. : 10.24940/ijird/2019/v8/i6/JUN19058 Page 299
image processing, digital photogrammetry, global positioning through using various models for analyzing the contribution
of triggering factors on landslide occurrence can enhance the better research outcomes in Malaysia.
3.4. Class 4 (Impacts Of Landslide Disaster Analysis)
Date
Location
Death
Cost MRM
May 61
Ringlet Cameron highland, Pahang
16
3.48
Oct 73
KAMPUNG kacag puith ipoh
42
64.78
Dec 95
Highland ampang selangr, tower,
48
184.9
Jun 95
Km 39 lebuhraya kl karak
20
48.3
Dec 96
Keningau, Sabah 302
45
8.9
Jan 96
Km 303 North
-
South Expressway Gunung
Tempurung, Perak
11
6.7
Aug 96
Pos Dipang, perak
44
69
Feb 99
Gelam Sandakan, Saba
302
458.9
Jan2
Simunjan, Sarawak
16
28
Nov 3
KM 21.8 NKVE Bukit Lanjan, Selangor
8
36
Apr 05
Kpg Melayu Bt 11, punching, Selangor
47
May 06
Taman bukit zooview, hulu klang, Selangor
4
20.7
Apr 06
KM 33 Jln Simpang pulai Cameron highland
35
4.6
Table 4: Major Land Slide in Malaysia and Estimated Loss of Cost
This category of research includes the impacts of landslide on socioeconomic system, ecosystems management
and short term or long-term urbanization process. There are 1% papers have been matched with this category so far
information found from the data base. Malaysia has a high concentration of development of express ways, high ways, high
raises condominium, tunnels, and monorail etc. in hilly terrain and peninsular region close proximity to build-environment
and natural environment. Because of the high annual rainfall along with some others induced factors these man-made
environment and natural hillside would pose a risk to public as reported by death tool of 600 and adequate property
damages (Table 4) since 1960 to till date (Azmi et al. 2013).
3.4.1. Knowledge Gaps
The following area of research is proposing by the present study cost-benefit analysis and livelihood analysis.
Under the classification of effects of landslide disaster economic analysis, damage, loss and need assessment, effects on
human society, environmental impact assessment and social impact assessment, risk analysis of building damages induced
by landslide disaster impacts may be the major focusing areas. In spite of frequent deadly landslide in Malaysia, literature
is not available on socio-economic and environmental effects. Very few works have been published in this area except
some of the technical report commissioned by government.
3.5. Class 5 (Landslide Mitigation, Management and Resilient Development Research)
This category of research includes landslide study, which includes the physical, social and institutional
vulnerability of the people as well as scientific clarification and indigenous solution of mitigation measures. There are 12%
papers have been matched with this category so far information found from the data base. (Halim & Normaniza 2015)
showed that plant density was inversely related to the soil saturation level (STL) and erosion rate on the slope. The
redistribution of infiltrated rainwater in the soil mass could be the reason for the slow response of failure mechanism to
rain fall. (Mariappan et al. 2010) has proposed some comprehensive program to reduce the loss of landslide through
creation of early warning and monitoring system better policy and effective implementation, outlining design procedure,
creation of local hazard mapping, land use management, building, grading control etc.
3.5.1. Knowledge Gaps
Social vulnerability index may apply to the landslide hazard prone areas. Variables representing the social
vulnerability of the different states of Malaysia are needed to be selected after application of correlation tests.
Furthermore, a novel risk assessment method measuring the resiliency of landslide disaster of hill slope community need
to be structured for implementation of risk vulnerability analysis, performance of disaster mitigation approaches and
reduction of future life loss and property damages.
3.6. Class 6 (Landslide Disaster Preparedness Research)
This category of research includes all sorts of consideration prior to the landslide need for predicting, forecasting,
hazard mapping, Risk assessment, Emergency preparedness, Real time monitoring, research development and training etc.
There are 50% papers have been matched with this category so far information found from the data base. (Saadatkhan et
al. 2014b) applied transient rainfall infiltration and grid-based regional slope stability analysis method (TRIGRS) for
unsaturated initial conditions is used to complete transient response of pore pressure during rainfall periods and
consequent changes in the safety factors. (Pradhan & Youssef 2010) presented landslide hazard analysis at Cameron area
using geographic information system and remote sensing data and found that frequency ratio model is better in prediction
of landslide than bivariate logistic regression model. (Razak et al. 2013) evaluates the suitability of ALS (Airborne Laser
www.ijird.com June, 2019 Vol 8 Issue 6
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT DOI No. : 10.24940/ijird/2019/v8/i6/JUN19058 Page 300
Scanning) for generating an optimal DTM (Digital Terrain Model) for mapping land use in the Cameron High land,
Malaysia’s and found that ALS derived DTMs allowed mapping and classifying landslide beneath equatorial mountainous
forests leading to a better understanding of hazardous geomorphological problem in Malaysia as well as tropical region.
(Pradhan et al. 2014) estimate the land subsidence (sinkhole) hazard at the Kinta Valley of Perak, using GIS and RS
techniques and finally prepared probability map. From the above literature it is clear that mapping-based susceptibility
and model analysis has been covered most of the hot spot of landslide occurred areas.
3.6.1. Knowledge Gaps
But a lot of information gaps are still need to be under research. Most of the developed countries use satellite
remote sensing as a tool in disaster management and sustainable development research. Prediction of the spatiotemporal
distribution of landslides using real time satellite rainfall system may be a new scope of research. In relation to this “2006
Tokyo Action Plan” which enhances the risk conscious reconstructions can be the applicable research in city Centre. OR
models applicable for integrated community-based program, Humanitarian logistics in Malaysia, Emergency Medical
Rescue team etc. Considering the disaster readiness aspects this research may extend up to natural hazard and risk
communication strategy among the multi ethnic community and community trauma recovery program after the landslide
occurrence can give a whole shape.
3.7. Class 7 (Response to occurrence of landslide)
This category of research includes warning, evacuation, search and rescue, trauma management, volunteerism
dynamic modification of technology, amendment on the current rules and regulations by the previous landslide
experience, reverse changes in moving to risk prone areas, multistory to single story etc. There are 3% papers have been
harmonized with this category. (Abedin et al. 2005) initiated a study to classify and predict potential erosion induced
landslide locations of occurrence used ROM scale to determine the soil susceptibility for failure in terms of its soil
erodibility index value and rain fall data of both Frasher Hill and Genting Highlands. This result showed that rainfall risk
frequency is at the highest risk in the month of November and September.
3.7.1. Knowledge Gaps
That is why, geo-hydrological risk management and preparedness of Malaysian Civil Protection Authority for
warning and evacuation in response to landslide may be an effective research program. Furthermore, post occurrence of
landslide, reconstruction management using public perception and lesson learned can be added with the research
portfolio.
3.8. Class 8 (Post Landslide Recovery and Rehabilitation Study)
This category of research includes slope management, slope stabilization, Life pole stabilization, debris
management, traffic management, temporary shelter management, insurance management and relief management etc.
There are 5% papers have been accorded with this category. (Ali et al. 2010) studied on the use of vegetation for slope
protection. This was a bioengineering approach to documented root mechanical properties. He studied two para meter
pull-out and tensile strength to select the best root performance of the trees. Finally, he suggested plant using for slope
stabilization work. (Gui et al. 2008) investigated a compilation of site reconnaissance, topography survey, subsurface
investigation, laboratory testing and back analysis to examine the relationship between the landslides and the rainfall. He
confirmed that landslide was indeed related to the long period rainfall.
3.8.1. Knowledge Gaps
Future research under this class like vegetation recovery and landscape change assessment may helpful.
Automated system enables emergency planners to estimate the expected displacement of families for optimizing post-
disaster temporary housing allocations may value the good research scheme also.
4. Conclusion
This study synthesizes the previous landslide history and critically reviews the landslides previous history, causal
factors and research domain. Further, a brief summary of landslide disaster management research scope in Malaysia.
Moreover, limited causes of landslide have been investigated and reported in developing area that had damaged the
property or poses a greater risk to life. Besides this aspect some other issues may appear as a hindrance of the progressive
work, need to be addressed. For sustainable solution of the land slide disaster may broadly cover the socioeconomic and
Ecology centered key areas which are identified throughout the study in different classes are applicable for future
research.
5. Acknowledgement
This work is partially supported by FRGS Research Grant, with Vote No. R.K130000.780. 4F655 under Ministry of
Higher Education (MoHE) and MJIIT Student Incentive Programme.
www.ijird.com June, 2019 Vol 8 Issue 6
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT DOI No. : 10.24940/ijird/2019/v8/i6/JUN19058 Page 301
6. References
i. Abdullahi, S., Pradhan, B., Mansor, S., & Shariff, A. R. M. 2015. GIS-based modeling for the spatial measurement and
evaluation of mixed land use development for a compact city. GIScience & Remote Sensing, 52(1), 18-39.6
ii. Azmi, A. S. M., Salleh, W. A. R. W. M., & Nawawi, A. H. 2013. Cognitive Behaviour of Residents Toward Living in
Landslide Prone Area: Ulu Klang.Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 101, 379-393., ISSN 1877-0428,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.07.212.
iii. Ali, F. 2010. Use of vegetation for slope protection: Root mechanical properties of some tropical plants. International
Journal of Physical Sciences,5(5), 496-506.
iv. Alkhasawneh, M. S., Ngah, U. K., Tay, L. T., & Isa, N. A. M. 2014. Determination of importance for comprehensive
topographic factors on landslide hazard mapping using artificial neural network. Environmental earth
sciences, 72(3), 787-799.
v. Chigira, M. A. S. A. H. I. R. O., Mohamad, Z. A. I. N. A. B., Sian, L. C., & Komoo, I. 2011. Landslides in weathered granitic
rocks in Japan and Malaysia. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Malaysia, 57, 1-6.
vi. Cruden, D. M., and D. Varnes. 1996. Landslide types and processes."Landslides, Investigation and Mitigation, ed. AK
Turner and RL Schuster. Transportation Research Board, Special Report 247 (85): 36475.
vii. Cruden, D.M., 1991. A simple definition of a landslide. Bulletin of the International Association of Engineering
Geology 43, 27 – 29.
viii. Czirók, A., E. Somfai, and T. Vicsek. "Fractal scaling and power-law landslide distribution in a micromodel of
geomorphological evolution." Geologische Rundschau 86, no. 3 1997: 525-530.
ix. Dai, F. C., Lee, C. F., & Ngai, Y. Y. 2002. Landslide risk assessment and management: an overview. Engineering
geology, 64(1), 65-87.
x. Douglas, I., Bidin, K., Balamurugan, G., Chappell, N. A., Walsh, R. P. D., Greer, T., & Sinun, W. 1999. The role of extreme
events in the impacts of selective tropical forestry on erosion during harvesting and recovery phases at Danum
Valley, Sabah. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 354(1391), 1749-1761.
xi. Dragićević, S. 2010. Modeling the dynamics of complex spatial systems using GIS, cellular automata and fuzzy sets
applied to invasive plant species propagation. Geography Compass, 4(6), 599-615.
xii. Gonghui Wang, Kyoji Sassa 2009: Seismic loading impacts on excess pore water pressure maintain landslide
triggered flowslides. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 34(2):232-241.
xiii. Griffiths, J. S. "Proving the occurrence and cause of a landslide in a legal context." Bulletin of Engineering Geology
and the Environment 58, no. 1 1999: 75-85.
xiv. Gue, S.S. and Y.C. Tan, 2006. Landslides: Cases Histories, Lessen Learned and Mitigation Measures. Paper presented
at the Sinkhole, Structure Failure: Myth or Science? IpoH, Malaysia.
xv. Gui, M. W., & Han, K. K. 2008. A case study on rainfall infiltration effect on the stability of two slopes. Civil Eng. Dept.,
National Taipei Univ. of Technology, Taipei, China.
xvi. Halim, A., & Normaniza, O. 2015. The effects of plant density of Melastoma malabathricum on the erosion rate of
slope soil at different slope orientations. International Journal of Sediment Research, 30(2), 131-141.
xvii. Hassaballa, A. A., Althuwaynee, O. F., & Pradhan, B. 2014. Extraction of soil moisture from RADARSAT-1 and its role
in the formation of the 6 December 2008 landslide at Bukit Antarabangsa, Kuala Lumpur. Arabian Journal of
Geosciences, 7(7), 2831-2840.
xviii. http://www.preventionweb.net/files/10712_MALAYSIAOfficialStatementFinal.pdf
xix. http://www.starproperty.my/index.php/articles/property-news/predicting-future-landslides-in-malaysia/
xx. Hutchinson, J. N. "Keynote paper: landslide hazard assessment." Landslides. Balkema, Rotterdam 1995: 1805-1841.
xxi. Jamaludin, S., & Ali, F. 2011. An overview of some empirical correlations between rainfall and shallow landslides and
their applications in Malaysia.Electron J Geotech Eng, 16, 1429-1440.
xxii. Jamaludin, Suhaimi, and Ahmad Nadzri Hussein. "Landslide hazard and risk assessment: The Malaysian
experience." Notes (1993).
xxiii. Jamaludin, Suhaimi, Bujang BK Huat, and Husaini Omar. "Evaluation and Development of Cut–Slope Assessment
Systems For Peninsular Malaysia In Predicting Landslides In Granitic Formation." Jurnal Teknologi 44, no. 1 (2012):
31-46.
xxiv. Jebur, M. N., Pradhan, B., & Tehrany, M. S. (2015). Manifestation of LiDAR-derived parameters in the spatial
prediction of landslides using novel ensemble evidential belief functions and support vector machine models in
GIS. Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, IEEE Journal of,8(2), 674-690.6
xxv. Jebur, M. N., Pradhan, B., Shafri, H. Z. M., Yusoff, Z. M., & Tehrany, M. S. (2015). An integrated user-friendly ArcMAP
tool for bivariate statistical modelling in geoscience pplications. Geoscientific Model Development, 8(3), 881-891.
xxvi. Khosrokhani, M., & Pradhan, B. (2014). Spatio-temporal assessment of soil erosion at Kuala Lumpur metropolitan
city using remote sensing data and GIS.Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 5(3), 252-270.
xxvii. Komoo, Ibrahim, Sarah Aziz, and Lim Choun Sian. "Incorporating the Hyogo Framework for Action into landslide
disaster risk reduction in Malaysia."Bulletin of the Geological Society of Malaysia 57 (2011): 7-11.
xxviii. Li, T., Wang, S., 1992. Landslide Hazards and their Mitigation in China. Science Press, Beijing, 84 pp.
xxix. Manap, M. A., Nampak, H., Pradhan, B., Lee, S., Sulaiman, W. N. A., & Ramli, M. F. 2014. Application of probabilistic-
based frequency ratio model in groundwater potential mapping using remote sensing data and GIS. Arabian Journal
of Geosciences, 7(2), 711-724.
xxx. Mariappan, S., Ali, F., bin Mohamad, A., Abdullah, C. H., Hassan, N. R. N., Chong, S., & Huat, L. T. 2010. Undertaking loss
reduction measures to prevent slope failures. Scientific Research and Essays, 5(2), 119-129.
www.ijird.com June, 2019 Vol 8 Issue 6
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT DOI No. : 10.24940/ijird/2019/v8/i6/JUN19058 Page 302
xxxi. Matori, A. N., Basith, A., & Harahap, I. S. H. 2012. Study of regional monsoonal effects on landslide hazard zonation in
Cameron Highlands, Malaysia. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 5(5), 1069-1084.
xxxii. MPJA, 1994. Report of the Technical Committee of investigation on the collapse of Block 1 and the Stability of Block
2 and 3 Highland Towers Condominium Hulu Klang Selangor Darul Ehsan.
xxxiii. Mukhlisin, M., Matlan, S. J., Ahlan, M. J., & Taha, M. R. 2015. Analysis of Rainfall Effect to Slope Stability in Ulu Klang,
Malaysia. Jurnal Teknologi,72(3).
xxxiv. Pradhan, B., & Youssef, A. M. 2010. Manifestation of remote sensing data and GIS on landslide hazard analysis using
spatial-based statistical models.Arabian journal of geosciences, 3(3), 319-326.6Pradhan, B., Abokharima, M. H.,
Jebur, M. N., & Tehrany, M. S. 2014. Land subsidence susceptibility mapping at Kinta Valley (Malaysia) using the
evidential belief function model in GIS. Natural hazards, 73(2), 1019-1042.6
xxxv. Pradhan, B., Chaudhari, A., Adinarayana, J., & Buchroithner, M. F. 2012. Soil erosion assessment and its correlation
with landslide events using remote sensing data and GIS: a case study at Penang Island, Malaysia.Environmental
monitoring and assessment, 184(2), 715-727.
xxxvi. Pradhan, B., Latif, Z. A., & Aman, S. N. A. 2012. Application of airborne LiDAR-derived parameters and probabilistic-
based frequency ratio model in landslide susceptibility mapping. In Applied Mechanics and Materials(Vol. 225, pp.
442-447).
xxxvii. Prasad, A., Kazemian, S., Kalantari, B., Huat, B. B., & Mafian, S. 2012. Stability of tropical residual soil slope reinforced
by live pole: experimental and numerical investigations. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 37(3), 601-
618.
xxxviii. Qasim, Sadaf, I. S. H. Harahap, Syed Osman, and Syed Baharom. "Causal factors of Malaysian landslides: A narrative
study." (2013a). Journal of Applied Science , Engineering Technology 5 (7): 2303-2308.
xxxix. Qasim, Sadaf, I. S. H. Harahap, Syed Osman, and Syed Baharom. "Causal factors of Malaysian landslides: A narrative
study." (2013b). Journal of Applied Science , Engineering Technology 5 (7): 2303-2308.
xl. Razak, K. A., Santangelo, M., Van Westen, C. J., Straatsma, M. W., & de Jong, S. M. 2013. Generating an optimal DTM
from airborne laser scanning data for landslide mapping in a tropical forest environment. Geomorphology,190, 112-
125.6
xli. Saadatkhah, N., Kassim, A., & Lee, L. M. 2014a. Hulu Kelang, Malaysia regional mapping of rainfall-induced landslides
using TRIGRS model. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 8(5), 3183-3194.
xlii. Saadatkhah, N., Kassim, A., & Lee, L. M. 2014b. Hulu Kelang, Malaysia regional mapping of rainfall-induced landslides
using TRIGRS model. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 8(5), 3183-3194.
xliii. Salem Almohaifer, Mohammad, Mohamed A. Islam, Abul Kalam Azad, Ahmad Dahlan, and Abdul Rahman.
"COLLABORATIVE DISASTER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM-AN EXPLORATORY FOR LANDSLIDE IN MALAYSIA."
InInternational Management Conference 2011, pp. 1-17. University Sultan Zainal Abidin, 2011.
xliv. Simon, N., Crozier, M., Roiste, M., Rafek, A. G., & Roslee, R. 2015. Time series assessment on landslide occurrences in
an area undergoing development. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 36(1), 98-111.
xlv. Zhou, C. H., C. F. Lee, J. Li, and Z. W. Xu. "On the spatial relationship between landslides and causative factors on
Lantau Island, Hong Kong."Geomorphology 43, no. 3 (2002): 197-207.
xlvi. http://www.preventionweb.net/organizations/5959.
xlvii. Slope Engineering Branch, 2009. “Landslide Statistics in Malaysia for 2007 and 2008” Public Works Department,
Malaysia
xlviii. Public Works Department, 2008. Draft National Slope Master Plan, Slope Engineering Branch, JKR Malaysia
xlix. Mohamed, A. and Abdullah, C. H., 2009. “Landslide and National Slope Policy.” Seminar on Safe Hill-Site
Development, February 14, 2009, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia.
l. Public Works Department, 2006. Terms of reference for National Slope Master Plan Study. JKR Memorandum of
Agreement, No:JKR/IP/CKC/23/2006. JKR Malaysia