A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
Content available from Research in Science Education
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Gestalt and Functionality as Independent Dimensions
of Mental Models in Science
Malte S. Ubben
1
&Stefan Heusler
1
#Springer Nature B.V. 2019
Abstract
In teaching sciences, models are often used to introduce, elaborate or simplify real-world
phenomena or concepts. It is, however, often the case that misconceptions arise from or are
facilitated by these teaching models during their transition to mental models of the individual
learners. For instance, models are often seen as direct replicas of something real—scaled
versions of reality. Even though for architectural models, this approach is sufficient, in physics,
other model types must also be taken into account. In particular, in quantum physics, the ability
for abstract model building is essential. In our exploratory study with 3108 participants, the
dispositions towards models in physics in general and models of the atomic hull in particular
were analysed. Based on this quantitative data, two independent dimensions of the partici-
pants’mental models were extracted: (i) Functional Fidelity and (ii) Fidelity of Gestalt. Based
on these empirical findings, four main types of mental models are proposed.
Keywords Mental models .Quantum physics .Model building in science education .Cognitive
development
Introduction
The creation of mental models is essential for learning and therefore understanding the
generation of mental models is important for education research in general and physics
education in particular (Dutke 1994). They are the depictions and meanings our mind gives
to phenomena and their underlying structures (Rickheit and Sichelschmidt 1999). Mental
models that are deemed insufficient by the scientific community are the subject of many
studies (e.g. for an overview see Schecker et al. 2018). This holds true—again—in a general
sense and particularly in physics education.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-09892-y
*Malte S. Ubben
malte.ubben@uni-muenster.de
1
Institut für Didaktik der Physik, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Wilhelm-Klemm-Str.
10, 48149 Münster, Germany
Published online: 16 September 2019
Research in Science Education (2021) 51:1349–1363
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.