ArticlePublisher preview available

Gestalt and Functionality as Independent Dimensions of Mental Models in Science

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract and Figures

In teaching sciences, models are often used to introduce, elaborate or simplify real-world phenomena or concepts. It is, however, often the case that misconceptions arise from or are facilitated by these teaching models during their transition to mental models of the individual learners. For instance, models are often seen as direct replicas of something real—scaled versions of reality. Even though for architectural models, this approach is sufficient, in physics, other model types must also be taken into account. In particular, in quantum physics, the ability for abstract model building is essential. In our exploratory study with 3108 participants, the dispositions towards models in physics in general and models of the atomic hull in particular were analysed. Based on this quantitative data, two independent dimensions of the participants’ mental models were extracted: (i) Functional Fidelity and (ii) Fidelity of Gestalt. Based on these empirical findings, four main types of mental models are proposed.
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Gestalt and Functionality as Independent Dimensions
of Mental Models in Science
Malte S. Ubben
1
&Stefan Heusler
1
#Springer Nature B.V. 2019
Abstract
In teaching sciences, models are often used to introduce, elaborate or simplify real-world
phenomena or concepts. It is, however, often the case that misconceptions arise from or are
facilitated by these teaching models during their transition to mental models of the individual
learners. For instance, models are often seen as direct replicas of something realscaled
versions of reality. Even though for architectural models, this approach is sufficient, in physics,
other model types must also be taken into account. In particular, in quantum physics, the ability
for abstract model building is essential. In our exploratory study with 3108 participants, the
dispositions towards models in physics in general and models of the atomic hull in particular
were analysed. Based on this quantitative data, two independent dimensions of the partici-
pantsmental models were extracted: (i) Functional Fidelity and (ii) Fidelity of Gestalt. Based
on these empirical findings, four main types of mental models are proposed.
Keywords Mental models .Quantum physics .Model building in science education .Cognitive
development
Introduction
The creation of mental models is essential for learning and therefore understanding the
generation of mental models is important for education research in general and physics
education in particular (Dutke 1994). They are the depictions and meanings our mind gives
to phenomena and their underlying structures (Rickheit and Sichelschmidt 1999). Mental
models that are deemed insufficient by the scientific community are the subject of many
studies (e.g. for an overview see Schecker et al. 2018). This holds trueagainin a general
sense and particularly in physics education.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-09892-y
*Malte S. Ubben
malte.ubben@uni-muenster.de
1
Institut für Didaktik der Physik, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Wilhelm-Klemm-Str.
10, 48149 Münster, Germany
Published online: 16 September 2019
Research in Science Education (2021) 51:1349–1363
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.
... Egy 3108 középiskolás diákot vizsgáló német tanulmányban feltártak egy kétdimenziós struktúrát, amely alkalmas a tanulók atomokról alkotott gondolati modelljeinek leírására [73]. ...
... • Az alaki ragaszkodás leírja, hogy a gondolati modellek mennyire a kinézetre összpontosítanak, és mennyire tekinthetőek a jelenségek vizuális ábrázolásának [73][74]. Az erős alaki ragaszkodású diákok vizuális képeket építenek fel fejükben, és gyakran hiszik, hogy ezek a valóság hű, nagyított képei. ...
... • A funkcionális ragaszkodás azt skálázza, hogy a gondolati modellek mennyire a jelenségek leírására törekednek, és erre milyen elvont fogalmakat használnak [73][74]. Például a Bohrmodell jó közelítéssel írja le a hidrogénatom spektrumát. ...
... Additionally, how models are understood by learners has been at the core of several studies [9][10][11]. Previous research points towards a two-factorial structure of students' perceptions of quantum models that has been shown to explain a significant amount of the variance [11,12]: These two factors were coined 'Fidelity of Gestalt' and 'Functional Fidelity, ' and will be described and contextualized in the existing body of literature on students' conceptual development in the research background Sect. 2 of this paper. ...
... One of the more recent endeavors to describe how learners understand models in science, refers to what we summarize as the Gestalt-Function-hypothesis according to which (quantum) models are perceived depending on the degrees of 'Fidelity of Gestalt' and 'Functional Fidelity' in students' thinking: The Gestalt-Function-hypothesis was first in principle proposed by Ubben and Heusler [12,17] and was based on an exploratory factor analysis of students' statements about physics models in general and about statements of various models for the atomic shell in particular. The results indicated a latent two-factor structure describing the ideas about models held by the 3108 participants surveyed. ...
... The results indicated a latent two-factor structure describing the ideas about models held by the 3108 participants surveyed. The two factors extracted were summarized as follows [12] . However, the results of this first study were only a description of how models of a very minor part of quantum physics (namely atoms) were perceived by learners, and it was thus by no means clear that the two-factor structure reported was generalisable to other areas of quantum physics, or even physics and sciences in general. ...
Article
Full-text available
In previous research, it has been argued that many of the student (mis-)conceptions of quantum concepts described in the literature as widespread among learners can be traced back to poorly developed (quantum) model perceptions that hinder the learning of quantum physics. In particular, it has been shown that the degrees of two cognitive dimensions, namely Functional Fidelity and Fidelity of Gestalt, in students’ thinking account for a substantial amount of the variance in students’ model perceptions in quantum physics and may therefore be useful for describing and understanding the (development of) students’ conceptions of quantum physics topics. So far, however, the cognitive dimensions Functional Fidelity and Fidelity of Gestalt have only been investigated in exploratory studies. In this article, we report the results of a confirmatory factor analysis of data collected from N = 179 secondary school students using an instrument adapted from the literature to assess learners’ perceptions of the photon model. The results of our study provide empirical evidence that the two-factor model of learners’ model perceptions in the quantum context is indeed a good fit to the data. Together with literature from science education research on students’ conceptual development, and taking into account earlier findings on Fidelity of Function and Gestalt Fidelity we derive a plausible description of students’ conceptual development in the context of quantum physics – leading to what we call the Fidelities-Model of Conceptual Development. We discuss this framework in the light of previous research and argue for its potential generalisability beyond the teaching and learning of quantum physics topics. The implications of our findings for both science education research and practice are presented.
... Instead, the preparation, time evolution, and measurement of a particular quantum state are described (e.g., using Dirac notation) [26]. Functional fidelity is used to describe the mental models of students in QP [27,28]. It indicates "how far the mental models [...] were thought of as appropriate descriptions of how phenomena work-what abstract concepts underly the corresponding models" [27] (p. ...
... Functional fidelity is used to describe the mental models of students in QP [27,28]. It indicates "how far the mental models [...] were thought of as appropriate descriptions of how phenomena work-what abstract concepts underly the corresponding models" [27] (p. 1356). ...
... If a mental model is not useful for providing an adequate explanation of a given phenomenon or process, an individual will modify their underlying mental model to better align with the observed reality. Progress on the research into the nature of learners' mental models was achieved in a recent study by Ubben and Heusler [27]: They uncovered a twodimensional structure underlying students' mental models of the atomic hull, with one dimension being functional fidelity and the other dimension being fidelity of Gestalt [27]. Fidelity of Gestalt describes "how far the mental models [...] were understood as exact visual representations of phenomena of exact depictions of how things look" [27] (p. ...
Article
Full-text available
Evidence from physics education research suggests that the introduction of a formalistic description of quantum phenomena can be beneficial to student learning, particularly in terms of helping students move away from naive realist views of quanta or space-time descriptions of quantum phenomena. However, the mathematical requirements for mastering quantum formalism are typically far beyond the scope of secondary school education. Therefore, in previous research, we have proposed a reduced Dirac notation tailored to the capabilities of secondary school students, which is included in a novel teaching-learning sequence. However, the cognitive processes of students when confronted with an introduction to quantum physics via a reduced Dirac notation have not been thoroughly investigated: In particular, it seems important to investigate whether this approach is actually beneficial to students’ learning and to explore the learning difficulties students are likely to encounter in such a setting. This paper contributes to this research gap by reporting the findings of an acceptance survey: N = 14 learners participated in one-on-one interviews following a protocol consisting of four cyclical phases (information phase, acceptance evaluation, paraphrasing phase, and application phase). The findings of our study indicate that the instructional elements within our new teaching-learning sequence were generally well accepted by students but also revealed learning difficulties that students may encounter. Thus, on the one hand, the findings of this study pave the way for future research on students’ learning of quantum physics using Dirac notation. On the other hand, the in-depth findings reported here may guide teachers in designing learning environments that introduce Dirac notation at the upper secondary school and introductory university levels. Published by the American Physical Society 2024
... 2.1). Ubben and Heusler investigated students' conceptions about the atomic shell, and identified a two-dimensional structure of the mental models held by students and designated these two dimensions as "Fidelity of Gestalt" and "Functional Fidelity" [19]. Subsequent studies have evidenced that this twodimensional structure can be used to describe learners' mental models of the photon [17], and that there is a correlation between the conceptual understanding of QP and the degree of Functional Fidelity in students' thinking about photons [20]. ...
... A variety of theoretical frameworks have been developed with the purpose of describing mental models and the manner in which they are constructed (e.g. [18,19]). One of these frameworks has been developed within the context of QP [19]. ...
... [18,19]). One of these frameworks has been developed within the context of QP [19]. In their research, Ubben and Heusler identified a two-dimensional structure that underlies learners' mental models of the atomic shell [19]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Previous research has consistently demonstrated that students often possess an inadequate understanding of fundamental quantum optics concepts, even after formal instruction. Findings from physics education research suggest that introducing a mathematical formalism to describe quantum optical phenomena may enhance students’ conceptual understanding of quantum optics. This paper investigates whether using formal descriptions of quantum optics phenomena – such as photon anticorrelation at a beamsplitter or single-photon interference in a Michelson interferometer – expressed in Dirac notation, can support secondary school students in developing functional thinking about photons. To investigate this, we conducted a clusterrandomized field study, comparing the improvement in functional thinking between 67 students in the intervention group, who were taught using both qualitative and quantitative reasoning, and 66 students in the control group, who were taught using only qualitative reasoning. The results indicate that mathematical formalism can indeed promote functional thinking about photons. However, the comparison between the intervention and control groups revealed that the control group exhibited a greater increase in functional thinking than the intervention group. In response to these findings, we conducted a follow-up study aimed at gaining a deeper understanding of the cognitive load associated with both approaches. Specifically, we compared the intrinsic and extraneous cognitive load of 71 students in the intervention group with those of 65 students in the control group. The data analysis revealed that the two groups had statistically significant differences in intrinsic cognitive load while the extraneous cognitive load did not difer statistically significant, indicating a higher mental effort associated to the quantitative reasoning.
... Through the analysis of students' mental representations, it is possible to identify alternative conceptions and plan better teaching strategies to facilitate students' cognitive development (Ubben et al., 2022). Therefore, mental representations and mental models are essential for learning, and their investigation is crucial for science education research (Ubben & Heusler, 2021). ...
... Moreover, this research contributes to the understanding of mental representation formation in complex scientific topics like GR (Ubben et al., 2022). The results presented emphasize the importance of using multiple external mediations to support conceptual understanding, thereby extending existing theories on mental model development in science education (Ubben & Heusler, 2021). By examining how students construct and apply mental representations of curved spacetime, we have provided insights into the cognitive processes involved in learning abstract scientific concepts. ...
Article
Full-text available
This study explores the influence of external resources on students’ construction of mental representations of curved spacetime and their understanding of General Relativity (GR). Using the Cognitive Mediation Networks Theory (CMNT) as the theoretical framework, a short extracurricular course with Year-12 students was developed. Through the course, we investigated how interactions with various external resources support the development of mental representations that facilitate reasoning about relativistic phenomena. Using a case study with qualitative analysis, data from pre/post-tests, interviews, gesture analysis, and student artifacts revealed distinct patterns between students with satisfactory and limited understanding of curved spacetime; students expressed their understanding using multiple representations that reflected their mental representations. Students with accurate conceptions exhibited similar imagistic mental representations associated with the rubber-sheet analogy within psychophysical and hypercultural tools, applying them to explain various situations. Conversely, students with limited curved spacetime conceptions attributed spatial phenomena to forces and associated time dilation with being in ‘outer space’. The findings underscore the importance of carefully selecting external resources, considering students’ prior knowledge, and addressing misconceptions in GR instruction.
... In general, the aim in learning environments-whether in traditional instructional materials, multimedia-based instruction, or technology-enhanced approaches such as AR/VR-is to reduce difficulties that can arise from misconceptions in visual-graphical representations. More attention needs to be paid to shape, dimension, and preconceptions to avoid misunderstandings [1,64,79]. The exclusion of one statement (B) has shown that it is difficult to judge on the basis of statements whether visual-graphical representations can cause or reinforce misconceptions or difficulties. ...
Article
Full-text available
In quantum physics (QP) education, the use of representations such as diagrams and visual aids that connect to mathematical concepts is crucial. Research in representation theory indicates that combining symbolic-mathematical elements (e.g., formulae) with visual-graphical representations enhances conceptual understanding more effectively than representations that merely depict phenomena. However, common representations vary widely, and existing category systems do not adequately distinguish between them in QP. To address this, we developed a new set of differentiation criteria based on insights from representation research, QP education, and specific aspects of the quantum sciences. We created a comprehensive category system for evaluating visual QP representations for educational use, grounded in Ainsworths (2006) DeFT Framework. Twenty-one experts from four countries evaluated this category system using four qubit representations: the Bloch sphere, Circle Notation, Quantum Bead, and the pie chart (Qake) model. This evaluation enabled us to assess the discriminative power of our criteria and to gain expert-based insights into the perceived effectiveness of each representation in supporting the learning of QP concepts. It evaluated how well each representation conveyed quantum concepts such as quantum state, measurement, superposition, entanglement, and quantum technologies (X-, Z-, and H-gates) across 16 criteria. The results showed significant differences in the effectiveness of these representations, particularly in conveying key concepts like superposition and measurement from an expert perspective. Additionally, expert ratings indicated notable variations in the potential of each representation to induce misconceptions, linked to differences in shape, measurement behaviour, and requirements for understanding entanglement. We also discuss considerations for developing new representations and suggest directions for future empirical studies.
... Using exploratory factor analysis, Treagust et al. identified five factors, namely models as "multiple representations", as "exact replicas" and as "explanatory tools", the "uses of scientific model", and the "changing nature of models". Later, Ubben and Heusler [12] combined these instruments with context-specific questions related to models of the atomic shell. Using exploratory factor analysis, two main factors were identified with regard to this context: The first factor is Fidelity of Gestalt (FG), which describes the extent to which models are understood to be accurate visual representations of phenomena or accurate representations of how things look, and the extent to which the gestalt of the models is perceived to be accurate. ...
Preprint
Full-text available
Visual models play a crucial role in both science and science communication. However, the distinction between mere analogies and mathematically sound graphical representations is not easy and can be misunderstood not only by laypeople but also within academic literature itself. Moreover, even when the graphical representation exactly corresponds to the mathematical model, its interpretation is often far from obvious. In this paper we discuss the "potential landscape" visualization commonly used for tipping points in the context of nonlinear dynamics and reveal potential pitfalls, in particular when distinguishing bifurcation induced tipping (B-tipping) from noise-induced tipping (N-tipping). We propose new visualization techniques for tipping dynamics, carefully distinguishing between B- and N-tipping as well as between single systems and ensembles of systems. Explicitly, we apply these visualizations both to molecular cell biology and to climate science in order to reveal the crucial differences in the interpretation of the visual models. We find that it is crucial to explicitly discuss the assumptions made within the visual model and to be aware of the risk of misinterpretation. Based on these findings, we propose as a next step to investigate individual mental models induced by these visualizations in the framework of empirical research.
... In general, the aim in learning environments is to reduce difficulties that can be caused by misconceptions in visual-graphical representations. More attention needs to be paid to shape, dimension, and preconceptions to avoid misunderstandings [35,49,64]. The exclusion of one statement (B) has shown that it is difficult to judge on the basis of statements whether visual-graphical representations can cause or reinforce misconceptions or difficulties. ...
Preprint
Full-text available
In quantum physics (QP) education, the use of representations such as diagrams and visual aids that connect to mathematical concepts is crucial. Research in representation theory indicates that combining symbolic-mathematical elements (e.g. formulae) with visual-graphical representations enhances conceptual understanding more effectively than representations that merely depict phenomena. However, common representations vary widely, and existing categorisation systems do not adequately distinguish between them in QP. To address this, we developed a new set of differentiation criteria based on insights from representation research, QP education, and specific aspects of the quantum sciences. We created a comprehensive category system for evaluating visual QP representations for educational use, grounded in Ainsworths (2006) DeFT Framework. Twenty-one experts from four countries evaluated this category system using four qubit representations: the Bloch sphere, Circle Notation, Quantum Bead, and the pie chart (Qake) model. This evaluation enabled us to assess the discriminative power of our criteria and the effectiveness of each representation in supporting the learning of QP concepts. It evaluated how well each representation conveyed quantum concepts such as quantum state, measurement, superposition, entanglement, and quantum technologies (X-, Z-, and H-gates) across 16 criteria. The results showed significant differences in the effectiveness of these representations, particularly in conveying key concepts like superposition and measurement. Additionally, expert ratings indicated notable variations in the potential of each representation to induce misconceptions, linked to differences in shape, measurement behaviour, and requirements for understanding entanglement. We also discuss considerations for developing new representations and suggest directions for future empirical studies.
... Nuclear science is a fundamental area of study in contemporary physics, with many pertinent implications such as radioactive decomposition and nuclear Fusion and division. In the Karlsruhe, Germany Nuclid Chart and the Brookhaven, Maryland National Laboratory's Diagram of Elements, both of which are accessible on the internet, isotopic elements with varying numbers of neutrons N are listed as a generalization of the periodic structure of factors, categorized as aspects according to the amount Z of electrons [1,2]. ...
Article
Full-text available
An empirical framework that accurately describes radioactive binding energies is the Somewhat Empirical Mass Equation (SEMF). They showcase many implementations and uses of the idea that rely on graphics and printed objects. A key new addition is a contrast with real experiments, as well as a visualization of the energy environment as supplied by the SEMF. The shortcomings of the empirical theory are shown by our visualization of this differential energy scenery, which also highlights the significance of what is known as magic numbers—an explanation provided by the outermost approach, which was developed much more recently than the water drop theory. This provides a great chance to talk about the advantages and limitations of simulations everywhere within the framework of science teaching.
Thesis
Full-text available
This doctoral thesis investigates the mental representations and conceptions of high school students about Relativity Theory, focusing on the General Relativity (GR). The research, grounded in the Cognitive Mediation Networks Theory (CMNT), explores how different levels of external mediation influence the development of mental representations and students’ understanding of complex and counterintuitive concepts, such as curved spacetime and gravitational time dilation. The research consists of three experiments: Cohort 1, derived from the master’s research, analyses students’ mental representations of Special Relativity, serving as a basis for the subsequent experiments. Cohort 2 and 3, conducted in the format of extracurricular mini courses, investigate how students construct mental representations of GR concepts. The data collected through pre-tests, post-tests, interviews, gesture analysis, and student-produced materials reveal a strong connection between the consistency of mental representations and conceptual understanding. Students with well-defined pictorial mental representations, often developed through interactions with computer simulations and the rubber-sheet model, demonstrated better understanding of curved spacetime. On the other hand, gravitational time dilation was more frequently understood through propositional representations, formed through classroom discussions and exercises. The research shows the influence of different levels of external mediation on the construction of drivers, which manifest as mental representations. Computer simulations, the rubber-sheet model, group discussions, teacher explanations, cultural references such as the movie Interstellar, and Generative Artificial Intelligence tools contributed variably to students’ understanding. The conclusion is that a multimodal approach, recognizing the value of diverse resources working collaboratively, is essential for effective learning of GR. The CMNT proves to be an effective theoretical reference for analysing and understanding the dynamic interaction of external mediations in the formation of internal representations, providing valuable insights for curriculum planning and pedagogical practices, and the integration of AI tools in physics education.
Article
Full-text available
Science education research has revealed a number of students’ mental models for the atomic structure, among which, the one based on the Bohr’s model seems to be the most dominant. The aim of the current study is to investigate the coherence of these models when students apply them for the explanation of a variety of situations. For this purpose, a set of six tasks describing different everyday situations were given to 225 students of the 10th and 11th grades of secondary schools from Northern Greece. Quantitative analysis of students’ responses using Latent Class Analysis (LCA) showed that there is no consistency between models across the tasks and that the context of the task affects the distribution of students’ responses across models. Qualitative analysis showed a variety of pieces of knowledge from different models that students combine when manipulating the tasks, which possibly cause a lack of consistency within each one of the models. The findings are discussed in terms of between and within models’ consistency, whereas the conclusions contribute to the debate concerning the coherent vs fragmented knowledge hypotheses. The empirical evidence provided by the analysis clearly demonstrates that student mental models for the atomic structure were not coherent when applying in different everyday situations. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.
Article
Full-text available
This study presents a review of the current state of research on teaching quantum mechanics in secondary and lower undergraduate education. A conceptual approach to quantum mechanics is being implemented in more and more introductory physics courses around the world. Because of the differences between the conceptual nature of quantum mechanics and classical physics, research on misconceptions, testing, and teaching strategies for introductory quantum mechanics is needed. For this review, 74 articles were selected and analyzed for the misconceptions, research tools, teaching strategies, and multimedia applications investigated. Outcomes were categorized according to their contribution to the various subtopics of quantum mechanics. Analysis shows that students have difficulty relating quantum physics to physical reality. It also shows that the teaching of complex quantum behavior, such as time dependence, superposition, and the measurement problem, has barely been investigated for the secondary and lower undergraduate level. At the secondary school level, this article shows a need to investigate student difficulties concerning wave functions and potential wells. Investigation of research tools shows the necessity for the development of assessment tools for secondary and lower undergraduate education, which cover all major topics and are suitable for statistical analysis. Furthermore, this article shows the existence of very diverse ideas concerning teaching strategies for quantum mechanics and a lack of research into which strategies promote understanding. This article underlines the need for more empirical research into student difficulties, teaching strategies, activities, and research tools intended for a conceptual approach for quantum mechanics.
Article
Full-text available
The current study aims to investigate students’ representations of the atomic structure in a number of student cohorts with specific characteristics concerning age, grade, class curriculum and some individual differences, such as formal reasoning and field dependence/independence. Two specific task contexts, which were designed in accordance with corresponding teaching contexts for the atomic structure, one based on Bohr’s model and one on the quantum mechanical model, were examined as for their potential to differentiate initial students’ representations of the atomic structure (when no specific context was provided). Participants (n = 421) were students of 8th, 10th and 12th grades of secondary schools from Northern Greece. Results showed that, although developmental factors, like formal reasoning, were associated with a better representation of the atomic structure, task context appeared to have the dominant role, since positive associations were found between student cohort characteristics and representation of the atomic structure in context dependent tasks, even after accounting for the effects of individual differences.
Conference Paper
Full-text available
Die seit 2001 im Internet existente Plattform milq zur Quantenphysik, deren Ziel es ist, das komplizierte Thema verständlicher zu machen, wird an der TU Braunschweig im Institut für Fach-didaktik der Naturwissenschaften (IFdN), Abteilung Physik und Physikdidaktik überarbeitet und erweitert. Ein Beispiel für die inhaltliche Erweiterung ist die Neugestaltung einer Blended-E-Learning-Unterrichtseinheit zur Quantenphysik in der Sekundarstufe II. Das Konzept entspricht dabei einer Modulbauweise, die einen flexiblen Einsatz nach den Erfordernissen und Bedürfnissen der Lehrkräfte ermöglicht und sich in seiner Methodik nach den Kompetenzen des Kern-curriculums richtet. In diesem Beitrag wird zunächst kurz auf das Internetportal milq und seine Neuerungen ein-gegangen, um dann etwas ausführlicher die Unterrichtseinheit zu besprechen.
Article
Full-text available
Most undergraduate chemistry courses and a few high school honors courses, which focus on physical chemistry and quantum mechanics, are highly mathematically-oriented. At the Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, we developed a new module for high school students, titled Chemistry – From “the Hole” to “the Whole”: From the Nanoscale to Microelectronics. The module is based on a qualitative approach to teaching quantum chemistry, emphasizing interdisciplinary real-life applications and integration of visualization. While aimed at honors high school chemistry students, the module was also partially implemented and assessed in an undergraduate chemistry course. The research objective was to investigate the effect of the module on the visual and textual understanding of quantum mechanical concepts among 122 honors and 65 volunteer undergraduate chemistry students. The research tools included students' pre- and post-questionnaires. High school honors and undergraduate students, who were exposed to the module, significantly improved their textual and visual understanding of quantum mechanical concepts and their ability to move across illustrations and explanations. Honors and undergraduate students minimized the gap that had existed between them in terms of integrating micro and quantum levels into their post-questionnaire answers. Our findings augment the current set of the four chemistry understanding levels – macro, micro, symbol and process – by adding the quantum mechanical level as a fifth level of chemistry understanding. The study contributes to teaching physical chemistry by providing a tool for learning, assessment, and research of chemistry understanding via both visual and textual modes.
Book
Dieses Lehrbuch hilft Lehramtsstudierenden, Referendaren und Lehrkräften der Physik besser zu verstehen, was sich hinter Schüleraussagen versteckt. Oft weichen Schülerantworten im Physikunterricht von dem ab, was man als Lehrkraft erwartet oder erhofft. Dahinter stehen Vorstellungen, die von den Alltagserfahrungen der Schülerinnen und Schüler geprägt sind. Für das Unterrichten und das Lernen von Physik ist von zentraler Bedeutung, was die Kinder und Jugendlichen an Vorwissen, Vorstellungen und Denkmustern bereits mitbringen. Auf dieser Grundlage verarbeiten Lernende neue Informationen. Die Autorinnen und Autoren stellen den Erkenntnisstand über Schülervorstellungen zu physikalischen Begriffen dar und stellen Lösungsmöglichkeiten für Probleme im Schulunterricht vor. In den ersten drei Kapiteln werden die theoretischen Grundlagen sowie Strategien des Umgangs mit Schülervorstellungen bei der Unterrichtsgestaltung erläutert. In zehn folgenden Themenkapiteln werden konkrete Schülervorstellungen vorgestellt, ihre Hintergründe erklärt und Vorschläge gemacht, wie man mit diesem Wissen Lernangebote besser gestalten kann. Die Inhaltsbereiche erstrecken sich vom Anfangsunterricht in der Grundschule bis hin zur gymnasialen Oberstufe. Dazu zählen die Mechanik, Optik, Elektrizitätslehre, Wärmelehre, Quantenphysik und weitere Gebiete sowie allgemeine Vorstellungen über die Physik als Wissenschaft. Die Leserinnen und Leser werden: - typische Schülervorstellungen in wichtigen Gebieten der Physik kennen, - auf Basis dieses Wissens Lernschwierigkeiten bei Schülerinnen und Schülern diagnostizieren können, - wissen, wie man Lernenden helfen kann, ihre Vorstellungen weiterzuentwickeln, - wissen, wo man Unterrichtskonzeptionen findet, die Schülervorstellungen berücksichtigen, - Möglichkeiten kennen, wie man Schülervorstellungen bei der Unterrichtsplanung und -durchführung berücksichtigen kann, und nicht zuletzt - die eigenen Vorstellungen zu zentralen physikalischen Konzepten fachlich durchdacht haben. Schülervorstellungen sind auch ein guter Anlass, die grundlegenden Begrifflichkeiten der Physik für sich selbst noch einmal fachlich zu durchdenken. Hierzu regt das vorliegende Lehrbuch mit fachlichen Erläuterungen an. Die Herausgeber Prof. Dr. Horst Schecker, Universität Bremen Prof. Dr. Thomas Wilhelm, Universität Frankfurt am Main Prof. Dr. Martin Hopf, Universität Wien Prof. Dr. Dr. h. c. Reinders Duit, IPN, Universität Kiel
Article
Atomic theory or the nature of matter is a principal concept in science and science education. This has, however, been complicated by the difficulty students have in learning the concept and the subsequent construction of many alternative models. To understand better the conceptual barriers to learning atomic structure, this study explores the troublesome nature of this fundamental scientific concept. In order to illustrate the distinction of student understanding by threshold barriers, this study chose three particularly high-achieving students from an original interview sample of 20 students who were selected from an introductory college chemistry course. The pre-course and post-course interview responses were examined and compared in detail. This study considers the concepts of 'probability' and 'energy quantization' to both describe the structure of the threshold of understanding students' need to negotiate in their construction of the target model of atomic structure. In this respect, this study suggests atomic structure as a possible threshold concept for further study in science. Identifying the nature and structure of the threshold of understanding confronting students, and analyzing the troublesomeness of atomic structure, provides valuable information for understanding student learning difficulties, and insight into how they may be addressed.
Article
College level students are expected to be able to make sense of, and explain, aspects of chemical bonding and structure in terms of molecular orbital concepts. The present paper derives from in-depth research into the thinking of a small sample of college chemistry students. This study in one UK college revealed the ways in which students found the orbital concept problematic. A previous paper (“Conceptualizing quanta: illuminating the ground state of student understanding of atomic orbitals”) reports how these students struggled to make sense of atomic structure in orbital terms. The present paper considers the students’ understanding of the molecular orbital concept. It is suggested that when learners are introduced to ideas about molecular orbitals before they have mastered ideas about atomic systems, then their learning difficulties may be ‘compounded’ in the more complex context. For example, it was found that students often identified the orbitals involved in two-centre bonds as atomic orbitals. Representations of delocalised bonds invoked various alternative interpretations: but were seldom conceptualised as implying poly-centred molecular orbitals. These findings suggest that students are not given sufficient time to construct acceptable models of atoms and molecules as ‘quanticles’. [Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. Eur.: 2002, 3, 159-173]
Article
This paper presents and discusses data relating to student understanding of the orbital concept and related ideas at college level (i.e. between secondary and university level education). The data derives from in-depth research into the thinking of a small sample of U.K. students. Students enter this level of study having been explicitly taught a quantum theory of matter (i.e. the particle model), and implicitly introduced to the quantization of charge. The key principles of quantization of energy and angular momentum are important at the college level when students are taught about orbitals, energy levels and quantum numbers. Interview extracts provide insights into the students’ attempts to make sense of these unfamiliar and abstract ideas. It is suggested that this is an area where there is a genuine pedagogic problem: capable and motivated students struggle to learn from experienced and knowledgeable teachers. The present paper describes how students conceptualized these key aspects of the atomic model. A subsequent paper (“Compounding quanta: probing the frontiers of student understanding of molecular orbitals”) considers how the same group of students applied their thinking in the more complex context of molecular systems. [Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. Eur.: 2002, 3, 145-158]
Article
This chapter reviews the mental model construct in cognitive science. The chapter discusses the definitions and aspects of mental models. To demonstrate the usefulness of the mental conceptualization, the chapter presents applications in the domain of discourse comprehension and production. Mental models play a central and unifying role in representing objects, states of affairs, sequences of events, the way the world is, and the social and psychological activities of daily life. The major problem of the mental model approach lies in the fact that the external world is to be represented in a highly specific way. Representing indeterminacy in terms of mental models, thus, poses difficulties, casting some doubt on the contention that mental models can do without variables. The major advantage of the mental model approach lies in the fact that the influence of individual knowledge can be handled with relative ease. Mental models provide a straightforward explanation of several phenomena that are difficult to explain by more traditional accounts.