ArticlePDF Available

Screen-Time and Vocabulary Development: Evidence from the Growing Up in Ireland Study

Authors:
  • Mary Immaculate College University of Limerick

Abstract

Screen time has long been of interest to psychologists, parents, and those working with young children. However, what “screen time” is has changed since the introduction of touchscreen devices over the last decade. Therefore, it is important to differentiate between screen time and the type of activity (e.g., television, video games, educational games) when examining the effect of screen use on children’s development. The ‘Growing Up in Ireland’ (GUI) study is a government-funded, nationally-representative, longitudinal study following the development of young children in Ireland throughout their childhood from 9 months of age. Using these data from the GUI study allowed an investigation of the amount and type of screen use young Irish children are engaged in, and also to explore what impact screen use has on vocabulary development in 5 year old children.
Screen-Time and Vocabulary Development:
Evidence from the Growing Up in Ireland Study
Chloe Beatty and Suzanne M. Egan,
Department of Psychology, Mary Immaculate College, University of Limerick
Citation: Beatty, C. & Egan, S.M. (2018). Screen-Time and Vocabulary Development:
Evidence from the Growing Up in Ireland Study. ChildLinks - Children and the Digital
Environment, 3, 18-22.
Introduction
Screen time has long been of interest to psychologists, parents, and those working with young
children. The last few decades have seen a considerable amount of research exploring the
effects of television viewing on children’s development. However, what “screen time” is has
changed since the introduction of touchscreen devices over the last decade. Research indicates
that children are becoming proficient at using these devices at a young age. Marsh et al. (2015)
found that by 3 years of age, nearly two-thirds of the 2,000 children in their study were able to
effectively navigate a tablet, including the ability to turn it on and off, drag and swipe, and
open and exit apps. McClure, Chentsova-Dutton, Barr, Holochwost, and Parrott (2015) and
Rideout (2011; 2013) also noted the rise in toddlers’ touchscreen use from 10% using
touchscreens daily in 2010, to 38% using them daily in 2013. In contrast, daily television
viewing decreased in the same time period from 79% of toddlers to 63%.
The potential ways in which young children can interact with screens has changed over
the last 10 years. Touchscreens allow for increased opportunities for early learning as
operational barriers, such as using a mouse or keyboard, are less prevalent (Merchant, 2015).
However, the increased range of screen types with which young children can interact (e.g.,
television, smart phone, tablet), and the increased range of activities (e.g., cartoons, video
games, educational games, online video chat) present a challenge to researchers and policy
makers hoping to draw on a strong evidence base to inform policy and practice. Previous
research examining the impact of screen time on early childhood development, much of which
focuses on television viewing, raises questions as to whether or not these findings extend to
other types of screens and activities.
Therefore, it is important to differentiate between screen time, type, and content when
measuring the effect of screen use on children’s development. This distinction may provide a
more nuanced classification of screen use, rather than just screen time, appropriate to the
variety of screen uses young children today engage in. As different elements of screen use are
considered separately, their impacts on various aspects of development, such as social
interaction, attention, reasoning, and notably language development, can be explored and
understood.
Screen Use and Language Development
One of the major skills acquired, amongst many others, in the first few years of life is the ability
to use language and communicate. Many factors are known to support language development
during early childhood, such as talking or reading to infants (e.g., Murray & Egan, 2014; Hoyne
& Egan, 2019), but the role of screen use in language development is less clear. Television
viewing has gained a lot of attention in past research for having negative effects on children’s
language development, and other aspects of cognitive development, such as attention and skill
transferability (Anderson & Pempek, 2005; Zimmerman, Christakis & Meltzoff, 2007;
Courage & Setliff, 2009). However, findings from an extensive review of the topic (Barr,
Lauricella, Zack, & Calvert, 2010) suggest that it is difficult to compare across studies
investigating the impact of early television exposure on child development due to the range of
variables that affect just what “screen time” actually involves for different children.
For example, Obel et al. (2004) reported that only 6% of their Danish sample of 3-year-
olds were exposed to more than 2 hours of television per day. In contrast, Christakis,
Zimmerman, DiGiuseppe and McCarty (2004) reported that the average amount of screen time
for American 3-year-olds was 3.6 hours a day. Different average rates of television viewing or
screen use in different countries, and in different studies, along with differences in the ages of
participants in these studies, mean it is difficult to draw conclusions from the literature or to
generalise the results found relating to the impact of screen time (Barr et al., 2010). An example
of these inconsistencies can be seen in screen time’s apparently varied association with both
positive and negative effects for language development in the previous research.
For example, Linebarger and Walker (2005) examined 30-month-olds’ language
development in relation to what content the children were exposed to, particularly focusing on
television programmes designed for children versus adults. The research showed that
programmes such as ‘Dora the Explorer’, ‘Blue’s Clues’, ‘Arthur’, and Clifford’ were
associated with enhanced vocabulary growth. In contrast, viewing mostly adult or older-child
programming was associated with reduced vocabulary. Findings such as these highlight the
importance of considering different aspects of screen time (e.g., the amount of time, type of
content) that may play a role in development.
Other research also supports the idea that different aspects of screen time have different
impacts on development. Kostyrka-Allchorne, Cooper and Simpson (2017) conducted a
systematic literature review of television exposure and its impact on children’s development
and behaviour from 1997 to 2015. It was evident from this analysis that content had more of
an impact on children’s cognitive development than overall duration of screen time itself. The
review suggested that, irrelevant of amount of screen time, early exposure to adult-directed
programmes or violent content was shown to be associated with language delays as well as
lower executive functioning and lower school grades (Anderson & Bushman, 2001; Linebarger
& Walker, 2005; Barr et al., 2010; Sharif & Sargent, 2006).
Similarly, while Zimmerman et al. (2007) found that infants had lower vocabulary
scores with each hour per day viewing baby DVDs, Lavigne, Hanson, and Anderson (2015)
suggested that this negative effect is reduced when parents engage with their children during
screen time. Parents in this study were more likely to introduce new words into their children’s
vocabulary than parents who used screen time for free play. This increased vocabulary richness
was also seen during a 15-minute post-viewing free play session. Findings such as these
highlight the difficulty with drawing firm conclusions about the effect of television viewing on
language development. It is clear that other factors besides the screen time, such as the type of
content and the amount of parental interaction, also affect language development.
Another screen factor that may affect development is the type of screen related activity
the child is engaged in and the type of screen. Neumann (2018) noted that the high prevalence
of digital devices in homes and schools is resulting in children using tablets as a learning
device. Neumann found that children could significantly enhance their emergent literacy skills
when using an iPad compared to traditional teaching tools, with the children in the iPad
condition showing higher letter name and sound knowledge, and name writing skills.
Electronic books (e-book), another form of screen time, have also been shown to promote
vocabulary acquisition and reading comprehension due to their integrated animations, graphic
effects, and synced audio sounds, creating an immersive and interactive learning experience
(Radesky, Schumacher, & Zuckerman, 2015).
However, much of the experimental research on learning from e-books and iPads, as
opposed to traditional methods, has shown mixed results in relation to story comprehension
and further literacy outcomes (Aladé, Lauricella, Beaudoin-Ryan, & Wartella, 2016).
Examples of such research include Lauricella, Barr and Calvert’s (2014) study, which found
no difference in comprehension across the two platforms, while Krcmar and Cingel (2014)
conducted a very similar study and found reading from a paper book resulted in significantly
greater story comprehension. Findings from other studies related to e-books are also
inconclusive, with many contributing different findings based on children’s ability to learn
from interactive storybooks (Aladé et al., 2016). This highlights that, much like other
research on screen activities, there is no consistent evidence for the benefits or drawbacks of
e-books or iPads, for children’s literacy skills or for language development.
These inconsistencies have become a common theme in screen use research, with some
researchers noting that other factors, such as a good night’s sleep or skipping meals, have a far
greater effect on children’s cognitive development than screen time itself (Przybylski &
Weinstein, 2017). With some studies noting inconsistent findings and others with small effects
sizes, there is debate about what impact, if any, screen time alone has on children’s
development (Ferguson, 2015; Etchells, Gage, Rutherford, & Munafò, 2016). This may
particularly be the case when considering the effect of screen use on development during early
childhood. It is important that practices intended to enhance child development in the early
years are based on strong research evidence (Egan & Pope, 2019).
Young children today can interact with screens in a way that was not possible prior to
the recent wide availability of touchscreen technology. Therefore, research examining the
impact of screen use (including screen time and activity) in early childhood, beyond the impact
of television viewing, is necessary to understand what effect, if any, this screen use is having
on child development. As LaForge, Perron, Roy-Charland, Roy and Carignan (2018, p. 320)
note ‘It is easy to be misled when we rely on our intuition or reasoning, hence the importance
of research. One of the reasons we conduct research is usually to provide evidence or lack
thereof for current beliefs and practices.’
Screen Use in the Growing Up in Ireland Study
The ‘Growing Up in Ireland’ (GUI) study is a government-funded, nationally-representative,
longitudinal study following the development of young children in Ireland throughout their
childhood from 9 months of age (GUI, 2010). The sample of participants in the GUI Infant
Cohort was drawn from the Child Benefit Registrar as it allowed for participants sampling from
all socio-economic backgrounds, and encompassed all family types living in Ireland with
children. Data collection began in 2008 at the first wave, with the second wave occurring in
2010-11, when the children were 3 years of age. The third wave was then carried out in 2012-
13, following the children at 5 years of age (9001 children; 4612 males and 4389 females). A
wide range of information has been collected from families and children, combining household
interviews with school visits.
Face-to-face interviews with both mothers and fathers in each household of the study
child were conducted during visits to the household by a trained interviewer. Examples of
information obtained from these interviews with parents when the children were aged 5 relate
to the child’s home environment, parental education and employment status, as well as
activities the child engages in, including questions related to screen use. The two variables that
were recorded related to ‘Screen Time’ and ‘Screen Activity’. The question relating to screen
time asked: “How many hours does the child spend on screen time on an average weekday?”.
This question included television, DVDs, iPads, smartphones, computers, and gaming
consoles. For screen activity the question asked of parents was “What does the child mostly
engage in during screen time? Is s/he usually playing educational games, playing other (video)
games, watching movies/videos/other TV, or doing a mixture of all types of activities?”.
In addition to interviewing parents, measures of child cognitive development were also
completed by the child, including a measure of vocabulary (using the Naming Vocabulary’
sub-scale of the Early Years Battery of the British Ability Scales II, Elliott, Smith &
McCullough, 1997). Using these data from the GUI study allowed an investigation of the
amount and type of screen use young Irish children are engaged in, and also what impact screen
use has on vocabulary development (see Beatty & Egan, 2019, for additional information on
this study).
What impact does screen time and screen activity have on language development?
The results showed that most Irish 5-year-olds (55%) engage in 1 to 2 hours of daily screen
time, with 28.5% engaging in 2 to 3 hours of daily screen time, and 13.9% engaged in over 3
hours of screen time a day. Only 2.6% of 5-year-olds are not engaged in any screen time.
Parents reported that their children mostly engaged in mixed screen activities (56.4%) or
watched movies, videos, and other TV programmes (36.2%). Relatively few children engaged
in mostly video games (3%) or mostly educational games as their preferred screen activity
(1.6%).
These findings highlight that young Irish children display a wide range of screen time
(ranging from none to more than 3 hours per day) and engage in a variety of activities.
Interestingly, there was an association between the type of activity children engaged in and the
amount of time spent per day on screens. Children who mostly engaged in educational games
were significantly less likely to be on a screen for more than 3 hours a day in comparison to
those who mostly engaged in TV watching, or a mix of activities. More research is needed to
find out why that may be the case, but one possibility may relate to parental rules around screen
use (e.g., children who mostly play educational games during screen time may have parents
who have stricter rules about screen time and screen activities).
Examining the effect of screen time and screen activity on naming vocabulary scores
indicated a significant difference in scores depending of the type of screen activity. The results
show that, on average, children scored between 5 and 8 points lower when their screen time
was spent mostly on video games (Mean score = 104, Standard Deviation = 17.26), compared
to playing educational games (M = 109, SD = 18.46), watching movies, videos, or TV (M =
112, SD = 17.10) or engaging in a mix of activities (M = 112, SD = 17.17). This is in reference
to the overall mean score on the naming vocabulary task for this sample, which was 111 (SD =
17.30, Minimum score = 26, Maximum score = 170).
Of note in the findings also was that there was no significant difference in the
vocabulary scores of children whose main use was educational games, movies, TV or those
who engaged in a mix of activities. Additionally, the amount of time spent on screens did not
impact on vocabulary scores. There was no statistically significant difference in scores between
those who have no screen time (M = 110, SD =18.03), 1 to 2 hours (M = 112, SD = 16.93), 2
to 3 hours (M = 111, SD = 17.26) or more than 3 hours (M = 110, SD = 18.55) in terms of their
vocabulary.
These findings suggest that the type of screen activity is having a larger effect on
vocabulary scores than the amount of screen time. Additional statistical analyses looking at the
impact of the two factors together also support this conclusion. Furthermore, the type of screen
activity continued to have a significant impact on vocabulary scores, even after taking account
of other factors that might impact on language development, such as the family’s socio-
economic status (Hoff, 2003; Pace, Luo, Hirsh-Pasek, & Golinkoff, 2017), or whether the child
had siblings (Maynard, 2004).
The results show that, statistically, there is little difference in vocabulary scores of 5-
year-olds who do not use screens at all compared to those that do have screen time, even where
that screen time would seem excessive by some standards. Similarly, there is little difference
in vocabulary scores across different types of screen activities, with the exception of mostly
engaging in video games. It may be the case that video games contain less verbal content than
watching a cartoon, or may provide less opportunity for talk time with parents than other screen
activities. It could also be the case that those who engage mostly in video games may have
fewer rules in the home regarding screen use.
Conclusion
The findings briefly described in this article, and those of previous research, highlight the
importance of considering the impact of different aspects of screen use on development. This
study reports that there is a negative effect of video game use for vocabulary development in
Irish 5-year-olds. However, it is important to note as well that the negative effect of video game
use is small, and in this instance is only demonstrated for vocabulary development. The impact
of video game use may differ for other aspects of development, such as reasoning, attention,
or social skills. Future research should continue to explore the effect of various aspects of
screen use on child development, as it is important that policies and guidelines related to screen
use during early childhood are founded on a strong, research evidence base.
Acknowledgements
This research is supported by a Mary Immaculate College Assistantship awarded to Chloe
Beatty.
References
Aladé, F., Lauricella, A. R., Beaudoin-Ryan, L., & Wartella, E. (2016). Measuring with
Murray: Touchscreen technology and preschoolers' STEM learning. Computers in
Human Behavior, 62, 433-441.
Anderson, C. A., & Bushman, B. J. (2001). Effects of Violent Video Games on Aggressive
Behavior, Aggressive Cognition, Aggressive Affect, Physiological Arousal, and
Prosocial Behavior: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Scientific Literature.
Psychological Science, 12(5), 353359.
Anderson, D. R., & Pempek, T. A. (2005). Television and very young children. American
Behavioral Scientist, 48(5), 505-522.
Barr, R., Lauricella, A., Zack, E., & Calvert, S. L. (2010). Infant and early childhood
exposure to adult-directed and child-directed television programming: Relations with
cognitive skills at age four. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 56(1), 21-48.
Beatty, C. & Egan, S.M. (2019). The Effect of Screen Time and Screen Activity on Cognitive
Development in Early Childhood: Evidence from the Growing Up in Ireland Study.
Manuscript in preparation.
Christakis, D. A., Zimmerman, F. J., DiGiuseppe, D. L., & McCarty, C. A. (2004). Early
television exposure and subsequent attentional problems in children. Pediatrics,
113(4), 708-713.
Courage, M. L., & Setliff, A. E. (2009). Debating the impact of television and video material
on very young children: Attention, learning, and the developing brain. Child
Development Perspectives, 3(1), 72-78.
Egan, S.M. & Pope, J. (2019). From Research Evidence to Evidence Based Practice in Early
Childhood Settings. An Leanbh Og: The OMEP Ireland Journal of Early Childhood
Studies, 12 (Forthcoming).
Elliott, C. D., Smith, P., & McCulloch, K. (1997). British ability scales second edition (BAS
II): Technical manual. Windsor: NFER-Nelson.
Etchells, P. J., Gage, S. H., Rutherford, A. D., & Munafò, M. R. (2016). Prospective
investigation of video game use in children and subsequent conduct disorder and
depression using data from the Avon longitudinal study of parents and children. PloS
one, 11(1), e0147732.
Ferguson, C. J. (2015). Do angry birds make for angry children? A meta-analysis of video
game influences on children’s and adolescents’ aggression, mental health, prosocial
behavior, and academic performance. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(5),
646-666.
Growing Up in Ireland (2010). Infants and Their Families. Department of Children and
Youth Affairs. Retrieved from https://www.esri.ie/publications/growing-up-in-
ireland-the-infants-and-their-families
Hoff, E. (2003). Causes and consequences of SES-related differences in parent-to-child
speech. In M. H. Bornstein & R. H. Bradley (Eds.), Socioeconomic status, parenting,
and child development. Mahwaw, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hoyne, C. & Egan, S.M. (2019). Shared Book Reading in Early Childhood: A review of
Influential Factors and Developmental Benefits. An Leanbh Og: The OMEP Ireland
Journal of Early Childhood Studies, 12 (Forthcoming).
Kostyrka-Allchorne, K., Cooper, N. R., & Simpson, A. (2017). The relationship between
television exposure and children’s cognition and behaviour: A systematic review.
Developmental Review, 44, 19-58.
Krcmar, M., & Cingel, D. P. (2014). Parentchild joint reading in traditional and electronic
formats. Media Psychology, 17(3), 262-281.
Lauricella, A. R., Barr, R., & Calvert, S. L. (2014). Parentchild interactions during
traditional and computer storybook reading for children’s comprehension:
implications for electronic storybook design. International Journal of Child
Computer Interaction, 2(1), 17-25.
LaForge, C., Perron, M., Roy-Charland, A., Roy, E. & Carignan, I. (2018). Contributing to
Children’s Early Comprehension of Emotions: A Picture Book Approach. Canadian
Journal of Education, 41(1), 301-328.
Lavigne, H. J., Hanson, K. G., & Anderson, D. R. (2015). The influence of television
coviewing on parent language directed at toddlers. Journal of Applied Developmental
Psychology, 36, 1-10.
Linebarger, D. L., & Walker, D. (2005). Infants’ and toddlers’ television viewing and
language outcomes. American Behavioral Scientist, 48(5), 624-645.
Marsh, J., Plowman, L., Yamada-Rice, D., Bishop, J. C., Lahmar, J., Scott, F., ... & Thornhill,
S. (2015). Exploring play and creativity in pre-schoolers’ use of apps: Final project
report. Technology and Play. Retrieved from:
http://www.techandplay.org/reports/TAP_Final_Report.pdf.
Maynard, A. E. (2004). Sibling interactions. In U. P. Gielen & J. Roopnarine (Eds.),
Childhood and adolescence: Cross
cultural perspectives and applications. Advances
in applied developmental psychology. Westport, CT: Praeger.
McClure, E. R., Chentsova-Dutton, Y. E., Barr, R. F., Holochwost, S. J., & Parrott, W. G.
(2015). “Facetime doesn’t count”: Video chat as an exception to media restrictions for
infants and toddlers. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 6, 1-6.
Merchant, G. (2015). Keep taking the tablets: iPads, story apps and early literacy. Australian
Journal of Language and Literacy, 38(1), 3.
Murray, A., & Egan, S. M. (2014). Does reading to infants benefit their cognitive
development at 9-months-old? An investigation using a large birth cohort survey.
Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 30(3), 303-315.
Neumann, M. M. (2018). Using tablets and apps to enhance emergent literacy skills in young
children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 42, 239-246.
Obel, C., Henriksen, T. B., Dalsgaard, S., Linnet, K. M., Skajaa, E., Thomsen, P. H., &
Olsen, J. (2004). Does children's watching of television cause attention problems?
Retesting the hypothesis in a Danish cohort. Pediatrics, 114(5), 1372-1373.
Pace, A., Luo, R., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. M. (2017). Identifying pathways between
socioeconomic status and language development. Annual Review of Linguistics, 3,
285-308.
Przybylski, A. K., & Weinstein, N. (2017). A large-scale test of the goldilocks hypothesis:
quantifying the relations between digital-screen use and the mental well-being of
adolescents. Psychological Science, 28(2), 204-215.
Radesky, J. S., Schumacher, J., & Zuckerman, B. (2015). Mobile and interactive media use
by young children: the good, the bad, and the unknown. Pediatrics, 135(1), 1-3.
Rideout, V. J. (2011). Zero to eight: Children’s media use in America. San Francisco, CA:
Common Sense Media.
Rideout, V. J. (2013). Zero to eight: Children’s media use in America. New York, NY:
Common Sense Media.
Sharif, I., & Sargent, J. D. (2006). Association between television, movie, and video game
exposure and school performance. Pediatrics, 118(4), 1061-1070.
Zimmerman, F. J., Christakis, D. A., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2007). Associations between media
viewing and language development in children under age 2 years. The Journal of
Pediatrics, 151(4), 364-368.
... On the contrary, there has been some evidence that slow pace thoughtfully designed children's media may have some benefits for pre-schoolers (Pappas, 2020), promotes language learning (Roseberry, Hirsh-Pasek, & Golinkoff, 2014), and has a significant effect on vocabulary size and expressive language production (Linebarger & Walker, 2005). There have also been researchers who found no association between children's screen time and language, especially when the screen time involved child related content (Beatty & Egan, 2018;Ruangdaraganon et al., 2009), suggesting that content had more impact on children's development, including language development, than the amount of screen time. Coviewing with parents also reduces the negative impact of screen time as parents are likely to have interactions with their children about what they are watching, which in turn can promote language development (Beatty & Egan, 2018). ...
... There have also been researchers who found no association between children's screen time and language, especially when the screen time involved child related content (Beatty & Egan, 2018;Ruangdaraganon et al., 2009), suggesting that content had more impact on children's development, including language development, than the amount of screen time. Coviewing with parents also reduces the negative impact of screen time as parents are likely to have interactions with their children about what they are watching, which in turn can promote language development (Beatty & Egan, 2018). ...
Article
Full-text available
Screen time has been documented to have effects on many areas of child development, including language development. The aim of this study was to obtain information about Malaysian children’s reported screen time and their parents’ perception on how screen time affects their language skills. An online survey was completed by 340 Malaysian parents of children aged 3- to 5-years. A majority of parents (60%) started giving their children screen time before the age of 18 months. On average, 3- to 5-year-olds were reported to spend 2.64 hours of screen time a day. Most parents believed that screen time improved their children’s language skills but this did not affect the amount of screen time they provided their children as there was no significant relationship between children’s reported screen time and parent’s perception on how it affects language. Malaysian children were exposed to screens at an early age and their screen time exceeded the amount recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics. Findings from this study suggest the need to increase Malaysian parents’ awareness about screen time limits for their children and also about positive screen viewing practices. • IMPACT SUMMARYa. Prior State of Knowledge Summarize what is known about the topic. To date, no research has been conducted in Malaysia exploring the screen time of children aged 3 to 5 and their parents’ perception about how screen time affects children’s language skills. • b. Novel Contributions Summarize the primary contributions the findings make to the field. The findings contribute to knowledge about screen time patterns in Malaysia, a developing country, and how the findings are similar to that of most other countries. • c. Practical Implications Authors should explicitly state what the practical implications of their findings are, and whether those implications are primarily for practitioners, policymakers, or parents. For policymakers & practioners (e.g., speech-language pathologist): Findings suggest the need to provide Malaysian parents with information about screen time limits, the importance of joint media engagement, and ensuring that their children are watching appropriate content.
... They also reported that 16% of 3-year-olds had a TV, computer, or games console in their bedroom and 85% of families had rules about screen time. By 5 years of age, 42% of Irish children in the Growing Up in Ireland study were engaging in more than two hours of screen time per day on average (inclusive to computers and touchscreen devices), with 55% engaged in less than 2 hours (Beatty & Egan, 2018;Murray, McNamara, Williams, & Smyth, 2019). This screen time mostly involved a mix of all screen activities, as opposed to solely watching TV programmes, videos, or movies or playing games (Beatty & Egan, 2020). ...
... Furthermore, Beatty and Egan (2018) reported that in an Irish sample of 5-year-olds (drawn from the Growing Up in Ireland study) that screen activity, but not screen time, had an effect on language development. When comparing computer games, educational games, and TV watching, they found that computer games had more of a negative association with vocabulary development for these 5-year-olds. ...
Article
Full-text available
Much of the research on screen time to date has focused on TV watching and the amount of time spent on screens. However, due to the high level of variation in current screen activities in relation to features, parental scaffolding opportunities, portability, and interactivity (e.g., tv, smartphones, tablets) it is no longer possible to consider the singular effect of all screen types on the developing child. Recent research in the field suggests that the quality of the content, parental engagement and monitoring, and the inclusion of interactive elements are all factors that influence the effect screen use has on early development, in addition to the amount of time spent on the screen. This article discusses the prevalence of screen use in early childhood, as well as the quality of the research evidence base examining the role of screen use in various aspects of child psychological development. The article concludes by considering current definitions and guidelines for screen use in childhood.
... Previous research investigating the impact of screen time on cognitive development in early childhood has focused on a number of aspects of development such as attention, reading comprehension, and language (e.g., Zimmerman, Christakis and Meltzoff, 2007;Barr, Lauricella, Zack and Calvert, 2010;Pempek, Demers, Hanson, Kirkorian and Anderson, 2011;Beatty and Egan, 2018). Findings from these studies have been mixed. ...
... The majority of five-year-olds engaged in between one and two hours of daily screen time, and a mix of all activities (see Table 1), as also reported by Beatty and Egan (2018) and Murray, McNamara, Williams and Smyth (2019). Non-verbal reasoning scores in the fiveyear-olds ranged between a minimum score of 10 and a maximum score of 119 (Mean score = 86.59, ...
Article
Full-text available
With screen use becoming more prevalent at a younger age, it is important to research the possible impact screen use has on early cognitive development. The current study examines the screen use of 9001 5-year-olds and their reasoning abilities, using data from the Growing Up in Ireland study. Results show that both the amount of daily screen time, along with the type of screen activity children mostly engage in (video games, educational games, TV/video watching, or a mix of all of these activities), have an impact on 5-year-olds' reasoning ability. Children who mostly engaged in a mix of activities for under three hours a day scored higher on a reasoning ability task than those who engaged in more than three hours of screen time, or those who engaged in an individual screen activity (e.g., television watching) rather than a mix of activities. However, the results also show screen use plays a very minor role in the development of reasoning ability. Consequently, other factors (e.g., home learning environment, parental education levels) should also be investigated when examining the role of screen use in cognitive development. The implications of these findings may therefore be of interest to parent, educators and policy-makers.
... Previous research investigating the impact of screen time on cognitive development in early childhood has focused on a number of aspects of development such as attention, reading comprehension, and language (e.g., Zimmerman, Christakis and Meltzoff, 2007;Barr, Lauricella, Zack and Calvert, 2010;Pempek, Demers, Hanson, Kirkorian and Anderson, 2011;Beatty and Egan, 2018). Findings from these studies have been mixed. ...
... The majority of five-year-olds engaged in between one and two hours of daily screen time, and a mix of all activities (see Table 1), as also reported by Beatty and Egan (2018) and Murray, McNamara, Williams and Smyth (2019). Non-verbal reasoning scores in the five-year-olds ranged between a minimum score of 10 and a maximum score of 119 (Mean score = 86.59, ...
Article
Full-text available
Giving Our Children the Best Start in Life was a fully online qualitative consultation using Survey Monkey, developed and carried out by the Katherine Howard Foundation. The online consultation involved over 1000 parents, revealing policy-relevant insights into parent needs and priorities over the first three years of their child’s life, as well as their perceptions of the contexts, systems and services which can influence early child outcomes. The article also discusses the success of using a digital platforms as a means through which to seek the views of parents, a methodology that can be developed and expanded as a tool moving forward
... However, results are contradictory for the first year of life, since existing research showed relations between electronic media use and nonverbal and verbal communication in infants and preschoolers from 1 to 5 years old using parent reports (n< 140) (Beatty & Egan, 2018;Taylor, et al., 2018) and no effects with books in verbal communication (Karrass & Braungart-Rieker, 2005;Wasik et al., 2016). Also, results showed positive associations between electronic books and joint attention in behavioral approach (n< 70), but not with print books and vice versa (Munzer et al., 2019;Strouse & Ganea, 2017). ...
Article
Full-text available
Several researchers have found that media exposure through books or electronic media contribute to preschoolers’ development. However, research with behavioral measures and during the first years of life have not been carried out in Latin American contexts. The aim of the following research was to evaluate the relations between media exposure through electronic media and books with joint attention skills and temperament (i.e., effortful control, surgency and negative affect) during the first year of life. A free play session was carried out, where the number of mother-infant interaction behaviors were assessed. Findings state that only the amount and the frequency of the use of books at home between caregivers and infants were positively associated with the behaviors of joint attention and surgency. Conclusion denotes that books would probably be associated with more infant interactions and higher SES, mediating in the promotion of cognitive development from the first months of life.
... Although Foy and Mann (2003) reported that the time spent consuming reading-related media through the television, computer use, and videos positively correlated with certain literacy skills, the present study found no differences. It did, however, find that the media content and the type of programs children consumed influenced their literacy skills (Altun, 2019c;Beatty & Egan, 2018;Linebarger & Walker, 2005). These results may be specific to the Turkish context: Turkish children's reading experiences are derived mainly from printed materials, and their reading experience with computers is limited (Altun & Tantekin-Erden, 2015;Altun, 2017Altun, , 2021. ...
Article
Full-text available
Emergent literacy is an umbrella term that encompasses developmental precursor skills, knowledge, and attitudes related to reading and writing. Previous studies have focused on the cognitive aspects of reading, such as word recognition, phonological awareness, and comprehension. However, reading is also an activity that requires effort and involves motivation and attitudes. These affective dimensions are given little attention in the literature on children’s literacy development. To fill this gap, this study investigates preliterate preschoolers’ attitudes toward reading in relation to gender, maternal factors, and home literacy environment. The sample included 261 parents and their 5 year-old children. The data were collected using a preschool reading attitudes scale, a home literacy environment questionnaire, and a parent survey. The findings reveal that gender, time spent watching television, and computer use were unrelated to children’s reading attitudes. However, children’s home literacy environment, the number of books in their household, and maternal reading attitudes and reading habits were significantly related, accounting for 62% of the variance in children’s reading attitudes. These results suggest mothers are role models for children’s attitudes regarding direct literacy experiences and affective responses to reading. Investigating the contribution made by early home literacy experiences to reading attitudes and early literacy skills allows an understanding of how cognitive and motivational factors are involved in the learning-to-read process.
Article
În ciuda noutății, entuziasmului și speranței că tehnologia va revoluționa și educația, așa cum a revoluționat multe alte domenii (medicina, industriile), programele desfășurate în ultimii ani au arătat că tehnologia singură nu are puterea să schimbe în bine educația (Blackwell et al., 2014, para.4), ci oamenii pot face acest lucru, dacă sunt dispuși să învețe cum, de ce și când. Cu alte cuvinte, mai întâi au fost introduse dispozitivele și creată infrastructură, apoi administratorii și profesorii au început să învețe, cu sprijin în unele țări, fără sprijin în altele, cum să o folosească. Oare ar fi fost mai utilă o abordare inversă? Specializarea profesorilor și ulterior dotarea școlilor cu infrastructura necesară? Suntem în situația în care se găsesc uneori instituții din România (de exemplu, unele centre medicale veterinare, dar și de medicină umană) unde există aparatură însă nu și specialiști să le folosească. Date fiind observațiile și studiile realizate în mediul școlar, ne întrebăm oare cum ar funcționa dotarea grădinițelor cu tablete și alte dispozitive cu ecran? Ce face ca tehnologia digitală să poată fi cu adevărat utilă în educația timpurie? Care să fie motivația introducerii tehnologiilor digitale în educația timpurie? Această lucrare oferă repere psihologice și educaționale pentru utilizarea tehnologiilor digitale în instituțiile de învățământ preșcolar, precum și în contextul educației familiale.
Article
Despite the novelty and excitement of the promise that technology will revolutionize education, as it has revolutionized many other fields (medicine, industries), programs in recent years have shown that technology alone does not have the power to change education for the better (Blackwell et al., 2014, para.4). Still, people can do this, if they are willing to learn how, why and when. In other words, first, the devices were introduced and the infrastructure created, then administrators and teachers began to learn how to use it, with support in some countries, without support in others. Would a reverse approach have been more useful? For instance, specializing teachers and subsequently equipping schools with the necessary infrastructure? We are in a situation where there are sometimes early education institutions where there is equipment, but education managers and teachers do not have the full picture of how and when to use it, and what are the implications of this usage. Given observations and studies carried out in the school environment, we wonder how equipping kindergartens with tablets and other screen devices would work? What makes digital technology really useful in early childhood education? What should be the motivation for the introduction of digital technologies in early education? This paper provides psychological and educational benchmarks for the use of digital technologies in preschool educational institutions, as well as in the context of family education.
Chapter
Full-text available
Play in the home environment is important for cognitive and socio-emotional development in early childhood. Children’s home environments are made up of multiple play activities (e.g., toys, books, screen time, outdoor play) and are influenced by multiple factors (e.g., availability of resources, parenting behaviours, parental attitudes to play, socio-economic class, parents’ education). This chapter will describe the relevant literature and rationale that led to the Play and Learning in Early Years (PLEY) Study, an online survey of over 300 parents of children aged 6 or under, which measured play activities at home in early childhood and the factors that influence it. The findings of this broad survey shed light on various elements of play in the home environment for young children, such as the time spent in outdoor play, reading/storytime, playing with toys or games and on-screen time, for weekdays as well as weekends. The data collected in this survey also highlight the level of play resources for young children in the home environment such as the number of children’s books available, access to outdoor play equipment (e.g., bicycles, trampolines) and use of screen devices (e.g., television, tablet, smartphone, laptop). This research provides a timely snapshot of the play activities of young children today and discusses the importance of the home play environment. The findings from the PLEY Study are contextualised using a bioecological systems framework, which highlights the connection between the environment and child development.
Article
Full-text available
This paper highlights the wealth of quantitative research evidence available to inform practice during early childhood in Ireland. The first section of this paper discusses the importance of evidence based practice for any discipline, distinguishes it from developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood and considers an ecological systems perspective. The focus is on a number of research findings derived from the Growing Up in Ireland study illustrating how research can inform practice, alongside evidence from other international studies. The benefits and limitations to this approach are considered with the aim of informing practice and promoting an evidence based rationale.
Article
Full-text available
Reading is a basic cultural skill and important for success in life. The first aim of this article is to review research examining the factors that support early shared reading experiences and the developmental benefits of this activity in early childhood, drawing on international research in the first two sections of this paper. While international research provides a rich source of information on early shared reading experiences, there are few studies in Ireland that investigate this practice in infants and young children prior to starting primary school. Therefore, the second aim of this article is to draw together relevant findings from a number of recent Irish studies, in order to build a picture of shared reading practices nationally. Drawing together these findings in one article may provide a useful resource for researchers and policy makers in Ireland. The third and final aim of this article is to consider the implications of the findings for early reading supports for families in Ireland, in the context of national policies and ecological systems theory (Bronfenbrenner, 1979). Volume 12, An Leanbh Og, OMEP Ireland Journal of Early Childhood Studies
Article
Full-text available
Previous studies have suggested that children's emotion comprehension begins to develop in the early stages of childhood and has been linked to prosocial behaviours, displays of empathy, and better interpersonal relationships, to name a few. However, children's levels of emotion comprehension do not develop at the same rhythm, due to both environmental and biological factors. There are a few interventions that can help children in their development of emotion understanding, but these interventions are not readily accessible (e.g., due to cost, availability, duration). For example, the School Matters in Lifeskills Education Program (SMILE) is a theoretically based program aimed at improving children's emotion comprehension. Unfortunately, since, for instance, it requires rigorous training to be administered, it is not accessible to all. To address some of the issues with previous programs, the current study examined the use of shared book reading and the effectiveness of picture books created on current theories and models of children's emotion comprehension. Eighteen preschoolers were divided into an experimental and a control group. Over the course of multiple exposures to the experimental treatment, results revealed a significant gain for the experimental group compared to the control group. These results are promising by showing that a simple shared book reading approach can contribute to the development of emotion comprehension without requiring special training or expertise. Résumé Les travaux de recherche ont mis en évidence que la compréhension que les enfants ont des émotions commence à se développer tôt durant l'enfance. Ce type de compréhen-sion est en retour associé à davantage de comportements prosociaux, une plus grand empathie et de meilleures relations interpersonnelles en général. Cependant, en raison de facteurs biologiques et environnementaux, la compréhension des différentes com-posantes de l'émotion émerge graduellement au cours de l'enfance; certaines compo-santes n'étant maîtrisées que plus tardivement. Plusieurs interventions sont actuellement Canadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l'éducation 41:1 (2018) www.cje-rce.ca Children's Early Comprehension of Emotions 303 disponibles afin de promouvoir la compréhension des émotions, mais celles-ci ne sont souvent pas facilement accessibles (en raison des coûts, de la formation nécessaire ou de la durée de l'intervention). Par exemple, le « School Matters in Lifeskills Education Program (SMILE) » est un programme destiné à favoriser le développement de la compré-hension des émotions chez les enfants, mais celui-ci nécessite une formation importante et implique une intervention qui s'étend sur plusieurs mois. Il est donc difficilement accessible à une grande partie de la population. Afin de pallier à ces limites, l'objectif de la présente étude est d'utiliser l'approche de la lecture conjointe afin de promouvoir la compréhension des émotions chez les enfants et tester l'efficacité de livres créés spécifi-quement sur la base de théories et données scientifiques sur la compréhension des émo-tions. Dix-huit enfants d'âge préscolaire ont été divisés en deux groupes (expérimental et contrôle). Après avoir été exposés à de multiples reprises aux livres spécialisés qui ont été créés, seuls les enfants du groupe expérimental ont montré des gains significatifs dans leur compréhension des émotions. Les résultats de cette études suggèrent qu'il est possible d'utiliser la lecture conjointe comme moyen d'améliorer la compréhension des émotions chez les enfants sans que cela n'implique une formation spéciale ou une expertise spécifique.
Article
Full-text available
Children from low-income backgrounds consistently perform below their more advantaged peers on standardized measures of language ability, setting long-term trajectories that translate into gaps in academic achievement. Our primary goals in this review are to describe how and why this is so, in order to focus attention on ways to enrich early language experiences across socioeconomic strata. We first review the literature on the relation between socioeconomic status (SES) and language ability across domains in early childhood. We then identify three potential pathways by which SES might influence language development?child characteristics, parent?child interaction, and availability of learning resources?recognizing the complicated interaction between the child?s own language learning skill and his/her environmental support. Finally, we review interventions that target these three pathways with an eye toward best practice. Future research should focus on the diversity of contexts in which children acquire language and adopt methods of language measurement that are sensitive to cultural variation. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Linguistics Volume 3 is January 14, 2017. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.
Article
Full-text available
There is increasing public and scientific concern regarding the long-term behavioural effects of video game use in children, but currently little consensus as to the nature of any such relationships. We investigated the relationship between video game use in children, degree of violence in games, and measures of depression and a 6-level banded measure of conduct disorder. Data from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children were used. A 3-level measure of game use at age 8/9 years was developed, taking into account degree of violence based on game genre. Associations with conduct disorder and depression, measured at age 15, were investigated using ordinal logistic regression, adjusted for a number of potential confounders. Shoot-em-up games were associated with conduct disorder bands, and with a binary measure of conduct disorder, although the strength of evidence for these associations was weak. A sensitivity analysis comparing those who play competitive games to those who play shoot-em-ups found weak evidence supporting the hypothesis that it is violence rather than competitiveness that is associated with conduct disorder. However this analysis was underpowered, and we cannot rule out the possibility that increasing levels of competition in games may be just as likely to account for the observed associations as violent content. Overall game exposure as indicated by number of games in a household was not related to conduct disorder, nor was any association found between shoot-em-up video game use and depression.
Article
Touch screen tablets (e.g., iPads) are being increasingly used by young children due to their stimulating multimodal features and intuitive touch-based interface. However, little is known about the effects of tablets and apps on the development of emergent literacy skills. This pre-post-test randomised controlled study explored the effects of using literacy apps on emergent literacy skills in English speaking children aged 2–5 years (N = 48). There were 24 children in the iPad group and 24 children in the waitlist control group. The 9-week (30 min/week) iPad literacy program focussed on three new alphabet letters each week using three apps (letter matching, letter tracing, and drawing). Following the program, children in the iPad group showed significantly higher letter name and sound knowledge, print concepts and name writing skills than children in the control group. No significant group differences were found for letter writing skills or numeral knowledge. The findings showed that tablets can positively support letter name and sound learning and aspects of emergent writing development. How teachers can best utilise these digital tools in early childhood classrooms to support emergent literacy requires further investigation.
Article
The aim of this article is to systematically review the literature studying the association between television viewing and children’s executive function, academic performance, attention, language and play. Using keywords: television, children, infants, attention, language, education and cognition, five online databases were searched. Seventy-six studies that met all the inclusion criteria were reviewed. The findings suggest the relationship between television viewing and children’s development is complex. First, the likely effects of television may depend on children’s individual characteristics, family and social context. Second, the features of television, such as content and editing pace, and the type of exposure (foreground or background) may affect outcomes. Specifically, watching high-quality educational content during preschool years improves children’s basic academic skills and predicts subsequent positive academic performance. Conversely, television viewing in infancy is disruptive to play; it reduces the quality and quantity of child-parent interactions and is associated with inattentive/hyperactive behaviours, lower executive functions, and language delay, at least in the short-term. It remains unclear whether these interactions between television and cognition are long lasting. Future research should focus on the systematic investigation of the pathways that link particular components of television and the type of exposure with individual and contextual factors, to investigate their potential unique and combined effects on development. Researchers must also address the challenge of investigating the diverse and rapidly changing technologies to which the current generation of children are exposed.
Article
The American Academy of Pediatrics has historically discouraged media exposure for children under two due to the absence of evidence supporting its benefits and the potential for negative effects (AAP, 2011); however, the AAP has begun to recognize that all screen time may not be equal (Brown, Shifrin, & Hill, 2015). For example, many young children today are geographically separated from family members, and video chat in particular may allow them to develop and maintain relationships with remote relatives (Ballagas, Kaye, Ames, Go, & Raffle, 2009). Do babies and toddlers use this technology, or have their parents discouraged its use because it is a form of media exposure? An online media usage survey was distributed to 183 parents of children between 6 and 24 months in the D.C. metro area. There were high levels of video chat usage reported across all children, regardless of whether they were exposed to high or low levels of other types of media. Furthermore, some parents explicitly reported viewing video chat as an exception to otherwise restrictive media rules. The changing landscape of traditional and non-traditional media sources and the implications of increased access to video chat technology for family communication are discussed.
Article
The rapid proliferation of story and game apps aimed at the early years has contributed to the iPad’s visibility as a device for family entertainment and informal education. It is often claimed that iPads and other touch screen devices place sophisticated media in the hands of users. Moreover some have argued that the iPad is particularly appealing for young children because of its weight, portability and intuitive touch-screen interface. This paper critically appraises these claims by a close analysis of young children (14-22 months) in two story-app sharing interactions with an adult. The data is drawn from a wider study based in early years settings in the North of England. An analytical focus based on the material affordances of the iPad and apps is developed and it is suggested that this is a fruitful approach to adopt. Not only does this approach highlight important issues for practitioners, but it also suggests that the interface, and the story-apps used, may not be quite as intuitive as has been suggested. The data also suggest that broader socio-cultural issues may emerge from this sort of data.