Conference PaperPDF Available

Extracting Trusted Pixels from Historical Cropland Data Layer Using Crop Rotation Patterns: A Case Study in Nebraska, USA

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

It is still a challenge to generate the timely crop cover map at large geographic area due to the lack of reliable ground truths at early growing season. This paper introduces an efficient method to extract “trusted pixels” from the historical Cropland Data Layer (CDL) data using crop rotation patterns, which can be used to replace the actual ground truth in the crop mapping and other agricultural applications. A case study in the Nebraska state of USA is demonstrated. The common crop rotation patterns of four major crop types, corn, soybeans, winter wheat, and alfalfa, are compared and analyzed. The experiment results show a considerable number of pixels in CDL following the certain crop sequence during the past decade. Each observed crop type has at least one reliable crop rotation pattern. Based on the reliable crop rotation patterns, a great proportion of pixels can be correctly mapped a year ahead of the release of current-year CDL product. These trusted pixels can be potentially used to label training samples for crop type classification at early growing season.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Extracting Trusted Pixels from Historical Cropland
Data Layer Using Crop Rotation Patterns: A Case
Study in Nebraska, USA
Chen Zhang†‡ , Liping Di∗† , Li Lin , Liying Guo
Center for Spatial Information Science and Systems, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA
Department of Geography and Geoinformation Sciences, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA
Email: {czhang11, ldi*, llin2, lguo2}@gmu.edu
Abstract—It is still a challenge to generate the timely crop
cover map at large geographic area due to the lack of reliable
ground truths at early growing season. This paper introduces an
efficient method to extract “trusted pixels” from the historical
Cropland Data Layer (CDL) data using crop rotation patterns,
which can be used to replace the actual ground truth in the crop
mapping and other agricultural applications. A case study in
the Nebraska state of USA is demonstrated. The common crop
rotation patterns of four major crop types, corn, soybeans, winter
wheat, and alfalfa, are compared and analyzed. The experiment
results show a considerable number of pixels in CDL following
the certain crop sequence during the past decade. Each observed
crop type has at least one reliable crop rotation pattern. Based on
the reliable crop rotation patterns, a great proportion of pixels
can be correctly mapped a year ahead of the release of current-
year CDL product. These trusted pixels can be potentially used
to label training samples for crop type classification at early
growing season.
Index Terms—Crop rotation, Crop Mapping, Land use classi-
fication, Cropland Data Layer
I. INTRODUCTION
Ground truth is a crucial component of agricultural land
use classification and modeling. An accurate crop cover map
is commonly produced based on the reliable ground truth
information. For example, Cropland Data Layer (CDL) is an
annual product providing a massive amount of field-level (30-
meter spatial resolution) land use information with overall 95%
accuracy for the entire Contiguous United States (CONUS)
[1], which has been used in many studies such as LULC
change [2], flood mapping [3]–[5], national-scale cultivated
area estimation [6], and crop time series modeling [7]. The
procedure of CDL is based on a large number of reliable
ground truths and the surveys from the farm agency. However,
even though the internal use may be as early as mid to
late growing season, the current-year CDL product is usually
released for public use in the early of following year. A
common issue for the in-season crop mapping is the lack of
ground truth at early growing season. Thus an efficient way to
gather ground truth information for the in-season agricultural
applications is needed.
As a common agricultural practice, crop rotation has been
widely used around the world since thousand years ago.
corresponding author
The long-term crop rotation can affect crop yield as well
as soil quality, such as fertility and soil physical/chemical
properties [8]–[11]. Meanwhile, crop rotation information was
used to support crop mapping. In [12], an approach for remote
sensing-based regional crop rotation mapping was proposed.
In [13], a Markov-based model of crop rotation was presented
which is able to predict the early crop map without the actual
remote sensing imagery. CropRota, a crop rotation modeling
framework, was implemented to support agricultural land use
assessment and management [14]. Based on the information
of cropping sequence, we may find some reliable crop rotation
patterns from the historical CDL time series. Then using these
patterns to predict the crop type of cropland that follows the
regular planting cycles. Once the latest CDL product becomes
available, a map for the “trusted pixels” of CDL can be created
even before the beginning of a growing season. These pixels
can be used to make up the lack of ground truth at early
growing season.
This study introduces an innovative method to extract
trusted pixels from the historical CDL data based on crop
rotation. Several common crop rotation patterns of major
crop types in the Nebraska state of USA are investigated
and evaluated. The accuracy and amount of trusted pixels
for each crop rotation pattern is compared and analyzed.
Section II introduces the data, study area, and method of
trusted pixel extraction. Section III assesses the common crop
rotation patterns in the study area and illustrates the map of
trusted pixels. Section IV discusses the experiment results.
Conclusions and future works are given in the section V.
II. ME TH OD S
A. Study Area
This paper demonstrates a case study in Nebraska, a mid-
western state in the United States which lies in the western
part of the Corn Belt region. It is one of the top agriculture
production state in the United States with agricultural land of
45.2 million acres, which takes 91% of the state’s total land
area. The crop cover map and the land use information of
the study area in 2017 are shown in Figure 1. The statistics
show that corn and soybean are two dominant crop types in
the Nebraska state. Besides, winter wheat and alfalfa account
for 2% of total land area each. Other crop types, such as
Preprint submitted to 8th International Conference on Agro-Geoinformatics (July 2019)
TABLE I
EXA MPL ES O F CROP ROTATIO N PATTER NS F OR COR N
Cycle Pattern 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
1-year A C C C C C C C C C C C C Corn
2-year A-B C NC C NC C NC C NC C NC C NC Corn
3-year A-B-B C NC NC C NC NC C NC NC C NC NC Corn
A-A-B C C NC C C NC C C NC C C NC Corn
A-B-A C NC C C NC C C NC C C NC C Corn
sorghum, dry beans, millet, and oats, account for a very small
proportion of all croplands. In this paper, we will focus on the
four dominant crop types (corn, soybean, winter wheat, and
alfalfa) in Nebraska.
Fig. 1. Statistics of major agricultural land use classes of Nebraska, USA, in
2017 (data from USDA NASS)
B. Data
CDL is the major source used in this study. It is the annual
product that covers the entire CONUS at 30-meter spatial
resolution from 2008 to present and some states from 1997
to 2007. In this study, we adopt the 16 years of CDL data
(2002-2017) for the study area. Figure 2 shows the map of
2017 CDL data for Nebraska state.
Fig. 2. The 2017 Cropland Data Layer of Nebraska, USA
C. Trusted Pixel Extraction
Crop rotation is the practice of growing a sequence of
different types of crops on the same cropland. Based on the
crop rotation patterns, the crop type of the subsequent year can
be predicted. Table I summarizes five common crop rotation
patterns and demonstrates how to predict the crop type from
the historical crop rotation information. It is marked with “C”
if the crop type of the pixel for the corresponding year is corn,
or “NC” if it is non-corn.
The “trusted pixels” refers pixels that consistently following
some certain crop rotation patterns in the historical CDL data.
Technically, the crop type in the subsequent growing season
is predicted by maximizing a priori probability based on the
historical crop rotation information. In this paper, the accuracy
and amount of pixels for four major crop types in Nebraska
(corn, soybean, winter wheat, and alfalfa), which are derived
from each crop rotation pattern, are assessed and compared.
According to the planting cycle, the five crop rotation
patterns described in the table can be divided into three
types: monocropping (1-year) pattern, alternate cropping (2-
year) pattern, and three-year planting cycle crop rotation
pattern. Specifically, the monocropping refers to the practice
of continuously growing a single crop on the same land unit.
The alternate cropping follows the two-year planting cycle that
growing a specific crop type on the same land every other year.
Similar with the alternate cropping, the three-year planting
cycle crop rotation is the practice of continuously growing the
specific crop type once (or twice) every three years.
To assess the reliability of the crop rotation pattern, a new
metric, Trusted Pixel Accuracy (TPA), is developed. TPA
measures the agreement of trusted pixels with the original
CDL pixels, which can be expressed as:
T rustedP ixelAccur acy =
GoodT rustedP ixel
T rustedP ixel (1)
where the “Good Trusted Pixel” is the amount of correctly
predicted trusted CDL pixels and the “Trusted Pixel” is the
amount of total trusted pixels. The value of TPA is ranging
from 0 to 1.
III. EXP ER IM EN TS
A. Assessment of Crop Rotation Patterns
This section presents a group of experiments to assess
common crop rotation patterns in Nebraska. The procedure of
assessment includes the following steps: (1) extracting pixels
that follow the specific crop rotation pattern from the historical
CDL data; (2) calculating the TPA and amount of the pixels;
(3) analyzing the impact of the change of the historical CDL
record on the result; and (4) determining the reliable crop
rotation patterns with high TPA.
(a) Corn (b) Soybeans (c) Winter Wheat (d) Alfalfa
Fig. 3. Change of trusted pixel accuracy and amount for the monocropping pattern
(a) Corn (b) Soybeans (c) Winter Wheat (d) Alfalfa
Fig. 4. Change of trusted pixel accuracy and amount for the alternate cropping pattern
1) Monocropping Pattern: Monocropping pattern extracts
pixels that have the constant crop type in the past few years.
Figure 3 presents the change of TPA and amount of pixels
derived from the monocropping pattern. The vertical axis of
each graph represents the TPA (right) and pixel amount (left).
The horizontal axis of each graph represents the length of
the referenced historical CDL data. For each crop type, we
compared the result of 2015 to 2017 using the moving window
with length from 1-year to 12-year. It can be observed from
the result that the change of corn is regular. With the increase
of CDL history, the corn’s TPA keeps going up. The result of
other crop types is not as satisfactory as corn. Some croplands
continuously growing soybean and winter wheat, yet many of
them will be replaced by other crop types at any time. The
result of alfalfa is unique. When using the 2-year historical
CDL data as reference, the alfalfa’s TPA reaches over 80%,
which is higher than the result based on the longer CDL
record. This result means a lot of croplands in Nebraska state
growing alfalfa for three consecutive years.
2) Alternate Cropping Pattern: Alternate cropping is the
most widely used crop rotation pattern in not only Nebraska
state but many other states in the Corn Belt region of mid-
western United States. Take corn as an example, if it is
constantly growing in the planting cycle of “corn, non-corn”,
we regard these pixels as the trusted pixel that following the
alternate cropping pattern. Figure 4 shows the change of the
TPA and amount of the trusted pixels that derived from the
alternate cropping pattern. For each crop type, we compared
the result of 2015 to 2017 using the moving window with
length from 2-year to 12-year. We can find out a great number
of croplands are following the alternate cropping pattern. After
two planting cycles (4 years), the TPA of corn and soybean
can achieve over 90% and keep going up with the increase
of the moving window of historical CDL record. After three
planting cycles (6 years), the trusted pixel of winter wheat
can reach over 80% agreement with the original CDL data.
Alfalfa, however, does not follow the alternate cropping pattern
since most alfalfa pixels are following the 3-consecutive-year
monocropping pattern.
3) Three-year Planting Cycle Crop Rotation Pattern: In
a three-year planting cycle, a certain crop could be grown
once or twice every three years. These patterns are denoted as
ABB”, “ABB”, and “ABA”, where “A” represents the crop
of interest (e.g. corn), “B” represents the crop other than the
crop of interest (e.g. non-corn). Figure 5 shows the change
of TPA and amount of trusted pixels extracted by the “ABB”
crop rotation pattern. We compared the result of each crop
type from 2015 to 2017 using the moving window with length
from 3-year to 12-year. The result shows a certain amount
of corn, soybean, and winter wheat pixels follow the “ABB”
pattern. After three planting cycles (9 years), corn and soybean
can achieve the TPA of over 80%. The TPA of winter wheat
is a little bit lower but keeps going up with the increase
of referenced CDL data. Alfalfa does not follow the “ABB”
pattern.
The results of the “AAB” pattern (Figure 6) indicate a
certain amount of corn pixels consistently follow the “AAB”
pattern. After three planting cycles (9 years), a small number
of soybean pixels achieve 80% of TPA. Winter wheat and
alfalfa do not follow “ABA” pattern.
The results of the “ABA” pattern (Figure 7) suggest some
corn pixels continuously follow the “ABA” pattern, which can
reach TPA of 80% after three planting cycles (9 years). A
few alfalfa pixels follow this pattern as well, but the result
varies between years. Soybean and winter wheat do not follow
ABA” pattern.
(a) Corn (b) Soybeans (c) Winter Wheat (d) Alfalfa
Fig. 5. Change of trusted pixel accuracy and amount for the “ABB” crop rotation pattern.
(a) Corn (b) Soybeans (c) Winter Wheat (d) Alfalfa
Fig. 6. Change of trusted pixel accuracy and amount for the “AAB” crop rotation pattern.
(a) Corn (b) Soybeans (c) Winter Wheat (d) Alfalfa
Fig. 7. Change of trusted pixel accuracy and amount for the “ABA” crop rotation pattern.
B. Mapping Trusted Pixels
Based on the above analysis, we can observe that each crop
type has been following one or more reliable crop rotation
patterns in Nebraska. In this study, a crop rotation pattern
will be regarded as the “reliable crop rotation pattern” if its
TPA is higher than 80%. Table II summarizes the minimum
planting cycle that required for each crop rotation pattern to
reach high TPA, where “C”, “NC”, “A”, “S”, “NS”, “W”,
and “NW” represent “corn”, “non-corn”, “alfalfa”, “soybean”,
“non-soybean”, “winter wheat”, and “non-winter wheat”, re-
spectively. The percentage of TPA and Proportion in CDL is
the mean value of three target years (2015-2017).
Once the latest CDL data is released to public, the current-
year trusted pixel can be created based on these reliable
crop rotation patterns without any current-year ground truth
information. Figure 8 show the 2018 trusted pixel map of
Nebraska derived by February 2018 using the CDL data from
2009 to 2017.
IV. DISCUSSION
It can be seen from the experiment result in Section
III-A that each crop type follows one or more crop rotation
patterns. The total amount of trusted pixels for each crop
rotation pattern keeps going down with the increase of the
referenced historical CDL record. This change is caused by
the following reasons: (1) many cropland units broke the
common crop rotation patterns at some stage of the historical
agricultural practice; (2) the pixel information of some regions
is inaccurate or missing in the historical CDL data; (3) the
cropland follows some other crop rotation patterns which are
not covered in this study.
Technically, “AAB” pattern and “ABA” pattern have the
same planting cycle (twice in three years), except for 1-
year time lag. However, the experiment result shows the
TPA of “AAB” crop rotation pattern is higher than “ABA”
crop rotation pattern. This difference could be explained by
the experiment results of monocropping pattern and alternate
cropping pattern. Take corn for instance, it can be found from
the first column in Figure 3 that only 40% of corn pixels
do not change their crop type in the next year. On the other
hand, the first column in Figure 4 indicates that over 80% of
corn pixels follow the alternate cropping pattern and change
the crop type after one alternate cropping planting cycle. It
can be concluded from the historical CDL data that the crop
type of most pixels in Nebraska is more likely to be changed
in the following growing season. In the long term, “ABA”
TABLE II
SUMMARY OF RELIABLE CROP ROTATIO N PATTER NS IN NEBRASKA, U SA
Planting Cycle Historical Crop Rotation Record Subsequent Crop TPA Proportion in CDL
1-year C-C-C-C-C-C Corn 83.09% 11.08%
A-A Alfalfa 82.94% 54.85%
2-year C-NC Corn 82.91% 46.80%
S-NS-S-NS Soybean 87.02% 46.55%
W-NW-W-NW-W-NW Winter Wheat 80.53% 17.90%
3-year C-NC-NC-C-NC-NC-C-NC-NC Corn 88.27% 0.75%
C-C-NC Corn 83.86% 14.04%
Fig. 8. The 2018 trusted pixel map of Nebraska, USA (produced by February 2018)
pattern and “AAB” pattern are equivalent with each other. In
the short term, the subsequent growing crop of the “ABA”
pattern follows the crop type of “A”, which is same as the
previous year. However, most land units follow the alternate
cropping pattern and keep changing the crop type year after
year, which can explain the accuracy difference between crop
rotation pattern of “AAB” and crop rotation pattern of “ABA”.
From the experiment result in Section III-B, we can see a
huge volume of trusted pixels can be automatically extracted
from the historical CDL data using reliable crop rotation
patterns. The TPA can be further improved by extracting
trusted pixels from the long-term reference data. As the trade-
off, the proportion of the trusted pixel will go down while
the increasing of the TPA. For major crop types (corn and
soybean) in the Nebraska state, the TPA of all reliable crop
rotation patterns would be stabilized at 90%-95% based on the
historical CDL record of 10-years or longer.
V. CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE WO RK S
This paper presented an efficient method to extract trusted
pixels from the historical CDL data using crop rotation
patterns. Several common crop rotation patterns, including
monocropping, alternate cropping, and 3-year panting cycle
crop rotation, were investigated. We found seven reliable crop
rotation patterns of four major crop types in the Nebraska state
of USA. The trusted pixels derived by the reliable crop rotation
patterns can reach 90%-95% agreement with the CDL data,
which can be potentially used to replace the actual ground truth
in the crop mapping and other agricultural applications at early
growing season. In the future, we will investigate more crop
rotation patterns for more diverse crop types over the entire
CONUS. Moreover, the feasibility of in-season crop mapping
using the trusted pixels will be explored.
ACK NOW LE DG EM EN T
This study is supported by a grant from U.S. National
Science Foundation (grant#: CNS-1739705, PI: Dr. Liping Di).
REFERENCES
[1] C. Boryan, Z. Yang, R. Mueller, and M. Craig, “Monitoring US agricul-
ture: The US Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics
Service, Cropland Data Layer Program,” Geocarto International, vol. 26,
no. 5, pp. 341–358, 2011.
[2] T. J. Lark, R. M. Mueller, D. M. Johnson, and H. K. Gibbs, “Mea-
suring land-use and land-cover change using the U.S. department of
agriculture’s cropland data layer: Cautions and recommendations,In-
ternational Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation,
vol. 62, pp. 224–235, Oct. 2017.
[3] L. Lin, L. Di, E. G. Yu, L. Kang, R. Shrestha, M. S. Rahman, J. Tang,
M. Deng, Z. Sun, C. Zhang, and L. Hu, “A review of remote sensing
in flood assessment,” in 2016 5th International Conference on Agro-
Geoinformatics, 2016.
[4] L. Lin, L. Di, J. Tang, E. Yu, C. Zhang, M. S. Rahman, R. Shrestha, and
L. Kang, “Improvement and Validation of NASA/MODIS NRT Global
Flood Mapping,” Remote Sensing, vol. 11, no. 2, p. 205, Jan. 2019.
[5] R. Shrestha, L. Di, E. G. Yu, L. Kang, Y. Shao, and Y. Bai, “Regression
model to estimate flood impact on corn yield using MODIS NDVI and
USDA cropland data layer,Journal of Integrative Agriculture, vol. 16,
no. 2, pp. 398–407, Feb. 2017.
[6] L. King, B. Adusei, S. V. Stehman, P. V. Potapov, X.-P. Song, A. Krylov,
C. Di Bella, T. R. Loveland, D. M. Johnson, and M. C. Hansen, “A
multi-resolution approach to national-scale cultivated area estimation of
soybean,” Remote Sensing of Environment, vol. 195, pp. 13–29, Jun.
2017.
[7] D. P. Roy and L. Yan, “Robust Landsat-based crop time series mod-
elling,” Remote Sensing of Environment, Jul. 2018.
[8] J. H. Edwards, D. L. Thurlow, and J. T. Eason, “Influence of Tillage
and Crop Rotation on Yields of Corn, Soybean, and Wheat,Agronomy
Journal, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 76–80, Jan. 1988.
[9] H. H. Janzen, C. A. Campbell, S. A. Brandt, G. P. Lafond, and
L. Townley-Smith, “Light-Fraction Organic Matter in Soils from Long-
Term Crop Rotations,Soil Science Society of America Journal, vol. 56,
no. 6, pp. 1799–1806, Nov. 1992.
[10] D. L. Karlen, E. G. Hurley, S. S. Andrews, C. A. Cambardella, D. W.
Meek, M. D. Duffy, and A. P. Mallarino, “Crop Rotation Effects on Soil
Quality at Three Northern Corn/Soybean Belt Locations,” Agronomy
Journal, vol. 98, no. 3, pp. 484–495, May 2006.
[11] L. L. Van Eerd, K. A. Congreves, A. Hayes, A. Verhallen, and D. C.
Hooker, “Long-term tillage and crop rotation effects on soil quality,
organic carbon, and total nitrogen,” Canadian Journal of Soil Science,
vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 303–315, May 2014.
[12] G. Waldhoff, U. Lussem, and G. Bareth, “Multi-Data Approach for
remote sensing-based regional crop rotation mapping: A case study for
the Rur catchment, Germany,International Journal of Applied Earth
Observation and Geoinformation, vol. 61, pp. 55–69, Sep. 2017.
[13] J. Osman, J. Inglada, and J.-F. Dejoux, “Assessment of a Markov
logic model of crop rotations for early crop mapping,” Computers and
Electronics in Agriculture, vol. 113, pp. 234–243, Apr. 2015.
[14] M. Sch¨
onhart, E. Schmid, and U. A. Schneider, “CropRota – A crop
rotation model to support integrated land use assessments,” European
Journal of Agronomy, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 263–277, May 2011.
... The CDL product is a geo-referenced, crop-specific, land cover map in a raster-format [8]. By entering a few criteria such as the year and AOI (depending on region, state, ASD, and county) [5,7,12,39], it is possible to download the ground truth data from CDL. GML, ESRI shape files, and.TIFF files are the three formats for the output data. ...
Article
Full-text available
With the growing popularity of deep learning, semantic segmentation using convolutional neural networks (CNNs) has proven the state of the art in the pixel-level classification of the remote sensed multi-temporal images captured by satellites such as Sentinel-1A, Sentinel-1B, Sentinel-2, and Landsat-8. Among these, the temporal Sentinel-1B data has widely been used for crop mapping. This research is entirely focused on crop classification based on Sentinel-1B synthetic aperture radar imagery. We have implemented seven popular CNN-based deep learning models and their variations for the segmentation and classification of the pre-processed Sentinel-1B SAR images. Further, we proposed an approach by collaborating the UNet and SEResNext50 as the backbone along with the custom loss function (a hybrid of dice loss and focal loss) and evaluated its performance qualitatively and quantitatively using various metrics. It is observed that the proposed approach is able to achieve an average IoU of 0.6465, average precision of 0.7371, average recall of 0.7191, and average F1-score of 0.7352. Based on the per-pixel confusion matrix the proposed approach achieves an overall accuracy of 98.69% and a kappa coefficient of 0.87. Further, the applicability in the context of Indian agriculture, as well as the current assistance provided by the Mahalanobis National Crop Forecast Centre as part of the Forecasting Agricultural output using Space, Agrometeorology, and Land-based observations programme has been discussed. We have also suggested a few proposals that can be considered by the Ministry of Agricultural and Farmer Welfare, India for the development of the application/platform to provide the ground labels/reference in formats such as GeoTiff or shapefile.
... After having wall-to-wall rice area maps for three consecutive years, it will be possible to produce rice area maps with very limited field data points. The algorithm uses trusted pixels to identify pixels whose current-year crop type can be predicted with high confidence from annual crop map series (Zhang, Di, Lin, & Guo, 2019;Zhang et al., 2021). The method can significantly reduce and even eliminate the field data requirement for model training. ...
Article
Mapping nationwide in-season crop-type data is a significant and challenging task in agriculture remote sensing. The existing data product for U.S. crop-type planting, such as the Cropland Data Layer (CDL), falls short in facilitating near-real-time applications. This paper designed a workflow aimed at automating the generation of in-season CDL-like products for the U.S. We methodically extracted trusted pixels as land cover labels from historical CDL datasets, employing Sentinel-2, Landsat 8, and Landsat-9 as sources for spectrum data, using the random forest classifier to conduct nationwide crop-type classifications. These classifications were integrated into the In-Season Crop Data Layer (ICDL) covering the entire Conterminous United States (CONUS). This approach facilitated the efficient generation of ICDLs for May, June, and July 2022, achieving satisfactory accuracy in July. Compared to Nebraska and Iowa ground truth data, ICDL achieved F1 scores of (0.911, 0.845) for corn and (0.959, 0.969) for soybean. Furthermore, ICDL’s regional acreage estimates for major crops (corn, soybean, spring wheat, cotton, winter wheat, and rice) closely align with USDA NASS figures, showing minimal variances as low as (0.01%, -0.68%, 0.19%, -4.39%, -5.78%, -1.28%). Notably, ICDL outperforms CDL in most assessments. This research consistently produces annual ICDLs from May to July that are readily accessible to the public in the iCrop system. Simultaneously, it presents an alternative technique for nationwide, in-season mapping of crop types.
Conference Paper
Monitoring the crops periodically and implementing sustainable agricultural practices are the considerable conditions for implementing efficient methodologies for Cropland Mapping. Detection of crop type, acreage calculation, and yield detection are the key research points that are under consideration of the research in today’s era. In this research work, the authors have focused on exploring the ability of Rapid-Eye data satellite images for crop identification/classification. A hybrid crop classification model was proposed for temporal and multispectral RapidEye imagery over the area of Fresno county of California state, United States. The studied area is enriched in a specific crop such as grapes, almonds, alfalfa, and dbl crop winwht/corn that covers 47.34%, 26.93%, 8.79%, and 3.51% of the area respectively. The ground truth data can be downloaded from the United States Department of Agriculture, CropScape-Cropland Data Layer by specifying a few parameters such as year, and area of interest (based on region, state, and county). The proposed classification model was designed by introducing the combination of a convolutional 1-D layer and two Gated Recurrent Unit layers and is aimed to obtain the best performance in terms of quantitative parameters. The authors introduced these layers to predict class probabilities based on a temporal sequence of observations. The proposed model outperforms for time-series data and resulted in a noticeable improvement in an overall accuracy of 96.31% and a kappa coefficient of 0.95.
Article
Full-text available
The remote-sensing based Flood Crop Loss Assessment Service System (RF-CLASS) is a web service based system developed and managed by the Center for Spatial Information Science and Systems (CSISS). The system uses Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS)-based flood data, which was implemented by the Dartmouth Flood Observatory (DFO), to provide an estimation of crop loss from floods. However, due to the spectral similarity between water and shadow, a noticeable amount of false classification of shadow can be found in the DFO flood products. Traditional methods can be utilized to remove cloud shadow and part of mountain shadow. This paper aims to develop an algorithm to filter out noise from permanent mountain shadow in the flood layer. The result indicates that mountain shadow was significantly removed by using the proposed approach. In addition, the gold standard test indicated a small number of actual water surfaces were misidentified by the proposed algorithm. Furthermore, experiments also suggest that increasing the spatial resolution of the slope helped reduce more noise in mountains. The proposed algorithm achieved acceptable overall accuracy (>80%) in all different filters and higher overall accuracies were observed when using lower slope filters. This research is one of the very first discussions on identifying false flood classification from terrain shadow by using the highly efficient method.
Article
Full-text available
Reliable satellite monitoring of agriculture is often difficult because surface variations occur rapidly compared to the cloud-free satellite observation frequency. Harmonic time series models, i.e., superimposed sequences of sines and cosines, have an established provenance for fitting satellite vegetation index time series to coarse resolution satellite data, but their application to medium resolution Landsat data for crop monitoring has been limited. Non-linear harmonic models have been shown to perform well over agricultural sites using single-year Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) time series, but have not been explored with Landsat data. The 2017 availability of Landsat Analysis Ready Data (ARD) over the United States provides the opportunity to investigate the utility of temporally rich Landsat data for 30 m pixel-level crop monitoring. In this paper, the capability of 5- and 7-parameter linear harmonic models and a 5-parameter non-linear harmonic model applied to a year of Landsat 5 Thematic Mapper (TM) and Landsat 7 Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus (ETM+) ARD is investigated. The analysis is undertaken over six sites, each defined by a 5000 × 5000 30 m pixel ARD tile, that together include the major conterminous United States (CONUS) crops identified by inspection of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Cropland Data Layer (CDL). The model fits are evaluated as the root mean square difference (RMSD) between the fitted and the observed Landsat data. Considering locations with at least 21 annual Landsat observations, the 7-parameter linear harmonic model (tile mean crop NDVI RMSD values ranging from 0.052 to 0.072) and the 5-parameter non-linear harmonic model (tile mean crop NDVI RMSD values ranging from 0.054 to 0.074) are shown to be able to fit annual Landsat NDVI time series for most CONUS crops, whereas the 5-parameter linear harmonic model cannot (tile mean crop NDVI RMSD values ranging from 0.072 to 0.099). If there are between 15 and 20 annual Landsat observations, the 5-parameter non-linear harmonic model is recommended for fitting annual NDVI crop time series, and if there are ≥21 observations, then either the 5-parameter non-linear or the 7-parameter linear model can be used. The 7-parameter model had marginally smaller mean NDVI RMSD values but larger standard deviations than the 5-parameter non-linear model, likely due to the relative robustness of the non-linear model to over-fitting and oscillations. None of the models could reliably fit crops with multiple stages, such as alfalfa, that are insufficiently sampled using combined Landsat 5 TM and Landsat 7 ETM+ time series. Given the utility of the growing season peak NDVI for crop yield applications, the date and magnitude of the model fitted peak NDVI are compared to quantify model reporting differences. The differences between the 7-parameter linear and the 5-parameter non-linear harmonic models are not large. For each ARD tile, the mean absolute differences in the estimated peak NDVI days varied from <2 days in the northern ARD tiles, which had short growing seasons and similar crops, to less than a week for the other tiles except for nearly 10 days for the California tile that had longer growing seasons and more diverse crops including crops with multiple stages. The paper concludes with a discussion and recommendations for future research.
Article
Full-text available
Monitoring agricultural land is important for understanding and managing food production, environmental conservation efforts, and climate change. The United States Department of Agriculture's Cropland Data Layer (CDL), an annual satellite imagery-derived land cover map, has been increasingly used for this application since complete coverage of the conterminous United States became available in 2008. However, the CDL is designed and produced with the intent of mapping annual land cover rather than tracking changes over time, and as a result certain precautions are needed in multi-year change analyses to minimize error and misapplication. We highlight scenarios that require special considerations, suggest solutions to key challenges, and propose a set of recommended good practices and general guidelines for CDL-based land change estimation. We also characterize a problematic issue of crop area underestimation bias within the CDL that needs to be accounted for and corrected when calculating changes to crop and cropland areas. When used appropriately and in conjunction with related information, the CDL is a valuable and effective tool for detecting diverse trends in agriculture. By explicitly discussing the methods and techniques for post-classification measurement of land-cover and land-use change using the CDL, we aim to further stimulate the discourse and continued development of suitable methodologies. Recommendations generated here are intended specifically for the CDL but may be broadly applicable to additional remotely-sensed land cover datasets including the National Land Cover Database (NLCD), Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS)-based land cover products, and other regional, national, and global land cover classification maps.
Article
Full-text available
Spatial land use information is one of the key input parameters for regional agro-ecosystem modeling. Furthermore, to assess the crop-specific management in a spatio-temporal context accurately, parcel-related crop rotation information is additionally needed. Such data is scarcely available for a regional scale, so that only modeled crop rotations can be incorporated instead. However, the spectrum of the occurring multiannual land use patterns on arable land remains unknown. Thus, this contribution focuses on the mapping of the actually practiced crop rotations in the Rur catchment, located in the western part of Germany. We addressed this by combining multitemporal multispectral remote sensing data, ancillary information and expert-knowledge on crop phenology in a GIS-based Multi-Data Approach (MDA). At first, a methodology for the enhanced differentiation of the major crop types on an annual basis was developed. Key aspects are (i) the usage of physical block data to separate arable land from other land use types, (ii) the classification of remote sensing scenes of specific time periods, which are most favorable for the differentiation of certain crop types, and (iii) the combination of the multitemporal classification results in a sequential analysis strategy. Annual crop maps of eight consecutive years (2008–2015) were combined to a crop sequence dataset to have a profound data basis for the mapping of crop rotations. In most years, the remote sensing data basis was highly fragmented. Nevertheless, our method enabled satisfying crop mapping results. As an example for the annual crop mapping workflow, the procedure and the result of 2015 are illustrated. For the generation of the crop sequence dataset, the eight annual crop maps were geometrically smoothened and integrated into a single vector data layer. The resulting dataset informs about the occurring crop sequence for individual areas on arable land, so that crop rotation schemes can be derived. The resulting dataset reveals that the spectrum of the practiced crop rotations is extremely heterogeneous and contains a large amount of crop sequences, which strongly diverge from model crop rotations. Consequently, the integration of remote sensing-based crop rotation data can considerably reduce uncertainties regarding the management in regional agro-ecosystem modeling. Finally, the developed methods and the results are discussed in detail.
Article
Full-text available
Flood events and their impact on crops are extremely significant scientific research issues; however, flood monitoring is an exceedingly complicated process. Flood damages on crops are directly related to yield change, which requires accurate assessment to quantify the damages. Various remote sensing products and indices have been used in the past for this purpose. This paper utilizes the moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer (MODIS) weekly normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) product to detect and further quantify flood damages on corn within the major corn producing states in the Midwest region of the US. County-level analyses were performed by taking weighted average of all pure corn pixels (>90%) masked by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Cropland Data Layer (CDL). The NDVI-based time-series difference between flood years and normal year (median of years 2000–2014) was used to detect flood occurrences. To further measure the impact of the flood on corn yield, regression analysis between change in NDVI and change in corn yield as independent and dependent variables respectively was performed for 30 different flooding events within growing seasons of the corn. With the R² value of 0.85, the model indicates statistically significant linear relation between the NDVI and corn yield. Testing the predictability of the model with 10 new cases, the average relative error of the model was only 4.47%. Furthermore, small error (4.8%) of leave-one-out cross validation (LOOCV) along with smaller statistical error indicators (root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and mean bias error (MBE)), further validated the accuracy of the model. Utilizing the linear regression approach, change in NDVI during the growing season of corn appeared to be a good indicator to quantify the yield loss due to flood. Additionally, with the 250 m MODIS-based NDVI, these yield losses can be estimated up to field level.
Conference Paper
Full-text available
Flood is defined as water that temporarily submerges land. In the United States, flood is being considered as an event only if it last over 72 hours, but the time frame is much longer in the Europe. The information of water bodies is an important source when examining floods. However, this data is not always available or accurate by traditional survey since water surface changes frequently. Remote Sensing provides an alternative method to traditional survey with lower cost and much frequent revisit cycles. Some sensors have very fine spatial resolution but relative long revisit circle; while some fine temporal resolution satellites are not able to provide spatial information in detail. This paper provides a brief review and comparison of major optical and Radar satellite sensors which are currently adopted in flood assessment. Result indicated that both optical sensors and Radar systems play important roles in flood assessment. Although many agencies use Radar or optical data independently when ding flood assessment, the potential of combining data from both systems is huge.
Article
Full-text available
Detailed and timely information on crop area, production and yield is important for the assessment of environmental impacts of agriculture, for the monitoring of the land use and management practices, and for food security early warning systems. A machine learning approach is proposed to model crop rotations which can predict with good accuracy, at the beginning of the agricultural season, the crops most likely to be present in a given field using the crop sequence of the previous 3–5 years. The approach is able to learn from data and to integrate expert knowledge represented as first-order logic rules. Its accuracy is assessed using the French Land Parcel Information System implemented in the frame of the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy. This assessment is done using different settings in terms of temporal depth and spatial generalization coverage. The obtained results show that the proposed approach is able to predict the crop type of each field, before the beginning of the crop season, with an accuracy as high as 60%, which is better than the results obtained with current approaches based on remote sensing imagery.
Article
Fig. 1. Overall flowchart of a multi-resolution approach for national-scale soybean area estimation in US and Argentina.
Article
Long-term studies allow for quantification of the effects of crop production practices, such as tillage and crop rotation, on soil quality and soil C and N stores. In two experiments at Ridgetown, ON, we evaluated the long-term (11 and 15 yr) effect of tillage system and crop rotation on soil quality via the Cornell Soil Health Assessment (CSHA) at 0-15 cm and soil organic C (SOC) and total N at 5-, 10-, and 20-cm increments to 120 cm depth. The CSHA soil quality score and SOC and total N were higher with no-till (NT) than fall moldboard plough with spring cultivation (conventional tillage, CT) and rotations with winter wheat [soybean-winter wheat (S-W) and soybean-winter wheat-corn (S-W-C)] compared with rotations without winter wheat. In both long-term trials, NT had ca. 21 Mg ha(-1) more or 14% higher SOC than CT in the 0- to 100-cm soil profile, a trend which contrasts previous research in eastern Canada. Thus, the two long-term trial results at Ridgetown suggest that to improve soil quality and storage of C and N, growers on clay loam soil in southwestern Ontario should consider adopting NT production practices and including winter wheat in the rotation.
Article
The objective of the study was to determine the influence of agronomic variables on soil light-fraction (LF) organic matter content. Soils from three long-term crop rotation studies in Saskatchewan, Canada, were analyzed for LF content and composition. The experiments, established at Indian Head, Melfort and Scott included wheatbased rotations. Within each site, the LF content was generally highest in treatments with continuous cropping or perennial forages and lowest in those with a high frequency of summer fallow. Fertilizer application generally favored LF accumulation. Differences in LF content were attributed to variable residue inputs and rates of substrate decomposition. The LF content is a sensitive indicator of the effects of cropping but, because of its transient nature, probably reflects primarily short-term effects. -from Authors