A preview of this full-text is provided by American Psychological Association.
Content available from Psychotherapy Theory Research Practice Training
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Elaboration of Countertransference Experience and the Workings of the
Working Alliance
João F. Barreto
University of Porto and Polytechnic Institute of Porto
Gil Nata and Paula Mena Matos
University of Porto
Alliance may impact psychotherapy outcomes both as a precondition that enables therapeutic work and
an evolving process that is therapeutic in itself. This study examined the participation of the elaboration
of countertransference experience (ECE) in alliance variation between therapist– client dyads early in
therapy and within dyads over time. A total of 44 session assessments nested within 12 dyads were
modeled through longitudinal multilevel analyses and utilized to examine the associations between the
ECE dimensions of Immersion and Reflection and alliance components across 4 time points within the
first 10 sessions of psychotherapy. Results supported the importance of initial ECE to explain differences
in alliance between dyads, the particular relevance of ECE with clients presenting lower levels of
personality organization, and the effect of personality difficulties on alliance change. Unexpected results
were found concerning the correlations between ECE and alliance and their covariation over time. In
conclusion, ECE dimensions appear to be involved in alliance formation, both in initial differences
between dyads and in changes over time within the same case. ECE seems particularly important with
more personality-disturbed clients. Future research should disentangle therapist and client contributions
and examine the participation of ECE in the resolution of alliance ruptures.
Clinical Impact Statement
Question: Is alliance formation associated with the psychological processes that therapists use in
making sense of their experiences with clients, defined as the elaboration of countertransference
experience (ECE)? Findings: Therapists’ engagement in their subjective experience (Immersion) in
the beginning of psychotherapy is higher in dyads with a better emotional bond. With clients with
personality difficulties, therapists’ explicit meaning-making (Reflection) may benefit clients’ sense
of collaboration and goal consensus. Meaning: In practice and in training, therapists should be
helped to understand how to make use of what they experience in and between sessions in ways that
improve psychotherapeutic processes and outcomes. Next Steps: Future research should disentangle
therapist and client contributions to ECE and examine its participation in the resolution of alliance
ruptures.
Keywords: countertransference, alliance, therapist factors, mentalization, longitudinal multilevel analysis
Although the association between alliance and outcome is
among the most robust findings in psychotherapy research (Flück-
iger, Del Re, Wampold, & Horvath, 2018), there is still room for
different understandings of the mechanisms underlying this asso-
ciation. Recently, Zilcha-Mano (2017) distinguished between a
trait-like component of alliance, the client’s general ability to form
satisfactory relationships with others, manifested in a strong alli-
ance and simultaneously influencing the capacity to benefit from
treatment, and a state-like component of alliance, referring to
changes in alliance that bring about therapeutic change. As the
author observed, although the former component may work as a
precondition that enables therapy to be effective, the latter estab-
lishes alliance, especially its bond component, as a therapeutic
ingredient in itself, capable of producing changes.
This article was published Online First August 29, 2019.
João F. Barreto, Center for Psychology at University of Porto, Faculty of
Psychology and Education Science, University of Porto, and School of Health,
Polytechnic Institute of Porto; Gil Nata, Center for Research and Intervention
in Education and Center for Psychology at University of Porto, University of
Porto; Paula Mena Matos, Center for Psychology at University of Porto,
Faculty of Psychology and Education Science, University of Porto.
This work has been supported by the Foundation for Science and
Technology (FCT) Grant SFRH/BD/96922/2013 and partially by Polytech-
nic Institute of Porto fundings (Programa de Formação Avançada de
Docentes, Editions 2012 and 2013) earned by João F. Barreto. This work
was also funded by the Center for Psychology at University of Porto, FCT
(FCT UID/PSI/00050/2013), and EU FEDER through COMPETE 2020
program (POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007294).
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to João F.
Barreto, Faculdade de Psicologia e de Ciências da Educação, Universidade
do Porto, Rua Alfredo Allen, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal. E-mail: jfbarreto@
fpce.up.pt
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
Psychotherapy
© 2019 American Psychological Association 2020, Vol. 57, No. 2, 141–150
ISSN: 0033-3204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pst0000250
141