ChapterPDF Available

Learning Management Systems: An Overview

Authors:

Abstract

The emergence of sophisticated communication technologies and mobile devices has enabled a new generation of information consumers to satisfy their demands for knowledge without the need to meet in a physical location. Software vendors, open-source developers, and educational institutions, cognizant of this development, have embraced systems that can facilitate the management of courses and engagement with students remotely. The technologies that facilitate the provision of courses over long distances are broadly termed “learning management systems” or “LMSs.” Learning management systems can be defined as web-based software platforms that provide an interactive online learning environment and automate the administration, organization, delivery, and reporting of educational content and learner outcomes.
L
Learning Management
Systems: An Overview
Darren Turnbull
1
, Ritesh Chugh
2
and Jo Luck
1
1
School of Engineering and Technology,
Central Queensland University,
Rockhampton, QLD, Australia
2
School of Engineering and Technology,
Central Queensland University,
Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Synonyms
Course management systems;Learning content
management systems;Online learning;E-learning
Introduction
There can be no doubt that technology has
transformed the way education is delivered to
people across the globe. We now live in an
interconnected world where the traditional con-
cept of formal learning, taking place in a single
physical location, is becoming increasingly less
relevant. Modern learners are becoming dissatis-
ed with the stand-and-deliver approach to
education that dictates attendance times,
learning venues, and modes of participation.
The emergence of sophisticated communication
technologies and mobile devices has enabled a
new generation of information consumers to sat-
isfy their demands for knowledge without the
need to meet in a physical location. Software
vendors, open-source developers, and educational
institutions, cognizant of this development, have
embraced systems that can facilitate the manage-
ment of courses and engagement with students
remotely. The technologies that facilitate the
provision of courses over long distances are
broadly termed learning management systems
or LMSs.Learning management systems can
be dened as web-based software platforms that
provide an interactive online learning environ-
ment and automate the administration, organiza-
tion, delivery, and reporting of educational
content and learner outcomes.
Acronym Confusion in the Online
Learning Space
There are many terms associated with online
learning and the technologies that have evolved
to support it. One persistent area of confusion is
in the denition of the acronyms: CMS and
LMS. The term CMS is often associated with
two distinctly different software applications:
content management systemsand course man-
agement systems.Content management systems
are essentially software applications designed for
© Crown 2019
A. Tatnall (ed.), Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60013-0_248-1
the creation and management of digital content in
a collaborative environment. Course management
systems on the other hand, according to Watson
and Watson (2007, 29), are:
used primarily for online or blended learning,
supporting the placement of course materials
online, associating students with courses, tracking
student performance, storing student submissions
and mediating communication between the students
as well as their instructor.
To further complicate matters, some vendors
and academics prefer to use the acronym LCMS
which stands for learning content management
systemwhen referring to content management
systems. The difference between a LCMS and a
LMS is that the latter is broader in scope and
includes the ability to track learner progress
through an online course. It is a gray area where
CMSs end and LMSs begin and many vendors,
users, and institutions regard the terms CMS and
LMS as synonyms. In this entry, the term LMS
will be the only acronym used to refer to online
learning platforms.
The Inclusion of LMSs in Distance
Education
The history of educational technology is a reminder
that its not the machine that matters itsnding
the tool that best serves your educational objective.
Thornburg (2014, 27)
The history of learning management systems
has its roots in distance education. Countries
such as Australia, with a geographically dispersed
population, adopted measures early in their his-
tory to enable access to education for students
who could not attend formal places of learning.
One of the most prominent manifestations of dis-
tance education in Australia was the School of
the Air (a correspondence school) which opened
to the airwaves in 1951 and is still in operation
today in some remote communities. The voca-
tional education and training (VET) and univer-
sity sectors in Australia also have a rich history
of distance education where, prior to the advent
of the Internet, communication and the
dissemination of learning materials was largely
conducted via regular mail services. The avail-
ability of dial-up Internet services to most Austra-
lians by mid-1995 meant that distance education
needed a radical overhaul and snail mail was no
longer a viable option to sustain distance educa-
tion services.
Perhaps it was Sidney Presseys creation in
the early 1920s of a learning machine,a device
that could administer questions through a window
prompting the user to select a response out of four
choices, that spurred the development of the rst
online LMSs. Or maybe it was the work of a
Canadian company, SoftArc in 1990 who built
the rst stand-alone learning system deployed on
Macintosh personal computers, that encouraged
software developers to dream of an online learn-
ing space. Whatever the inspiration, the arrival
of the Internet was set to revolutionize the way
people communicated and engaged with each
other and education providers realized that they
would have to adapt to this brave new online
world. The earliest manifestations of electronic
LMSs were little more than a platform for the
dissemination of learning materials online. These
systems could broadly be categorized as belong-
ing to one of two camps: proprietary and open
source. One of the earliest proprietary systems
was WebCT, developed at the University of Brit-
ish Columbia in 1995. The creation of WebCT as
an online learning platform was inspired by
research suggesting that academic performance
could be enhanced by the provision of web-
based resources. At the height of its use, WebCT
was the most widely used LMS globally with over
10 million users in 80 countries. WebCT was later
acquired by Blackboard Corporation who phased
out the WebCT name in favor of the Blackboard
brand.
Open-source systems by contrast, were devel-
oped collaboratively by software specialists with
a view to making the source code readily
available to organizations and individuals free
of charge. They were initially popular with uni-
versities and colleges who could readily down-
load the source code, adapt it to their own
circumstances, and build their own tailored
LMS solutions. A prominent example of an
2 Learning Management Systems: An Overview
open-source system in operation globally today
is Moodle. Moodle was developed by Martin
Dougiamas with the rst version released in
August 2002. The acronym Moodle stands for
Modular Object Oriented Dynamic Learning
Environment.The system was developed based
on a constructivist philosophy emphasizing the
role of learners as creators of content and not
merely spectators. Moodle is arguably the most
popular open-source LMS in use today with
almost 100,000 registered sites in 229 countries.
What Are the Features of LMSs That
Make Them Great?
A robust, high-quality LMS is a vital tool to
the success of any online course and can
make or break an institutions reputation in the
highly competitive education market. LMSs not
only need to provide content to learners, but
they must also facilitate timely and accurate
communication between learners, course facilita-
tors, and other institutional stakeholders. Yildirim
et al. (2004, 125) emphasize that in addition:
an LMS should be dynamic; that is, it should be
active, exible, customizable and adaptable.
Whether a LMS is proprietary or open source,
it will need to be capable of executing a variety of
functions that work together to provide a seamless
experience for the user. These functions include
the capability to disseminate knowledge, assess-
ment of learner competency, the recording
of learner attainment, support for online social
communities, communication tools, and system
security. Figure 1illustrates the categories of
features that are expected to be present in most
high-quality LMSs.
Course Management
Course management features encompass a LMSs
capacity to deliver timely relevant course material
to enrolled learners. It would include such features
as content management and control, class sched-
uling, and content-audit capabilities. The capacity
for users to contribute to content creation in their
own personal space could also come under this
domain.
Assessment
Assessment is a critical function of LMSs. A LMS
must be able to support the collection and storage
of assessable tasks, along with the assignment of
grades and feedback for each learner. Assessable
tasks can include assignments, tests, projects,
and portfolio evidence provided by the learner.
For institutions in the VET space, the capability
to automatically generate compliance reports is
particularly valuable as it facilitates compliance
with quality standards. LMSs should also be capa-
ble for providing learners with real-time informa-
tion on their progress in a course along with
relevant feedback generated by the instructor.
Tracking Progress
Attrition of learners is an issue that concerns many
institutions. In an online environment, the experi-
ence has been that learners are at a greater risk
of withdrawing from programs because of the lack
of face-to-face contact. The ability to track user
engagement in a course is therefore considered an
important feature. User tracking analytics can
include log-on frequency, time spent in different
sections of a course, communication interactions,
and the number of resources downloaded. With
appropriate reporting functions, course facilitators
are able to detect possible student performance
decits and intervene before course withdrawal
or termination becomes likely.
Gradebook
Gradebook functions include all LMS capabilities
that facilitate the dissemination of assessment
information to learners. Such functions include
individual scores of assessments, instructor feed-
back, and student attendance. The ability to gen-
erate aggregate reporting information such as
class grades, item score analysis, and at-risk stu-
dent information is included in this category.
Communication Tools
Communication tools within LMSs can
be broadly classied as synchronous or asyn-
chronous. Asynchronous tools support one-way
communications such as e-mail, discussion
boards, or Wikis. They are often preferred by
course facilitators because they can be initiated
in an ad hoc manner. Synchronous tools, on the
Learning Management Systems: An Overview 3
other hand, are two-way communication tools
supporting real-time information interchange.
Examples include instructor-led videoconferences
and interactive message boards. This latter class
of communication tools is often seen as important
to replicating traditional classroom-based com-
munications, thereby fostering a sense of commu-
nity among online learners.
Social Connectivity
One of the great criticisms of LMSs is the
lack of inherent community in online learning.
Features that try to replicate a social environment
online include discussion forums, live chats, and
videoconference tools as discussed in the previous
section. Some LMSs even have features that
monitor learner interactions with communication
tools and are considered invaluable for courses
that mandate class participation as an assessable
component of a course.
Security and Privacy
Security and privacy are of paramount importance
to the success of an online course. Important secu-
rity features in LMSs include user authentication,
access verication, password integrity controls,
and intruder detection. Privacy controls are also
important to ensure that sensitive information is
made available to the intended recipient only.
Ubiquitous Access
People are increasingly dependent on their mobile
phones to connect to the Internet. It therefore
stands to reason that online course participants
need to interact with LMS course environments
using their mobiles devices. Most LMS
providers design course content as responsive
HTML pages and are therefore accessible by
most smartphones and other mobile computing
devices, thus providing ubiquity.
Proprietary or Open-Source Systems:
Which Way to Go?
One of the major considerations that an organiza-
tion has in choosing a LMS is whether to opt for
a proprietary or an open-source system. There are
pluses and minuses to both approaches, and the
choice will largely depend on the resources and
expertise the organization maintains in-house and
the degree of control they wish to exercise over
the administration and future development of
the system. Proprietary systems come with the
advantage of being developed by a company that
specializes in the design and deployment of online
learning solutions. The acquisition of a proprie-
tary system usually includes installation and
end-user training and does not require any cong-
uration on the part of the client. However,
the client institution has limited control over the
features provided in the proprietary system and
certainly would be unlikely to have access to
system source code.
Learning Management Systems: An Overview,
Fig. 1 LMS feature categories
4 Learning Management Systems: An Overview
The alternative approach is for an organization
to develop its own LMS based on readily avail-
able open-source code. Moodle, for example, has
a popular following and maintains a system
of version control and technical specications
for each version.
Krouska et al. (2017, 2) described Moodle as
follows:
Moodle is a LMS designed to provide educators,
administrators and learners with a single, robust,
secure and integrated system to create personalized
learning environments. It has a wide range of stan-
dard and innovative features for supporting teach-
ing and learning process. Moreover, it allows for
extending system functionality using community
sourced plugins.
The source code for Moodle is freely down-
loadable, and each specic iteration has its own
set of installation instructions. Once the source
code for a LMS has been downloaded, organiza-
tions are free to adapt the code to suit their partic-
ular circumstances. Universities and colleges are
among the most prolic users of open-source
LMSs. This can be attributed to the availability
of in-house IT expertise in most universities and
colleges and the professional curiosity among
IT system decision-makers to develop an
understanding of LMS technology through its
implementation.
In-House Housing of Data or Cloud
Based
Cloud-based LMS solutions are rapidly develop-
ing as a viable alternative to on-site installation
for client organizations. The choice of adopting a
cloud-based LMS largely depends on the degree
of condence an organization has with sensitive
data being housed in an environment outside the
organizations direct control and whether or not
the organization has the infrastructure and exper-
tise to maintain the physical infrastructure neces-
sary to run an on-site LMS. Cloud-based LMSs
are usually proprietary systems where the vendor
packages the system functionality with the online
hosting of the clients data and then charges a fee
for the service based on the number of users
accessing the LMS site.
The Future of LMSs
As technology evolves and teaching methods
become more student-focussed, the LMS of the
future will become more than a helpful adminis-
trative tool. As improvements in bandwidth, stor-
age, and mobile device computing capacity
expand, the capabilities of LMSs will adapt to
ll emerging client demands. LMSs should
also be supported by an institutional structure
that promotes an equitable learning environment
(Chugh et al. 2017). The general trend of LMS
systems is to expand learner interactions with
course content by including the capability for
users to use mobile devices such as smartphones
and wearables such as smart watches and smart
glasses. Future developments in LMS technology
are also likely to include more sophisticated tools
to enable genuine synchronous communication,
such as videoconferencing apps and peer-to-peer
messaging. Below is a list of enhancements to
watch out for in future versions of LMSs.
Cloud-Like Functionality
There is already a trend toward cloud-hosted
proprietary LMSs as vendors target their offerings
to client organizations that do not have the
infrastructure or personnel to manage in-house
hosting. However, open-source systems such as
Moodle are also evolving to accommodate the
possibility of their systems existing solely in
web hosting environments. For example, a service
such as Softaculous can be used to install and
congure open-source apps such as Moodle,
directly into the client web hosting account.
Adaptive Learning
Adaptive learning technologies permit course
designers to tailor learning tasks and materials to
individual learner requirements. Examples of the
use of these technologies could include the release
of learning content based on prior learner assess-
ment, tailored knowledge tests that focus on learn-
ing gaps of each individual student, and the
incorporation of learner-created content into
each learners portfolio.
Learning Management Systems: An Overview 5
Microlearning with LMSs Connected Devices
Microlearning is an approach to education that
delivers content to learners in small, very specic
pieces. The learners are given control of when and
what they will learn. By creating bite-sized train-
ing modules within LMS systems accessible to
learners on demand, it will be possible for clients
to create their own curriculum tailored to their
specic requirements. According to Tauber and
Wang-Audia (2014, 10):
1% of a typical workweek is all employees typically
to focus on training and development.
The microlearning approach to training deliv-
ery is therefore likely to prove popular for workers
operating under tight time constraints.
Analytical Tools
Reporting functions which have a descriptive
purpose such as enrolment reports, assignment
submissions, and user access frequency are
already standard features of many LMSs. The
challenge for future systems is to tap into
the rich and diverse data collected by LMSs and
use this information to predict problems and
opportunities that may arise. For example, most
institutions are concerned about attrition and
would appreciate being alerted to circumstances
that may lead to a students failure or voluntary
withdrawal.
Social Capabilities
The attraction to formal learning for most students
in classroom-based environments is not only
the knowledge and skills to be acquired but also
the social dimension of study that participation in
higher learning provides. LMSs have often been
criticized for not adequately accommodating
this innate learner need. The inclusion of more
synchronous communication tools such as live
videoconferencing and real-time social media
apps is likely to strengthen the appeal of online
learning as a social activity. LMS vendors are
already tapping into existing social media apps
such as Facebook, Twitter, and WhatsApp along
with videoconferencing tools such as Skype to
provide a social framework for online learners.
Gamification
Learning games, if structured correctly, can pro-
vide a fun and stimulating way to engage learners
by rewarding their progress. Future gaming fea-
tures of LMSs could assign certicates or badges
to learners based on their mastery of course con-
tent and could even be used to assign a rank or
status to individual learners that could be shared
within the user community.
Conclusion
Learning management systems (LMSs) have
evolved in response to the demand for innovative
educational products that leverage advances in
information technology and telecommunications.
LMSs can be either proprietary, where the client
pays for the installation, maintenance, and end-
user licensing, or open source, where the source
code is freely available but the installation and
maintenance is handled in-house. LMSs have
many features that support online learning includ-
ing course management, assessment, learner
progress tracking, gradebook, communications,
security, and smartphone access. LMSs continue
to evolve, and future versions are likely to include
tools and features that facilitate more tailored con-
tent to individual learners, enhance social interac-
tions between online learners, and provide more
timely and relevant analytics to institutional deci-
sion-makers.
Cross-References
Blending learning provision for higher educa-
tion, integrating new waysof teaching and
learning
Challenge of Transforming Curricula with
Computers, High Impact Interventions and
Disruption
Computer Based Training (CBT)
Learning challenges presented by digital tech-
nologies to HE
Mobile Learning and Ubiquitous Learning
MOOCs, Teacher Professional Learning and
Deep Learning Conversations
6 Learning Management Systems: An Overview
Predicting ICT skills and ICT use of university
students
Technological Innovation in ICT for Education
References
Chugh R, Ledger S, Shields R (2017) Curriculum
design for distance education in the tertiary sector.
Turk Online J Dist Educ 18:415. https://doi.org/
10.17718/tojde.306552
Krouska A, Troussas C, Virvou M (2017) Comparing LMS
and CMS platforms supporting social e-learning in
higher education, vol 2018.https://doi.org/10.1109/
IISA.2017.8316408
Tauber T, Wang-Audia W (2014) Meet the modern learner:
engaging the overwhelmed, distracted, and impatient
employee. Bersin by Deloitte. https://legacy.bersin.
com/uploadedles/112614-meet-the-modern-learner.
pdf
Thornburg DD (2014) Ed tech: whats the use? The history
of educational technology is a reminder that its not the
machine that matters itsnding the tool that best
serves your educational objective (RESEARCH). T H
E J (Technol Horiz Educ) 41:27
Watson WR, Watson SL (2007) An argument for clarity:
what are learning management systems, what are they
not, and what should they become? Linking research
and practice to improve learning A publication of
the Association for Educational Communications &
Technology. TechTrends 51:2834. https://doi.org/
10.1007/s11528-007-0023-y
Yildirim S, Temur N, Kocaman A, Goktas Y (2004) What
makes a good LMS: an analytical approach to assess-
ment of LMSs. In: Information technology based
proceedings of the fth international conference
on higher education and training. ITHET 2004, 31
May2 June 2004. pp 125130. https://doi.org/
10.1109/ITHET.2004.1358150
Learning Management Systems: An Overview 7
... Learning management systems (LMSs) are defined as online learning platforms for designing, managing, and distributing training materials (Sabharwal et al. 2018;Turnbull et al., 2019). Learning management system varies accordingly to its feature and design. ...
Article
Full-text available
Learning must take place anytime and anywhere, whether through online or offline mode. Hence, this paper explores the perception of the students in the use of Facebook as a learning platform in a Practical Research class in the light of transactional distance theory. A qualitative research design following netnographic procedures and a self-administered questionnaire of open-ended questions was conducted. Insights on the narrative of the students revealed that the use of Facebook as a learning platform promotes learning, instruction, and students' interaction which is evident in the exchanges of conversation in the comment section of Facebook posts. Facebook as a learning platform, provides an avenue for teachers for instruction and feedback purposes. Nevertheless, the findings also revealed that there were students who found the use of Facebook as being problematic. Hence, caution of its use must be exercised. Academic integrity must be upheld to its highest standards regardless of the learning modalities. The researcher suggests that turning and maximizing the use of social media to academic use in distance or remote education is a good learning practice making sure that pedagogic interventions are in place along the way.
... At the core of an LMS's existence is the technology that facilitates the functions necessary to carry out educational activities. These functions include learning material dissemination, stakeholder communication, student grading, progress monitoring, and records maintenance (Fathema et al., 2015;Turnbull et al., 2019). In choosing an LMS, universities can outsource their requirements to an external provider (such as Canvas) or adapt an open-source solution (such as Moodle). ...
Article
Full-text available
Learning management systems form an integral part of the learning environments of most universities and support a wide range of diverse activities and operations. However, learning management systems are often regulated by institutional policies that address the general use of Information Technology and Communication services rather than specific learning management system policies. Hence, we propose that learning management system environments are complex techno-social systems that require dedicated standalone policies to regulate their operation. This preliminary study examined a selection of learning management system policies from twenty universities in four countries to identify some of the elements that are considered necessary for inclusion in policy documents. Seventeen individual elements of learning management system policy documents were identified from a synthesis of the policies. These were classified into six policy categories: Accounts, Courses, Ownership, Support, Usage, and Protection. The study also identified three additional qualities of learning management system policy documents: standalone comprehensibility, platform-neutral statements, and contemporary relevance. The findings of this study will serve as a useful template for developing dedicated standalone policies for the governance of university learning management systems.
... Salah satunya adalah karena LMS telah mencangkup semua hal yang dibutuhkan dalam pembelajaran. Terdapat beberapa fitur yang menjadi kelebihan penggunaan LMS (Turnbull et al., 2019), yang dapat dikelompokkan menjadi manajemen kelas, proses pembelajaran, alat pembelajaran, konektivitas dan fleksibilitas. (Gambar 1). ...
Article
Full-text available
This study aims to see how technology has determined our learning system through the use of ICT in online learning. The use of technology in the education sector brings a massive transformation in our learning system. In addition to that, the emergence of Covid 19 has also changed the education system into online learning. This study uses a qualitative approach and systematic literature review approach. Data collection used are observation and semi-structured interview with 2 informants that actively involved in online learning. The validity of this research use source triangulation. The result of this study shows that the ICT is used in every stages of learning process, from preparation, delivery and evaluation stage. Online learning cannot be separated from the role of technology, and it is shown that technology has determined online learning process.
... All kinds of e-learning platforms (e.g., MOOC, chaoxing, etc.) used in the six universities could be categorized as learning management systems (LMSs). Specifically, these e-learning platforms (i.e., LMSs) had the following features: (a) they were "web-based software platforms that provide an interactive online learning environment and automate the administration, organization, delivery, and reporting of educational content and learner outcomes" (Turnbull et al., 2019, p. 1); (b) they provided a series of services to support e-learning, namely security, communications, smartphone access, gradebook, learner progress tracking, course management, assessment (Turnbull et al., 2019;Turnbull et al., 2021). Similar to Pham et al. (2019), Prasetyo et al. (2021), and Zhou et al. (2021), this current study intended to investigate students' overall adoption of and satisfaction with these e-learning platforms instead of one specific platform, as these e-learning platforms shared the same features. ...
Article
Full-text available
The problem motivating this study is the fact that almost 19.70 million university students in China have been required to engage in e-learning under the government’s initiative of “Classes are Suspended, yet Learning is still Ongoing” during the COVID-19 epidemic, coupled with varied responses, uneven adoption of e-learning platforms and varying degrees of satisfaction toward them. Using the online database adoption and satisfaction (ODAS) model, this study examines the determinants which impact university students’ adoption of and satisfaction with e-learning platforms at this particular time in China. The ODAS model was also cross-validated using gender as a moderating variable. A purposive sampling procedure was used to survey a total of 1,136 students from six universities in five provinces or municipalities of China. The data for this survey were estimated using the Rasch model and structural equation modeling. Results exhibit that students’ adoption of and satisfaction with e-learning platforms were significantly measured by their computer self-efficacy, their intention to use e-learning platforms, and their perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness of these platforms, while the relationships among these components were moderated by gender differences. This empirically-based cross-validation of the ODAS provides recommendations for future studies, including practical implications for e-learning. This current study contributes to the body of knowledge in evaluating e-learning platforms during the COVID-19 epidemic.
... To that end, Learning Management Systems (LMSs) can come in handy. LMSs are web-based learning systems that allow educators to create, manage, and deliver course content (Dobre, 2015;Turnbull et al., 2019). LMSs can play a critical role in improving and supporting teaching and learning in today's pervasive digital environment (Bereczki & Kárpáti, 2021;Müller & Mildenberger, 2021;Turnbull et al., 2020). ...
Article
Full-text available
Blended learning combines face-to-face instruction and online learning experiences. It capitalizes on online learning management systems, one of which is Google Classroom (GC). Nevertheless, empirical investigations have mirrored literature gaps in understanding how the GC platform affects students’ behavioral intention to harness it for web-based learning. Therefore, this case study applied a modified version of the extended unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT2) as a theoretical underpinning to examine factors influencing graduate students’ behavioral intention to utilize the GC platform. Employing mixed methods explanatory sequential design, the study first analyzed survey data from 23 EFL graduate students implementing partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Subsequently, it conducted a qualitative stage carrying out semi-structured interviews for data collection and thematic analysis for its evaluation. The study through PLS-SEM results revealed that the most crucial determinant of students’ behavioral intention toward the GC platform was habit, which hung on facilitating conditions and hedonic motivation. Besides, it evinced facilitating conditions as the most important performing interaction factor in determining graduate students’ behavioral intention. Nonetheless, it indicated that performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, facilitating conditions, and hedonic motivation had no direct effect on behavioral intention. The follow-up qualitative findings explained that since the students mainly used the GC platform off-campus, the GC App on their smartphones and the interesting content on the GC platform sustained their habitual tendencies toward employing the GC platform. Accordingly, the study explicates implications and recommendations for theory, policy, and practice.
Article
Distance learning is not the product of the modern world as some may think; its origins go back to the 1720s with the very first experience of correspondence learning. Nevertheless, the concept of online learning, on the other hand, is the product of the modern digitalized world since its principal key element is the Internet. In this paper, we are going to clarify the ambiguity underlying two interrelated but different concepts which are ‘distance learning’ and ‘e-learning’. Then, we will trace the historical background of distance education in the world and in Algeria. In the end, we will present the results of a descriptive study that was conducted through an online questionnaire, and which targeted first-year students of the Department of the Arabic Language and Literature, University of Oran1 Ahmed Ben Bella. The purpose of this opinion poll was to reflect students’ impressions and evaluate their first and unique experience of learning English electronically during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article
Full-text available
Technological advances have revolutionized education. COVID-19 played a pivotal role as a catalyst for embracing technology enhanced learning. Without considering usability of the Learning Management Systems before their adoption may have a negative impact on the learning experience and lecturers may abandon the systems and opt for alternative online learning tools. This review paper highlights the definition, categories, capabilities, usability attributes and research gap with respect to Learning Management Systems. This paper will be essential for university management as they gradually embrace Learning Management Systems for online learning.
Article
The article reveals the features of development and integrated implementation of virtual learning environment with the use of modern digital technologies in the learning process of higher education. The article summarizes the interpretation of the concept of "virtual learning environment". Virtual learning environment can be interpreted as an immersive online learning environment that has a methodologically integrated learning system, provides an open interactive dynamic learning process in cyberspace using modern digital technologies that take into account the individual educational characteristics of students. The main subjects and functions of the virtual learning environment are identified. One of the links in creating a virtual learning environment is the development of free learning space through websites. It is stated that the teacher's site should be integrated into the learning technology designed and implemented by the teacher. Then the logic and structure of the lesson will be an element of the teacher's creativity, and he is able to choose his own strategy and teaching methods, and not just follow the presentation of the material proposed by other authors. In conditions when the idea of personality-oriented learning, built on the innovative activities of the teacher, is fundamental in education, this approach, according to our research, is crucial. The possibilities of modern network technologies involved in the content management system are described, the roles of participants in the educational process are determined, the tasks solved by educational platforms are indicated, their main functions in the learning environment of higher education institutions are described.
Chapter
Full-text available
This chapter introduces the concept of intelligent learning management systems (ILMS), which combines traditional learning management systems (LMS) with predictive modeling and interactive capabilities provided by artificial intelligence (AI). First, an overview is given of current LMS and the different functions they cover in the context of higher education. Second, several standard AI paradigms are discussed for solving different automated tasks. Both concepts are then combined into intelligent learning management systems, which extend standard LMS with AI-based capabilities for prediction, modeling, and interactive tasks that are useful in online educational settings. Several use cases of ILMS in the context of mathematics education (ME) are included, in particular examples of learning analytics (LA) and intelligent tutoring systems (ITS). The chapter concludes with a discussion on the future possibilities of AI in ILMS.
Chapter
Teknologi telah merubah bagaimana sistem pendidikan dibangun dan dijalankan, bukan hanya dalam aspek metode pembelajaran tetapi juga bisnis dan operasional dari penyelenggaran pendidikan, sebagai contoh, pemanfaatan teknologi di kampus perguruan tinggi dapat meningkatkan kualitas pembelajaran dengan mendorong keterlibatan seluruh pemangku kepentingan secara dinamis antara mahasiswa, pengajar, ekosistem dan juga komunitas secara lebih luas.
Conference Paper
Full-text available
Content and learning management systems (CMSs/LMSs) exist in abundance, providing a software platform for supporting web-based applications in an easy-to-use way. In educational contexts, the exploitation of these platforms offers integrated solutions on the distribution of course material, student management and interaction between stakeholders. This paper evaluates the use of representative LMS/CMS platforms for supporting social e-learning systems in higher education, in terms of technical and educational perspective. To this direction, respective prototypes were developed using the LMS platforms: Schoology, Moodle and Atutor, and the CMS ones: Drupal, Joomla and Wordpress, and a comparative analysis was conducted. One major conclusion is that these platforms facilitate the development of e-learning environments with social features through a user-friendly dashboard and a variety of education-oriented services.
Article
Full-text available
A growing number of students globally are enrolling in distance education programs and it is becoming important now, more than ever before, to design curriculum that reflects educational principles, represents elements of engagement and pedagogy and meets institutional and industry requirements. In doing so, it is vital to design contemporary curriculum that ensures these outcomes are attained. This paper adopts a narrative and integrative approach to advance the understanding of curriculum design practices, with particular relevance to distance education. In order to effectively design curriculum, this paper views the role of the educator as a conductor, technician and choreographer. Finally, a triad has been proposed comprising of pedagogy, technology and an engaged community of learners as a basis for ensuring curriculum meets contemporary practices.
Conference Paper
Full-text available
This study aims to describe the key issues in assessment of a learning management system for higher education institutions and eventually to construct a criteria list.
Meet the modern learner: engaging the overwhelmed, distracted, and impatient employee
  • T Tauber
  • W Wang-Audia
Tauber T, Wang-Audia W (2014) Meet the modern learner: engaging the overwhelmed, distracted, and impatient employee. Bersin by Deloitte. https://legacy.bersin. com/uploadedfiles/112614-meet-the-modern-learner. pdf
Ed tech: what's the use? The history of educational technology is a reminder that it's not the machine that matters -it's finding the tool that best serves your educational objective (RESEARCH)
  • D D Thornburg
Thornburg DD (2014) Ed tech: what's the use? The history of educational technology is a reminder that it's not the machine that matters -it's finding the tool that best serves your educational objective (RESEARCH). T H E J (Technol Horiz Educ) 41:27