- A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
- Learn more
Preview content only
Content available from Dialectical Anthropology
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
FORUM RESPONSE
Listening to migrant workers: should Canada’s Seasonal
Agricultural Worker Program be abolished?
Anelyse M. Weiler
1
&Janet McLaughlin
2
#Springer Nature B.V. 2019
Introduction
Leigh Binford’s essay cuts to the core of how Canada’s migrant agricultural worker program
undermines rights, freedom, and dignity for racialized migrants from the Global South while
boosting a horticultural industry that continues to consolidate. By reviewing research on the
Seasonal Agricultural Worker Program (SAWP), including his own, Binford underscores three
features of the SAWP that escalate expectations of worker productivity and growers’dispro-
portionate power over workers. Specifically, he draws attention to SAWP workers’
deportability, barriers faced by sending-country officials in defending the rights of fellow
nationals in Canada, and what he calls a “dual frame of reference.”Binford uses the dual frame
of reference to explain why SAWP workers generally put up with the wages and working
conditions on offer: they evaluate Canadian farm jobs against widespread poverty and grim
employment options in their countries of origin.
After establishing a trenchant analytical and empirical foundation, Binford drops something
of a bombshell by proposing to abolish the SAWP and related migrant worker programs.
Binford endorses abolition as a way to strengthen non-Canadian workers’rights. This includes
workers’access to social protections such as employment insurance, their ability to join a
union without fear of reprisal, and liberation from unfree employment relationships. However,
the essay does not elaborate on the implications of this proposal, the potential drawbacks for
workers, or what should be established in the wake of the SAWP. Well-intentioned calls to
dismantle the SAWP can unwittingly give fuel to xenophobic actors who regard migrants as a
threat to “our”jobs. Some labor organizers also see migrant workers as a drag on the labor
movement because when workers are deportable and replaceable, it is difficult for unions to
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10624-019-09563-4
*Anelyse M. Weiler
anelyse.weiler@mail.utoronto.ca
Janet McLaughlin
jmclaughlin@wlu.ca
1
Sociology, University of Toronto, 725 Spadina Ave, Toronto, Ontario M5S 2J4, Canada
2
Research Associate, International Migration Research Centre, Wilfrid Laurier University, Brantford
and Waterloo, 73 George Street, Brantford, Ontario N3T 2Y3, Canada
Dialectical Anthropology (2019) 43:381–388
Published online: 13 August 2019
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved.