ArticlePublisher preview available

Nitrogen and phosphorus constrain the CO2 fertilization of global plant biomass

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract and Figures

Elevated CO2 (eCO2) experiments provide critical information to quantify the effects of rising CO2 on vegetation1–6. Many eCO2 experiments suggest that nutrient limitations modulate the local magnitude of the eCO2 effect on plant biomass1,3,5, but the global extent of these limitations has not been empirically quantified, complicating projections of the capacity of plants to take up CO27,8. Here, we present a data-driven global quantification of the eCO2 effect on biomass based on 138 eCO2 experiments. The strength of CO2 fertilization is primarily driven by nitrogen (N) in ~65% of global vegetation and by phosphorus (P) in ~25% of global vegetation, with N- or P-limitation modulated by mycorrhizal association. Our approach suggests that CO2 levels expected by 2100 can potentially enhance plant biomass by 12 ± 3% above current values, equivalent to 59 ± 13 PgC. The global-scale response to eCO2 we derive from experiments is similar to past changes in greenness⁹ and biomass¹⁰ with rising CO2, suggesting that CO2 will continue to stimulate plant biomass in the future despite the constraining effect of soil nutrients. Our research reconciles conflicting evidence on CO2 fertilization across scales and provides an empirical estimate of the biomass sensitivity to eCO2 that may help to constrain climate projections.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Letters
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0545-2
1Department of Earth System Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. 2Institut de Ciència i Tecnologia Ambientals, Universitat Autònoma de
Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. 3Ecosystems Services and Management Program, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria.
4Woods Institute for the Environment and Precourt Institute for Energy, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. 5AXA Chair Programme in Biosphere
and Climate Impacts, Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Ascot, UK. 6Department of Biological Sciences,
Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia. 7Department of Earth System Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China. 8Department of
Environmental Science, Policy and Management, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA. 9Climate and Ecosystem Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National
Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA. 10Department of Microbiology and Ecosystem Science, Division of Terrestrial Ecosystem Research, Faculty of Life Sciences,
University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. 11Evolution and Ecology Program, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria.
12Centre of Excellence PLECO (Plants and Ecosystems), Biology Department, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium. 13Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California
Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA. 14Joint Institute for Regional Earth System Science and Engineering, University of California at Los Angeles,
Los Angeles, CA, USA. 15Department of Forest Resources, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA. 16Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment,
Western Sydney University, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia. 17CREAF, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain. 18Center for Ecosystem Science and Society,
Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA. 19Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA. 20CSIC, Global
Ecology Unit CREAF-CEAB-UAB, Bellaterra, Spain. 21Environmental Biology Department, Institute of Environmental Sciences, Leiden University, Leiden,
the Netherlands. 22College of Marine and Environmental Sciences, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland, Australia. 23Department of Forest,
Rangeland and Fire Sciences, College of Natural Resources, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA. 24Sino-French Institute for Earth System Science,
College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China. 25Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences,
Beijing, China. 26Land & Environmental Management, AgResearch, Palmerston North, New Zealand. 27School of Biological Sciences, University of Tasmania,
Hobart, Tasmania, Australia. 28Rangeland Resources & Systems Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture,
Fort Collins, CO, USA. 29School of Geographical Sciences, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, China. 30Department of
Plant Ecology, Justus Liebig University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany. 31School of Biology and Environmental Science, University College Dublin, Belfield,
Ireland. 32Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Balboa, Republic of Panama. 33Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Maastricht University,
Maastricht, the Netherlands. 34Department of Methodology and Statistics, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands. 35Soil Chemistry, Wageningen
University, Wageningen, the Netherlands. 36Institute of Agriculture, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Fuchu, Japan. 37Graduate School of
Agriculture, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan. 38USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory, Temple,
TX, USA. *e-mail: cesar.terrer@me.com
Elevated CO2 (eCO2) experiments provide critical information
to quantify the effects of rising CO2 on vegetation16. Many
eCO2 experiments suggest that nutrient limitations modulate
the local magnitude of the eCO2 effect on plant biomass1,3,5,
but the global extent of these limitations has not been empiri-
cally quantified, complicating projections of the capacity of
plants to take up CO27,8. Here, we present a data-driven global
quantification of the eCO2 effect on biomass based on 138
eCO2 experiments. The strength of CO2 fertilization is pri-
marily driven by nitrogen (N) in ~65% of global vegetation
and by phosphorus (P) in ~25% of global vegetation, with
N- or P-limitation modulated by mycorrhizal association.
Our approach suggests that CO2 levels expected by 2100 can
potentially enhance plant biomass by 12 ± 3% above current
values, equivalent to 59 ± 13 PgC. The future effect of eCO2
we derive from experiments is geographically consistent with
past changes in greenness9, but is considerably lower than the
past effect derived from models10. If borne out, our results
suggest that the stimulatory effect of CO2 on carbon storage
could slow considerably this century. Our research provides
an empirical estimate of the biomass sensitivity to eCO2 that
may help to constrain climate projections.
Levels of eCO2 affect the functioning and structure of terrestrial
ecosystems and create a negative feedback that reduces the rate of
global warming8,9,1114. However, this feedback remains poorly quan-
tified, introducing substantial uncertainty in climate change projec-
tions7,8. Experiments with eCO2 simulate the response of plants to
eCO2 and thereby provide important empirical and mechanistic
Nitrogen and phosphorus constrain the CO2
fertilization of global plant biomass
César Terrer 1,2,3*, Robert B. Jackson 1,4, I. Colin Prentice5,6,7, Trevor F. Keenan 8,9,
Christina Kaiser10,11, Sara Vicca 12, Joshua B. Fisher13,14, Peter B. Reich15,16, Benjamin D. Stocker 17,
Bruce A. Hungate 18,19, Josep Peñuelas 17,20, Ian McCallum3, Nadejda A. Soudzilovskaia 21,
Lucas A. Cernusak 22, Alan F. Talhelm 23, Kevin Van Sundert 12, Shilong Piao 24,25,
Paul C. D. Newton26, Mark J. Hovenden 27, Dana M. Blumenthal28, Yi Y. Liu29, Christoph Müller30,31,
Klaus Winter32, Christopher B. Field 4, Wolfgang Viechtbauer33, Caspar J. Van Lissa34,
Marcel R. Hoosbeek35, Makoto Watanabe36, Takayoshi Koike37, Victor O. Leshyk18,19, H. Wayne Polley38
and Oskar Franklin3
There are amendments to this paper
NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE | VOL 9 | SEPTEMBER 2019 | 684–689 | www.nature.com/natureclimatechange
684
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved
... Changes in future C sinks in global forests are largely driven by a CO 2 fertilization effect on net primary productivity (NPP), but the forecasted C sinks along with CO 2 enrichment remain controversial due to the potential constraint of nutrient limitation [2][3][4]. Especially the availability of the nutrients nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) widely limit plant growth in global terrestrial forests and thereby constrain the magnitude of NPP responses to rising CO 2 and climate warming [5][6][7]. Rapid climate warming has occurred in the past half-century and is projected to continue along with rising CO 2 concentrations [8]. Climate warming may significantly alter nutrient cycling and, thus, modify the nutrient constraint on future NPP and C sink capacity in response to future CO 2 enrichment ( Fig. 1). ...
... Woody plants, characterized by a C3 photosynthetic pathway, theoretically benefit from continuously rising atmospheric CO 2 concentrations [77]. Accordingly, previous studies based on experimental and modelling approaches have shown that forest biomass production and consequent C sinks increase significantly in response to CO 2 enrichment [7,78,79]. The fertilization effect of rising CO 2 concentrations is a key mechanism that drives an increase in future C sinks as a premise to achieve C neutrality and migrate climate change [80]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Purpose of Review Climate warming affects both nutrient availability and plant nutrient requirements, with a potential alteration of nutrient limitation to the CO2 fertilization effect on net primary productivity (NPP) and carbon (C) sinks, but the overall impact remains poorly understood. Based on a literature review, we synthesized the current understanding of climate warming-induced changes in (i) availability, (ii) demands, and (iii) limitation of the nutrients nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) in global forest biomes as well as (iv) how climate warming alters nutrient constraints on CO2 fertilization. Recent Findings Climate warming generally increases nutrient availability via accelerating nutrient cycling but this effect largely varies between different forest biomes, resulting in a considerable increase in N availability in temperate and boreal forests but a weak P availability increase in tropical forests due to a depleted soil P pool. Climate warming likely causes an increase of NPP and nutrient demands in thermal-limited boreal and temperate forests, but it can result in a reduction of growth and nutrient demand in forests with an exceedance of optimal growth temperatures (e.g. some of tropical forests) and/or warming-induced moisture deficiency. Overall, climate warming tends to alleviate N limitation in boreal and temperate forests to support NPP in response to rising CO2 concentrations. In contrast, climate warming combined with CO2 fertilization will likely strengthen P limitation in tropical forests. Summary Warming-induced changes in nutrient limitation can lead to biome-specific responses of NPP to rising atmospheric CO2 concentrations. Our review highlights the role of climate warming-induced changes in nutrient availability, demand, and limitation in constraining biogeochemical feedback to future CO2 enrichment.
... Meta-studies corroborate these findings, indicating a widespread issue. In a synthesis of 138 experiments, Terrer et al. (2019) projected that low soil P This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. availability was the primary CO 2 fertilization constraint in 25% of global vegetation. ...
Article
Full-text available
Phosphorus (P) is a finite resource and an essential macronutrient for plant growth. The importance of low soil P availability in constraining plant biomass responses to elevated CO2 (eCO2) is increasingly recognized. P fertilization could alleviate these constraints, but biogeochemical feedbacks under eCO2 may diminish the effectiveness of P fertilizer in raising soil P availability. Here, we present data from a botanically diverse grazed pasture enriched with CO2 (+84–111 ppm) and supplied with P fertilizer (1.5 g P m ⁻² year ⁻¹) for approximately 24 years, showing (1) a sustained 27% reduction in topsoil Olsen P under eCO2 prior to annual fertilizer application, and (2) an approximate halving of the short‐term (approximately 4 months) effectiveness of P fertilizer in raising Olsen P by 1 unit under eCO2. Similar results occurred with the Bray‐1 soil P test. These effects soon disappeared after CO2 enrichment stopped. Accumulation of moderately labile organic P in the eCO2 topsoil shortly after fertilization indicated rapid biological immobilization of newly applied P occurring under eCO2. Alternative P loss mechanisms under eCO2, including inorganic P depletion due to increased pasture growth, increased P offtake versus return through the plant→animal→dung pathway, or P movement down the soil profile, were not supported by the available evidence. Despite this, pasture P concentration and uptake were similar under eCO2 and ambient CO2, and the biomass of the P‐sensitive legume Trifolium repens was often greater under eCO2. Thus, either the fertilizer regime was sufficient to maintain a non‐limiting pasture P status, or integrated plant–soil biological adjustments under eCO2 compensated for reduced P availability. If compensatory mechanisms play a greater role in supporting crop P nutrition under eCO2 but are neglected by routine soil P availability tests focused on inorganic P, overapplication of P fertilizers will occur as CO2 levels continue to rise.
... In particular, nitrogen (N) is an essential nutrient in the biosphere and has emerged as playing a vital but largely overlooked role in both limiting primary productivity 5,9,10 as well as promoting gaseous emissions of nitrous oxide (N 2 O) 11 . CO 2 fertilisation of primary productivity is constrained by N limitation on land 2,12 , thereby constraining the magnitude of the negative feedback between atmospheric CO 2 and land CO 2 uptake (the land carbonconcentration feedback). In the ocean, primary productivity can also be N-limited 13 , although biological processes play a smaller role than physical processes in ocean CO 2 uptake. ...
Article
Full-text available
Current frameworks for evaluating biogeochemical climate change feedbacks in Earth System Models lack an explicit consideration of nitrogen cycling in the land and ocean spheres despite its vital role in limiting primary productivity. As coupled carbon-nitrogen cycling becomes the norm, a better understanding of the role of nitrogen cycling is needed. Here we develop a new framework for quantifying carbon-nitrogen feedbacks in Earth System Models and show that rising nitrogen deposition acts as a negative feedback over both land and ocean, enhancing carbon dioxide (CO2) fertilisation in a model ensemble. However, increased CO2 uptake due to rising nitrogen deposition is small relative to the large reduction in CO2 uptake when coupled carbon-nitrogen cycling is implemented in Earth System Models. Altogether, rising nitrogen deposition leads to only a minor increase in CO2 uptake but also enhances nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions over land and ocean, contributing only marginally to mitigating climate change.
... 5, 18,19 A potential increase in crop yields due to increased atmospheric CO 2 through increased photosynthesis (ie, the fertilisation effect) might be offset by increased nutrient limitation, temperature, and frequency of extreme events. [20][21][22] The changing climate is also predicted to decrease seafood availability, especially in tropical and subtropical regions, encompassing many LMICs that rely heavily on fisheries. 23 Fisheries might become less reliable, with periods of shortages and wide variability in catches. ...
... Therefore, gaining a better understanding of the drivers of vegetation change is of great scientific significance. Previous research on the mechanisms and drivers of vegetation greening dynamics has primarily focused on the effects of climatic and environmental changes, including the fertilization effect of carbon dioxide, air temperature and humidity, and nitrogen deposition [3][4][5]. In addition to these factors, human activities, such as land cover change and land management, have been identified as significant contributors [6,7]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Remote sensing observations have shown an increasing trend in the vegetation leaf area index (LAI) over the past three decades, with climate change and human activities identified as the primary drivers of vegetation change. However, a challenge remains in identifying and quantifying the role of different drivers. In this study, we employed the paired land use experiment (PLUE) approach, which is based on the concept of natural comparative controlled experiments, to assess the impacts of human activities, especially land management, in the Emin River Basin within the border between China and Kazakhstan. The comparable climate, alongside the significant differences in human activities between the two sides of the Emin River, makes it ideal for applying the PLUE method. We found that during 2001 to 2022, both regions experienced similar inter-annual trends. The leaf area index (LAI) increased in both regions (Chinese region: 8.3 × 10⁻³ yr⁻¹m²m⁻²; Kazakhstan region: 5.8 × 10⁻⁴ yr⁻¹m²m⁻²), with the most significant increase observed in the Chinese cropland region (2.79 × 10⁻² yr⁻¹m²m⁻²). Through residual trend analysis, we found that the increase in the LAI from April to May in the Kazakhstan region was mainly positively influenced by human grazing activities. Comparatively, the LAI growth from June to August in the Chinese cropland region was mainly attributed to land managements. This study emphasizes the influence of human activities, especially land management, on vegetation and reveals the key factors affecting the LAI within different periods.
... On the other hand, model behavior is also shaped by equations representing real-world processes, which affect the model's capacity to simulate system functions accurately (Luo et al., 2016). Studies show that current models fail to capture nitrogen and phosphorus limitations on CO₂ fertilization effects (Terrer et al., 2019). Nutrient limitations, particularly of nitrogen and phosphorus, can lead to reduced Rubisco-an essential, nitrogen-rich enzyme in photosynthesis-which, in turn, downregulates photosynthetic capacity and decreases CO₂ assimilation by vegetation (Ainsworth and Rogers, 2007;Long et al., 430 2004;Terrer et al., 2016;. ...
Preprint
Full-text available
Terrestrial ecosystems are crucial in mitigating global climate change, and Dynamic Global Vegetation Models (DGVMs) have become essential tools for simulating these ecosystems. However, uncertainties remain in DGVM simulations for China, highlighting the need to systematic evaluations of their dynamics across various time scales to enhance model performance. As such, we utilize reprocessed monthly MODIS Leaf Area Index (LAI) and Contiguous Solar-induced Fluorescence (CSIF) data as observational references to assess the long-term trends and seasonal variations of LAI and Gross Primary Production (GPP) simulated by 14 models (CABLE-POP, CLASSIC, CLM5.0, DLEM, IBIS, ISAM, ISBA-CTRIP, JULES, LPJ-GUESS, LPX, OCN, ORCHIDEEv3, SDGVM, and VISIT) in China from 2003 to 2019. Additionally, we evaluate the trends and seasonal variations of simulated LAI and GPP in response to environmental and climatic factors. Our findings indicate that: (1) While the overall trend of simulated LAI is captured, the spatial performance of simulated LAI and GPP is poor, with underestimation in forested areas, overestimation in grasslands, and misestimation in croplands; (2) The models misestimate the simulated LAI and GPP responses to changes in environmental factors, and their inaccuracy in capturing anthropogenic impacts on vegetation dynamics. We indicate that the main reason for the model's misestimation is that the model's understanding of the CO2 fertilization effect is inadequate, and thus fails to simulate the vegetation response to CO2 concentration. (3) Despite these issues, the models can effectively capture the seasonality of LAI and GPP in China, largely due to their robust representation of seasonal responses to climate factors.
Article
Increasing the stomatal aperture is a crucial strategy for enhancing the rate of CO2 absorption, which ultimately contributes to increased plant yield through improved photosynthetic activity. The successful implementation of this strategy depends on the rapid identification of positive regulatory environmental stimuli that promote stomatal opening. However, current research on stomatal opening regulation has predominantly focused on Arabidopsis and other crops, with comparatively less attention given to leafy vegetables. In this study, Chinese cabbage was selected as the experimental material. A suitable method for isolating stomata from Chinese cabbage was developed by comparing the advantages and disadvantages of several commonly used stomatal isolation techniques. Subsequently, an effective method for observing stomatal aperture was established through an investigation of the time and concentration dependence on potassium-containing solutions. Utilizing this observation method, the stomatal aperture response to twelve environmental stimuli was examined to facilitate the rapid screening of a formula to enhance stomatal opening. The stomatal aperture observation protocol involved incubating the abaxial epidermis, obtained via the epidermal peeling method, in an opening solution containing 0.5% KCl (pH 6.0) under light for 5 h. The results indicated that stomatal opening is concentration dependent on external environmental stimuli. The exogenous application of 100 µM Ca2+ (33.5%), 50 µM brassinosteroid (43.5%), and 10 µM cytokinin (43.4%) resulted in an increase in stomatal aperture of over 30%. This research provides a foundation for manipulating the stomatal opening of Chinese cabbage to enhance production.
Article
Full-text available
Vegetation impacts on ecosystem functioning are mediated by mycorrhizas, plant–fungal associations formed by most plant species. Ecosystems dominated by distinct mycorrhizal types differ strongly in their biogeochemistry. Quantitative analyses of mycorrhizal impacts on ecosystem functioning are hindered by the scarcity of information on mycorrhizal distributions. Here we present global, high-resolution maps of vegetation biomass distribution by dominant mycorrhizal associations. Arbuscular, ectomycorrhizal, and ericoid mycorrhizal vegetation store, respectively, 241 ± 15, 100 ± 17, and 7 ± 1.8 GT carbon in aboveground biomass, whereas non-mycorrhizal vegetation stores 29 ± 5.5 GT carbon. Soil carbon stocks in both topsoil and subsoil are positively related to the community-level biomass fraction of ectomycorrhizal plants, though the strength of this relationship varies across biomes. We show that human-induced transformations of Earth’s ecosystems have reduced ectomycorrhizal vegetation, with potential ramifications to terrestrial carbon stocks. Our work provides a benchmark for spatially explicit and globally quantitative assessments of mycorrhizal impacts on ecosystem functioning and biogeochemical cycling. Mycorrhizas—mutualistic relationships formed between fungi and most plant species—are functionally linked to soil carbon stocks. Here the authors map the global distribution of mycorrhizal plants and quantify links between mycorrhizal vegetation patterns and terrestrial carbon stocks.
Article
Full-text available
Tropical forests play a dominant role in the global carbon (C) cycle, and models predict increases in tropical net primary productivity (NPP) and C storage in response to rising atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations. The extent to which increasing CO2 will enhance NPP depends in part on the availability of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) to support growth. Some tropical trees can potentially overcome nutrient limitation by acquiring N via symbiotic dinitrogen (N2) fixation, which may provide a benefit in acquiring P via investment in N‐rich phosphatase enzymes or arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi. We conducted a seedling experiment to investigate the effects of elevated CO2 and soil nutrient availability on the growth of two N2‐fixing and two non‐N2‐fixing tropical tree species. We hypothesized that under elevated CO2 and at low nutrient availability (i.e., low N and P), N2 fixers would have higher growth rates than non‐N2 fixers because N2 fixers have a greater capacity to acquire both N and P. We also hypothesized that differences in growth rates between N2 fixers and non‐N2 fixers would decline as nutrient availability increases because N2 fixers no longer have an advantage in nutrient acquisition. We found that the N2 fixers had higher growth rates than the non‐N2 fixers under elevated CO2 and at low nutrient availability, and that the difference in growth rates between the N2 and non‐N2 fixers declined as nutrient availability increased, irrespective of CO2. Overall, N2 fixation, root phosphatase activity, and AM colonization decreased with increasing nutrient availability, and increased under elevated CO2 at low nutrient availability. Further, AM colonization was positively related to the growth of the non‐N2 fixers, whereas both N2 fixation and root phosphatase activity were positively related to the growth of the N2 fixers. Though our results indicate all four tree species have the capacity to up‐ or down‐regulate nutrient acquisition to meet their stoichiometric demands, the greater capacity for the N2 fixers to acquire both N and P may enable them to overcome nutritional constraints to NPP under elevated CO2, with implications for the response of tropical forests to future environmental change.
Article
Full-text available
Accurate assessment of anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and their redistribution among the atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biosphere – the “global carbon budget” – is important to better understand the global carbon cycle, support the development of climate policies, and project future climate change. Here we describe data sets and methodology to quantify the five major components of the global carbon budget and their uncertainties. Fossil CO2 emissions (EFF) are based on energy statistics and cement production data, while emissions from land use and land-use change (ELUC), mainly deforestation, are based on land use and land-use change data and bookkeeping models. Atmospheric CO2 concentration is measured directly and its growth rate (GATM) is computed from the annual changes in concentration. The ocean CO2 sink (SOCEAN) and terrestrial CO2 sink (SLAND) are estimated with global process models constrained by observations. The resulting carbon budget imbalance (BIM), the difference between the estimated total emissions and the estimated changes in the atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biosphere, is a measure of imperfect data and understanding of the contemporary carbon cycle. All uncertainties are reported as ±1σ. For the last decade available (2008–2017), EFF was 9.4±0.5 GtC yr-1, ELUC1.5±0.7 GtC yr-1, GATM4.7±0.02 GtC yr-1, SOCEAN2.4±0.5 GtC yr-1, and SLAND3.2±0.8 GtC yr-1, with a budget imbalance BIM of 0.5 GtC yr-1 indicating overestimated emissions and/or underestimated sinks. For the year 2017 alone, the growth in EFF was about 1.6 % and emissions increased to 9.9±0.5 GtC yr-1. Also for 2017, ELUC was 1.4±0.7 GtC yr-1, GATM was 4.6±0.2 GtC yr-1, SOCEAN was 2.5±0.5 GtC yr-1, and SLAND was 3.8±0.8 GtC yr-1, with a BIM of 0.3 GtC. The global atmospheric CO2 concentration reached 405.0±0.1 ppm averaged over 2017. For 2018, preliminary data for the first 6–9 months indicate a renewed growth in EFF of +2.7 % (range of 1.8 % to 3.7 %) based on national emission projections for China, the US, the EU, and India and projections of gross domestic product corrected for recent changes in the carbon intensity of the economy for the rest of the world. The analysis presented here shows that the mean and trend in the five components of the global carbon budget are consistently estimated over the period of 1959–2017, but discrepancies of up to 1 GtC yr-1 persist for the representation of semi-decadal variability in CO2 fluxes. A detailed comparison among individual estimates and the introduction of a broad range of observations show (1) no consensus in the mean and trend in land-use change emissions, (2) a persistent low agreement among the different methods on the magnitude of the land CO2 flux in the northern extra-tropics, and (3) an apparent underestimation of the CO2 variability by ocean models, originating outside the tropics. This living data update documents changes in the methods and data sets used in this new global carbon budget and the progress in understanding the global carbon cycle compared with previous publications of this data set (Le Quéré et al., 2018, 2016, 2015a, b, 2014, 2013). All results presented here can be downloaded from https://doi.org/10.18160/GCP-2018.
Article
Full-text available
Elevated CO2 concentrations increase photosynthesis and, potentially, net ecosystem production (NEP), meaning a greater CO2 uptake. Climate, nutrients and ecosystem structure, however, influence the effect of increasing CO2. Here we analysed global NEP from MACC-II and Jena CarboScope atmospheric inversions and ten dynamic global vegetation models (TRENDY), using statistical models to attribute the trends in NEP to its potential drivers: CO2, climatic variables and land-use change. We found that an increased CO2 was consistently associated with an increased NEP (1995–2014). Conversely, increased temperatures were negatively associated with NEP. Using the two atmospheric inversions and TRENDY, the estimated global sensitivities for CO2 were 6.0 ± 0.1, 8.1 ± 0.3 and 3.1 ± 0.1 PgC per 100 ppm (~1 °C increase), and −0.5 ± 0.2, −0.9 ± 0.4 and −1.1 ± 0.1 PgC °C⁻¹ for temperature. These results indicate a positive CO2 effect on terrestrial C sinks that is constrained by climate warming. © 2018, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.
Article
Full-text available
Terrestrial carbon–climate feedbacks depend on two large and opposing fluxes—soil organic matter decomposition and photosynthesis—that are tightly regulated by nutrients1,2. Earth system models (ESMs) participating in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 represented nutrient dynamics poorly1,3, rendering predictions of twenty-first century carbon–climate feedbacks highly uncertain. Here, we use a new land model to quantify the effects of observed plant nutrient uptake mechanisms missing in most other ESMs. In particular, we estimate the global role of root nutrient competition with microbes and abiotic processes during periods without photosynthesis. Nitrogen and phosphorus uptake during these periods account for 45 and 43%, respectively, of annual uptake, with large latitudinal variation. Globally, night-time nutrient uptake dominates this signal. Simulations show that ignoring this plant uptake, as is done when applying an instantaneous relative demand approach, leads to large positive biases in annual nitrogen leaching (96%) and N2O emissions (44%). This N2O emission bias has a GWP equivalent of ~2.4 PgCO2 yr⁻¹, which is substantial compared to the current terrestrial CO2 sink. Such large biases will lead to predictions of overly open terrestrial nutrient cycles and lower carbon sequestration capacity. Both factors imply over-prediction of positive terrestrial feedbacks with climate in current ESMs.
Preprint
Full-text available
Vegetation impacts on ecosystem functioning are mediated by mycorrhiza, a plant-fungal association formed by most plant species. Ecosystems dominated by distinct mycorrhizal types differ strongly in their biogeochemistry. Quantitative analyses of mycorrhizal impacts on ecosystem functioning are hindered by the absence of information on mycorrhizal distribution. We present the first global high-resolution maps of vegetation biomass distribution among main types of mycorrhizal associations. Arbuscular, ecto-, ericoid and non-mycorrhizal vegetation store 241±15, 100±17, 7±1.8 and 29 ± 5.5 GT carbon in aboveground biomass, respectively. Soil carbon stocks in both topsoil and subsoil are positively related to the biomass fraction of ectomycorrhizal plants in the community, though the strength of this relationship varies across biomes. We show that human-induced transformations of Earth’s ecosystems have reduced ectomycorrhizal vegetation, with potential knock-on effects on terrestrial carbon stocks. Our work provides a benchmark for spatially explicit global quantitative assessments of mycorrhizal impacts on ecosystem functioning and biogeochemical cycles. One Sentence Summary First maps of the global distribution of mycorrhizal plants reveal global losses of ectomycorrhizal vegetation, and quantitative links between mycorrhizal vegetation patterns and terrestrial carbon stocks.
Article
Full-text available
Less than half of anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions remain in the atmosphere. While carbon balance models imply large carbon uptake in tropical forests, direct on-the-ground observations are still lacking in Southeast Asia. Here, using long-term plot monitoring records of up to half a century, we find that intact forests in Borneo gained 0.43 Mg C ha-1 per year (95% CI 0.14-0.72, mean period 1988-2010) above-ground live biomass. These results closely match those from African and Amazonian plot networks, suggesting that the world's remaining intact tropical forests are now en masse out-of-equilibrium. Although both pan-tropical and long-term, the sink in remaining intact forests appears vulnerable to climate and land use changes. Across Borneo the 1997-1998 El Niño drought temporarily halted the carbon sink by increasing tree mortality, while fragmentation persistently offset the sink and turned many edge-affected forests into a carbon source to the atmosphere.
Preprint
Meta-analyses in psychology often lack the power to adequately account for between-studies heterogeneity. The number of studies on any topic is typically low, because research is cost- and time-intensive. At the same time, a host of potential moderators are introduced when similar research questions are examined in different labs, sampling from different populations, using idiosyncratic methods and instrumentation. Such between-studies heterogeneity presents a substantial challenge to data aggregation in classic meta-analysis. When the causes for heterogeneity are known a-priori, they can be accounted for using meta-regression. What is currently lacking, however, is an exploratory approach, to be used when heterogeneity is suspected, but it is not known which moderators most strongly influence the observed effect size. Recently, weighted regression trees have been used to explore heterogeneity in meta-analysis. Although this provides a promising first step, single trees have many limitations, which can be overcome by using random forests: A powerful learning algorithm, which is flexible, yet relatively robust to overfitting. The present paper introduces MetaForest: An adaptation of random forests for meta-analysis. We present two simulation studies, which illustrate that, in datasets as small as 20 cases, MetaForest outperforms single trees, in terms of three metrics: 1) Predictive performance; 2) power, as evidenced by the proportion of datasets in which the algorithm achieved a positive R2cv; and 3) the ability to distinguish relevant moderators from irrelevant moderators, using variable importance measures. We discuss how MetaForest can enhance the exploration of between-studies heterogeneity when conducting meta-analyses in diverse bodies of literature.