A preview of this full-text is provided by Springer Nature.
Content available from Nature Climate Change
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Letters
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0545-2
1Department of Earth System Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. 2Institut de Ciència i Tecnologia Ambientals, Universitat Autònoma de
Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. 3Ecosystems Services and Management Program, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria.
4Woods Institute for the Environment and Precourt Institute for Energy, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. 5AXA Chair Programme in Biosphere
and Climate Impacts, Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Ascot, UK. 6Department of Biological Sciences,
Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia. 7Department of Earth System Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China. 8Department of
Environmental Science, Policy and Management, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA. 9Climate and Ecosystem Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National
Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA. 10Department of Microbiology and Ecosystem Science, Division of Terrestrial Ecosystem Research, Faculty of Life Sciences,
University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. 11Evolution and Ecology Program, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria.
12Centre of Excellence PLECO (Plants and Ecosystems), Biology Department, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium. 13Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California
Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA. 14Joint Institute for Regional Earth System Science and Engineering, University of California at Los Angeles,
Los Angeles, CA, USA. 15Department of Forest Resources, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA. 16Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment,
Western Sydney University, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia. 17CREAF, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain. 18Center for Ecosystem Science and Society,
Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA. 19Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA. 20CSIC, Global
Ecology Unit CREAF-CEAB-UAB, Bellaterra, Spain. 21Environmental Biology Department, Institute of Environmental Sciences, Leiden University, Leiden,
the Netherlands. 22College of Marine and Environmental Sciences, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland, Australia. 23Department of Forest,
Rangeland and Fire Sciences, College of Natural Resources, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA. 24Sino-French Institute for Earth System Science,
College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China. 25Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences,
Beijing, China. 26Land & Environmental Management, AgResearch, Palmerston North, New Zealand. 27School of Biological Sciences, University of Tasmania,
Hobart, Tasmania, Australia. 28Rangeland Resources & Systems Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture,
Fort Collins, CO, USA. 29School of Geographical Sciences, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, China. 30Department of
Plant Ecology, Justus Liebig University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany. 31School of Biology and Environmental Science, University College Dublin, Belfield,
Ireland. 32Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Balboa, Republic of Panama. 33Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Maastricht University,
Maastricht, the Netherlands. 34Department of Methodology and Statistics, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands. 35Soil Chemistry, Wageningen
University, Wageningen, the Netherlands. 36Institute of Agriculture, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Fuchu, Japan. 37Graduate School of
Agriculture, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan. 38USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory, Temple,
TX, USA. *e-mail: cesar.terrer@me.com
Elevated CO2 (eCO2) experiments provide critical information
to quantify the effects of rising CO2 on vegetation1–6. Many
eCO2 experiments suggest that nutrient limitations modulate
the local magnitude of the eCO2 effect on plant biomass1,3,5,
but the global extent of these limitations has not been empiri-
cally quantified, complicating projections of the capacity of
plants to take up CO27,8. Here, we present a data-driven global
quantification of the eCO2 effect on biomass based on 138
eCO2 experiments. The strength of CO2 fertilization is pri-
marily driven by nitrogen (N) in ~65% of global vegetation
and by phosphorus (P) in ~25% of global vegetation, with
N- or P-limitation modulated by mycorrhizal association.
Our approach suggests that CO2 levels expected by 2100 can
potentially enhance plant biomass by 12 ± 3% above current
values, equivalent to 59 ± 13 PgC. The future effect of eCO2
we derive from experiments is geographically consistent with
past changes in greenness9, but is considerably lower than the
past effect derived from models10. If borne out, our results
suggest that the stimulatory effect of CO2 on carbon storage
could slow considerably this century. Our research provides
an empirical estimate of the biomass sensitivity to eCO2 that
may help to constrain climate projections.
Levels of eCO2 affect the functioning and structure of terrestrial
ecosystems and create a negative feedback that reduces the rate of
global warming8,9,11–14. However, this feedback remains poorly quan-
tified, introducing substantial uncertainty in climate change projec-
tions7,8. Experiments with eCO2 simulate the response of plants to
eCO2 and thereby provide important empirical and mechanistic
Nitrogen and phosphorus constrain the CO2
fertilization of global plant biomass
César Terrer 1,2,3*, Robert B. Jackson 1,4, I. Colin Prentice5,6,7, Trevor F. Keenan 8,9,
Christina Kaiser10,11, Sara Vicca 12, Joshua B. Fisher13,14, Peter B. Reich15,16, Benjamin D. Stocker 17,
Bruce A. Hungate 18,19, Josep Peñuelas 17,20, Ian McCallum3, Nadejda A. Soudzilovskaia 21,
Lucas A. Cernusak 22, Alan F. Talhelm 23, Kevin Van Sundert 12, Shilong Piao 24,25,
Paul C. D. Newton26, Mark J. Hovenden 27, Dana M. Blumenthal28, Yi Y. Liu29, Christoph Müller30,31,
Klaus Winter32, Christopher B. Field 4, Wolfgang Viechtbauer33, Caspar J. Van Lissa34,
Marcel R. Hoosbeek35, Makoto Watanabe36, Takayoshi Koike37, Victor O. Leshyk18,19, H. Wayne Polley38
and Oskar Franklin3
There are amendments to this paper
NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE | VOL 9 | SEPTEMBER 2019 | 684–689 | www.nature.com/natureclimatechange
684
Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. Rights reserved