ChapterPDF Available

ASTERIG. A szerencsejáték-termékek függőségi kockázatainak egy lehetséges mérése és empirikus vizsgálata a Magyarországon kínált szerencsejátékokra

Authors:

Abstract

Bár a legtöbb ember, aki szerencsejátékot játszik, ezt anélkül teszi, hogy rá nézve káros következményei lennének e tevékenységnek, mégis egyeseknek visszatérő, maladaptív viselkedészavart okoz a szerencsejáték. Gyakran a kóros játékszenvedély pénzügyi veszteséggel jár, problémát okoz a családban és az interperszonális kapcsolatokban, továbbá más pszichiátriai rendellenességekkel együtt fordul elő. Közismert, hogy a különböző típusú szerencsejátékok különböző mértékben vezetnek maladaptív mintákhoz a szerencsejátékos viselkedésben . Közcél, hogy kiegyensúlyozott hozzáféréssel a szerencsejátékok kockázatát minimalizáljuk. Egészen a közelmúltig ezen kockázat pontos felmérésének lehetősége a különböző szerencsejáték termékeknél szinte lehetetlen volt. Az ASTERIG nevű eszközt, eredetileg Németországban fejlesztették ki 2006 és 2010 között . Ez tulajdonképpen egy olyan értékelési eszköz, amellyel tíz dimenzió mentén lehet mérni a kockázatot - különböző pontszámok alapján - bármely szerencsejáték termékek esetén. Az értékelés során a függőségi potenciál szempontjából lehet összehasonlítást végezni a különböző szerencsejáték termékek között. Az értékelés lehetővé teszi, hogy akár a jogalkotási, joggyakorlati és közigazgatási szinten alkalmazzák, mivel megmutatja minden egyes játék egyedi kockázati potenciálját, ezáltal lehetővé teszi a kockázat pontos meghatározását . Az egyes szerencsejáték termékek veszélyességi potenciáljának beazonosítása és összehasonlítása globálisan 10 különböző kockázati dimenzió mentén történik. Megjegyezzük, hogy minden egyes szerencsejáték termékeknél egyedileg kell a termékjellemzőket figyelembe venni, nem pedig termékcsoportonként (lottók, gépek, sorsjegyek) vagy szolgáltatónként, mivel eltérések lehetnek az egyedi azonosítók között, és a termékcsoportokon belül is eltérő lehet az egyes termékek kockázati potenciálja. Például a játékgépeken változhat a jackpot összege, amely hatással lehet a potenciális kockázatra. Ez az objektív és szisztematikus eszköz, segíthet az orvosi és pszichológiai kutatásokban, és a politikai döntéshozatalban, annak a kockázatnak az értékeléséhez, mely az egyes szerencsejáték termékeket összehasonlítja más szerencsejátékokkal. Emellett nemzetközi kontextusban is lehetővé teszi a különböző szerencsejátékos termékek kockázati mértékének beazonosítását. Hasonló kutatások folynak Nagy- Britanniában , Finnországban és Svédországban . Ugyanakkor ezeknek a kutatásoknak az empirikus eredményei még nem jelentek meg, így az értékelésük is nehéz .
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"!1!"!!
!
!!!
Assessment!Tool!to!Measure!and!Evaluate!the!
Risk!Potential!of!Gambling!Products!
ASTERIG!
A!global!validation!
!
by!
!
Carlos!Blanco!
Alex!Blaszczynski!!
Reiner!Clement!
Jeffrey!Derevensky!
Anna!E.!Goudriaan!
David!C.!Hodgins!
Ruth!J.!van!Holst!
Ángela!Ibáñez!!
Silvia!S.!Martins!
Chantal!Moersen!
Sabrina!Molinaro!
Adrian!Parke!
Franz!W.!Peren!
Nancy!M.!Petry!
Heather!Wardle!
!
May!2013!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"!2!"!!
!
!
!
"#$%&$%'!()*&!
!
List!of!tables!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!3!
List!of!figures!!!!!!!!!!!!3!
!
1! Introduction!!!!!!!!!!!4!
2! Methodology!!!!!!!!!!!5!
3! Example!!!!!!!!!12!
4! Conclusion!and!future!directions!!!!!!20!
5! References!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!21!
!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"!3!"!!
!
+,'%!#-!%)./&'!
!
Table!1:!!Experts!of!global!validation!of!ASTERIG! ! !!!! ! !!6!
Table!2:!!Approach:!multiplication!of!general!weights!with!individual!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!individual!scales!!!!!!!11!
Table!3:!!Approach:!multiplication!of!general!weights!with!individual!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!scales!of!the!fictitious!sport!betting!game!bet$for$soccer! ! 16!
Table!4:!!Risk!potential!classification!of!gambling!products!!!19*
!
!
+,'%!#-!-,*01&'!
!
Figure!1:!!Radar!chart!showing!the!risk!potential!of!the!fictitious!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!sport!betting!game!bet$for$soccer! ! ! ! ! 17!
Figure!2:!!Bar!chart!showing!the!risk!potential!of!the!fictitious!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!sport!betting!game!bet$for$soccer! ! ! ! ! 18!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"!4!"!!
!
2!!!3$%1#405%,#$!
Although!most!individuals!who!gamble!do!so!without!any!adverse!consequences,!some!
individuals!develop!a!recurrent,!maladaptive!pattern!of!gambling!behaviour,!often!called!
pathological! gambling! or! gambling! disorder,! that! is! associated! with! financial! losses,!
disruption! of! family! and! interpersonal! relationships,! and! co"occurring! psychiatric!
disorders.!Identifying!whether!different!types!of!gambling!modalities!vary!in!their!ability!
to! lead! to! maladaptive! patterns! of! gambling! behaviour! is! essential! to! develop! public!
policies!that! seek!to! balance!access! to!gambling! opportunities!with! minimizing!risk! for!
the! potential! adverse! consequences! of! gambling! behaviour.1! Until! recently,! assessing!
the! risk! potential! of! different! types! of! gambling! products! was! nearly! impossible.!
ASTERIG,! initially! developed! in! Germany! in! 2006"2010,2! is! an! assessment! tool! to!
measure!and!to!evaluate!the!risk!potential!of!any!gambling!product!based!on!scores!on!
ten! dimensions.! In! doing! so,! it! also! allows! a! comparison! to! be! drawn! between! the!
addictive! potential! of! different! gambling! products.! Furthermore,! the! tool! highlights!
where!the!specific! risk!potential!of! each! specific!gambling!product! lies.!This!makes! it!a!
valuable!tool! at!the! legislative,!case! law,! and! administrative! levels!as! it!allows! the!risk!
potential!of! individual! gambling!products! to!be!identified! and!to! be! compared!globally!
and! across! 10! different! dimensions! of! risk! potential.! We! note! that! specific! gambling!
products! should! always! be! evaluated! rather! than! product! groups! (lotteries,! slot!
machines)! or! providers,! as! there! may! be! variations! among! those! product! groups! that!
impact! their! risk! potential.! For! example,! slot! machines! may! vary! on! the! amount! of!
jackpot,!which!may!influence!their!risk!potential.!
!
The!availability! of!an!objective,! systematic!tool! to!assess!the! risk!potential! of!different!
gambling!products!could!help! medical!and!psychological!scientists,! lawyers,!judges!and!
policy"makers! assess! the! risk! potential! of! a! special! gambling! product! and! potentially!
allow!objective!comparisons!with!other!gambling!products.3!
!
Also,! within! an! international! context,! the! desire! for! classifying! the! degree! of! risk!
potential! of! gambling! products! is! beyond! controversy.! Similar! research! activities! from!
Great!Britain,4! Finland5! and! Sweden6! are!known.! However! the!empirical! base!of! these!
operations!has!not!been!published,!making!their!assessment!difficult.7!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
1!Cf.!Peren!(2011).!
2!ASTERIG!was!originally!published!in!The*Journal*of*Gambling*Business*and*Economics,*2011,*Vol.*5,*No.*2,*
pp*54$66.!Cf.!Peren!(2011).!!
3!Cf.!Clement,!Goudriaan,!van!Holst,!Molinaro,!Moersen,!Nilsson,!Parke,!Peren,!Rebeggiani,!Stoever,!
Terlau,!Wilhelm!(2012).!!
4!GamGARD!"!Gaming!Assessment!Measure!–!Guidance!about!Responsible!Design;!
http://www.gamgard.com![viewed!2013"03"17].!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"!5!"!!
!
6!!!7&%8#4#/#*9!!
!
All! gambling! products! do! not! have! the! same! risk! potential.! Gambling! products! are!
characterized! by! situational! parameters! realized! in! observable! scales! that! combined,!
result! in! more! or! less! distinct! risk! potential.! Significant! parameters! can! be! identified!
through!expert!consensus!within!the!framework!of!a!Delphi!study.8!!
!
Therefore,!two!years!after!ASTERIG!was!developed,!it!made!sense!for!it!to!be!validated!
and! updated! with! the! input! of! an! international! group! of! researchers! to! refine! and!
enhance!the!instrument.!A! global!survey!of!experts! on!gambling!disorder!research!and!
treatment!using!a!standardized!questionnaire!was!undertaken!to!improve!ASTERIG.!!
!
Development!of!the!revised! ASTERIG!was!based!on!the!already!existing!ASTERIG"model!
and!was!completed!in!two!rounds.!In!the!first!round,!the!experts!were!sent!a!proposed!
revision! of! the! original! ASTERIG! and! were! asked! first! to! review! and! to! propose!
improvements! for! the! dimensions! (significant! parameters)! of! the! ASTERIG"model,!
including!the!possibility! of!giving!their!own! proposed!scales.!The!experts! were!allowed!
to!change!or!modify!the!dimensions!as!well!as!the!original!scales!as!much!as!necessary.!
They!were!also!allowed!to!suggest!addition!or!deletion!of!new!dimensions!and!to!change!
the! range! of! the! existing! dimensions.! In! the! original! version! there! were! scales! whose!
range!did!not!include!zero.!This!implied!that!those!dimensions!would!always!contribute!
to!the!overall!score,!regardless!of!the!characteristics!of!the!game.!!
!
Based!on!responses!to!the!first!round,!results!were!summarized!and!a!second!round!was!
sent! to! all! experts! who! contributed! to! the! first! round.! Participants! in! the! survey,!
conducted!in!the!fall!and!winter!of!2012!are!listed!in!Table!1.!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
5!Product!Evaluation!Method!for!Reducing!Potential!Hazards!(Finland);!http://www.veikkaus.fi![viewed!
2013"03"17].!
6!Playscan!(Sweden);!http://www.spelinstitutet.se![viewed!2013"03"17].!
7!Cp.!Peren!(2009).!!
8!The!Delphi!method!is!a!structured!communication!technique!in!form!of!a!systematic,!multi"level,!and!
feedback"orientated!procedure,!in!which!in!several!runs!interrogations!of!a!panel!of!experts!for!problem!
solving!solutions!are!surveyed,!until!a!pre"defined!stop!criterion!is!achieved.!Cf.!Linstone,!H.A.,!Turoff,!M.!
(1975);!http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delphi_method![viewed!2013"03"17].!
!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"!6!"!!
!
:;(&1%'!
"#0$%19!
3$'%,%0%,#$!
Dr.!Carlos!Blanco!
<=>!
Department!of!Psychiatry!Columbia!University,!
New!York!State!Psychiatric!Institute!!
Dr.!Alex!Blaszczynski!
><=!
University!of!Sydney,!School!of!Psychology!
Dr.!Reiner!Clement!
?:!
Bonn"Rhein"Sieg!University,!Department!of!
Business!
Dr.!Jeffrey!Derevensky!
">@!
McGill!University,!!International!Centre!for!Youth!
Gambling!Problems!and!High!Risk!Behaviors!
Dr.!Anna!E.!Goudriaan!
@+!
University!of!Amsterdam,!Academic!Medical!
Center!
Dr.!David!C.!Hodgins!
">@!
University!of!Calgary,!Department!of!Psychology!
Dr.!Ruth!J.!van!Holst!
@+!
University!of!Amsterdam,!Academic!Medical!
Center!
Dr.!Ángela!Ibáñez!
:=A!
Alcala!University,!Department!of!Psychiatry,!
Ramon!y!Cajal!Hospital!
Dr.!Silvia!S.!Martins!
<=>!
Columbia!University,!Mailman!School!of!Public!
Health!
Dr.!Chantal!Moersen!
?:!
Charité!Berlin!
Dr.!Sabrina!Molinaro!
3!
CNR!"!Istituto!di!Fisiologia!Clinica!Sezione!di!
Epidemiologia!Pisa!
Dr.!Adrian!Parke!
<B!
University!of!Lincoln!
Dr.!Franz!W.!Peren!
?:!
Bonn"Rhein"Sieg!University,!Department!of!
Business!
Dr.!Nancy!M.!Petry!
<=>!
University!of!Connecticut,!Health!Center!
Heather!Wardle!
<B!
National!Centre!for!Social!Research!
Table!1:!!Experts!of!global!validation!of!ASTERIG!
!
The! experts! agreed! that! the! following! ten! dimensions! (parameters)! provided! a! useful!
framework! to! examine! the! risk! potential! of! different! gambling! products.! The! experts!
chose!ten!relevant!dimensions!with!the!following!scales,!in!which!higher!scores!indicate!
higher!risk!potential.!Those!scales!have!been!modified!and!have!been!standardized!the!
range! of! the! scales! for! all! dimensions! between! 0! (of! no! importance)! and! 10! (of! very!
great!importance).!All!scales!are!made!symmetric.!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"!7!"!!
!
!
2C :D&$%!-1&E0&$59!
!
Definition:!Unit!of!time!between!stake,!gambling!result!and!next!stake!opportunity.!
!
=5)/&!
!
>!6!days!
>!3!min!
!
≤!10!min!
>!1!min!
!
≤!3!min!
>!15!sec!
!
≤!1!min!
!
>!5!sec!
!
≤!15!sec!
!
!
!
!
≤!5!sec!
0!
5!
6.25!
7.5!
8.75!
10!
!
!
!
!
6C 3$%&1D)/!#-!()9.)5F!
Definition:!Period!of!time!between!gambling!result!and!notification!of!payment!or!actual!
receipt!of!payment.!
!
=5)/&!
!
>!6!days!
>!3!min!
!
≤!10!min!
>!1!min!
!
≤!3!min!
>!15!sec!
!
≤!1!min!
!
>!5!sec!
!
≤!15!sec!
!
!
!
!
≤!5!sec!
0!
5!
6.25!
7.5!
8.75!
10!
!
GC H)5F(#%!
Definition:!An!extraordinary!top!prize!typically!in!the!form!of!a!large!amount!of!money!
formed!by!the!accumulation!of!previous!bets.!
!
=5)/&!!
non!existent!
!
≥!0!$!
!
<!100!$!
!
!
≥!100!$!
!
<!1.000!$!
!
!
≥!1.000!$!
!
<!10.000!$!
!
!
≥!10.000!$!
!
<!50.000!$!
!
!
≥!50.000!$!
!
<!100.000!$!
!
!
≥!100.000!$!
!
<!1!Mio.!$!
!
!
≥!1!Mio.!$!
!
!
0!
1.25!
2.5!
4!
6!
7.5!
8.75!
10!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"!8!"!!
!
!
IC "#$%,$0,%9!#-!(/)9,$*!
Definition:!Period!of!time!during!which!it!is!possible!to!gamble!without!interruption.!!
!
=5)/&!!
≤!5!min!
of!continuous!
gambling!!
!
!
>!5!min!
≤!30!min!
of!continuous!
gambling!
!
!
>!30!min!
≤!1!hour!
of!continuous!
gambling!
!
!
>!1!hour!
≤!3!hrs!
of!continuous!
gambling!
!
>!3!hrs!
of!continuous!
gambling!
0!
2.5!
5!
7.5!
10!
!
!
!
!
JC "8)$5&!#-!K,$$,$*!)!(1#-,%!
Definition:!The!probability!of!realizing!a!profit!with!each!game.!
!
=5)/&!
0%!
>!0!%!
≤!0,1!%!
>!0,1!%!
≤!0,5!%!
>!0,5!%!
≤!1!%!
>!1!%!
≤!5!%!
>!5!%!
≤!10!%!
>!10!%!
≤!25!
>!25%!
0!
1,25!
2.5!
4!
6!
7.5!
8,75!
10!
!
!
!
!
LC >D),/).,/,%9!
Definition:!Possibility!of!accessing!gambling!opportunities.!
!
=5)/&!
!
Gambling!
opportunities!
within!a!
radius!of!>!
100!km!
!
Gambling!
opportunities!
within!a!
radius!from!
>!25!km!!to!!!
≤!!100!km!
!
!
Gambling!
opportunities!
within!a!
radius!from!
!>!10!km!to!!!
≤!!25!km!!
!
Gambling!
opportunities!
within!a!
radius!from!
>!1!km!!to!!!
≤!!10!km!!
!
Gambling!
opportunities!
within!a!
radius!of!!
≤!!1!km!!
!
Gambling!
opportunities!
at!home!/!
workplace!
0!
2.5!
4!
6!
7.5!
10!
!
!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"!9!"!!
!
!
MC 70/%,(/&!(/)9,$*NO'%)F&!#((#1%0$,%,&'!
Definition:!Opportunity!to!play! several! stakes!at!the!same!time! (e.g.!betting!on!several!
roulette! numbers)! or! to! take! part! in! several! gambling! opportunities! at! the! same! time!
(e.g.!playing!different!slot"machines!at!the!same!time!or!playing!different!online"poker"
tables!on!different!screens!at!the!same!time).!
!
=5)/&'!
no!multiple!playing!
opportunity!
and!no!multiple!stake!
opportunity!
multiple!playing!
opportunities!or!multiple!
stake!opportunities!
multiple!playing!
opportunities!and!multiple!
stake!opportunities!
0!
5!
10!
!
!
!
PC Q)1,)./&!'%)F&!)R#0$%!
Definition:!Extent!to!which!gamblers!can!choose!or!modify!their!stake!amounts!while!
playing.
=5)/&!
!
no!variable!(=!fixed)!!
stake!amount!!
variable!stake,!!
limited!stake!amount!!
variable!stake,!
unlimited!stake!amount!!
0!
5!
10!
!
!
!
SC =&$'#19!(1#405%!4&',*$!
Definition:!Auditory!and!visual!effects.!
!
=5)/&!!
non"existent!
auditory!or!visual!effects!exist!
auditory!and!visual!effects!exist!
0!
5!
10!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"!10!"!!
!
!
2TC @&)1!K,$'!!
Definition:!Results!when!a!gambler!supposes!to!almost!win!(to!miss!the!profit!narrowly;!
a!near!win).!
!
=5)/&!!
non"existent!!
un"intentionally!created,!
occurring!by!chance!
intentionally!created!by!
supplier/!producer,!!
occurring!more!frequently!
than!random!
0!
5!
10!
!
!
Given!that!some!dimensions!may!be!more!important!that!others!in!increasing!the!risk!of!
potential! of! the! gambling! product,! the! experts! were! asked! to! assign! weights! for! each!
parameter!regarding!their!risk!potential.!The!weights!were!also!standardized!between!0!
(of!no!importance)!and!10!(of!very!great!importance).!!
The!overall!risk!potential!of!a!gambling!product!is!obtained!by!multiplying!the!weight!of!
each!dimension!by!the!score!on!that!dimension!and!adding!up!the!weighted!scores!of!all!
ten!dimensions.! Thus!the! range! ASTERIG! is! 0"620,!where! the!maximum! is!obtained! by!
multiplying!the!resulting!individual! points!of!each!dimension! (which! always!range!from!
0"10)!by!the!weight!of!those!dimensions!(which!could!also!range!theoretically!from!0"10,!
but!which!are!fixed!by!the!experts!currently!between!4"8).!Based!on!the!particular!scales!
and! on! the! general! weights! of! dimensions,! the! result! is! a! number! of! points! with! a!
maximum!of!620!points!=!62!(sum!of!the!weights)!x!10!(maximum!scale),!which!can!be!
normalized!to!a!maximum!score9!of!maximum!10!by!dividing!by!62!(i.e.,!620:!62)10.!
The!different!meaning!of!dimensions!of!the!risk!potential!of!each!gambling!product!can!
be!visualized!by!a!scorecard.!Scorecards!are!suitable!for!quantitative!assessments!during!
analysis! of! potentials! and! risks,! for! the! estimation! of! product"! and! performance"ideas!
and!further!problems.!Scorecards!are!suited!for!the!quantitative!evaluation!of!potential!
and!risk!analyses!to!assess!product!and!service!ideas!and!many!other!factors.11!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
9!To!use!scores!respectively!a!scorecard!is!recommended!because!one!factor!(the!weights)!of!the!two!
factors!is!fixed.!The!weights!do!not!vary!from!case!to!case.!A!score!from!maximum!10!means!that!the!risk!
potential!of!addiction!would!be!reached!in!maximum!in!all!dimensions.!!
10!By!divining!the!total!points!–!here!at!the!maximum!=!620!points!–!through!62!(=!sum!of!the!fix!weights)!
the!total!scores!are!getting!normalized!into!a!range!between!0"10.!!
11!Scorecards!have!been!used!e.g.!in!studies!for!structuring!and!supporting!decisions!of!companies.!See!on!
this!topic!Clement,!Peren!(1998).!http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peren%E2%80%93Clement_Index![viewed!
2013"03"17].!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"!11!"!!
!
U,'F!(#%&$%,)/!51,%&1,)!
K&,*8%'!
'5)/&'!
1)$*&!#-!D)/0&26!
Event!frequency!
8!
0!"!10!
0!"!80!
Interval!of!payback!
6!
0!"!10!
0!"!60!
Jackpot!
5!
0!"!10!
0!"!50!
Continuity!of!playing!
8!
0!"!10!
0!"!80!
Chance!of!winning!a!profit!
6!
0!"!10!
0!"!60!
Availability!
7!
0!"!10!
0!"!70!
Multiple!playing"/stake!
opportunities!
6!
0!"!10!
0!"!60!
Variable!stake!amount!
6!
0!"!10!
0!"!30!
Sensory!product!design!
4!
0!"!10!
0!"!40!
Near!wins!
6!
0!"!10!
0!"!60!
V#%)/'!
L6!
T!N!2T!
T!N!L6T!
!
Table!2:!!Approach:!multiplication!of!general!weights!with!individual!scales!
!
!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
12!Weights!multiply!with!the!minimum/maximum!values!of!the!scales.!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"!12!"!!
!
G!!!:;)R(/&
The!following!example!is!completely!fictitious!and!is!simply!presented!to!illustrate!how!
ASTERIG!could!be!used!to!assess! the!risk!potential!of!a!gambling!product.! Assume! that!
there!is!a!game,!which! we!will!call!bet$for$soccer* from!the! also!fictitious!provider!bets$
limited.!!
!
In!our!example,!bet$for$soccer!has!the!following!attributes:!
! In!this!fictitious!national!league!there!are!24!teams!that!play!in!12!matches!in!
different!cities!on!each!Saturday.!!
! Betting!on!all!games!is!allowed.!
! For!each!match,!it!is!allowed!to!bet!that:!(a)!team!A!will!win,!(b)!team!B!will!win!
(c)!there!will!be!a!tie.!It!is!possible!to!bet!all!three!outcomes!at!the!same!time.!
In!theory!the!probability!of!each!outcome!is!1/3!=!0.33!=!33.33%.!But!in!sports"
betting!there!are!always!quotes!which!depend!on!the!voting!of!all!the!players!
(gamblers)!who!bet!on!that!particular!game.!For!example.!50%!of!all!gamblers!
could!bet!for!(a)!that!team!A!wins,!25%!for!(b),!that!team!B!wins,!and!25%!for!(c),!
there!is!a!tie.!The!quotes!could!theoretically!range!between!0%!and!100%,!e.g.!
when!all!gamblers!would!bet!for!(a)!the!advantage!of!team!A!and!nobody!for!the!
alternatives!(b)!and!(c).!
! The!chance!of!winning!a!profit!and!the!amount!of!a!possible!profit!depend!on!the!
quotes.!If!e.g.!50%!of!all!players!bet!that!(a)!team!A!wins,!25%!that!(b)!team!B!
wins!and!25%!that!(c)!there!is!a!tie,!the!quotes!would!be!distributed!"!after!a!10%!
margin!for!the!provider!"!as!follows:!1.8!if!team!A!wins,!3.6!if!team!B!wins!and!3.6!
there!is!a!tie.!The!profits!would!also!be!distributed!in!the!equivalent!relations.!If!
team!A!wins!those!players!(gamblers)!who!bet!on!this!result!will!get!$1.8!for!each!
$!they!bet.!If!the!other!two!alternatives!are!realized,!those!gamblers!would!get!
$3.6!for!each!$!bet.!
! The!minimum!stake!is!$1.!The!maximum!allowed!stake!is!$100!per!each!match.!
So!the!maximum!win!would!be!$100!x!90!(100%!quote!minus!10%!margin!for!the!
provider)!=!$9.000!for!each!match.!If!the!gambler!bets!on!each!of!the!12!games,!
the!maximum!stake!by!this!individual!could!be!a!total!of!$1.200!per!week.!The!
maximum!win!could!be!$9.000!x!12!matches!=!$108.000!per!week.!
! There!is!no!jackpot.!
! On!the!webpage!of!the!provider!only!visual!effects!exist.!There!are!no!auditory!
effects.!Also!all!other!marketing!activities!use!only!visual!activities.!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"!13!"!!
!
!
Based!on!the!description!of!the!fictitious!game*bet$for*soccer!determines!the!following!
scores!would!be!assigned:!
2C :D&$%!-1&E0&$59!
!
Unit!of!time!between!stake,!gambling!result!and!next!stake!opportunity:!>!6!days,!
because!the!matches!run!only!every!Saturday.!Even!considering!that!it!is!possible!to!bet!
on!all!12!matches!every!week,!it!should!be!assumed!that!all!12!stakes!would!be!done!
once!a!week!in!less!than!one!day.!!!
!
"!!=5#1&W!T!
!
!
!
6C 3$%&1D)/!#-!()9.)5F!
Period!of!time!between!gambling!result!and!notification!of!payment!or!actual!receipt!of!
payment:!!≤!5!sec,!because!the!bets!are!run!online!and!the!gambling!result!and!
notification!of!payment!is!given!just!in!time!after!the!soccer!match!finishes.!
!
"!!=5#1&W!2T!
!
!
!
GC H)5F(#%!
An!extraordinary!top!prize!typically!in!the!form!of!a!large!amount!of!money!formed!by!
the!accumulation!of!previous!bets:!!There!is!no!jackpot.!
!
"!!=5#1&W!T!
!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"!14!"!!
!
!
IC "#$%,$0,%9!#-!(/)9,$*!
There!are!maximum!12!possibilities!(=!matches)!per!week,!per!gambling!without!an!
interruption.!If!we!assume!that!all!12!possibilities!are!used!and!that!all!betting!are!done!
in!one!term!(without!any!interruption)!and!one!betting!needs!in!average!approximately!
5!minutes!for!each!match!the!period!of!time!during!which!it!is!possible!to!gamble!
without!interruption!is!maybe!maximum!5min!x!12!=!60!min!=!1!hour.!!
!
"!!=5#1&W!J!
!
!
!
JC "8)$5&!#-!K,$$,$*!)!(1#-,%!
!
The!probability!of! realizing!a! profit! with!each! game!is!on! average!33.33%!and! in!many!
occasions!>!25%.!
!
"!!=5#1&W!2T!
!
!
LC >D),/).,/,%9!
“Bet-for soccer” is accessed online.!Gambling!opportunities!are!generally!at!home!or!at!
the!workplace.!
!
"!!=5#1&W!2T!
!
MC 70/%,(/&!(/)9,$*NO'%)F&!#((#1%0$,%,&'!
There!are!multiple!playing!opportunities!(i.e.,!betting!on!some!or!all!12!matches)!at!the!
same!time!(per!week)!per!player!(gambler)!and!by!using!one!userID.!There!exist!multiple!
(=!12)!stake!opportunities!as!well.!
!
"!!=5#1&W!2T!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"!15!"!!
!
!
PC Q)1,)./&!'%)F&!)R#0$%!
The!stake!that!gamblers!can!choose!is!variable.!The!stake!amount!is!limited!between!$1!
(minimum)!and!$100!per!each!match.!In!total!–!by!betting!on!all!12!matches!–!between!$12!and!
$1.200!per!week.
"!!=5#1&W!J!
!
!
SC =&$'#19!(1#405%!4&',*$!
Visual!effects!exist.!Auditory!effects!non"exist.!!
!
"!!=5#1&W!J!
!
!
2TC @&)1!K,$'!!
A!gambler!could!suppose!to!almost!win!(to!miss!the!profit!narrowly;!a!near!win).!But!in!
this!case!it!is!un"intentionally!created!by!the!supplier/producer.!It!occurs!by!chance.!!
!
"!!=5#1&W!J!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"!16!"!!
!
U,'F!(#%&$%,)/!51,%&1,)!
K&,*8%'!
X-,;Y!
'5#1&!!
XTZ2TY2G!
&;)R(/&2I!
Event!frequency!
8!
0!
0!
Interval!of!payback!
6!
10!
60!
Jackpot!
5!
0!
0!
Continuity!of!playing!
8!
5!
40!
Chance!of!winning!a!profit!
6!
10!
60!
Availability!
7!
10!
70!
Multiple!playing"/stake!
opportunities!
6!
10!
60!
Variable!stake!amount!
6!
5!
30!
Sensory!product!design!
4!
5!
20!
Near!wins!
6!
5!
30!
V#%)/'!
L6!
N!
GMT!
Table!3:!!Approach:!multiplication!of!general!weights!with!individual!scales!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!of!the!fictitious!sport!betting!game!bet$for$soccer!
In!Figure!1!the!corresponding!radar!chart!is!shown.!It!illustrates!the!dimension!and!form!
of! the! expanse! within! the! graphic! product"profile.! Amplitudes! of! certain! dimensions!
become! apparent.15!Figure! 2! shows! the! structure! of! the! responsibilities,! which!
dimensions!account! for! the! risk! potential! of! addiction!in! that! specific! case,!and! which!
dimensions!do!not!appear!to!contribute!to!this!risk!potential.!In!this!example!it!becomes!
apparent!that!in! particular! the!dimensions!“Interval!of! payback”,!“Chance!of!winning! a!
profit”,!“Availability”! as!well! as! “Multiple!playing! and!stake! opportunities”!seem! to! be!
important! referring! to! risk! potential! of! addiction.! On! the! other! hand! the! “Event!
frequency”!does!not!seem!to!initialize!any!risk!potential!at!all.!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
13!These!points!correspond!to!the!arithmetic!mean!of!the!individual!ratings!awarded!by!the!team!of!
experts!which!would!be!involved!to!evaluate!the!risk!potential!of!the!gambling!product!bet$for$soccer,!
which!is!here!fictitiously!assumed.!!
14!Weights!multiply!with!the!scale!in!the!concrete!case.!
15!In!a!radar!or!spider!chart,!the!values!of!the!individual!categories!are!displayed!along!one!axis!starting!at!
the!center!of!the!chart!and!ending!on!the!outer!ring.!This!clarifies!the!variations!of!certain!criteria.!!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"!17!"!!
!
Product(profile(
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Event.frequency
Jac kpot
Continuity.of.pla yi ng
Chanc e.of.winni ng
Ava i l a bi l i ty
Interval.pf.payback
Multi pl e.playi ngD/stake
opportunities
Near .wi ns
Vari a bl e.s ta ke.amount
Sensory.product.design
!
!
Figure!1:!!Radar!chart!showing!the!risk!potential!of!the!fictitious!sport!betting!game!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!bet$for$soccer!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"!18!"!!
!
010 20 30 40 50 60 70
Event.frequency
Jac kpot
Continuity.of.playi ng
Chance.of.winning
Ava i l a bi l i ty
Interval.pf.payback
Multipl e.playi ngD/s take.opportunities
Near.wi ns
Vari ab l e.s take.a mount
Sensory.product.design
Product(profile
!
Figure!2:!!!Bar!chart!showing!the!risk!potential!of!the!fictitious!sport!betting!game!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!bet$for$soccer!
To! analyse! the! dimensions! in! greater! detail! and! compare! them! with! each! other,! it! is!
useful!to!create!a!bar!diagram!in!addition!to!the!spider!chart!(Figure!2).!!
!
In!total,!the!risk!potential!of!potential!of!the!fictitious!sport!betting!game!bet$for$soccer!
is!rated!with!a!score!of!approximately!5.97,!resulting!by!dividing!the!total!score!(370)!by!
62!(Table!2).!
!
If!we!classify!the!total!points!into!five!categories!of! equal! amplitude!for!example16,!the!
results!can!be!seen!to!map!five!categories!of!risk!as!shown!in!table!4.!The!risk!potential!
of!the!fictitious!sport!betting!game!bet$for$soccer!can!thus!be!classified! as! moderate!in!
tendency!to!high.!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
16!Alternatively!it!would!be!possible!to!develop!the!classification!heterogeneous!by!dint!of!a!cluster!
analysis!that!changes!maybe!in!the!course!of!time.!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"!19!"!!
!
U&'0/%!
=5#1&!
U,'F!5)%&*#19!
U,'F!(#%&$%,)/!
1!"!124!
>!0!!"!!≤!2!
A!
lowest!
125!"!248!
>!2!!"!!≤!4!
B!
low!
249!–!372!
>!4!!"!≤!6!
C!
moderate!
373!"!496!
>!6!!"!!≤!8!
D!
high!
497!"!620!
>!8!!"!!≤!10!
E!
highest!
Table!4:!!!!Risk!potential!classification!of!gambling!products*
!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"!20!"!!
!
IC!!!"#$5/0',#$!)$4!-0%01&!4,1&5%,#$'!
The!present!Assessment!Tool!to!Measure!and!Evaluate!the!Risk!Potential!of!Gambling!Products!
(ASTERIG)! measures! the! possible! dimensions! of! risk! potential! of! gambling! products! on!
the! basis! of! numeric! scores.! In! doing! so,! it! also! allows! a! comparison! to! be! drawn!
between!the!addiction!potentials!of!different!gambling!products.!Furthermore,!the!tool!
highlights!where!the!specific!risk!potential!of!each!specific!gambling!product!lie.!!
!
An! indication! of! the! classification! of! the! risk! potential! of! gambling! products! could! be!
placed! on! vouchers,! in! gambling! locations! or! in! the! computer! screen! when! an! online!
game!is!started,!for!example.!A!visual!display!that!shows!the!risk!potential!when!starting!
to! use! a! gambling! product! could! help! an! individual! visualize! the! possible! risk! for!
becoming! addicted.! Furthermore! the! individual! would! be! able! to! assess! the! risk!
potential!of!different!gambling!products!and!to!compare!their!risk!potentials!with!each!
other.!ASTERIG!could!not!only!be!used!for!existing!gambling!products,!also!new!ones!can!
be!assessed!concerning!their!risk!potential.17!
!
In!summary,!although!gambling!is!a!popular!pastime!that!brings! joy! and!entertainment!
to!many!adults,!it! is!associated!with!risk! for! the!development!of!maladaptive! gambling!
behaviors,! and! this! risk! may! depend,! at! least! in! part,! on! the! characteristics! of! the!
gambling!product.! The! gambling!product! is! only!one! aspect!contributing! to! the!risk! of!
gambling! disorders! in! the! context! of! a! complex! interaction! and! a! bio"psycho"social!
context.! We! hope! that! the! development! of! ASTERIG! may! help! provide! a! systematic,!
objective! way! to! assess! this! risk! potential! of! gambling! products! and! contribute! to!
develop!policies!that!balance!access!to!gambling!for!entertainment!with!minimizing!the!
risk!of!gambling!disorders.!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
17!Cp.!Peren!(2011)!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"!21!"!!
!
!
J!!!!U&-&1&$5&'!
Clement,!R.,!Goudriaan,!A.E.,!Holst,!R.J.,!Molinaro,!S.,!Moersen,!C.,!Nilsson,!T.,!Parke,!A.,!
Peren,!F.W.,!Rebeggiani,!L.,!Stoever,!H.,!Terlau,!W.,!Wilhelm,!M.!(2012):!Measuring!
and!Evaluating!the!Potential!Addiction!Risk!of!the!Online!Poker!Game!Texas!
Hold'em!No!Limit.!In:!Gaming!Law!Review!and!Economics.!Volume:!16!Issue!12.!!
Clement,!R.,!Peren,!F.W.!(1998):!Globale!Standortanalyse,!in:!Harvard!Business!
Manager,!6,!1998,!S.!70!–!77;!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peren%E2%80%93Clement_Index!!
[viewed!2013"03"17].!!
GamGARD!"!Gaming!Assessment!Measure!–!Guidance!about!Responsible!Design;!
http://www.gamgard.com![viewed!2013"03"17].!
Linstone,!H.A.,!Turoff,!M.!(1975):!The!Delphi!Method:!Techniques!and!Applications,!
Reading,!Mass.:!Addison"Wesley.!http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delphi_method!
[viewed!2013"03"17].!
Peren,!F.W.!(2009):!Assessment!Tool!to!measure!and!Evaluate!the!Risk!potential!of!
Gambling!products!–!ASTERIG.!Presentation!at!the!Social!Responsibility!Seminar!of!
the!EL!European!Lotteries!Association,!Barcelona.!
Peren,!F.W.!(2011):!Assessment!Tool!to!Measure!and!Evaluate!the!Risk!Potential!of!
Gambling!Products:!ASTERIG,!in:!The!Journal!of!Gambling!Business!and!Economics,!
2011,!Vol.!5,!No.!2,!pp!54"66.!!
Product!Evaluation!Method!for!Reducing!Potential!Hazards!(Finland);!
http://www.veikkaus.fi![viewed!2013"03"17].!
Playscan!(Sweden);!http://www.spelinstitutet.se![viewed!2013"03"17].!
... A játékok és legfőképpen azok struktúrájának tervezésekor a szervezők számos pszichológiai eredményre támaszkodva alakíthatják ki a legvonzóbbak, legcsábítóbbnak tűnő szolgáltatásaikat (Körmendi -Kurucz, 2010;Bilgihan et al., 2016). A szerencsejátékok továbbá nem pusztán egyéni, hanem -negatív externális hatásukat figyelembe véve -aggreált, társadalmi szinten is magas kockázatokkal járnak (Tessényi, 2015), sőt amennyiben a kérdést tovább szűkítjük, fókuszba kerül a szerencsejáték-iparág játékfüggőségen keresztül kifejtett társadalmi hatása is (Hancock et al., 2014), amely átvezet e speciális felelősséggel kapcsolatos kutatás rövid áttekintésének területére. ...
Article
Full-text available
A tanulmány a felnőtt magyar lakosság játékokkal, játszással kapcsolatos attitűdjének bemutatására fókuszál. A vizsgálat alapja egy 2000 fős, felnőtt lakosságra nézve reprezentatív, 2016. év végén készített online megkérdezés volt, amely egy nagymintás, több mint 8000 fős, 4 modulból álló, a magyar nemzeti szerencsejáték-szervező számára készült keretkutatás része. A másodelemzés rámutatott arra, hogy a játékról a válaszadóknak spontán módon a szórakozás jutott eszébe elsőként, amelyet elsősorban a gyerekekhez, a kikapcsolódáshoz és a társasjátékokhoz kötnek a legtöbben. A szociális tanulás sémáit idézi az az eredmény, hogy a legtöbben családosokat tudják leginkább és az időseket legkevésbé elképzelni játék közben. A vizsgálat felfedte a „jó játék” legfontosabb dimenzióit is: egy játék legyen szórakoztató, izgalmas, kikapcsolódást nyújtó, elgondolkodtató, kösse le a figyelmet, sőt fejlesszen is. Miközben a megkérdezettek több mint fele egyetértett azzal, hogy a játék legyen vicces és legyen annak győztese, kevésbé tekintik fontosnak a nyeremény és a szerencse jelenlétét, a legkevesebb említést pedig a fizikai képességek szükségessége és a vesztes jelenléte kapta. Mindezek az eredmények termék- és szolgáltatáskínálatuk optimalizálására késztethetik a legális szervezőket, akiket egyfelől a gyakran alulszabályozott verseny, másfelől az önként vállalt felelős játékszervezési elvek korlátoznak. A kínálati oldal felülvizsgálatának üzenetét hordozza az az eredmény is, amely szerint a legtöbben a mindennapi tevékenységekből, a munkából és a tanulásból hiányolják leginkább a játékosságot.
... Similar to the labels used in the ESRB system (e.g., C, E, T, M, AO; Entertainment Software Rating Board, 2016), risk categories could perhaps be developed depicting the addictive potential of the most popular games. Such attempts can already be seen in the case of gambling products in Germany (Peren, 2011) and in Hungary (Tessényi & Peren, 2015), and many socially responsible gambling companies around the world use licensed software (e.g., GAM-GaRD and Asterig) to assess the riskiness of their gambling products before releasing them on the market (Griffiths, 2012). ...
Article
Full-text available
Background and aims: Empirical research into problematic video game playing suggests that overuse might cause functional and psychological impairments for a minority of gamers. Therefore, the need for regulation in the case of video games (whether governmental or self-imposed) has arisen but has only been implemented in a few countries around the world, and predominantly in Asia. This paper provides a systematic review of current and potential policies addressing problematic gaming. Methods: After conducting a systematic search in the areas of prevention, treatment, and policy measures relating to problematic Internet and video game use, papers were selected that targeted problematic gaming policies (N = 12; six in English and six in Korean). These papers served as the basis of this review. Results: Policies were classified into three major groups: (i) policy measures limiting availability of video games (e.g., shutdown policy, fatigue system, and parental controls), (ii) measures aiming to reduce risk and harm (e.g., warning messages), and (iii) measures taken to provide help services for gamers. Beyond the attempt to classify the current and potential policy measures, the authors also tried to evaluate their efficiency theoretically and (if data were available) empirically. Discussion and conclusions: Overall, it appears that although several steps have been taken to address problematic video game playing, most of these steps were not as effective as expected, or had not been evaluated empirically for efficacy. The reason for this may lie in the fact that the policies outlined only addressed or influenced specific aspects of the problem instead of using a more integrative approach.
Assessment Tool to measure and Evaluate the Risk potential of Gambling products -ASTERIG. Presentation at the Social Responsibility Seminar of the EL European Lotteries Association
  • F W Peren
Peren, F.W. (2009): Assessment Tool to measure and Evaluate the Risk potential of Gambling products -ASTERIG. Presentation at the Social Responsibility Seminar of the EL European Lotteries Association, Barcelona.