ArticlePDF Available

Abstract

Modern society has easy access to a vast informational database. The pursuit of sustainable green and healthy lifestyle leads to a series of food choices. Therefore, it is of importance to provide reliable, comprehensive and up-to-date information about food content including both nutritional and antinutritional elements. Nutrients are associated with positive effects on human health. Antinutrients, on the other hand, are far less popular for the contemporary man. They are highly bioactive, capable of deleterious effects as well as some beneficial health effects in man, and vastly available in plant-based foods. These compounds are of natural or synthetic origin, interfere with the absorption of nutrients, and can be responsible for some mischievous effects related to the nutrient absorption. Some of the common symptoms exhibited by a large amount of antinutrients in the body can be nausea, bloating, headaches, rashes, nutritional deficiencies, etc . Phytates, oxalates, and lectins are few of the well-known antinutrients. Science has acknowledged several ways in order to alter the negative influence antinutrients exhibiting on human health. Mechanical, thermal and biochemical approaches act synergistically to provide food with lower antinutritional levels. The purpose of this review was to synthesize the availability of antinutrients, clear their effect on the human body, and commemorate possible paths to disable them. This review provides links to the available literature as well as enables a systematic view of the recently published research on the topic of plant-based antinutrients.
1874-0707/19 Send Orders for Reprints to reprints@benthamscience.net
68
DOI: 10.2174/1874070701913010068, 2019, 13, 68-76
The Open Biotechnology Journal
Content list available at: https://openbiotechnologyjournal.com
REVIEW ARTICLE
Antinutrients in Plant-based Foods: A Review
Aneta Popova1 and Dasha Mihaylova2,*
1Department of Catering and Tourism, University of Food Technologies, 26 Maritza Blvd., 4002, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
2Department of Biotechnology, University of Food Technologies, 26 Maritza Blvd., 4002, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
Abstract: Modern society has easy access to a vast informational database. The pursuit of sustainable green and healthy lifestyle leads to a series
of food choices. Therefore, it is of importance to provide reliable, comprehensive and up-to-date information about food content including both
nutritional and antinutritional elements.
Nutrients are associated with positive effects on human health. Antinutrients, on the other hand, are far less popular for the contemporary man.
They are highly bioactive, capable of deleterious effects as well as some beneficial health effects in man, and vastly available in plant-based foods.
These compounds are of natural or synthetic origin, interfere with the absorption of nutrients, and can be responsible for some mischievous effects
related to the nutrient absorption. Some of the common symptoms exhibited by a large amount of antinutrients in the body can be nausea, bloating,
headaches, rashes, nutritional deficiencies, etc. Phytates, oxalates, and lectins are few of the well-known antinutrients.
Science has acknowledged several ways in order to alter the negative influence antinutrients exhibiting on human health. Mechanical, thermal and
biochemical approaches act synergistically to provide food with lower antinutritional levels.
The purpose of this review was to synthesize the availability of antinutrients, clear their effect on the human body, and commemorate possible
paths to disable them. This review provides links to the available literature as well as enables a systematic view of the recently published research
on the topic of plant-based antinutrients.
Keywords: Antinutritional factors, Plant-based foods, Beneficial effect, Antinutrients, Food content , Biochemical approaches .
Article History Received: March 08, 2019 Revised: May 22, 2019 Accepted: June 06, 2019
1. INTRODUCTION
Food is an essential part of people’s lives. Despite the
world produces enough food for everyone, over 800 million
people still go to bed hungry [1]. Furthermore, malnutrition
and hunger-related diseases cause over 60% of deaths [2].
Eliminating hunger and malnutrition is one of the most
fundamental challenges facing humanity [3]. Moreover, food
sufficiency is not the last aspect of importance; food nutritional
quality is of critical demand as well as the effects of the
accepted food portion, in particular. From this point of view,
the topic of the present review antinutrients raises essential
questions about human health and contributes to the under-
standing of what people actually eat and what the possible
resulting effects can be.
Antinutritional factors are primarily associated with
compounds or substances of natural or synthetic origin, which
interfere with the absorption of nutrients, and act to reduce
nutrient intake, digestion, and utilization and may produce
* Address correspondence to this author at the Department of Biotechnology,
University of Food Technologies, 26 Maritza Blvd., 4002, Plovdiv, Bulgaria; Tel:
+359 898 742 397; E-mail: dashamihaylova@yahoo.com
other adverse effects. Antinutrients are frequently related to
plant-based, raw or vegan diets and are naturally synthesized in
plants [4]. Some of the common symptoms exhibited by a large
number of antinutrients in the body can be nausea, bloating,
headaches, rashes, nutritional deficiencies, etc. [5]. On the
other hand, such chemical compounds can be evidently
advantageous to humankind when consumed wisely. In fact,
plants, for their own defense, primarily use antinutrients.
Although people’s sensitivity to antinutrients widely
differs adequate food processing is initially recommended to
reduce antinutritional factors [6]. A person cannot eliminate
antinutrients once they have been introduced to the body.
Eliminating and reintroducing specific foods that contain
antinutrients can clear the correlation between symptoms and
effects on human health. In this regard, the biochemical effects
of the anti-nutritional factors are an object of research interest
[7 - 10] Most of the secondary metabolites, acting as anti-
nutrients, elicit very harmful biological responses, while some
of them are widely applied in nutrition and as pharmaco-
logically-active agents [11, 12].
Antinutrients are found in their highest concentrations in
Antinutrients in Plant-based Foods The Open Biotechnology Journal, 2019, Volume 13 69
grains, beans, legumes and nuts, but can also be found in
leaves, roots and fruits of certain varieties of plants. The major
antinutrients found in plant-based foods are phytates, tannins,
lectins, oxalates, etc. Antinutrients in vegetables, whole grains,
legumes and nuts are a concern only when a person’s diet is
composed exclusively of uncooked plant foods. Oxalate, for
instance, prevents calcium from being absorbed in the body by
binding with it [13]. Raw spinach, kale, broccoli and soybeans
usually contain oxalates [14]. When consuming excessive
tannins, which are associated with tea, wine, some fruit, and
chocolate, enzymes responsible for protein absorption may be
inactivated. Phytates are present in grains, nuts and seeds,
while peppers, eggplants, and tomatoes contain lectins.
Phytates consumption may lead a lower mineral absorption and
lectins are able to cause various reactions to the body [15].
Saponins, on the other hand, have been linked to red blood
cells damaging, enzyme inhibition and thyroid function
intervention [16].
There are several approaches to oppose antinutritional
factors. Modern biotechnology`s techniques could reduce the
level of certain allergens and antinutrients in food. Genome
editing biotechnology can create mutations and substitutions in
plant and other eukaryotic cells based on nuclease-based forms
of engineering such as the TALENS (Transcription Activator-
Like Effector Nucleases) or the CRISPR (Clustered Regularly
Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats)/CRISPR-Associated
Systems (CAS) [17, 18]. Providing an enhanced level of
prebiotic in the body can positively influence the effects of
antinutrients [19]. A classic approach to remove antinutrients is
to treat the product thermally, use methods such as extrusion,
autoclaving, hydrotechniques, enzymatic and harvest treat-
ments, etc. [20].
The nutritional value of foods strongly depends on their
nutritional and antinutritional composition. This review was
designed to synthesize the availability of antinutrients, clear
their effect on the human body, and commemorate possible
paths to disable them.
2. ANTINUTRIENTS IN PLANT-BASED FOODS
2.1. Lectins
Lectins, particularly abundant in plants, are proteins or
glycoproteins of non-immune origin. They have the ability to
bind, without modifying, to either carbohydrates or glyco-
conjugates (glycoproteins, glycolipids, polysaccharides). They
can successfully recognize animal cell carbohydrates, which
corresponds to the Latin derivation of the word legere meaning
to select [21]. Lectins have a variety of roles. They can bypass
human defense system and travel all over the body causing
diseases (i.e. Crohn’s disease, Coeliac-Sprue, colitis, etc.) by
breaking down the surface of the small intestine [22]. When
large quantities of lectins are introduced in the body, the gut
wall develops holes, and intestinal permeability, causing the
leaky gut syndrome. Lectins can make cells act as if they have
been stimulated by insulin or cause the insulin release by the
pancreas. Lectins can also cause autoimmune diseases by
presenting wrong immune system codes and stimulating the
growth of some white blood cells [23, 24]. This may possibly
lead to cancer but lectins have not yet been recognized as
cancer causing.
Not all variety of lectins are toxic or responsible for
intestinal damage. Lectins can be found in plant species such as
wheat, beans, quinoa, peas, etc. [25]. As grains are a common
part of the birds’ diet, it has been found that birds themselves
are resistant to grains lectins [26]. Acne, inflammation,
migraines or joint pains can be caused by the consumption of
lectins [27]. Lectins are usually found in the hull so choosing
white rice can lower the lectin intake. Heating plant sources in
the process of cooking can significantly lower the amount of
lectins in them. White potatoes, for instance, have a higher
lectin content compared to sweet potatoes [28]. Almonds are
also a richer lectin source than peanuts [29].
2.2. Trypsin Inhibitors
Trypsin inhibitors occur in a wide range of foods like
chickpeas, soybeans, red kidney beans, adzuki beans, mung
beans and other representatives of the Leguminoseae,
Solanaceae, and Gramineae families [30]. Ten percent of the
world’s dietary protein is derived from grain legumes [31].
Trypsin inhibitors redound to the loss of trypsin and chymo-
trypsin in the gut, thus preventing protein digestion. Excess
trypsin synthesis and burden on sulfur-containing amino acids
in requirement of the body are due to the release of chole-
cystokinin triggered by trypsin inhibitors [32].
2.3. Alpha-amylase Inhibitors
Inhibition of α-amylase is considered a strategy for the
treatment of disorders in carbohydrate uptake, by reducing
insulin levels, as well as, dental caries and periodontal diseases
[33]. Amylase inhibitors are substances that bind to alpha
amylases making them inactive [34]. Two roles of α-amylase
inhibitors have been identified. The primary function of
inhibitors is protecting the seed against microorganisms and
pests, and the other function is the inhibition of the endogenous
α-amylase [35]. However, the instability of this inhibitor under
the conditions of the gastrointestinal tract and being a very
heat-liable constituent results in its failure to be used as starch
blocker [36]. It is used to control human diabetes type two [37]
and finds several applications in the food industry [38, 39].
2.4. Protease Inhibitors
Proteases are key cell-process-regulation enzymes that are
found in all cells and tissues. Protease inhibitors are commonly
present in raw cereals and legumes, especially soybean.
Protease inhibitors bind to their target proteins reversibly or
irreversibly. Growth inhibition, pancreatic hypertrophy [40],
and poor food utilization [41] are associated with protease
inhibitors’ antinutrient activity. Exopeptidases remove amino
acids from the C- or N-terminus, whereas endopeptidases are
capable of cleaving peptides within the molecule [42]. Grain
eating birds have evolved digestive enzymes that are resistant
to grain protease inhibitors [26]. In human volunteers and in
animal experiments, high levels of protease inhibitors lead to
an increased secretion of digestive enzymes by the pancreas
[43].
70 The Open Biotechnology Journal, 2019, Volume 13 Popova and Mihaylova
Table 1. Antinutrients in different foods [29, 68 - 80].
Source Type Amount
Legumes (soya, lentils, chick peas, peanuts,
beans)
Phytic acid
Saponins
Cyanide
Tannins
Trypsin inhibitor
Oxalates
386-714 mg/100g
106-170 mg/100g
2-200 mg/100g
1.8-18 mg/g
6.7 mg/100g
8 mg/kg
Grains (wheat, barley, rye, oat, millet, corn,
spelt, kamut, sorgho)
Phytic acid
Oxalates
50-74 mg/g
35-270 mg/100g
Pseudo-grains: quinoa, amaranth, wheat,
buckwheat, teff
Phytic acid
Lectins
Saponins
Goitrogens
0.5-7.3 g/100g
0.04-2.14 ppm
Nuts: almonds, hazelnut, cashew, pignola,
pistachio, brazil nuts, walnuts, macadamia,
etc.
Phytic acid
Lectins
Oxalates
150-9400 mg/100g
37-144 μg/g
40-490 mg/100g
Seeds: sesame, flaxseed, poppy seed,
sunflower, pumpkin
Phytic acid
Alpha-amylase inhibitor
Cyanide
1-10.7 g/100g
0.251 mg/mL
140-370 ppm
Tubers: carrot, sweet potato, Jerusalem
artichoke, manioc (or tapioca), yam
Oxalates
Tannins
Phytates
0.4-2.3 mg/100g
4.18-6.72 mg/100g
0.06-0.08 mg/100g
Nighshades: potato, tomato, eggplant,
pepper
Phytic acid
Tannins
Saponins
Cyanide
0.82-4.48 mg/100g
0.19 mg/100g
0.16-0.25 mg/100g
1.6-10.5 mg/100g
Fig. (1). Structure of some antinutrient substances.
Antinutrients in Plant-based Foods The Open Biotechnology Journal, 2019, Volume 13 71
2.5. Tannins
Plant tannins are a major group of antioxidant polyphenols
found in food and beverages that attracts research interest with
its multifunctional properties to human health. Tannins are
oligomers of flavan-3-ols and flavan-3, 4-diols that are
concentrated in the bran fraction of legumes [44]. Grapes and
green tea are rich in this water-soluble polyphenol [45].
Tannins exhibit antinutritional properties by impairing the
digestion of various nutrients and preventing the body from
absorbing beneficial bioavailable substances [46]. Tannins can
also bind and shrink proteins. Tannin-protein complexes may
cause digestive enzymes inactivation and protein digestibility
reduction caused by protein substrate and ionisable iron
interaction [47].
2.6. Phytates
Phytates occur in several vegetable products. Seeds, grains,
nuts and legumes store phosphorus as phytic acid in their husks
in the form of phytin or phytate salt. Their presence may affect
bioavailability of minerals, solubility, functionality and diges-
tibility of proteins and carbohydrates [41]. Phytic acid is most
concentrated in the bran of grains [48]. In legumes, phytic acid
is found in the cotyledon layer and can be removed prior to
consumption [49]. The digestive enzyme phytase can unlocked
the phosphorus stored as phytic acid. In the absence of phytase,
phytic acid can impede the absorption of other minerals like
iron, zinc, magnesium and calcium by binding to them [50].
This results in highly insoluble salts that are poorly absorbed
by the gastrointestinal tract leading to lower bioavailability of
minerals. Phytates also inhibit digestive enzymes like pepsin,
trypsin and amylase [51].
2.7. Goitrogens
Hypothyroidism is increasing daily worldwide as the
thyroid gland is highly sensitive to stress and environmental
stimuli [52]. Goitrogens interfere with iodine uptake and thus,
affect thyroid function. Vegetables from the genus Brassica i.e.
broccoli, cabbage, cauliflower, Brussels sprouts and kale are
some of the goitrogen rich foods [53]. The consumption of
cruciferous vegetables affects triiodothyronine (T3) and thy-
roxine (T4) levels by causing hypothyroidism [54]. Concomi-
tant factors can be insufficient water consumption and protein
malnutrition [55].
2.8. Raffinose Oligosaccharides
Raffinose, stachyose and verbascose, all part of the
Raffinose Family Oligosaccharides (RFOs), are synthesized
from sucrose. Non-digestible oligosaccarides have a prebiotic
effect in the lower intestine by promoting the growth of
Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus that inhibit pathogenic
growth [56]. The absence of appropriate enzyme activity to
hydrolyse RFOs (α-galactosidase) leads to the inability of
humans and to digest RFOs an allow them to pass through the
intestinal wall intact [51, 57]. A correlation between legumes
consumption and the likelihood of intestinal discomfort has
been drawn leading to symptoms like burping, abdominal pain,
and bloating [57]. The presence of RFO in the daily food intake
can interfere with the digestion nutrients [58]. RFO can reduce
metabolizable energy and protein utilization [59]. Research has
shown that RFO removal has improved the digestion of all
amino acids increasing the overall nutritional value of the lupin
diet [60].
2.9. Saponins
Some saponins (steroid or triterpene glycoside compounds)
can be used for food while others are toxic. Saponins with a
bitter taste are toxic in high concentrations and can affect
nutrient absorption by inhibiting enzymes (metabolic and
digestive) as well as by binding with nutrients such as zinc.
Saponins are naturally occurring substances with various
biological effects. In the presence of cholesterol, saponins
exhibit strong hypocholesterolemic effect [61]. They can also
lead to hypoglycemia [62] or impair the protein digestion,
uptake vitamins and minerals in the gut, as well as lead to the
development of a leaky gut [63].
2.10. Oxalates
Some organic acids can have antinutritional factors. Oxalic
acid can form soluble (potassium and sodium) or insoluble
(calcium, magnesium, iron) salts or esters called oxalates that
are commonly found in plants i.e. leafy vegetables or syn-
thesized in the body [64]. Insoluble salts cannot be processed
out of the urinary tract once processed through the digestive
system. Calcium oxalate can have a deleterious effect on
human nutrition and health by accumulating kidney stones
[65]. Cruciferous vegetables (kale, radishes, cauliflower,
broccoli), as well as chard, spinach, parsley, beets, rhubarb,
black pepper, chocolate, nuts, berries (blueberries, black-
berries) and beans are some of the foods with high amounts of
oxalates [66]. Most people can induct normal amounts of
oxalate rich foods, while people with certain conditions, such
as enteric and primary hyperoxaluria, need to lower their
oxalate intake. In sensitive people, even small amounts of
oxalates can result in burning in the eyes, ears, mouth, and
throat; large amounts may cause abdominal pain, muscle
weakness, nausea, and diarrhea [67].
Table 1 is revealing some food sources with the typical
antinutrients contained in them as well as the amounts
variables.
2.11. Exorphins
The alcohol-soluble proteins (proalimins) of cereal grains
and dairy products called gliadins can be further degraded to a
collection of opioid-like polypeptides named exorphins in the
gastrointestinal tract [81]. Behavioral traits such as spon-
taneous behavior, memory, and pain perception can be affected
by the bioactivity of food-derived exorphins [82]. Exorphins
can also influence gastric emptying and intestinal transit by
increasing its time [83]. The digestion of milk produces alpha-
casein-derived exorphins [84]. Recent research suggests that
epigenetic effects of milk-derived opiate peptides may
contribute to gastrointestinal dysfunction and inflam-mation in
sensitive individuals [85].
Fig. (1) pinpoints some of the widely speard antinutrients
in plant-based foods.
72 The Open Biotechnology Journal, 2019, Volume 13 Popova and Mihaylova
2.12. Contextual Antinutrients
Some supplements or foods rich in certain nutrients can
create reactions of an antinutrient nature. For instance,
calcium-rich foods can impede iron absorption. There is also a
mutual antagonism between zinc and copper during the
absorption process, taking place in/on the intestinal epithelium
[86]. Research literature suggests that phytosterols [87] and
phospholipids [88] may reduce cholesterol absorption when
added to nonfat foods. Some foods can interfere with
medication absorption [89]. The most well publicized food-
drug interaction is that of grapefruit and a variety of drugs.
Bergamottin found in grapefruit juice inactivates drug-
metabolizing enzymes. This is the reason why food interaction
warnings are listed on some medical labels. Studies have found
that resveratrol, found in red wine and peanuts, inhibits platelet
aggregation, and high intakes could increase the risk of
bleeding when consumed with anticoagulant drugs [90].
Canadian researchers have documented that black tea was a
more powerful enzyme inhibitor than single-ingredient herbal
teas (St. John’s Wort, feverfew, cat’s claw, etc.) [91]. Another
well-known food-drug interaction is that of foods containing
tyramine (chocolate, beer, wine, avocados, etc.) and mono-
amine oxidase inhibitors (type of antidepressant) [92]. The
most medically consequential food-drug interaction is that of
vitamin K-rich foods (e.g. broccoli, spinach) and Coumadin, an
anticoagulant prescribed to thin the blood and prevent clots
[93].
3. ANTINUTRIENTS AND HUMAN HEALTH
While antinutrients can be problematic, some may also
provide health benefits. The consumers should be aware of any
possible effect whether beneficial and/or negative. Moreover,
concentration-dependent effects must be considered. Data may
be manipulated in respect of health related advantages so that
chronic diseases management becomes possible [32].
Antinutrients are valuable active ingredients in food and
drinks. When used at low levels, phytic acid, lectins and
phenolic compounds as well as enzyme inhibitors and saponins
have been shown to reduce blood glucose and/or plasma chol-
esterol and triacylglycerols. Furtermore, saponins are reported
to act effectively in maintaining liver function, preventing
steoporosis as well as platelet agglutination [94]. Meanwhile,
phenolic compounds from plant sources, phytic acid, protease
inhibitors, saponins, lignans and phytoestrogens have been
demonstrated to reduce cancer risks. Another group of anti-
nutrient compounds, like tannins, were found to possess
possible antiviral [95], antibacterial [96] and antiparasitic
effects [97].
Some compounds such as phytoestrogens and lignans have
also been linked to induction of infertility in humans. There-
fore, it is prudent to examine all aspects of food antinutrients,
including their potential health benefits and methods of
analyses [32].
The above mentioned implies that antinutrients could be
valuable tools for managing various diseases. They might not
always be harmful even though they lack nutritional value.
What is most important is focusing on dosage intake in order to
find the balance between beneficial and hazardous effects of
plant bioactives and antinutrients, in addition to the chemical
structure, time of exposure and interaction with other dietary
components. Many factors influence their activity. They can
both be considered as antinutritional factors with negative
effects or non-nutritive compounds with positive health effects.
Consumers’ awareness is crucial especially when abnormal
health conditions are established.
4. DISABLING ANTINUTRIENTS
Removing undesirable food components is essential to
their quality improvement. Different techniques i.e. soaking,
cooking, fermentation, radiation, germination and chemical
treatment can come in as handy instruments for antinutritional
disabling [98, 99]. The combination of several of the above-
mentioned methods may be more effective in removing anti-
nutrients than using a sole technique.
Soaking: Soaking can be seen as one of the easiest
physical processes to remove soluble antinutritional factors.
Soaking in distilled water, 1% NaHCO3 and mixed salt solu-
tions reduced total phenols, ortho-dihydroxyphenols, tannins
and phytates by 33, 41, 35 and 21 percentages respectively
[100]. Soaking decreased the total protein, soluble sugar and
tannins, in soybean flour [101]. Soaking and sprouting grains,
nuts, seeds, and beans are an excellent way to deactivate
enzyme inhibitors [102]. However, lectin is not affected by this
method of deactivation.
Fermentation: Fermenting assorted grain flour with L.
acidophilus at 37°C for 24 h led to the reduction of phytic acid
and polyphenol content [103]. Recent research has shown a
general noticeable reduction in the entire antinutrient properties
of soybean for a day of fermentation [104]. Ojokoh et al. [105]
have studied the effect of fermentation on the antinutritional
composition of breadfruit and cowpea flours showing a
significant reduction of the hydrogen cyanide, oxalate and
phytate content. Fermentation is reported to increase the
protein content in chickpea by 13% and decrease the content of
phytic acid by 45% [106]. Adeyemo et al. [107] assessed the
effects of fermentation of sorghum at 0, 72 and 120 hours on
trypsin inhibitor, protease inhibitor, phytate and tannin. A
significant reduction of trypsin inhibitor (69%); protease
inhibitor (30%); phytate (60%) and tannin (72%) was observed
at 120 h with L. plantarum used as starter culture. On the other
hand, L. brevis as starter appeared to be effective at 120h with
58% reduction of trypsin inhibitor; 40% of protease inhibitor;
70% of phytate and 56% of tannin.
Sprouting (Germination): Germination is one of the most
effective processes for the reduction of anti-nutritive com-
pounds i.e. phytate levels [108]. The trypsin inhibitor activity,
amylase inhibitor activity and phytate content of soy-bean
variety MACS-13 decreased with sprouting [109]. Kanensi et
al. [110] report a lower antinutrient level of germi-nated
amaranth seeds. The levels of tannins and phytate were
insignificant. To overcome the antinutritional levels, Kajla et
al. [111] also adopted the germination process in flax seeds.
Other authors reaffirm that germination leads to increased
nutritional and decreased anti-nutrients content in plant-based
foods [112].
Heating: Cooking whole grains, beans and vegetables can
Antinutrients in Plant-based Foods The Open Biotechnology Journal, 2019, Volume 13 73
reduce certain antinutrients such as phytic acid, tannins, and
oxalic acid. Protease inhibitors are easily denatured by heat
treatment due to their protein nature [113]. Research has shown
that antinutrient levels are reduced with controlled heating at a
temperature less than boiling for at least 15 minutes [114].
Autoclaving can also drastically decrease the content of
tannins, phytic acid, hydrogen cyanide, trypsin inhibitors and
oligosaccharides [6]. Cooking sweet potato leaves with lemon
reduced polyphenols with 56% and lowered the oxalate levels
[115]. Boiling bambara groundnut seeds for a period of 60 min
significantly lowers the raffinose content and improves protein
digestibility of the seeds [116].
Gamma radiation: Gamma radiation appeared to be a
good procedure to decrease the level of trypsin inhibitor, phytic
acid and oligosaccharides of broad bean between 5 and 10%
[117]. However, Hassan et al. [118] documented that a 2 kGy
dose had no significant change in the tannin content of two
maize cultivars. Similar observations were reported by El-
Niely [119] and Fombang et al. [120]. Low doses of gamma
irradiation (0.5 and 1.0 kGy) Faba bean seeds significantly
reduced antinutritional factors such as tannin and phytic acid
[121]. Gamma radiation can be applied as a safe postharvest
method to minimize antinutrients of millet grains [122].
Genomic technology: Genomic resources can be used as
pathways to RNA interference and removing of antinutrient
factors, but this technology has yet to be tried out in vivo [123].
Shukla et al. [124] designed zinc-finger nucleases construct to
mutate the IPK1 gene in maze, one of the phytic acid
biosynthesis genes because corn contains high levels of
phosphorus stored in the form of phytic acid. Genome editing
technology can increase crop quality but there is an ongoing
argument about genetically modified organisms’ safety [125].
CONCLUSION
Antinutritional factors are widespread food compounds
that are especially challenging for those choosing a
predominantly plant-based diet i.e. vegan, vegetarians, etc.
Antinutrients can exhibit beneficial health effects if present in
small amounts or cause nutrient deficiencies. Uninformed
consumers may deal with some misleading information when
the latter is not sufficiently available. Antinutrients may induce
their undesirable effects when consumed above their upper
limit. Harmful effects can also be due to antinutritional
breakdown products. Thus, the presence of lectins, tannins,
alkaloids, and saponins, goitrogens, inhibitors, etc. in foods
may induce various reactions when the consumer is presented
with little knowledge related to the environmental influence on
the detoxification capacity of the human organism. Classic
approaches and modern agricultural biotechnological programs
can serve as antinutritional removal tools. However, health risk
factors can be avoided when a daily sustainable diet lying on a
sound scientific basis is introduced.
CONSENT FOR PUBLICATION
Not applicable.
FUNDING
None.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare no conflict of interest, financial or
otherwise.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Declared none.
REFERENCES
FAO. IFAD and WFP 2015.[1]
UNICEF. 2007. The State of the World’s Children. Women and[2]
Children The Double Dividend of Gender Equality
Lomborg B, Ed. Global Crises, Global Solutions. Cambridge:[3]
Cambridge University Press 2004.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511492624]
Gemede HF, Ratta N. Antinutritional factors in plant foods: potential[4]
health benefits and adverse effects. Int J Nutr Food Sci 2014; 3(4):
284-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnfs.20140304.18]
Essack H, Odhav B, Mellem JJ. Screening of traditional South African[5]
leafy vegetables for selected anti-nutrient factors before and after
processing. Food Sci Technol 2017; 3: 462-1.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-457x.20416]
Soetan K, Oyewole O. The need for adequate processing to reduce the[6]
anti-nutritional factors in plants used as human foods and animal
feeds: A review. Afr J Food Sci 2009; 3(9): 223-32.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/08039489709090718].
Cheeke PR, Shull LR. Natural toxicants in feeds and livestock. West[7]
Port, Connecticut: AVI Publishing Inc. 1985.
Aletor VA. Allelochemicals in plant foods and feedingstuffs: 1.[8]
Nutritional, biochemical and physiopathological aspects in animal
production. Vet Hum Toxicol 1993; 35(1): 57-67.
[PMID: 8434459]
Osagie AU. 1998.Antinutritional factors.[9]
Fu PP, Xia Q, Lin G, Chou MW. Genotoxic pyrrolizidine alkaloids-[10]
mechanisms leading to DNA adduct formation and tumorigenicity. Int
J Mol Sci 2002; 3: 948-64.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/i3090948]
Oakenfull D, Sidhu GS. Saponins: In Toxicants of plant origin, Vol. II,[11]
Glycosides. In: Florida: CRC. Press Inc 1989; p. 97.
Soetan KO. Pharmacological and other beneficial effects of[12]
antinutriional factors in plants. –A review. Afr J Biotechnol 2008;
7(25): 4713-21. [https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB08.024].
Jiru K, Urga K. Ethiop. Forms and contents of oxalate and calcium in[13]
some vegetables in Ethiopia. J Health Dev 1995; 9(1): 13-8.
Savage G, Klunklin W. Oxalates are found in many different european[14]
and asian foods - effects of cooking and processing. J Food Res 2018;
7(3)
[http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/jfr.v7n3p76]
Gupta RK, Gangoliya SS, Singh NK. Reduction of phytic acid and[15]
enhancement of bioavailable micronutrients in food grains. J Food Sci
Technol 2015; 52(2): 676-84.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13197-013-0978-y] [PMID: 25694676]
Fan Y, Guo DY, Song Q, Li T. Effect of total saponin of aralia[16]
taibaiensis on proliferation of leukemia cells. Zhong Yao Cai 2013;
36(4): 604-7.
[PMID: 24134011]
Gaj T, Gersbach CA, Barbas CF III, Barbas CF. ZFN, TALEN, and[17]
CRISPR/Cas-based methods for genome engineering. Trends
Biotechnol 2013; 31(7): 397-405.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2013.04.004] [PMID: 23664777]
Jankele R, Svoboda P. TAL effectors: tools for DNA targeting. Brief[18]
Funct Genomics 2014; 13(5): 409-19.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bfgp/elu013] [PMID: 24907364]
Gibson RS, Perlas L, Hotz C. Improving the bioavailability of[19]
nutrients in plant foods at the household level. Proc Nutr Soc 2006;
65(2): 160-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/PNS2006489] [PMID: 16672077]
Muzquiz M, Hill GD, Cuadrado C, Pedrosa MM, Burbano C. Recent[20]
advances of research in antinutritional factors in legume seeds and
oilseeds. Proceedings of the fourth international workshop on
antinutritional factors in legume seeds and oilseeds. Toledo, Spain.
2004.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-524-6]
74 The Open Biotechnology Journal, 2019, Volume 13 Popova and Mihaylova
Boyd WC, Shapleigh E. Specific precipitating activity of plant[21]
agglutinins (lectins). Science 1954; 119(3091): 419.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.119.3091.419] [PMID: 17842730]
Yasuoka T, Sasaki M, Fukunaga T, et al. The effects of lectins on[22]
indomethacin-induced small intestinal ulceration. Int J Exp Pathol
2003; 84(5): 231-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2613.2003.00360.x] [PMID:
14690482]
Karpova IS. Specific interactions between lectins and red blood cells[23]
of Chornobyl cleanup workers as indicator of some late radiation
effects. Exp Oncol 2016; 38(4): 261-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.31768/2312-8852.2016.38(4):261-266] [PMID:
28230832]
Fahmi N, Sharma N, Pandey A, et al. Interactions of lectins in the red[24]
blood cells of oral squamous cell carcinoma patients: A comparative
study. Int J Curr Adv Res 2017; 6(7): 4753-7.
Peumans WJ, Van Damme EJ, Barre A, Rougé P. Classification of[25]
plant lectins in families of structurally and evolutionary related
proteins. Adv Exp Med Biol 2001; 491: 27-54.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1267-7_3] [PMID: 14533788]
Losvik A, Beste L, Mehrabi S, Jonsson L. The protease inhibitor CI2c[26]
gene induced by bird cherry-oat aphid in barley inhibits green peach
aphid fecundity in transgenic arabidopsis. Int J Mol Sci 2017; 18(6):
1317.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms18061317] [PMID: 28632160]
Singh H, Sarathi SP. Insight of lectins-a review. Int J Sci Eng Res[27]
2012; 3(4): 2-9.
Zubcevic N, Suljević D, Muhamed F, Rukavina D. Effects of plant[28]
lectins on human erythrocyte agglutination. Serb J Exp Clin Res 2016;
17(3): 207-13.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/sjecr-2016-0031]
Kumari S. 2018.The Effect of Soaking Almonds and Hazelnuts on[29]
Phytate and Mineral Concentrations http://hdl.handle.net/10523/7938
Tibe O, Amarteifio JO, Njogu RMJ. Trypsin inhibitor activity and[30]
condensed tannin content in bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea
(L.) Verdc) grown in Southern Africa. Appl Sci Environ Manage
2007; 11(2): 159-4.
Klupšaitė D, Juodeikienė G. Legume: composition, protein extraction[31]
and functional properties. A review Chem Technol 2011; 66: 5-12.
Shahidi F. ACS Symposium Series. 1-9.[32]
Sales PM, Souza PM, Simeoni LA, Silveira D. α-Amylase inhibitors:[33]
A review of raw material and isolated compounds from plant source. J
Pharm Pharm Sci 2012; 15(1): 141-83.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.18433/J35S3K] [PMID: 22365095]
Wisessing A, Choowongkomon K. Amylase inhibitors of plants:[34]
structures, functions and applications. Funct Plant Sci Biotechnol
2012; 6: 31-41.
Henry RJ, McKinnon GE, Haak IC, Brennan PS. Use of alpha-amylase[35]
inhibitors to control sprouting. St Paul: Preharvest Sprouting in
Cereals American Association of Cereal Chemists 1992; pp. 232-5.
Tysoe C, Williams LK, Keyzers R, et al. Potent human α-amylase[36]
inhibition by the β-defensin-like protein helianthamide. ACS Cent Sci
2016; 2(3): 154-61.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.5b00399] [PMID: 27066537]
Barrett ML, Udani JK. A proprietary α-amylase inhibitor from white[37]
bean (Phaseolus vulgaris): A review of clinical studies on weight loss
and glycemic control. Nutr J 2011; 1: 10-24.
Iimure T, Takoi K, Kaneko T, et al. Novel prediction method of beer[38]
foam stability using protein Z, barley dimeric α-amylase inhibitor-1
(BDAI-1) and yeast thioredoxin. J Agric Food Chem 2008; 56(18):
8664-71.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf801184k] [PMID: 18710245]
Okada Y, Iimure T, Takoi K, et al. The influence of barley malt[39]
protein modification on beer foam stability and their relationship to the
barley dimeric α-amylase inhibitor-I (BDAI-I) as a possible foam-
promoting protein. J Agric Food Chem 2008; 56(4): 1458-64.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf0724926] [PMID: 18237135]
Adeyemo SM, Onilude AA. Enzymatic reduction of anti-nutritional[40]
factors in fermenting soybeans by lactobacillus plantarum isolates
from fermenting cereals. Niger Food J 2015; 31(2): 84-0.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0189-7241(15)30080-1]
Salunkhe DK, Chavan JK, Kaden SS. Dietary tannins: Consequences[41]
and remedies. Boca Roton, FL: CRC Press 1990; pp. 67-75.
Sakamoto Y, Suzuki Y, Iizuka I, et al. S46 peptidases are the first[42]
exopeptidases to be members of clan PA. Sci Rep 2014; 4: 4977.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep04977] [PMID: 24827749]
Logsdon CD, Ji B. The role of protein synthesis and digestive enzymes[43]
in acinar cell injury. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 10(6):
362-70.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2013.36] [PMID: 23507798]
Ngozi O-OP. Evaluation of tannin, phytate and mineral composition of[44]
different indigenous dishes based on pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo). Int J
Nutr Food Sci 2014; 3(6): 493-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnfs.20140306.11]
Chu X, Guo Y, Xu B, et al. Effects of tannic acid, green tea and red[45]
wine on hERG Channels Expressed in HEK293 Cells. PLoS One
2015; 10(12)e0143797
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143797] [PMID: 26625122]
Hendek Ertop M, Bektaş M. Enhancement of bioavailable[46]
micronutrients and reduction of antinutrients in foods with some
processes. Food Heal 2018; 4(3): 159-5.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3153/FH18016]
Salunkhe DK, Chavan JK, Kadam SS. Dietary tannins: Consequences[47]
and remedies. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press 1990; pp. 150-73.
Wcislo G, Szarlej-Wcislo K. Colorectal cancer prevention by wheat[48]
consumption: A three-valued logic - true, false, or otherwise? In:
Wheat and Rice in Disease Prevention and Health. In: 2014; pp.
91-111.
Nissar J, Ahad T, Naik HR, et al. A review phytic acid: As antinutrient[49]
or nutraceutical. J Pharmacogn Phytochem 2017; 6(6): 1554-60.
Masum Akond ASMG, Crawford H, Berthold J, Talukder ZI, Hossain[50]
K. Minerals (Zn, Fe, Ca and Mg) and antinutrient (Phytic acid)
constituents in common bean. Am J Food Technol 2011; 6(3): 235-43.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/ajft.2011.235.243] [PMID: 29861700]
Kumar V, Sinha AK, Makkar HPS, et al. Dietary roles of phytate and[51]
phytase in human nutrition: A review. Food Chem 2010; 945-59.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.11.052]
Vijayalakshmi A, Kiran Kumar Y. Evaluation of goitrogenic and[52]
antithyroidal effect of the fern Adiantum capillus-veneris. Brazilian J
Pharmacogn 2013; 23: 802-0.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-695X2013000500013]
Latté KP, Appel KE, Lampen A. Health benefits and possible risks of[53]
broccoli - an overview. Food Chem Toxicol 2011; 49(12): 3287-309.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2011.08.019] [PMID: 21906651]
Abdul-Aziz A. efficacy of the cruciferous vegetable on the thyroid[54]
gland and the gonads in rabbits. Adv Anim Vet Sci 2015; 3(3): 183-.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.14737/journal.aavs/2015/3.3.183.191]
Gaitan E. Goitrogens in food and water. Annu Rev Nutr 1990; 10:[55]
21-39.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.nu.10.070190.000321] [PMID:
1696490]
Berrios JDJ, Morales P, Cámara M, et al. Carbohydrate composition of[56]
raw and extruded pulse flours. Food Res Int 2010; 43: 531-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2009.09.035]
Reddy NR, Pierson MD, Sathe SK, et al. Chemical, nutritional and[57]
physiological aspects of dry bean carbohydrates-A review. Food Chem
1984; 13: 25-68.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0308-8146(84)90026-8]
Martínez-Villaluenga C, Frias J, Vidal-Valverde C. Alpha-[58]
galactosides: Antinutritional factors or functional ingredients? Crit
Rev Food Sci Nutr 2008; 48(4): 301-16.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10408390701326243] [PMID: 18409113]
Leske KL, Zhang B, Coon CN. The use of low alpha-galactoside[59]
protein products as a protein source in chicken diets. Anim Feed Sci
Technol 1995; 54: 275-86.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(95)00773-G]
Glencross BD, Boujard T, Kaushik SJ. Influence of oligosaccharides[60]
on the digestibility of lupin meals when fed to rainbow trout,
Oncorhynchus mykiss. Aquaculture 2003; 219: 703-13.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(02)00664-6]
Ikewuchi CC. Hypocholesterolemic effect of an aqueous extract of the[61]
leaves of Sansevieria senegambica Baker on plasma lipid profile and
atherogenic indices of rats fed egg yolk supplemented diet. EXCLI J
2012; 11: 346-56.
[PMID: 27418909]
Barky A, Hussein S, Alm-Eldeen Y, et al. Saponins and their potential[62]
role in diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Manag (Lond) 2017; 7(1): 148-58.
Johnson IT, Gee JM, Price K, Curl C, Fenwick GR. Influence of[63]
saponins on gut permeability and active nutrient transport in vitro. J
Nutr 1986; 116(11): 2270-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jn/116.11.2270] [PMID: 3794833]
Akwaowo EU, Ndon BA, Etuk EU. Minerals and antinutrients in[64]
fluted pumpkin (Telfairia occidentalis Hook f.). Food Chem 2000;
70(2): 235-40.
Antinutrients in Plant-based Foods The Open Biotechnology Journal, 2019, Volume 13 75
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(99)00207-1]
Olawoye BT, Gbadamosi SO. Effect of different treatments on in vitro[65]
protein digestibility, antinutrients, antioxidant properties and mineral
composition of Amaranthus viridis seed. Cogent Food Agric 2017; 3:
1.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2017.1296402]
Mamboleo T. Nutrients and antinutritional factors at different maturity[66]
stages of selected indigenous African green leafy vegetables. 2015.
Natesh NH. SK A, L A. An overview of nutritional and anti nutritional[67]
factors in green leafy vegetables. Hortic Int Journal 2018; 1(2): 58-65.
Khokhar S, Chauhan BM. Anti-nutritional factors in moth beans[68]
(Vigna aconitifolia): Varietal difference and effects of methods of
domestic processing and cooking. J Food Sci 1986; 51(3): 591-4.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1986.tb13887.x]
Ndidi US, Ndidi CU, Olagunju A, Muhammad A, Billy FG, Okpe O.[69]
Proximate, antinutrients and mineral composition of raw and
processed (boiled and roasted) sphenostylis stenocarpa seeds from
Southern Kaduna, Northwest Nigeria. ISRN Nutr 2014; 2014280837
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/280837] [PMID: 24967265]
Margier M, Georgé S, Hafnaoui N, et al. Nutritional composition and[70]
bioactive content of legumes: Characterization of pulses frequently
consumed in France and effect of the cooking method. Nutrients 2018;
10(11)E1668
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu10111668] [PMID: 30400385]
Sinha K, Khare V. Review on: Antinutritional factors in vegetable[71]
crops. Pharma Innov J 2017; 12: 353-8.
Chai W, Liebman M. Oxalate content of legumes, nuts, and grain-[72]
based flours. J Food Compos Anal 2005; 18: 723-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2004.07.001]
Harland BF, Smikle-Williams S, Oberleas D. High performance liquid[73]
chromatography analysis of phytate (IP6) in selected foods. J Food
Compos Anal 2004; 17: 227-3.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2003.08.005]
Ahmed E. Peanut and soybean lectin determination. Peanut Sci 1986;[74]
13: 7-10.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3146/i0095-3679-13-1-2]
Kasim AB, Edwards HMJ. The analysis of inositolphosphate forms in[75]
feed ingredients. Sci Food Agric 1998; 76: 1-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(199801)76:1<1::AID-JSF
A922>3.0.CO;2-9]
Shah SB, Sartaj L, Ali F, et al. Plant extracts are the potential[76]
inhibitors of α-amylase: A review. MOJ Bioequiv Availab 2018; 5(5):
270-3.
Rezaul Haque M, Howard Bradbury J. Total cyanide determination of[77]
plants and foods using the picrate and acid hydrolysis methods. Food
Chem 2002; 77: 107-14.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(01)00313-2]
Popoola D, Adusami D. Oxalate content of some Nigerian tubers using[78]
titrimetric and UV- spectrophotometric methods. Acad J Agric Res
2014; 2(2): 54-7.
Akalu ZK, Geleta SH. Antinutritional levels of tubers of Colocasia[79]
esculenta, L. Schott (Taro) and Dioscorea alata (Yam) cultivated in
Ethiopia. J Nutr Food Sci 2017; 7: 585.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2155-9600.1000585]
Akubugwo IE, Obasi AN, Ginika SC. Nutritional potential of the[80]
leaves and seeds of black nightshade - Solanum nigrum L. Var
virginicum from Afikpo-Nigeria. Pak J Nutr 2007; 6(4): 323-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2007.323.326]
Tatham AS, Shewry PR. Allergens to wheat and related cereals. Clin[81]
Exp Allergy 2008; 38(11): 1712-26.
[PMID: 18823308]
Lister J, Fletcher PJ, Nobrega JN, Remington G. Behavioral effects of[82]
food-derived opioid-like peptides in rodents: Implications for
schizophrenia? Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2015; 134: 70-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2015.01.020] [PMID: 25661529]
Tovoli F, Masi C, Guidetti E, Negrini G, Paterini P, Bolondi L.[83]
Clinical and diagnostic aspects of gluten related disorders. World J
Clin Cases 2015; 3(3): 275-84.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v3.i3.275] [PMID: 25789300]
Loukas S, Varoucha D, Zioudrou C, Streaty RA, Klee WA. Opioid[84]
activities and structures of α-casein-derived exorphins. Biochemistry
1983; 22(19): 4567-73.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bi00288a034] [PMID: 6313043]
Trivedi MS, Hodgson NW, Walker SJ, Trooskens G, Nair V, Deth RC.[85]
Epigenetic effects of casein-derived opioid peptides in SH-SY5Y
human neuroblastoma cells. Nutr Metab (Lond) 2015; 12: 54.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12986-015-0050-1] [PMID: 26664459]
Van Campen DR. Copper interference with the intestinal absorption of[86]
zinc-65 by rats. J Nutr 1969; 97(1): 104-8.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jn/97.1.104] [PMID: 5763434]
Ostlund RE Jr. Phytosterols in human nutrition. Annu Rev Nutr 2002;[87]
22: 533-49.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.nutr.22.020702.075220] [PMID:
12055357]
Cohn JS, Kamili A, Wat E, Chung RW, Tandy S. Dietary[88]
phospholipids and intestinal cholesterol absorption. Nutrients 2010;
2(2): 116-27.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu2020116] [PMID: 22254012]
Genser D. Food and drug interaction: Consequences for the[89]
nutrition/health status. Ann Nutr Metab 2008; 52(Suppl. 1): 29-32.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000115345] [PMID: 18382075]
Jin MJ, Han HK. Effect of piperine, a major component of black[90]
pepper, on the intestinal absorption of fexofenadine and its implication
on food-drug interaction. J Food Sci 2010; 75(3): H93-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2010.01542.x] [PMID:
20492299]
Foster BC, Vandenhoek S, Hana J, et al. In vitro inhibition of human[91]
cytochrome P450-mediated metabolism of marker substrates by
natural products. Phytomedicine 2003; 10(4): 334-42.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1078/094471103322004839] [PMID: 12809364]
Vaquero MP, Sánchez Muniz FJ, Jiménez Redondo S, Prats Oliván P,[92]
Higueras FJ, Bastida S. Major diet-drug interactions affecting the
kinetic characteristics and hypolipidaemic properties of statins. Nutr
Hosp 2010; 25(2): 193-206.
[PMID: 20449528]
2017.https://patienteducation.osumc.edu/Documents/diet-ant.pdf[93]
Kao TH, Huang SC, Inbaraj BS, Chen BH. Determination of[94]
flavonoids and saponins in Gynostemma pentaphyllum (Thunb.)
Makino by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Anal Chim
Acta 2008; 626(2): 200-11.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2008.07.049] [PMID: 18790122]
L, Liu SW, Jiang SB, Wu SG. Tannin inhibits HIV-1 entry by[95]
targeting gp41. Acta Pharmacol Sin 2004; 25(2): 213-8.
[PMID: 14769212]
Akiyama H, Fujii K, Yamasaki O, Oono T, Iwatsuki K. Antibacterial[96]
action of several tannins against Staphylococcus aureus. J Antimicrob
Chemother 2001; 48(4): 487-91.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/48.4.487] [PMID: 11581226]
Kolodziej H, Kiderlen AF. Antileishmanial activity and immune[97]
modulatory effects of tannins and related compounds on Leishmania
parasitised RAW 264.7 cells. Phytochemistry 2005; 66(17): 2056-71.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2005.01.011] [PMID:
16153409]
Bains K, Uppal V, Kaur H. Optimization of germination time and heat[98]
treatments for enhanced availability of minerals from leguminous
sprouts. J Food Sci Technol 2014; 51(5): 1016-20.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13197-011-0582-y] [PMID: 24803714]
Gupta V, Nagar R. Minerals and antinutrients profile of rabadi after[99]
different traditional preparation methods. J Food Sci Technol 2014;
51(8): 1617-21.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13197-012-0667-2] [PMID: 25114357]
Devi R, Chaudhary C, Jain V, et al. Effect of soaking on anti-[100]
nutritional factors in the sun-dried seeds of hybrid pigeon pea to
enhance their nutrients bioavailability. JPP 2018; 7(2): 675-80.
Agume AS, Njintang NY, Mbofung CM. Effect of soaking and[101]
roasting on the physicochemical and pasting properties of soybean
flour. Foods 2017; 6(2): 12.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods6020012] [PMID: 28231091]
Shi L, Mu K, Arntfield SD, Nickerson MT. Changes in levels of[102]
enzyme inhibitors during soaking and cooking for pulses available in
Canada. J Food Sci Technol 2017; 54(4): 1014-22.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13197-017-2519-6] [PMID: 28303052]
Binita R, Khetarpaul N. Probiotic fermentation: Effect on antinutrients[103]
and digestibility of starch and protein of indigenously developed food
mixture. Nutr Health 1997; 11(3): 139-47.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/026010609701100301] [PMID: 9131698]
Babalola RO, Giwa OE. Effect of fermentation on nutritional and anti-[104]
nutritional properties of fermenting Soybeans and the antagonistic
effect of the fermenting organism on selected pathogens. Int Res J
Microbiol 2012; 3(10): 333-8.
Ojokoh AO, Daramola MK, Oluoti OJ. Effect of fermentation on[105]
nutrient and anti-nutrient composition of breadfruit (Treculia africana)
and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) blend flours. Afr J Agric Res 2013;
8(27): 3566-70.
76 The Open Biotechnology Journal, 2019, Volume 13 Popova and Mihaylova
[http://dx.doi.org/10.5897/AJAR12.1944]
Valdez-González FJ, Gutiérrez-Dorado R, García-Ulloa M, Cuevas-[106]
Rodríguez BL, Rodríguez-González H. Effect of fermented, hardened,
and dehulled of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) meals in digestibility and
antinutrients in diets for tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Span J Agric
Res 2018; 16(1)
[http://dx.doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2018161-11830]
Adeyemo SM, Onilude AA, Olugbogi DO. Reduction of Anti-[107]
nutritional factors of sorghum by lactic acid bacteria isolated from
Abacha - an African fermented staple. Front Sci 2016; 6(1): 25-30.
Vidal-Valverde C, Frias J, Sierra I, et al. New functional legume food[108]
by germination: Effect on the nutritive value of beans, lentils and peas.
Eur Food Res Technol 2002; 215: 472-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00217-002-0602-2]
Dikshit M, Ghadle M. Effect of sprouting on nutrients, antinutrients[109]
and in vitro digestibility of the MACS-13 soybean variety. Plant Foods
Hum Nutr 2003; 58(3): 1-11.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:QUAL.0000040357.70606.4c]
Kanensi OJ, Ochola S, Gikonyo NK, Makokha A. Optimization of the[110]
period of steeping and germination for amaranth grain. J Agric Food
Tech 2011; 1(6): 101-5.
Kajla PS, Sharma A, Sood DR. Effect of germination on proximate[111]
principles, minerals and antinutrients of flaxseeds. Asian J Dairy Food
Res 2017; 36(1): 52-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.18805/ajdfr.v36i01.7459]
Chauhan ES. Effects of processing (germination and popping) on the[112]
nutritional and anti-nutritional properties of finger millet (Eleusine
Coracana). Curr Res Nutr Food Sci 2018; 6(2)
Fernando R, Pinto P, Pathmeswaran A. Goitrogenic food and[113]
prevalence of goitre in Sri Lanka. J Food Sci 2012; 41: 1076-81.
Udousoro II, Akpan EB. Anthropometric measurements, changes in[114]
anti-nutrients contents of edible vegetables under varied temperature
and heating time. Curr Res Nutr Food Sci 2014; 2(3)
[http://dx.doi.org/10.12944/CRNFSJ.2.3.06]
Mwanri A, Kogi-Makau W, Laswai H. Nutrients and antinutrients[115]
composition of raw, cooked and sun-dried sweet potato leaves. Afr J
Food Agric Nutr Dev 2011; 11(5): 5142-56.
Adeleke OR, Adiamo OQ, Fawale OS, et al. Effect of processing[116]
methods on antinutrients and oligosaccharides contents and protein
digestibility of the flours of two newly developed bambara groundnut
cultivars. Int Food Res J 2017; 5(9): 1006-14.
Al-Kaisey MT, Alwan AKH, Mohammad MH, Saeed AH. Effect of[117]
gamma irradiation on antinutritional factors in broad bean. Radiat Phys
Chem 2003; 67(3): 493-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0969-806X(03)00091-4]
Hassan AB, Osman GM, Rushdi MA, et al. Effect of gamma[118]
irradiation on the nutritional quality of maize cultivars (Zea mays) and
sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) grains. Pak J Nutr 2009; 8: 167-.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2009.167.171]
El Niely HFG. Effect of radiation processing on antinutrients, in vitro[119]
protein digestibility and protein efficiency ratio bioassay of legume
seeds. Radiat Phys Chem 2007; 76: 1050-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2006.10.006]
Fombang EN, Taylor JRN, Mbofung CMF, et al. Use of γ-irradiation[120]
to alleviate the poor protein digestibility of sorghum porridge. Food
Chem 2005; 91: 695-03.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.06.042]
Osman AM, Hassan AB, Osman GA, et al. Effects of gamma[121]
irradiation and/or cooking on nutritional quality of faba bean (Vicia
faba L.) cultivars seeds. J Food Sci Technol 2014; 51(8): 1554-60.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13197-012-0662-7] [PMID: 25114347]
Mahmoud NS, Awad SH, Madani RM, Osman FA, Elmamoun K,[122]
Hassan AB. Effect of γ radiation processing on fungal growth and
quality characteristcs of millet grains. Food Sci Nutr 2015; 4(3):
342-7.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.295] [PMID: 27247763]
Pedrosa M. Recent advances of research in antinutritional factors in[123]
legume seeds and oilseeds. Wageningen Academic Pub. In: 2004; p.
263.
Shukla VK, Doyon Y, Miller JC, et al. Precise genome modification in[124]
the crop species Zea mays using zinc-finger nucleases. Nature 2009;
459(7245): 437-41.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature07992] [PMID: 19404259]
Kim H, Kim S-T, Kim S-G, et al. Targeted genome editing for crop[125]
improvement. Plant Breed Biotechnol 2015; 3(4): 283-90.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.9787/PBB.2015.3.4.283]
© 2019 Popova and Mihaylova.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is
available at: (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode). This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided
the original author and source are credited.
... Although there was no significant difference (P >0.05) in the phytate content of the samples, the values increased as the amount of red kidney bean was increased. The major antinutritional role of phytate in diets is that they influence bioavailability of minerals, digestibility, functionality and solubility of carbohydrates and proteins (Popova and Mihaylova, 2019). The result revealed that pap saponin content was low. ...
... The result revealed that pap saponin content was low. The high value observed in this study may be due to insufficient heat treatment since heat treatment has been recommended as the easiest method of reducing trypsin inhibitor (Popova and Mihaylova, 2019). The result revealed that inclusion of red kidney bean increased haemagglutinins values significantly (P < 0.05) in the samples. ...
... Leaf meal emerges as a promising candidate owing to the ubiquity of plant species on Earth, which encompass around 374,000 varieties (Christenhusz & Byng, 2016), and the consistent availability of leaves throughout the year.Numerous leaf types contain a substantial protein content (Telek & Martin, 1983). Nevertheless, the bioavailability of minerals and proteins in plants is hindered by anti-nutritional factors inherent in plant defense mechanisms (Popova & Mihaylova, 2019). ...
Article
Full-text available
Black Gram leaf meal (BGLM) underwent assessment through a 60-day feeding experiment within the diet of Labeo rohita fingerlings. Six iso-nitrogenous (30% CP) and isocaloric (360 Kcal/100 g) diets, namely Control i.e., T1 (0% BGLM, 30% DORB); T2 (3% BGLM, 27% DORB); T3 (6% BGLM, 24% DORB); T4 (9% BGLM, 21% DORB); T5 (12% BGLM, 18% DORB); T6 (15% BGLM, 15% DORB) were formulated. A total of one hundred and eighty acclimated fish (14.16 ± 0.16 g) were randomly assigned into six treatment groups in triplicate, with a stocking density of 10 fish per tank, and were fed the respective diets at satiation levels. The incorporation of black gram leaf meal (BGLM) at levels up to 9% exhibited no impact on the growth rate of Labeo rohita fingerlings in comparison to the control (0%), however, the inclusion of BGLM at either 12% or 15% notably reduced the growth rate. Among the different groups, T6 displayed a noteworthy decrease (P<0.05) in nutrient utilization compared to the other experimental groups. Additionally, significantly higher (P<0.05) HSI and GSI values were observed in the T6 group when compared with the control and other treatment groups. The comprehensive findings indicated that BGLM can be effectively integrated up to 9% by substituting DORB without compromising growth, thus suggesting its potential as an alternative component in the diet of Labeo rohita fingerlings.
... However, application of a single method has not been effective in reducing the antinutritive and toxic factors. Thus, a combination of several methods has been considered as the best strategy (Popova & Mihaylova 2019). However, because of lengthy multistep processes and high costs associated with application of several methods that often result in the quality of feed being compromised, many farmers in the sub-Saharan African countries are unable to keep apace as a result of poor infrastructures and limited resources. ...
Article
Full-text available
Anti-nutritive and toxic factors in plants adversely affect animal health and production. Hence, the aims of the study were to (1) carry out qualitative and quantitative analysis of these factors in Terminalia sericea that grows abundantly in Onderstepoort; (2) evaluate an affordable, efficient and reliable method that reduces these factors and (3) evaluate antioxidant properties of the phenolic compounds. Thus, sequential organic and aqueous extractions were carried out on T. sericea leaves and feed pellets. Extracts were subjected to qualitative analysis to confirm the presence of 11 phytochemicals. While quantitative analysis of nine phytochemicals was carried out on spectrophotometry, the phenolic extracts were further tested for antioxidant activity on 2,2-diphenyl-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) assay where gallic acid (GA), quercetin (Q) and ascorbic acid (AA) were used as standards. The contents of GA, Q and AA in the phenolic extracts were determined on high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Aqueous extraction was an effective method as most phytochemicals were extracted. Nine phytochemicals were qualitatively analysed in T. sericea. The highest contents of 1.97% and 2.37 ± 0.077 mg/g gallic acid equivalent with a significant difference (p 0.05) were determined in oxalates and phenolics, respectively. Furthermore, 83.1% DPPH inhibition (IC50 = 0.0432 µg/mL) was determined relative to the standards (85.27% – 85.96%; IC50 = 0.000009 µg/mL – 0.00042 µg/mL). Subsequently, HPLC results showed that T. sericea contained high concentration of AA (62.5 ± 2.13 µg/mL) to confirm antioxidant properties of the leaves.Contribution: Though T. sericea leaves have antioxidant activities, the alkaloid contents may pose a threat to the livestock. Therefore, farmers around Onderstepoort should protect their livestock from feeding on these leaves.
... Phytic acid, which is widely distributed in the outer shell of grains and beans, chelates with divalent ions such as Fe2+, Zn2+, Mg2+, and Ca2+ to prevent absorption in the small intestine (Gupta et al., 2015). Phytic acid also functions as a nonnutritional ingredient, preventing the body from using minerals and blocking vital digestion enzymes like α-amylase, trypsin, and pepsin by adhering firmly to the protein base (Popova and Mihaylova, 2019). Phytic acid was once thought to be non-nutritional because of its influence on mineral absorption, but more recently, its antioxidant, anticancer, and lipid-lowering properties have made it popular (Abdulwaliyu et al., 2019) Figure 3. ...
Article
Full-text available
An extensive examination of the medical uses of soybean bioactive components is provided by this thorough review. It explores the possible health advantages of isoflavones with phytoestrogenic qualities, like genistein, which may lower the risk of cancer. The review highlights the different roles and possible anticancer activities of phenolic compounds, phytic acid, protease inhibitors, lignans, and saponins, among other bioactive components. It also addresses the benefits of dietary fiber and oligosaccharides derived from soybeans for intestinal health, as well as the impact of soy protein on diabetes, obesity, cancer, and cardiovascular health. Conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) has anticancer and cholesterol-lowering properties; its involvement in promoting metabolic processes is also examined. Pinitol is highlighted in the study as a blood sugar regulator with promise for controlling insulin signaling. In this review, we aim to affirm soybeans’ potential as a high-functional, well-being food by examining their recently discovered therapeutic and pharmacological capabilities, rather than to improve upon the previous studies on the reported nutritional advantages of soybeans.
Article
Full-text available
This study aims to determine the effect of giving Gamal leaf flour and the best dose of giving Gamal leaf flour in the ration on broiler carcasses. The research was carried out experimentally with a Completely Randomized Design consisting of 4 treatments and 5 replications, each treatment consisting of 5 broilers. The treatments given consisted of control without giving Gamal leaf flour (A), giving 2% Gamal leaf flour (B), giving 4% Gamal leaf flour (C), and giving 6% Gamal leaf flour (D). Research parameters include carcass percentage, upper carcass percentage, and lower carcass percentage for broilers. The results of the research showed that the provision of Gamal leaf flour (Gliricidia sepium) was found to have a significant positive effect (p<0.05) on the percentage of the carcass, the percentage of the upper carcass, and the percentage of the lower carcass of broilers. The provision of gamal leaf flour (Gliricidia sepium) at a concentration of 2% gave the best results on broiler carcasses where the percentage of carcass was 69.978%, the percentage of upper carcass 44.41%, and the percentage of lower carcass 34.966%.
Article
Full-text available
Millets are recognized as future foods due to their abundant nutrition and resilience, increasing their value on the global stage. Millets possess a broad spectrum of nutrients, antinutrients, and antioxidants, making it imperative to understand the effects of various processing methods on these components. Antinutritional factors interfere with the digestibility of macro-nutrients and the bioavailability and bio accessibility of minerals. This necessitates methods to reduce or eliminate antinutrients while improving nutritive and antioxidant value in food. This review aims to elucidate the rationale behind processing choices by evaluating the scientific literature and examining the mechanisms of processing methods, categorized as physiochemical, bio, thermal, novel non-thermal, and their combination techniques. Physiochemical and bioprocessing methods alter antinutrients and antioxidant profiles through mass transfer, enzyme activation, product synthesis, microbial activity, and selective removal of grain layers. Thermal methods break functional bonds, modify the chemical or physical structures, enhance kinetics, or degrade heat-labile components. Non-thermal techniques preserve heat-sensitive antioxidants while reducing antinutrients through structural modifications, oxidation by ROS, and break down the covalent and non-covalent bonds, resulting in degradation of compounds. To maximize the trade-off between retention of beneficial components and reducing detrimental ones, exploring the synergy of combination techniques is crucial. Beyond mitigating antinutrients, these processing methods also stimulate the release of bioactive compounds, including phenolics, flavonoids, and peptides, which exhibit potent health-promoting properties. This review underscores the transformative potential of processing technologies in enhancing millets as functional ingredients in modern diets, promoting health and advancing sustainable food practices.
Article
Full-text available
Vegetables are an important source of protective food and a part of healthy diet. They contain chemical compounds, such as carbohydrates, sugars, proteins and vitamins, which are essential to human growth and health. In fact they make up for about 20% of an average Indian meal. However, plants generally contain toxic and anti-nutrients acquired from fertilizer and pesticides and several naturally occurring chemicals. Some of these chemicals are known as secondary metabolites or anti-nutritional factors and they have been shown to be highly biologically active. Anti-nutritional factor is known to interfere with metabolic processes such that growth and bioavailability of nutrients are negatively influenced. They include saponins, alkaloids, protease inhibitors, oxalates, haemaggluttinins (lectin), cyanogens, lethogens, and goitrogen. The list is inexhaustible, some of these plant chemicals have been shown to be deleterious to health or evidently advantageous to human health, if consumed in appropriate amounts.
Article
Full-text available
Rabadi is a cereal and buttermilk based traditional fermented recipe of western region of India. There are many traditional preparation methods, which may alter biochemical composition of rabadi, therefore, in the present study, role of traditional processings (cooking, fermentation, dehulling, utensil, preparation methods and cereals) on minerals and antinutrients of pearl millet, wheat flour and refined wheat flour rabadi was investigated on fresh weight basis. Results showed that the process of cooking and fermentation enhanced minerals (Ca, Fe and P) in all types of rabadi samples at different levels of significance, while antinutrients (phytic acid, total phenols and oxalates) reflected a declining trend. Intercomparison of different types of rabadies exhibited that fermented-cooked-fermented samples were better than cooked-fermented rabadies. Dehulling caused a loss of minerals, but antinutrients were also degraded after dehulling; therefore dehulled sample showed very good nutritional profile after fermentation. Earthen pot rabadi samples presented better biochemical composition than rabadies prepared in steel pot. Intercomparison of different cereals based rabadies reflected superior position of fermented-cooked-fermented pearl millet flour rabadi than cooked-fermented pearl millet flour rabadi, wheat and refined wheat flour rabadi samples.
Article
Full-text available
Diabetes mellitus is a serious disease with a high incidence of occurrence all over the world. The number of diabetic patient will jump to 439 million by 2030. Diabetes cause a lot of complication as it can affect the entire organ in the body as liver, kidney, retina and heart. Apigenin is a potent antioxidant, it can stimulate the metabolism of glucose and transportation of it in the peripheral tissues; also enhance secretion of insulin from pancreas. It has the ability to overcome dyslipidemia which result as a non-control of diabetes. Apigenin can enhance the metabolism of glucose via suppression the activities of gluconeogenic enzymes and aldose reductase enzyme and so prevent diabetic complication as cataracts, retinopathy, and neuropathy that may result if sorbitol diffuses out cell membrane.
Article
Full-text available
The potential uses of the starchy roots as a food and as an income-generating product in the rural areas could not be satisfactorily done in the developing countries especially in Ethiopia. Therefore Promoting and supporting the use of taro and yam can make a major contribution to the food security of Ethiopia and of the world as well. The present study focused on, the quantitative determination of antinutrient contents of the taro and yam samples cultivated in southwestern Ethiopia (Keffa zone, Benchmaji zone and Sheka zone). The parameters investigated were antinutrient factors such as: oxalate, Phytate and tannin. Antinutrient factors were determined by different standardized analytical methods and the results of both taro and yam samples were compared and analyzed accordingly. The result indicated that, the antinutrient levels of both raw taro and yam samples in this study were: Oxalate (0.062-0.085, 0.054-0.063 mg/100 g), Phytate (31.17-161.13, 55.72-179.74 mg/100 g) and tannin (4.18-6.72, 3.06-4.54 mg/100 g), respectively. The raw taro and yam tubers analyzed in this study were very low compared to the recommendations for patients with calcium oxalate kidney stones. In this study, in general, antinutritional contents of the current study had no significant health hazard even at raw level in comparison to their critical toxicity effect.
Article
Full-text available
Phytic acid is a substance found in many types of plant foods, such as grains, legumes (including peanuts and soybeans), nuts, and seeds. It is the storage form of phosphorus, an important mineral used in the production of energy as well as the formation of structural elements like cell membranes (Jacela et al., 2010). These foods, are getting a bad reputation due to phytic acid content (Navert, et al,,1985) and its ability to bind to essential minerals such as iron, zinc, calcium, and magnesium in the digestive tract and inhibit their absorption by the body (Weaver &Kannan, 2002). Recent studies indicate despite being somewhat demonized for its ability to reduce mineral absorption, phytic acid actually has some potentially beneficial properties. On the plus side, phytic acid can act as antioxidant, exhibits anti-cancer properties, and may have a positive impact on cholesterol and blood sugar (Omni et al., 2004). Preparation methods can reduce the phytic acid content in food, as well as adjusting meal times and food choices (Sade., 2009), can help to have better mineral absorption.
Article
Full-text available
Pulses display nutritional benefits and are recommended in sustainable diets. Indeed, they are rich in proteins and fibers, and can contain variable amounts of micronutrients. However, pulses also contain bioactive compounds such as phytates, saponins, or polyphenols/tannins that can exhibit ambivalent nutritional properties depending on their amount in the diet. We characterized the nutritional composition and bioactive compound content of five types of prepared pulses frequently consumed in France (kidney beans, white beans, chickpeas, brown and green lentils, flageolets), and specifically compared the effects of household cooking vs. canning on the composition of pulses that can be consumed one way or the other. The contents in macro-, micronutrients, and bioactive compounds highly varied from one pulse to another (i.e., 6.9 to 9.7 g/100 g of cooked product for proteins, 4.6 to 818.9 µg/100 g for lutein or 15.0 to 284.3 mg/100 g for polyphenols). The preparation method was a key factor governing pulse final nutritional composition in hydrophilic compounds, depending on pulse species. Canning led to a greater decrease in proteins, total dietary fibers, magnesium or phytate contents compared to household cooking (i.e., −30%, −44%, −33% and −38%, p < 0.05, respectively, in kidney beans). As canned pulses are easy to use for consumers, additional research is needed to improve their transformation process to further optimize their nutritional quality.
Article
Full-text available
Diabetes mellitus is a metabolic disorder characterized by chronic hyperglycemia with disturbances of carbohydrate, lipid and protein metabolism resulting from defects in insulin secretion, insulin action or both. Among the various therapeutic approaches to treat diabetes, postprandial hyperglycemia reduction is at most importance. This approach is used to prevent absorption of glucose by the inhibition of enzymes which hydrolyze carbohydrates, such as alpha-amylase. The α-amylase is one of the main products of secretion of the salivary glands and pancreas, which plays a role in the digestion of starch and glycogen and can be found in microorganisms, plants and higher organisms. α-amylase enzyme catalyzing the initial step in the hydrolysis of starch to the oligosaccharide mixture consisting of maltose, malt triose 6-8 and oligosaccharides containing glucose units both α-1,4 and α-1,6 linkages branched. Here in the present work a review was carried to collectively highlight all those potent alpha-amylase inhibitors whose sources are plants. These inhibitors possess antioxidant and are the considered strong tools in future treatments of diabetes mellitus as well free from side effects.
Article
Full-text available
This study is aimed to analyze nutrient and anti-nutrient content of finger millet and add value to it through household processing techniques such as germination and popping. Total ash content for WRFMF (Whole Raw Finger Millet Flour), GFMF (Germinated Finger Millet Flour) and PFMF (Popped Finger Millet Flour) were 2.8±0.17, 2.7±0.10 and 2.88±0.08 (g/100g). Finger millets are good source of protein and in the same line protein content was 6.3±0.20 in WRFMF, 8.8±0.30 in GFMF, 7.1±0.3 g/100g in PFMF. Mineral analysis of processed forms of finger millet revealed that calcium and iron content increased significantly during germination. While during popping of finger millet, calcium content decreased and iron content increased significantly. Phosphorus content decreased in GFMF and increased in PFMF significantly. Statistical analysis for significance was observed at P < 0.05. Tannin contents of WRFMF, GFMF and PFMF were found as 870.8±1.05, 360.5±0.10, 610.2±2.1 mg/100g respectively. Phytic acid content for WRFMF was 851.4±1.6 mg/100g, in germination it was 238.5±1.3 mg/100g (GFMF) and while in popping it was 333.1± 1.07 mg/100g (PFMF). Oxalic acid content and trypsin inhibitor activity decreased after germination and popping process significantly. Results showed that germination and popping increased the nutritional profile and decreased anti-nutrients content in finger millet. The current findings are helpful for nourishing and maximize the human health. Reduction of anti-nutrients enhanced the acceptability, digestibility and bioavailability of nutrient. Household food processing strategies like germination and popping can be used for improving the nutritional quality to promote finger millet utilization.
Article
Full-text available
Plant foods contain a surprising number of different toxins. A few well-known plants, including some grown in Thailand are known to contain high levels of oxalates however, some plants have not yet been fully investigated. A few plants have become fashionable to promote health because they contain antioxidants but some of these plants will contain oxalates as well. In many cases there is little published data to confirm the oxalates levels of these plants. If plant leaves are boiled before they are consumed this allows soluble oxalate to be leached out and discarded in the cooking water. This means that the cooked food contains considerably lower levels of soluble oxalates than the original raw plants. Cooking in a wok generally concentrates the oxalate contents as much of the cooking water is removed as steam. However, during cooking some of the soluble oxalates can combine with free calcium in the food and be converted to insoluble oxalates; these are not absorbed in the digestive tract. The preparation of juices using fruit or vegetables are being promoted as healthy alternatives, this poses further problems, as they may be prepared from raw vegetable leaves, such as spinach, which contain high levels of oxalates. These juices are not cooked so the oxalate concentration is not reduced during their preparation. Recent research has shown that the addition of calcium salts to these juices can considerably reduce the soluble oxalate content of the drink prepared without changing the taste.
Article
Full-text available
Among the most typical feed sources for tilapia, plants represent a low-cost source in substituting for traditional high-cost feed ingredients. Fermentation, hardening and dehulling are common grains processing techniques to make plant nutrients available and more digestible to fish. Apparent digestibility coefficients (ADC) of dry matter and protein, and antinutrients (phytic acid and tannins) in fermented, hardened and dehulled chickpea (Cicer arietinum) meals were determined for juvenile Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). The highest ADC was obtained with processed (fermented, hardened and dehulled) chickpea meals compared with non-processed. Results indicated that fermentation increased the protein content by 13.1%, decreased the content of ash and phytic acid (47.5 and 45%, respectively), and increased the ingredient apparent digestibility of dry matter (ADM) by 23.2%, and the ingredient apparent digestibility of protein (ADP) by 41.9%. Dehulling meal increased the protein (5.7%) and lipid (6.4%) content of chickpea grains; decreased fiber, ash and tannin content (75.3%, 19.1%, and 84.5%, respectively); and increased ADM by 12.8%, and ADP by 10.4%. We conclude that fermented, hardened and dehulled chickpea meals represent a potential alternative in diets for juvenile O. niloticus.