Content uploaded by Aysun Dogutas
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Aysun Dogutas on Jul 17, 2019
Content may be subject to copyright.
U
n
H
Receiv
e
doi: 10
.
Abstra
Since
w
knowle
acade
m
for peo
p
the rea
d
Descri
p
study i
s
results
o
self an
d
and m
a
readin
g
Ke
y
wo
1. Intr
o
Since
w
it can
b
and kn
o
ability
person
a
transfe
r
strategi
stages
o
n
iversi
t
H
abit o
n
e
d: June 14
,
.
5296/ire.v
7
ct
w
e are liv
i
dge, readi
n
m
ic activity
p
le especia
l
d
ing habit
a
p
tive model
s
248 univ
e
of the stud
y
d
academic
a
le student
s
g
habit.
rds: Self-i
m
o
duction
w
e are livin
g
b
e said that
o
wledge-so
c
to underst
a
a
l growth a
n
r
and the
h
es. Childre
n
o
f life, find
t
y Stud
e
n
Acad
e
Dept. of
E
Tel: 90-50
,
2019
A
7
i2.15106
i
ng at kno
w
n
g is an ess
e
that increa
s
l
ly for univ
e
a
nd its’ effe
c
of quantit
a
e
rsity stude
n
y
showed t
h
success. T
h
s
’ opinions
m
provemen
t
g
at knowle
reading h
a
c
iety relati
o
a
nd wo
r
ds
c
n
d develop
m
h
abit of re
a
n
, who mi
s
it hard to a
c
e
nts’
O
e
mic S
u
Ay
E
ducational
Kınıklı Ka
m
6-600-311
4
A
ccepted: J
u
URL:
h
w
ledge ag
e
e
ntial tool
f
s
es skills i
n
e
rsity stud
e
c
ts on self-i
m
a
tive resear
c
n
ts at Educ
h
at univers
i
h
e results a
l
about self
-
t
, Academi
c
dge age an
d
a
bit is a so
c
o
n. Readin
g
c
ontained i
m
ent (Dadz
i
a
ding is a
n
s
s the oppo
r
c
quire goo
d
44
O
pinion
s
u
ccess
a
A
ysun Dogu
t
Sciences,
P
m
püsü, De
n
4
E-mail
u
ly 14, 201
9
h
ttps://doi.
o
e
and hav
e
f
or knowle
d
n
reading s
t
e
nts. In this
mproveme
n
c
h was use
d
ation Facu
l
i
ty students
l
so showed
f
-
improvem
e
c
success,
R
d
have a so
c
c
ial elemen
t
g
is a basis
i
n a docu
m
ie, 2008).
R
n
academic
r
tunity of
g
d
reading h
a
I
n
s
on E
f
a
nd Se
l
t
as
P
amukkale
U
n
izli, Turke
y
: adogutas
@
9
Publis
h
o
rg
/
10.5296
/
e
a societ
y
d
ge transfer
t
rategies. R
e
study, uni
v
n
t and aca
d
e
d
as a rese
a
l
ty, Pamuk
k
believe th
a
that there
i
e
nt and ac
a
R
eading ha
b
c
iety which
t
that will
p
of knowle
d
m
ent and m
a
R
eading is
a
activity t
h
g
etting in t
o
a
bits in thei
r
n
ternational
R
f
fects o
l
f-Imp
r
U
niversity
y
@
pau.edu.t
r
h
ed: July 1
6
/
ire.v7i2.1
5
y
which h
a
and the ha
b
e
ading hab
i
ersity stud
e
e
mic succe
s
a
rch model.
k
ale Univer
s
a
t reading
h
i
s a differe
n
a
demic suc
b
it
is been sh
a
p
rovide kn
o
d
ge acquisi
t
a
ke use of
a
n essential
h
at increas
e
o
uch with
b
r
later year
s
R
esearch in
E
ISSN
2
2019, Vol.
http://ire.mac
r
f Read
i
r
ovem
e
6
, 2019
5
106
a
s been sh
a
a
bit of read
i
i
t is very i
m
e
nts’ opinio
n
s
s will be e
x
.
The samp
l
sity in Tur
k
h
abit increa
n
ce betwee
n
c
cess depe
n
a
ped by kn
o
o
wledge- i
n
t
ion. Readi
n
the knowl
e
tool for kn
o
e
s skills in
b
ooks in th
e
s
(Deavers,
E
ducation
2
327-5499
7, No. 2
r
othin
k
.org
i
ng
e
nt
a
ped by
i
ng is an
m
portant
n
s about
x
amined.
l
e of the
k
ey. The
s
es their
n
female
n
ding on
o
wledge,
n
dividual
n
g is the
e
dge for
o
wledge
reading
e
ir early
2
000).
Readin
g
regular
l
(Yılma
z
contin
u
people.
second
a
elemen
t
Good r
e
2012).
R
readin
g
have d
i
enviro
n
an exci
t
experie
n
formed
family,
Accord
readin
g
require
s
import
a
that co
n
ha
b
its.
excelle
n
readin
g
lifelon
g
acade
m
As we
l
trainin
g
such as
and m
o
thinkin
g
student
student
s
Univer
s
student
s
learnin
g
import
a
Becaus
e
1999, s
.
1.1 Pre
v
Since r
e
g
habit is
d
l
y and crit
i
z
, 1993). A
n
u
ously is h
a
This habi
a
ry school
y
t
s can be di
v
e
ading ha
bi
R
eading ha
b
g
and acade
i
fferent le
v
n
ments and
t
ing voyag
e
n
ces. “Rea
d
it can last
school and
ing to Pal
a
g
is interre
l
s
successfu
l
a
nce as bot
h
n
tributes to
There is t
h
n
t perform
a
g
and readi
n
g
learning
p
m
ic success
(
l
l as classi
c
g
and traini
n
s
doing res
e
o
lding publ
g
individu
a
should be
s
’, who wi
s
ity studen
t
s
should b
e
g
individu
a
a
nt for eve
e
universit
y
.184).
v
ious Studi
e
e
ading is v
e
d
efined as
“
i
cally; as
a
n
act’s bei
n
a
rd. Readin
g
t can be
g
y
ears. Ther
e
v
ided into
t
i
ts act as a
s
b
it determi
n
mic achie
v
v
els of ac
a
localities.
T
e
to self-di
s
d
ing habit i
s
one’s life t
i
close envi
r
a
ni (2012),
e
l
ated with
l
reading h
a
h
the youn
g
their poor
p
h
e need f
o
a
nce. Resea
n
g activiti
e
p
rocess fo
r
(
Korkmaz,
A
c
aim and
n
g qualifie
d
e
arch; prod
u
ic opinion.
a
ls, they sh
o
profession
a
ll shape o
u
t
isn’t a li
v
e
an indivi
a
l. To be a
b
ry individ
u
y
youth fo
r
e
s
e
ry import
a
“
individual’
a
result of
n
g a habit is
g
’s being
a
g
ained duri
n
e
are many
t
wo as indi
v
s
trong wea
p
n
es the aca
d
ements are
demic ach
i
T
herefore, t
h
s
covery an
d
s
best form
e
i
me (Green
r
onment of
c
e
ffective r
e
the total e
d
a
bit. Palan
i
g
and the ol
d
p
erformanc
o
r the stud
e
r
chers and
e
s as the
m
there is
a
A
ras, Çele
b
scope of
h
d
manpowe
r
u
ce, spread
Since uni
v
o
uld be rai
s
a
l. There is
n
u
r future, h
v
ing just s
t
dual, who
b
le to cre
a
u
al of the
s
r
m intellig
e
a
nt there ar
e
45
s carrying
perceiving
s
n’t easy. T
o
a
habit is a
l
n
g school
elements
a
v
idual and
s
p
on for the
s
d
emic achie
v
dependent
i
evement
b
h
ey differ i
n
d
makes wa
y
e
d at a you
n
e, 2001).
B
children w
h
e
ading is i
m
ducational
i
(2012) fu
r
d
are glued
c
e in tests a
n
e
nt to for
m
academici
a
m
ost invalu
a
a
n essential
b
i, & Gürka
n
h
igher edu
c
r
, universiti
and protec
v
ersity yo
u
s
ed conscio
u
n
’t any oth
h
aving read
i
t
udying les
s
researches,
a
te a healt
h
society, is
e
ntsia of th
a
e
many stu
d
I
n
o
ut readin
g
reading a
s
o
be able to
l
so hard fo
years espe
a
ffecting in
d
s
ocial elem
e
s
tudents to
e
v
ement of
s
on each o
t
b
ecause th
e
n
the patter
n
y
for a bett
e
n
g impress
i
B
ut we sho
u
h
ile formin
g
m
portant av
e
process a
n
r
ther added
to the tele
v
n
d examin
a
m
good rea
d
a
ns, conduc
t
a
ble and i
n
correlatio
n
n
, 2015).
ation insti
t
es should
u
t knowled
g
u
th will be
u
s and qua
l
er natural
t
i
ng habit (
Ç
s
ons and
m
argues, p
r
h
y society,
more imp
o
a
t country
d
ies done
o
n
ternational
R
g
act as life
a need a
n
practice th
a
r
people e
s
cially duri
n
d
ividual’s r
e
e
nts.
e
xcel in lif
e
s
tudents to
a
t
her and in
t
y often c
o
n
of readin
g
e
r unde
r
sta
n
onable age
ldn’t ignor
e
g
reading h
a
e
nue of ef
fe
n
d hence,
e
that readi
n
v
ision. Mos
a
tions is lac
k
d
ing and s
t
ing studies
n
dispeansa
b
n
between
r
u
tions suc
h
u
ndertake s
o
g
e; being le
a
society’s
e
l
ified in th
i
h
ing than t
o
Ç
oban, İle
r
m
emorizing
r
oducing i
d
reading h
a
o
rtant for
u
(Turcan,
Y
o
n reading
h
R
esearch in
E
ISSN
2
2019, Vol.
http://ire.mac
r
e
long, conti
n
n
d source
o
h
at act regu
l
s
pecially f
o
n
g elemen
t
e
ading hab
i
e
(Bashir &
a
great ext
e
t
errelated.
S
o
me from
d
g
habits. R
e
n
ding of o
n
in school,
b
e
the impo
r
a
bit (Solm
a
f
ective lear
n
e
ducational
n
g habit ha
s
s
t students’
p
k
of prope
r
s
tudy habit
s
s
on readin
g
b
le elemen
t
reading ha
b
h
as educa
t
o
me respon
s
a
der of the
e
lite, execu
t
i
s sense. U
n
t
o expect u
n
r
i, & Temi
r
knowledg
e
d
eas; thus
c
a
bit, which
u
niversity
s
Y
ıldırı
m
, &
h
abit in Tu
r
E
ducation
2
327-5499
7, No. 2
r
othin
k
.org
n
uously,
o
f enjoy
arly and
o
r young
t
ary and
i
t. These
Mattoo,
e
nt. Both
S
tu
d
ents
d
ifferent
e
ading is
n
e’s own
b
ut once
r
tance of
a
z, 2018).
n
ing and
success
s
lost its
p
roblem
r
reading
s
for an
g
, regard
s in the
b
its and
t
ion and
s
ibilities
society;
t
ive and
n
iversity
n
iversity
r
, 2018).
e
. These
c
an be a
is very
s
tudents.
Kelleci,
r
key and
around
The st
u
acade
m
Owusu
-
perfor
m
Similar
of the
polytec
h
as they
Similar
In a st
u
student
s
Univer
s
magazi
n
seniors
showe
d
are tele
lack o
f
approx
i
less fre
and Po
l
the stu
d
1993 b
y
month,
youth’s
have a
r
their st
u
In addi
t
these s
Sallaba
writing
The ai
m
writing
1.2 Pro
Many
p
develo
p
media,
others
(
televisi
o
overall
student
s
the World.
u
dy sought
m
ic perform
a
-
Acheaw (
2
m
ance and
t
to this stu
d
students i
n
hnics stude
enjoy doin
g
to the stu
d
u
dy done at
s
had rea
d
s
ity studen
t
n
es out of
c
at 46 Phys
i
d
that stude
n
vision’s be
i
f
guidance
i
mately 58
%
quently an
d
l
at (2008),
i
d
y either n
e
y
Ministry
13.4%, re
a
was only
3
r
eading ha
b
u
dies and
m
t
ion to rea
d
tudies don
ş (2009) s
t
activities.
İ
m
of this r
e
attitudes o
n
blem State
m
p
arents an
d
p
ed readin
g
people do
n
(
Palani, 20
o
n, listenin
g
result of A
n
s
spend
q
In the follo
w
to assess
a
nce in Ko
f
2
014). The
t
here is a
r
d
y, Annam
a
n
a Malay
s
nts have lo
w
g
other tec
h
d
ies around
Middle Ea
s
d
ing habit
t
s, results r
e
c
ourse acti
v
i
cal Educat
i
n
ts don’t re
a
i
ng attracti
v
and etc.
%
of stude
n
d
only 3%
i
t can be u
n
e
ver read
b
of Nationa
l
a
d only on
e
3
7.1%. Th
i
b
it. Geçgel
a
m
ost of the s
d
ing habit l
e
’t focus o
n
t
udy comp
a
İ
şeri and Ü
n
e
search wa
n
their aca
d
m
ent
d
teachers
g
habits a
m
n
ot show
m
12). Espec
i
g
to audio-
C
n
namalai a
n
q
uite a s
i
w
ing part s
t
the readin
g
f
oridua Pol
y
study con
fi
r
elationship
a
lai and M
u
s
ian Polyt
e
w
interest i
n
h
nology rel
a
the World,
s
t Technica
l
(Gömleksi
z
e
vealed tha
t
v
ities (Yazı
i
on and Sp
o
a
d. Causes
o
v
e, high co
s
(Semerci,
2
n
ts read bo
o
of them n
e
n
derstood t
h
ook or rea
d
l
Educatio
n
e
book. An
i
s shows th
a
a
nd Burgul
tudents sta
t
e
vel studeis
n
e reading
a
red the at
t
n
al (2012)’
s
s to invest
i
d
emic achie
v
complain
m
ong thems
e
m
uch intere
s
i
ally stude
n
C
Ds, watch
n
d Munian
d
i
gnificant
46
t
udies don
e
g
habits a
m
y
technic si
t
fi
rmed that
between r
e
u
niandy (2
0
e
chnic. Re
s
n
reading;
(
a
ted activiti
e
there are
m
l
Universit
y
z
, 2004).
W
t
only %37
ı
cı, 2001).
A
o
rts Teachi
n
o
f students’
s
ts of book
s
2
002). Ya
y
o
k often or
e
ver read b
o
h
at approxi
m
d
maximu
m
n
, youths’ 6
n
other stud
y
at people
w
(2009) ask
e
t
ed that the
y
, there are
s
habit attit
u
t
itudes of t
e
s
study als
o
i
gate the i
m
v
ements.
about stu
d
e
lves. No
w
s
t in readi
n
n
ts prefer t
o
h
ing video-
C
d
y (2013)’
s
amount o
I
n
e
on readin
g
m
ong stude
n
t
uated in th
e
reading ha
b
e
ading hab
i
0
13) studie
d
ults of th
e
(
ii) student
s
e
s.
m
any studi
e
y
in 2000 s
h
W
hen we
l
of the stu
d
A
ccording
t
n
g Departm
e
not readin
g
s
, high loa
d
y
lalı et al.
always, 3
9
o
oks. From
m
ately hal
f
m
5 books.
1% didn’t
r
y
showed t
h
w
ho will ra
i
ed
students
y
don’t spe
n
s
ome attitu
d
u
des only.
e
acher can
d
o
focused o
n
m
pact of te
d
ents of o
u
w
adays, due
n
g books;
m
o
watch m
o
C
Ds, amon
g
s
tudy indic
a
f time s
u
n
ternational
R
g
habit will
b
n
ts and th
e
e
Eastern
R
b
it has infl
u
i
t an
d
aca
d
d
the readin
g
e
study re
v
do not enj
o
e
s done on
r
h
owed that
%
l
ooked at
t
d
ents prefer
t
o survey r
e
e
nts at 40 d
i
g
books out
d
ed progra
m
(2006)’s
s
9
% of stud
e
the study
o
of the stu
d
According
r
ead any b
o
h
at reading
i
se our ne
x
if they take
n
d not enou
g
d
es studies
For exam
p
d
idates rel
a
n
writing a
n
acher cand
i
u
r generat
i
to the inf
l
m
agazines a
n
o
vies and
o
g
others (Is
s
tes that Ma
u
rfing the
R
esearch in
E
ISSN
2
2019, Vol.
http://ire.mac
r
b
e presente
d
e
ir effects
R
egion of
G
u
ence on a
d
emic perf
o
g
habit an
d
v
ealed that
;
o
y reading
r
eading ha
b
%
21,6 of u
n
the study
r
reading b
o
e
sults of a
p
d
ifferent uni
v
of course
a
m
, disliking
s
tudy sho
w
e
nts someti
m
of Odabaş,
d
ents partic
i
to a study
o
ok for the
rates of u
n
x
t generatio
n
e
time off r
e
g
h time on
done in Tu
r
p
le, Temiz
k
a
te
d
to rea
d
n
d reading
a
d
idates' rea
d
i
on who
h
l
uence of t
h
n
d journals
o
ther show
s
s
a et al., 20
a
laysian pol
y
Internet,
E
ducation
2
327-5499
7, No. 2
r
othin
k
.org
d
.
on their
G
hana by
cademic
o
rmance.
d
attitude
;
(i) the
as much
b
it level.
n
iversity
of Gazi
o
oks and
p
plied to
v
ersities
a
ctivities
reading,
w
ed that
m
es and
Odabaş
i
pated to
done in
last one
n
iversity
n
s don’t
e
ading in
reading.
r
key but
k
an and
d
ing and
a
ttitudes.
d
ing and
h
ave not
h
e mass
, among
s
on the
1
2). The
y
technic
playing
compu
t
due to
l
source
o
Similar
have b
circum
s
and Tu
r
many s
t
Yaylalı
habits
o
of stud
e
few st
u
and its
e
1.3 Ai
m
Previo
u
a good
habit t
h
especia
transfe
r
acade
m
society
student
s
succes
s
differe
n
self-im
p
about e
f
2. Met
h
In this
will be
2.1 Res
This st
u
about r
e
descrip
t
to desc
r
individ
u
There i
s
2.2 Po
p
Popula
t
The to
t
t
er/mobile
g
l
ack of goo
d
o
f worry a
n
to the stud
i
een impor
t
s
tances, Tu
r
r
kish societ
t
udies don
e
et al., 200
6
o
f students
b
e
nts about
r
u
dies focusi
n
e
ffects on s
m
of the Stu
d
u
s studies s
h
reading ha
b
h
at affects
w
lly for uni
v
r
knowled
g
m
ic success.
and acade
m
s
’ opinions
s
will be e
x
n
ce betwee
n
p
rovement;
ffect of rea
d
h
od
section, re
s
presented.
earch Mod
e
u
dy, aimin
g
e
ading hab
i
t
ive model
r
ibe a pres
e
u
al or an o
b
s
no effort
t
p
ulation an
d
t
ion of the
s
t
al numbe
r
g
ames and
o
d
reading
h
n
d concern
f
i
es around
t
t
ant chang
e
r
kish peop
l
y don’t bri
n
e
in turkey
a
6
; Odabaş,
O
b
oth in Tu
r
r
eading an
d
n
g on reas
o
elf-improv
e
d
y
h
owed that
b
it. Readin
g
w
hole life
v
ersity stud
e
g
e, one sho
A person
m
ic achiev
e
about the
r
x
amined.
A
n
female
a
and b) is t
h
d
ing habit
o
s
earch mo
d
el
g
to determ
i
i
t and its’
e
of quantita
t
e
nt or past
s
b
ject are t
r
t
o change o
r
d
Sample
s
tudy is all
s
r
of stude
n
o
ther techn
o
h
abits amon
g
f
or all stake
t
he World,
s
e
s in Tur
k
l
e are not
o
n
g reading
a
a
bout the le
v
O
dabaş &
P
r
key and ar
o
d
the level
o
o
ns of not r
e
e
ment and
a
university
s
g
habit settl
e
of a perso
n
e
nts. To be
a
u
ld read
m
should im
p
e
ment is a
r
eading hab
i
A
dditional
r
a
nd male s
h
ere any di
f
o
n academi
c
d
el, sample
i
ne Pamuk
k
e
ffects on s
e
t
ive researc
h
s
ituation as
r
ied to be
d
r
affect the
m
s
tudents of
P
n
ts at Facu
l
47
o
logy-relat
e
g students,
e
holders in
t
s
tudies don
e
k
ish societ
y
o
n good ter
m
a
s a habit a
vel of read
i
P
olat, 2008
)
o
und the
W
o
f students’
e
ading and
a
cademic li
v
s
tudents do
n
ed into at e
n
. Thus, re
a
a
ble to und
e
m
ore and
m
p
rove ones
e
must for
p
i
t and its’ e
r
esearch q
u
tudents op
i
fference be
c
success.
of the stu
d
k
ale Univer
elf-improv
e
h
. “Desript
i
so. Subjec
t
d
escribed
w
m
anyhow
(
P
amukkale
u
lty of edu
c
I
n
e
d activities
academic
p
t
he educati
o
e
in Turke
y
y
within s
o
m
s with b
o
n
d lifestyle
i
ng habit (
G
)
. There are
W
orld. Thes
e
reading h
a
opinions o
f
v
es. This st
u
n
’t read en
o
arly ages o
f
a
ding habi
t
e
rstand wh
a
m
ore which
e
lf to be a
b
p
rofessiona
l
ffects on s
e
u
estions ar
e
i
nions abo
u
tween fem
a
d
y, data col
l
sity Educa
t
e
ment and
a
i
ve models
t
s of a rese
a
w
ithin its’ o
w
(
Karasar, 2
0
University
,
c
ation is
2
n
ternational
R
compared
t
p
erformanc
e
o
nal area (I
s
also show
e
o
cial, econ
o
o
oks, news
p
. As discus
s
G
ömleksiz,
2
many stud
i
studies fo
c
b
its. Howe
v
f
students’
a
u
dy aimed
o
o
ugh book
a
f
an indivi
d
t
is very i
m
a
t you read,
yields sel
f
b
le to have
life. In th
i
e
lf-improve
m
e
as follo
w
u
t effect o
f
a
le and mal
l
ection and
ion Facult
y
a
cademic s
u
a
re researc
h
a
rch such a
s
w
n circums
0
00, 77).
Faculty o
f
2
2,345 at
p
R
esearch in
E
ISSN
2
2019, Vol.
http://ire.mac
r
to reading.
e
is creatin
g
s
sa et al., 2
0
e
d that eve
n
o
mic and
p
apers and
sed above
t
2
004; Yazı
c
i
es done o
n
c
used on th
v
er, there
a
about readi
o
t fill this g
a
nd they d
o
d
ual, howe
v
m
portant fo
r
analyze, c
r
f
-improve
m
a good pl
a
is study, u
n
m
ent and a
w
s; a) is t
h
f
reading
h
l
e students
o
d
analysis p
r
y
students’
o
u
ccess, is
b
h
approach
e
s
a phenom
e
s
tances and
f
Education
p
resent (20
E
ducation
2
327-5499
7, No. 2
r
othin
k
.org
Perhaps,
g
a great
0
12).
n
if there
political
j
ournals
t
here are
c
ı, 2001;
n
reading
e
choice
r
e many
ng habit
a
p.
o
n’t have
v
er it is a
r
people
r
itic, and
m
ent and
a
ce in a
n
iversity
c
ademic
h
ere any
h
abit on
o
pinions
r
ocesses
o
pinions
b
ased on
e
s aimed
e
non, an
as it is.
students.
18-2019
acade
m
whole
b
missin
g
univers
248 pa
r
and 81
w
Tabl e 1
Valid
Partici
p
of the
m
mathe
m
Tabl e 2
Valid
2.3 Da
t
As a
d
Readin
g
scale a
n
reliabil
i
Since t
e
self-de
v
2.4 Re
a
In term
test of
was .8
6
m
ic years).
A
b
achelor st
u
g
surveys 2
4
ity student
s
r
ticipants
w
w
ere male
(
. Gender o
f
.0
0
Fe
m
M
a
To
p
ants of the
m
were stu
d
m
atics and 5
. Departme
n
P
M
E
T
t
a Collectio
d
ata collect
i
g
Habit” d
e
n
d there
w
i
ty coeffici
e
e
h aim of t
h
v
elopment
a
a
libility of t
h
s of the rel
i
Coefficien
t
6
2 which s
h
A
ccording
u
dents sho
u
4
8 surveys
s
at Pamuk
k
w
ere partici
p
(
32.7%) an
d
f
participan
t
0
m
ale
a
le
tal
study wer
e
d
ying at ps
y
5 (22.2%)
o
n
t of partic
i
P
cg
M
ath
E
nglish
T
otal
n Tool
i
on tool 5
e
veloped b
y
w
ere 21 po
s
e
nt of the
s
h
is study
w
a
nd aademi
c
h
e Current
S
i
ability of t
h
t
Alpha (C
r
h
ows that th
to survey’
s
ld be 230 (
Ç
were appli
e
k
ale Univer
s
p
ated to the
d
4 (51.6)
w
t
s
Fr
e
4
16
3
81
24
8
e
from diff
e
y
chological
o
f them at
E
i
pants
F
1
5
5
2
point like
r
y
Gömleks
i
s
itive, 9 ne
g
s
cale was f
o
w
as only de
t
c
success, 1
S
tudy
h
e question
r
onbach’s
a
e survey w
a
48
s
0.95 reli
a
Çıngı, 199
0
e
d to stude
n
s
ity, Educa
t
study. 168
w
as missing
e
quency
3
8
e
rent depar
t
counseling
E
nglish tea
c
F
requency
1
38
5
5
5
5
2
48
r
t scale sur
iz (2004),
w
g
ative attit
u
fo
und as .8
8
t
ermine the
0 question
s
n
naire in tot
a
a
lpha) was
a
s reliable.
I
n
a
nce and 0.
0
, s. 256).
B
n
ts. Thus,
t
t
ion Facult
y
of the par
t
(See Table
t
ments of E
and guida
n
c
hing depar
t
v
ey was u
s
w
as used.
3
u
de items
i
8
. There w
e
reading h
a
s
related to
t
a
l and eac
h
conducted.
At the end
n
ternational
R
0
5 toleran
c
B
y taking i
n
t
he sample
y
.
t
icipants’ w
e
1).
Per
c
1.6
65.
7
32.
7
100
.
d
ucation F
a
n
ce depart
m
t
ment (See
T
Perce
n
55.6
22.2
22.2
100.0
s
ed. “Attit
u
3
0 items
w
i
n the scal
e
e
re 6 dime
n
a
bit opinio
n
t
hese dime
n
item separ
a
The Cron
b
of reliabili
t
R
esearch in
E
ISSN
2
2019, Vol.
http://ire.mac
r
c
e level, s
a
n
to conside
r
of the stud
y
ere female
c
ent
7
7
.0
a
culty. 138
m
ent, 55 (2
2
T
able 2).
n
t
u
de Scale
T
w
ere chose
n
e
. Cronbac
h
n
sions of t
h
n
s and its e
f
n
sions were
r
ately, the r
e
n
bach’s Alp
t
y analysis
1
E
ducation
2
327-5499
7, No. 2
r
othin
k
.org
a
mple of
r
ation of
y
is 248
(65.7%)
(55.6%)
2
.2%) at
T
owards
n
for the
h
Alpha
h
e scale.
f
fects on
chosen.
e
liability
h
a level
1
0 items
were u
s
self-im
p
2.5 Da
t
Data
w
student
s
told th
a
to part
i
survey
l
2.6 Da
t
SPSS 1
used; f
o
for des
c
b
y step
3. Fin
d
In this
results
w
Tabl e 3
Totally
d
Disagre
e
Partially
Agree
Totally a
Tota l
Most o
f
totally
a
(see Ta
b
s
ed for eva
l
p
rovement
a
t
a Collectio
w
as collecte
d
s
at the en
d
a
t participat
i
i
cipate. So
m
l
asted alm
o
t
a Analysis
1
7 was use
d
o
r descripti
v
c
ribing rela
t
in the foll
o
d
in
g
s
section, fr
e
w
ill be giv
e
. Question
6
d
isagree
e
agree
a
gree
f
the stude
n
a
greed whi
l
b
le 3).
l
uation. Th
e
a
nd the res
t
n Process
d
at fall se
m
d
of course
i
on to the s
t
m
e student
s
o
st half an h
d
to analyz
e
v
e statistics
t
ions correl
o
wing secti
o
e
quencies o
e
n. Results
o
6
: Reading
n
ts agree th
a
l
e 27.8% o
f
e
se ten ite
m
t
is related t
m
ester of
2
time at cl
a
t
udy is bas
e
went out
a
our.
e
the data.
of persona
l
ation and t
o
n.
f each que
s
o
f the stud
y
helps expr
e
a
t reading
m
f
them agr
e
49
m
s were div
t
o academi
c
2
018-2019
a
a
ssrooms t
h
e
d on volu
n
a
nd the re
s
To an alyz
e
l
features f
r
test techni
c
s
tion will
b
y
are as foll
o
e
ssing feeli
n
Freq
u
2
3
14
69
160
248
m
akes expr
e
e
e. There
w
I
n
ided into t
w
success.
a
cademic
y
h
ey have b
e
n
tary basis
a
s
t filled in
q
e
the data t
h
r
equency (f
)
c
s were use
d
b
e presente
d
o
ws;
n
gs easie
r
u
ency
e
ssing feeli
n
w
ere very fe
w
n
ternational
R
w
o as; the
f
ears. Surv
e
e
en though
t
a
nd they ha
d
q
uestionnai
h
ese statist
i
)
and perce
n
d
. These wi
d
. Later co
r
P
e
.8
1.
5.
2
7
6
4
1
0
n
gs easier.
6
w
students
R
esearch in
E
ISSN
2
2019, Vol.
http://ire.mac
r
f
irst 5 are r
e
e
ys were a
p
t
. Participa
n
d
a chance
i
res. Appli
c
i
cal proces
s
n
t (%) tech
n
i
ll be prese
n
r
relations a
n
e
rcent
8
2
6
7
.8
4
.5
0
0.0
6
4.5% of th
e
who were
E
ducation
2
327-5499
7, No. 2
r
othin
k
.org
e
lated to
p
plied to
n
ts were
to reject
c
ation of
s
es were
n
ics, and
n
ted step
n
d t test
e
m were
d
isagree
Tabl e 4
Totally
Disagr
e
Partiall
Agree
Totally
Tota l
Again
m
while
7
4).
Tabl e 5
Totally
Disagr
e
Partiall
y
Agree
Totally
Tota l
Most
o
totally
disagre
e
Tabl e 6
Missin
g
Totally
Disagr
e
Partiall
y
Agree
Totally
Tota l
Almost
. Question
7
disagree
e
e
l
y agree
agree
m
ost of th
e
7
0 (% 28.2)
. Question
8
disagree
e
e
y
agree
agree
o
f the stud
e
agree, 62 (
e
with this
s
. Question
9
g
disagree
e
e
y
agree
agree
100% of
7
: Reading
e
students
w
of them w
e
8
: Reading
e
nts think
t
25%) are
a
s
entence (S
9
: Reading
participant
s
p
rovides u
n
w
ere agree
w
e
re agree.
O
creates m
u
Frequen
c
1
2
9
62
174
248
t
hat readin
g
a
gree and 9
e
e Table 5)
.
u
nwraps th
e
s
agreed t
h
50
n
derstandin
g
Frequ
e
1
4
9
70
164
248
with this s
e
O
nly 5 (%2
)
u
ltiple think
cy
g
creates
m
(3.6%) ar
e
.
e unknown
Freq
u
1
1
2
10
57
177
248
h
at reading
I
n
g
others an
d
e
ncy
e
ntence. 16
)
of all stu
d
ing skills
m
ultiple thi
n
e
partially
a
World to u
s
u
ency
unwrap th
e
n
ternational
R
d
whole W
o
Per
c
.4
1.6
3.6
28.
2
66.
1
10
0
4 (% 66.1)
d
ents were
d
Percent
.4
.8
3.6
25.0
70.2
100.0
n
king skill
s
a
gree. Onl
y
s
Pe
r
.4
.4
.8
4.
0
23
71
10
0
e
unknow
n
R
esearch in
E
ISSN
2
2019, Vol.
http://ire.mac
r
o
rl
d
r
cent
2
1
0
.0
)
were total
d
isagree (S
e
s
. 174 (70.
2
y
3 (1.2%)
rcent
0
.0
.4
0.0
n
World to
E
ducation
2
327-5499
7, No. 2
r
othin
k
.org
ly agree
e
e Table
2
%) are
students
us. 244
(98.4%
)
disagre
e
Tabl e 7
Totally
Disagr
e
Partiall
y
Agree
Totally
Tota l
As pre
v
that re
a
in deta
i
agree (
S
Tabl e 8
Missi
n
Totall
y
Disag
r
Partial
l
Agree
Totall
y
Tota l
Unlike
(58.9%
)
partiall
y
disagre
e
)
of all p
a
e
that readi
n
. Question
disagree
e
e
y
agree
agree
v
ious quest
i
a
ding differ
e
i
l, 177 (71.
4
S
ee Table 7
)
. Question
n
g
y
disagree
r
ee
l
y agree
y
agree
previous q
u
)
of partici
p
y
agree, 3
(
e
with the
s
a
rticipants
a
n
g unwrap
t
10: Readin
g
i
ons, partic
e
nt kinds o
f
4
%) were t
o
)
.
11: Readin
g
u
estions, n
u
p
ants were
(
1.2%) of t
h
s
entence of
r
a
re agree
w
t
he unkno
w
g
different
k
ipants agre
e
f
books cha
n
o
tally agree
g
book gain
s
u
mber of st
u
totally agr
e
h
em were d
i
r
eading bo
o
51
w
ith this
s
w
n World to
k
inds of bo
o
Freq
u
2
4
10
55
177
248
ed with thi
n
ges their p
e
, 55 (22.2
%
s us quick
t
Freque
n
1
1
3
17
80
146
248
u
dents wh
o
e
e, 80 (32.
3
i
sagree an
d
o
k gains us
I
n
s
entence.
O
them (See
T
o
ks change
s
ency
s sentence.
oint of vie
w
%
) were agr
e
t
hinking ha
b
n
cy
o
are totally
3
%) studen
t
d
only 1 (0.
4
quick thin
k
n
ternational
R
O
nly 3 (1.2
T
able 6).
s
our point
o
Pe
r
.8
1.
6
4.
0
22.
71.
10
0
97% of th
e
w
toward li
f
e
e, and 10
(
b
it
Per
c
.4
.4
1.2
6.9
32.
3
58.
9
100
.
agreed, is
t
s were agr
e
4
%) of part
i
ing habit (s
R
esearch in
E
ISSN
2
2019, Vol.
http://ire.mac
r
2
%) of par
t
o
f view to
w
r
cent
6
0
.
2
.
4
0
.0
e
participa
n
f
e. When w
e
(
4%) were
p
c
ent
3
9
.0
a little bit
l
e
e, 17 (6.9
%
icipants w
a
s
ee Ta
b
le 8)
E
ducation
2
327-5499
7, No. 2
r
othin
k
.org
t
icipants
w
ard life
n
ts think
e
look at
p
artially
l
ow. 146
%
) were
a
s totally
.
Tabl e 9
Totall
y
Disag
r
Partial
Agree
Totall
y
Tota l
Like o
t
synthe
s
and 5
disagre
e
Tabl e 1
Totally
Disagr
e
Partiall
y
Agree
Totally
Tota l
Totally
the par
t
agree.
D
disagre
e
Tabl e 1
Totally
Disagr
e
Partiall
y
Agree
Totally
Tota l
. Question
y
disagree
r
ee
ly agree
y
agree
t
her respo
n
s
es and inte
r
(2%) were
e
d with thi
s
0. Questio
n
disagree
e
e
y
agree
agree
agree stud
e
t
icipants w
e
D
isagreed
e
and 2 (0.
8
1. Questio
n
disagree
e
e
y
agree
agree
12: Readin
g
n
ses, partic
i
r
pretation.
1
partially
a
s
opinion (s
e
n
13: Readi
n
e
nts to this
s
e
re totally
participant
s
8
%) were t
o
n
14: Regul
a
g
book imp
r
i
pants agre
e
1
59 (64.1%
)
a
gree. On
t
e
e Ta
b
le 9)
.
n
g skill pos
i
s
entence ar
e
agreed. 75
s
were a
b
o
tally disag
r
a
r reading i
n
52
r
oves abilit
y
Freque
n
1
4
5
79
159
248
e
d with re
a
) students
w
the other
h
.
i
tively affe
c
Freq
u
2
7
27
75
137
248
e
a bit low
e
(30.2%)
w
b
it higher
t
r
ee with the
n
creases ac
a
Freque
n
3
6
33
71
135
248
I
n
y
of analysi
n
cy
a
ding boo
k
w
ere totally
h
and, only
c
ts success
o
u
ency
e
r than prev
i
w
ere agree
a
t
han previ
o
sentence (
S
a
demic suc
c
n
cy
n
ternational
R
s, synthese
s
Per
c
.4
1.6
2.0
31.
9
64.
1
100
.
k
improve
a
agree, 79 (
3
5 (2%) o
f
o
n examina
Pe
r
.8
2.
8
10
.
30
.
55
.
10
0
i
ous questi
o
a
nd 27 (10.
o
us questio
n
S
ee Table 1
0
c
ess
Per
c
1.2
2.4
13.
3
28.
6
54.
4
100
R
esearch in
E
ISSN
2
2019, Vol.
http://ire.mac
r
s
and inter
p
c
ent
9
1
.0
ability of
a
31.9%) we
r
f
participa
n
a
tions
r
cent
8
.9
.2
.2
0.0
o
ns. 137 (5
5
.
9%) were
p
n
s. 7 (2.8
%
0
).
c
ent
3
6
4
0
.0
E
ducation
2
327-5499
7, No. 2
r
othin
k
.org
p
retatio
n
a
nalysis,
r
e agree,
n
ts were
5
.2%) of
p
artially
%
) were
Questi
o
disagre
e
acade
m
Tabl e 1
Totally
Disagr
e
Partiall
y
Agree
Totally
Tota l
Even i
f
meanin
Howev
e
since t
h
After f
r
Tabl e 1
student
s
Group
Female
Male
After a
n
b
een f
o
242
= 4.
8
male st
u
Tabl e 1
male st
u
Group
Female
Male
o
n 14’s res
p
e
and the
r
m
ic success.
2. Questio
n
disagree
e
e
y
agree
agree
f
there are
g of the s
e
r, there ar
e
h
ey don’t h
a
r
equency re
3. T test r
e
s
N
1
6
8
1
n
alysis of
c
o
und that t
h
8
29). Accor
d
u
dents’ rea
d
4. T test re
s
u
dents
N
1
6
8
1
p
onses are
r
est of the
p
n
15: Since
I
most stude
n
entence. S
i
e
98 (39.6
%
a
ve reading
sults were
p
e
sults for r
e
M
e
6
3 4.
4
1
4.
0
c
omparison
h
ere is a di
ff
d
ing to this
d
ing habit l
e
s
ults for ac
a
M
e
6
3 4.
1
1
3.
8
similar to
p
articipants
I
don’t hav
e
n
ts who w
e
i
nce the
m
%
) students
habit (See
T
p
resented a
b
e
ading hab
i
e
a
n
4
245
0
889
of self-im
p
ff
erence bet
w
, female st
u
e
vel (x
= 4.
0
a
demic suc
c
e
a
n
1
227
8
346
53
Question 1
(94.6%)
w
e
reading h
a
Frequen
65
85
56
21
21
248
e
re disagre
e
m
eaning is
n
who were
a
T
abel 12).
b
ove, t test
a
i
t: Compar
i
Std. Dev
i
.41605
.66351
p
rovement
h
w
een male
u
dents’ rea
d
0
889) (See
t
c
ess: Com
p
Std. Dev
i
.50152
.71259
I
n
3. There a
r
w
ere agree
w
a
bit, I have
cy
e
with this
n
egative, r
a
gree that t
h
a
nalysis st
a
i
son of rea
d
i
ation
h
abit of fe
m
and femal
e
d
ing habit l
e
t
able 13).
p
arison of a
c
i
ation
n
ternational
R
r
e 9 (3.6%
)
w
ith regula
d
ifficulties
P
e
2
6
3
4
2
2
8
.
8
.
1
0
sentence,
i
e
sponses
w
h
ey have d
i
t
istics will
b
d
ing habit
o
t
4.
8
m
ale and
m
e
students’
r
e
vel (x
= 4.
4
c
ademic su
c
t
3.
6
R
esearch in
E
ISSN
2
2019, Vol.
http://ire.mac
r
) students
w
a
r reading i
n
on exams
ercent
6
.2
4
.3
2
.6
.5
.5
0
0.0
i
t is becau
s
w
ere also
n
i
fficulties o
n
b
e presente
o
f female
a
8
29
m
ale studen
t
r
eading ha
b
4
245) is hi
g
c
cess of fe
m
6
55
E
ducation
2
327-5499
7, No. 2
r
othin
k
.org
w
ho are
n
creases
e of the
n
egative.
n
exams
d.
n
d male
df
242
t
s, it has
b
it (t
0.05:
g
her than
m
ale and
df
242
After a
n
found t
3.655).
student
s
4. Disc
u
Curren
t
and its
Edcuat
i
Habit”
analysi
s
there a
r
Demir’
s
levels
a
Even t
h
(Odaba
readin
g
have a
self-de
v
(2010)’
Freque
n
themse
l
Also re
b
e able
more
self-im
p
too m
u
self-im
p
helps t
h
succes
s
althou
g
that th
e
The ha
l
have d
i
they a
g
Owusu
-
influen
c
acade
m
When
w
succes
s
show t
h
acade
m
n
alysis of
c
t
hat there i
s
According
s
’ reading
h
u
ssion and
t
study aim
e
’ effects
o
i
on faculty
s
developed
s
, it has be
e
r
e differen
c
s
(2015) s
t
a
re more po
s
h
ough pre
v
ş, Odabaş,
g
habit (Sa
ğ
good read
i
v
eleopment
s study s
u
n
cy results
l
ves easier,
ading crea
t
to underst
a
and mor
e
p
rovement
u
ch and
p
rovement.
h
em to be
s
on exami
n
g
h they are
a
e
y don’t re
a
l
f of the st
u
i
fficulties o
n
g
reed that
t
-
Acheaw (
c
e on acad
e
m
ic perform
a
w
e look at
c
s
and self-i
m
h
at female
m
ic success
m
c
omparison
s
a differen
c
to this, fe
m
h
abit level (
x
Conclusio
n
e
d to deter
m
o
n self-imp
r
s
tudents w
e
by Göml
e
e
n found th
a
c
es betwee
n
t
udy show
e
s
itive than
m
v
ious studi
e
& Polat, 2
0
ğ
lam, Suna
&
i
ng habit;
h
and acade
u
pports thi
s
showed th
a
understan
d
t
es new ski
l
a
nd what y
o
e
which
frequency
r
they don’
For acade
m
successful.
n
ations and
a
greed that
a
d much. T
h
u
dents was
a
n
exams”.
T
t
hey cann
o
2014)’ s s
t
e
mic perfo
r
a
nce.
c
orrelation
m
proveme
n
students b
e
m
ore than
m
of acade
m
c
e betwee
n
m
ale student
x
= 3.8346)
n
m
ine educat
i
r
ovement
a
e
re particip
a
e
ksiz (2004
a
t universit
y
n
female
a
d that fem
a
m
ale stude
n
e
s showed
0
08) and p
r
&
Çengelc
i
h
owever, th
e
mic succe
s
s
result by
a
t students
a
d
the world
l
ls, changes
o
u read, an
a
yields se
l
r
esults rev
e
t have r
e
m
ic success
For exam
p
regular rea
d
reading ha
b
h
is result c
a
a
greed with
T
hey know
o
t do well
t
udy confir
m
r
mance an
d
results of t
h
n
t female p
a
e
lieve that
r
m
ale stude
n
54
m
ic success
n
male and
t
s’ reading
h
(see Ta
b
le
1
i
on faculty
a
nd acade
m
a
ted to teh
s
) was use
d
y
students a
r
a
nd male s
t
ale univer
s
n
ts.
that unive
r
imary edu
c
i
, 2007); it
e
y are awa
r
s
s accordin
g
indicating
a
re mostly
a
d
they lived
s
their poin
t
a
lyze, critic
,
l
f-improve
m
e
aled that e
e
ading ha
b
frequency
r
p
le they a
g
d
ing incre
a
b
it increas
e
a
n be concl
u
h
the Questi
o
w
the effect
on exams
m
ed this r
e
d
there is
a
h
e study, t-
t
a
rticipants
h
r
eading ha
b
n
ts. This sh
o
I
n
of female
a
female stu
d
h
abit level (
x
1
4).
students’ o
p
m
ic succes
s
s
tudy and
A
d
as a dat
a
r
e aware o
f
t
udents’ o
p
s
ity student
s
rsity stude
n
c
ation teac
h
can be sai
d
r
e of the i
m
g
to the fi
n
that stude
n
a
greed that
and unwr
a
t
of view.
T
,
and trans
fe
m
ent an
d
v
enthough
b
its they
r
esults aga
i
g
reed that
r
ses acade
m
e
s academi
c
u
ded from
t
o
n 15 “Sin
c
of reading
since the
y
e
sult by in
d
a
relations
h
t
est results
h
ave highe
r
b
it is impo
r
o
ws us tha
t
n
ternational
R
a
nd male s
t
d
ents’ readi
n
x
= 4.1227)
p
inions abo
u
s
. 248 Pa
m
t
titude Sca
l
a
collectio
n
f
the import
a
inions. Si
m
s
’ reading
s
n
ts have l
o
h
er candid
a
d
that unive
r
m
portance
o
n
dings of t
h
n
ts see rea
d
reading he
l
a
p the wo
r
l
d
T
he results
s
e
r knowled
g
academic
university
s
believe t
h
n students
b
eading ski
l
m
ic success.
success th
e
t
he last que
c
e I don’t h
a
b
ut they d
o
y
don’t ha
v
d
icating tha
t
ip betwee
n
showed th
a
r
m
ean tha
n
r
tant on sel
f
reading is
R
esearch in
E
ISSN
2
2019, Vol.
http://ire.mac
r
t
udents, it
h
ng habit (t
is higher t
h
ut the read
i
m
ukkale U
n
l
e Towards
n
tool. Aft
e
a
nce of rea
d
m
ilar to thi
skills and
a
o
w readin
g
a
tes have “
a
rsity stude
n
o
f reading
f
h
is study.
B
d
ign as a n
l
ps them to
d they don
s
upport the
g
e, one sh
o
success”
.
students d
o
h
at readin
g
b
elieve tha
t
l
l positivel
y
On the ot
h
e
y couldn’
t
e
stion of th
e
ave readin
g
o
n’t read
m
v
e a readi
n
a
t reading
h
n
reading h
a
a
t both in a
n
males. T
h
f-improve
m
more impo
E
ducation
2
327-5499
7, No. 2
r
othin
k
.org
h
as been
0.05: 242
=
h
an male
i
ng habit
n
iversity
R
eading
e
r SPSS
d
ing and
s result,
a
ttitudes
culture
a
varage”
n
ts don’t
f
or their
B
ozpolat
e
cessity.
express
’t know.
idea “to
uld read
Thus,
o
n’t read
g
helps
t
reading
y
affects
h
er hand,
t
confess
e
survey.
g
habit, I
m
uch that
n
g habit.
h
abit has
a
bit and
cademic
h
us, this
m
ent and
rtant for
female
They a
l
Also,
D
male s
t
study.
F
readin
g
In shor
t
study.
U
studies
readin
g
In conl
u
succce
s
they d
o
Annam
student
s
Respo
n
read to
were
n
impres
s
gained
studies
,
b
e stud
i
to enur
e
Refere
n
Annam
Polyte
c
Bashir,
Amon
g
1-5.
Bozpol
a
(Case
o
411-42
8
Çıngı,
H
Çoban,
univers
50-69.
Dadzie
,
20(1),
1
than male
l
so found
o
D
emir (201
5
t
udents. O
n
F
or examp
l
g
and writin
g
r
t, there ar
e
U
nder any
done on th
i
g
habit amo
n
u
sion, univ
e
s
s. At this
p
o
n’t read o
r
alai and
M
s
do not en
j
n
sibility fal
l
when they
n
ot. Also,
s
ionable ag
at early ag
,
the reason
s
i
ed. Also, s
t
e
students r
e
n
ces
alai, S.,
&
c
hnic stude
n
I., & Mat
t
g
Adolesce
n
a
t, E. (201
0
o
f Cumhu
r
8
.
H
. (1990).
Ö
A., İleri,
T
ity student
,
P. S. (200
8
1
-14. https:
/
students. T
o
ut that fe
m
5
) conclude
d
n
the other
h
l
e, results
o
g
attitudes
a
e
some stu
d
circumsta
n
i
s issue an
d
n
g universi
t
e
rsity stud
e
p
oint, there
r
don’t ha
v
M
uniandy’s
j
oy reading
l
s into edu
c
were child
r
Greene (2
0
e in schoo
l
es, then th
e
s
why thes
e
t
udies with
e
ading as a
&
Muniand
y
n
ts.
I
nterna
t
t
oo, N. H.
n
ts (14-19)
0
). An asse
r
iyet Univ
e
Ö
rnekleme
K
T
., & Temi
r
s: Americ
a
8
). Readin
g
/
/doi.org/10
h
is result
w
m
ale stude
n
d
in his stu
d
h
and, tehre
o
f the stud
a
re not sign
i
d
ies suppor
t
ces, readin
g
d
should be
t
y students.
e
nts believe
is a proble
m
v
e reading
study reve
a
as much a
s
c
ational ex
p
r
en have m
o
0
01) state
d
l
, but once
e
responsib
i
e
students d
o
education
a
habit.
y
, B. (201
t
ional Onli
n
(2012). A
S
years.
I
nte
r
ssment of
p
e
rsity Edu
c
K
uramı. A
n
r
, M. (2018
)
a
n Univers
i
g
for Educa
t
.4314/glj.v
2
55
w
as supoor
t
n
ts spend
m
d
y that fem
a
e
are some
d
y of Ünal
n
ificant pre
d
t
ing and s
o
g habit is
a
done more
e
that readi
n
m
here. If
t
habit as p
r
a
led that s
t
s
they enjo
y
p
erts. Kubi
s
ore positiv
e
d
that rea
d
formed it
i
lity falls i
n
o
n’t read a
n
a
list and pa
r
3).
Readi
n
n
e Journal
o
S
tudy on
S
r
national J
o
p
rospective
c
ation Fac
u
n
kara: Hace
t
)
. A contin
u
i
ty sample.
t
ion: The r
o
2
0i1.33978
I
n
t
ed by Oda
b
m
ore time o
a
le student
s
studies not
and İşeri
(
d
ictors of th
e
o
me not su
p
a
must for
to underst
a
n
g habit in
c
t
hese stude
n
r
evious stu
d
t
udents ha
v
y
doing oth
e
s
(1996) ju
s
e
attitudes
t
d
ing habit
can last o
n
n
to educati
o
n
d why the
y
r
ents can b
e
g habit a
n
o
f Educatio
n
S
tudy Habi
t
o
urnal of
S
teachers’
a
u
lty). Jour
n
t
tepe Üniv
e
u
ous overv
The Jour
n
o
les of Lib
r
n
ternational
R
b
aş, Odaba
ş
n
reading
t
love readi
n
supportin
g
(
2012) indi
c
e
ir academ
i
p
porting th
e
people. T
h
a
nd the reas
o
reases thei
r
n
ts know t
h
d
ies stated
e low inte
r
e
r technolo
g
s
tifies that
oward rea
d
is best f
o
n
e’s life ti
m
o
nalist and
y
cannot ga
i
e
done to fi
n
n
d attitude
n
al Science
s
t
s and Aca
d
o
cial Scien
a
ttitudes to
w
n
al of Wo
r
rsitesi.
i
ew of boo
k
n
al of Soc
i
r
aries. Gha
n
R
esearch in
E
ISSN
2
2019, Vol.
http://ire.mac
r
ş
and Pola
t
t
han male
s
n
g books
m
g
the result
s
cated that
i
c achieve
m
e
results o
f
h
er had be
e
ons of not
h
r
self and a
h
e reality, t
h
such as r
e
r
est in rea
d
g
y related a
c
students w
d
ing than th
o
rmed at
a
m
e. If readi
n
parents. F
o
i
n reading
h
n
d out wha
t
among
M
e
s, 5(1), 32-
4
d
emic Perf
o
ce Tomorr
o
w
ards readi
n
r
ld of Tur
k
k reading
h
ial Scienc
e
n
a Library
J
E
ducation
2
327-5499
7, No. 2
r
othin
k
.org
t
(2008).
s
tudents.
m
ore than
s
of this
students
m
ents.
f
current
e
n many
h
aving a
c
ademic
h
en why
e
sults of
d
ing and
c
tivities.
h
o were
o
se who
a
young
n
g habit
o
r future
h
abit can
t
they do
alaysian
4
1.
o
rmance
o
w, 1(5),
n
g habit
k
s, 2(1),
h
abits of
e
, 5(19).
J
ournal,
Deaver
s
of Rese
a
Demir,
Ulusla
r
Geçgel
,
B
ilim,
2
Gömle
k
güveni
r
Greene
,
Journa
l
Issa, A
Habits
Develo
p
İşeri,
K
Değişk
e
8(2), 6
7
Karasa
r
Korkm
a
univers
1-19. h
t
Kubis,
M
readin
g
from w
w
Odabaş
Ankara
Owusu
-
Perfor
m
Practic
Palani,
R
efere
n
Sağla
m
Progra
m
Sınıf Ö
ğ
Semer
c
okuma
Solma
z
s
, R. (2000
)
a
rch in Re
a
S. (2015).
r
arası Türk
ç
,
H., & Bu
r
2
(3), 341-3
5
k
siz, M. N.
r
liği. Fırat
Ü
,
B. (2001
)
l
of Resear
c
. O., Aliy
u
of the
F
p
ment, 2(1)
K
. & Ünal,
E
e
nler Açısı
n
7
-76.
r
, N. (2000)
a
z, M., Ar
a
ity student
s
t
tps://doi.o
r
M
. (1996).
g
in ninthgr
a
w
w.eric.ed.
ş
, H., Odab
a
Üniversite
s
-
Acheaw,
M
m
ance: A
S
e (e-
j
ourna
K. K. (20
1
n
ce Researc
h
m
, M., Sun
a
m
ları Öğre
n
ğ
retmenliği
c
i, Ç. (200
2
alışkanlıkl
a
z
, M. (2018
)
)
. The Effe
c
a
ding, 23, 2
6
An evalua
t
ç
e Edebiya
t
r
gul, F. (20
0
5
3.
(2004). K
i
Ü
niversites
i
)
. Testing
R
c
h in Readi
n
u
, M. B., A
k
F
ederal Po
l
, 470-486.
h
E
. (2012). T
ü
n
dan İncel
e
.
B
ilimsel
A
a
s, G., Çel
e
s
reading h
a
r
g/10.1735
9
The relati
o
a
ders. ERI
C
gov/ERIC
W
a
ş, Z. Y.,
&
s
i örneği.
B
M
. (2014).
S
tudy of
S
l). http://di
g
1
2). Promis
i
h
Journal,
3
a
, Ç., & Ç
e
n
cilerinin
O
Sempozyu
m
2
). Türk ü
n
a
rı. Eğitim
v
)
. A study
a
c
t of Instru
c
6
7-286. htt
p
t
ion in rea
d
t
Kültür Eğ
i
0
9). Eğitim
i
tap okuma
i
Sosyal Bil
i
R
eading C
o
n
g, 24(1), 3
2
k
angbe, R.
l
ytechnic
S
h
ttps://doi.
o
ü
rkçe Öğre
t
e
nmesi.
M
e
r
A
raştırma
Yö
e
bi, N., &
G
a
bits.
I
ntern
a
9
/ACED.20
1
nship betw
e
C
Docume
n
W
ebPortal/r
e
&
Polat, C.
ilgi Dünya
s
Reading H
S
tudents o
f
g
italcomm
o
i
ng Readin
g
3
(2), 91.
e
ngelci, T.
O
kuma Alı
m
u, 27-29
N
n
iversiteleri
n
v
e Bilim, 2
7
a
bout readi
n
56
c
tion on Ea
r
p
s://doi.org
/
d
ing skills
a
i
tim Dergis
i
fakültesi
ö
alışkanlığı
n
i
mler Derg
i
o
mprehensi
o
2
-98. https:
B., & Ad
e
Students.
I
o
rg/10.529
6
t
men Aday
l
r
sin Unive
r
Yö
ntemi. (10
G
ürkan, A.
ational Jou
1
5510150
een home l
i
n
t Reprodu
c
ecordDetai
l
(2008). Ü
n
s
ı, 9(2), 43
1
H
abits Amo
n
f
Koforidu
a
o
ns.unl.edu
/
g
Habits a
n
(2007). S
ı
şkanlığı D
ü
N
isan 2006,
nde Beden
7
, 36-43.
n
g habits o
f
I
n
r
ly Non-Wo
/
10.1111/1
4
a
nd habitu
d
i
, 4(4). 165
7
ö
ğrencilerin
i
n
a ilişkin
b
i
si, 14, 185
-
o
n of The
o
//doi.org/1
0
e
deji, A. F.
I
nternation
a
6
/ijld.v2i1.1
4
l
arının Yaz
m
r
sity Journ
a
.baskı). An
k
(2015). A
rnal of Fa
m
i
terary env
i
c
tion Servi
c
l
?accno=E
D
iversite öğ
r
1
-465.
n
g Student
s
a
Polytech
n
libphilprac
/
n
d Creatin
g
ı
nıf Öğret
m
ü
zeylerinin
Eskişehir,
3
Eğitimi v
e
f
university
n
ternational
R
r
d Reading
4
67-9817.0
0
d
es of und
e
7
-1671.
i
n okuma i
l
ir tutum öl
ç
-
195.
o
retical Dis
c
0
.1111/146
7
(2012). R
e
a
l Journa
l
4
70
m
a Kaygı
D
a
l of the Fa
k
ara: Nobe
l
study on t
h
m
ily, Child
a
i
ronments a
c
e No. ED
3
D
385822.
r
encilerinin
s
and its E
n
ic. Libra
r
/
1130
g
Literate S
o
m
enliği ile
D
Karşılaştı
r
3
25-328.
e
Spor böl
ü
s
tudent: Sa
m
R
esearch in
E
ISSN
2
2019, Vol.
http://ire.mac
r
Strategies.
0
122
e
rgraduate
s
l
gi alanları.
çeğinin ge
ç
course wit
h
7
-9817.001
3
e
ading Int
e
l
of Lear
n
D
urumlarını
n
a
culty of E
d
l
yayıncılık
.
h
e factors
a
a
nd Educat
i
a
nd attitude
s
3
85 822.
R
okuma alı
ş
E
ffect on A
r
y Philoso
p
ocial.
I
nter
Diğer Öğr
e
r
ılması. VI
.
ü
mü öğren
m
pling of
Y
E
ducation
2
327-5499
7, No. 2
r
othin
k
.org
Journal
s
tudents.
TÜBAV
ç
erlik ve
h
Close.
3
4
rest and
n
ing &
n
Çeşitli
d
ucation,
.
a
ffecting
i
on, 5(3),
s
toward
R
etrieved
ş
kanlığı:
c
ademic
p
hy and
n
ational
e
tmenlik
Ulusal
c
ilerinin
Y
üzüncü
Yıl Un
i
Temiz
k
tutuml
a
from h
t
Turcan
,
okuma
Bildiril
e
Yayl a lı
,
Atatür
k
Yazıcı,
üzerine
Yılmaz
Bakanl
ı
Cop
y
r
i
Copyri
g
This a
r
Creativ
i
versity. Tü
r
k
an, M., &
S
a
rının karşı
l
t
tp://dergip
a
,
A. İ., Yıl
d
alışkanlık
d
e
ri I. Eskiş
e
,
M. (200
6
k
Üniversit
e
E. (2001).
bir alan a
r
, B. (199
3
ı
ğı.
ig
ht Discla
i
g
ht reserve
d
r
ticle is a
n
e Common
s
r
kiye Sosya
l
S
allabaş,
M
l
aştırılması.
a
rk.org.tr/es
d
ırım, S. S.,
d
üzeyinin t
e
e
hir: Anado
l
6
). Ünivers
e
si Yayınlar
ı
Üniversit
e
r
aştırması:
G
3
). Okuma
i
mer
d
by the aut
h
n
ope
n
-acc
e
s
Attributio
n
l
Araştırma
M
. E. (2009
)
Elektroni
k
osder/issue
/
& Kelleci
,
e
sbiti üzeri
n
l
u Üniversi
t
ite gençli
ğ
ı
.
e
Gençliği,
G
azi Ünive
r
alışkanlı
ğ
h
ors.
e
ss article
d
n
license (
h
57
lar Dergisi
,
)
. Öğretme
n
k
S
osyal Bi
l
/6141/824
0
,
F. (1999).
n
e bir araş
t
t
esi.
ğ
inin sosyo
-
2001: Ün
i
rsitesi örn
e
ğ
ında halk
d
istributed
h
ttp://creati
v
I
n
,
603-622.
n
adayların
ı
l
imler Der
g
0
7
Üniversite
t
ırma. 4.Ul
u
-
ekonomik
p
i
versite ge
n
eğ
i. Ankara:
kütüphane
under the
v
ecommon
s
n
ternational
R
ı
n okuma
v
g
isi, 8(27)
1
öğrenciler
i
u
sal Eğitim
p
rofili ara
ş
n
çliğinin s
o
Gazi Üniv
e
l
erinin rol
ü
terms and
s
.org/licens
e
R
esearch in
E
ISSN
2
2019, Vol.
http://ire.mac
r
v
e yazmaya
155-176.
R
i
arasında
d
Bilimleri
K
ştırması.
E
o
syo-kültür
e
e
rsitesi Yaz
y
ü
. Ankara:
d
condition
s
e
s/by/3.0/).
E
ducation
2
327-5499
7, No. 2
r
othin
k
.org
yönelik
R
etrieved
d
ers dışı
K
ongresi
E
rzurum:
e
l profili
y
ınları.
Kültür
s
of the