Many countries, including Finland, have adopted an ageing-in-place policy goal as a response to population ageing. This policy goal involves prioritising ageing in one’s own home and community and postponing possible relocation to a long-term care facility. For many older adults, the existing home really is the best and preferred place to live, but for some, it can turn into a place of isolation due to mobility problems. As the prevalence of mobility problems and disability increases with older age, one of the key issues that needs to be addressed when pursuing the ageing-in-place policy goal is how to support older adults who have problems with moving around and engaging in activities outside the home.
This doctoral thesis provides an everyday life view of ‘ageing in place’ with mobility difficulties, and thus, it adheres to the tradition of studying social policy from the perspective of people’s daily lives. This thesis focuses especially on local everyday mobilities, including journeys and activities that take place outside the home. It provides a synthesis of three articles and poses the following research question: how do older adults organise and interpret their everyday (im)mobilities when they face mobility difficulties? While article I provides a broader everyday life view of how older adults organise their out-of-home mobility when they face mobility difficulties, the other two articles focus on the cases of a dial-a-ride bus and grocery shopping. More specifically, article II explores how older adults make their everyday dial-a-ride bus journeys to the local mall. Article III studies how the participants organised and reorganised their grocery shopping before and during the COVID-19 outbreak, and how the meanings of everyday (im)mobilities connected to grocery shopping were formed in this abruptly changing situation.
To study older adults’ everyday (im)mobilities, this thesis draws from two sets of qualitative interviews conducted with older adults living in a Finnish suburb. The first dataset includes seven focus group interviews that explored older residents’ (n=28) experiences living in the suburb in 2017. The second dataset involves qualitative repeat interviews conducted with dial-a-ride bus users. In autumn 2019, I conducted go-along and sit-down interviews with 12 bus users to explore how they used the dial-a-ride bus service and what kind of role it played in their daily lives. In spring 2020, I conducted telephone interviews with the same participants1 to explore how their daily lives and mobilities had changed during the COVID-19 pandemic.
This thesis builds on emerging research at the intersection of mobilities research and geographical gerontology. While mobilities research makes it possible to expand ideas of mobility in later life, geographical gerontology provides fruitful theoretical perspectives for interpreting the relationships between ageing individuals and their places of ageing as an active and co-constitutive process. By building on these perspectives, the findings shed light on how the participants’ relationships with the suburb had changed over time and how these changes had created mobility difficulties necessitating many kinds of negotiations and adjustments. The resulting everyday (im)mobilities were both place-bound and place-creating: on the one hand, places shape older adults’ possibilities to be (im)mobile and their interpretations of changing mobility situations. On the other hand, older adults shape places both physically and socially through practices connected to their everyday (im)mobilities. Hence, this thesis contributes to understanding that older adults’ everyday (im)mobilities are central to how ageing individuals and their places of ageing co- constitute each other.
This thesis provides critical insight into the ageing-in-place policy goal and the development of age-friendly communities in terms of how to support older adults who face mobility problems while living in their own homes. The findings highlight the importance of out-of-home mobility for wellbeing and show that even seemingly mundane trips to run daily errands can constitute a meaningful experience and a social event. Thus, daily routine trips can be about much more than just the practical need to “get things done”: they can provide valued opportunities to socialise, enjoy the outdoors, maintain a meaningful daily rhythm, and exercise. In a context where home-delivery and digital services are increasingly seen as cost-effective solutions to support ageing in place, it is important to note that they are not equivalent to physical trips to visit services.
In addition, the findings provide concrete knowledge regarding how to develop age-friendly transport services. Here, three points are key: (i) It is necessary to consider the role of transport services more holistically in later life contexts. Rather than viewing transport services merely as a means of accessing necessary services, it is important to consider their wider potential to foster social participation and wellbeing. (ii) Creating supportive transport services requires scrutinising the entire travel chain in a very detailed manner. (iii) To develop transport solutions, it is crucial to engage older adults with diverse social backgrounds, abilities, and lifestyles to ensure that these solutions cater to the needs of a heterogeneous group of older people living in their own homes and communities.