ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

Premise: Closely related species occurring in sympatry may experience the negative consequences of interspecific pollen transfer if reproductive isolation (RI) barriers are not in place. We evaluated the importance of pre- and post-pollination RI barriers in three sympatric species of Achimenes (Gesneriaceae), including ecogeographic, phenological, floral isolation, self-pollination, and hybrid viability (fruit and seed set). Methods: We recorded geographic distribution throughout species ranges and assessed flowering phenology and pollinator visitation at one site in central Mexico. In the greenhouse, we measured floral traits involved in RI and quantified fruit and seed set for from self, intraspecific, and interspecific crosses. Results: Ecogeographic barriers were important in RI, but under sympatry, phenological and floral barriers contributed more to total RI. Phenological RI varied between species and years, while floral RI was 100% effective at preventing interspecific visitation. Species showed differences in floral morphology, color, and scents associated with specialized pollination systems (A. antirrhina-hummingbirds, A. flava-bees, A. patens-butterflies); heterospecific visitation events were restricted to rare secondary pollinators. Hybrid crosses consistently yielded progeny in lower numbers than intraspecific crosses. Conclusions: This study indicated that neither autogamy nor early post-pollination barriers prevent interspecific pollen flow between Achimenes species. However, floral isolation, acting through a combination of attraction and reward traits, consistently ensures specificity of the pollination system. These results suggest that selection on floral traits to reduce the costs of hybrid progeny production may have played a role in evolution or maintenance of specialized pollination systems in Achimenes.
Content may be subject to copyright.
American Journal of Botany 106(7): 1021–1031, 2019; http://www.wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/AJB © 2019 Botanical Society of America 1021
e co‐occurrence of closely related plant species in the same com-
munity poses a challenge for species that share similar habitats or
resources. At sympatric sites, congeneric species may not only com-
pete for abiotic resources and pollinators, but they are also vulnera-
ble to reproductive interference (i.e., interspecic reproduction that
reduces the tness of at least one of the coexisting species; Kyogoku,
2015). e phenotypic traits that prevent reproductive interference
may evolve in allopatry or sympatry, but in coexisting popula-
tions of congeneric species, they may act to prevent interspecic
gene ow and gamete wastage and the concomitant costs of hybrid
progeny production (Hopkins and Rausher, 2012). When interspe-
cic pollination represents a cost to reproduction, mechanisms of
reproductive isolation (RI) allow congeneric species to coexist with
reduced reproductive interference (Coyne and Orr, 2004).
Reproductive isolation barriers generally evolve during specia-
tion or upon secondary contact between recently diverged species. In
plants, these are divided into pre‐ and post‐pollination mechanisms
according to their timing of action within the reproductive cycle of
the plant (Baack etal., 2015). Pre‐pollination mechanisms preclude
interspecic pollen ow through changes in habitat use, phenology,
oral traits, and breeding systems, and they may evolve in allopatry
or under selection against unviable or unt hybrid progeny (Levin,
2006; Sobel et al., 2010). Post‐pollination mechanisms of repro-
ductive isolation generally result from the accumulation of genetic
Reproductive isolation among three sympatric Achimenes
species: pre‐ and post‐pollination components
Erandi Ramírez‐Aguirre1,2, Silvana Martén‐Rodríguez1,5 , Gabriela Quesada‐Avila3, Mauricio Quesada1,4, Yesenia Martínez‐Díaz1, Ken Oyama1,
and Francisco J. Espinosa‐García4
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Manuscript received 4 December 2018; revision accepted 6 May 2019.
1 Laboratorio Nacional de Análisis y Síntesis Ecológica
(LANASE),Escuela Nacional de Estudios Superiores (ENES),Unidad
Morelia,Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Morelia,
Michoacán C.P. 58190, México
2 Posgrado en Ciencias Biológicas,Universidad Nacional
Autónoma de México. Unidad de Posgrado,Coordinación del
Posgrado en Ciencias Biológicas. Edicio D,1º Piso. Circuito
de Posgrados,Ciudad Universitaria Del., Coyoacán C. P. 04510,
MéxicoD.F
3 Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica, Heredia, Costa Rica. Avenida1,
Calle 9. Apartado Postal, 86‐3000
4 Instituto de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas,Universidad Nacional
Autónoma de México, Antigua Carretera a Pátzcuaro 8701, Morelia,
Michoacán C.P. 58190, México
5 Author for correspondence (e‐mail: smartenr@gmail.com)
Citation: Ramírez‐Aguirre, E., S. Martén‐Rodríguez,
G. Quesada‐Avila, M. Quesada, Y. Martínez‐Díaz, K. Oyama, and
F. J. Espinosa‐García. 2019. Reproductive isolation among three
sympatric Achimenes species: pre‐ and post‐pollination components.
American Journal of Botany 106(7): 1021–1031.
doi:10.1002/ajb2.1324
PREMISE: Closely related species occurring in sympatry may experience the negative
consequences of interspecic pollen transfer if reproductive isolation (RI) barriers are not
in place. We evaluated the importance of pre‐ and post‐pollination RI barriers in three
sympatric species of Achimenes (Gesneriaceae), including ecogeographic, phenological,
oral isolation, self‐pollination, and hybrid viability (fruit and seed set).
METHODS: We recorded geographic distribution throughout species ranges and assessed
owering phenology and pollinator visitation at one site in central Mexico. In the
greenhouse, we measured oral traits involved in RI and quantied fruit and seed set for
from self, intraspecic, and interspecic crosses.
RESULTS: Ecogeographic barriers were important in RI, but under sympatry, phenological
and oral barriers contributed more to total RI. Phenological RI varied between species
and years, while oral RI was 100% eective at preventing interspecic visitation. Species
showed dierences in oral morphology, color, and scents associated with specialized
pollination systems (A. antirrhina–hummingbirds, A. ava–bees, A. patens–butteries);
heterospecic visitation events were restricted to rare secondary pollinators. Hybrid
crosses consistently yielded progeny in lower numbers than intraspecic crosses.
CONCLUSIONS: This study indicated that neither autogamy nor early post‐pollination
barriers prevent interspecic pollen ow between Achimenes species. However, oral
isolation, acting through a combination of attraction and reward traits, consistently
ensures specicity of the pollination system. These results suggest that selection on oral
traits to reduce the costs of hybrid progeny production may have played a role in evolution
or maintenance of specialized pollination systems in Achimenes.
KEY WORDS oral isolation; Gesneriaceae; hybridization; pollination; reproductive
interference; sympatry; temporal isolation.
1022 American Journal of Botany
dierences during the process of speciation, and they act upon hy-
brid progeny production, viability, or performance (Orr and Turelli,
2001; Coyne and Orr, 2004). ese later barriers have reproductive
costs because gametes are wasted and energy is invested in unt
hybrid progeny; thus, pre‐pollination RI mechanisms are thought
to evolve rst and be stronger than post‐pollination barriers (Lowry
etal., 2008; Baack etal., 2015). However, more studies that jointly
evaluate both types of barriers are necessary to determine the prev-
alence and strength of the dierent forms of reproductive isolation
in lineages of closely related species (Baack etal., 2015).
Habitat isolation is a reproductive barrier caused by local adap-
tation and limited gene ow among allopatric populations, and it
may be one of the rst reproductive barriers to evolve inthe pro-
cesses of speciation (Sobel etal., 2010). In the last decade, ecogeo-
graphic isolation has been tested using dierent approaches (e.g.,
Ramsey et al., 2003; Kay, 2006), but only recently, new methods
based on ecological niche modeling have tested whether dierences
in geographic distributions might also reect changes in adaptation
to particular abiotic environments (Sobel, 2014). When species are
not geographically isolated, natural selection should favor the evo-
lution of alternative RI mechanisms.
In some plant groups, owering phenology plays an important
role at preventing interspecic pollen transfer because divergent or
sequential owering times among sympatric congeners allow the
temporal separation of pollinator use (e.g., Levin and Anderson,
1970). However, owering phenology oen varies between individ-
uals, populations, and years (Kudo, 2006). Furthermore, within a
plant lineage, phenology could be under ecological, developmental,
or historical constraints that might restrict variation in the timing
of reproductive events (Kochmer and Handel, 1986). In these cases,
oral traits related to pollinator attraction may contribute more to
reproductive isolation.
Floral isolation may occur through the mechanical coupling
between owers and pollinators or through oral traits that inu-
ence pollinator attraction and behavior (Grant, 1994). Specically,
the morphological t between owers and pollinators should max-
imize the precision of contact between oral sexual organs and an-
imal body parts, reducing interspecic pollen transfer (e.g., Pauw,
2006). Floral attractants and rewards also inuence pollinator pref-
erences and oral visitation, driving ethological isolation through
specic mechanisms of pollen transfer or pollinator constancy (e.g.,
Schemske and Bradshaw, 1999). e individual contributions of
traits involved in oral isolation vary among plant species (Lowry
etal., 2008); therefore, it is important to dissect the contribution of
dierent traits to RI.
Changes in plant breeding system have also been associated with
the prevention of interspecic pollen transfer in a number of plant
groups (e.g., Bromeliaceae, Matallana etal., 2010; Centaurium, Brys
etal., 2016). Early deposition of self‐pollen on stigmas may interfere
with deposition of outcross and heterospecic pollen (Brys etal.,
2016). A high potential for self‐pollination in addition to high levels
of natural seed production would indicate that autogamy might also
act as a barrier to interspecic pollen transfer in coexisting assem-
blages of closely related species. Although this topic has received re-
cent attention (Goodwillie and Ness, 2013; Briscoe‐Runquist etal.,
2014), information on autonomous self‐pollination as a mechanism
of RI is still sparse relative to our knowledgeof other forms of RI.
e family Gesneriaceae provides an interesting system to study
the dierent traits that contribute to reproductive isolation because
oral traits vary greatly and many species are habitat specialists
that coexist in sympatry (e.g., epiphytic and rupicolous species).
Furthermore, many Gesneriaceae species can produce hybrid prog-
eny through horticultural practices and in natural conditions (e.g.,
Qiu etal., 2011; de Villiers etal., 2013; Smith etal., 2017). Wiehler
(1983) proposed that pollinator specialization was one of the main
reproductive barriers responsible for maintaining the identity of
sympatric congeneric species of Gesneriaceae; however, this idea
has not been tested yet.
e aim of this study was to evaluate the importance of dier-
ent traits involved in the prevention of reproductive interference
among three sympatric Achimenes species from Mexico. Most
members of the genus Achimenes occur on wet riparian clis in
seasonal environments, creating a patchy mosaic of co‐existing
congeners. While hybrids are commonly generated for the orna-
mental plant market, hybrids in nature are rare (Ramírez‐Roa,
1987; E. Ramírez‐Aguirre etal., unpublished data). Achimenes
is a genus of recent evolutionary origin (Roalson and Roberts,
2016); therefore, it is possible that genetic barriers between spe-
cies are not fully developed. We evaluated the following repro-
ductive barriers: (1) ecogeographic isolation, (2) phenological
isolation, (3) oral isolation and its components (morphology,
nectar production and chemical composition, scent production,
and pollinator visitation), (4) isolation by self‐pollination, and
(5) fruit set and seed production as measures of hybrid viabil-
ity. Barriers 1–5 are considered pre‐mating, whereas barrier 5 is
post‐mating and represents the cost of hybridization at the level
of progeny production.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study site
e study was conducted in 2013–2016 during the months of July‐
November at La Tzarazacua Community Park, Parque Nacional
Barranca del Cupatitzio, Uruapan, Michoacan, Mexico (19°2511
19°2624N, 102°0740–102°0420 W, 1400–1500 m a.s.l.). Total
annual rainfall ranges between 1500–2000 mm, and mean annual
temperature is 18–20°C (CONANP, 2006). At the study site, the
vegetation includes a combination of pine–oak and cloud forest
patches that go from early to mid‐late successional stages, inter-
mixed with patches of cattle pasture. Achimenes species grow on the
outcrops of basaltic rock that characterize the basin and canyons of
the Cupatitzio River (CONANP, 2006).
Study species and greenhouse collections
According to the phylogenetic analysis by Roberts and Roalson
(2018), Achimenes is a genus of Mesoamerican origin that com-
prises approximately 26 species. Achimenes antirrhina, A. flava,
and A. patens belong to a larger clade comprising 10 species, and
although these species are not supported as sister to one another,
they last shared a common ancestor approximately 4 million years
ago (Ma) (Roalson and Roberts, 2016); therefore, they are species of
recent divergence. All species are geophytes that inhabit rocky habi-
tats on wet riparian slopes. Geophytes are perennial plants that pro-
duce new shoots every spring from underground organs. In the case
of Achimenes, these shoots reproduce during the growing season
and then die, leaving underground rhizomes dormant through the
winter. Only two individuals of putative hybrid origin (intermediate
July 2019, Volume 106 Ramírez‐Aguirre etal.—Avoidance of interspecific reproduction in Achimenes species 1023
corolla shape and color) were found at the study site between A.
flava and A. patens.
Achimenes antirrhina is a short herb, 30–50 cm long with red‐
orange, tubular owers that have an inner yellow throat (Fig.1A).
Achimenes flava is an herb 20–40 cm long with narrow, bell‐shaped,
yellow corollas (Fig.1B). Achimenes patens is a small herb 10–30cm
long that has violet, narrow, tubular owers with an elongated
spur (Fig.1C). All three species are protandrous; anthers dehisce
on the rst day of anthesis, and stigmas are fully receptive on the
fourth day. ese species have bilobed or stomatomorphic stigmas
(Ramírez‐Roa, 1987).
Living specimens of the three study species were grown ingreen-
houses located at Escuela Nacional de Estudios Superiores, UNAM,
Morelia. All specimens were collected as rhizomes and grown in
pots with a 1:1:1 mix of sphagnum, rock, and organic matter. To
follow natural cycles, watering was started in April and ended in
November, when aerial shoots dry out. Rhizomes were kept dry in
their pots until the following spring.
Pre‐pollination RI: ecogeographic barriers
To assess the role of geographic and habitat isolation in overall RI
between the three Achimenes species, we analyzed ecogeographic
isolation as proposed by Sobel (2014). Using seven bioclimatic lay-
ers (four layers that described temperature, and three layers that
described precipitation) and a topographic wetness layer with a
resolution of 1 km2, we modeled species distributions in MaxEnt
(Phillips and Dúdik, 2008). Using the resulting model layers, we
calculated ecogeographic isolation (Eco i) (RI2 equation of Sobel,
2014; see Appendix S1 for full equations and Appendix S2 for full
description of species distribution models). In summary, the equa-
tion for each species pair was: Eco i = 1 – [shared areas / (shared
areas + unshared areas for focal species)].
Pre‐pollination RI: owering phenology
e owering phenology of A. antirrhina, A. flava, and A. patens
was studied during 2014 and 2015 at La Tzararacua Community
Park. In 2014, we marked 60 plants of A. antirrhina, 51 of A. flava,
and 48 of A. patens. In 2015, we marked 50 plants of each species.
We counted the number of ower buds, open owers, and mature
fruits on each plant every 2 weeks from July to November each year.
Since not all plants survived, nal sample sizes might dier from
initial ones. For this reason, the number of owering individuals
was divided by the number of live individuals on each sampling
date.
Dierences in owering phenology between species were tested
using circular statistics and the circular package (watson.williams.
test function; Agostinelli and Lund, 2017) in R version 3.3.1 (R Core
Team, 2018). Circular statistics are appropriate for time data that
have an underlying cyclical distribution (Zar, 2014). e Watson–
Williams test compares mean angles of two or more samples by
rst transforming the proportions of owering individuals to ra-
dians; this test assumes a Von Mises distribution. e strength of
phenological isolation was evaluated using the 4S2 equation from
Sobel and Chen (2014; Appendix S1). Total reproductive isolation
was calculated using the average of the 2 years when strength values
diered by less than 15%. In three cases, yearly values diered by
more than 30%; thus, we present the individual values for each year
separately.
Pre‐pollination RI: oral traits
Floral morphology and color—We evaluated dierences in o-
ral morphology between A. flava, A. patens, and A. antirrhina by
measuring the following traits on 30 individuals of each species: (1)
corolla length, (2) total ower length including corolla and spur,
(3) corolla mouth height, (4) corolla mouth
width, (5) petal are, (6) anther height, (7)
stigma height, and (8) corolla constriction.
Herkogamy was calculated as the dierence
between anther and stigma height. Since color
dierences were large, corolla color was as-
sessed qualitatively. To determine the degree
of morphological overlap between the study
species, rst we conducted a principal com-
ponent analysis (PCA) in R with the stats
package (R Core Team, 2018). A multivariate
analysis of variance (MANOVA) was used to
compare oral phenotypes with traits 1–5 and
8 as dependent variables and species as the
main factor. Traits 6 and 7 were not included
because Achimenes species are protandrous
and the length of stamens and style vary with
time.
Nectar production and sugar concentra-
tion—In the greenhouse, we tagged six ower
buds on 13 plants of each Achimenes species.
We extracted nectar with 1‐μL micropipettes
through a small hole perforated at the base
of the corolla. e length of the nectar col-
umn was measured with an analog caliper
(DialMax, Willi Hahn Co., Monticello, MN,
FIGURE 1. Reproductive phenology of three sympatric species of Achimenes (Gesneriaceae)
monitored at La Tzararacua, Michoacán, Mexico during 2014 and 2015.
1024 American Journal of Botany
USA). Sugar concentration was measured with a hand ATC refrac-
tometer with temperature calibration and a range of 0–32% °Brix
(equivalent to the number of grams of solute per grams of solution).
We also analyzed the composition and quantity of nectar sugars us-
ing gas chromatography. Nectar was collected in lter paper and
eluted in water for posterior gas chromatographic and mass spec-
trometric analyses as described in Appendix S3. Nectar was mea-
sured from 4‐d‐old owers, when stigmas were clearly open and
turgid.
We used generalized linear models (GLMs) in the stats package
of R (R Core Team, 2018) to test for dierences between species
(predictor variable) in mean nectar volume per ower (response
variable; gamma distribution and inverse link function). We also
tested for dierences in sugar concentration between species, with
dierent error distributions depending on the nature of data (to-
tal concentration: gamma with inverse link; sucrose and glucose:
Gaussian with identity link; fructose: inverse Gaussian with 1/mu2
link; inositol: Poisson with log link; °Brix concentration: quasibino-
mial with log link). Analyses were performed with the stats package
in R (R Core Team, 2018).
Floral scents—Floral volatiles were quantied in the laboratory
infour individuals per species, which had been collected in the eld
and kept in a live collection in the greenhouses of ENES‐Morelia,
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Volatiles were ex-
tracted from owers that were enclosed in glass jars by vacuuming
air for 7 h (from 08:00 to 15:00 hours) and eluted in hexane. Aer
elution, volatiles were analyzed with gas chromatography. Detailed
methods are described in Appendix S3.
Pre‐pollination RI: Pollinator visitation
Floral visitors at focal plants or plant patches of each species were
directly observed and recorded with video cameras (SONY, Japan,
and Panasonic, Japan) for 1‐h periods throughout the day (08:00–
16:00 hours) in sunny to cloudy‐misty weather,during the ower-
ing seasons of 2013–2015. Total observation times and sample sizes
are provided with pollinator visitation results. We recorded time of
visitation, identity and behavior of the visitor, and number of ow-
ers probed. Visitors that contacted the reproductive organs of the
owers were considered legitimate pollinators. We calculated polli-
nator visitation rates by pollinator functional group (i.e., humming-
bird, large bee, small bee, buttery) as the mean number of visits
per ower per hour. Since visitation rates were low and collection of
all oral visitors was not possible, we identied most pollinators to
the lowest possible taxonomic category from video recordings and
photographs. We searched the literature for information on length
of mouthparts (i.e., proboscis or beak) of the dierent pollinator
groups to assess their association with corolla length. Reproductive
isolation was calculated using RI4A equation of Sobel and Chen
(2014; Appendix S1).
Pre‐pollination RI: autonomous self‐pollination
We conducted a greenhouse experiment in 2015 to evaluate the
role of self‐pollination as a potential RI mechanism. We marked
three ower buds per plant on 24 individuals of each species and
assigned them to one of the following treatments: (1) autonomous
pollination (unmanipulated bagged owers), (2) hand cross‐polli-
nation (emasculated owers; pollen from two donors of the same
species, i.e., intraspecic crosses), and (3) hand self‐pollination
(pollen from owers of the same plant). We previously assessed
time of stigma receptivity by recording peroxidase activity each day
of anthesis (Kearns and Inouye, 1993), which corresponded to full
extension of stigma lobes in all species. Mixtures of pollen from
four fresh stamens were placed directly onto stigmas, ensuring
stigma surfaces were saturated with pollen. To compare the fruit
set of autonomous self‐pollination with the fruit set achieved un-
der natural conditions, in the eld we quantied the fruit set from
unmanipulated owers (one per plant in 30 plants per species). For
all treatments, we followed fruit development until maturity and
collected drymature capsulesprior to dehiscence.
We used generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) in the lme4
package in R program (Bates etal., 2015; R Core Team, 2018) to
determine the eect of treatment on fruit set (binomial, logit link
function). Individual was included as a random factor. Contrasts
between treatments were performed with glht function and single‐
step method in package multcomp (Hothorn etal., 2008).
Post‐pollination RI: hybrid viability
In the greenhouse, we conducted intraspecic and interspecic
crosses in 2016 and 2017 to evaluate post‐pollination barriers to
hybrid fruit and seed production and potential costs of hybrid-
ization. We tagged 33 individual plants of A. antirrhina, 29 of
A. flava, and 52 of A. patens; however, nal sample sizes varied
from loss of ower buds or individuals during the study. ree
ower buds per individual were assigned to a dierent hand‐
pollination treatment, where each plant served as a pollen donor
and a pollen recipient for each of two congeners. Pollen was
saturated onto stigmas using anthers of the paternal species.
Approximately 2 months aer pollination, we counted and col-
lected dry mature capsules. Capsules were immediately placed in
petri dishes until they released the seeds. We took photographs
of all seeds produced by each fruit with a Stemi 350 stereoscope
and an Axiocam 105‐color (Carl Zeiss, Germany) and counted
viable and nonviable seeds. Preliminary work indicated that
aborted seeds have contorted shapes and smaller sizes; therefore,
we assessed seed shape and size to estimate the total number of
viable seeds produced per species (hereaer referred to as seed
production). For analyses, we used fruit set (fruits/owers) and
seed production as proxies of hybrid viability.
Aer inspecting residuals under a linear model, we used
GLMMs in the lme4 package (Bates etal., 2015; R Core Team,
2018) to test for the eect of treatment (intraspecic and both in-
terspecic crosses) on fruit set (binomial distribution, logit link
function) and seed production (Poisson distribution, log link
function). Individual plant was included as a random factor. Ad
hoc comparisons of the intraspecic pollination treatment vs.
each interspecic cross were computed with a two‐tailed test, us-
ing multcomp with single‐step method and multiple comparisons
package in R (Hothorn etal., 2008; R Core Team, 2018). Data for
2016 and 2017 were pooled because sample sizes in 2016 were
small (less than 13) and fruit set values were similar in both years.
For calculations of reproductive isolation at the level of fruit set
and seed production, we used the RI4A equation from Sobel and
Chen (2014), which considers the probability of gene ow between
species pairs (Appendix S1). RI values range from 1 (complete iso-
lation) to −1 (complete disassortative mating; RI = 0 indicates no
isolation; Sobel and Chen, 2014).
July 2019, Volume 106 Ramírez‐Aguirre etal.—Avoidance of interspecific reproduction in Achimenes species 1025
Total reproductive isolation
To understand the contributions of each reproductive barrier (eco-
geographic isolation, phenological isolation, oral isolation, and
hybrid fruit set and seed production) to total reproductive isola-
tion, we used the RI4E equation and calculations proposed by Sobel
and Chen (2014). Detailed methods are presented in Appendix
S1. We show the individual strengths of each barrier and the ab-
solute contributions of each barrier to total isolation excluding
ecogeographic isolation (to obtain RI estimates under sympatric
conditions).
RESULTS
Pre‐pollination RI: ecogeographic barriers
e three study species were found in both sympatric and allopatric
populations. Ecogeographic isolation values between species pairs
were over 0.6 in all cases (Table1). e more ecogeographically iso-
lated species pair was A. patens and A. antirrhina (0.74) and the
least isolated A. antirrhina and A. flava (0.64).
Pre‐pollination RI: owering phenology
e owering times of the three study species overlapped during
August and September, but initial owering dates and peaks dif-
fered (Fig.1). ere were no signicant dierences in mean ow-
ering times between species in 2014 (Watson–Williams test F2, 18 =
0.03, P = 0.970), nor in 2015 (F2, 21 = 0.57, P = 0.574). Mean ower-
ing times corresponded to the rst 2 weeks of August in 2014 and
mid August in 2015. RI due to owering phenology varied between
species pairs and was higher in 2014 than in 2015 (RI range, 2014:
0.43–0.94, 2015: 0.09–0.70; Table1).
Pre‐pollination RI: oral traits
Floral morphology—Floral phenotypes diered considerably be-
tween species and showed no overlap in morphological space
(MANOVA, F12, 160 = 170.5, P = 2.2 × 10−16; Fig. 2; Appendix S4).
e traits that contributed most to variation were corolla length,
total ower length, and corolla mouth length for PC axis 1 (56.4%
of total variance) and corolla mouth width and petal are to PC
TABLE 1. Strength of reproduction isolation for individual barriers and total isolation values between three Achimenes species from Central Mexico. Absolute
contributions of each barrier to total isolation include all barriers (AC) and barriers acting in sympatry (AC‐Sym). Relative contributions to total isolation(not shown)
equaled ACs, except for theA. patens × A. avacross.
Maternal × Paternal A. antirrhina × A. ava A. antirrhina × A. patens
Barrier Strength AC AC‐Sym Strength AC AC‐Sym
Ecogeographic 0.638 0.64 0.743 0.74
Phenologicala 0.830 0.30 0.83 0.460, 0.149 0.12, 0.04 0.46, 0.15
Floral 1 0.06 0.17 1 0.14, 0.22 0.54, 0.85
Fruit set 0.660 0 0 0.560 0 0
Total 1 1 1 1
A. ava × A. antirrhina A. ava × A. patens
Ecogeographic 0.638 0.64 0.716 0.72
Phenologicala 0.923, 0.493 0.33, 0.18 0.92, 0.49 0.432 0.12 0.43
Floral 1 0.03, 0.18 0.08, 0.51 1 0.16 0.57
Fruit set 0.700 0 0 −0.006 0 0
Seed production 0 0 0 0.35 0 0
Total 1 1 1 1
A. patens × A. antirrhina A. patens × A. ava
Ecogeographic 0.743 0.74 /0.74 0.715 0.72
Phenologicala 0.429, 0.093 0.11, 0.02 0.43, 0.09 0.494 0.14 0.49
Floral 1 0.15, 0.24 0.57, 0.91 0.800 0.11 0.40
Fruit set 0.210 0 0 0.089 0.01 0.02
Seed production 0.500 0 0 0.292 0.01 0.04
Total 1 1 0.99 0.95
aMean values for 2014 and 2015 phenological reproductive isolation were used for yearly strength values that differed by less than 15%. Individual values for each year are given and
separated by a comma when differences exceeded 30.
FIGURE 2. Principal component analysis of oral traits for three sym-
patric species of Achimenes from La Tzararacua, Michoacán, Mexico.
Achimenes antirrhina (A), A. ava (B), A. patens (C).
A
BC
1026 American Journal of Botany
axis 2 (28.2% of total variance). Corolla lengths coincided with
the mouthparts of the main pollinators of each Achimenes species
(Table2). Corolla color also diered between species (Fig.2).
Nectar production and sugar composition—Nectar volume
diered among the three Achimenes species (χ2 = 46.3, df = 2,
P= 8.9 × 10‐11; Table3); the highest volume was for ornithophi-
lous A. antirrhina (6.6 ± 47.62 μL), and the lowest was for A. flava
(0.8 ± 5.59 μL). Sucrose was the most abundant nectar sugar in all
three species, ranging between 107 and 135 μg/μL (Table 3) and
did not dier in concentration among Achimenes species (χ2 = 1.4,
df=2, P = 0.503). Hexoses (fructose and glucose) and inositol were
three orders of magnitude lower than sucrose; fructose and glucose
concentration diered among species (χ2 = 7.1, df = 2, P = 0.028;
χ2=6.0, df = 2, P = 0.049, respectively), while inositol concentration
did not (χ2=0.17, df = 2, P = 0.917; Table3). Total sugar concentra-
tion ranged between 108 and 159 μg/μL and did not dier among
species (χ2 = 1.3, df = 2, P = 0.517; Table3), neither did sugar con-
centration expressed as °Brix (χ2 = 2.6, df = 2, P = 0.276).
Floral scents—Organic volatiles in owers included the terpenoids
pinene, limonene, cineole, the benzenoid naphthalene, and the
fatty‐acid derived alkene tetradecane, but the presence and con-
centration of these compounds varied among species (Table4). e
oral scent prole of A. antirrhina showed two of the ve volatiles,
while the prole of A. flava and A. patens showed four of the ve
volatile compounds. e last two species diered in one volatile
compound; limonene was exclusive to A. patens, and cineole was
exclusive to A. flava (Table4).
Pre‐pollination RI: pollinator visitation
e main pollinators of the study species were hummingbirds for
A. antirrhina, bees for A. flava, and butteries for A. patens (Table5).
Amazilia beryllina was the only hummingbird species that visited
A. antirrhina, and it was not observed at any other plant species at
the study site. is hummingbird generally probed various ow-
ers within a patch, but territorial behavior was not observed. Bee
visitors to owers of A. flava included medium‐sized bees (tribes
Centridini and Eucerini), small halictid bees and one crabronid
wasp species; a buttery from the genus Pieris visited owers once
in 2013. All lepidopterans observed at A. patens were in the families
Hesperiidae and Pieridae. rips and the Crabronidae wasp were
also observed visiting A. patens. rips acted as nectar robbers be-
cause they did not contact the reproductive organs of the owers,
while Crabronid wasps may be occasional pollinators. Reproductive
isolation through pollinator visitation was complete for most spe-
cies pairs except for A. patens–A. flava (Table1).
Pre‐pollination RI: autonomous self‐pollination
All three species are self‐compatible since they produce fruit and seed
aer hand‐self pollination (Fig.3). However, the values of autono-
mous fruit set ranged between 0 and 4%, while hand‐cross pollina-
tion consistently resulted in fruit set higher than 50% (Fig.3); thus,
autonomous self‐pollination does not contribute to RI. Fruit set from
hand cross‐ and self‐pollination were higher than fruit set from nat-
ural pollination (A. antirrhina: χ2 = 5.9, df = 2, P = 0.049; A. flava:
χ2=60.0, df = 3, P < 0.0001; A. patens: χ2 = 57.1, df = 3, P < 0.0001).
TABLE 2. Mean (±SEM) corolla length and corolla mouth width of three sympatric Achimenes species from Central Mexico, and bill or proboscis length (range)of their
primary pollinators recorded from the literature.
Species N
Corolla length
(mm)
Corolla width
(mm) Main pollinator
Bill/ proboscis length
(mm) Source
A. antirrhina 30 27.3 ± 0.70 6.13 ± 0.14 Amazilia beryllina 18-21 Howell, 2003
A. flava 30 10.1 ± 0.15 5.72 ± 0.17 Centris aff. atripes 11-14a Roubik et al., 1995
A. patens 30 14.5 ± 0.25 3.20 ± 0.13 Urbanus sp. 16-17 Bauder et al., 2015
aProboscis lengths of other Centris species collected in Mexico.
TABLE 3. Mean (±SEM) oral nectar volume and sugar concentration for three species of Achimenes from Central Mexico. Nectar samples were obtained from
greenhouse plants previously collected at La Tzararacua, Michoacán.
Species NNectar vol. (μL) Fructose (μg/μL) Glucose (μg/μL) Sucrose (μg/μL) Inositol (μg/μL) S/H (μg/μL) Total (μg/μL) °Brix (%)
A. antirrhina 11 6.6 ± 1.04a0.5 ± 0.64a 0.02 ± 0.014b 136 ± 28.7a0.2 ± 0.11a805 ± 328.5 136 ± 31.3a33 ± 3.8a
A. flava 10 0.8 ± 0.11b0.2 ± 0.32b 0.07 ± 0.015a 107 ± 32.7a0.2 ± 0.15a621 ± 216 108 ± 27.0a40 ± 3.2a
A. patens 13 3.2 ± 0.4c0.2 ± 0.30b 0.03 ± 0.014b 158 ± 28.7a0.2 ± 0.13a835 ± 189.7 159 ± 29.46a33 ± 3.7a
Notes: Nectar volume (vol.), raw values for fructose and sugar concentration are given for easier comparison. S/H, proportion of sucrose (S) to common hexoses (H = fructose + glucose);
°Brix, sugar concentration (expresses mass/mass relation). Different letters within a column indicate a difference between species.
TABLE 4. Mean relative percentage (±SEM) of oral scent compounds of three Achimenes species collected at La Tzararacua site and grown in a greenhouse.
Compound KRI A. antirrhina A. ava A. patens
α-Pinene 939 58.0 ± 1.78 52.4 ± 17.30 38.5 ± 20.91
Limonene 1029 13.6 ± 7.88
1,8-Cineole 1031 5.0 ± 5.03
cis-Decahydronaphthalene 1099 41.9 ± 1.78 20.2 ± 9.31 28.8 ± 18.99
Tetradecane 1400 22.3 ± 13.71 17.0 ± 9.82
Note: KRI, Kovats retention index.
July 2019, Volume 106 Ramírez‐Aguirre etal.—Avoidance of interspecific reproduction in Achimenes species 1027
Post‐pollination RI: hybrid viability
Interspecic crosses produced fruits in eight of nine parental com-
binations; however, fruit set was asymmetric between crosses ac-
cording to the identity of the donor and recipient species (Figs.4,5).
Fruit set ranged between 53 and 75% for intraspecic crosses and
between 11 and 76% for interspecic crosses (Fig.4). When A. an-
tirrhina was the pollen recipient, hybrid fruit set was lower than in-
traspecic fruit set in both interspecic crosses (χ2 = 10.5, df = 2, P =
0.005). When A. flava was the pollen recipient, hybrid fruit set was
signicantly lower than intraspecic fruit set only when crossed
with A. antirrhina (χ2 = 21.8, df = 2, P < 0.0001). When A. patens
was the pollen recipient, hybrid fruit set values were lower, but they
did not signicantly dier from intraspecic fruit set (χ2 = 5.2,
df = 2, P = 0.075). Reproductive isolation estimates for interspecic
crosses ranged from −0.006 for the cross A. flava × A. patens to 0.70
for the A. ava × A. antirrhina cross (Table1).
Seed production varied with the identity of the pollen recipient
and donor species. Seed production ranged between 304 and 946
for intraspecic crosses and between 146 and 311 for hybrid crosses,
andthe cross A. flava × A. antirrhina did not yield any viable seed
(Fig. 5). For both A. flava and A patens as pollen recipients, hybrid
seed production values were signicantly lower than intraspecic
seed production (χ2 = 367.8, df = 1, P < 0.0001; χ2 = 3075.3, df = 2,
P< 0.0001, respectively). RI values ranged from 0.29 (A. patens ×
A. flava) to 0.5 (A. patens × A.antirrhina). Crosses with A. antirrhina
as a maternal plant were not assessed due to high fruit mortality.
DISCUSSION
Pre‐ and post‐mating mechanisms of
reproductive isolation
is study evaluated dierent plant traits that
might be involved in reproductive isolation
among three congeneric sympatric Gesneriaceae
species. Achimenes flava, A. antirrhina, and
A. patens are habitat specialists that occur on hu-
mid rocky slopes of river canyons in seasonal en-
vironments in the mountains of central Mexico;
thus, we predicted they would oen coexist in
such microhabitats. However, the results showed
that ecogeographic isolation is an important
pre‐pollination barrier when estimated from
relatively large geographic scales (1‐km2 reso-
lution layers), indicating that sympatric assem-
blages are not as common as expected and that
sympatric sites should be hotspots of selection
for other pre‐pollination mechanisms of RI.
Flowering phenology largely overlapped
between species at a site of sympatry; however,
TABLE 5. Mean pollinator visitation rates (±SEM) of three Achimenes species at La Tzararacua, Michoacán, Mexico during 2013–2015, calculated as mean number of
visits ower −1 h−1. N is the total number of observation hours.
Species Pollinator taxon
Mean number of visits ower−1 h−1
2013 (N = 12) 2014 (N = 10) 2015 (N = 5, 6, 8)a
A. antirrhina Trochilidae 0.10 ± 0.011 0.19 ± 0.012 0.6 ± 0.4
Amazillia beryllina
A. flava Hymenoptera 0.14 ± 0.032 0.23 ± 0.091 0.16 ± 0.17
Centris aff. atripes (Apidae)
Eucerini sp.
Halictidae (1 sp.)
Crabronidae (1 sp.)
Pieris sp.
A. patens Lepidoptera 0.34 ± 0.140 0.12 ± 0.07 0.5 ± 0.26
Urbanus dorantes, U. proteus
(Hesperiidae)
Pieridae (aff. Pieris sp.)
Hymenoptera 0.25 ± 0.25
Crabronidae (1 sp.)
aSample sizes, respectively, for A. antirrhina, A. flava, A. patens.
FIGURE 3. Mean fruit set (±SEM) from four pollination treatments used to determine the capac-
ity for autonomous self‐pollination in three sympatric species of Achimenes from Central Mexico.
Hand pollinations were done in the greenhouse and natural pollination was quantied at La
Tzararacua, Michoacán, during 2015. Letters indicate signicant dierences between treatments
within a species.
1028 American Journal of Botany
owering peaks diered signicantly, particularly in 2014. In most
cases, owering phenology was an important contributor to RI, but
it varied between years and species pairs. e overlapping owering
seasons of the study species may be associated with their pseudo‐
annual life history, with aboveground stems that die and regrow ev-
ery year from underground rhizomes at the beginning of the rainy
season. is life cycle restricts the time available for growth and
reproduction, as has been described for other
geophytic plant species (Dafni etal., 1981).
Hence, if closely related sympatric species are
constrained to ower during the same period
of the year, selection may favor oral traits
that promote specialization in pollination
systems (Rathcke and Lacey, 1985).
Floral isolation is, according to our results,
the most important reproductive barrier
among the study species. Only twice during
the study, the same pollinator was observed
visiting owers of two Achimenes species,
which suggests that particular oral traits at-
tract certain kinds of oral visitors and deter
others (see discussion below). Floral isolation
through morphology (mechanical isolation)
is one of the most important RI mechanism
among sympatric species in various plant
genera (e.g., Asclepias, Kephart and eiss,
2003; Costus, Kay, 2006; Spiranthes sinensis
complex, Tao et al., 2018), but ethological
isolation through signals and rewards that in-
uence pollinator behavior are also important
(Schemske and Bradshaw, 1999; Klahre etal.,
2011; Byers etal., 2014).
Autogamy may act as a reproductive
barrier in some species (Levin, 1971; Brys
etal., 2016), but it is unlikely to be relevant
in Achimenes, given the low fruit set re-
sulting from autonomous self‐pollination.
Furthermore, post‐zygotic barriers were
weak in most species pairs, indicating that
reproductive isolation is incomplete at the
level of hybrid viability, a nding that has
been reported for other Gesneriaceae spe-
cies (Johnson etal., 2015; Zhang etal., 2017).
Fruit and seed production from interspecic
crosses varied according to the identity of the
pollen recipient species, and they were oen
asymmetrical (Fig. 3). ese results may re-
ect the inability of pollen tubes from smaller
owers (i.e., A. flava, A. patens) to develop
past their autotrophic phase down to the ova-
ries of the long‐styled A. antirrhina, but this
idea needs to be tested. Other mechanisms
that explain asymmetries in hybrid viability
in other species are genetic and intracellular
incompatibilities, pollen–pistil interactions,
triploid endosperm interactions and/or ma-
ternal eects (Turelli and Moyle, 2007). Our
results of hybrid viability, estimated from fruit
and seed production are congruent with tests
of hybridization, where several Gesneriaceae
species have a high potential to produce hybrid progeny; nonethe-
less, pollen viability may be reduced in some Achimenes hybrids, in-
dicating barriers may be acting at the level of hybrid fertility (Cooke
and Lee, 1966; Wiehler, 1983).
Extrinsic mechanisms that act on individual hybrids, such as low
competitiveness in the parental environment might also account for
the low occurrence of hybrid phenotypes in the wild (Widmer etal.,
FIGURE 4. Mean fruit set (±SEM) obtained from intra‐ and interspecic crosses between three
Achimenes species from Central Mexico. Letters indicate species and shapes indicate maternal
species for each cross: A /diamond= A. anthirrhina, F /triangle = A. ava, P /circle = A. patens.
Letters over symbols indicate signicant dierences between treatments within each maternal
species.
FIGURE 5. Mean seed production per fruit (±SEM) obtained from intra‐ and interspecic crosses
between three Achimenes species from Central Mexico. Letters indicate species and shapes indi-
cate maternal species for each cross: A /diamond= A. anthirrhina, F /triangle= A. ava, P /circle=
A. patens.Letters over symbols indicate signicant dierences between treatments within each
maternal species.
July 2019, Volume 106 Ramírez‐Aguirre etal.—Avoidance of interspecific reproduction in Achimenes species 1029
2009). We registered two individuals with oral phenotypes that
were intermediate between A. flava and A. patens in 2013, but we
did not nd them the following years. Interestingly, pollen viability
in hybrids from A. flava and A. patens is less than 30% (Wiehler,
1983), suggesting that even if hybrid fruits are produced, hybrid in-
dividuals are possibly poor pollen donors. Overall, ndings from
this and other studies suggest that there is a costinvolved in the
production of hybrid progeny.
Floral features that contribute to reproductive isolation—Dier-
ent oral morphologies in closely related species may promote in-
traspecic pollination by placing pollen dierentially on the bodies
of particular pollinators or by attracting specic functional groups
of pollinators (e.g., Pauw, 2006; Martén‐Rodríguez et al., 2009).
Two of the three study species, A. antirrhina and A. patens, have
oral morphologies that promote eective pollen transfer by a sin-
gle functional group of pollinators and restrict access to unwanted
visitors (Fig.2). Narrow, long corollas and spurs in A. patens only
allow access to nectar to insects with relatively long proboscides,
such as the observed hesperid butteries (see Table2). A similar
association has been described for various plant groups pollinated
by lepidopterans or long‐tongued ies (e.g., Whittall and Hodges,
2007; Pauw etal., 2009). Likewise, in the case of Achimenes antir-
rhina, corollas are tubular and only a few millimeters longer than
the mouthparts of their hummingbird pollinators (Amazilia beryl-
lina bill length: 19–21 mm; Howell, 2003). is type of mechani-
cal isolation has been described for various plant taxa, such as the
genera Aquilegia, Penstemon, and Costus (e.g., Fulton and Hodges,
1999; Castellanos etal., 2004; Kay, 2006), although the owers of
hummingbird‐pollinated plants are oen wide enough to be visited
by bees and other small insects. In the case of A. antirrhina, the
absence of bees might be associated with reduced attraction due
to ower color; however, an assessment of ower color spectra and
color vision of local bees would be necessary to test this idea.
e manipulation of pollinator behavior based on pollinator
senses, feeding preferences and energetic demands may contribute
to preventing heterospecic visitation (i.e., ethological isolation,
Grant, 1994). For example, dierences in pollinator attraction medi-
ated by the quantity or quality of oral rewards may play an import-
ant role at preventing interspecic pollen transfer (Mitchell, 1993;
Schemske and Bradshaw, 1999). In this study, the nectar volume
produced per ower diered between the three Achimenes species
consistent with previous studies (Baker and Baker, 1983; Cruden
et al., 1983), higher volumes were produced by hummingbird‐
pollinated A. antirrhina and the lowest volumes by bee‐pollinated
A. flava. Nectar sugar composition has also been shown to dier
according to the preferences of particular pollinators (Baker and
Baker, 1983). However, in the present study, nectar composition did
not contribute to oral isolation because sucrose was the dominant
sugar in the nectar of all three Achimenes species and the content
of other sugars varied little among species. ese results suggest
that nectar sugar composition is phylogenetically conserved in
Achimenes, similar to the case of hummingbird‐ and bee‐pollinated
species of the Brazilian clade Sinningiae (Gesneriaceae; Perret etal.,
2001).
In the case of oral scents, three volatiles were shared between
the insect‐pollinated species, and two of these were present in
hummingbird‐pollinated A. antirrhina. e remaining volatiles in-
cluded one compound that was exclusive to bee‐pollinated A. flava
(1,8‐cineole) and one exclusive to buttery‐pollinated A. patens
(limonene). e nding of only two oral volatiles in A. antirrhina
agrees with ndings for other ornithophilous species and suggests
that nearly scentless owers evolve in lineages pollinated by hum-
mingbirds (Knudsen etal., 2004), although sense of smell has been
little studied in these vertebrates (e.g., Goldsmith and Goldsmith,
1982). In contrast, visual cues and oral scents are common in bee‐
pollinated species (Dobson, 2006). Interestingly, of the four scents
in A. flava, 1,8‐cineole and α‐pinene are commonly found in ow-
ers pollinated by male euglossine bees, and tetradecane is common
in owers pollinated by nectar‐seeking bees (Gerlach and Schill,
1991; Dobson, 2006; Martel et al. 2019). In contrast, terpenoids
such as 1,8‐cineole and limonene are apparently not well perceived
by butteries (Andersson and Dobson, 2003); thus, the function
of limonene in owers of A. patens needs to be further explored.
Finally, the unexpected presence of naphthalene in all species may
be an herbivore deterrent, as suggested for Magnolia (Azuma etal.,
1996). Future studies should address the association between vol-
atiles and pollination systems to determine their potential role in
reproductive isolation in the Gesneriaceae.
CONCLUSIONS
Our results highlight the importance of pollination system spe-
cialization at preventing interspecic pollination and avoiding the
costs of hybrid progeny production, allowing the co‐occurrence of
closely related species with reduced reproductive interference. We
determined that mechanical (oral morphology) and ethological
traits (nectar volume and oral volatiles) contribute to promote
intraspecic visitation by particular pollinators. In contrast, phe-
nology does not allow full temporal separation of reproductive sea-
sons and post‐zygotic barriers are weak, generating conditions that
might favor pollinator‐mediated selection on oral traits to reduce
reproductive interference. ese results suggest a potential role of
reinforcement (i.e., selection that acts on particular traits to reduce
the costs associated with the production of hybrids of low viability
or performance; Hopkins, 2013) in the oral diversication of the
genus Achimenes. Future research investigating the role of phyloge-
netic constraints on phenological and nectar traits and the role of
reinforcement in the diversication of oral traits in tropical geo-
phytes is warranted.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank Andrea Padilla, Germán Avila‐Sakar for help with
eldwork; P. Emiliano Cortés, Violeta Patiño, and Gumersindo
Sánchez‐Montoya for technical assistance; and two anonymous
reviewers for insightful comments to earlier versions of this man-
uscript. We dedicate this article to the memory of our friend and
colleague Constantino Orduña, who initiated the ex situ collection
of Achimenes used in this study. Posgrado en Ciencias Biológicas,
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México provided funding and
support for the development of the doctoral dissertation project of
Erandi Ramírez‐Aguirre. is project was funded by grants from
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (Dirección General
de Personal Académico PAPIIT IA208416, IA207618, IV200418;
Programa de Becas Posdoctorales en la UNAM), Programa
Iberoamericana de Ciencia y Tecnología para el Desarrollo RED
CYTED‐SEPODI (417RT0527), and CONACyT‐Mexico (Projects
1030 American Journal of Botany
Laboratorio Nacional de Análisis y Síntesis Ecológica 271449,
280505, 293701, 299033 to M.Q. and S.M.R.; Proyecto Repositorio
Institucional 271432 and C.B. 155016 to S.M.R., and CVU/scholar-
ship 413896/261462 to E.R.A.).
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
E.R.A. and S.M.R. designed the study, collected and analyzed data,
and wrote the manuscript. Y.M.D., F.J.E.G. and G.Q.A. analyzed
nectar and oral scent data; G.Q.A. and Y.M.D. conducted inter-
specic pollinations; and M.Q. and K.O. contributed to eldwork
and manuscript writing.
DATA ACCESSIBILITY
Calculations of reproductive isolation were based on supporting
information from Sobel and Chen (2014) at https ://onlin elibr ary.
wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/evo.12362 . Species presence data and
geographic information were accessed from www.gbif.org; http://
www.world clim.org/version1; http://www.conab io.gob.mx/infor m
acio n/gis/; and https ://web.archi ve.org/web/20170 51922 1949/
http://world grids.org/doku.php/wiki:layer s#dem-deriv ed_para
m eters .
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
Additional Supporting Information may be found online in the
supporting information tab for this article.
APPENDIX S1. Reproductive isolation equations from Sobel and
Chen (2014) used in the analysis of reproductive barriers among
three Achimenes species from Central Mexico.
APPENDIX S2. Methods used to estimate ecogeographic isolation
between three Achimenes species from Central Mexico.
APPENDIX S3. Methods for nectar and scent analyses used for
three Achimenes species from Central Mexico.
APPENDIX S4. Floral trait measurements of three Achimenes spe-
cies from La Tzararacua, Michoacán, México.
LITERATURE CITED
Agostinelli, C., and U. Lund. 2017. R package circular: circular statistics (version
0.4‐93). Available at https ://r-forge.r-proje ct.org/proje cts/circu lar/.
Andersson, S., and H. E. M. Dobson. 2003. Antennal responses to oral scents
in the buttery Heliconius melpomene. Journal of Chemical Ecology 29:
2319–2330.
Azuma, H., M. Toyota, Y. Asakawa, and S. Kawano. 1996. Naphthalene‐ a con-
stituent of Magnolia owers. Phytochemistry 42: 999–1004.
Baack, E., M. C. Melo, L. H. Rieseberg, and D. Ortíz‐Barrientos. 2015. e ori-
gins of reproductive isolation in plants. New Phytologist 207: 968–984.
Baker, H. G., and I. Baker. 1983. Floral nectar constituents in relation to polli-
nator type. In C. E. Jones and R. J. Little [eds]. Handbook of pollination bi-
ology, 117–141. Scientic and Academic Editions, Van Nostrand Reinhold,
NY, NY, USA.
Bates, D., M. Maechler, B. Bolker, and S. Walker. 2015. Fitting linear mixed‐
eects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67: 1–48.
Bauder, J. A. S., A. D. Warren, and H. W. Krenn. 2015. e ecological role of ex-
tremely long‐proboscid Neotropical butteries (Lepidoptera:Hesperiidae) in
plant‐pollinator networks. Arthropod-Plant Interactions 9: 415–424.
Briscoe‐Runquist, R. D., E. Chu, J. L. Iverson, J. C. Kopp, and D. A. Moeller.
2014. Rapid evolution of reproductive isolation between incipient outcross-
ing and selng Clarkia species. Evolution 68: 2885–2900.
Brys, R., J. van Cauwenberghe, and H. Jacquemyn. 2016. e importance of au-
tonomous selng in preventing hybridization in three closely related plant
species. Journal of Ecology 104: 601–610.
Byers, K. J. R. P., H. D. Bradshaw, and J. A. Riell. 2014. ree oral volatiles
contribute to dierential pollinator attraction in monkeyowers (Mimulus).
Journal of Experimental Biology 217: 614–623.
Castellanos, M. C., P. Wilson, and J. D. omson. 2004. ‘Anti‐bee’ and ‘pro‐bird
changes during the evolution of hummingbird pollination in Penstemon
owers. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 17: 876–885.
CONANP [Comisíon Nacional de Áreas Naturales Protegidas]. 2006. Programa
de Conservación y Manejo del Parque Nacional Barranca del Cupatitzio.
CONANP, Ciudad de México, México. Available at https ://simec.conanp.
gob.mx/pdf_libro_pm/3_libro_pm.pdf.
Cooke, J. F., and R. E. Lee. 1966. Hybridization within and between Achimenes P.
Br. and Smithiantha Kuntze (Gesneriaceae). Baileya 14: 92–101.
Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr. 2004. Speciation. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, USA.
Cruden, R. W., S. M. Herman, and S. Paterson. 1983. Patterns of nectar produc-
tion and plant‐pollinator coevolution. In B. Bentley and T. S. Ellias [eds.],
e biology of nectaries, 80–125. Columbia University Press, NY, NY, USA.
Dafni, A., D. Cohen, and I. Noi‐Mier. 1981. Life‐cycle variation in geophytes.
Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 68: 652–660.
Dobson, H. E. M. 2006. Relationship between oral fragrance composition and
type of pollinator. In N. Dudareva and E. Picherskyeds [eds.], Biology of
oral scent, 147–198. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
de, Villiers, M.J., M. D. Pirie, M. Hughes, M. Möller, T. J. Edwards, and D. U.
Bellstedt. 2013. An approach to identify putative hybrids in the “coalescent
stochasticity zone, as exemplied in the African plant genus Streptocarpus
(Gesneriaceae). New Phytologist 198: 284–300.
Fulton, M., and S. A. Hodges. 1999. Floral isolation between Aquilegia formosa
and Aquilegia pubescens. Proceedings of the Royal Society, B, Biological
Sciences 266: 2247–2252.
Gerlach, G., and R. Schill. 1991. Composition of orchid scents attracting eu-
glossine bees. Botanica Acta 104: 379–384.
Goldsmith, K. M., and H. Goldsmith. 1982. Sense of smell in the black‐chinned
hummingbird. Condor 84: 237–238.
Goodwillie, C., and J. N. Ness. 2013. Interactions of hybridization and mating
systems: a case study in Leptosiphon (Polemoniaceae). American Journal of
Botany 100: 1002–1013.
Grant, V. 1994. Modes and origins of mechanical and ethological isolation in an-
giosperms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 91: 3–10.
Hopkins, R. 2013. Reinforcement in plants. New Phytologist 197: 1095–1103.
Hopkins, R., and M. D. Rausher. 2012. Pollinator‐mediated selection on ower
color allele drives reinforcement. Science 335: 1090–1092.
Hothorn, T., F. Bretz, and P. Westfall. 2008. Simultaneous inference in general
parametric models. Biometrical Journal 50: 346–363.
Howell, S. N. G. 2003. Hummingbirds of North America: the photographic
guide: 70. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Johnson, M. A., D. K. Price, J. P. Price, and E. A. Stacy. 2015. Post‐zygotic barri-
ers isolate sympatric species of Cyrtandra (Gesneriaceae) in Hawaiian mon-
tane forest understories. American Journal of Botany 102: 1870–1882.
Kay, K. M. 2006. Reproductive isolation between two closely related humming-
bird‐pollinated neotropical gingers. Evolution 60: 538–552.
Kearns, C. A., and D. W. Inouye. 1993. Techniques for pollination biologists, 1st
ed. University Press of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA.
Kephart, S., and K. eiss. 2003. Pollinator mediated isolation in sympatric
milkweeds (Asclepias): Do oral morphology and insect behavior inuence
species boundaries? New Phytologist 161: 265–267.
Klahre, U., A. Gurba, K. Hermann, M. Saxenhofer, E. Bossolini, P. M. Guerin,
and C. Kuhlemeier. 2011. Pollinator choice in Petunia depends on two major
genetic loci for oral scent production. Current Biology 21: 730–739.
July 2019, Volume 106 Ramírez‐Aguirre etal.—Avoidance of interspecific reproduction in Achimenes species 1031
Knudsen, J. T., L. Tollsten, I. Groth, G. Bergström, and R. A. Raguso. 2004.
Trends in oral scent chemistry in pollination syndromes: oral scent com-
position in hummingbird‐pollinated taxa. Botanical Journal of the Linnean
Society 146: 191–199.
Kochmer, J. P., and S. N. Handel. 1986. Constraints and competition in the evo-
lution of owering phenology. Ecological Monographs 56: 303–325.
Kudo, G. 2006. Flowering phenologies of animal‐pollinated plants: reproductive
strategies and agents of selection. In L. D. Harder and S. C. H. Barrett [eds.],
Ecology and evolution of owers, 139–156. Oxford University Press, Oxford,
UK.
Kyogoku, D. 2015. Reproductive interference: ecological and evolutionary con-
sequences of interspecic promiscuity. Population Ecology 57: 253–260.
Levin, D. A. 1971. e origin of reproductive isolation mechanisms in owering
plants. Taxon 20: 91–113.
Levin, D. A. 2006. Flowering phenology in relation to adaptive radiation.
Systematic Botany 31: 239–246.
Levin, D. A., and W. W. Anderson. 1970. Competition for pollinators between
simultaneously owering species. American Naturalist 104: 455–467.
Lowry, D. B., J. L. Modliszewski, K. M. Wright, C. A. Wu, and J. H. Willis. 2008.
e strength and genetic basis of reproductive isolating barriers in owering
plants. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B, Biological Sciences
363: 3009–3021.
Martel, C., G. Gerlach, M. Ayasse, and P. Milet-Pinheiro. 2019. Pollination ecol-
ogy of the Neotropical gesneriad Gloxinia perennis: chemical composition
and temporal uctuation of oral perfume. Plant Biology 21: 723–731.
Martén‐Rodríguez, S., A. Almarales‐Castro, and C. B. Fenster. 2009. Evaluation
of pollination syndromes in Antillean Gesneriaceae: evidence for bat, hum-
mingbird and generalized owers. Journal of Ecology 97: 348–359.
Matallana, G., M. A. S. Godinho, F. A. G. Guilherme, M. Belisario, T. S. Coser,
and T. Wendt. 2010. Breeding systems of Bromeliaceae species: evolution
of selng in the context of sympatric occurrence. Plant Systematics and
Evolution 289: 57–65.
Mitchell, R. 1993. Adaptive signicance of Ipomopsis aggregata nectar produc-
tion: observation and experiment in the eld. Evolution 47: 25–35.
Orr, H. A., and M. Turelli. 2001. e evolution of postzygotic isolation: accumu-
lating Dobzhansky‐Muller incompatibilities. Evolution 55: 1085–1094.
Pauw, A. 2006. Floral syndromes accurately predict pollination by a special-
ized oil‐collecting bee (Rediviva peringueyi, Mellitidae) in a guild of South
African orchids (Coryciinae). American Journal of Botany 93: 917–926.
Pauw, A., J. Stoerg, and R. J. Waterman. 2009. Flies and owers in Darwin's
race. Evolution 63: 268–279.
Perret, M., A. Chautems, R. Spichiger, M. Peixoto, and V. Savolainen. 2001.
Nectar sugar composition in relation to pollination syndromes in Sinningieae
(Gesneriaceae). Annals of Botany 87: 267–273.
Phillips, S. J., and M. Dudík. 2008. Modeling of species distributions with
Maxent: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecogeography 31:
161–175.
Qiu, Z.‐J., Z.‐L. Yuan, Z.‐Y. Li, and Y.‐Z. Wang. 2011. Conrmation of a natu-
ral hybrid species in Petrocosmea (Gesneriaceae) based on molecular and
morphological evidence. Journal of Systematics and Evolution 49: 449–463.
Ramírez‐Roa, A. 1987. Revisión de Achimenes (Gesneriaceae). Senior thesis,
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, México.
Ramsey, J., H. D. Bradshaw, and D. W. Schemske. 2003. Components of repro-
ductive isolation between the monkeyowers Mimulus lewisii and M. cardi-
nalis (Phrymaceae). Evolution 57: 1520–1534.
Rathcke, B., and E. P. Lacey. 1985. Phenological patterns of terrestrial plants.
Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 16: 179–214.
R Core Team. 2018. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R
Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
Roalson, E. H., and W. R. Roberts. 2016. Distinct processes drive diversication
in dierent clades of Gesneriaceae. Systematic Biology 65: 662–684.
Roberts, W. R., and E. H. Roalson. 2018. Phylogenomic analyses reveal extensive
gene ow within magic owers (Achimenes). American Journal of Botany
105: 726–740.
Roubik, D. W., D. Yanega, M. S. Aluja, S. L. Buchmann, and D. W. Inouye. 1995.
On optimal nectar foraging by some tropical bees. (Hymenoptera: Apidae).
Apidologie 26: 197–211.
Schemske, D. W., and H. D. Bradshaw. 1999. Pollinator preference and the evolu-
tion of oral traits in monkeyowers (Mimulus). Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences, USA 96: 11910–11915.
Smith, J. F., J. Clark, M. Amaya‐Márquez, and O. H. Marín‐Gómez.
2017. Resolving incongruence: species of hybrid origin in Columnea
(Gesneriaceae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 106: 228–240.
Sobel, J. M. 2014. Ecogeographic isolation and speciation in genus Mimulus.
American Naturalist 184: 565–579.
Sobel, J. M., and G. F. Chen. 2014. Unication of methods for estimating the
strength of reproductive isolation. Evolution 68: 1511–1522.
Sobel, J. M., G. F. Chen, L. R. Watt, and D. W. Schemske. 2010. e biology of
speciation. Evolution 64: 295–315.
Tao, Z.‐B., Z.‐X. Ren, P. Bernhardt, H. Liang, H.‐D. Li, Y.‐H. Zhao, H. Wang, and
D.‐L. Li. 2018. Does reproductive isolation reect segregation of color forms
in Spiranthes sinensis (Pers.) Ames complex (Orchidaceae) in the Chinese
Himalayas? Ecology and Evolution 8: 5455–5469.
Turelli, M., and L. C. Moyle. 2007. Asymmetric post‐mating isolation: Darwin's
corollary to Haldane's rule. Genetics 176: 1059–1088.
Whittall, J. B., and S. A. Hodges. 2007. Pollinator shis drive increasingly long
nectar spurs in columbine owers. Nature 447: 706–710.
Widmer, A., C. Lexer, and S. Cozzolino. 2009. Evolution of reproductive isola-
tion in plants. Heredity 102: 31–38.
Wiehler, H. 1983. A synopsis of the Neotropical Gesneriaceae. Selbyana 6: 1–219.
Zar, J. H. 2014. Biostatistical analysis, 5th ed. Pearson Education, Harlow, UK.
Zhang, X., L. Yang, and M. Kang. 2017. Post‐pollination reproductive iso-
lation of sympatric populations of Primulina eburnea and P. mabaensis
(Gesneriaceae). Biodiversity Science 25: 615–620.
... Therefore, prezygotic reproductive isolation barriers may be favored, especially when species or lineages co-occur in parapatry or sympatry (Ramsey et al., 2003;Baack et al., 2015). As a consequence, temporal isolation through differences in phenology (Michalski and Durka, 2015), and/or pollinator isolation, i.e. distinct pollinator assemblages, may be favored (Okamoto et al., 2015;Ramıŕez-Aguirre et al., 2019). However, pollinator sharing might also represent an advantage through increasing pollinator services and facilitating pollen dispersal for both plant species or lineages (Ghazoul, 2006;Phillips et al., 2020), and through offering more resources to pollinators, also possibly over a longer period of time (Moeller, 2004). ...
... flower color and size, scent and nectar composition, resulting in different visiting pollinator assemblages and in pollinator isolation (e.g. Schemske and Bradshaw, 1999;Waelti et al., 2008;Ramıŕez-Aguirre et al., 2019). Divergence in floral traits between S. nutans ecotypes, such as flower color (white for calcicolous plants and greenish, yellowish to pink for silicicolous plants) and size of the petal scale (1.9 times longer for the calcicolous ecotype; De Bilde, 1973), indeed suggests possible pollinator isolation. ...
... Pollinator isolation can be expected between genetically distinct lineages due to mating costs associated with interlineage pollination events (pollen losses and investment in inviable hybrids), and the incompleteness of other prezygotic barriers (e.g., partial phenological isolation, and habitat isolation but no geographic isolation) (Baack et al., 2015;Moreira-Hernańdez and Muchhala, 2019;Ramıŕez-Aguirre et al., 2019). The two ecotypes of S. nutans might thus benefit from attracting different pollinator assemblages, but we found no pollinator isolation. ...
Article
Full-text available
High reciprocal pollination specialization leading to pollinator isolation can prevent interspecific pollen transfer and competition for pollinators. Sharing pollinators may induce mating costs, but it may also increase pollination services and pollen dispersal and offer more resources to pollinators, which may be important in case of habitat fragmentation leading to pollination disruption. We estimated pollen dispersal and pollinator isolation or sharing between two reproductively isolated genetic lineages of Silene nutans (Caryophyllaceae), which are rare and occur in parapatry in southern Belgium, forming two edaphic ecotypes. As inter-ecotypic crosses may lead to pollen wastage and inviable progeny, pollinator isolation might have evolved between ecotypes. Silene nutans is mainly pollinated by nocturnal moths, including nursery pollinators, which pollinate and lay their eggs in flowers, and whose caterpillars feed on flowers and seeds. Pollinator assemblages of the two ecotypes are largely unknown and inter-ecotypic pollen flows have never been investigated. Fluorescent powdered dyes were used as pollen analogues to quantify intra- and inter-ecotypic pollen transfers and seeds were germinated to detect chlorotic seedlings resulting from inter-ecotypic pollination. Nocturnal pollinators were observed using infrared cameras on the field, and seed-eating caterpillars were collected and reared to identify nursery pollinator species. No pollinator isolation was found: we detected long-distance (up to 5 km) inter-ecotypic dye transfers and chlorotic seedlings, indicating inter-ecotypic fertilization events. The rare moth Hadena albimacula, a nursery pollinator specialized on S. nutans, was found on both ecotypes, as well as adults visiting flowers (cameras recordings) as seed-eating caterpillars. However, S. nutans populations harbor different abundance and diversity of seed predator communities, including other rare nursery pollinators, suggesting a need for distinct conservation strategies. Our findings demonstrate the efficiency of moths, especially of nursery pollinators, to disperse pollen over long distances in natural landscapes, so to ensure gene flow and population sustainability of the host plant. Seed-predator specificities between the two reproductively isolated genetic lineages of S. nutans, and pollinator sharing instead of pollinator isolation when plants occur in parapatry, suggest that conservation of the host plant is also essential for sustaining (rare) pollinator and seed predator communities.
... On the one hand, pre-zygotic barriers that limit interspecific gene flow between congeners could explain why multiple morphotypes can coexist. Such pre-zygotic barriers could include occurrence in specific habitats (Schnitzler et al., 2011;Anacker & Strauss, 2014;Mantel & Sweigart, 2019), divergent flowering phenology (Anderson, Alexandersson & Johnson, 2010;Newman, Anderson & Johnson, 2012;Matsumoto et al., 2019;Ramírez-Aguirre et al., 2019;Osborne et al., 2020), use of different pollinators or divergent use of the same pollinator (Peakall et al., 2010;Pedron et al., 2012;Ramírez-Aguirre et al., 2019) and divergence in mechanical features leading to character displacement (Queiroz et al., 2015;Zheng et al., 2017;Newman & Anderson, 2020). Studies of the reproductive biology of S. longicauda have shown that TELW, TFLP and TFLP are visited by nocturnal moths that differ in the length of their proboscis (Harder & Johnson, 2005;Jersáková & Johnson, 2007;Ellis & Johnson, 2010;Johnson et al., 2011Johnson et al., , 2019Duffy & Johnson, 2014). ...
... On the one hand, pre-zygotic barriers that limit interspecific gene flow between congeners could explain why multiple morphotypes can coexist. Such pre-zygotic barriers could include occurrence in specific habitats (Schnitzler et al., 2011;Anacker & Strauss, 2014;Mantel & Sweigart, 2019), divergent flowering phenology (Anderson, Alexandersson & Johnson, 2010;Newman, Anderson & Johnson, 2012;Matsumoto et al., 2019;Ramírez-Aguirre et al., 2019;Osborne et al., 2020), use of different pollinators or divergent use of the same pollinator (Peakall et al., 2010;Pedron et al., 2012;Ramírez-Aguirre et al., 2019) and divergence in mechanical features leading to character displacement (Queiroz et al., 2015;Zheng et al., 2017;Newman & Anderson, 2020). Studies of the reproductive biology of S. longicauda have shown that TELW, TFLP and TFLP are visited by nocturnal moths that differ in the length of their proboscis (Harder & Johnson, 2005;Jersáková & Johnson, 2007;Ellis & Johnson, 2010;Johnson et al., 2011Johnson et al., , 2019Duffy & Johnson, 2014). ...
Article
Species-level taxonomy is traditionally based on herbarium collections that typically include few, or even single, representatives per site. This can lead to underestimation of diversity when there are sympatric populations of superficially similar plants belonging to different lineages. Satyrium longicauda (Orchidaceae) represents a taxonomic challenge for the delimitation of species boundaries due to the high degree of morphological variation detected within and among populations. Currently, just two varieties are accepted based mainly on length differences of the lateral sepal and nectar spur. However, there is extensive morphological variation within South African populations and evidence for several pollination ecotypes, indicating that this taxon represents an actively diverging species complex. Here, we evaluate intraspecific morphological variation through uni- and multivariate morphometrics and analyse internal transcribed spacer sequences for individuals sampled from 36 sites, including 14 sites where divergent morphotypes occur sympatrically. Morphometric analyses of 1802 individuals revealed the presence of eight morphotypes based on vegetative and floral characters. Up to six morphologically and genetically distinct morphotypes can coexist in sympatry. Morphological and genetic distances among populations were significantly correlated. Phylogenetic analyses of 120 accessions indicated that neither of the two varieties nor S. longicauda as a species is monophyletic, and provided evidence for the monophyly of some of the morphotypes including the newly described S. cernuiflorum. The presence of distinct morphological and genetic sympatric variants, which in several cases scale up to distinct evolutionary lineages, is consistent with the existence of different taxa according to morphological and biological species concepts. Our results therefore confirm that taxonomy based mainly on herbarium collections can grossly under-estimate actual diversity of disparate lineages, although further work is required to finalize taxonomic decisions. These findings have implications for efforts to estimate species diversity in groups that are in the process of diversifying and for conservation practice.
... for C. aconitifolius but positive for C. souzae (RI = 0.24), meaning that a greater proportion of heterospecific pollen reached the base of the styles of C. aconitifolius compared with conspecific pollen. This result (negative RI for pollen-pistil incompatibility) is not uncommon in the literature and is usually attributed to differences in style length or the degree of self-compatibility (e.g., Costa et al., 2007;Ramírez-Aguirre et al., 2019;Scopece et al., 2013). ...
Article
Full-text available
Reproductive isolation is conferred by several barriers that occur at different stages of reproduction. Comprehensive reviews on the topic have identified that barriers occurring prior to zygote formation are often stronger than those that occur afterward. However, the overrepresentation of temperate perennial herbs in the current literature precludes any generalization of this pattern to plants that present other life forms and patterns of distribution. Here, we assessed reproductive isolation barriers and their absolute contribution to reproductive isolation and asymmetry in Cnidoscolus aconitifolius and C. souzae , two closely related tropical shrub species that co‐occur on the Yucatan peninsula. The reproductive barriers assessed were phenological mismatch, pollinator differentiation, pollen–pistil incompatibility (three pre‐zygotic barriers), fruit set failure, and seed unviability (post‐zygotic barriers). Reproductive isolation between the study species was found to be complete in the direction C. aconitifolius to C. souzae , but only partial in the opposite direction. One post‐zygotic barrier was the strongest example. Most barriers, particularly the pre‐zygotic examples, were asymmetrical and predicted the direction of heterospecific pollen flow and hybrid formation from C. souzae to C. aconitifolius . Both parental species, as well as the hybrids, were diploid and had a chromosome number 2n = 36. More studies with tropical woody perennials are required to fully determine whether this group of plants consistently shows stronger post‐zygotic barriers.
... The high prevalence of hybridization in Henckelia is not surprising given the high frequency of this process in the family Gesneriaceae (Arisum, 1964;Morley, 1976;Smith et al., 1996;Puglisi et al., 2011;Qiu et al., 2011;Afkhami-Sarvestani et al., 2012;de Pillon et al., 2013;de Villiers et al., 2013;Smith et al., 2017;Roberts and Roalson, 2018;Kleinkopf et al., 2019;de Araujo et al., 2021). Extensive Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/aob/article/131/6/953/7161305 by National Science & Technology Library user on 21 August 2023 hybridization in Henckelia can probably be explained by a lack of complete reproductive isolation in Gesneriaceae (Zhang et al., 2017;Ramírez-Aguirre et al., 2019;Feng et al., 2020b). Therefore, artificial hybrids can be easily produced using different parental species, even from different genera (Lü et al., 2017). ...
Article
Background and Aims Hybridization has long been recognized as an important process for plant evolution and is often accompanied by polyploidization, another prominent force in generating biodiversity. Despite its pivotal importance in evolution, the actual prevalence and distribution of hybridization across the tree of life remain unclear. Methods We used whole-genome shotgun (WGS) sequencing and cytological data to investigate the evolutionary history of Henckelia, a large genus in the family Gesneriaceae with a high frequency of suspected hybridization and polyploidization events. We generated WGS sequencing data at about 10× coverage for 26 Chinese Henckelia species plus one Sri Lanka species. To untangle the hybridization history, we separately extracted whole plastomes and thousands of single-copy nuclear genes from the sequencing data, and reconstructed phylogenies based on both nuclear and plastid data. We also explored sources of both genealogical and cytonuclear conflicts and identified signals of hybridization and introgression within our phylogenomic dataset using several statistical methods. Additionally, to test the polyploidization history, we evaluated chromosome counts for 45 populations of the studied 27 Henckelia species. Key Results We obtained well-supported phylogenetic relationships using both concatenation and coalescent-based methods. However, the nuclear phylogenies were highly inconsistent with the plastid phylogeny, and we observed intensive discordance among nuclear gene trees. Further analyses suggested that both incomplete lineage sorting (ILS) and gene flow contributed to the observed cytonuclear and genealogical discordance. Our analyses of introgression and phylogenetic networks revealed a complex history of hybridization within the genus Henckelia. In addition, based on chromosome counts for 27 Henckelia species, we found independent polyploidization events occurred within Henckelia after different hybridization events. Conclusions Our findings demonstrated that hybridization and polyploidization are common in Henckelia. Furthermore, our results revealed that H. oblongifolia is not a member of the redefined Henckelia and suggested several other taxonomic treatments in this genus.
... It should be an ecologically important issue how these species have survived and preserved their populations in isolated habitats since the last glacial period, particularly when competitive species exist. Generally, spatial and temporal niche separation is effective for the coexistence of sympatricrelated species (Coyne and Orr 2004;Ramírez-Aguirre et al. 2019). Habitat use separation at the microscale and phenological isolation of resource use timing can mitigate exploitation competition for limited resources (Shigesada, Kawasaki, and Teramoto 1979;Snyder 2008) or pollinator acquisition (Waser 1978). ...
Article
Reproductive interference between sympatric-related species often causes adverse impacts on rare species, which increases the risk of local extinction, particularly in small and isolated populations. To evaluate the congeneric interactions in alpine plants, we compared the ecological and genetic properties and assessed the reproductive interference between tetraploid Rhododendron diversipilosum (widespread species) and diploid Rhododendron subarcticum (rare species in alpine fellfields) in northern Japan. In alpine fellfields, R. diversipilosum is commonly distributed close to shrubby patches, whereas R. subarcticum tends to grow in more exposed places, although they are sometimes mixed. R. subarcticum initiated flowering one week earlier; however, the flowering periods overlapped between species, indicating incomplete phenological isolation. The pollination experiment showed that both species were self-incompatible. Furthermore, heterospecific pollination occurred only for R. subarcticum; however, hybrid seeds seldom germinated. These results indicate that reproductive interference is asymmetric between species, where only the rare R. subarcticum may suffer from heterospecific pollination. Genetic analysis showed that R. subarcticum populations had lower genetic diversity but higher divergence among populations than R. diversipilosum. Although spatiotemporal niche separations may mitigate reproductive interference, the risk of local extinction could be higher in R. subarcticum populations because of isolated distributions with low genetic diversity.
... Both natural selection and neutral evolution lead to genetic differentiation between species (Abbott et al., 2013). Reproductive isolation occurs when genetic differentiation hinders fertilization and hybrid development (Ramírez Aguirre et al., 2019;Sobel et al., 2010). In general, as the genetic distance increases, the RI becomes more comprehensive and stronger. ...
Article
Full-text available
Daylily (Hemerocallis) is a perennial with high ornamental value. It is difficult to obtain innovative daylily germplasm by conventional crossbreeding. To enrich the genetic variation of Hemerocallis, daylily was used as male parent to cross with lycoris (Lycoris). Artificial pollination and embryo rescue were performed to overcome reproductive isolation. Cross‐compatibility and pollen germination were analysed to investigate interfamily reproductive isolation. Leaf morphological analysis and inter‐simple sequence repeat (ISSR) were performed to identify the hybrid at seedling stage. Results showed that most pollen grains failed to adhere to stigmas, and pollen tubes germinated in a disordered direction. Ten days after pollination, 77.19% of ovaries aborted. Ovaries were harvested only in 10 hybridization combinations, the fruit setting rates were 7.69%–42.86%, and the ovule numbers were 0–6.0 per ovary. One embryo developed into plantlets eventually, whose parental combination was L. aurea × H. ‘My Complementary’. The hybrid was identified and exhibited both intermediate and novel characteristics of parents. This research is the first attempt to explore a protocol to obtain interfamily hybrid between daylily and lycoris.
... Floral chemical compounds, and their particular patterns, have proven to be crucial in the attraction of specific pollinator guilds (e.g., Knudsen & Tollsten, 1993, 1995Dobson, 2006;Schäffler et al., 2015) and promote floral isolation among closely related species (e.g., species of the same genus; Schiestl & Schlüter, 2009). Although closely related species pollinated by the same pollinator guild would still have a speciesspecific pattern of chemical compounds (e.g., Stökl et al., 2005;van der Niet et al., 2010;Gong et al., 2015;Milet-Pinheiro et al., 2015), it is expected that these differences in chemical composition would be greater when they are pollinated by different pollinator guilds (e.g., Ramírez-Aguirre et al., 2019). Effectively, we show that all Neotinea species have a specific floral cuticular chemical composition, but the cuticular composition of the predominantly tachinid-pollinated N. ustulata is particularly distinct among all Neotinea species. ...
Article
Full-text available
Among terrestrial orchids, and particularly among the subtribe Orchidinae, flies are underrepresented as pollinators. The European Neotinea ustulata, which developed specialized pollination by tachinid flies, is known to produce high relative concentrations of the floral cuticular alkenes (Z)-11-tricosene and (Z)-11-pentacosene (referred to as (Z)-11-C23/C25enes), which seem to be uncommon among orchid flowers. If the evolution of tachinid pollination is related to that of (Z)-11-C23/C25enes, we can expect that closely related species have a different floral chemical pattern and significantly small or no production of (Z)-11-C23/C25enes, independently of their pollinator guild identity (e.g., bees, flies, moths). We chemically compared the floral cuticular composition among Neotinea species, performed electrophysiological analyses, reconstructed the phylogenetic Orchidinae tree, and identified the evolutionary history of pollinator guild and (Z)-11-C23/C25enes production within the Orchidinae. Neotinea ustulata has evolved a markedly different floral cuticular composition compared to other Neotinea and produces both compounds ((Z)-11-C23/C25enes) in high relative quantities (i.e., above 8% in combination), which are detectable by tachinid antennae. Moreover, most Orchidinae taxa have minimal or no production of these alkenes, independently of the identity of their pollinator guild. Our ancestral reconstruction suggested that (Z)-11-C23/C25enes production was an evolutionary exaptation in Neotinea, whereas tachinid pollination was a unique evolutionary innovation for N. ustulata. Floral cuticular composition and, in particular, the combined production of (Z)-11-C23/C25enes at relatively high concentrations is intimately linked to the evolution of tachinid pollination within the Orchidinae.
Article
Three morning glory species in the genus Argyreia Lour., A. lycioides (Choisy) Traiperm & Rattanakrajang, A. mekongensis Gagnep & Courchet, and A. versicolor (Kerr) Staples & Traiperm, were found co-occurring and co-flowering. Argyreia mekongensis and A. versicolor are rare, while A. lycioides is near threatened and distributed throughout Myanmar and Thailand. We investigated key floral characters (floral morphology and phenology, as well as the micromorphology of the floral nectary disc and staminal trichomes) and screened for important chemical compounds hypothesized to contribute to pollinator attraction. Our findings demonstrate that some aspects of floral morphology ( e.g. , corolla size, limb presence, and floral color) of the three studied congeners exhibit significant differences. Moreover, pollinator composition appears to be influenced by floral shape and size; morning glory species with wider corolla tubes were pollinated by larger bees. The morphology of the floral nectary disc was similar in all species, while variation in staminal trichomes was observed across species. Glandular trichomes were found in all three species, while non-glandular trichomes were found only in A. versicolor . Histochemical results revealed different compounds in the floral nectary and staminal trichomes of each species, which may contribute to both floral attraction and defense. These findings demonstrate some segregation of floral visitors among sympatric co-flowering morning glory species, which appears to be influenced by the macro- and micromorphology of flowers and their chemical compounds. Moreover, understanding the floral morphology and chemical attractants of these sympatric co-flowering Argyreia species may help to maintain their common pollinators in order to conserve these rare and endangered species, especially A. versicolor .
Article
Full-text available
Habitat heterogeneity leads to genome-wide differentiation and morphological and ecological differentiation, which will progress along the speciation continuum, eventually leading to speciation. Phragmites hirsuta and Phragmites australis are sympatric congeners that coexist in saline-alkaline meadow soil (SAS) and sandy soil (SS) habitats of the Songnen Meadow. The results provided genetic evidence for two separate species of reeds. Genetic diversity and spatial genetic structure supported the specialist-generalist variation hypothesis (SGVH) in these two sympatric reed species, suggesting that P. australis is a generalist and P. hirsuta is a habitat specialist. When we compared these different species with respect to phenotypic and genetic variation patterns in different habitats, we found that the phenotypic differentiation of P. australis between the two habitats was higher than that of P. hirsuta. Multiple subtle differences in morphology, genetic background, and habitat use collectively contribute to ecological success for similar congeners. This study provided evidence of the two reed congeners, which should contribute to their success in harsh environments.
Article
Full-text available
While hybridization plays a large role in speciation, some unknown fraction of hybrid individuals never reproduces, instead remaining as genetic dead-ends. We investigated a morphologically distinct and culturally important Chinese walnut, Juglans hopeiensis, suspected to have arisen from hybridization of Persian walnut (J. regia) with Asian butternuts (J. cathayensis, J. mandshurica and hybrids between J. cathayensis and J. mandshurica). Based on 151 whole-genome sequences of the relevant taxa, we discovered that all J. hopeiensis individuals are first-generation hybrids, with the time for the onset of gene flow estimated as 370,000 years, implying both strong postzygotic barriers and the presence of J. regia in China by that time. Six inversion regions enriched for genes associated with pollen germination and pollen tube growth may be involved in the postzygotic barriers that prevent sexual reproduction in the hybrids. Despite its long-recurrent origination and distinct traits, J. hopeiensis does not appear on the way to speciation.
Article
Full-text available
Premise of the Study The Neotropical Gesneriaceae is a lineage known for its colorful and diverse flowers, as well as an extensive history of intra‐ and intergeneric hybridization, particularly among Achimenes (the magic flowers) and other members of subtribe Gloxiniinae. Despite numerous studies seeking to elucidate the evolutionary relationships of these lineages, relatively few have sought to infer specific patterns of gene flow despite evidence of widespread hybridization. Methods To explore the utility of phylogenomic data for reassessing phylogenetic relationships and inferring patterns of gene flow among species of Achimenes, we sequenced 12 transcriptomes. We used a variety of methods to infer the species tree, examine gene tree discordance, and infer patterns of gene flow. Key Results Phylogenomic analyses resolve clade relationships at the crown of the lineage with strong support. In contrast to previous analyses, we recovered strong support for several new relationships despite a significant amount of gene tree discordance. We present evidence for at least two introgression events between two species pairs that share pollinators, and suggest that the species status of Achimenes admirabilis be reexamined. Conclusions Our study demonstrates the utility of transcriptome data for phylogenomic analyses, and inferring patterns of gene flow despite gene tree discordance. Moreover, these data provide another example of prevalent interspecific gene flow among Neotropical plants that share pollinators.
Article
Full-text available
Isolation between species, or taxa sharing a common lineage, depends primarily on the relative strengths of various reproductive barriers. Previous studies on reproductive isolation between orchids emphasized mechanical and ethological barriers in flowers of species showing food and/or sexual mimicry. In this study, we investigated and quantified a series of prepollination and postpollination barriers between pink and white forms of Spiranthes sinensis sl, a nectar‐secreting complex. We generated ML trees based on trnS‐G and matK to explore phylogenetic relationships in this species complex. Spiranthes sinensis sl segregated from some other congeners, but the white form constituted a distinct clade in relation to the pink form. The white form secreted 2‐Phenylethanol as it is a single‐scent compound and was pollinated almost exclusively by native, large‐bodied Apis cerana and Bombus species (Apidae). Apis cerana showed a high floral constancy to this form. The scentless, pink form was pollinated primarily by smaller bees in the genera Ceratina (Apidae), and members of the family Halictidae, with infrequent visits by A. cerana and Bombus species. Fruit set and the production of large embryos following interform pollination treatments were significantly lower compared to intraform pollination results for the white form. Our results suggested that pollinator isolation, based on color and scent cues, may result in greater floral constancy in white populations when both forms are sympatric as two different, guilds of pollinators forage selectively preventing or reducing prospective gene flow. Postpollination barriers appear weaker than prepollination barriers but they also play a role in interform isolation, especially in the white form. Our findings suggest that floral color forms in S. sinensis do not represent an unbalanced polymorphism. Interpretations of the evolutionary status of these forms are discussed.
Article
Full-text available
Reproductive isolation is essential for sympatric populations of closely related species to maintain species integrity and to prevent genetic introgression caused by hybridization. Primulina is the largest genus of Gesneriaceae in China, with a high degree of species diversity and endemism. Most species of the genus are karst habitat specialists (i.e. calciphiles), and many closely related species show a sympatric distribution in karst landscapes. To better understand the mechanism of sympatry in Primulina, post-pollination reproductive isolation, including pollen competition, fruit set, seed mass, seed germination, and pollen viability, was investigated in two closely related species, P. eburnea and P. mabaensis. Results indicated that the total post-pollination isolation strength for P. eburnea and P. mabaensis was 0.09 and 0.13, respectively, which were not strong enough to prevent hybridization completely. The strength of reproductive isolation from pollen competition and seed germination of P. eburnea and P. mabaensis was negative, suggesting facilitation for gene flow between species; while the strength of the fruit set, seed mass, and pollen viability showed a weak role in preventing interspecies hybridization. However, the two species are able to maintain their integrity well, as rare hybrid individuals are found in nature, suggesting that the existence of pre-pollination isolation mechanisms may play a more important role in maintaining species boundaries in these two species.
Article
Full-text available
Using a time-calibrated phylogenetic hypothesis including 768 Gesneriaceae species (out of ~ 3300 species) and more than 29,000 aligned bases from 26 gene regions, we test Gesneriaceae for diversification rate shifts and the possible proximal drivers of these shifts: geographic distributions, growth forms, and pollination syndromes. Bayesian Analysis of Macroevolutionary Mixtures analyses found five significant rate shifts in Beslerieae, core Nematanthus , core Columneinae, core Streptocarpus , and Pacific Cyrtandra . These rate shifts correspond with shifts in diversification rates, as inferred by Binary State Speciation and Extinction Model and Geographic State Speciation and Extinction model, associated with hummingbird pollination, epiphytism, unifoliate growth, and geographic area. Our results suggest that diversification processes are extremely variable across Gesneriaceae clades with different combinations of characters influencing diversification rates in different clades. Diversification patterns between New and Old World lineages show dramatic differences, suggesting that the processes of diversification in Gesneriaceae are very different in these two geographic regions.
Article
Full-text available
In plants that are able to self‐fertilize, autonomous selfing has been hypothesized to function as an effective mechanism that prevents heterospecific mating. However, there have only been few studies that have assessed the relative and absolute contribution of different modes of selfing to total reproductive isolation acting between species. Because selfing can be expected to increase fitness costs when offspring are sired from more outcrossing sister taxa, it can be hypothesized that the contribution of post‐zygotic barriers to total reproductive isolation becomes stronger in selfing than in more outcrossing relatives. To assess the efficiency of different modes of selfing against heterospecific mating, we conducted mixed‐pollination experiments in three C entaurium species showing strong differences in mating system (i.e. delayed selfing in C entaurium erythraea , competing selfing in C . littorale and prior selfing in C . pulchellum ). The contribution of selfing to total reproductive isolation was further examined by quantifying the strength of three pre‐zygotic (flowering phenology, pollinator fidelity and pollen production) and four intrinsic post‐zygotic (seed set and germination, survival and flowering capacity) barriers for each of the six species pair combinations. Although autonomous selfing as a reproductive barrier was unable to completely impede gene flow, its efficiency as a mechanism to prevents heterospecific pollination strongly depended on the mode of selfing, with prior selfing being by far the most efficient mechanism and delayed selfing only offering a limited protection against hybrid fertilization at the end of a flower's lifetime. Apart from the prevention effect of selfing, differences in pollinator fidelity and pollen production also contributed substantially to total reproductive isolation. Post‐zygotic hybrid costs were high and most prevalent for seed production and germination success. Reductions in hybrid vigour were significantly associated with the mating system of the maternal species, with the highest reductions in the most selfing C . pulchellum and the lowest reductions in predominant outcrossing C . erythraea . Synthesis . Our findings indicate that selfing may prevent species from interspecific gene flow and hybridization. The association between the capacity to self‐autonomously and hybrid vigour further suggests that selfing may foster post‐zygotic costs following hybridization.
Chapter
The reproductive organs and mating biology of angiosperms exhibit greater variety than those of any other group of organisms. Flowers and inflorescences are also the most diverse structures produced by angiosperms, and floral traits provide some of the most compelling examples of evolution by natural selection. Given that flowering plants include roughly 250,000 species, their reproductive diversity will not be explained easily by continued accumulation of case studies of individual species. ınstead a more strategic approach is now required, which seeks to identify general principles concerning the role of ecological function in the evolution of reproductive diversity. The Ecology and Evolution of Flowers uses this approach to expose new insights into the functional basis of floral diversity, and presents the very latest theoretical and empirical research on floral evolution. Floral biology is a dynamic and growing area and this book, written by the leading internationally recognized researchers in this field, reviews current progress in understanding the evolution and function of flowers. Chapters contain both new research findings and synthesis. Major sections in turn examine functional aspects of floral traits and sexual systems, the ecological influences on reproductive adaptation, and the role of floral biology in angiosperm diversification. Overall, this integrated treatment illustrates the role of floral function and evolution in the generation of angiosperm biodiversity. This advanced textbook is suitable for graduate level students taking courses in plant ecology, evolution, systematics, biodiversity and conservation. ıt will also be of interest and use to a broader audience of plant scientists seeking an authoritative overview of recent advances in floral biology.
Article
Although common among orchids, pollination by perfume‐gathering male euglossine bees is quite rare in other neotropical families. In Gesneriaceae, for example, it is reported in two genera only, Drymonia and Gloxinia. Flowers of G. perennis are known to emit perfumes, thereby attracting male euglossine bees as pollinators. However, detailed reports on the pollination ecology, as well as on chemistry of floral perfumes of individuals in natural populations, are still missing. In this study, we report on the pollination ecology of G. perennis, focusing on the ecological significance of its floral perfumes. In natural populations in Peru, we documented the floral biology and breeding system of G. perennis, as well as its interaction with flower visitors. We also characterized the chemical composition of floral perfumes, as well as its timing of emission. Gloxinia perennis is self‐compatible and natural pollination success is high. Spontaneous self‐pollination occurs as a “just in case strategy” when pollinators are scarce. Perfume‐collecting males of Eulaema cingulata and El. meriana were identified as pollinators. The perfume bouquet of G. perennis consists of 16 compounds. (E)‐Carvone epoxide (41%) and limonene (23%) are the major constituents. Perfume emission is higher at 09:00 h, matching the activity peak of Eulaema pollinators. Flowers of G. perennis evolved a mixed strategy to ensure pollination (i.e. self‐ and cross‐pollination), but cross‐pollination is favoured. The size and behaviour of Eulaema males enable only to them to cross‐pollinate G. perennis. Furthermore, G. perennis floral perfume traits (i.e. chemistry and timing of emission) have evolved to optimize the attraction of these bees. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Article
Production of floral nectar is generally thought to be an adaptation that increases plant fitness by altering pollinator behavior, and therefore pollination success. To test this hypothesis, I investigated the effects of floral nectar production rate on pollination success of the hermaphroditic plant Ipomopsis aggregata (Polemoniaceae). Success through male function (estimated by the export of fluorescent dyes) was significantly greater for plants with naturally high nectar production rates than for nearby plants with low nectar production rates, whereas success through female function (receipt of fluorescent dye) was unrelated to nectar production rate. Experimental addition of artificial nectar also produced a significant increase in male function success and no increase in several estimates of female function success. Observations confirmed that hummingbirds probed a larger proportion of flowers on plants that received supplemental nectar, as they do in response to natural variation in nectar production. The concordance of results across these observational and experimental studies indicates that nectar production acts primarily to increase pollination success through male function for this species.
Article
Speciation by hybridization has long been recognized among plants and includes both homoploid and allopolyploid speciation. The numbers of presumed hybrid species averages close to 11% and tends to be concentrated in a subset of angiosperm families. Recent advances in molecular methods have verified species of hybrid origin that had been presumed on the basis of morphology and have identified species that were not initially considered hybrids. Identifying species of hybrid origin is often a challenge and typically based on intermediate morphology, or discrepancies between molecular datasets. Discrepancies between data partitions may result from several factors including poor support, incomplete lineage sorting, or hybridization. A phylogenetic analysis of species in Columnea (Gesneriaceae) indicated significant incongruencies between the cpDNA and nrDNA datasets. Tests that examined whether one or both of the datasets had the phylogenetic signal to reject the topology of the alternate dataset (Shimodaira and Hasegawa [SH] and approximately unbiased [AU] tests) indicated significant differences between the topologies. Splitstree analyses also showed that there was support for the placement of the discrepant taxa in both datasets and that the combined data placed the putative hybrid species in an intermediate position between the two datasets. The genealogical sorting index (GSI) implied that coalescence in nrDNA had occurred in all species where more than a single individual had been sampled, but the GSI value was lower for the cpDNA of most of the putative hybrids, implying that these regions have not yet coalesced in these lineages despite being haploid. The JML test that evaluates simulated species pairwise distances against observed distances also implies that observed nrDNA data generate shorter distances than simulated data, implying hybridization. It is most likely that C. gigantifolia, C. rubriacuta, and C. sp. nov. represent a lineage from a hybrid ancestor, but C. moorei may be a more recent hybrid and may still be undergoing hybridization with sympatric species.