Content uploaded by Ratna Hardaningtyas
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Ratna Hardaningtyas on Jun 24, 2022
Content may be subject to copyright.
Journal of Business, Economics and Finance -JBEF (2019), Vol.8(2). p.127-132 Hatneny, Saraswati, Hardaningtyas
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
DOI: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2019.1043 127
DYNAMICS OF KNOWLEDGE IN THE ECONOMIC SYSTEM FRAMEWORK: COGNITIVE APPROACH
DOI: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2019.1043
JBEF- V.8-ISS.2-2019(5)-p.127-132
Aleria Irma Hatneny1, Ety Saraswati2, Ratna Tri Hardaningtyas3
1University of Islam Malang, Faculty of Economics and Business, Malang, Indonesia
aleriairmah@unisma.ac.id, ORCID: 0000-0002-3801-3777
2University of Islam Malang, Faculty of Economics and Business, Malang, Indonesia
etysaraswati@unisma.ac.id
3University of Islam Malang, Faculty of Economics and Business, Malang, Indonesia
ratnatyas@unisma.ac.id
Date Received: April 4, 2019 Date Accepted: June 15, 2019
To cite this document
Hatneny, A. I., Saraswati, E., Hardaningtyas, R. T. (2019). Dynamics of knowledge in the economic system framework: Cognitive approach
Journal of Business, Economics and Finance (JBEF), V.8(2), p.127-132, DOI: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2019.1043
Permemant link to this document: http://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2019.1043
Copyright: Published by PressAcademia and limited licenced re-use rights only.
ABSTRACT
Purpose- This paper aims to explore how the role of knowledge shapes concepts in an economic system framework.
Methodology- Literature study
Findings- By using literature study within cognitive approaches based on management theory, it can be explained how knowledge is processed,
what environmental conditions are needed, and which actors are related. Furthermore, the relationship between concepts is discussed and
presented in the form of conceptual framework of economic system from knowledge perspective.
Conclusion- This paper confirms the importance of the role of knowledge as a key resource in economic system that can be adopted or
developed in regional economic studies.
Keywords: knowledge dynamics, economic system framework, regional economic studies
JEL Codes: D83, P40, P48
1. INTRODUCTION
In the regional economic context, the discussion of knowledge as a resource is less prominent than the discussion of human
resources especially when it is associated with competitiveness and economic growth (Cadil, 2014, p. 85), so that the
accumulation of knowledge and innovation is at a slower rate than in infrastructure and human resources (Zao, 2011, p. 46).
Even if we want to explore the main sources of business and management issues that develop, knowledge becomes a very
important essence. In the development history of evolution chain in management thinking, knowledge has always been the
trigger for all business transformation. Starting from the industrial revolution in the 18th century, innovations have changed the
production by using machines and no longer using human power (Stevenson, 2012). The invention of PC (Personal Computer) in
the 1980s (O’Brien, 2003) to the internet era, can be said to be the result of the development of knowledge. Therefore, it is
reasonable if we place knowledge as an important resource not only in the context of regional economics but also in other
contexts.
The history of Japan's success emerging as an Asian economic giant in the 1980s is quite clear evidence of how knowledge
resources can be managed into competitiveness on a regional scale. Zao (2011, p. 46) in his paper said, "Practice has proven that
the environment and infrastructure are the core of local enterprises' innovation." Similar to Zao, Jeannerat (2016, p. 2) said that
Journal of Business, Economics and Finance -JBEF (2019), Vol.8(2). p.127-132 Hatneny, Saraswati, Hardaningtyas
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
DOI: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2019.1043 128
"... regional production systems may be competitive advantage in the global cumulative generation and exploitation of
knowledge resources."
After being destroyed by a war and an atomic bomb by allies in 1945, Japan intensively developed a concept that we know as
Total Quality Management (TQM), which originated from the thoughts of quality management teachers such as Edward Deming.
Japan managed to combine the concept of quality management with Japanese philosophy which was elaborated from local
culture such as working hard, never giving up and some others. Until the 1980s Japan with its steel production proved the
efficiency and effectiveness of its industry by defeating American-made steel products (Gasperz, 2005).
As in corporate perspective, the nature of knowledge resources in regional contexts is not static but dynamic and always
continues to evolve, adapt and renew itself at all times (Jeannerat, 2016, p. 4). Knowledge resources also have different
characteristics because they do not experience any contraction unlike any other general resources (eg HR and capital) (Krumins,
2015, p. 117). With good regional knowledge management, it aims to create an innovative regional environment to create high
competitiveness.
Most of the existing studies still focus on the corporate context. By looking at increasingly tight business competition it will be
difficult for a company to achieve good competitiveness with its own strength. Synergy with the economic system surrounding is
very important to strengthen its position. Thus, the need for study in the context of regional economic system is expected to
answer these problems. The main concepts that will be discussed in this paper include; business environment, knowledge in the
economic system and key actors in knowledge management.
2. BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT
The concept of a business environment must be well described, both from a vertical and horizontal perspective so that
knowledge ecosystem can run well (Noennig, 2014, p. 1360-1362). Business environment itself also changes regularly or is so
dynamic (Pachura, 2013). This is because (1) from the customer's perspective, market demands are always changing, (2) from its
nature perspective, the knowledge itself is dynamic, which encourages the emergence of new innovations.
Although changes in the business environment are quite complex and can change with a scale that is difficult to predict, it can
still be approached as a system (Noennig, 2014 and Jarvi, 2018). Noennig (2014) and Jarvi (2018) call the knowledge
environment specifically as a system or 'ecosystem', which can be conceptually described in terms of relationships between
entities in the ecosystem. In contrast, Jeannerat (2016) (figure 1) does not specifically describe the knowledge environment as a
system, but only looking at the environment as limited to the concept of geography. Jeannerat focuses more on how knowledge
proceeds through a system of production and consumption. However, Jeannerat can describe well how knowledge experiences
its dynamics through renewals in a production and consumption system.
Figure 1: Conceptualizing an economic of knowledge valuation (Jeannerat, 2016)
Journal of Business, Economics and Finance -JBEF (2019), Vol.8(2). p.127-132 Hatneny, Saraswati, Hardaningtyas
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
DOI: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2019.1043 129
Business environment from regional perspective is also seen as an important aspect because it is a prerequisite for subsystems
to work properly (Noennig, 2014) because environmental stability guarantees the effectiveness and efficiency of regional
management (Zao, 2011). The relationship between the concept of environment and knowledge has often been observed and is
a very important issue because knowledge ecosystem is considered as a driver of the birth of innovation. Disruptions to the
environment because of the political situation and government regulations that are less supportive will disturb knowledge
interactions (Gurvich, 2016).
From an internal-external point of view as a result of its regional scope, it is identical to the concept of the company. The
difference is in a wider scale, where the level of uncertainty is high (Jeannerat, 2016) so that to realize it requires the
organization and collectivity of the actors. It is different from the corporate context where internal-external boundaries are
limited by production and consumption systems (Jeannerat, 2016).
The environment will influence strategy, both internal and externally. In principle, it is the same between company's economic
system and regional economic system. Both can take the same approach using the I / O (Industrial Organization) and RBV
(Resource-Based Model) models (Hitt, 2011) and Porter's 5 Forces Models (Williams, 2019; Hitt, 2011; O'Brien, 2003 and
Laudon, 2012). But because of its wider scope, relations within the regional economic system are more complex. In complex
relationships of dynamic environment, we must combine several approaches, not only one approach.
3. KNOWLEDGE IN REGIONAL ECONOMIC SYSTEM
Knowledge is key element in regional development and is an important content in regional management (Zao, 2011, p. 43-45).
Continuity of regional development depends on the extent to which the effectiveness of the output of knowledge produced is
able to follow changes in the environment. The nature of knowledge must also be understood as an environment that has high
dynamics because it is always changing. Knowledge as a resource in an economic system can be understood as a cycle process
where knowledge develops through the process. Using the TIM and TKD perspective, Jeannerat (2016) well illustrates how
knowledge is absorbed into the production and consumption subsystems in a cycle within territorial area. Unfortunately, it does
not discuss the environmental aspects.
In the regional context, the production system (Jeannerat, 2016, p. 3) can be compared with the interaction of 4 actors (Zao,
2010, p. 44) in an environment called the knowledge ecosystem (Noennig, 2014, p. 1360) so that it can form a conceptual
framework. Knowledge ecosystems will become a production system that will result in the development of technology and
innovation which will ultimately result in increasing regional competitive value (Zao, 2010; Pachura, 2013).
According to Jeannerat (2016) knowledge in an economic system will experience a process of co-evolution along with changes in
the environment, so that to find the right strategy must be predictability (Zao, 2010). To simplify planning, Jeannerat (2016)
categorizes Knowledge valuation according to its economic system into four; Knowledge Marketization, Knowledge
Improvement, knowledge adaptation and knowledge co-development. Through different contexts, knowledge undergoes a
renewal process due to market orientation, improvement and adaptation and development carried out collectively by all actors
in the economic system.
Adopting the thought of Pachura (2013, p. 116), knowledge as a resource absorbed in production system (Jeannerat, 2016, p. 3)
will be processed by actors in regional knowledge ecosystem where the process consists of "learning and transferring
knowledge, sharing knowledge and creating innovation, interaction and trust arising from the cultural context and local
environment. Similar to Pachura, Dirks and Ferrin (2001) in Keszey (2016, p. 3699) state the importance of trust. According to
them, “trust is an essential element in positive human relationships and creates a collaborative environment by providing
people with feelings of security and attachments."
The interaction between actors in regional knowledge system is considered as the most appropriate in the global era as it is
today. Zao (2010) calls it "collective learning," while Jarvi (2018) calls it the "collectives knowledge ecosystem." Globalization
causes the physical boundaries between systems to become increasingly blurred so that collective learning is not limited to
internal (regional) information but can absorb information from global environment. Therefore, in the conceptual framework
image (Figure 3), the regional boundary shows a dashed line illustrating that character. In fact, it does not rule out the possibility
of collaboration between regions in the field of knowledge development (Zao, 2011; Jeannerat, 2016; Keszey, 2016; Pachura,
2013; Romanova et al., 2019; Vorontsov, 2015; Noennig, 2014).
Journal of Business, Economics and Finance -JBEF (2019), Vol.8(2). p.127-132 Hatneny, Saraswati, Hardaningtyas
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
DOI: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2019.1043 130
4. KEY ACTORS
Key actors who play many important roles in knowledge ecosystem are: First, the government (Zao, 2011; Pachura, 2013; Jarvi,
2018 and Jeannerat, 2016) through its institutions. They have a very crucial role because they are responsible for the
environmental situations and conditions in which business people and other actors interact to develop knowledge. The
government are also responsible for system infrastructure which ensures that the knowledge process can run well. A number of
barriers to the flow of capital, resources and labor; incentives for new companies (Gurvich, 2016); transportation infrastructure
and public services (Krumins, 2015 and Nakamura, 2013) are examples of the role of government in an economic system. For
this reason, the government must always refer to global trends in the development of knowledge so that they are not left
behind.
Figure 2: Schematic representation of regional innovation (Zao, 2016)
Second, academics include research institutions and universities (Zao, 2011; Pachura, 2013; Jarvi, 2018 and Jeannerat, 2016). As
stated by Pachura (2013), "The scientific and research environment should also cooperate with companies." In this section Jarvi
(2018, p. 1524) states that universities occupy key roles and central actors in the knowledge ecosystem.
Third, companies or business organizations (Zao, 2011; Pachura, 2013; Jarvi, 2018 and Jeannerat, 2016). Zao (2011) emphasizes
the importance of companies as the spearhead in an economic system. Knowledge resources generated by research institutions
and universities are absorbed and implemented by the company. Then the company embodies and delivers into the
consumption system. Although its role is vital, but without a facilitator by other actors, it is impossible for a company to achieve
optimal competitiveness.
The fourth is an intermediary agent (Zao, 2011), although it is not mentioned in other literature sources but this is quite
interesting. In this regards, Zao (2011) appears to be so aware of the intermediation function represented by archives,
museums, non-governmental institutions and others. Zao (2011) describes an intermediary agent as having an important role in
strengthening the flow of communication and knowledge with the other three actors. Figure 2 shows four actors (Zao, 2011)
that are different from the concept of 3 actors (Pachura, 2013; Jarvi, 2018 and Jeannerat, 2016).
Journal of Business, Economics and Finance -JBEF (2019), Vol.8(2). p.127-132 Hatneny, Saraswati, Hardaningtyas
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
DOI: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2019.1043 131
4. CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
From the discussion above, relationships between concepts can be arranged in the form of a conceptual framework (figure 3) as
follows:
Figure 3: Regional Knowledge Value Chain (own elaboration from several sources)
5. CONCLUSION
In the value chain context, the value of knowledge is not only important, but knowledge also becomes the core, or ranks first, in
the value chain. Then good understanding of how knowledge is absorbed, how it is processed and developed, is also important
because it will determine the quality of output that will be produced in a value chain.
The concept of "ecosystem" in the field of natural science turned out to be used also in the field of economics. Borrowing the
term "ecosystem" can help explain how knowledge is absorbed, processed, and developed through the interaction of actors in
regional economic system. Regional knowledge ecosystems are the key to whether creation, improvement, development of
innovation can work well. In this case the government with its regulations and policies will determine the conductivity of the
interaction of other actors in the knowledge value chain process.
In the regional knowledge context, the creation and development of competitive values depend on knowledge ecosystem in the
region. Good collaboration between 4 actors (government, universities/research institution, agencies and firms) in the
ecosystem is crucial for regional competitiveness.
This paper has not discussed the factors that can hinder the process of regional value chain knowledge. It is suggest that further
analysis can deepen and broaden some more understandings of knowledge in the context of regional economics. Because the
environment is always changing, new concepts and new propositions will continue to emerge in place of the old ones.
Government
Agencies
Firms
Universities
Knowledge
Marketization
Knowledge
Improvement
Knowledge
Adaptation
Knowledge co-
development
Regional Knowledge Ecosystem
Knowledge Valuation
Global
Competitiveness
Advantage
Global Environment
Journal of Business, Economics and Finance -JBEF (2019), Vol.8(2). p.127-132 Hatneny, Saraswati, Hardaningtyas
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
DOI: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2019.1043 132
REFERENCES
Cadil, J., Petkovova, L. and Blatna, D. (2014). Human Capital, Economic Structure and Growth. Procedia Economics and Finance. 12. 85-92
Gasperz, V. (2005). Total Quality Management. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Umum
Gurvich, Evsey. (2016). Institutional constraints and economic development. Russian Journal of Economics. 2. 349-374
Hitt, M.A., Ireland, R.D. and Hoskisson, R. E. (2011). Strategic Management: Competitiveness and Globalization Concepts. 9th Edition. South-
Western Cengage Learning
Jarvi, K., Almpanopoulou, A. and Ritala, P. (2018). Organization of Knowledge Ecosystems: Prefigurative and Partial Forms. Research Policy. 47.
1523-1537
Jeannerat, H. and Kebir, L. (2016). Knowledge, Resources and Markets: What Economic System of Valuation? Regional Studies. 50. 274-288
Krumins, G., Krumina, I. and Rozentale S. (2015). Preconditions for Regional Economic Growth at the District Level in Vidzeme, Latvia. Procedia -
Social and Behavioral Sciences. 213. 117-122
Laudon, Kenneth C. and Laudon, Jane P. (2012). Management Information System: Managing the Digital Firm. 12th Edition. Pearson Education
Inc.
Noennig, J.R., Scheler, A.M., Piskorek, K., and Barski, J. (2014) Towards knowledge ecosystems: Modelling Knowledge Dynamics in
Environmental Systems. Procedia Computer Science. 35. 1360-1369
O’Brien, J.A. and Marakas, G.M. (2003). Management Information System, 10th Edition, New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin
Pachura, P. (2013). “Cognitive Economic Geography”- Evolution of Regional Strategies. Procedia Economics and Finance. 6. 115-119
Romanova, A., Abdurakhmanov, A., Ilyin V., Vygnanova, M. and Skrebutene, E. (2019). Formation of a Regional industrial cluster on the basis of
coordination of business entities' interests. Procedia Computer Science. 149. 525-528
Stevenson, William J. (2012). Operations Management 11 th ed. New York. McGraw-Hill
Vorontsov, D., Shikhalev, A. and Semushina, K. (2015).Using of cultural heritage in the socio-economic development strategy of the EU regions.
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 188. 163-169
Williams, Kevan. (2009). Strategic Management. New York. DK Publishing
Zhao, J. and de Pablos, P.O. (2011). Regional knowledge management: the perspective of management theory. Behaviour & Information
Technology. 30. 39-49