ArticlePDF Available

Gender & Development Overcoming the 'tyranny of the urgent': integrating gender into disease outbreak preparedness and response Overcoming the 'tyranny of the urgent': integrating gender into disease outbreak preparedness and response



This article contributes to discussions on the gender dimensions of disease outbreaks, and preparedness policies and responses, by providing a multi-level analysis of gender-related gaps, particularly illustrating how the failure to challenge gender assumptions and incorporate gender as a priority at the global level has national and local impacts. The implications of neglecting gender dynamics, as well as the potential of equity-based approaches to disease outbreak responses, is illustrated through a case study of the Social Enterprise Network for Development (SEND) Sierra Leone, a non-government organisation (NGO) based in Kailahun, during the Ebola outbreak.
Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at
Gender & Development
ISSN: 1355-2074 (Print) 1364-9221 (Online) Journal homepage:
Overcoming the ‘tyranny of the urgent’: integrating
gender into disease outbreak preparedness and
Julia Smith
To cite this article: Julia Smith (2019) Overcoming the ‘tyranny of the urgent’: integrating gender
into disease outbreak preparedness and response, Gender & Development, 27:2, 355-369, DOI:
To link to this article:
Published online: 28 Jun 2019.
Submit your article to this journal
View Crossmark data
Overcoming the tyranny of the urgent: integrating gender into
disease outbreak preparedness and response
Julia Smith
This article contributes to discussions on the gender dimensions of
disease outbreaks, and preparedness policies and responses, by
providing a multi-level analysis of gender-related gaps, particularly
illustrating how the failure to challenge gender assumptions and
incorporate gender as a priority at the global level has national and
local impacts. The implications of neglecting gender dynamics, as well
as the potential of equity-based approaches to disease outbreak
responses, is illustrated through a case study of the Social Enterprise
Network for Development (SEND) Sierra Leone, a non-government
organisation (NGO) based in Kailahun, during the Ebola outbreak.
Cet article contribue aux discussions sur les dimensions sexospéciques
des ambées de maladies et aux politiques et interventions en matière
de préparation en proposant une analyse multi-niveaux des lacunes
liées au genre, et en illustrant en particulier comment le fait de ne pas
mettre en question les suppositions en matière de genre et de ne pas
incorporer le genre parmi les priorités au niveau mondial a des impacts
àléchelle nationale et locale. Les répercussions du manque dattention
accordée à la dynamique de genre, ainsi que le potentiel dapproches
basées sur léquité des interventions dans les situations de ambées de
maladies, sont illustrés grâce à une étude de cas du Social Enterprise
Network for Development (SEND) Sierra Leone, une organisation non
gouvernementale (ONG) basée à Kailahun, durant la ambée de
maladie à virus Ebola.
Proporcionando un análisis de múltiples niveles sobre los vacíos
relacionados con el género, el presente artículo contribuye a la
discusión sobre las dimensiones de género durante los brotes de
enfermedad, las políticas y las respuestas de preparación. En
particular, ilustra cómo incide a nivel local e internacional el hecho
de no cuestionar los supuestos vinculados al género y no incluir el
género como una prioridad. Un estudio de caso de la Red de
Empresas Sociales para el Desarrollo (SEND) de Sierra Leona, una
organización no gubernamental (ONG) con sede en Kailahun, explica
las implicaciones que tuvo descuidar las dinámicas de género
durante el brote de ébola, y analiza las posibilidades de impulsar
enfoques basados en la equidad en las respuestas implementadas
frente a brotes de enfermedades.
Health; gender; disease
outbreak; Ebola; epidemic;
policy; crisis response; care
© 2019 Oxfam GB
CONTACT Julia Smith
2019, VOL. 27, NO. 2, 355369
Since 2000, there have been a series of outbreaks of new, acute, or re-emerging commu-
nicable diseases that pose a threat of global spread. They have included Middle East res-
piratory syndrome (MERS) in Saudi Arabia and South Korea, epidemics of H1N1 and
H5N1 strains of inuenza, and severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), and the mos-
quito-carried Zika virus in South and Central America, as well as Ebola in West and Cen-
tral Africa. The West African Ebola outbreak from 2013 to 2016 attracted particular
attention to the need to address gender issues relating to the spread and control of infec-
tious diseases. A 2015 report from the Reference Group for Gender in Humanitarian
Action noted, Vigilance against a repeat escalation or future outbreak of the disease
(or any other similarly highly infectious virus) must incorporate the lessons learned on the
signicance of gender in the spread and control(2015, 1).
The gender dimensions of outbreaks are both physical and socially constructed. Some
diseases by their nature aect the sexes dierently: an example is the Zika virus, which may
result in a relatively mild infection but is particularly risky during pregnancy, as it is linked
to birth defects. Where gender roles and relations are concerned, the care roles fullled by
women are signicant as women frequently take on the majority of the burden and risk of
providing health care in the home, often with little external support. Availability of health
services, interactions with emergency responders, and health governance structures also all
have gender dimensions.
To respond to the threat of future epidemics, a High Level Panel on the Global
Response to Health Crises was set up by the United Nations (UN) Secretary-General in
April 2015 to draw together the lessons to be taken from the Ebola response, and propose
recommendations aiming to strengthen national and international systems to prevent and
respond eectively to future health crises (UN 2016). The High Level Panelsnal report,
published in 2017, included the recommendation, Focusing attention on the gender
dimensions of global health crises(Global Health Crises Task Force (GHCTF) 2017,
16). The High Level Panel noted the need to incorporate gender analysis into responses,
as well as recognise the critical role played by women in responding to health emergencies.
It further stated that policy-makers and outbreak responders need to pay attention to gen-
der-related roles and social and cultural practices(ibid., 17). Responding to recommen-
dations from the High Level Panels report, in May 2018, the World Health
Organization (WHO) and World Bank announced the creation of a Global Preparedness
Monitoring Board to:
Strengthen global health security through stringent independent monitoring and regular report-
ing of preparedness to tackle outbreaks, pandemics, and other emergencies with health conse-
quences. (WHO 2018,1)
If and how the board will integrate the recommendations related to gender remains to
be seen.
To date, as I will show in this article, gender analysis has been conspicuously absent
from policy debates, documents, and processes. Instead, it is argued, outbreak responses
356 J. SMITH
and policies are characterised by the tyranny of the urgent, which puts aside structural
issues in favour of addressing immediate biomedical needs (Davies and Bennett 2016,
1041). For example, Sophie Harman (2016) presents a damning critique, from the per-
spective of women and gender issues, of the international response to the Ebola crisis.
Lack of gender analysis also extends to research on outbreak responses. While health sys-
tems and policy research has begun to incorporate gender analysis, few publications have
addressed gender issues relating to disease outbreaks. Sara Davies and Belinda Bennett
note that, The vulnerabilities of women and girls during complex emergencies are equally
present during a public health emergency but are relatively underexamined in these cir-
cumstances compared to the study of gender, health and inequality during natural disas-
ters(2016, 1044). In a review of the research on both Ebola and Zika outbreaks, they
found that less than 1 per cent of published research discussed gender issues (ibid., 1054).
In this article, I aim to reect on the silences around gender and disease outbreaks. I do
this by sharing insights gained from a literature review of scholarly and policy documen-
tation on gender and infectious disease outbreaks conducted in 2018. The majority of my
analysis draws on examples from the Ebola and Zika responses, as most of the literature
focuses on these cases. However, examples from other outbreaks are also considered. In
order to illustrate the gendered impacts of disease outbreaks and responses on the lived
experiences of women and girls, a case study based on the work of the non-government
organisation (NGO) SEND Sierra Leone is included. The case study is drawn from the
reports SEND produced during and following the West African Ebola outbreak in
It is important to note that, while I worked for SEND Sierra Leone as Technical Advisor
during 20102011, I was not in Sierra Leone during the Ebola outbreak and am writing
this as an academic researcher, based at a Canadian university, and from a position of pri-
vilege that means I am unlikely to be vulnerable to disease outbreaks. I recognise that there
is a need to hear from those directly aected by disease outbreaks and health inequities in
order to inform responses that promote equity. I hope the more academic- and policy-
focused analysis that is presented here will also contribute to achieving these goals.
Methodology and approaches
A literature review using targeted key word searches (gender OR women OR feminist* OR
masculinity OR intersectional* AND outbreak OR epidemic OR pandemic AND policy
OR response OR preparedness) was conducted in various databases.
Publications that
discussed or evaluated disease outbreak policies and responses were used, including
both 20 peer-reviewed articles and 18 publications by organisations engaged in global
or public health.
Publications were then organised by policy level (global, national, and local) and
reviewed by applying a critical gender lens informed by gender and development
(G&D), feminist economics, and intersectional approaches.
G&D literature and practice raises awareness about how gender relations and assump-
tions shape humanitarian and development policies. G&D recognises that male bias is
more than just personal perception, but is also a blindness to the policies and structures
that operate in favour of men as a gender, and against women as a gender(Elson
1993, 238). This approach emphasises the need to identify and recognise conscious and
unconscious bias through gender-aware and gender-visible policies. Gender bias can be
exposed through questions such as: Do policies consider the diering roles and experi-
ences of men, women, and other social groups? Do they aim to maintain the status quo
or promote gender transformation?
Feminist economics has particularly documented how conventional approaches fail to
recognise womens unpaid labour and the economic, social, and opportunity costs
women incur while fullling care roles (Folbre 2006). Applying a feminist economics
lens, in this context, promotes questions such as: Do policies recognise how gender
norms impact the health-care roles men and women full during an outbreak? Do they
support or exploit unpaid care work?
Intersectionality recognises the multiple social and identity factors such as ethnicity,
race, religion, sexuality, and disability that shape individualsvulnerabilities to disease
outbreaks, as well as their capacity to cope during emergencies and engage with
responses (Hankivsky 2012). This research asks if and how policies and responses
address multiple vulnerabilities, the rights of marginalised groups, and structural inequi-
ties, while recognising that more in-depth analysis is needed to understand fully the
unique intersecting identity factors that are important in individualsexperiences of
dierent disease outbreaks.
Global gender gapsin policy documents on disease outbreaks
Analysis of global-level policy documents related to disease outbreaks reveals a notable
lack of gender analysis. There is no mention of gender inequality, womens particular
needs, or ensuring the health of marginalised groups, in most high-prole policy docu-
Outbreak-specic documents also lack gender analysis. WHOsEbola Response
Roadmap includes only one sentence about women (Harman 2016). The World Banks
(2014) report on The Economic Impact of the 2014 Ebola Epidemic did not discuss gen-
dered economic impacts of the epidemic. External assessments of the WHOs response,
which provide recommendations to prepare for future outbreaks, such as the report by
the Harvard-LSHTM Independent Panel on the Global Response to Ebola, also fail to
include any discussion of the gendered dimensions of the outbreak or response
(Moon et al.2015).
Documents from the Global Health Security Agenda (GHSA), a multi-sectoral and
multilateral eort, established under American leadership in 2014 to accelerate progress
towards disease outbreak preparedness, also do not include any degree of gender analy-
sis. The GHSA is currently developing a framework to guide its future direction. The
current draft of this framework (circulated in June 2018) does not mention gender or
other equity issues (GHSA 2018b). Other GHSA publications and policy documents,
such as country roadmaps (GHSA 2016) and progress reports (GHSA 2018b), also
do not include gender analysis.
358 J. SMITH
Gender and security during humanitarian crises an example of global policy failure
The failure of global policies to include gender reinforces a policy context that ignores how
women, men, and other groups experience outbreaks and responses dierently. For
example, the GHSA particularly promotes greater engagement of the security sector in dis-
ease outbreak preparedness and responses, oering a framework and umbrella under
which defense departments can collaborate on threat reduction(2018b, 1). Its policy sug-
gestions reveal the assumption, embedded in other disease outbreak preparedness policy
documents as well, that security-sector engagement will improve disease outbreak
responses for all concerned. Yet Fionnuala Ní Aoláin writes, one has to start any conver-
sation about security with an interrogation of the assumption that womens security and
mens security are identical(2010, 19). She notes that, womens security in times of
humanitarian crises requires a broad conception of security that encompasses physical,
social, economic, and sexual security(ibid., 21).
Yet the security sector including the police and the army is shaped by societal
norms, including gender norms, which often position women at a structural disadvantage
and potentially vulnerable to gender-based violence and abuse. Research indicates that the
deployment of security forces, on humanitarian as well as conict missions, corresponds
to an increase in gender-based violence (Tripp et al.2013). Hence the security sector is
rarely well-positioned to uphold and ensure that everyone in a community can realise
all of their securities.
Security sectors in many contexts are characterised by the dominance of hypermascu-
linity; a masculinity in which the strictures against femininity and homosexuality are
especially intense and in which physical strength and aggressiveness are paramount(Ní
Aoláin 2010, 15). Research on peacekeeping and humanitarian responses has documented
how hypermasculinity dominates other masculinities in times of crisis, where responders
are largely men and those suering the eects of crisis are feminised due to their disem-
powered position and reliance on security personal for access to necessities such as food
and health care (Tripp et al.2013). While there is no apparent research on hypermascu-
linity and disease outbreak responses, communities that have experienced the use of secur-
ity forces to conduct disease outbreak surveillance note these roles are dominated by men
and report feeling fearful of excessive use of force and of violence (Abramowitz et al.2015).
Global responses promoting security-sector engagement also fail to recognise that as
security sectors across the world remain male dominated, and that those in the higher
ranks often represent dominant social groups (such as those who identify as heterosexual
white males in Western contexts), decision-making rarely includes the perspectives of
women and marginalised groups (Ní Aoláin 2010). Sophie Harman (2016) argues that
the military actors involved in the Ebola response in Sierra Leone had the tendency not
only to overlook issues of gender dierence in how men and women experience disease,
but also to reproduce gender norms in masculinised spaces of decision-making and
implementation. The uncritical promotion of security-sector engagement in disease out-
break responses at the global level reinforces a specic type of masculine dominance in
decision-making and may exacerbate insecurity for women and marginalised groups.
Limiting national policies
The International Health Regulations (IHR) provide legally binding regulations on how
WHO member states prepare for, report on, and respond to health emergencies. Within
the IHR, gender only appears in terms of accounting for the concerns of travellers with
regard to their gender, ethnicity, religion, and sociocultural factors. In addition, only for-
mal health-care work is considered, neglecting any recognition of how the bulk of care
work during an emergency is conducted by women (discussed further below).
Under the IHR, state parties are required to meet core capacity standards, which are
measured according to the Joint External Evaluation of Core Capacity Framework (JEE),
a standardised tool used to assess country preparedness across 19 technical areas (WHO
2016a). While there is much debate about JEE components, processes, and eectiveness
(Wilson et al.2010), a feminist reading highlights the lack of gendered targets and indi-
cators. No targets refer to gender or other inequities, and none of the technical questions
which guide assessment of progress towards the targets request gender-disaggregated
data. For example, the target related to Workforce Development does not ask about the gen-
der composition of the health workforce or about supports for informal care work. There is
only one target that mentions marginalised groups; the immunisation target is for a func-
tioning national vaccine delivery system with nationwide reach, eective distributions,
access for marginalised populations, adequate cold chain, and ongoing quality control
that is able to respond to new disease threats(WHO 2016a, 29). Yet none of the technical
questions follow up on how delivery systems might reach marginalised populations.
Under the target related to preparedness for zoonotic diseases (diseases that can be
transmitted from animals to people), a technical question asks, Is there a plan in place
to address factors which might prevent farmers/owners from reporting animal disease
(may include lack of familiarity with reporting process, lack of indemnity, social stigma)?
(WHO 2016a, 17). While this question recognises that stigma can impact surveillance
eectiveness, the JEE does not include questions regarding if there are policies in place
to protect individuals, particularly those already at risk, from stigma (e.g. legislation
that prohibits evicting tenants or ring workers based on health status). While the JEE
could be a tool to encourage state policies to consider the gendered dynamics of outbreak
preparedness, it instead maintains androcentric, or male-centred, assumptions that purely
technocratic responses are adequate.
There is widespread consensus that a primary gap in disease outbreak preparedness, by
both recipient and donor states, is inadequate investment in health system strengthening
(HSS) (Regmi et al.2015). However, HSS not only requires resources, it also must include
specic policies to address gender and other inequities. Sarah Payne writes:
Health systems that are gender blind’–that is, where gender dierentials in health services are not
recognised may maintain and/or reinforce gender inequalities and gender inequity in wider
society, both in their day-to-day operation and in their development of health policies. (2009,4)
As there is substantial research on the need to, and how to, integrate gender and
other equity issues into HSS, it will not be repeated here (Morgan et al.2016). What
360 J. SMITH
is particularly relevant is that HSS eorts related to disease outbreak preparedness have
largely failed to address equity issues. For example, the Vaccine Alliances (GAVI) HSS
programme does not incorporate specic goals, targets, or supports related to gender
(GAVI 2016).
Where gender is mentioned in HSS policies related to disease outbreak preparedness,
it is most often conated with maternal and child health, reecting assumptions that
women are solely responsible for reproductive and family health (Witter et al.2017).
For example, Canadas Feminist International Assistance Policy commits to strengthen-
ing health systems and ghting infectious diseases primarily by funding maternal, new-
born, and child health initiatives (GAC 2018). While maternal health must be a priority
during outbreaks (as is discussed further below), the nearly exclusive focus on reproduc-
tion perpetuates gender norms that conne women to maternal roles, while failing to
address womens marginalisation in society or the health eects of inequality (Yamin
and Boulanger 2013). The focus on maternal health also obscures the roles and respon-
sibilities of men related to reproductive health, the health needs of women unrelated to
reproduction, and of the right to sexual health for people of all genders who cannot or
chose not to have children.
This is not to say that comprehensive sexual and reproductive health (SRH) is a not an
important priority within disease outbreak preparedness and response. Disease outbreaks
can be exacerbated by and exacerbate lack of access to SRH services, which are already
restricted by prohibitive laws and customs in many contexts. The South American Zika
outbreak illustrates the importance of SRH services to eective disease outbreak response.
In most cases Zika causes only mild infections. However, it can have severe reproductive
health impacts and cause congenital syndromes in infants born to mothers infected by
Zika. Consequently, family planning to ensure protective measures are taken prior to
and during pregnancy is the best way to prevent this health concern (Guttmacher Institute
2018). The WHO recommends countries aected by Zika
provide equitable access to quality sexual and reproductive healthcare and services for all women
and adolescent girls of reproductive age in Zika-aected areas, including access to family planning,
counselling, contraceptive services, including emergency contraception, and supplies, quality pre-
natal care, quality obstetric care, safe abortion services (where legal), and post-abortion care.
(WHO 2016b,1)
Central and South American states aected by Zika, however, have done little to change
prohibitive laws or improve access to SRH services, instead simply arguing women should
avoid pregnancy. In 2017, 24 million women of reproductive age in Latin American and
the Caribbean had an unmet need for modern contraception, and more than 97 per cent
lived in countries with restrictive abortion laws (Guttmacher Institute 2018, 1). A recent
assessment in Brazil found no increase in contraception use since the Zika outbreak, con-
cluding this is due to continued poor access (Bahamondes et al.2016). As analysis from
the Guttmacher Institute notes, Blanket recommendations that women avoid pregnancy
in several Latin American and Caribbean countries [aected by Zika] unacceptably shift
the burden of responding to the crisis to individual women(2016, 1).
Such recommendations also exacerbate existing inequities. While Zika is a threat to all
pregnant women, wealthier women can often protect themselves by accessing contracep-
tion and travelling to either seek abortion services or avoid exposure to Zika while preg-
nant, and impoverished women cannot (Harris et al.2016). Consequently, children with
Zika infection-related disabilities are disproportionately born to women of low socioeco-
nomic status (Lowe et al.2018). The burden of care for children born with congenital syn-
dromes due to Zika also falls largely on women from lower socioeconomic groups living in
remote areas. Most of these women give up their jobs or studies to care for their children,
and anecdotal reports suggest many become single parents (Diniz 2017).
Poor access to SRH services and restrictive laws combine with weak health systems to
create a context of poor maternal health care, which is exacerbated when scarce resources
are diverted to outbreak responses. During the West African Ebola outbreak, Médecins
Sans Frontières (MSF) closed its obstetric and paediatric care facilities in aected areas,
depriving the local population of essential services(Stockhold Evaluation Unit 2016,
12). Across the region, the closure of NGOs and non-Ebola health services resulted in
reduced access to family planning services, increasing the risk of unplanned pregnancies.
Quarantine policies prevented pregnant women from accessing care and women suspected
of being infected were denied care (Erland and Dahl 2017). Midwives struggled with a lack
of clinic guidelines and little information on how to care for pregnant women in the con-
text of Ebola. Maternity care was only provided in clinics after Ebola results were obtained,
causing delays in care which contributed to increased foetal and maternal deaths.
Across the Ebola-infected region, the number of women giving birth in hospitals and
health clinics dropped by 30 per cent and the maternal mortality rate increased 75 per
cent (Davies and Bennett 2016, 1043). A midwife who cared for pregnant women with
Ebola noted,
We have some kind of moral imperative, but as a global community, I dont think we have the
moral voice to be able to say: yes, we did the best we could for pregnant women in Sierra
Leonebecause we didnt. (quoted in Erland and Dahl 2017, 26)
Implications for local realities
The impact of outbreaks on care work
Lack of investment in health systems at the national level has particular gendered impacts
at the local level, resulting in a downloading of care responsibilities on to women, a situ-
ation which is exacerbated during outbreaks. Sophie Harman explains that the feminised
unpaid reproductive care economy acts as a shock absorberin periods of crisis
Women absorb the burden of care through self-exploitation (leading to direct and indirect
health impacts on women as a gender), reliance on family, or outsourcing care roles to
poorer women(2016, 525).
While women often view care work as their duty and take pride in it, they also report
hardships related to lack of resources, and the desire to be able to access professional ser-
vices when necessary. Assessments of the care work associated with the HIV epidemic in
362 J. SMITH
sub-Saharan Africa demonstrate that women providing care often sacrice their own
health, safety, and resources (Ogden et al.2006).
During the West African Ebola outbreak, the majority of care was provided by
women, many of whom continue to suer from the psychological trauma of being solely
responsible for the ill and from the fear of contracting and passing on the virus, par-
ticularly to their children (Abramowitz et al.2015). Noting the sensitive nature of
care work, Fionnuala Ní Aoláin writes that humanitarian assistance and other forms
of crisis intervention should not increase womens vulnerability, neither by undermining
their coping strategies nor by reinforcing damaging coping strategies(2010, 13). In
other words, the care work provided by women should be supported, while providing
alternatives that empower women.
While there are numerous examples of programmes run by states and NGOs providing
supports to home-based care providers in non-emergency contexts, these remain reliant
on the unpaid care work of women, are usually poorly resourced, and are ill-equipped
to deal with outbreaks. For example, during the 2008 cholera epidemic in Zimbabwe,
home-based care providers lacked access to basic essentials such as oral rehydration
salts (Mason 2009). Reports from Zimbabwes 2018 cholera outbreak suggest the situation
remains much the same if not worse (Burke 2018). During emergencies, inadequate sup-
port for home-based care is exacerbated. Existing programmes are often cancelled as
organisations suspend operations out of fear of infection, and outbreak responses rarely
include support for home-based care providers.
Emergency response organisations also frequently fail to consider gender roles, such
as those relate to care work, when designing communications materials. MSF notes the
eectiveness of its health promotional materials during the West African Ebola outbreak
was limited by lack of understanding of local gender norms (Stockhold Evaluation Unit
2016). Public health materials, such as posters and radio advertisements, advised against
touching and cleaning up after those who appeared sick. Such isolation messages
were irrelevant to women responsible for caring for family members at home. As
Sharon Abramowitz et al.reected, Dont touch messages do not recognise that
women have to touch to give care(2015, 11). Isolation messages can also indirectly
stigmatise those required to provide care by highlighting their potential role in
transmission. Instead, gender-sensitive communications would answer questions
like, How do I manage a family of children, including infants and toddlers, in
quarantine?(ibid., 11).
A case study: SEND Sierra Leone
Sierra Leone, bordering Liberia and Guinea, ranks 184 (out of 189) on the Human Devel-
opment Index, and Kailahun District is one of the poorest regions of the country (UNDP
2017). Only 32 per cent of the adult population is literate in Sierra Leone, and less than 20
per cent of women in Kailahun can read and write (SEND Sierra Leone 2018). The
maternal mortality rate 83.3 per every 1,000 live births (UNDP 2017,1)is among
the worst in the world.
The Social Enterprise Network for Development (SEND), a West African-based NGO,
began operations in Kailahun in 2008. SEND Sierra Leones mission is to work to promote
good governance and equality for women and men in Sierra Leone(SEND Sierran Leone
2018, 1). It implements Livelihood Security, Women in Governance, and Accountability in
the Health Sector projects. In addition to mainstreaming gender within its activities,
SEND facilitates, as part of the Women in Governance project, the Kailahun Women in
Governance Network (KWiGN). The network includes over a hundred womens groups
across the district which engage in district-level policy processes, conduct gender audits
of political parties, support female candidates during elections, co-ordinate micronance
savings groups, and host weekly radio shows.
Kailahun was the region most aected by the West African Ebola outbreak. Health sys-
tems collapsed, and markets and schools closed. Trade and travel disruptions resulted in
food shortages and rising prices of essential items. Those in aected households destroyed
their possessions out of fear of contagion, and in some cases houses were burnt to the
ground. By July 2014, the district was recording an average of 30 conrmed Ebola cases
per day (Ayamga 2014, 2). In one community where the KWiGN co-ordinates a micro-
nance project, six out of 35 women from a savings group died; in another, nine out of 35
died within a few days of each other (Kamara 2015, 1).
SENDs reports during the epidemic share the stories of those aected: a single mother
died, leaving three children to be cared for by their disabled grandmother; another grand-
mother lost seven members of her family and was left caring for the remaining two chil-
dren; a 22-year-old woman lost both parents, becoming responsible for six younger
siblings (Kamara 2015). A SEND evaluation found that women were providing the vast
majority of care to orphans and faced the additional hardship of stigma. The report
notes, In situations where the husband and wife were infected, and the wife survived,
the in-laws would accuse her to have bewitched the deceased husband. She will be rejected
in the community, as well as evicted from her marital home(Kohteh 2015, 5).
SEND staobserved that the majority of the national and international response eorts
were primarily directed at health service delivery and failed to address the contextual and
cultural factors causing the disease to spread (Kohteh 2015). While these included denial
and traditional practices, they were also related to a lack of access to water, low literacy
rates and the need to travel to nd food as local markets were closed. Remote communities
in the district were not receiving any services or supports. Because sensitisation activities
did not specically reach out to women, women were not participating to the same degree
as men.
To respond to the immediate needs of those aected, SEND developed a relief pro-
gramme with support from partners such as CORDAID Netherlands and Christian Aid
UK. Funds provided 250 families aected by the outbreak with household goods, food,
and a monthly stipend to meet basic needs. The KWiGN co-ordinated a community foster
parent programme for Ebola orphans, and used its radio show to speak out against stigma,
providing education about how Ebola spread and how to care for those who were ill while
avoiding infection. The radio show was particularly crucial in reaching remote commu-
nities where no other information services were being provided (Kohteh 2015).
364 J. SMITH
While SEND did not have the capacity to contribute to the emergency health response,
it set a goal of improving health systems to respond to those concerns that were being neg-
lected and to protect against future outbreaks. Along with international partners, SEND
helped connect the district hospital to the municipal water supply, renovated peripheral
health units, provided supplies such as blood pressure machines of health units bought
motorbikes for health sta, and trained staon how to use mobile technology.
SEND also co-ordinated Village Ebola Watch Committees to provide sensitisation and
support to those communities not reached by other programmes. The committees
included KWiGN members and Christian and Muslim leaders. SEND found that includ-
ing religious leaders resulted in local acceptance of the committeesmessages, and that
including KWiGN members increased womens participation in sensitisation workshops.
The committees also worked with security personnel, deployed by the government to con-
duct surveillance and monitor travel, acting as a liaison between security forces and com-
munity members.
KWiGN members continue to participate in surveillance activities at the 53 border
checkpoints between the district and neighbouring Guinea and Liberia. At some of
the more remote locations they are the only health monitors presents; in others, they
work alongside security personnel (SEND Sierra Leone 2018). An evaluation of
SENDs Ebola responses programmes nds, The organization employed a commu-
nity-based approach that puts local community members (particularly women) and
local authorities at the heart of their programming and this has made their projects
very successful over the years(Kohteh 2015, 4). It further notes, The collaboration
between SEND and KWiGN contributed to the projects high acceptance rates among
the local populations(ibid.).
This case study demonstrates both the gendered impacts of the Ebola outbreak and the
potential of responses that aim to promote gender equity. Importantly, SEND established
equity goals at the onset of its programmes, building capacity through its development
initiatives that it was then able to capitalise on when the Ebola outbreak occurred.
While the KWiGN was initiated to advance womens leadership, it responded to the crisis
by transforming into an outbreak response team that provided gender-sensitive care, sen-
sitisation, and surveillance. KWiGNs leadership capabilities and networks enable SEND
to build partnerships with other actors, such as religious leaders. While SEND provided
supplies and stipends to those providing care, KWiGN members also took on roles in
addition to care-giving, such as within Village Ebola Watch Committees. Through these
activities, womens needs were prioritised and the position of women leaders was
reinforced, putting them at the centre of the response. SENDs response did not choose
between addressing immediate practical needs or structural inequities it did both.
Lessons learned
There seems to be an unspoken agreement demonstrated by the lack of gender analysis
in global-level policy documents that gender is not relevant to global-level processes. Yet
global policies inuence local health outcomes (indeed, if they did not, we would have to
ask what the point is of all those very expensive meetings at global institutions!). The
securitisation of outbreak responses puts military personnel in local communities, poten-
tially leading to increased rates of gender-based violence. The failure of the IHR to con-
sider gender allows assumptions that all people benet equally from one set of policies
to trickle down to state outbreak preparedness planning. The lack of investment in HSS
at the global and national level contributes to failures to provide comprehensive SRH ser-
vices, and continued reliance on, but lack of recognition of, the care work conducted by
women during outbreaks. Lack of consideration of gender roles by health organisations
translates into public health messages that are irrelevant and potentially stigmatising.
Global policy responses can learn from examples such as SEND Sierra Leone. SEND did
not include a gendered approach in its response as an afterthought; it was at the heart of
the response because SEND had an established gender strategy. The emergency context of
disease outbreaks makes it essential to include gender in preparedness policies, as addres-
sing structural issues, such as gender inequality, require foresight and planning. At the glo-
bal level this could be achieved through greater recognition of the gendered and other
social dimensions of the IHR, which could then inuence national policies through the
development of JEE indicators and targets reective of an intersectional approach.
These could be developed through consultation with feminist activist and social move-
ments, an approach that has proven successful within Global AIDS Response Progress
(GARP) reporting processes, where civil society organisations have worked with the
UNAIDS Monitoring and Reference Group to develop indicators on gender-based vio-
lence, stigma, and the rights of marginalised groups (Smith et al.2017).
Another key lesson from the Ebola case study is that the leadership role of the
KWiGN was essential in reaching out to other women, communicating eectively,
and building partnerships with other actors, such as security personal. Evidence from
other sectors demonstrates that gender and related rights issues will be neglected if
there is not a designated responsibility for inclusion. There needs to be concerted
eorts to engage women and members of marginalised groups in all levels of disease
outbreak policymaking and response. For example, the Disease Outbreak Preparedness
Monitoring Board could include a gender focal point to solicit input from those most
aected by disease outbreaks. Davies and Bennett (2016) advocate a greater role for the
Special Rapporteur on the Right to Health within disease outbreak policymaking.
National and local-level policy processes need to innovate to create spaces for greater
engagement with women and marginalised populations.
All levels of response need specic policies in place to ensure compressive sexual and
reproductive health at all times. One option would be to adoption of the Minimum Initial
Service Package (MISP) for Reproductive Health, a co-ordinated set of priority activities for
decreasing SRH-related morbidity and mortality during an emergency, to infectious disease
outbreaks. Programming and policy responses similarly need to rst recognise the care
work conducted largely by women in such situations, and then nd ways to support such
work without relying on it. This includes strengthening health systems to provide health-
care options and providing opportunities for women in all aspects of the response, whether
it be through formalised work in the health sector, decision-making, or security.
366 J. SMITH
While it may not be clear when and where the next major outbreak will occur, we
unfortunately do know that it will occur. In order to overcome the tyranny of the urgent,
there is an immediate need to incorporate gender-based analysis, the voices of women and
marginalised groups, and feminist perspectives in disease outbreak preparedness and
1. These databases consisted of Google, Google Scholar, PubMed, and Eldis.
2. These include the Global Monitoring of Disease Outbreak Preparedness: Preventing the Next Pan-
demic published by the Harvard Global Health Institute (2018) and The Neglected Dimension of
Global Security: A Framework to Counter Infectious Disease Crises published by the National
Academy of Medicine (2016).
Research for this article was supported by Global Aairs Canada, and the Social Sciences and
Humanities Research Council of Canadas International Policy Ideas Challenge
Notes on contributor
Julia Smith is a Research Associate in the Faculty of Health Sciences at Simon Fraser University, Canada.
She has worked for health and development organisations in Africa, Europe, and North America. Postal
address: c/o The Editor, Gender & Development. Email:
Abramowitz, Sharon, Kristen McLean, Sarah McKune, Kevin Bardosh, Mosoka Fallah, Josephine
Monger, Kodjo Tehoungue and Patricia Omidian (2015)Community-centered responses to
Ebola in urban Liberia: the view from below,PLoS neglected tropical diseases 9(4): e0003706
Ayamga, Joseph (2014)Update On Ebola In Kailahun District, Where SEND Works In Sierra Leone,
Kailahun: SEND Sierra Leone
Bahamondes, Luis, Ali Moazzam, Ilza Monteiro and Arlete Fernandes (2016)Contraceptive sales in
the setting of the Zika virus epidemic,Human Reproduction 32(1): 8893
Burke, Jason (2018)Medieval cholera outbreak exposes huge challenges in Zimbabwe,The Guardian,
20 September,
outbreak-exposes-zimbabwe-problems (last checked 9 April 2019)
Davies, Sara and Belinda Bennett (2016)A gendered human rights analysis of Ebola and Zika: locating
gender in global health emergencies,International Aairs 92(5): 104160
Diniz, Debora (2017)Zika: From the Brazilian Backlands to Global Threat, London: Zed Books
Elson, Diane (1993)Gender-aware analysis and development economics,Journal of International
Development 5(2): 23747
Erland, Elin and Bente Dahl (2017)‘‘Midwivesexperiences of caring for pregnant women admitted to
Ebola centres in Sierra Leone,Midwifery, 55: 2328
Folbre, Nancy (2006)Measuring Care: Gender, Empowerment, and the Care Economy,Journal of
Human Development 7(2): 18399
GAVI (2016)Health system strengthening evaluations 2013-2015, Gavi: the Vaccine Alliance, https:// (last checked
9 April 2019)
GHSA (2016)Interagency Roadmap: Sierra Leone,
ghsa-roadmaps/ghsa-sierra-leone-roadmap.pdf (last checked 9 April 2019)
Global Health Crises Task Force (GHCTF) (2017)Final Report, Geneva: United Nations, https://www. (last checked 9
April 2019)
Global Health Security Agenda (GHSA) (2018a)Global Health Security Agenda 2024 Framework
4-framework-v2-july2018.pdf (last checked 9 April 2019)
Global Health Security Agenda (GHSA) (2018b)Implementing the Global Health Security Agenda:
Progress and Impact from U.S. Government Investments,
s-investments.pdf (last checked 9 April 2019)
Government of Canada (GAC) (2018)Canadas Feminist International Assistance Policy,http://
policy-politique.aspx?lang=eng#5.2 (last checked 9 April 2019)
Guttmacher Institute (2018)Abortion in Latin America and the Caribbean,https://www.guttmacher.
org/fact-sheet/abortion-latin-america-and-caribbean (last checked 9 April 2019)
Hankivsky, Olena (2012)Womens health, mens health, and gender and health: Implications of inter-
sectionality,Social Science and Medicine 74(11): 1712720
Harman, Sophie (2016)Ebola, gender and conspicuously invisible women in global health governance,
Third World Quarterly 37(3): 52441
Harris, Lisa, Neil Silverman and Mary FaithMarshall (2016)The Paradigm of the Paradox: Women,
Pregnant Women, and the Unequal Burdens of the Zika Virus Pandemic,The American Journal of
Bioethics 16(5): 14
Kamara, Siapha (2015)SEND Ebola Update On Kailahun District:Where SEND Works, Kailahun: SEND
Sierra Leone
Kohteh, William (2015)Evaluation of the Kailahun District Remote Villages Ebola Watch Capacity
Building Project, Kailahun: SEND Sierra Leone
Lowe, Rachel, Christovam Barcellos, Patrícia Brasil, Oswaldo G. Cruz, Nildimar Alves Honório,
Hannah Kuper and Marilia Sá Carvalho (2018)The Zika Virus Epidemic in Brazil: From
Discovery to Future Implications,International Journal of Environmental Research and Public
Health 15(1): 96, (last checked 9 April 2019)
Mason, Peter (2009)Zimbabwe experiences the worst epidemic of cholera in Africa,The Journal of
Infection in Developing Countries 3(02): 14851
Moon, Surei, Dev Sridhar, Muhammad Pate, Ashish Jha, Chelsea Clinton, Sophie Delaunay,
Valnora Edwin, Mosoka Fallah, David Fidler, Laurie Garrett, Eric Goosby, Lawrence Gostin,
David Heymann, Kelley Lee, Gabriel Leung, Stephen Morrison, Jorge Saavedra, Marcel Tanner,
Jennifer Leigh, Benjamin Hawkins, Liana Woskie and Peter Piot (2015)Will Ebola change the
game? Ten essential reforms before the next pandemic. The report of the Harvard-LSHTM
Independent Panel on the Global Response to Ebola,The Lancet 386(10009): 220421
Morgan, Rosemary, Asha George, Sarah Ssali, Kate Hawkins, Sassy Molyneux and Sally Theobald
(2016)How to do (or not to do) gender analysis in health systems research,Health Policy and
Planning 31(8): 106978
Ní Aoláin, Fionnuala (2010)Women, Vulnerability and Humanitarian Emergencies,Michigan
Journal of Gender and Law 18(1): 123
Ogden, Jessica, Simel Esimand and Caren Grown (2006)Expanding the care continuum for HIV/
AIDS: bringing carers into focus,Health Policy and Planning 21(5): 33342
368 J. SMITH
Payne, Sarah (2009)How can gender equity be addressed through health systems? Policy Brief 12, Geneva:
World Health Organization,
(last checked 9 April 2019)
Reference Group for Gender in Humanitarian Action (2015) Humanitarian Crisis in West Africa
(Ebola) Gender Alert: February 2015, Inter-Agency Standing Committee, (last
checked 9 April 2019)
Regmi, Krishna, Ruth Gilbert and Colin Thunhurst (2015)How can health systems be strengthened
to control and prevent an Ebola outbreak? A narrative review,Infection Ecology & Epidemiology 5, no.
1. doi:10.3402/iee.v5.28877
SEND Sierra Leone (2018)Strategic Plan 2019-2024: Empowering Citizens to Make Sierra Leone Work
For Equity, Kenema: SEND Sierra Leone
Smith Julia, Chris Mallouris, Lee Kelley and Alfvén Tobia (2017) The Role of Civil Society
Organizations in Monitoring the Global AIDS Response, AIDS and Behavior 21(S1): 4450
Stockholm Evaluation Unit (2016)OCB Ebola Review Summary Report, April 2016 - Guinea, https:// (last checked 9 April 2019)
Tripp, Aili Mari, Myra Marx Ferree and Christina Ewig (2013)Gender, violence, and human security :
critical feminist perspectives, New York: NYU Press
UN (2016) Protecting humanity from future health crises: Report of the High-level Panel on the Global
Response to Health Crises, 70th Session Agenda item no 125,
asp?symbol=A/70/723 (last checked 9 April 2019)
UNDP (2017)Human Development Report: Sierra Leone,
(last checked 9 April 2019)
WHO (2016a)Joint External Evaluation Tool IHR (2005) Monitoring And Evaluation Framework
International Health Regulations, Geneva: World Health Organization,
982F04D4?sequence=1(last checked 9 April 2019)
WHO (2016b)Zika Strategic Response Plan, Geneva: World Health Organization,
iris/bitstream/handle/10665/246091/WHO-ZIKV-SRF-16.3-eng.pdf?sequence=1 (last checked 9 April
WHO (2018)WHO and World Bank Group join forces to strengthen global health security,http://
global-health-security (last checked 9 April 2019)
Wilson, Kumanan, John Brownstein and David Fidler (2010)Strengthening the International Health
Regulations: lessons from the H1N1 pandemic,Health Policy and Planning 25(6): 5059
Witter, Sophie, Justine Namakula, Haja Wurie, Yotamu Chirwa, Sovanarith So, Sreytouch Vong,
Bandeth Ros, Stephen Buzuzi and Sally Theobald (2017)The gendered health workforce: mixed
methods analysis from four fragile and post-conict contexts,Health Policy and Planning 32
(suppl_5): v52v62
World Bank (2014)The Economic Impact of the 2014 Ebola Epidemic: Short- and Medium-Term
Estimates for West Africa, Washington, DC: World Bank,
bitstream/handle/10986/20592/9781464804380.pdf?sequence=6 (last checked 9 April 2019)
Yamin, Alicia and Vanessa Boulanger (2013)Embedding sexual and reproductive health and rights in
a transformational development framework: lessons learned from the MDG targets and indicators,
Reproductive Health Matters 21(42): 7485
... In Colombia, most prostate cancer diagnoses are based on symptoms; thus, staying home during confinement with a different social role and free time compared to women 22 , may have increased men's willingness to seek medical advice. The different ways women and men experience outbreaks and respond to emergencies have been previously noted [23][24][25] , and some COVID-19 studies in LMIC show that women have been less likely to seek health care 26 ; yet, data from high-income countries show no sex-related differences in pathological cancer diagnosis during the pandemic 27 . ...
Full-text available
Aim: We analyze the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on oncology service demand in a middle-income country with universal health coverage. Methods: We collected data from January 1st-2017, to December 31th-2021 at a reference center in Bogotá-Colombia regarding first-time consultations of cross-cutting services (clinical oncology, hematology, palliative care, radiation oncology); specialized multidisciplinary units (breast, prostate, lung, stomach); inpatient and outpatient systemic therapy; radiotherapy; oncology surgery; and bone marrow transplant. In addition, a descriptive time series analysis was performed, estimating monthly percent change and endemic channels. Results: Starting the confinement (April 2020), a general decrease in service demand was observed (R: -14.9% to -90.0%), with an additional but lower reduction in August 2020 coinciding with the first pandemic wave (R: -11.3% to -70.0%). Follow-up visits and ambulatory treatment showed no consistent reductions. New patients’ consultations for cross-cutting services had a speedy recovery (1 month), but clinical oncology, specialized units, and in-hospital treatment resumed more slowly. Only breast and stomach cancer showed a sustained reduction in early-stage disease. Women and older patients had a more significant reduction in service demand. Conclusion: Despite no changes in service supply, the confinement induced a significant reduction in service demand. Variations by cancer type, service type, and population demographics deserve careful consideration for a suitable response to the emergency. The speedy recovery and the absence of a significant decrease during subsequent waves of the pandemic suggest patient resiliency and a lower impact than expected in middle-income settings in the presence of universal health insurance.
... From a social and cultural point of view, the pandemic has only highlighted existing cracks. Social norms and structures dictating that women assume caregiving roles are augmented during pandemics [82]. During this period because of the closure of schools, women have suffered a heavy psychological burden, not being able to rely on the help of grandparents in caring for their children due to social restrictions. ...
Full-text available
The COVID-19 pandemic and its social restrictions have affected mental health globally. This systematic review aims to analyze the psychological responses of the general population and its related sociodemographic risk factors, excluding the most vulnerable groups (e.g., healthcare workers, COVID-19 patients and survivors, pregnant women, people with chronic diseases or preexisting psychiatric disorders). A reproducible search from June 2020 to February 2021 was conducted on PubMed and Google Scholar, following the PRISMA guidelines. Papers that (1) considered the most at-risk populations, (2) did not report sociodemographic data, and (3) did not use validated scales were excluded from our analysis. Non-English papers and review articles were also excluded. Of 1116 papers identified, 25 were included for this review ( n = 162,465). The main risk factors associated with the emergence of depression, anxiety, sleep disorders, post-traumatic stress disorder, and obsessive compulsive disorder were: female gender, younger and later age, high level of education, Latino origin, free marital status, living quarantine in a house with no outdoor, negative coping strategies, close proximity to positive cases, high concern about contracting COVID-19 and living in a most affected area. High income, physical activity, resilience, family support, and a high level of knowledge about COVID-19, seems to be protective factors against the onset of psychological symptoms. In a general population, COVID-19 restrictions are linked to risk factors for psychological disorders caused by gender and sociodemographic conditions. In this regard governments should pay more attention to the public’s mental health and its risk and protective factors.
... This means that progress towards achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)particularly SDG5 which seeks to achieve gender equality and to empower all womxn and girlsthat our governments have been reporting on in the past few years, has been greatly affected. Government and institutional responses seem to be paralysed by what Julia Smith (2019) refers to as the 'tyranny of the urgent', characterised by priorisation of medical and economic imperatives over other structural dynamics of the pandemic. In particular, the emerging research and debates have been largely devoid of an intersectional gendered or feminist analysis, leaving the gendered impacts of the pandemic invisible and unaddressed. ...
... A pesar de lo grave de esta situación, en la respuesta de diversos gobiernos a esta problemática ha estado ausente la perspectiva de género, esto porque históricamente ha habido una falta de integración del género en las políticas del desarrollo (Kau er, 2016) y en las pandemias permanece esta omisión (Smith, 2019;Wenham, Smith y Morgan, 2020) y porque en la respuesta a las pandemias puede prevalecer la incapacidad de algunos Estados, de manera que se fortalecen los poderes empresariales que capitalizan el sufrimiento, a través de… la explotación capitalista y la violencia contra las mujeres, las personas queer y trans (Butler, 2020). ...
Full-text available
No es ninguna noticia y hasta parecería innecesario rea rmar que la vida planetaria se ha transformado de manera radical debido a los acontecimientos de los dos últimos años, Chiapas, por supuesto, no ha sido la excepción. Pues ante la situación de la doble pandemia Covid-19 y la violencia de género, recurrí a esta re exión de Foucault: “Si se quiere captar los mecanismos de poder en su complejidad y en detalle, no se puede uno limitar al análisis de los aparatos de Estado” (Foucault, 1979: 119). ¿Cómo estas re exiones ayudan a entender ciertas problemáticas y sus posibles soluciones en nuestro contexto de investigación? A continuación, trataré de responder a estas interrogantes.
By magnifying gender‐ and socioeconomic status‐based inequalities, the COVID‐19 pandemic caused stress and disrupted career progress for professional students. The present work investigated the impact of pandemic‐related stress and prevailing barriers on structurally disadvantaged women preparing for a high‐stakes professional exam. In Study 1, we found that among US law students preparing for the October 2020 California Bar Exam—the professional exam that enables one to become a practicing attorney in California—first‐generation women reported the greatest stress from pandemic‐related burdens and underperformed on the exam relative to others overall, and particularly compared to continuing‐generation women. This underperformance was explained by pandemic‐related stress they contended with most, as well as by structural demands shouldered most by first‐generation test‐takers regardless of gender. Even when controlling for the structural features of caregiving and working while studying, the psychological burdens experienced most by first‐generation women predicted lower exam success. Study 2 investigated the February 2021 California Bar Exam. Consistent with Study 1, first‐generation women test‐takers reported the most pandemic‐related stress, which predicted lower exam performance above and beyond structural barriers to exam success. We offer policy prescriptions to bolster the success of at‐risk groups in the legal profession pipeline, a challenge magnified by the pandemic.
Full-text available
Objective: To measure the knowledge and attitudes of Catalan nursing students regarding lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans and intersex (LGBTI) patients, as well as their perception of specific training in this area, according to their internship modalities, sociodemographic circumstances and academic background during the COVID-19 pandemic. Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, the Spanish Government created the "Health-Aid" internship: a paid alternative to curricular internships. There is extensive evidence that paid work environments perpetuate negative attitudes towards LGBTI patients. Method: Cross-sectional survey aimed at Catalan nursing students. The "Attitudes Towards and Knowledge About Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Intersex Patients" questionnaire was adapted. Descriptive study and backward regression models were constructed. Results: 337 students, mean age 23.80 years (SD: 5.17) participated. 85% women and 54 (16%) completing the Health Aid internship modality. More than 50% did not attend specific training on the care of the LGBTI population. Differences between internship modalities showed higher values in the curricular internship group: attitudes (U = 6526.50, p = 0.031) and training perception (U = 5926.50, p = 0.008). Conclusions: Nursing students' attitudes towards LGBTI patients and their perception of specific training on care for this population were negatively influenced by the paid Health Aid internship during the pandemic. Implications for nursing management: Even under dire circumstances, clinical training must be properly managed to address the specific health needs of vulnerable populations, such as LGTBI patients. Paid internships in emergency scenarios may impede these objectives.
COVID-19 has had many corollary devastations coming from responses to the pandemic in the context of an already-devastated planet. Huge spikes in single-use plastic production and collapsed food systems are two such devastations, and both further harm communities while contaminating and degrading vital ecosystems. I take these examples up as a means of raising questions about how we might do better in the face of pandemics that will be an inevitable part of our future—especially if we proceed as we are now. How might we think about planetary health more holistically, as interrelated social and ecological systems rather than categorical silos, and as involving life beyond humans even in the midst of what appears to be a purely human threat, but is not? Rather than proposing the usual recommendations that work within rather than alter a political economic system responsible for planetary pathologies, I highlight scholars advocating fundamental changes in our thinking and praxis where current global economic, social, and ecological systems are concerned. The ontological and epistemological shifts urged by these authors, I argue, are what will produce the best roadmap toward more just and equitable visions of a healthier planet.KeywordsOne HealthPlasticsFood security Buen vivir Donna Haraway
International news representations of the COVID-19 crisis are particularly salient in shaping public health responses. Therefore, women’s differential experiences are important to highlight in order to develop gender-responsive programming and strategies to improve global health outcomes. Informed by work on feminist political economy, this content analysis investigates how women are discursively framed during the pandemic by analyzing digital reports from three major television news channels (based in China, Qatar, and the United States). The aim is to evaluate the extent to which international media coverage reinforces gender and other power differentials within and across countries and shapes public understanding of the direct and indirect effects of the disease on women. Study findings indicate women’s limited visibility in COVID-19 news and differences in framing across and within sources. The need for international media to give voice to and consider in depth the way structurally reproduced inequalities facilitate public health crises as well as the disparate effects on the health of intersecting groups including but not limited to women, people of color, gender minorities, and those located in lower income countries is reinforced in this work.
In Brazil, abortion is only allowed in cases of rape, serious risk to a woman's life or fetal anecephaly. Legal abortion services cover less than 4% of the Brazilian territory and only 1,800 procedures are performed, in average, per year. During the COVID‐19 pandemic, almost half of the already few Brazilian abortion clinics shut down and women had to travel even longer distances, reaching abortion services at later gestational ages. In this paper, we describe three bottom‐up advocacy strategies that emerged from difficulties deepened during the COVID‐19 pandemic at a single abortion service in Brazil, amidst anti‐gender policies from the federal government. Telemedicine abortion, outpatient surgical abortion and the provision of abortion after 20 weeks' gestation are important strategies that may reduce inequalities that impact the most vulnerable populations, such as black and indigenous women, children, adolescents and women experiencing domestic violence.
Full-text available
The first confirmed case of Zika virus infection in the Americas was reported in Northeast Brazil in May 2015, although phylogenetic studies indicate virus introduction as early as 2013. Zika rapidly spread across Brazil and to more than 50 other countries and territories on the American continent. The Aedes aegypti mosquito is thought to be the principal vector responsible for the widespread transmission of the virus. However, sexual transmission has also been reported. The explosively emerging epidemic has had diverse impacts on population health, coinciding with cases of Guillain–Barré Syndrome and an unexpected epidemic of newborns with microcephaly and other neurological impairments. This led to Brazil declaring a national public health emergency in November 2015, followed by a similar decision by the World Health Organization three months later. While dengue virus serotypes took several decades to spread across Brazil, the Zika virus epidemic diffused within months, extending beyond the area of permanent dengue transmission, which is bound by a climatic barrier in the south and low population density areas in the north. This rapid spread was probably due to a combination of factors, including a massive susceptible population, climatic conditions conducive for the mosquito vector, alternative non-vector transmission, and a highly mobile population. The epidemic has since subsided, but many unanswered questions remain. In this article, we provide an overview of the discovery of Zika virus in Brazil, including its emergence and spread, epidemiological surveillance, vector and non-vector transmission routes, clinical complications, and socio-economic impacts. We discuss gaps in the knowledge and the challenges ahead to anticipate, prevent, and control emerging and re-emerging epidemics of arboviruses in Brazil and worldwide.
Full-text available
It is well known that the health workforce composition is influenced by gender relations. However, little research has been done which examines the experiences of health workers through a gender lens, especially in fragile and post-conflict states. In these contexts, there may not only be opportunities to (re)shape occupational norms and responsibilities in the light of challenges in the health workforce, but also threats that put pressure on resources and undermine gender balance, diversity and gender responsive human resources for health (HRH). We present mixed method research on HRH in four fragile and post-conflict contexts (Sierra Leone, Zimbabwe, northern Uganda and Cambodia) with different histories to understand how gender influences the health workforce. We apply a gender analysis framework to explore access to resources, occupations, values, decision-making and power. We draw largely on life histories with male and female health workers to explore their lived experiences, but complement the analysis with evidence from surveys, document reviews, key informant interviews, human resource data and stakeholder mapping. Our findings shed light on patterns of employment: in all contexts women predominate in nursing and midwifery cadres, are under-represented in management positions and are clustered in lower paying positions. Gendered power relations shaped by caring responsibilities at the household level, affect attitudes to rural deployment and women in all contexts face challenges in accessing both pre-and in-service training. Coping strategies within conflict emerged as a key theme, with experiences here shaped by gender, poverty and household structure. Most HRH regulatory frameworks did not sufficiently address gender concerns. Unless these are pro-actively addressed post-crisis, health workforces will remain too few, poorly distributed and unable to meet the health needs of vulnerable populations. Practical steps need to be taken to identify gender barriers proactively and engage staff and communities on best approaches for change.
Full-text available
Study question: Has there been any influence of the Zika virus (ZIKV) outbreak on the sales of contraceptive methods in Brazil? Summary answer: Contraceptive sales in the 24 months of evaluation showed little variation and no significant change has been observed since the ZIKV outbreak. What is known already: Transmission of ZIKV is primarily by Aedes aegypti mosquitoes; however, sexual transmission has also been described. The association of several birth defects and the ZIKV infection during pregnancy has been established, and it was estimated in Bahia, Brazil that the infection rate could range from 10% to 80%. The World Health Organisation (WHO) declared the cluster of microcephaly cases and other neurological disorders a health emergency on 1 February 2016. The Brazilian government also made recommendations for women who were planning to become pregnant and who reside in ZIKV-affected areas to reconsider or postpone pregnancy. Study design, size, duration: The objective of this study was to assess the sales of contraceptive methods in Brazil, tracking it from before and through the ZIKV outbreak. We obtained information from all pharmaceutical companies based in Brazil and from the manufacturers of long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs), including the copper-intrauterine device (IUD), the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) and implants, about contraceptives sales in the public and private sectors between September 2014 and August 2016. Participants/materials, setting, methods: We analyzed the data for: (i) oral contraceptives, i.e. combined oral contraceptives (COC) and progestin-only pills (POP), and vaginal and transdermal contraceptives, (ii) injectable contraceptives, i.e. once-a-month and depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate, (iii) LARCs and (iv) emergency contraceptive (EC) pills. Main results and the role of chance: Monthly sales of COC, POP, patches and vaginal rings represent the major sales segment of the market, i.e. 12.7-13.8 million cycles/units per month (90%). The second largest group of sales was injectables, representing 0.8-1.5 million ampoules per month (9.5%). Following this, are LARC methods with sales of 37 000-41 000 devices per month (0.5%). It is important to note that although the peak months of sales were different for each group of contraceptives, there were no significant differences overall between the months of observation. The EC pill sales were between 1.0 million and 1.3 million of pills per month. Limitations, reasons for caution: Although the use of contraceptive methods was already high and no change was noted, the ZIKV outbreak may have changed the pregnancy intentions of Brazilian women. Consequently, the number of women planning pregnancy may be lower than that recorded. The contraceptive sales figures did not include condoms. Since condoms might not only prevent pregnancies, but also sexual transmission of ZIKV, this lack of information is a limitation. Wider implications of the findings: The results from this assessment showed that the sales of contraceptives presented little variation during the ZIKV outbreak in Brazil. Furthermore, it is possible that access to LARC methods was limited. Although we did not investigate the reason for low LARC uptake, we suspect that it is due to lack of availability of LARC in the public sector, the high cost of the methods and the incomplete insurance coverage on contraception for women. Projections estimate millions of additional cases of ZIKV transmission. Thus, a coordinated response is needed to ensure access to a wide range of contraceptive methods for women during the ZIKV outbreak. In conclusion, this assessment of contraceptive sales in Brazil identifies challenges in contraceptive access, especially for LARC methods, and represents an alternative source of data to help us understand the trends in demand for contraception in ZIKV-affected areas. Study funding/competing interests: This study received partial financial support from Fundação de Apoio à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) award # 2015/20504-9 and from an anonymous donor. The funding sources did not play a role in the study design, in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data, in the writing of the report, or in the decision to submit the article for publication. The authors declare no conflict of interest associated with this study. Trial registration number: N/A.
Full-text available
Civil society organizations (CSOs) are recognized as playing an exceptional role in the global AIDS response. However, there is little detailed research to date on how they contribute to specific governance functions. This article uses Haas' framework on global governance functions to map CSO's participation in the monitoring of global commitments to the AIDS response by institutions and states. Drawing on key informant interviews and primary documents, it focuses specifically on CSO participation in Global AIDS Response Progress Reporting and in Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria processes. It argues that the AIDS response is unique within global health governance, in that CSOs fulfill both formal and informal monitoring functions, and considers the strengths and weaknesses of these contributions. It concludes that future global health governance arrangements should include provisions and resources for monitoring by CSOs because their participation creates more inclusive global health governance and contribute to strengthening commitments to human rights.
Full-text available
Gender-the socially constructed roles, behaviours, activities and attributes that a given society considers appropriate for males, females and other genders-affects how people live, work and relate to each other at all levels, including in relation to the health system. Health systems research (HSR) aims to inform more strategic, effective and equitable health systems interventions, programs and policies; and the inclusion of gender analysis into HSR is a core part of that endeavour. We outline what gender analysis is and how gender analysis can be incorporated into HSR content, process and outcomes Starting with HSR content, i.e. the substantive focus of HSR, we recommend exploring whether and how gender power relations affect females and males in health systems through the use of sex disaggregated data, gender frameworks and questions. Sex disaggregation flags female-male differences or similarities that warrant further analysis; and further analysis is guided by gender frameworks and questions to understand how gender power relations are constituted and negotiated in health systems. Critical aspects of understanding gender power relations include examining who has what (access to resources); who does what (the division of labour and everyday practices); how values are defined (social norms) and who decides (rules and decision-making). Secondly, we examine gender in HSR process by reflecting on how the research process itself is imbued with power relations. We focus on data collection and analysis by reviewing who participates as respondents; when data is collected and where; who is present; who collects data and who analyses data. Thirdly, we consider gender and HSR outcomes by considering who is empowered and disempowered as a result of HSR, including the extent to which HSR outcomes progressively transform gender power relations in health systems, or at least do not further exacerbate them.
This paper explores the intended and unintended consequences of the selection of MDG 5 as a global goal, together with its respective targets and indicators, and places what happened to MDG 5, and sexual and reproductive health and rights more broadly, into the context of the development model that was encoded in the MDGs. Over the last decade, as the MDGs increasingly took centre stage in development and their use evolved, they were inappropriately converted from global goals into national planning targets. This conversion was particularly detrimental in the case of MDG 5. It not only created a narrowing in terms of policies and programming, but also had an enormous impact on the discourse of development itself, reshaping the field in terms of the organization and dissemination of knowledge, and underscoring that the process of setting targets and indicators is far from neutral but encodes normative values. Looking forward, it is not adequate to propose an MDG+ framework based on the same structure. Sexual and reproductive health and rights must be placed back into the global discourse, using development to empower women and marginalized populations, and to address structural inequalities that are fundamental to sustained social change. The new development framework should include a strong narrative of social transformation in which fit-for-purpose targets and indicators play a role, but do not overtake or restrict the broader aims of advancing social, political, and gender justice. Résumé Cet article examine les conséquences prévues ou non du choix de l’OMD 5 comme objectif mondial, conjointement avec ses cibles et indicateurs respectifs, et place l’évolution de l’OMD 5, et plus largement de la santé et des droits sexuels et génésiques, dans le contexte du modèle de développement qui a été encodé dans les OMD. Ces dix dernières années, à mesure que les OMD occupaient une place de plus en plus centrale dans le développement et que leur utilisation évoluait, il est regrettable qu’ils aient cessé d’être des objectifs mondiaux pour devenir des cibles de la planification nationale. Cette transformation a été particulièrement néfaste dans le cas de l’OMD 5. Elle a non seulement restreint les politiques et la programmation, mais a eu d’importantes répercussions sur le discours du développement lui-même : elle a transformé ce domaine du point de vue de l’organisation et de la diffusion des connaissances, et a montré que la définition des cibles et des indicateurs n’est pas neutre et qu’elle véhicule des valeurs normatives. S’agissant de l’avenir, il n’est pas judicieux de proposer un cadre des OMD+ reposant sur la même structure. La santé et les droits sexuels et génésiques doivent être replacés dans le discours mondial, utilisant le développement pour autonomiser les femmes et les populations marginalisées, et corriger les inégalités structurelles, ce qui est fondamental pour un changement social durable. Le nouveau cadre de développement devrait inclure une solide description de la transformation sociale dans laquelle des cibles et des indicateurs adéquats jouent un rôle, mais sans dépasser ni circonscrire les buts plus larges du progrès de la justice sociale et politique et de l’égalité des sexes. Resumen En este artículo se examinan las consecuencias deseadas y no deseadas de la selección del ODM 5 como meta mundial, así como sus respectivas metas e indicadores, y se pone en el contexto del modelo de desarrollo codificado en los ODM lo que sucedió con el ODM 5 y con la salud y los derechos sexuales y reproductivos en general. En la última década, a medida que los ODM cobraron cada vez más importancia en desarrollo y su uso evolucionó, inapropiadamente pasaron de ser metas mundiales a ser metas nacionales de planificación. Esta conversión fue perjudicial en el caso del ODM 5 en particular. No solo creó un estrechamiento con relación a las políticas y los programas, sino que también tuvo un gran impacto en el discurso del desarrollo en sí, ya que reestructuró el campo en términos de la organización y difusión de conocimientos y recalcó que el proceso de establecer metas e indicadores dista mucho de ser neutral pero codifica valores normativos. Con miras hacia el futuro, no es adecuado proponer un marco de ODM+ basado en la misma estructura. La salud y los derechos sexuales y reproductivos deben incluirse nuevamente en el discurso mundial, utilizando el desarrollo para empoderar a las mujeres y a las poblaciones marginadas, así como para abordar las desigualdades estructurales que son fundamentales para el cambio social sostenido. El nuevo marco de desarrollo debe incluir una narrativa influyente sobre la transformación social en la cual las metas y los indicadores adaptados al propósito desempeñen un papel, pero no superen ni limiten los objetivos generales de promover la justicia social, política y de género.
Objective: to explore and describe midwives' experiences of caring for pregnant women admitted to Ebola centres in Sierra Leone. Design: a qualitative interview study with an exploratory and descriptive approach. Setting: individual semi-structured interviews with midwives who provided care for pregnant woman in eight different Ebola centres in Sierra Leone during the Ebola outbreak in 2014-16. Participants: 11 midwives, Sierra Leoneans and expatriates, who worked for three different humanitarian organisations in Sierra Leone during the Ebola outbreak in 2014-2016. Findings: three themes emerged as a result of the analysis. The first theme described how personal and public fears of Ebola infection affected the midwives' professional and personal lives. Secondly, motivation and support influenced the midwives' ability to cope with challenging midwifery care and finally competency, creativity and courage was described as essential for improving clinical guidelines and learn for the future. Key conclusions and implications for practice: midwives who worked in Ebola centres in Sierra Leone have a wide range of experiences in caring for pregnant women affected by Ebola. Their views should therefore be sought and considered when new guidelines are being developed on how best to provide care for pregnant women during an outbreak of Ebola virus disease, or any comparable infectious disease. Balanced information, sufficient training, adequate equipment and access to support by colleagues and peers would assist the midwives in coping with the challenges they face.
Globally gender remains a key factor in differing health outcomes for men and women. This article analyses the particular relevance of gender for debates about global health and the role for international human rights law in supporting improved health outcomes during public health emergencies. Looking specifically at the recent Ebola and Zika outbreaks, what we find particularly troubling in both cases is the paucity of engagement with human rights language and the diverse backgrounds of women in these locations of crisis, when women-specific advice was being issued. We find the lessons that should have been learnt from the Ebola experience have not been applied in the Zika outbreak and there remains a disconnect between the international public health advice being issued and the experience of pervasive structural gender inequalities among those experiencing the crises. In both cases we find that responses at the outbreak of the crisis presume that women have economic, social or regulatory options to exercise the autonomy contained in international advice. The problem in the case of both Ebola and Zika has been that leaving structural gender inequalities out of the crisis response has further compounded those inequalities. The article argues for a contextual human rights analysis that takes into account gender as a social and economic determinant of health.
The Zika pandemic provides biomedical scientists, clinicians, public health advocates, and governments a unique opportunity to advance reproductive justice by addressing the paradoxes outlined in this essay. The circumstances in which pregnancies occur are morally relevant to women’s reproductive life decisions, to the provision of reproductive health care, and to the development of reproductive health policy. Whether the Zika pandemic might foster context-driven reproductive pandemic planning and response is yet to be determined. Maintaining the status quo will surely increase a range of global health disparities and further stratify reproduction, producing predictable and preventable outcomes in which some people receive the necessary care and resources to achieve family building while others are neglected. Women and men should be able to count on biomedical researchers to answer the questions that need answering without undue influence from political agendas. Women should be able to continue pregnancies and count on public health assistance and help for children with Zika-related disabilities, or prevent or end a Zika-affected pregnancy. Pandemic responses that don’t further these ends are morally unacceptable.
The nature of human security is changing globally: Interstate conflict and even intrastate conflict may be diminishing worldwide, yet threats to individuals and communities persist. Large-scale violence by formal and informal armed forces intersects with interpersonal and domestic forms of violence in mutually reinforcing ways. Gender, Violence, and Human Security takes a critical look at notions of human security and violence through a feminist lens, drawing on both theoretical perspectives and empirical examinations through case studies from a variety of contexts around the globe. This fascinating volume goes beyond existing feminist international relations engagements with security studies to identify not only limitations of the human security approach, but also possible synergies between feminist and human security approaches. Noted scholars Aili Mari Tripp, Myra Marx Ferree, and Christina Ewig, along with their distinguished group of contributors, analyze specific case studies from around the globe, ranging from post-conflict security in Croatia to the relationship between state policy and gender-based crime in the United States. Shifting the focus of the term “human security” from its defensive emphasis to a more proactive notion of peace, the book ultimately calls for addressing the structural issues that give rise to violence. A hard-hitting critique of the ways in which global inequalities are often overlooked by human security theorists, Gender, Violence, and Human Security presents a much-needed intervention into the study of power relations throughout the world.