ArticlePDF Available

Elements of the Healthy Work Environment Associated with Lower Primary Care Nurse Burnout

Authors:

Abstract

Background: Little is known about the relationship between primary care nurses' work environment and burnout, particularly in settings where patient-centered medical homes (PCMH) have been implemented. Purpose: To investigate the relationship between PCMH nurses' work environment and burnout. Methods: Multivariable analyses were performed using two waves of survey data from PCMH registered nurses (RNs; n = 170) and PCMH licensed vocational nurses (LVNs; n = 181) in 23 primary care clinics. Findings: True collaboration was inversely associated with PCMH RN burnout (b = -2.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -4.29, -0.08, p < .01). Meaningful recognition was inversely associated with PCMH LVN burnout (b = -5.1, 95% CI = -8.36, -1.82, p < .01). In models with all nurses, RN (vs. LVN) position was associated with higher levels of burnout (b = 6.2, 95% CI = 2.47, 9.84, p < .01). Discussion: This study highlights the important role of the work environment in reducing PCMH nurse burnout. Strategies to foster team collaboration and meaningful recognition should be investigated to reduce PCMH nurse burnout.
Elements of the healthy work environment
associated with lower primary care nurse burnout
Linda Y. Kim, PhD, MSN, RN, PHN
a,b,
*, Danielle E. Rose, PhD, MPH
b
,
David A. Ganz, MD, PhD, MPH
b,c,d
, Karleen F. Giannitrapani, PhD, MPH
e,f
,
Elizabeth M. Yano, PhD, MSPH
b,g
, Lisa V. Rubenstein, MD, MSPH
d,g,h
,
Susan E. Stockdale, PhD, MA
b,i
a
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
b
VA HSR&D Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy (CSHIIP), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System,
Los Angeles, CA
c
Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, UCLA Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
d
RAND Health, Santa Monica, CA
e
VA HSR&D Center for Innovation to Implementation (Ci2i), VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA
f
Department of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA
g
Department of Health Policy and Management, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA
h
Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, UCLA Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
i
Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
ABSTRACT
Background: Little is known about the relationship between primary care nurses’
work environment and burnout, particularly in settings where patient-centered
medical homes (PCMH) have been implemented.
Purpose: To investigate the relationship between PCMH nurses’ work environment
and burnout.
Methods: Multivariable analyses were performed using two waves of survey data
from PCMH registered nurses (RNs; n= 170) and PCMH licensed vocational nurses
(LVNs; n= 181) in 23 primary care clinics.
Findings: True collaboration was inversely associated with PCMH RN burnout
(b=2.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.29, 0.08, p<.01). Meaningful recog-
nition was inversely associated with PCMH LVN burnout (b=5.1, 95%
CI = 8.36, 1.82, p<.01). In models with all nurses, RN (vs. LVN) position was
associated with higher levels of burnout (b= 6.2, 95% CI = 2.47, 9.84, p<.01).
Discussion: This study highlights the important role of the work environment in
reducing PCMH nurse burnout. Strategies to foster team collaboration and
meaningful recognition should be investigated to reduce PCMH nurse burnout.
Cite this article: Kim, L.Y., Rose, D.E., Ganz, D.A., Giannitrapani, K.F., Yano, E.M., Rubenstein, L.V., & Stock-
dale, S.E. (2020, January/February). Elements of the healthy work environment associated with lower pri-
mary care nurse burnout. Nurs Outlook, 68(1), 1425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2019.06.018.
ARTICLE INFO
Article history:
Received 6 December 2018
Received in revised form
26 May 2019
Accepted 21 June 2019
Available online June 27, 2019
Keywords:
Healthy work environment
Interprofessional collaboration
Nurse burnout
Patient-centered medical home
Primary care nurses
Conflicts of interest: No conflicts of interest have been declared by the authors.
*Corresponding author: Linda Kim, Cedars Sinai, Nursing Research Department, 8711 W. 3rd Street, Los Angeles, CA 90048.
E-mail address: linyskim@ucla.edu (L.Y. Kim).
0029-6554/$ -see front matter Published by Elsevier Inc.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2019.06.018
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com
Nurs Outlook 68 (2020) 1425 www.nursingoutlook.org
Introduction
Work stress and burnout are significant concerns in
nursing, as they not only affect individual nurses per-
sonally and professionally, but also the organizations in
which they are employed and the patients they care for
(Jennings, 2008). Nurse burnout has been linked to
lower quality of care, poorer patient safety and health
outcomes, and lower patient satisfaction (Cimiotti,
Aiken, Sloane, & Wu, 2012; McHugh, Kutney-Lee,
Cimiotti, Sloane, & Aiken, 2011; Poghosyan, Clark, Fin-
layson, & Aiken, 2010). Consequently, Bodenheimer
and Sinsky (2014) suggested that the Triple Aim—
national goals to optimize population health by (1)
enhancing patient experience, (2) improving population
health, and (3) reducing costs— expanded to the Qua-
druple Aim, adding the fourth goal of improving the
work life of health care providers, including nurses.
The American Association of Critical-Care Nurses
Healthy Work Environment (AACN HWE) Standards,
first issued in 2005 (Table 1), increased national and
international attention to the work environment’s
impact on nurse retention, team effectiveness, nurse
and patient outcomes, and burnout, particularly in
acute care settings (American Association of Critical-
Care Nurses, 2016). However, attention to these stand-
ards applied in other settings including ambulatory
care settings is also much needed, especially since the
various service/departments in which nurses work,
tasks performed, and the role played by the health care
staff as well as the type of patients treated, may impact
levels of nurse burnout (Monsalve-Reyes et al., 2018).
In primary care settings, nurses’ role differs from
that of acute care nurses, especially following imple-
mentation of patient-centered medical homes
(PCMH)—a team-based model of patient care delivery
that encompasses the core functions of primary health
care. Within the PCMH model, responsibility for
patients is shared by all team members in the PCMH,
in contrast to the traditional physician-centric
approach. The PCMH model also emphasizes continu-
ity and long-term relationships with patients, in con-
trast to acute care settings that focus on fixing what
“broke” and sending the patient back to primary care.
As such, primary care nurses practicing within a
PCMH model often share responsibilities for patient
care activities with other members of the interprofes-
sional team consisting of the primary care provider
and other health care professionals. They must also
undertake expanded roles including chronic illness
management, telephone triage, and coordination of
longitudinal and comprehensive patient care delivery
by initiating and informing referrals to other health
care professionals and participating in team-based
planning (Norful, Martsolf, de Jacq, & Paghosyan, 2017;
Smolowitz et al., 2015). With the increasing number of
primary care practices adopting the PCMH model of
care delivery, a better understanding of the relation-
ship between the PCMH practice environment and var-
ious burnout experienced by primary care nurses
practicing in these settings is urgently needed.
Much is already known about the relationship
between various practice environment factors on
nursing burnout in acute care settings (Dall’ora, Grif-
fits, Ball, Simon, & Aiken, 2015; Demir, Ulusoy, & Ulu-
soy 2003; Laschinger, Grau, Finegan, & Wilk, 2010;
McHugh & Ma, 2014). For instance, in acute care set-
tings, lower levels of nurse staffing, working night
shift, or shifts that last 12 hours or longer were linked
to increased nurse burnout (Dall’ora et al., 2015;
McHugh & Ma, 2014). Furthermore, higher levels of
burnout were reported by nurses who experienced
poor interprofessional relationships, including hori-
zontal/lateral violence and bullying by physicians as
well as other members of the nursing team (Demir
et al., 2003; Laschinger et al., 2010). On the other hand,
work environment factors including sufficient staffing,
authentic leadership that provides recognition and
support, participatory decision-making, and effective
nursephysician relationships, all promoted through
workplace empowerment, were associated with lower
levels of nurse burnout (Laschinger, Finegan, & Wilk,
2011; Laschinger & Leiter, 2006; Leiter & Laschinger,
2006). These mitigating factors (e.g., true collaboration,
skilled communication, effective decision-making,
authentic leadership, meaningful recognition, and
appropriate staffing) are essentially the components of
the HWE endorsed by the AACN.
While several studies have examined various factors
associated with burnout in primary care, little is known
about the impact of the workplace environment on pri-
mary care nurse burnout, particularly those practicing
in PCMH settings (Helfrich et al., 2014; Kim et al., 2018;
Table 1 AACN HWE Standards (AACN, 2016)
Skilled communication Nurses must be as proficient in communication as they are in clinical skills
True collaboration Nurses must be relentless in pursuing and fostering true collaboration
Effective decision-making Nurses must be valued and committed partners in making policy, directing and evaluating
clinical care, and leading organizational operations
Appropriate staffing Staffing must ensure an effective match between patients’ needs and nurses’ competencies
Meaningful recognition Nurses must be recognized and must recognize others for the value each brings to the work
of the organization
Authentic leadership Nurse leaders must fully embrace the imperative of a healthy work environment, authenti-
cally live it, and engage others in its achievement
Note. AACN HWE, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses Healthy Work Environment.
Nurs Outlook 68 (2020) 1425 15
Lewis et al., 2012; Meredith et al., 2015, 2018; Nelson
et al., 2014; Reid et al., 2010). In one PCMH evaluation
study examining primary care tasks associated with
health care provider burnout, nurses were not included
in the study sample (Kim et al., 2018). In other studies
evaluating the impact of PCMH elements on health care
provider burnout, nurses were grouped with other
health care providers (Lewis et al., 2012; Meredith et al.,
2015, 2018), the proportion of nurses that was actually
included in the study sample is unclear (Reid et al.,
2010), and/or the studies do not provide a clear descrip-
tion of which PCMH practice environment elements
specifically impact primary care nurses (Helfrich et al.,
2014). The purpose of this study, therefore, is to investi-
gate the relationship between primary care nurses’
practice environment, following PCMH implementa-
tion, and their levels of burnout.
Methods
Setting and Sample
In 2010, the Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
adopted and implemented Patient-Aligned Care Teams
(PACT), a PCMH model of patient care delivery, in all pri-
mary care settings. Similar to other PCMH models,
PACT “teamlets” are comprised of a primary care pro-
vider such asa physician, nurse practitioner, or a physi-
cian assistant, and three supporting team members
including a registered nurse (RN) care manager, a
licensed vocational nurse (LVN), and a medical assis-
tant or a clerical staff member (Kim et al., 2018; U.S.
Department of Veterans Affairs, 2014). Multiple team-
lets are supported by ancillary staff from other disci-
plines, such as pharmacists, nutritionists/dieticians,
and social workers as well as mental health professio-
nals (e.g., psychiatrists, psychologists) who all work
together, with the ultimate goal of providing compre-
hensive, patient-centered, coordinated, high quality,
safe, and accessible care to patients and their caregivers
(Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, n.d.).
The sample for this study included PACT nurses prac-
ticing in 23 practices within five health care systems
across Southern California and Nevada (Veterans Inte-
grated Service Network or VISN 22), who were included
in the larger evaluation study of the VA’s implementa-
tion of PACT. Analytic sample for this study included
170 PACT RNs and 181 PACT LVNs.
Data Collection
Data for this study come from two waves of surveys
(November 2011March 2012 and August 2013January
2014). The surveys were conducted by the RAND Corpo-
ration on behalf of the VHA, described in more detail
elsewhere (Meredith et al., 2015), and included approxi-
mately 130 items related to leadership involvement,
team decision-making, collaboration with members of
the team, and burnout. RN response rates for waves 1
and 2 were 81% and 32%, respectively; LVN response
rates were 67% and 33%, respectively. Both the VHA
and RAND Institutional Review Boards approved the
original study protocol.
Study Measures
Nurse burnout was measured using the emotional
exhaustion subscale (Appendix A) of the Maslach
Burnout Inventory (Maslach, Jackson, Leiter, Schaufeli,
& Schwab, 1996). Some scholars have argued that emo-
tional exhaustion is the first domain that manifests as
part of burnout and that variables such as job
demands are more strongly associated with emotional
exhaustion (Brenninkmeijer & VanYperen, 2003; Mas-
lach, Schaufeli, & Leiter, 2001; Meredith et al., 2015).
The nine items included statements such as “I feel
burned out from my work.” Response options for each
of the nine items ranged from “never” (0) to “every
day” (6), with a total score ranging from 0 to 54. This
scale was found to have high internal consistency
(a= 0.92) among nurses in this sample. The measure
was used as a continuous variable in the bivariate and
multivariable analysis to assess associations with
other variables. To facilitate interpretation and discus-
sion of the burnout scores, the responses were catego-
rized into three levels of burnout as used in previous
studies (Doulougeri, Georganta, & Montgomery, 2016):
low (016), medium (1726), and high (2754).
Although the AACN’s HWE framework was initially
created for the critical care settings, a recent study
by Connor et al. (2018) validatestheuseoftheAACN
HWE Assessment Tool, across multiple health care
settings. The measures of the first five constructs of
the HWE were included in this study as described
below. The sixth construct, adequate staffing, was
not measured in our surveys. Response options for
each item ranged from “strongly disagree” (1) to
“strongly agree” (5). Survey items corresponding
with the HWE constructs were recategorized as
0 = “disagree” (response options 13) and 1 = “agree”
(response options 45) to facilitate interpretation
and discussion. A detailed description of the AACN’s
HWE constructs and definitions with corresponding
survey items is provided in Table 2, along with the
Cronbach’s alpha for the measures used in analyses.
Table 2 also shows the hypothesized relationships
between the HWE constructs and burnout.
In addition to HWE factors, the relationship between
primary care nurse burnout and nurse characteristics
was explored. Nurse characteristics included nurse type
(RN or LVN), age, gender, race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic
white vs. Asian, black, Latino/a, other), and tenure (num-
ber of years at this clinic). The relationship between pri-
mary care nurse burnout and clinic type (e.g., hospital-
based clinic, large community-based outpatient clinic
[CBOC] that services 8,000 or more primary care patients,
or small CBOC that services less than 8,000 primary care
patients CBOC), was also explored.
16 Nurs Outlook 68 (2020) 1425
Table 2 AACN HWE Constructs and Corresponding Veterans Assessment and Improvement Laboratory (VAIL) Survey Items
AACN’s HWE Constructs and
Definitions (AACN, 2016)
VAIL Survey Items Cronbach’s Alpha for
VAIL Survey Items
Hypothesized Relationship with Burnout
True collaboration: Nurses must be
relentless in pursuing and fostering
true collaboration.
1. Overall, I am satisfied with how my teamlet
members work together.*
a= 0.81 Total collaboration has an inverse relationship
to burnout; that is, an increase in total collab-
oration score is associated with lower level of
burnout.
Process in which unique knowl-
edge and abilities of each profes-
sional are respected to achieve
optimal, safe, and quality care for
patients. Skilled communication,
trust, knowledge, shared respon-
sibility, mutual respect, opti-
mism, and coordination are
integral to successful
collaboration.
2. In this clinic, when I have a problem that
involves a coworker from a different clinical or
administrative discipline, I can access help to
resolve the problem.*
3. In this clinic, coworkers from different clinical
or administrative backgrounds frequently
interact to solve quality of care problems.*
4. Our staff and clinicians have constructive work
relationships. (SOAPC)
y
5. The staff and clinicians in this clinic operate as
real teams. (SOAPC)
y
Total true collaboration score ranged from 0 to 5.
Skilled communication: Nurses
must be as proficient in communica-
tion skills as they are in clinical skills.
1. In this clinic, it is easy to speak up about what
is on your mind. (LOS)
y
a= 0.87 Skilled communication has an inverse relation-
ship to burnout; that is, an increase in skilled
communication score is associated with lower
level of burnout.
Frequent, respectful interaction,
and two-way dialogue in which
nurses speak with knowledge and
authority related to patient care
2. People in this clinic are usually comfortable
talking about problems. (SOAPC)
y
3. People in this clinic are eager to share informa-
tion about problems and disagreements. (LOS)
y
4. When there is a conflict in this clinic, we usu-
ally talk it out and resolve the problem success.
(SOAPC)
y
Total skilled communication score ranged from 0 to 4.
Effective decision-making: Nurses
must be valued and committed part-
ners in making policy, directing and
evaluating clinical care, and leading
organizational operations.
1. Staff and clinicians are involved in developing
plans for improving quality. (SOAPC)
y
a= 0.80 Effective decision-making has an inverse rela-
tionship to burnout; that is, an increase in
effective decision-making score is associated
with lower level of burnout.
Nurse involvement and full part-
nership with physicians and
(continued on next page)
Nurs Outlook 68 (2020) 1425 17
Table 2 – (Continued)
AACN’s HWE Constructs and
Definitions (AACN, 2016)
VAIL Survey Items Cronbach’s Alpha for
VAIL Survey Items
Hypothesized Relationship with Burnout
other health care professionals in
decisions that impact patient
care, including policy making,
directing and evaluating clinical
care, and leading organizational
operations.
2. This clinic encourages staff and clinicians’
input for making changes and improvements.
(SOAPC)
y
3. All of the staff and clinicians participate in
important decisions about clinical operations.
(SOAPC)
y
Total effective decision-making score ranged from 0 to 3.
Authentic leadership: Leaders must
fully embrace the imperative of a
healthy work environment, authenti-
cally live it and engage others in its
achievement.
1. Provides measurable objectives for implement-
ing the strategy and vision within our clinic.
(LN)
y
a= 0.85 Authentic leadership has an inverse relation-
ship to burnout; that is, an increase in skilled
communication score is associated with lower
level of burnout.
Leaders are skilled communicators,
team builders, agents for positive
change, role models for collabo-
ration, and committed to service;
and are positioned within organ-
ization’s key operational and gov-
ernance bodies in order to inform
and influence decisions that
affect practice environments and
nursing practice.
2. Is willing to try new clinical protocols. (ORCS)
y
3. Works cooperatively with senior leadership/
clinical management to make appropriate
changes. (ORCS)
y
4. Understands the difficulties and challenges
related to the implementation of patient-cen-
tered medical homes. (ORCS)
y
Total authentic leadership score ranged from 0 to 4.
Meaningful recognition: Nurses
must be recognized and must recog-
nize others for the value each brings
to the work of the organization.
1. Recognizes and rewards progress in imple-
menting change with our clinic. (LN)
y
a= 0.72 Meaningful recognition has an inverse relation-
ship to burnout; that is, an increase in mean-
ingful recognition score is associated with
lower level of burnout.
Recognition (that is of value and
meaningful to the individual
nurse) for their unique contribu-
tion to the organization and com-
mitment to their patients.
2. Encourages and supports changes in clinic pat-
terns to improve patient care. (ORCS)
y
Total meaningful recognition score ranged from 0 to 2.
Not assessed (N/A) in this study. N/A N/A
(continued on next page)
18 Nurs Outlook 68 (2020) 1425
Analysis
Responses from nurses from both waves (wave 1:
n= 220, wave 2: n= 131) were combined in the analyses
of burnout. A small number of nurses participated in
both waves (11 out of 351 observations) and were
included in the results of main analyses shown in the
paper. However, additional sensitivity analyses were
conducted controlling for clustering of responses among
those nurses who participated in both waves. The results
were similar with and without the 11 extra observations.
In addition to the univariate analysis to describe
nurse characteristics, levels of burnout, and nurses’
perceptions of the HWE elements, bivariate analyses
were performed to explore the potential relationship
between independent variables and nurse burnout.
Only the perceived HWE elements and covariates with
statistically significant associations (p.05) to nurse
burnout in the bivariate analysis were included in the
multivariable linear regression analysis.
In the multivariable analysis, separate models were
conducted for each perceived HWE element (models
15) and three models with all the HWE elements
(models 68): model 6 included the combined sample,
model 7 included RNs only, and model 8 included
LVNs only, controlling for respondent-level covariates.
All analyses were performed with Stata 14.0 (Stata
Corp LP, College Station, TX).
Results
Table 3 shows results for level of nurse burnout, per-
ceptions of the HWE, and respondent, clinic and health
care system characteristics. On average, RNs reported
a medium level of burnout (M= 22.1, SD = 14.3) while
LVNs reported a low level of burnout (M= 17.0,
SD = 13.3). Overall, RNs’ perceptions of the HWE were
slightly more favorable than LVNs’ (except perceptions
of authentic leadership); however, the differences
were not statistically significant. LVNs were younger
but had longer years of tenure as compared to RNs.
About one-third of the nurses identified as non-His-
panic white (37%) were female (75%) and were
employed in hospital-based clinics (44%).
Results from the bivariate analysis (Table 4) indi-
cated that nurse reports of each of the HWE elements
was inversely related to nurse burnout (p.05). Nurse
type (RN vs. LVN) was also significantly associated
with nurse burnout (p.05).
Multivariable linear regression analyses (Table 5)indi-
cate that nurse perceptions of each of the five HWE ele-
ments were inversely associated with nurse burnout in
separate models (models 15). When all five elements
of the HWE were entered together in one model (model
6), perceptions of true collaboration (b=1.3, 95% confi-
dence interval [CI] = 2.50, 0.00, p= .05) and perceptions
of meaningful recognition (b=2.8, 95% CI = 5.64,
0.04, p= .05) were inversely associated with levels of
Table 2 – (Continued)
AACN’s HWE Constructs and
Definitions (AACN, 2016)
VAIL Survey Items Cronbach’s Alpha for
VAIL Survey Items
Hypothesized Relationship with Burnout
Appropriate staffing: Staffing must
ensure an effective match between
the patients’ needs and nurses’
competencies.
Staffing based on patient needs,
patient acuity, nurse competen-
cies, and the status of the work
environment.
Note. LN, leadership norms (Caldwell et al., 2008); LOS, Learning Organization Survey (Garvin et al., 2008); ORCS, Organizational Readiness to Change Survey (Helfrich, Li, Sharp, & Sales, 2009); SOAPC,
Survey of Organizational Attributes for Primary Care (Ohman-Strickland et al., 2007).
* New item created for VAIL Survey.
yPreviously validated survey items included in VAIL Survey.
Nurs Outlook 68 (2020) 1425 19
Table 3 Nurse Characteristics and Perceptions of the Healthy Work Environment
Total (N= 351) Registered nurse (n= 170) Licensed vocational nurse (n= 181)
n(%) M(SD) n(%) M(SD) n(%) M(SD)
Nurse burnout (score 054)
y
321 19.4 (14.0) 161 22.1 (14.3) 160 17.0 (13.3)
Perceptions of HWE*
True collaboration (score -5) 334 2.9 (1.7) 167 2.9 (1.7) 167 2.8 (1.8)
Skilled communication (score 04) 335 2.1 (1.6) 167 2.2 (1.6) 168 2.0 (1.6)
Effective decision-making (score 03) 333 1.6 (1.2) 167 1.7 (1.2) 166 1.5 (1.3)
Authentic leadership (score 04) 331 2.3 (1.6) 166 2.2 (1.5) 165 2.3 (2.0)
Meaningful recognition (score 02) 330 1.0 (0.9) 165 1.1 (0.9) 165 1.0 (0.9)
Nurse characteristics*
Age (years) 302 47.7 (12.3) 147 50.2 (12.0) 155 45.5 (12.3)
Tenure (years) 311 5.3 (6.1) 147 5.0 (6.1) 164 5.6 (6.1)
Race/ethnicity
Non-Hispanic white 133 (37%) 72 (43%) 61 (32%)
Latino/a 19 (3%) 11 (2%) 8 (4%)
Black/African American 39 (13%) 16 (10%) 23 (15%)
Asian 86 (23%) 48 (28%) 38 (19%)
Other 41 (12%) 17 (9%) 24 (14%)
Female 265 (75%) 137 (82%) 128 (69%)
Clinic characteristics
Hospital-based clinic 153 (44%) 76 (45%) 77 (43%)
Large CBOC (>8,000 patients) 114 (32%) 58 (34%) 56 (31%)
Small CBOC (<8,000 patients) 84 (24%) 36 (21%) 48 (26%)
Healthcare system characteristics
Healthcare system 1 105 (30%) 57 (34%) 48 (26%)
Healthcare system 2 65 (18%) 26 (15%) 39 (22%)
Healthcare system 3 52 (15%) 27(16%) 25 (14%)
Healthcare system 4 84 (24%) 38 (22%) 46 (25%)
Healthcare system 5 45 (13%) 22 (13%) 23 (13%)
Note. CBOC, community-based outpatient clinic; HWE, healthy work environment.
* Observations do not sum up to full sample (n= 351) due to missing data.
20 Nurs Outlook 68 (2020) 1425
nurse burnout. Additionally, the RN (as compared to
LVN) position was associated with substantially higher
levels of burnout (b= 6.2, 95% CI = 2.47, 9.84, p<.01).
Results of the RN only model (model 7) showed that
perceptions of true collaboration were inversely associ-
ated with levels of RN burnout (b=2.6, 95% CI = 4.29,
0.84, p<.01). In the LVN only model (model 8), percep-
tions of meaningful recognition were inversely associ-
ated with LVN burnout (b=5.1, 95% CI = 8.36, 1.82,
p<.01).
Discussion
The seminal article, From triple to quadruple aim: Care of
the patient requires care of the provider (Bodenheimer &
Sinsky, 2014) calls attention to the urgent need to
improve the work life of health care providers by
improving their practice environment and reducing
burnout so that in turn, they may help achieve the ulti-
mate goal of improving population health. Findings
from this study address this call and make several
important contributions to expand the current litera-
ture on nurse burnout in primary care settings.
This study is the first study to apply the AACN’s HWE
framework to assess the nursing practice environment
within a primary care setting with the PCMH model.
Findings from this study underscore the importance of
an HWE as a key factor associated with lower levels of
nurse burnout in the PCMH. All five HWE elements
showed a strong relationship with lower levels of pri-
mary care nurse burnout in the bivariate analysis.
Among HWE elements, perceptions of true
collaboration between members of interprofessional
PCMH teams were strongly associated with lower lev-
els of burnout for primary care RNs. True collaboration
that encompasses effective communication, knowl-
edge of each other’s role, shared responsibility, trust,
and mutual respect may be especially critical for pri-
mary care RNs who play a key role in coordination of
longitudinal and comprehensive patient care delivery
in team-based models.
Given the special importance of collaboration, a
comprehensive quality improvement program to
improve team collaboration may be an effective strat-
egy to reduce primary care RN burnout. Examples of
quality improvement initiatives aimed at improving
team collaboration include standardized task sharing
processes, workflow mapping, co-location of team
members, regular huddles and team meetings as well
as use of information technology such as instant mes-
saging, to share frequent and timely information (Sin-
sky et al., 2013). Other potentially effective strategies
to improve team collaboration include interprofes-
sional team training such as the Primary Care version
of Team Strategies and Tools to Enhance Performance
and Patient Safety (TeamSTEPPS) and the “Nurse for a
Day” nurse-shadowing program that pairs medical
residents with nurses acting as the resident’s precep-
tor with the ultimate goal of the nurse-resident dyad
developing a better understanding of each other’s
roles as well as improved communication and collabo-
ration (Jain, Luo, Yang, Purkiss, & White, 2012).
Buy-in and support from nurse leaders and managers
are crucial in order to promote successful adoption and
spread of evidence-based practices aimed at facilitating
PCMH team collaboration and preventing primary care
Table 4 – Bivariate Analysis: Perceptions of Healthy Work Environment and Covariates Associated with
Nurse Burnout
bCI p
Perceptions of HWE
True collaboration (score 05) 2.6 3.5 1.7 <.001
Skilled communication (score 04) 2.7 3.8 1.7 <.001
Effective decision-making (score 03) 3.1 4.2 2.1 <.001
Authentic leadership (score 04) 2.2 3.3 1.1 <.001
Meaningful recognition (score 02) 4.4 6.4 2.3 <.001
Nurse characteristics
RN (ref: LVN) 5.1 1.3 8.8 .010
Age >45 years 3.0 0.4 6.3 .079
>6 years in clinic 1.9 2.8 6.7 .403
Non-Hispanic white (ref: Hispanic) 1.2 4.0 1.6 .393
Male (ref: female) 2.6 1.8 7.0 .235
Clinic characteristics (ref: VA Medical Center)
Large CBOC (>8,000 patients) 2.9 0.2 6.1 .067
Small CBOC (<8,000 patients) 0.2 4.0 4.4 .929
Healthcare system characteristics (ref: Healthcare System 1)
Healthcare system 2 0.1 4.5 4.3 .955
Healthcare system 3 0.7 4.6 3.1 .707
Healthcare system 4 0.3 4.2 4.8 .881
Healthcare system 5 0.9 4.8 6.7 .742
Wave (time) 2.0 6.4 2.4 .350
Note. CBOC, community-based outpatient clinic; HWE, healthy work environment; LVN, licensed vocational nurse; RN, registered nurse.
Nurs Outlook 68 (2020) 1425 21
RN burnout. In addition, for primary care nurses to func-
tion successfully as members of interprofessional PCMH
teams, nurse managers must be actively engaged in
daily functioning of PCMH teams (Giannitrapani et al.,
2019). Active involvement by nurse managers in daily
functioning of PCMH teams will promote efficient role-
based care delivery that allows nurses to practice at the
top of their education, training, and scope and may also
improve the work life of primary care nurses through
promotion of true PCMH team collaboration and mean-
ingful recognition. In turn, primary care nurses can
improve the health of the patients they care for.
Findings from this study also showed a statistically sig-
nificant association between perception of meaningful
recognition and lower levels of primary care LVN burn-
out. Meaningful recognition may come in various forms
including, but not limited to “thank you” notes, “Nurse
Week” recognitions, advancement in the clinical ladder
(Kelly & Lefton, 2017), or other opportunities for profes-
sional and/or financial growth. Another way to recognize
LVNs may be through opportunities to participate in the
Daisy Award program that provides ongoing recognition
for nurses’ clinical skill and compassion (Lefton, 2012).
Further research should focus on the most effective
ways of recognizing the contributions of the LVN role in
patient care delivery and team functioning. More impor-
tantly, recognition should be delivered in a way that is
meaningful to the “end user” (Lefton, 2012).
Another important finding from this study was the
notable variation in the level of burnout (Tables 4 and 5)
between RNs and LVNs, with RNs reporting significantly
higher levels of burnout as compared to LVNs. Most
studies evaluate both groups of nurses as one combined
sample even though RNs and LVNs experience organi-
zational and professional roles differently including (a)
diversified modes of care and expanded clinical duties;
(b) division of labor within PCMH teams; and (c) inter-
professional status in the team (Stewart, Stewart,
Lampman, Wakefield, Rosenthal & Solimeo, 2015).
Previous work has examined the relationship between
specific tasks performed by other health care providers
and burnout (Helfrich et al., 2014; Kim et al., 2018).
Although this study did not examine the level of involve-
ment in PCMH teams and specific tasks performed by
RNs vs. LVNs, these factors may also impact the level of
burnout nurses may experience. Hence, further evalua-
tion of the distinct roles various nurses have on PCMH
teams and the specific patient care tasks that RNs and
LVNs perform in relation to the levels of burnout they
experience is needed. The findings from these studies
could promote more efficient role-based care delivery,
where nurses can practice at the top of their education,
training, and scope.
Limitations
This study has limitations. The data were cross-sectional
survey and thus causality between the HWE factors and
nurse burnout could not be determined. A longitudinal
study evaluating the relationship between the primary
Table 5 Multivariable Linear Regression Analysis: Healthy Work Environment Elements and Covariates Associated with Nurse Burnout
y
Models with HWE Elements
and Covariates Associated
with Nurse Burnout (score 0-54)
1(n=313) 2(n= 313) 3 (n= 312) 4 (n= 312) 5 (n= 310) 6 (n= 309) 7 RN only (n= 158) 8 LVN only (n= 151)
Perception of HWE
y
True collaboration (score 05) 2.7*** 1.3* 2.6** 0.04
Skilled communication (score 04) 2.9*** 1.4 1.2 1.4
Effect. decision-making (score 03) 3.3*** 0.4 0.4 1.4
Authentic leadership (score 04) 2.1*** 0.87 0.1 1.2
Meaningful recognition (score 02) 4.5*** 2.8* 0.3 5.1**
Nurse characteristics
RN (ref: LVN) 5.7** 6.1** 5.8** 4.8* 5.3** 6.2** 
F27.6*** 20.3*** 28.7*** 12.9*** 13.6*** 24.2*** 3.7* 6.5**
R
2
0.15 0.15 0.12 0.09 0.11 0.17 0.14 0.18
Notes. HWE, healthy work environment; LVN, licensed vocational nurse; RN, registered nurse.
*p.05, **p.01, ***p.001.
yOnly statistically significant results (p<.05) from the bivariate analysis were included in the multivariable linear regression analysis.
22 Nurs Outlook 68 (2020) 1425
care nurses’ practice environment and burnout would
help extend findings from this and future studies.
Second, previous studies investigating PCMH imple-
mentation have found that the VHA primary care clin-
ics and providers were representative of primary care
settings in other studies (Helfrich et al., 2014, Nutting
et al., 2011). Nonetheless, findings from this study
should be interpreted with some caution when gener-
alizing to non-VHA primary care clinics, especially
those located in international settings, as this study
sample was limited to primary care clinics within one
VHA region in the United States.
Another limitation is that the survey was not specifi-
cally designed to measure the constructs of the AACN’s
HWE, which may potentially impact internal validity;
however, the measured constructs (leadership, commu-
nication, team process and satisfaction, and shared deci-
sion-making) mapped closely with those in the AACN’s
HWE and the internal consistency of the measured con-
structs was high. In addition, one of the six constructs—
appropriate staffing—was not measured here, and its
exclusion may have impacted the strength and direction
of the relationships between the HWE constructs and
burnout. Recent studies, including the study by Helfrich
et al. (2014), have demonstrated the association of having
a fully staffed PCMH team and lower levels of burnout.
Future research using validated instruments to measure
the primary practice environment such as the Practice
Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index (Lake,
2002) specifically modified for the primary care setting is
needed so that findings from such studies can guide
nursing and other organizational leaders in implementa-
tion of targeted strategies to improve nursing and patient
outcomes, particularly in primary care settings.
Conclusion
The results of this study highlight the important role of
a healthy work environment, particularly, true
collaboration between members of interprofessional
PCMH teams in reducing primary care RN burnout and
meaningful recognition in reducing primary care LVN
burnout. Nursing and other organizational leaders
should seek to achieve the Quadruple Aim (Boden-
heimer & Sinsky, 2014) by implementing evidence-
based strategies to foster an HWE in primary care set-
tings.
Acknowledgments
Funding for this project was supported through a grant
from the VA Veterans Assessment and Improvement
Laboratory for Patient-Centered Care (VAIL-PCC) and
Patient Aligned Care Team (PACT) Demonstration Lab
(#XVA 65-018) and VA Locally Initiated Project (LIP
#65162). Dr. Kim’s time was covered by the Quality
Scholars Program funded through the VA Office of Aca-
demic Affiliations (#TQS 65-000) and Dr. Yano’s time
was covered by a VA HSR&D Senior Research Career
Scientist Award (Project # RCS 05-195). The views
expressed in this article are those of the authors and
do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Supplementary materials
Supplementary material associated with this article
can be found in the online version at doi:10.1016/j.out
look.2019.06.018.
Appendix A. Maslach’s Burnout Inventory
(Emotional Exhaustion Subscale)
Never A few Times
a Year
Every
Month
A few Times
a Month
Every
Week
A few Times
a Week
Every
Day
(a) I feel emotionally drained from my work.
(b) I feel exhilarated when I accomplish some-
thing at work.
(c) I feel used up at the end of the workday.
(d) Working with people all day is really a strain
for me.
(e) I feel burned out from my work.
(f) I feel fatigued when I get up in the morning
and have to face another day on the job.
(g) I have accomplished many worthwhile
things in this job.
(h) I feel frustrated by my job.
(i) I feel I’m working too hard on my job.
(j) Working with people directly puts too much
stress on me.
(k) I feel like I’m at the end of my rope.
(l) In my opinion, I am good at my job.
Nurs Outlook 68 (2020) 1425 23
REFERENCES
American Association of Critical-Care Nurses. (2016).
AACN standards for establishing and sustaining healthy
work environments: A journey to excellence (2nd ed.). Aliso
Viejo, CA. Retrieved from https://www.aacn.org/nurs
ing-excellence/standards/aacn-standards-for-estab
lishing-and-sustaining-healthy-work-environments.
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (n.d.). Defin-
ing the PCMH. Retrieved from https://pcmh.ahrq.gov/
page/defining-pcmh
Brenninkmeijer, V., & VanYperen, N. (2003). How to con-
duct research on burnout: Advantages and disadvan-
tages of a unidimensional approach in burnout
research. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 60
(Suppl. 1), i16–i20.
Bodenheimer, T., & Sinsky, C. (2014). From triple to
quadruple aim: Care of the patient requires care of
the provider. The Annals of Family Medicine, 12(6),
573–576.
Caldwell, D. F., Chatman, J., O’Reilly, C. A. III,
Ormiston, M., & Lapiz, M. (2008). Implementing strate-
gic change in a health care system: The importance of
leadership and change readiness. Health Care Manage-
ment Review, 33(2), 124–133.
Cimiotti,J.P.,Aiken,L.H.,Sloane,D.M.,&Wu,E.S.(2012).
Nurse staffing, burnout, and health care-associated infec-
tion. American Journal of Infection Control, 40(6), 486–490.
Connor, J. A., Ziniel, S. I., Porter, C., Doherty, D.,
Moonan, M., Dwyer, P., & . . .Hickey, P. A. (2018). Inter-
professional use and validation of the AACN healthy
work environment assessment tool. Am J Crit Care, 27
(5), 363–371, doi:10.4037/ajcc2018179.
Dall’Ora, C., Griffiths, P., Ball, J., Simon, M., & Aiken, L. H.
(2015). Association of 12 h shift and nurses’ job satis-
faction, burnout and intention to leave: Findings from
a cross-sectional study of 12 European countries. BMJ
Open, 5(9) e008331.
Doulougeri, K., Georganta, K., & Montgomery, A. (2016).
“Diagnosing” burnout among healthcare professionals:
Can we find consensus? Cogent Medicine, 3(1), 1–10.
Demir, A., Ulusoy, M., & Ulusoy, M. F. (2003). Investigation
of factors influencing burnout levels in the profes-
sional and private lives of nurses. International Journal of
Nursing Studies, 40(8), 807–827.
Garvin, D. A., Edmondson, A. C., & Gino, F. (2008). Is yours
a learning organization? Harvard business review, 86(3),
109–116.
Giannitrapani, K. F., Rodriguez, H., Huynh, A. K.,
Hamilton, A. B., Kim, L., Stockdale, S. E., &
...Rubenstein, L. V. (2019). How middle managers facil-
itate interdisciplinary primary care team functioning.
Healthcare, doi:10.1016/j.hjdsi.2018.11.003.
Helfrich, C. D., Dolan, E. D., Simonetti, J., Reid, R. J., Joos, S.,
Wakefield, B. J., & ...Nelson, K. (2014). Elements of
team-based care in a patient-centered medical home
are associated with lower burnout among VA primary
care employees. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 29
(2), 659–666.
Helfrich, C. D., Li, Y. F., Sharp, N. D., & Sales, A. E. (2009).
Organizational readiness to change assessment
(ORCA): Development of an instrument based on the
Promoting Action on Research in Health Services (PAR-
IHS) framework. Implementation Science, 4(1), 38.
Jain, A., Luo, E., Yang, J., Purkiss, J., & White, C. (2012).
Implementing a nurse-shadowing program for first-
year medical students to improve interprofessional
collaborations on health care teams. Academic Medicine,
87(9), 1292–1295.
Jennings, B. (2008). Work stress and burnout among
nurses: Role of the work environment and working
conditions. In R. G. Hughes (Ed.), Patient safety and qual-
ity: An evidence-based handbook for nurses (pp. 137158).
Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and
Quality AHRQ Publication No. 08-0043.
Kelly, L. A., & Lefton, C. (2017). Effect of meaningful recog-
nition on critical care nurses’ compassion fatigue.
American Journal of Critical Care, 26(6), 438–444.
Kim, L. Y., Rose, D. E., Soban, L. M., Stockdale, S. E.,
Meredith,L.S.,Edwards,S.T.,&...Rubenstein,L.V.
(2018). Primary care tasks associated with provider burn-
out: findings from a Veterans Health Administration sur-
vey. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 33(1), 50–56.
Lake, E. T. (2002). Development of the practice environ-
ment scale of the Nursing Work Index. Research in Nurs-
ing & Health, 25(3), 176–188.
Laschinger, H. K. S., Finegan, J., & Wilk, P. (2011). Situa-
tional and dispositional influences on nurses’ work-
place well-being: The role of empowering unit
leadership. Nursing Research, 60(2), 124–131.
Laschinger, H. K. S., Grau, A. L., Finegan, J., & Wilk, P.
(2010). New graduate nurses’ experiences of bullying
and burnout in hospital settings. Journal of Advanced
Nursing, 66(12), 2732–2742.
Laschinger, H. K. S., & Leiter, M. P. (2006). The impact of
nursing work environments on patient safety out-
comes: The mediating role of burnout engagement.
Journal of Nursing Administration, 36(5), 259–267.
Leiter, M. P., & Laschinger, H. K. S. (2006). Relationships of
work and practice environment to professional burnout:
Testing a causal model. Nursing Research, 55(2), 137–146.
Lefton, C. (2012). Strengthening the workforce through
meaningful recognition. Economics, 30(6), 331.
Lewis,S.E.,Nocon,R.S.,Tang,H.,Park,S.Y.,Vable,A.M.,
Casalino, L. P., & ...Birnberg,J.M.(2012).Patient-centered
medical home characteristics and staff morale in safety
net clinics. Archives of Internal Medicine, 172(1), 23–31.
Maslach, C., Jackson, S. E., Leiter, M. P., Schaufeli, W. B., &
Schwab, R. L. (1996). Maslach burnout inventory (3 ed.).
Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2001). Job
burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 397–422.
McHugh,M.D.,Kutney-Lee,A.,Cimiotti,J.P.,Sloane,D.M.,
& Aiken, L. H. (2011). Nurses’ widespread job dissatisfac-
tion,burnout,andfrustrationwithhealthbenetssignal
problems for patient care. Health Affairs, 30(2), 202–210.
McHugh, M. D., & Ma, C. (2014). Wage, work environment,
and staffing: effects on nurse outcomes. Policy, Politics,
& Nursing Practice, 15(34), 72–80.
Meredith, L. S., Batorsky, B., Cefalu, M., Darling, J. E.,
Stockdale, S. E., Yano, E. M., & Rubenstein, L. V. (2018).
Long-term impact of evidence-based quality improve-
ment for facilitating medical home implementation on
primary care health professional morale. BMC Family
Practice, 19(1), 149.
Meredith, L. S., Hackbarth, N. S., Darling, J.,
Rodriguez, H. P., Stockdale, S. E., Cordasco, K. M., &
...Rubenstein, L. V. (2015). Emotional exhaustion in pri-
mary care during early implementation of the VA’s
medical home transformation: Patient-aligned Care
Team (PACT). Medical Care, 53(3), 253–260.
Monsalve-Reyes, C. S., San Luis-Costas, C., G
omez-
Urquiza, J. L., Albend
ın-Garc
ıa, L., Aguayo, R., &
Ca~
nadas-De la Fuente, G. A. (2018). Burnout syndrome
and its prevalence in primary care nursing: A
24 Nurs Outlook 68 (2020) 1425
systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Family Prac-
tice, 19(1), 59.
Nelson,K.M.,Helfrich,C.,Sun,H.,Hebert,P.L.,
Liu, C. F., Dolan, E., & ...Sanders, W. (2014). Imple-
mentation of the patient-centered medical home in
the Veterans Health Administration: Associations
with patient satisfaction, quality of care, staff burn-
out, and hospital and emergency department use.
JAMA, 174(8), 1350–1358.
Norful, A., Martsolf, G., de Jacq, K., & Poghosyan, L. (2017).
Utilization of registered nurses in primary care teams:
A systematic review. International Journal of Nursing
Studies, 74, 15–23.
Nutting, P. A., Crabtree, B. F., Miller, W. L., Stange, K. C.,
Stewart, E., & Ja
en, C. (2011). Transforming physician
practices to patient-centered medical homes: Lessons
from the national demonstration project. Health Affairs,
30(3), 439–445.
Stewart,K.R.,Stewart,G.L.,Lampman,M.M.,Wakeeld,B.,
Rosenthal, G., & Solimeo, S. L. (2015). Implications of the
patient centered medical home for nursing practice. The
Journal of nursing administration, 45(11), 569.
OhmanStrickland, P. A., John Orzano, A., Nutting, P. A.,
Perry Dickinson, W., ScottCawiezell, J., Hahn, K., &
...Crabtree, B. F. (2007). Measuring organizational
attributes of primary care practices: Development of a
new instrument. Health Services Research, 42(3p1), 1257–
1273.
Poghosyan, L., Clarke, S. P., Finlayson, M., & Aiken, L. H.
(2010). Nurse burnout and quality of care: Crossna-
tional investigation in six countries. Research in Nursing
& Health, 33(4), 288–298.
Reid, R. J., Coleman, K., Johnson, E. A., Fishman, P. A.,
Hsu, C., Soman, M. P., & ...Larson, E. B. (2010). The
group health medical home at year two: Cost savings,
higher patient satisfaction, and less burnout for pro-
viders. Health Affairs, 29(5), 835–843.
Sinsky, C. A., Willard-Grace, R., Schutzbank, A. M.,
Sinsky, T. A., Margolius, D., & Bodenheimer, T. (2013).
In search of joy in practice: A report of 23 high-func-
tioning primary care practices. The Annals of Family
Medicine, 11(3), 272–278.
Smolowitz,J.,Speakman,E.,Wojnar,D.,Whelan,E.M.,
Ulrich,S.,Hayes,C.,&Wood,L.(2015).Roleoftheregis-
tered nurse in primary health care: meeting health care
needs in the 21st century. Nursing Outlook, 63(2), 130–136.
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. (2014). Analyze tasks
for the patient centered medical home. Available at
https://www.patientcare.va.gov/primarycare/pact/
Resources.asp
Nurs Outlook 68 (2020) 1425 25
... Effective collaboration between nurses and other healthcare professionals is a cornerstone of a 'Positive Nursing Practice Environment'. Such an environment, in turn, fosters collaborative work [23][24][25][26]. This collaboration is characterized by open communication, teamwork, mutual respect, shared responsibility, trust, recognition of roles, shared resources, and support, allowing each professional to be heard and respected [23,[27][28][29]. ...
... Such an environment, in turn, fosters collaborative work [23][24][25][26]. This collaboration is characterized by open communication, teamwork, mutual respect, shared responsibility, trust, recognition of roles, shared resources, and support, allowing each professional to be heard and respected [23,[27][28][29]. Collegial relationships and collaboration are also linked to lower levels of burnout and fewer medication errors [24,30]. ...
... A 'Positive Nursing Practice Environment' encourages the use of the latest scientific evidence to inform decisions, promoting teamwork, care quality, and the retention of qualified professionals [40]. Nursing leaders play a critical role in facilitating the adoption of evidence-based practices [23,29,32]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background/Objectives: In recent years, research has increasingly highlighted the significance of nursing practice environments, linking positive settings with enhanced job satisfaction, professional autonomy, and care quality. Such environments can decrease turnover, stress, and costs while improving patient safety. Despite this extensive literature, there is limited consensus on defining a 'positive nursing practice environment', highlighting the need for a systematic analysis to advance understanding and application. This study aims to explore and clarify the concept of a 'Positive Nursing Practice Environment'. Methods: This study applied Walker and Avant's approach for concept analysis, conducting a comprehensive database search to gather relevant evidence. To review the available evidence on the concept of nursing practice environments, we followed the methodology proposed by JBI for scoping reviews. Results: The inclusion of 166 studies meeting the criteria provided a broad understanding of the topic, revealing 10 key attributes of a 'positive nursing practice environment' and identifying various antecedents and consequences affecting clients, nurses, and institutions. Conclusions: The concept analysis of a 'Positive Nursing Practice Environment' offers valuable insights into nurses' working conditions, systematically identifying characteristics that impact professionals, patients, and institutions. This analysis lays the groundwork for future research and practical improvements in nursing practice environments.
... When nurses work in a professional work environment, they deal with the shortages by critically reflecting on their working habits and offering alternative solutions and routines to organize their work differently. Research has shown that when nurses influence their work environment and organize their work differently, their job satisfaction and intention to stay increases (Kelly et al., 2012;Kim et al., 2020;Rodríguez-García et al., 2020). Therefore, nurse leadership not only improves the quality of care but also the work environment. ...
... Nurses' work environment is crucial for ensuring high-quality patient care and retaining nurses for practice De Simone et al., 2018;Kim et al., 2020;Wei et al., 2018). In a positive work environment nurses work autonomously, are in control over their practice, feel valued, respected and safe, and experience physical comfort, multidisciplinary collaboration, open communication, and career advancement (Maassen et al., 2021). ...
Thesis
Full-text available
Verpleegkundigen worden regelmatig uitgedaagd om af te wijken van organisatieregels en -voorschriften wanneer deze niet passen bij hun (professionele) normen en overtuigingen over goede kwaliteit van zorg. Door in suboptimale situaties te handelen in het belang van hun patiënten of een goede werkomgeving tonen verpleegkundigen leiderschap. In het proefschrift van Eline de Kok staat centraal hoe verpleegkundigen dit positief afwijkende gedrag en rebelse leiderschap in praktijk brengen. Rebelse verpleegkundigen slagen erin grenzen te verleggen, gevestigde ideeën uit te dagen en buiten de lijntjes te kleuren zonder de steun van collega's en management te verliezen. Ze gaan opzoek naar elegante en efficiënte oplossingen en veranderen daarmee uiteindelijk de praktijk. Vijf aspecten kenmerken en beïnvloeden de rebelse verpleegkundigen leiderschapspraktijken: 1) het interne conflict, 2) de kracht van reflectie, 3) kennis, ervaring en vaardigheden, 4) de invloed van netwerken, relaties en samenwerkingsverbanden, en 5) de impactvolle samenwerking tussen verpleegkundig en leidinggevenden. Dit proefschrift beschrijft het belang van rebels verpleegkundig leiderschap voor innovatie binnen de gezondheidszorg en voor verbetering van de kwaliteit van zorg en de verpleegkundige werkomgeving. Echter, laat het ook zien dat rebelse leiderschapspraktijken weerbarstig zijn, zich vaak buiten het zicht van anderen afspelen en zich regelmatig beperken tot quick fixes in het hier en nu. Dit bemoeilijkt duurzame verandering en het potentieel van deze leiderschapspraktijken blijft onbenut. Om het potentieel beter te benutten liggen er kansen in het gezamenlijk reflecteren, leren en acteren op de invloed van regels, zeggenschap, feedback, gewoonten en professionele spanningen binnen de verpleegkundige praktijk.
... The nurses' work environment is crucial to ensuring high-quality patient care [1,2]. Damschroder et al. [3] define the work environment as the inner setting of the organization in which employees work. ...
... We also thank Hester Vermeulen, Lisette Schoonhoven, Pieterbas Lalleman and Catharina van Oostveen for the constructive criticism on previous versions of this paper. 1 ...
Article
Full-text available
Background The global nursing shortages exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic necessitated a drastic reorganization in nursing practices. Work routines, the composition of teams and subsequently mundane nursing practices were all altered to sustain the accessibility and quality of care. These dramatic changes demanded a reshaping of the nurses’ work environment. The aim of this study was to explore how nurses reshaped their work environment in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods A descriptive study comprising 26 semi-structured interviews conducted in a large Dutch teaching hospital between June and September 2020. Participants were nurses (including intensive care unit nurses), outpatient clinic assistants, nurse managers, and management (including one member of the Nurse Practice Council). The interviews were analysed with open, axial, and selective coding. Results We identified five themes: 1) the Nursing Staff Deployment Plan created new micro-teams with complementary roles to meet the care needs of COVID-19 infected patients; 2) nurse-led adaptations effectively managed the increased workload, thereby ensuring the quality of care; 3) continuous professional development ensured adequate competence levels for all roles; 4) interprofessional collaboration resulted in experienced solidarity, a positive atmosphere, and increased autonomy for nurses; and, 5) supportive managers reduced nurses’ stress and improved work conditions. Conclusions This study showed that nurses positively reshaped their work environment during the COVID-19 pandemic. They contributed to innovative solutions in an environment of equal interprofessional collaboration, which led to greater respect for their knowledge and competencies, enhanced their autonomy and improved management support.
... In previous studies, social support could not alleviate the influence of job stress on feelings of burden but did alleviate burnout [77]. Moreover, primary medical staff who received adequate social support were found to be better able, both physically and mentally, to cope with job burnout [78]. Thus, people from all walks of life, especially leaders and colleagues in primary healthcare institutions, family, relatives, and friends should take an active interest in the working conditions of jaded primary medical staff. ...
... Third, this study does not investigate the dimensions of social support and psychological capital; doing so could extend our research conclusions. In addition, we did not consider the working environment factors likely to contribute to job burnout in primary medical staff, such as sufficient staffing, interprofessional relationships, authentic leadership and workplace empowerment [78]. Future research could incorporate such factors. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background Job burnout is a prevalent and emerging challenge in the primary medical system, causing mass turnover, especially of primary medical staff. Little attention has been paid to the different dimensions of job burnout (emotional exhaustion, personality disintegration, and reduced sense of achievement), which may hinder efforts to tackle high turnover intention among primary medical staff. From the perspective of conservation of resources theory, social support and psychological capital are basic resources with potential to diminish job burnout and thus lower turnover intention. However, there is insufficient research evidence on the relationships between social support, psychological capital, and the three dimensions of job burnout within the primary medical system. Objectives Focusing on primary medical staff, this study conducts a path analysis to examine the correlations between two types of resources (social support and psychological capital) and the three dimensions of job burnout, and to test the impact of the latter on turnover intention. Based on the results, effective management strategies to improve the work stability of primary medical staff are proposed. Methods Multi-stage cluster random sampling was used to select participants in Anhui Province, China. Data were collected using a self-administered questionnaire containing measures of the main variables and demographic questions. In total, 1132 valid questionnaires were returned by primary medical staff. Structural equation modeling was used for path analysis of the data. Results Social support was negatively associated with emotional exhaustion (β = − 0.088, P = 0.020), personality disintegration (β = − 0.235, P < 0.001), and reduced sense of achievement (β = − 0.075, P = 0.040). Moreover, psychological capital was negatively associated with emotional exhaustion (β = − 0.079, P = 0.030), personality disintegration (β = − 0.156, P < 0.001), and reduced sense of achievement (β = − 0.432, P < 0.001). All three dimensions of job burnout positively affected turnover intention (emotional exhaustion: β = 0.246, P < 0.001; personality disintegration: β = 0.076, P = 0.040; reduced sense of achievement: β = 0.119, P = 0.001). Conclusions The results highlight the importance of social support and psychological capital for diminishing the three dimensions of job burnout for primary medical staff and, in turn, lowering their turnover intention. Accordingly, to alleviate job burnout and improve staff retention, material and psychological supports from leaders, colleagues, family, relatives, and friends are essential, as are measures to improve the psychological energy of primary medical staff.
... It has been shown that supportive colleagues who respect and trust each other, facilitate work motivation, thus encouraging nurses to remain at work [72,73]. Other positive work environmental aspects, such as recognition for the work that the nurses perform and autonomy and fexibility to fnd creative solutions for patients, can contribute to increased job satisfaction [70] and help prevent burnout [74]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Nursing staff turnover is an increasing problem for healthcare globally. In Sweden, the shortage of nurses in primary healthcare has increased significantly in recent years. This development is alarming because primary healthcare, both in Sweden and internationally, is responsible for a large part of healthcare. The aim of this study was to explore working conditions (change fatigue, leadership climate, and social support from colleagues) and characteristics of primary care nurses who are discontent with their current job, i.e., those with high turnover intentions and poor job satisfaction in Sweden. This was a cross-sectional survey of 466 registered nurses working in Swedish primary healthcare. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and logistic regression. The results demonstrate that 21.1% of the responding nurses are discontent with their current job and have considered quitting. Being discontent had significant associations with poor leadership climate (p<0.001), lack of social support from colleagues (p<0.001), change fatigue (p<0.001), poor health (p<0.001), and working more than 40 h per week (p=0.02). The results have implications for how healthcare organizations structure the work of nurses in primary healthcare and how they can attract and retain future staff to these workplaces.
... For instance, evidence suggests that stress factors associated with the working practice environment, such as staffing levels and resource limitations, contribute significantly to CF (Ambani et al., 2020;Nantsupawat et al., 2017). A supportive and well-managed PNWE can enhance professional motivation, reduce burnout, and decrease the risk of CF (Kim et al., 2020). However, the intricate relationship between work environment characteristics and CF remains underexplored. ...
Article
Aim To explore the interplay between the perceived nursing work environment, general self‐efficacy, and compassion fatigue among registered nurses in Chinese hospitals. Background Compassion fatigue emerges as a significant occupational stress response globally, with the nursing work environment being a pivotal influencer. There is a knowledge gap in understanding how the nursing work environment and general self‐efficacy interrelate to affect compassion fatigue, particularly among Chinese nurses. Methods Employing a cross‐sectional, descriptive design, this study utilized validated questionnaires to gather data from 7085 nurses across public and private hospitals in China. The analysis focused on assessing the interrelations among the perceived nursing work environment, general self‐efficacy, and different dimensions of compassion fatigue. Finding More than half (65.67%) of the participants experienced moderate or high burnout levels, with 76.43% experiencing secondary traumatic stress. The lowest rating in the nursing work environment was for nurse/physician collaboration (10 ± 2.07), while general self‐efficacy scored higher (27.54 ± 6.26). A positive relationship existed between the work environment and both general self‐efficacy and compassion satisfaction, with a negative correlation to burnout and traumatic stress. General self‐efficacy was a partial mediator in the link between work environment and compassion fatigue, suggesting that improving the work environment can decrease compassion fatigue by boosting nurses' self‐efficacy. Conclusion This study underscores the profound impact of the nursing work environment on compassion fatigue, mediated by general self‐efficacy. It highlights the necessity of fostering a supportive work environment to enhance nurses' self‐efficacy and overall well‐being. Implications for nursing and health policy Healthcare managers and institutions must create supportive work environments to reduce compassion fatigue among nurses. This includes professional development programs to enhance self‐efficacy and job satisfaction. Policies should address high workloads and inadequate support. Nurse leaders should foster environments that promote psychological well‐being, improving outcomes for both nurses and patients. Regular assessments and adjustments of work conditions are essential to maintain a healthy work environment.
Article
Full-text available
Objetivo: Identificar a sobrecarga de trabalho dos enfermeiros da atenção primária em saúde e suas implicações para saúde mental. Método: Trata-se e uma revisão bibliográfica do tipo revisão integrativa, a partir de publicações científicas indexadas, por meio das bases de dados Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde (LILACS), Scientific Electronic Library Online (Scielo) e na National Center for Biotechnology Information (Pubmed), publicados no período de 2017 a 2022. Resultados: Foram utilizados 07 artigos na revisão, os quais respondiam à pergunta de pesquisa. diante dos estudos analisados, identificou-se que os enfermeiros da atenção primária em saúde, apresentam multitarefas, seja assistencial, gerencial e de ensino, o que ocasiona uma sobrecarga de trabalho, levando-os a altos níveis de estresse, ansiedade e angústia, o que acarreta a uma sobrecarga emocional. Conclusão: O enfermeiro da atenção primária em saúde tem multitarefas o que acarreta uma sobrecarga de trabalho, levando a um desgaste emocional com efeitos negativos, o que interfere diretamente na sua produtividade e na assistência prestada ao paciente.
Article
Full-text available
Background: Health care work environments affect patient outcomes, staff satisfaction and retention, and organizational financial viability. The American Association of Critical-Care Nurses (AACN) Healthy Work Environment Assessment Tool (HWEAT) is a resource for patient care units and organizations to assess the work environment and track progress on their journey to excellence. Objective: To validate interprofessional use of the AACN HWEAT across a large free-standing children's hospital. Methods: The AACN HWEAT was administered to staff members across professional categories. Responses were averaged to achieve an overall score and a score for each standard included in the instrument. Nurses' and physicians' scores were further stratified. Test-retest reliability and internal consistency were assessed. Construct validity was measured by correlating the AACN HWEAT and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (H-SOPS). Results: Of 2621 AACN HWEAT surveys, 1030 (39.3%) were returned for review. The organization-wide HWEAT mean overall score was 3.58 (3.87 for physicians vs 3.54 for nurses, P= .02). Test-retest reliability was indicated by Spearman correlation coefficients of 0.50 to 0.68. Internal consistency was shown by a Cronbach α of 0.77 overall (range for standards, 0.77-0.81). Convergent validity between AACN HWEAT standards and AHRQ H-SOPS items was shown by correlation coefficients of 0.30 to 0.52. Conclusion: The AACN HWEAT was both reliable and valid, supporting its interprofessional use as an organizational measure. Active evaluation of health care environments is critical to achieving optimal patient outcomes.
Article
Full-text available
Background: Poor morale among primary care providers (PCPs) and staff can undermine the success of patient-centered care models such as the patient-centered medical home that rely on highly coordinated inter-professional care teams. Medical home literature hypothesizes that participation in quality improvement can ease medical home transformation. No studies, however, have assessed the impact of quality improvement participation on morale (e.g., burnout or dissatisfaction) during transformation. The objective of this study is to examine whether primary care practices participating in evidence-based quality improvement (EBQI) during medical home transformation reduced burnout and increased satisfaction over time compared to non-participating practices. Methods: We used a longitudinal quasi-experimental design to examine the impact of EBQI (vs. no EBQI), a multi-level, interdisciplinary approach for engaging frontline primary care practices in developing evidence-based improvement innovations and tools for spread on PCP and staff morale following the 2010 national implementation of the medical home model in the Veterans Health Administration. The sample included 356 primary care employees (107 primary care providers and 249 staff) from 23 primary care practices (6 intervention and 17 comparison) within one Veterans Health Administration region. Three intervention practices began EBQI in 2011 (early) and three more began EBQI in 2012 (late). Three waves of surveys were administered across 42 months beginning in November 2011 and ending in January 2016 approximately 2 years 18 months apart. We used repeated measures analysis of the survey data on medical home teams. Main outcome measures were the emotional exhaustion subscale from the Maslach Burnout Inventory, and job satisfaction. Results: Six of 26 approved EBQI innovations directly addressed provider and staff morale; all 26 addressed medical home implementation challenges. Survey rates were 63% for baseline and 48% for both follow-up waves. Age was associated with lower burnout among PCPs (p = .039) and male PCPs had higher satisfaction (p = .037). Controlling for practice and PCP/staff characteristics, burnout increased by 5 points for PCPs in comparison practices (p = .024) and decreased by 1.4 points for early and 6.8 points (p = .039) for the late EBQI practices. Conclusions: Engaging PCPs and staff in EBQI reduced burnout over time during medical home transformation.
Article
Full-text available
Background: burnout syndrome is a significant problem in nursing professionals. Although, the unit where nurses work may influence burnout development. Nurses that work in primary care units may be at higher risk of burnout. The aim of the study was to estimate the prevalence of emotional exhaustion, depersonalization and low personal accomplishment in primary care nurses. Methods: We performed a meta-analysis. We searched Pubmed, CINAHL, Scopus, Scielo, Proquest, CUIDEN and LILACS databases up to September 2017 to identify cross-sectional studies assessing primary care nurses' burnout with the Maslach Burnout Inventory were included. The search was done in September 2017. Results: After the search process, n = 8 studies were included in the meta-analysis, representing a total sample of n = 1110 primary care nurses. High emotional exhaustion prevalence was 28% (95% Confidence Interval = 22-34%), high depersonalization was 15% (95% Confidence Interval = 9-23%) and 31% (95% Confidence Interval = 6-66%) for low personal accomplishment. Conclusions: Problems such as emotional exhaustion and low personal accomplishment are very common among primary care nurses, while depersonalization is less prevalent. Primary care nurses are a burnout risk group.
Article
Full-text available
Background The patient-centered medical home (PCMH) is a primary care delivery model predicated on shared responsibility for patient care among members of an interprofessional team. Effective task sharing may reduce burnout among primary care providers (PCPs). However, little is known about the extent to which PCPs share these responsibilities, and which, if any, of the primary care tasks performed independently by the PCPs (vs. shared with the team) are particularly associated with PCP burnout. A better understanding of the relationship between these tasks and their effects on PCP burnout may help guide focused efforts aimed at reducing burnout. Objective To investigate (1) the extent to which PCPs share responsibility for 14 discrete primary care tasks with other team members, and (2) which, if any, of the primary care tasks performed by the PCPs (without reliance on team members) are associated with PCP burnout. Design Secondary data analysis of Veterans Health Administration (VHA) survey data from two time periods. Participants 327 providers from 23 VA primary care practices within one VHA regional network. Main Measures The dependent variable was PCP report of burnout. Independent variables included PCP report of the extent to which they performed 14 discrete primary care tasks without reliance on team members; team functioning; and PCP-, clinic-, and system-level variables. Key Results In adjusted models, PCP reports of intervening on patient lifestyle factors and educating patients about disease-specific self-care activities, without reliance on their teams, were significantly associated with burnout (intervening on lifestyle: b = 4.11, 95% CI = 0.39, 7.83, p = 0.03; educating patients: b = 3.83, 95% CI = 0.33, 7.32, p = 0.03). Conclusions Performing behavioral counseling and self-management education tasks without relying on other team members for assistance was associated with PCP burnout. Expanding the roles of nurses and other healthcare professionals to assume responsibility for these tasks may ease PCP burden and reduce burnout.
Article
Full-text available
Burnout is an established phenomenon across cultures and occupations. The Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) is the most commonly used measure of burnout. The MBI delineates burnout according to three components (emotional exhaustion, depersonalization and reduced personal accomplishment) and provides the opportunity to assign a classification of burnout. However, the criteria of what constitutes burnout and/or low, medium or high burnout varies considerably. In the following paper, we have systematically reviewed studies of healthcare professionals that specifically “diagnose” burnout. Results indicate multiple approaches to assigning different levels of burnout. The need for a consensus on how to classify different degrees of burnout is discussed.
Article
Full-text available
Objectives: 12 h shifts are becoming increasingly common for hospital nurses but there is concern that long shifts adversely affect nurses' well-being, job satisfaction and intention to leave their job. The aim of this study is to examine the association between working long shifts and burnout, job dissatisfaction, dissatisfaction with work schedule flexibility and intention to leave current job among hospital nurses. Methods: Cross-sectional survey of 31 627 registered nurses in 2170 general medical/surgical units within 488 hospitals across 12 European countries. Results: Nurses working shifts of ≥12 h were more likely than nurses working shorter hours (≤8) to experience burnout, in terms of emotional exhaustion (adjusted OR (aOR)=1.26; 95% CI 1.09 to 1.46), depersonalisation (aOR=1.21; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.47) and low personal accomplishment (aOR=1.39; 95% CI 1.20 to 1.62). Nurses working shifts of ≥12 h were more likely to experience job dissatisfaction (aOR=1.40; 95% CI 1.20 to 1.62), dissatisfaction with work schedule flexibility (aOR=1.15; 95% CI 1.00 to 1.35) and report intention to leave their job due to dissatisfaction (aOR=1.29; 95% CI 1.12 to 1.48). Conclusions: Longer working hours for hospital nurses are associated with adverse outcomes for nurses. Some of these adverse outcomes, such as high burnout, may pose safety risks for patients as well as nurses.
Article
Background: The Veterans Health Administration (VA) primary care is organized as a Patient Centered Medical Home (PCMH) that is based on continuity management of patient panels by interdisciplinary "teamlets" consisting of primary care providers, nurses, and clerical associates. While the teamlets are envisioned as interdisciplinary in this model, teamlet members may continue to report separately to middle management supervisors within their respective disciplines. Little is known about the role of middle managers in medical home implementation; therefore, the study purpose is to examine and characterize teamlet members' perceptions of middle managers' role in primary care operations and teamlet functioning in an outpatient setting. Methods: This study applied a formal qualitative data collection method and analysis based on semi-structured interviews of 79 frontline interdisciplinary staff (primary care providers, nurses, and clerical associates) in VA Patient Aligned Care Teams (PACT) teamlets. Interviews were analyzed using a method of constant comparison. Results: Teamlet members recognize that their supervising middle managers are essential to daily functioning of PACT teamlets in terms of clarifying roles and responsibilities, setting expectations, providing coverage strategies, supporting conflict resolution, and facilitating teamlet-initiated innovation. Teamlet members identified challenges when middle manager involvement was lacking. Conclusion: Within a multilevel system, frontline interdisciplinary staff continue to perceive the need for leadership by middle managers from their own professional disciplines for solving interdisciplinary problems, setting role-specific schedules and expectations, and fostering innovation. As such, greater focus on the structure and training of middle managers for participation in PCMH models is needed.
Article
Background: As caregivers in high-pressure environments, critical care nurses are at risk for burnout and secondary trauma-components of compassion fatigue. Recent findings have increased understanding of the phenomena, specifically that satisfaction and meaningful recognition may play a role in reducing burnout and raising compassion satisfaction; however, no large multisite studies of compassion fatigue have been conducted. Objectives: To examine the effect of meaningful recognition and other predictors on compassion fatigue in a multicenter national sample of critical care nurses. Methods: A quantitative, descriptive online survey was completed by 726 intensive care unit nurses in 14 hospitals with an established meaningful recognition program and 410 nurses in 10 hospitals without such a program. Site coordinators at each hospital coordinated distribution of the survey to nurses to assess multiple predictors against outcomes, measured by the Professional Quality of Life Scale. Cross-validation and linear regression modeling were conducted to determine significant predictors of burnout, secondary traumatic stress, and compassion satisfaction. Results: Similar levels of burnout, secondary traumatic stress, compassion satisfaction, overall satisfaction, and intent to leave were reported by nurses in hospitals with and without meaningful recognition programs. Meaningful recognition was a significant predictor of decreased burnout and increased compassion satisfaction. Additionally, job satisfaction and job enjoyment were highly predictive of decreased burnout, decreased secondary traumatic stress, and increased compassion satisfaction. Conclusions: In addition to acknowledging and valuing nurses' contributions to care, meaningful recognition could reduce burnout and boost compassion satisfaction.
Article
Background: Registered nurses are increasingly becoming embedded in primary care teams yet there is a wide variability in nursing roles and responsibilities across organizations. Policy makers are calling for a closer look at how to best utilize registered nurses in primary care teams. Lack of knowledge about effective primary care nursing roles and responsibilities challenges policy makers' abilities to develop recommendations to effectively deploy registered nurses in primary care needed to assure efficient, evidence-based, and quality health care. Objective: To synthesize international evidence about primary care RN roles and responsibilities to make recommendations for maximizing the contributions of RNs in team-based primary care models. Design: Systematic review. Data sources: The Meta-Analysis and Systematic Reviews of Observational Studies framework guided the conduct of this review. Five electronic databases (OVID Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE, PubMed and Cochrane Library) were searched using MeSH terms: primary care, roles, and responsibilities. The term "nurs*" was truncated to identify all literature relevant to nursing. Review methods: The initial search yielded 2243. Abstracts and titles were screened for relevance and seventy-one full text reviews were completed by two researchers. Inclusion criteria included: (1) registered nurses practicing in interprofessional teams; (2) description of registered nursing roles and responsibilities; (3) primary care setting. All eligible studies underwent quality appraisal using the Integrative Quality Criteria for Review of Multiple Study Designs tool. Results: Eighteen studies met eligibility across six countries: Australia, United States, Spain, Canada, New Zealand, and South Africa. Registered nurses play a large role in chronic disease management, patient education, medication management, and often can shift between clinical and administrative responsibilities. There are a limited number of registered nurses that participate in primary care policy making and research. Conclusion: Integrating registered nurses into primary care has the potential to increase patient access to a primary care provider because registered nurses can supplement some of the provider workload: they renew prescriptions, address patient questions, and provide patient education. Clear practice protocols and nursing policy should be written by registered nurses to ensure safe, and effective nursing care. The use of a medical assistant or nurse's aide to perform non-nursing tasks allows registered nurses to take on more complex patient care. Future research should expand on emerging payment models for nurse-specific tasks.
Article
Objective: The experiences of RNs and licensed practical nurses (LPNs) implementing a patient-centered medical home (PCMH) in the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) primary care clinics were examined to understand model implications for nursing practice and professional identity. Background: National implementation of the PCMH model, called patient-aligned care teams (PACTs) in VA, emphasizes areas of nursing expertise, yet little is known about the effect of medical homes on the day-to-day work of nurses. Methods: As part of a formative evaluation to identify barriers and facilitators to PACT implementation, we interviewed 18 nurses implementing PACT. Results: Challenges to nurse's organizational and professional roles were experienced differently by RNs and LPNs in the following areas: (1) diversified modes of care and expanded clinical duties, (2) division of labor among PACT nurses, and (3) interprofessional status in the team. Conclusions: Healthcare managers implementing PCMH should consider its inherent cultural and practice transformations.