Content uploaded by Walter Staiano
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Walter Staiano on Jul 29, 2019
Content may be subject to copyright.
RESEARCH POSTER PRESENTATION DESIGN © 2012
www.PosterPresentations.com
•Perception of effort is a limiting factor for Football
performance in highly-motivated individuals (Smith et al.,
2018; Staiano et al., 2018)
•Perception of effort is associated with activity of the
anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) (Williamson et al., 2001;
2002; Staiano et al. unpublished results), not afferent feedback
from the body (Marcora, 2009)
•Damage of the ACC is associated with changes in effort-
based decision-making (rats become “lazy”) (Walton et al.,
2002)
•Mentally fatiguing tasks based on visual and audio stimuli
strongly activate the ACC (Boksem and Tops, 2008)
•The brain adapts to various stimuli and stressors by changing
its structure and function (brain plasticity) (Kolb, 1995)
ABSTRACT HYPOTHESES
INTRODUCTION: It has been hypostasized that acute negative effect of
mental fatigue (MF) could potentially become atraining stimulus for
the brain (Brain endurance training [BET]) to adapt and improve its
ability to better sustain or attenuate MF states during sport
competitions.The aim of this study was to test the efficacy of BET to
reduce fatigue during abattery of cognitive and physical tests in
players from aprofessional football team.We hypothesized that
combination of BET and standard physical training during a 4-week
period would increase cognitive capacity and physical football
performance by increasing resilience to fatigue, more than standard
football training alone.METHODS:22 professional football players
were randomly assigned to 2different training groups:BET and
Control.Both groups completed 20 supervised physical training
sessions.Immediately after each session BET group completed on
average 400 min (20 min/session) of cognitive training.Control group,
instead, was asked to listen to neutral music for the same amount of
time.Endurance performance (30-15 Intermittent Fitness Te st) , Sprint
and Decision Making (RSA Random Test), Reactive Agility alongside
with cognitive performance (STROOP and PVT Task)were measured at
baseline (pre-test) and after 4weeks of training (post-test).Data were
analyzed using mixed model ANOVAs. RESULTS: STROOP and PVT task
showed reaction time in both groups decreased at post-test.However,
BET decreased significantly more compared to control group (p <
0.02)despite no significant differences in accuracy.
BET group completed the reactive agility test significantly faster than
the control group (p < 0.05)and with lesser fouls (p < 0.03). During
the RSA Random Test no significant differences were found between
the groups for linear acceleration phase (first 10 m). However,BET
group completed significantly faster (p < 0.05)the decisional phase
(second 10 m).Distance covered during the 30-15 test showed there
was no difference in the performance of the BET group.However,
control group showed asignificant decrease (p < 0.05)in
performance.CONCLUSION:The results of this study provide evidence
that the combination of BET and standard football training is more
effective than standard training alone in boosting cognitive and
physical performance in elite football players.
RATIONALE
PHYSICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS CONCLUSIONS AND DIRECTIONS
BET seems highly effective in improving football performance when
combined with traditional physical training in professional players
Those results confirmed a previous study proving efficacy of BET in
boosting cycling performance.
BET increases inhibitory control & continuous sustained attention ability
BET could be used to increase training load in elite athletes without
overloading the musculoskeletal system (injury prevention)
BET could be used in injured athletes that cannot perform physical
training
Beware overtraining (increased load on the brain)
Future studies:
BET in females elite athletes and/or in different sports.
Optimisation of BET (volume, intensity, frequency, duration)
Neurobiological mechanisms underlying positive effects of BET on
perception of effort on sport performance.
REFERENCES
•Boksem, MA.Tops, M.(2008) Mental fatigue: costs and benefits. Brain Res
R e v. Nov;59(1):125-39.
•Kolb, B. (1995). Brain plasticity and behavior. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
•Smith, M.R., Thompson, C., Marcora, S.M. et al. Mental Fatigue and Soccer:
Current Knowledge and Future Directions, Sports Med (2018) 48: 1525.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-018-0908-2
•Staiano et al. (2018) The cardinal exercise stopper: Muscle fatigue, muscle
pain or perception of effort? Prog. Brain Res.
•Marcora, S. (2009). Perception of effort during exercise is independent of
afferent feedback from skeletal muscles, heart, and lungs. Journal of
Applied Physiology (Bethesda, Md.: 1985), 106(6), 2060-2062.
•Walton M, Bannerman D, Rushworth M. (2002). The role of rat medial frontal
cortex in effort-based decision making. J Neurosci, 22: 10996–11003.
•Williamson, J.W., Mccoll, R., Mathews, D., Mitchell, J.H., Raven, P.B.,
Morgan, W.P., (2001). Hypnotic Manipulation Of Effort Sense During Dynamic
Exercise: Cardiovascular Responses And Brain Activation. J Appl Physiol, 90,
1392-1399.
•Marcora SM, Staiano W, Merlini M, editors. A randomised controlled trial of
Brain Endurance Training (BET) to reduce fatigue during endurance exercise.
62nd Annual Meeting of the American College of Sports Medicine; 2015 May
26–30; San Diego (USA): American College of Sports Medicine.
ACKNOLEDGMENTS
We would like to thank SSWITCH NPS company for providing
the application for the training protocol (SOMA NPT)
Systematic repetition of mentally fatiguing tasks:
•increases training load on the brain
•induces adaptations relevant cortical areas
•reduces perception of effort
•Increases resilience toward fatigue
•Increases sport performance
COGNITIVE AND PERCEPTUAL RESULTS
Dr. Walter Staiano1; Michele Merlini2; Chiara Gattoni 2, Prof. Samuele Marcora2
1. University of Southern Denmark, SDU (DEN) ; 2. School of Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Kent (UK)
IMPACT OF 4-WEEK BRAIN ENDURANCE TRAINING (BET) ON COGNITIVE
AND PHYSICAL PERFORMANCE IN PROFESSIONAL FOOTBALL PLAYERS
Changes in RAT induced by SOMA BET and traditional physical training
# Significant changes at post-test (P< 0.05)
METHODS
Study Design
Using arandomized controlled trial design, we assess the efficacy of BET +
traditional football training (SOMA BET Training) against traditional football
training only (Control) in aprofessional football team during pre-season
period.We randomly allocated 22 male subjects to either SOMA BET training
or Control.Participants were tested at baseline (pre-test) and after four weeks
of training (post-test).
Training Procedures
•Participants allocated to the SOMA training group undertook the normal
training routine.On top of the physical training, at the end of each training
session they completed aspecific cognitive task (players could choose
between 5different tasks to complete) for atime between 20 and 30 min
(from 3to 5times aweek).
•Participants allocated to the control group performed the normal training
routine without performing any cognitive task (traditional physical training).
However, to avoid any biased results as control group was not performing
any specific cognitive training, they were asked to listen to aspecific sound
at the end of each training session (for the same amount of time as SOMA
training group).
•For both groups, during the 4-week training, between 20 and 25 training
sessions have been completed.The SOMA training group completed on
average 400 min of cognitive training during the 4-week period.Sessional
RPE, HR and NASA-TLX Scale were used to measure training load and the
subjective workload of each of the training sessions.
Testing Procedures
•All participants were familiarized with the testing procedures and protocols
•Battery of cognitive test:STROOP and PVT
•Physical Tests :30-15 Intermittent Fitness Test (IFT) Test, Repeated Sprint
Ability -RSA-and Specific Reactive Agility tests (RAT)
•HR, Blood Lactate and RPE were measured for all physical tests.
Changes in 30-15 IFT induced by SOMA BET and traditional physical training
# Significant changes at post-test (P< 0.05)
Changes in RSA induced by SOMA BET and traditional physical training
# Significant changes at post-test (P< 0.05)
Changes in PVT reaction time and numbers of errors
induced by SOMA BET and traditional physical training
# Significant changes at post-test (P< 0.05)
Changes in STROOP reaction time and accuracy
induced by SOMA BET and traditional physical training
# Significant changes at post-test (P< 0.05)
Weekly rating of mental demand of SOMA BET and traditional physical training
# Significant changes at post-test (P< 0.05)