PosterPDF Available

Psychophysiological Data and Computer Vision to Assess Cognitive Load and Team Dynamics in Cardiac Surgery

Authors:
  • Harvard Medical School | Brigham and Women's Hospital

Abstract and Figures

The cardiac operating room (OR) is a high-risk environment where several specialized providers work as team to provide care for patients undergoing complex surgical pro-cedures. Cardiac surgery can be conceptualized as a team-based sociotechnical system with critical requirements for communication and coordination. Contemporary research in this realm has moved away from the individual as the unit of cognitive analysis, and a new focus on the activity system (human actors, their tools and the environment) has been proposed; this framework has been referred to as “distributed cognition”.[1] To execute highly specialized tasks, resources are distributed throughout the OR team, as well as the cognitive demands imposed by the surgical tasks. Furthermore, the dynam-ics of team activities may provide relevant information for understanding the multitude of factors that impact surgical performance and patient safety outcomes.[2] Previous research has shown that certain patterns extracted from team members’ position and motion data can predict team coordination and cohesion..[3] In this pilot study, we de-scribe a novel integrative approach that captures objective measures of team cognitive load (heart rate variability), as well as position and motion metrics from multiple OR team members generated by a computer vision system. Our aim was to investigate the feasibility of using this novel approach to integrate and visualize team dynamics and cognitive load metrics gathered from the OR team during a real-life cardiac surgery.
Content may be subject to copyright.
This material is based upon work supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) of the
National Institutes of Health under award 1R01HL126896-01A1. The content is solely the responsibility of
the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the funding agencies.
Psychophysiological Data and Computer Vision to Assess
Cognitive Load and Team Dynamics in Cardiac Surgery
Roger D. Dias1,2, Steven J. Yule1,3, Lauren Kennedy-Metz4, and Marco A. Zenati3,4
1 STRATUS Center for Medical Simulation, Brigham & Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
2 Department of Emergency Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
3 Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
4 Division of Cardiac Surgery, VA Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA
rdias@bhw.harvard.edu
1 Purpose
The cardiac operating room (OR) is a high-risk environment where several specialized
providers work as team to provide care for patients undergoing complex surgical pro-
cedures. Cardiac surgery can be conceptualized as a team-based sociotechnical system
with critical requirements for communication and coordination. Contemporary research
in this realm has moved away from the individual as the unit of cognitive analysis, and
a new focus on the activity system (human actors, their tools and the environment) has
been proposed; this framework has been referred to as “distributed cognition”. [1] To
execute highly specialized tasks, resources are distributed throughout the OR team, as
well as the cognitive demands imposed by the surgical tasks. Furthermore, the dynam-
ics of team activities may provide relevant information for understanding the multitude
of factors that impact surgical performance and patient safety outcomes.[2] Previous
research has shown that certain patterns extracted from team members’ position and
motion data can predict team coordination and cohesion..[3] In this pilot study, we de-
scribe a novel integrative approach that captures objective measures of team cognitive
load (heart rate variability), as well as position and motion metrics from multiple OR
team members generated by a computer vision system. Our aim was to investigate the
feasibility of using this novel approach to integrate and visualize team dynamics and
cognitive load metrics gathered from the OR team during a real-life cardiac surgery.
2 Methods
2.1 Study Design, Setting and Participants
We studied a cardiac surgical team during a real-life coronary-artery bypass grafting
surgery (CABG). This procedure involves an open-heart surgery, requiring a highly
specialized team of 6-12 providers divided into four subteams. This study was approved
by the local Institutional Review Board (IRB).
2 R. Dias et al.
2.2 Cognitive Load Metrics (Heart Rate Variability)
Attending surgeons, anesthesiologists and perfusionists were equipped with a heart rate
sensor (Polar H7 chest strap) that captures the intervals between successive heart beats
(RR intervals) in milliseconds, and transmits the data, via Bluetooth connection, to a
receiving station (sports watch (Polar V800). Previous research has used RR intervals
as a psychophysiological measure surgeon’s cognitive workload.[4] Raw data was ex-
ported in .txt format and analyzed in Kubios HRV (version 3.1.0), where an automatic
RR artefact correction method was used to remove artefacts and ectopic beats. Artefacts
were replaced with interpolated values using a cubic spline interpolation.
2.3 Team Dynamics Metrics (Position and Motion Tracking)
A GoPro Hero 4 camera (1280 x 720 pixels, 30 fps) was used to record the entire pro-
cedure. The first 5 minutes of the Separation from Bypass step was analyzed. This is a
critical step and imposes the highest cognitive demand to the OR cardiac team.[5]
OpenPose is an open-source, deep-learning enabled computer vision system capable
of detecting multiple humans and labeling up to 25 key body points using 2D video
input from conventional cameras. The architecture of this system uses a two-branch
multi-stage convolutional network (CNN) in which each stage in the first branch pre-
dicts confidence 2D maps of body part locations, and each stage in the second branch
predicts Part Affinity Fields (PAF) which encode the degree of association between
parts. Training and validation of the OpenPose algorithms were evaluated on two
benchmarks for multi-person pose estimation: the MPII human multi-person dataset
and the COCO 2016 keypoints challenge dataset. Both datasets had images collected
from diverse real-life scenarios, such as crowding, scale variation, occlusion and con-
tact. The OpenPose system exceeded previous state-of-the-art systems.[6] We pro-
cessed the 5-minute video using this software (version 1.4.0) and exported x and y co-
ordinates (in pixels) of the position of the neck of each OR team member, per frame, in
JSON format. For each detected point a confidence score from 0 to 1 was provided
based on the comparison with ground-truth data from the system’s library. To measure
motion, we calculated the distance (in pixels) from the team member’s neck point to a
stationary reference point (patient’s heart) for each frame. Then, we calculated frame-
to-frame change in distance, which was used to calculate the velocity (pixels/second)
in which each participant moved over time. Team centrality was calculated by the dis-
tance between each team member and the patient’s heart (surgical field).
2.4 Data Integration and Visualization
To integrate and synchronize position and motion data generated by the computer vi-
sion software and physiological data gathered by the heart rate sensor, we used the
InterAct software (Mangold v. 16.0). A visual analytics software (Tableau v2018.1)
was used to create a heat map of the position of each team member in the OR, displaying
the density of the neck position over a 5-minute period.
3
3 Results
The analysis of the 5-minute video generated 90.000 frames, detecting 7 different peo-
ple in the OR. The neck keypoint of all team members was detected in 96% of the
frames, with a mean confidence score of 0.83 (standard deviation = 0.11). A heat map
plotting the density of people’s position is shown in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. Density of individual’s position (A), and team centrality (B) measured by the distance
between each team member and the patient’s heart (surgical field) during Separation from By-
pass.
The processed video was overlaid with team members skeletons (See supplemental
video) and synchronized with the physiological signals (RR intervals) and motion met-
rics (neck keypoint velocity) of the core cardiac team members. This integrated view
allows the simultaneous analysis of team dynamics and cognitive load. (Fig. 2)
4 R. Dias et al.
Fig. 2. Integrated visualization of motion tracking, cognitive load and team dynamics metrics.
4 Conclusion
This pilot study demonstrates the feasibility of a novel integrative approach to capture
team cognitive load and team dynamics metrics during complex surgical procedures.
This approach uses heart rate variability as an objective and unobtrusive measure of
cognitive load and a deep learning-based system that performs multi-person pose esti-
mation from videos recorded with regular cameras. The main novelty of the proposed
approach is its ability to monitor in real-time the cognitive load imposed by the surgical
tasks to the OR team members while simultaneously capturing relevant spatial relation-
ships between team members, the patient and medical devices in the OR environment.
Future studies can use similar approach to investigate the relationship between team
cognitive load, team dynamics metrics and surgical patient outcomes.
Bibliography
1. Hazlehurst B, McMullen CK, Gorman PN. Distributed cognition in the heart room: how
situation awareness arises from coordinated communications during cardiac surgery. J
Biomed Inform. 2007;40:539-51.
2. Tiferes J, Hussein AA, Bisantz A, et al. The Loud Surgeon Behind the Console:
Understanding Team Activities During Robot-Assisted Surgery. J Surg Educ. 2016;504-12.
3. Gorman JC, Dunbar TA, Grimm D, et al. Understanding and Modeling Teams As
Dynamical Systems. Front Psychol. 2017;8:1053.
4. Dias RD, Ngo-Howard MC, Boskovski MT, et al. Systematic review of measurement tools
to assess surgeons' intraoperative cognitive workload. Br J Surg. 2018;105(5)491-501.
5. Wadhera RK, Parker SH, Burkhart HM, et al. Is the "sterile cockpit" concept applicable to
cardiovascular surgery critical intervals or critical events? The impact of protocol-driven
communication during cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;139:312-
6. Cao Z, Simon T, Wei S, Sheikh Y. Realtime Multi-person 2D Pose Estimation Using Part
Affinity Fields. 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
(CVPR)2017. p. 1302-10.
... The use of entropy measures to infer team cognitive states in surgical teams was also demonstrated when team members' physiological data was used, instead of motion data. Dias et al. [13] have used heart rate variability parameters from surgeons, anesthesiologists, and perfusionists during cardiac surgery to measure cognitive load at the team level. In this study, the entropy of the team cognitive states streaming overtime, based on physiological parameters, was sensitive enough to detect variations in team cognitive load and uncertainty. ...
... SA metrics based on computer vision can also be used in computer-based cognitive systems aiming to augment the cognitive capabilities of the surgical team [6], particularly in situations prone to errors, such as during emergencies and/or complex operations. Previous studies have shown the potential to integrate motion analysis metrics from surgical with psychophysiological parameters, such as heart rate variability as a proxy for the cognitive load [13]. A multi-modal approach could be used for developing context-and cognitiveaware systems able to monitor de surgical team's cognitive states and the surgical workflow, with the capability of providing real-time corrective feedback [19,20]. ...
Conference Paper
Situational awareness (SA) at both individual and team levels, plays a critical role in the operating room (OR). During the pre-incision time-out, the entire OR team comes together to deploy the surgical safety checklist (SSC). Worldwide, the implementation of the SSC has been shown to reduce intraoperative complications and mortality among surgical patients. In this study, we investigated the feasibility of applying computer vision analysis on surgical videos to extract team motion metrics that could differentiate teams with good SA from those with poor SA during the pre-incision time-out. We used a validated observation-based tool to assess SA, and a computer vision software to measure body position and motion patterns in the OR. Our findings showed that it is feasible to extract surgical team motion metrics captured via off-the-shelf OR cameras. Entropy as a measure of the level of team organization was able to distinguish surgical teams with good and poor SA. These findings corroborate existing studies showing that computer vision-based motion metrics have the potential to integrate traditional observation-based performance assessments in the OR.
... In fact, we have demonstrated that both perceived and objective measured (via HRV) cognitive load varies depending on team role and surgical step. 28,29 A useful conceptual model that can be applied in cardiothoracic surgery is the "distributed cognition" framework. It considers the activity system as the unit of cognitive analysis rather that the individual team member, allowing the study of how cognitive resources and demands are handled and distributed throughout the surgical team. ...
... We demonstrated the feasibility of using multiperson pose estimation from video recordings in conjunction with psychophysiological data reflecting team cognitive load. 28 Our work illustrates the utility in computer vision approaches to monitor spatial relationships between providers, the patient, and medical devices in the operating room, and the added potential to incorporate temporal cognitive workload data simultaneously (Fig. 4). ...
Article
Cognitive Engineering is focused on how humans can cope and master the complexity of processes and technological environments. In cardiothoracic surgery, the goal is to support safe and effective human performance by preventing medical errors. Strategies derived from cognitive engineering research could be introduced in cardiothoracic surgery practice in the near future to enhance patient safety and outcomes.
... The most common methods rely on physical markers or sensors directly placed on the surgeon, such as Inertial Measurement Units (IMU), electromyographic sensors, or reflective bulbs [16,17,19,37], that can be cumbersome. Concerning marker-less assessment, some studies used OpenPose to assess the surgeon's cognitive skills [38] or to perform automatic surgical procedure recognition [39]. Conversely, no study used marker-less methods to assess the surgeon's postural skills by comparing postural behaviour variability in function of the expertise level. ...
... This dynamic field demands both physical and mental effort, with high demand on concentration and the ability to react and adapt to quick, unexpected changes. [2][3][4][5][6] Surgeons need high fidelity, high quality, objective and quantitative feedback to measure their performance in order to optimise their performance and improve patient safety. These data should be time-sensitive and lack bias or judgement. ...
Article
Full-text available
Introduction Surgeons need high fidelity, high quality, objective, non-judgemental and quantitative feedback to measure their performance in order to optimise their performance and improve patient safety. This can be provided through surgical sabermetrics, defined as ‘advanced analytics of digitally recorded surgical training and operative procedures to enhance insight, support professional development and optimise clinical and safety outcomes’. The aim of this scoping review is to investigate the assessment of surgeon’s non-technical skills using sabermetrics principles, focusing on digital, automated measurements that do not require a human observer. Methods and analysis To investigate the current methods of digital, automated measurements of surgeons’ non-technical skills, a systematic scoping review will be conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines, using databases from medicine and other fields. Covidence software is used for screening of potential studies. A data extraction tool will be developed specifically for this study to evaluate the methods of measurement. Quality assurance will be assessed using Quality Assessment Tool for Diverse Designs. Multiple reviewers will be responsible for screening of studies and data extraction. Ethics and dissemination This is a review study, not using primary data, and therefore, ethical approval is not required. A range of methods will be employed for dissemination of the results of this study, including publication in journals and conference presentations.
... The most common methods rely on physical markers or sensors directly placed on the surgeon, such as Inertial Measurement Units (IMU), electromyographic sensors, or reflective bulbs [16,17,19,37], that can be cumbersome. Concerning marker-less assessment, some studies used OpenPose to assess the surgeon's cognitive skills [38] or to perform automatic surgical procedure recognition [39]. Conversely, no study used marker-less methods to assess the surgeon's postural skills by comparing postural behaviour variability in function of the expertise level. ...
Article
PurposeSurgery simulators can be used to learn technical and non-technical skills and, to analyse posture. Ergonomic skill can be automatically detected with a Human Pose Estimation algorithm to help improve the surgeon’s work quality. The objective of this study was to analyse the postural behaviour of surgeons and identify expertise-dependent movements. Our hypothesis was that hesitation and the occurrence of surgical instruments interfering with movement (defined as interfering movements) decrease with expertise.Material and methodsSixty surgeons with three expertise levels (novice, intermediate, and expert) were recruited. During a training session using an arthroscopic simulator, each participant’s movements were video-recorded with an RGB camera. A modified OpenPose algorithm was used to detect the surgeon's joints. The detection frequency of each joint in a specific area was visualized with a heatmap-like approach and used to calculate a mobility score.ResultsThis analysis allowed quantifying surgical movements. Overall, the mean mobility score was 0.823, 0.816, and 0.820 for novice, intermediate and expert surgeons, respectively. The mobility score alone was not enough to identify postural behaviour differences. A visual analysis of each participants’ movements highlighted expertise-dependent interfering movements.Conclusion Video-recording and analysis of surgeon’s movements are a non-invasive approach to obtain quantitative and qualitative ergonomic information in order to provide feedback during training. Our findings suggest that the interfering movements do not decrease with expertise but differ in function of the surgeon’s level.
... Team centrality and team proximity are examples of behavioral metrics investigated in these studies ( Figure 2). [37][38][39] ...
Article
Full-text available
The tremendous and rapid technological advances that humans have achieved in the last decade have definitely impacted how surgical tasks are performed in the operating room (OR). As a high-tech work environment, the contemporary OR has incorporated novel computational systems into the clinical workflow, aiming to optimize processes and support the surgical team. Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly important for surgical decision making to help address diverse sources of information, such as patient risk factors, anatomy, disease natural history, patient values and cost, and assist surgeons and patients to make better predictions regarding the consequences of surgical decisions. In this review, we discuss the current initiatives that are using AI in cardiothoracic surgery and surgical care in general. We also address the future of AI and how high-tech ORs will leverage human-machine teaming to optimize performance and enhance patient safety.
Conference Paper
Background: Surgical procedures take place in high-risk and complex environments, where multiple specialized professionals work together to deliver effective care to patients. Therefore, teamwork is essential for the successful performance of open surgery or laparoscopic surgery. Team performance during a surgical procedure varies depending on the team’s work experience and cognitive demand on individual operation room (OR) personnel. Understanding team performance, therefore, is essential for establishing a more systematic mechanism for improving patient outcomes. Methods that are currently used to assess team performance in training laboratories and operating rooms, such as observational rating scales and team self-assessment suffer from significant shortcomings. Most existing methods focus on subjectively evaluating performance or utilizing an unstructured and descriptive approach. A number of promising quantitative methods have also been examined in recent studies to evaluate surgical team performance, including gesture detection using special cameras (e.g., the Kinect), body markers, wearable device sensors, and instrument tracking. These technologies are, however, difficult to implement in OR environments because of privacy and patient safety concerns. To address these challenges, this study proposes an innovative method for analyzing the performance of OR staff during procedures by estimating the position and movement of their bodies as captured in video data, without expert monitoring or using specialized technologies. Method: The proposed method is based on the OpenPose library and video data captured by standard cameras that are available in OR environments, without needing the attachment of makers or sensors to the OR staff. OpenPose is a posture-tracking algorithm employed to estimate the posture (keypoints) of multiple people from the images captured by a monocular camera using a convolutional neural network, which is a type of deep learning network. Following is a summary of the steps involved in using this method. Step 1: Position keypoint generation from recorded OR videos: As shown in Figure 1, after recording the video during the OR procedure, the OpenPose library can be used to identify the position of keypoints (17 keypoints) in OR staff’s body. Step 2: Position keypoint extraction: OpenPose creates JSON files for each frame containing all keypoint positions, which can be merged to produce a single file for all frames and persons. Step 3: Pre-processing position data: According to our previous studies, we suggest using only the neck keypoint (keypoint 1) during the pre-processing stage since changing the coordination of this keypoint resulted in higher accuracy in capturing whole body movements of a person. For more specific aspects of team movements, other keypoints can also be used individually or collectively. After dealing with outliers and missing data, the x and y coordinates of the neck keypoint are suggested to calculate the Euclidean distance between the neck and a reference point (x = 0, y = 0). The average displacement per frame in pixels (px) then can be calculated across all team members to capture the entire team motion. Step 4: Team displacement data analysis: Team displacement data measured in Step 3 can be analyzed using time-domain methods such as mean, median, standard deviation (SD), max, and min of team displacement data. This data can also be transferred to frequency-domain for further analysis using power spectral density to identify peak and frequency bands' statistics. Our previous studies have also shown that nonlinear methods such as Shannon entropy can be useful in evaluating team performance based on motion and physiological data. Use case study: We examined the feasibility of this approach by extracting OR team motion metrics from 30 videos from real-life cardiac surgery operations. Afterward, we explored the relationship between these metrics and non-technical skills (NTS). The metrics related to power spectral density and entropy were calculated to estimate the level of team organization and identify variations that may arise from a high cognitive load, medical errors, emergencies, or flow disruptions. We found that teams with non-technical scores exhibited significantly lower entropy in motion patterns, reflecting more consistent body motion during a critical cardiac surgery phase. Our study demonstrated that this methodology can be used as a feasible approach in understanding team performance based on metrics extracted from surgical video data using position estimation of OR personals with the OpenPose library. Figure 1. (Available but not allowed to submit by the submission portal)
Chapter
With the tremendous advances in technology and computational systems that occurred in the last three decades, we have integrated novel technologies in virtually all human activities, with the ultimate goal of improving performance and enhancing safety in the workplace. As a high-stakes, high-risk human activity, with increasing level of complexity, surgery has also incorporated computational systems to the clinical workflow in the operating room (OR) in order to optimize processes and support the surgical team. In the OR, cognition is extended outside individual team members’ minds toward the entire surgical team and, even further, throughout all human and nonhuman systems involved during surgery. In this chapter, we describe the foundations that underpin augmented cognition in the OR, as well as the existing evidence in this realm. Lastly, we discuss future implications and applications of cognitive augmentation in the surgical setting.
Article
Full-text available
By its very nature, much of teamwork is distributed across, and not stored within, interdependent people working toward a common goal. In this light, we advocate a systems perspective on teamwork that is based on general coordination principles that are not limited to cognitive, motor, and physiological levels of explanation within the individual. In this article, we present a framework for understanding and modeling teams as dynamical systems and review our empirical findings on teams as dynamical systems. We proceed by (a) considering the question of why study teams as dynamical systems, (b) considering the meaning of dynamical systems concepts (attractors; perturbation; synchronization; fractals) in the context of teams, (c) describe empirical studies of team coordination dynamics at the perceptual-motor, cognitive-behavioral, and cognitive-neurophysiological levels of analysis, and (d) consider the theoretical and practical implications of this approach, including new kinds of explanations of human performance and real-time analysis and performance modeling. Throughout our discussion of the topics we consider how to describe teamwork using equations and/or modeling techniques that describe the dynamics. Finally, we consider what dynamical equations and models do and do not tell us about human performance in teams and suggest future research directions in this area.
Article
Background: Surgeons in the operating theatre deal constantly with high-demand tasks that require simultaneous processing of a large amount of information. In certain situations, high cognitive load occurs, which may impact negatively on a surgeon's performance. This systematic review aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the different methods used to assess surgeons' cognitive load, and a critique of the reliability and validity of current assessment metrics. Methods: A search strategy encompassing MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, PsycINFO, ACM Digital Library, IEEE Xplore, PROSPERO and the Cochrane database was developed to identify peer-reviewed articles published from inception to November 2016. Quality was assessed by using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI). A summary table was created to describe study design, setting, specialty, participants, cognitive load measures and MERSQI score. Results: Of 391 articles retrieved, 84 met the inclusion criteria, totalling 2053 unique participants. Most studies were carried out in a simulated setting (59 studies, 70 per cent). Sixty studies (71 per cent) used self-reporting methods, of which the NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) was the most commonly applied tool (44 studies, 52 per cent). Heart rate variability analysis was the most used real-time method (11 studies, 13 per cent). Conclusion: Self-report instruments are valuable when the aim is to assess the overall cognitive load in different surgical procedures and assess learning curves within competence-based surgical education. When the aim is to assess cognitive load related to specific operative stages, real-time tools should be used, as they allow capture of cognitive load fluctuation. A combination of both subjective and objective methods might provide optimal measurement of surgeons' cognition.
Article
Objectives: To design a data collection methodology to capture team activities during robot-assisted surgery (RAS) (team communications, surgical flow, and procedural interruptions), and use relevant disciplines of Industrial Engineering and Human Factors Engineering to uncover key issues impeding surgical flow and guide evidence-based strategic changes to enhance surgical performance and improve outcomes. Design: Field study, to determine the feasibility of the proposed methodology. Setting: Recording the operating room (OR) environment during robot-assisted surgeries (RAS). The data collection system included recordings from the console and 3 aerial cameras, in addition to 8 lapel microphones (1 for each OR team member). Questionnaires on team familiarity and cognitive load were collected. Participants: In all, 37 patients and 89 OR staff members have consented to participate in the study. Results: Overall, 37 RAS procedures were recorded (130 console hours). A pilot procedure was evaluated in detail. We were able to characterize team communications in terms of flow, mode, topic, and form. Surgical flow was evaluated in terms of duration, location, personnel involved, purpose, and if movements were avoidable or not. Procedural interruptions were characterized according to their duration, cause, mode of communication, and personnel involved. Conclusion: This methodology allowed for the capture of a wide variety of team activities during RAS that would serve as a solid platform to improve nontechnical aspects of RAS.
Article
There is general enthusiasm for applying strategies from aviation directly to medical care; the application of the "sterile cockpit" rule to surgery has accordingly been suggested. An implicit prerequisite to the evidence-based transfer of such a concept to the clinical domain, however, is definition of periods of high mental workload analogous to takeoff and landing. We measured cognitive demands among operating room staff, mapped critical events, and evaluated protocol-driven communication. With the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index and semistructured focus groups, we identified common critical stages of cardiac surgical cases. Intraoperative communication was assessed before (n = 18) and after (n = 16) introduction of a structured communication protocol. Cognitive workload measures demonstrated high temporal diversity among caregivers in various roles. Eight critical events during cardiopulmonary bypass were then defined. A structured, unambiguous verbal communication protocol for these events was then implemented. Observations of 18 cases before implementation including 29.6 hours of cardiopulmonary bypass with 632 total communication exchanges (average 35.1 exchanges/case) were compared with observations of 16 cases after implementation including 23.9 hours of cardiopulmonary bypass with 748 exchanges (average 46.8 exchanges/case, P = .06). Frequency of communication breakdowns per case decreased significantly after implementation (11.5 vs 7.3 breakdowns/case, P = .008). Because of wide variations is cognitive workload among caregivers, effective communication can be structured around critical events rather than defined intervals analogous to the sterile cockpit, with reduction in communication breakdowns.
Article
To help ensure successful outcomes of open-heart surgery, surgeon and perfusionist must coordinate their activities during management of cardioplegia. This research aims to understand the basis for this coordination. We employed the framework of distributed cognition and the methodology of cognitive ethnography to describe how cognitive resources are configured and utilized to accomplish successful cardioplegia management. Analysis identified six types of surgeon-perfusionist verbal exchange which collectively enable robust system performance through (a) making the current situation clear and mutually understood; (b) making goals and envisioned future situations clear and thereby anticipated; and (c) expanding upon the activity system's knowledge base through discovery and sharing of experience. We argue for the "activity system" as the appropriate unit of analysis, and distributed cognition as a powerful theoretical framework for studying the socio-technical work of health care.