ArticlePDF Available

Chronic Overworking: Cause Extremely Negative Impact on Health and Quality of Life

Authors:
  • Chandigarh College of Technology

Abstract

INTRODUCTION
Int.J.Adv.Microbiol.Health.Res.2019; 3(1):11-15
11
International Journal of Advanced Microbiology and Health Research
ISSN: 2457-077X. Volume 3, Issue 1 (January-March 2019), PP. 11-15
Available online at www.ijamhr.com
Review Article
Chronic Overworking: Cause Extremely Negative Impact on
Health and Quality of Life
Bhairav Prasad1* and Charu Thakur2
1&2College of Health Science, Vidya Jyoti Institution, Derabssi, SAS Nagar -140508, Punjab, India
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
Work is an activity that organises and provides
meaning to the use of time in a society that has
programmed its rhythms as a function. It is
important in structuring daily life and in enabling a
sense of continuity, provides capital, satisfaction
that flourishing human life and his family. What’s
more, it is an antidote against boredom and
emptiness. There is no doubt that technology has
simplified the way we carry out our day-to-day
routines. The latest technology and advancement in
the work place do the thing easier and find the
solution of any problems and also inspire us to
work more. But some time the work become hell
for us. While being constantly plugged in work feel
safe, connected at office or home. It also means we
never really clock out. It is one thing to pull a long
day every once in a while to finish a project or deal
with a crisis, but it's another face to routinely stay
over time at the work place or work for extra time.
That is chronic overwork and it can have extremely
negative impacts on our health, happiness, and
overall quality of life. But now days over time has
been a routine part for many people. It is one of
those things everyone knows is bad for us, but no
one really listens. The extensive working in the
office or at home is bad for our health and also our
performance at work. The employees who expand
long time in work may experience more serious
complication including mental, physical and social
issue. Significant effects of chronic working
include stress, lack of free time, poor work-life
balance, relation hit and serious health risks [1, 2].
Employee performance levels could also be
lowered. Chronic working tendency or spending
long time at work place may lead exhaustion,
depression, low energy, and lack of attention,
irritation and anxiety [3].
As a result, of these factors the employee’s mental,
physical and social life affected significantly.
Received 21st February, 2019
Revised 28th February, 2019
Accepted 4th March, 2018
Published online 26th March, 2019
Overworking
Mental effects
Physical effects
Social effects
Article Info
Work is an action that organizes and provides meaning to the use of time in a society that
has programmed its rhythms as a function. It is important in structuring daily life and in
enabling a sense of continuity, provides capital, satisfaction that flourishing human life and
his family. What’s more, it is an antidote against boredom and emptiness. But it also
means we never really clock out while working and become too much workaholic. The
persistent overwork has extremely negative impacts on our health, happiness, and overall
quality of life. Nowadays working overtime has become the norm for most people. It is one
of those things everyone knows is bad for us, but no one really listens. Imbalance between
work and health or overwork not only bad for employees but also for employers. The long
working in the office or at home is bad for our health and our performance at work. A
person who expands more time in work may experience numerous health problems
including mental, physical and social problems. The Significant effects include stress, lack
of free time, poor work-life balance, relation hit and serious health risks lead to tiredness,
fatigue, obesity, lack of attentiveness, insomnia, depression, diabetes, high BP, Cerebro-
cardiovascular problem, etc.
Keywords
Int.J.Adv.Microbiol.Health.Res.2019; 3(1):11-15
12
HEALTH AND SAFETY
The direct link between over working and health
safety is still remaining unestablished. But some
studies have reported that due to over exertion at
work place the employees are tend to have addict of
some bad habit such as smoking, tobacco usage,
alcohol and use some psychotropic drugs that could
lead to health and psychological complications[4,
5].
It has been observed that working time 9-12 hours;
working timing exceeding 12 hours shown
significantly decreased cognitive testing
performance, work efficiency and increase work
place damage. A survey was conducted between
1987 and 2000 found that in a group of 10,793
male and female and 61% was associated with
excess of injury due overwork than compared to
jobs without overtime. The rate of injury was
directly proportional to the length of work time and
numbers of hours per week [5].
MENTAL EFFECTS
It has been also known that in every hour we need a
short brake to relax our mind. The long working
hour, the style of working and the type of work
adversely affect the central nervous system. A
study was conducted in July 2016 on the effects of
work and mental health. The result found that 38%
overwork, 46% never had time to relax and 60% of
them having unhealthy work-life balance may
suffered with various mental disorders [1].
Another study in 2004 shown that the workers in
Australia, trend that satisfaction levels decreased as
the number of hours worked increased. They also
suggested that the effect could be reversed by
decreasing the extensive working [6].
The Mental Component Summary (MCS) of (SF-
36) measure, they noted a 48% increased
probability regarding mental health decline in those
workers working 4959 hours per week, compared
with those below normal working time (that is, 35
40 hours per week).
The possibility amplified by 53% in those working
greater than 60 hours a week. It has also been
observed that and it is differing by gender. Among
those work for 49-59 hours per week, the SF-36
score was lower among women than men. [7].
The overworking style leads to many mental issue
including lower working satisfaction, blue mind
(mind fullness), stress, depression, mood swing,
irritability and anxiety [8].
Suicidal ideation is another concern for overtime
work. A research was conducted in South Korea
recruited 67,471 workers, and the results shown
30% higher suicidal ideation among workers
having working hours more than 60 hours. The
ratio of increasing tendency 31% and 33% in male
and female workers respectively. There was also
increased suicidal ideation noted among workers
working for 5160 hours per week in both males
and females [9].
PHYSICAL EFFECTS
Continuous and prolonged working, lack of breaks
during the day, and consecutive days of working
without a day off lead to decreased efficiency and
productivity in workers. The abnormal work and
sleep schedules were leading serious health issue.
A study was conducted by The University of Texas
Health Science Center at Houston shown the link
between overtime and the increased risk of
cardiovascular disorder (CVD) [5].
In addition to these other health risks is the
correlation between working long hours and the
likelihood of individuals smoking, drinking, having
a high body mass index (BMI), and being less
physically active [10].
The long-term effects of alcohol consumption
include increased on-the-job injuries and loss of
productivity, family problems, risk of high blood
pressure, stroke, other cardiovascular diseases, and
more [11].
The effects of smoking, in addition to similarities
of the effects of alcohol, include increased risk of
heart attacks, weight gain, obesity, emphysema, and
a large amount of cancers [12].
A research was conducted in Osaka, Japan, and on
effect of long working hours and hypertension and
surveyed 941 male Japanese workers are found
with elevated level of blood pressure [13].
Another coherent study shown that 55 or more
hours per week to look for an association of
developing Type II Diabetes compared to a referent
Int.J.Adv.Microbiol.Health.Res.2019; 3(1):11-15
13
group of workers only working 3540 hours per
week. They have been found that there was
significant evidence for link between long working
hours and developing Type II Diabetes, even after
adjusting physical activity, smoking and alcohol
use[10, 14].
Another data of 85,494 workers from several
European countries screened and found that the
effect of long working hours with developing
partial fibrillation [15].
There was also evidence of the overburden has
been known as a cause of sudden death from
cerebrovascular and cardiovascular diseases
(CCVD) as well as a cause of permanent disability
or sickness caused by CCVD [ 16,17].
Therefore, CCVD is now documented as an
occupational disease. A study was conducted by
Buell and Breslow in 1960, reported that extended
working hours increased the risk of death from
coronary health diseases among males in the United
States [18].
Long working hours may pull the employees to
some bad habit such as smoking, high coffee
intake; alcohol, unhealthy diet, and lack of physical
activity. Change of this life style triggers the risk
factors for CCVD, such as high blood pressure,
stroke and rise in cholesterol and triglycerides level
in body and some other type of cancer too [19, 20].
FAMILY AND SOCIAL EFFECTS
Balance between work and life is an integral aspect
of employees life. Naturally, the more hours
someone works, the less time they will have to
spend with their family or other leisure activities. In
2007, a study was conducted at Penn State
Abington analyzed the tradeoff between working
overtime and home and family life activities. A
major finding was that workers struggled to take
time off for personal or family needs. However, the
additional income from working long hours could
limit the actual impact of this loss of time [21, 22].
More specifically, the impact of having a child
exponentially increased the impact of working
overtime. Especially at a young age, it is very
important in child development for the parents to be
involved to provide care and positive experiences.
Due to this reason, work-life conflicts arise much
more frequently for parents, as stress levels and
family conflicts are heightened. These effects are
even worse for single parents [23, 24].
REPRODUCTIVE EFFECTS
Over working or night shifts working adversely
affect women of middle age particularly child
bearing age. The extended work/night shift work
cause conflicts in the family and stress probably
cause the disruption of the menstrual cycle. The
stress and depression may link with the increased
risk of spontaneous abortion, miscarriage, low birth
weight and prematurity [25].
CONCLUSION
Chronic and long working or abnormal day night
schedule in the work exposes employees to severe
health issues. The key consequences of chronic
working may disrupt the biological rhythm of the
body and can have significant effects on work
efficiency, sleep patterns, mental health,
psychological or behavioral changes, stress,
depression, Type II Diabetes, reproductive
outcome, obesity, hypertension and developing
cerebro-cardiovascular complications.
REFERENCES
1. Karsten, S. (2016). "Survey: Too Much Work,
Too Much Stress?” Forbes. 10-21.
2. Conway, S., Pompeii, L., Roberts, Follis, R.
and Gimeno, D. (2016). "Press Releases |
Long Work Hours Linked to Higher
Cardiovascular Disease Risk".
www.acoem.org. Retrieved 2016-10-21.
3. Bryan, V., Dennis, K., Gregory M. and
Melissa R. (2000). "Evaluating the Effects of
Fatigue on Police Patrol Officers: Final
Report". ncjrs.gov. NCJRS.
4. Caruso, C. (2004). "Overtime and extended
work shifts: Recent Findings on Illnesses,
Injuries, and Health Behaviors". Semantic
Scholar.
5. Dembe, A (2005). "The impact of overtime
and long work hours on occupational injuries
and illnesses: new evidence from the United
States". The BMJ.
6. Matthew, G., Lixia, Q., David, S. and Ruth
W. (June 2004). "Long Work Hours and the
Wellbeing of Fathers and their Families".
curtin. edu. Australian Journal of Labour
Economics. 23-37.
Int.J.Adv.Microbiol.Health.Res.2019; 3(1):11-15
14
7. Allison, M. Peter, S. and LaMontagne, A. D.
(2015). "Working hours and mental health in
Australia: evidence from an Australian
population-based cohort, 20012012". Occup
Environ Med. 72 (8): 573579.
doi:10.1136/oemed-2014-102791. ISSN
1351-0711. PMID 26101295.
8. Virtanen, M., Ferrie, J. E., Singh-Manoux, A.,
Shipley, M. J., Stansfeld, S. A., Marmot, M.
G., Ahola, K., Vahtera, J. and Kivimaki, M.
(2011). "Long working hours and symptoms
of anxiety and depression: a 5-year follow-up
of the Whitehall II study". Psychological
Medicine. 41 (12): 24852494.
doi:10.1017/S0033291711000171. ISSN
1469-8978.
9. Chang-Gyo, Y., Kyu-Jung B., Mo-Yeol K.
and Jin-Ha Y. (2015). "Is suicidal ideation
linked to working hours and shift work in
Korea?". Journal of Occupational Health. 57
(3): 222229. doi:10.1539/joh.14-0237-OA.
10. Mika et al., (2015). "Long working hours,
socioeconomic status, and the risk of incident
type 2 diabetes; a meta-analysis of published
and unpublished data from 222 120
individuals". The Lancet Diabetes &
Endocrinology. 3 (1): 2734.
doi:10.1016/S2213-8587(14)70178-0. PMC
4286814 . PMID 25262544.
11. Buxton, O. et al. (2015). "Long working
hours can be toxic". The Lancet Diabetes &
Endocrinology. 3 (1): 34.
doi:10.1016/S2213-8587(14)70201-3. PMID
25262543.
12. Kivimaki, Mika et al. (2017). "Long working
hours as a risk factor for atrial fibrillation: a
multi-cohort study". European Heart Journal.
38 (34): 26212628.
doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehx324. PMID
28911189.
13. Nakanishi, N., Yoshida, H., Nagano, K.,
Kawashimo, H., Nakamura, K. and Tatara, K.
(2001). Long Working Hours and Risk for
Hypertension in Japanese Male White Collar
Workers. Japan: Journal of Epidemiology and
Community Health. pp. 316322.
14. Dermot O. and Michael, R. (2013). "Worked
to death? A census-based longitudinal study
of the relationship between the numbers of
hours spent working and mortality risk".
International Journal of Epidemiology. 42 (6):
18201830. doi:10.1093/ije/dyt211.
15. Iwasaki, Kenji et al. (March 2006). "Health
Problems due to Long Working Hours in
Japan: Working Hours, Worker's
Compensation (Karoshi), and Preventive
Measures". Industrial Health. 44: 537540.
doi:10.2486/indhealth.44.537.
16. Occupational Safety and Health
Administration, Ministry of Labor & Taiwan.
Guideline for the recognition of work-induced
cerebrovascular and cardiovascular diseases
(excluding diseases caused by external
traumatic factors),
https://www.osha.gov.tw/1106/1113/1114/10
053/ (2016).
17. Eguchi H, Wada K,. and Smith DR.(2016).
Recognition, compensation, and prevention of
karoshi, or death due to overwork. J Occup
Environ Med.58:e313314. doi:
10.1097/JOM.0000000000000797.
18. Buell, P. and L. Breslow.(1960). Mortality
from coronary heart disease in California men
who work long hours. J Chronic Dis. 11:615
626. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(60)90060-6.
19. van der Hulst M. (2003)Long workhours and
health. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health.;
29:171188. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.720.
20. Labor Standards Bureau, Ministry of Health
& Labour and Welfare. Recognition standards
for cerebrovascular diseases, ischemic hear
diseases, etc. (excluding those attributable to
injuries). Notice No. 1063, issued on 12
December 2001, http://www.mhlw.go.jp/new-
info/kobetu/roudou/gyousei/rousai/dl/040325-
11a.
21. Vila, B. (2000). Tired Cops: The Importance
of Managing Police Fatigue. Police Executive
Research Forum; 1st edition. ISBN
1878734679.
22. Lawton, L. and Tulkin, D. (2010). "Work-
Family Balance, Family Structure and
Family-Friendly Employer Programs".
princeton.edu. Retrieved October 26, 2016.
23. Virtanen, M. et al. (2012). "Long working
hours and Coronary Heart Disease: A
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis".
American Journal of Epidemiology. 176:
586596. doi:10.1093/aje/kws139.
24. Kivimaki, Mika et al. (October 2015). "Long
working hours and risk of coronary heart
disease and stroke: a systematic review and
meta-analysis of published and unpublished
data for 603,838 individuals". The Lancet.
Int.J.Adv.Microbiol.Health.Res.2019; 3(1):11-15
15
386: 17391746. doi:10.1016/S0140-
6736(15)60295-1. PMID 26298822.
25. Waterhouse, J. M., Folkard, S. and Minors,
D.S. (1978). Shift work, health and safety An
overview of the scientific literature. London:
The Stationery Office, 1992:131.
How to cite this article:
Prasad B and Thakur C. Chronic Overworking: Cause Extremely Negative Impact on Health and
Quality of Life. Int. J. Adv. Microbiol.Health.Res., 2019; 3(1):11-15.
Source of Financial Support: Nil, Conflict of interest: Nil.
Corresponding Author: Bhairav Prasad
Assistant Professor, College of Health Science, Vidya Jyoti
Institution, Derabassi, SAS Nagar -140508, Punjab, India.
E-mail: bhairavmicro@gmail.com
Fig.1: Effects of overwork
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any citations for this publication.
Article
Full-text available
Background: Long working hours might increase the risk of cardiovascular disease, but prospective evidence is scarce, imprecise, and mostly limited to coronary heart disease. We aimed to assess long working hours as a risk factor for incident coronary heart disease and stroke. / Methods: We identified published studies through a systematic review of PubMed and Embase from inception to Aug 20, 2014. We obtained unpublished data for 20 cohort studies from the Individual-Participant-Data Meta-analysis in Working Populations (IPD-Work) Consortium and open-access data archives. We used cumulative random-effects meta-analysis to combine effect estimates from published and unpublished data. / Findings: We included 25 studies from 24 cohorts in Europe, the USA, and Australia. The meta-analysis of coronary heart disease comprised data for 603 838 men and women who were free from coronary heart disease at baseline; the meta-analysis of stroke comprised data for 528 908 men and women who were free from stroke at baseline. Follow-up for coronary heart disease was 5·1 million person-years (mean 8·5 years), in which 4768 events were recorded, and for stroke was 3·8 million person-years (mean 7·2 years), in which 1722 events were recorded. In cumulative meta-analysis adjusted for age, sex, and socioeconomic status, compared with standard hours (35–40 h per week), working long hours (≥55 h per week) was associated with an increase in risk of incident coronary heart disease (relative risk [RR] 1·13, 95% CI 1·02–1·26; p=0·02) and incident stroke (1·33, 1·11–1·61; p=0·002). The excess risk of stroke remained unchanged in analyses that addressed reverse causation, multivariable adjustments for other risk factors, and different methods of stroke ascertainment (range of RR estimates 1·30–1·42). We recorded a dose–response association for stroke, with RR estimates of 1·10 (95% CI 0·94–1·28; p=0·24) for 41–48 working hours, 1·27 (1·03–1·56; p=0·03) for 49–54 working hours, and 1·33 (1·11–1·61; p=0·002) for 55 working hours or more per week compared with standard working hours (ptrend<0·0001). / Interpretation: Employees who work long hours have a higher risk of stroke than those working standard hours; the association with coronary heart disease is weaker. These findings suggest that more attention should be paid to the management of vascular risk factors in individuals who work long hours. / Funding: Medical Research Council, Economic and Social Research Council, European Union New and Emerging Risks in Occupational Safety and Health research programme, Finnish Work Environment Fund, Swedish Research Council for Working Life and Social Research, German Social Accident Insurance, Danish National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Academy of Finland, Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment (Netherlands), US National Institutes of Health, British Heart Foundation.
Article
Full-text available
Aims: Studies suggest that people who work long hours are at increased risk of stroke, but the association of long working hours with atrial fibrillation, the most common cardiac arrhythmia and a risk factor for stroke, is unknown. We examined the risk of atrial fibrillation in individuals working long hours (≥55 per week) and those working standard 35-40 h/week. Methods and results: In this prospective multi-cohort study from the Individual-Participant-Data Meta-analysis in Working Populations (IPD-Work) Consortium, the study population was 85 494 working men and women (mean age 43.4 years) with no recorded atrial fibrillation. Working hours were assessed at study baseline (1991-2004). Mean follow-up for incident atrial fibrillation was 10 years and cases were defined using data on electrocardiograms, hospital records, drug reimbursement registers, and death certificates. We identified 1061 new cases of atrial fibrillation (10-year cumulative incidence 12.4 per 1000). After adjustment for age, sex and socioeconomic status, individuals working long hours had a 1.4-fold increased risk of atrial fibrillation compared with those working standard hours (hazard ratio = 1.42, 95% CI = 1.13-1.80, P = 0.003). There was no significant heterogeneity between the cohort-specific effect estimates (I2 = 0%, P = 0.66) and the finding remained after excluding participants with coronary heart disease or stroke at baseline or during the follow-up (N = 2006, hazard ratio = 1.36, 95% CI = 1.05-1.76, P = 0.0180). Adjustment for potential confounding factors, such as obesity, risky alcohol use and high blood pressure, had little impact on this association. Conclusion: Individuals who worked long hours were more likely to develop atrial fibrillation than those working standard hours.
Article
Full-text available
This paper assesses the impact of working less than or more than standard full-time hours on mental health, as well as possible differences in this relationship by gender and skill level. The study design was a longitudinal cohort with 12 annual waves of data collection over the period 2001-2012, yielding a sample of 90 637 observations from 18 420 people. Fixed effects within-person regression was used to control for time invariant confounding. The Mental Component Summary of the Short Form 36 (SF-36) measure was used as the primary outcome measure. Working hours over the preceding year was measured in five categories with standard full-time hours (35-40 h/week) as the reference. Results indicated that when respondents were working 49-59 h (-0.52, 95% CI -0.74 to -0.29, p<0.001) and 60 h or more (-0.47, 95% CI -0.77 to -0.16, p=0.003) they had worse mental health than when they were working 35-40 h/week (reference). The difference in mental health when working 49-59 h was greater for women than for men. There were greater declines in mental health in relation to longer working hours among persons in higher compared to lower occupational skill levels. Study results suggest the need for employers and governments to regulate working hours to reduce the burden of mental ill health in the working population. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Article
Full-text available
Objective: This study attempted to use the community health survey (CHS) to identify the effect of long working hours (long WHs) and night/shift work on suicidal ideation among the employed population of Korea. Methods: This study used data from 67,471 subjects who were administered the 2008 CHS which obtained information regarding sociodemographic characteristics, health behaviors and working environment, using structured questionnaires and personal interviews. We adopted multiple logistic regression models for gender and employment stratification. Results: Among male employees, suicidal ideation was significantly associated with only moderately long WHs (51-60 hours), after controlling covariates (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.30; 95% confidence interval [95%CI], 1.07 to 1.57). Self-employed/male employer populations had higher suicidal ideation when they had moderately long WHs (aOR, 1.23; 95%CI, 1.01 to 1.50) and very long WHs (over 60 hours) (aOR, 1.31; 95%CI, 1.08 to 1.59). Among the female population, suicidal ideation was significantly association with moderately long WHs in the employee group (aOR, 1.31; 95%CI, 1.08 to 1.58) and moderately (aOR, 1.35; 95%CI, 1.08 to 1.69) and very (aOR, 1.33; 95%CI, 1.07 to 1.65) long WHs in the self-employed/employer group. Shift work was a significant predictor only in the female population in the employee groups (aOR, 1.45; 95%CI, 1.23 to 1.70). Conclusions: Long WHs and shift work were associated with suicidal ideation when taking into account gender and employment differences. The harmful effects of exceptionally long WHs in Korea, among other Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries, raise concerns about public and occupational health. To address the issue of long WHs, labor policies that reduce maximum working hours and facilitate job stability are needed.(J Occup Health 2015; 57: 222-229).
Article
Full-text available
There has been an increasing interest in the health effects of long working hours, but little empirical evidence to substantiate early case series suggesting an increased mortality risk. The aim of the current study is to quantify the mortality risk associated with long working hours and to see if this varies by employment relations and conditions of occupation. A census-based longitudinal study of 414 949 people aged 20-59/64 years, working at least 35 h/week, subdivided into four occupational classes (managerial/professional, intermediate, own account workers, workers in routine occupations) with linkage to deaths records over the following 8.7 years. Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine all-cause and cause-specific mortality risk. Overall 9.4% of the cohort worked 55 or more h/week, but this proportion was greater in the senior management and professional occupations and in those who were self-employed. Analysis of 4447 male and 1143 female deaths showed that hours worked were associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality only for men working for more than 55 or more h/week in routine/semi-routine occupations [adjusted hazard ratios (adjHR) 1.31: 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11, 1.55] compared with their peers working 35-40 h/week. Their equivalent risk of death from cardiovascular disease was (adjHR 1.49: 95% CI 1.10, 2.00). These findings substantiate and add to the earlier studies indicating the deleterious impact of long working hours but also suggest that the effects are moderated by employment relations or conditions of occupation. The policy implications of these findings are discussed.
Article
Work is an action that organizes and provides meaning to the use of time in a society that has programmed its rhythms as a function. It is important in structuring daily life and in enabling a sense of continuity, provides capital, satisfaction that flourishing human life and his family. What’s more, it is an antidote against boredom and emptiness. But it also means we never really clock out while working and become too much workaholic. The persistent overwork has extremely negative impacts on our health, happiness, and overall quality of life. Nowadays working overtime has become the norm for most people. It is one of those things everyone knows is bad for us, but no one really listens. Imbalance between work and health or overwork not only bad for employees but also for employers. The long working in the office or at home is bad for our health and our performance at work. A person who expands more time in work may experience numerous health problems including mental, physical and social problems. The Significant effects include stress, lack of free time, poor work-life balance, relation hit and serious health risks lead to tiredness, fatigue, obesity, lack of attentiveness, insomnia, depression, diabetes, high BP, Cerebrocardiovascular problem, etc.
Book
Police fatigue is a common and potentially lethal problem that largely has been ignored until recently. In Tired Cops, Bryan Vila, Ph.D., a prominent police researcher with 17 years of law enforcement experience, reports important findings from his NIJ-sponsored research with the Police Executive Research Forum (PERF) on police fatigue. Vila explores potential links between fatigue and officer accidents, injuries, illnesses and misconduct. The PERF publication, supported by the National Sleep Foundation, also provides police executives with the background they need to start managing fatigue, and gives officers and their families insight into this long overlooked occupational hazard. This book is recommended for agencies reviewing their shift work, overtime and other problems exacerbated by the events of September 11, 2001. (less)