PosterPDF Available

Meaning of Work: A culture based approach towards the construction of a German questionnaire

Authors:

Abstract

The significance of Meaning of Work (MOW) has been established for over 30 years. Various studies have shown its strong connection to most of the important organizational outcomes. But as research progresses, examples mount that contrary to original beliefs, MOW does not appear to be culturally independent. Despite this, only few research exists specifically examining MOW and its mechanisms in Germany.
Examination
of Convergent and Divergent Validity
SiA S B G AFW AME PN PA CBB UWES JS WAMI
SiA
1.00
0.88***
0.81***
0.84***
-0.27***
-0.09 0.07
0.59***
0.40***
0.55***
0.58***
0.70***
Self-Actualization (S)
0.88***
1.00
0.58***
0.63***
-0.36***
-0.10 0.08
0.64***
0.40***
0.63***
0.64***
0.58***
Belongingness (B)
0.81***
0.58***
1.00
0.49***
-0.14***
-0.05 0.09
0.37***
0.22***
0.35***
0.39***
0.43***
Sense of achieving goals (G)
0.84***
0.63***
0.49***
1.00 -0.13 -0.07 0.02
0.47***
0.37***
0.41***
0.44***
0.67***
Divergent
Validity
Alienation from work (AFW) [8]
-0.27***
-0.36***
-0.14***
-0.13 1.00 / / / / / / -0.12
Work securing existence (AME) [9] -0.09 -0.10 -0.05 -0.07 / 1.00 -0.03 -0.08 -0.02 -0.08 -0.04 /
PANAS: Negative Affect (NA) [10] 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.02 / -0.03 1.00 0.05 -0.05 0.09
0.17***
/
Convergent
Validity
PANAS: Positive Affect (PA) [10]
0.59***
0.64***
0.37***
0.47***
/ -0.08 0.05 1.00
0.49***
0.80***
0.65***
/
Commitment (CBB) [11]
0.40***
0.40***
0.22***
0.37***
/ -0.02 -0.05
0.49***
1.00
0.45***
0.47***
/
Engagement (UWES) [12]
0.55***
0.63***
0.35***
0.41***
/ -0.08 0.09
0.80***
0.45***
1.00 0.70 /
Job Satisfaction (JS) [13]
0.58***
0.64***
0.39***
0.44***
/ -0.04
0.17***
0.65***
0.47***
0.70***
1.00***
/
WAMI [14]
0.70***
0.58***
0.43***
0.67***
-0.12 / / / / / / 1.00
Meaning of Work:
A culture-based approach towards
the construction of a German questionnaire
Maximilian Feser, Timo Lorenz, Elisabeth Mainz
Contact: Maximilian Feser
M.Sc. Social- Organisational- and Economicspsychology, Freie Universität Berlin
Mail: max93feser@zedat.fu-berlin.de
The significance of Meaning of Work (MOW) has been established for over 30 years [1] . Various studies have shown its strong connection to most of the important organizational
outcomes [2] . But as research progresses, examples mount that contrary to original beliefs, MOW does not appear to be culturally independent [3]. Despite this, only few research
exists specifically examining MOW and its mechanisms in Germany [4].
In this study, a German questionnaire is constructed and validated. Both qualitative interviews conducted by its pre-study [5] and various theoretical foundations are integrated,
with Rosso et al.s [2] MOW mechanisms and the Cognitive-Experiential Self-Theory[6] forming the model´s core components.
1. MOW International Research Team. (1987). The meaning of working. London, UK: Academic Press.
2. Rosso, B. D., Dekas, K. H., & Wrzesniewski, A. (2010). On the meaning of work: A theoretical integration and review. Research in Organizational Behavior, 30, 91-127.
3. Arnoux-Nicolas, C., Sovet, L., Lhotellier, L., & Bernaud, J.-L. (2017). Development and validation of the meaning of work inventory among french workers. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 17(2),
165- 185.
4. Hardering, F., Will-Zocholl, M., & Hofmeister, H. (2015). Sinn der Arbeit und sinnvolle Arbeit: Zur Einführung. Arbeit, 24(1-2), 3-12.
5. Feser, M., Radau, L., & Siegling, M. (2017). Auf der Suche nach dem Sinn: Entwicklung eines deutschsprachigen Fragebogens zur Messung von Sinn in der Arbeit. Unveröffentlichte Arbeit. Freie Universität Berlin.
6. Epstein, S. (1985). The Implications of Cognitive-Experiential Self-Theory for Research in Social Psychology and Personality. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour. 15(3). 283-310.
7. Hu, L. t., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.
8. Fischer, A., & Kohr, H. (2014a). Entfremdung von der Arbeit. Zusammenstellung soziwalwissenschaftlicher Items und Skalen. Retrieved from: http://zis.gesis.org/skala/Fischer-Kohr-Entfremdung-von-der-Arbeit (24.05.2019)
9. Fischer, A., & Kohr, H. (2014b). Arbeit als Mittel der Existenzsicherung. Zusammenstellung soziwalwissenschaftlicher Items und Skalen. Retrieved from: http://zis.gesis.org/skala/Fischer-Kohr-Arbeit-als-Mittel-
derExistenzsicherung (24.05.2019)
10. Janke, S. & Glöckner-Rist, A. (2014). Deutsche Version der Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). Zusammenstellung sozialwissenschaftlicher Items und Skalen. Retrieved from: https://zis.gesis.org/skala/Janke-
Gl%C3%B6ckner-Rist-Deutsche-Version-der-Positive-and-Negative-Affect-Schedule-(PANAS) (24.05.2019)
11. Felfe, J., Six, B., Schmook, R., & Knorz, C. (2014). Commitment Organisation, Beruf und Beschäftigungsform (COBB). Zusammenstellung sozialwissenschaftlicher Items und Skalen. Retrieved from:
http://zis.gesis.org/ZisApplication/title/Commitment%20Organisation,%20Ber uf%20und%20Beschäftigungsform%20(COBB) (24.05.2019)
12. Sautier, L. P., Scherwath, A., Weis, J., Sarkar, S., Bosbach, M., Schendel, M.,…Mehnert, A. (2015). Erfassung von Arbeitsengagement bei Patienten mit hämatologischen Malignomen: Die psychometrischen Eigenschaften der
deutschen Version der Utrecht Work Engagement Scale 9 (UWES-9). Die Rehabilitation, 54(5), 297-303.
13. Judge, T. A., Boudreau, J. W., & Bretz, R. D. (1994). Job and life attitudes of male executives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 767-782.
14. Steger, M. F., Dik, B. J., & Duffy, R. D. (2012). Measuring meaningful work: The work and meaning inventory (WAMI). Journal of Career Assessment, 20(3), 322-337.
15. Trust in Talent Warum mitarbeiteroriente Unternehmen erfolgreicher sind. Talent Management Studie 2018. (2018). Retrieved from:
http://assets.kienbaum.com/downloads/Talent_Managment_Studie_2018_Kienbaum_Trust_in_Talent.pdf?mtime=20180205143550 (24.05.2019)
16. Neue Spielregeln im digitalen Zeitalter. Globale Human Capital Trendstudie 2017. (2017). Retrieved from: https://www2.deloitte.com/de/de/pages/humancapital/articles/human-capital-trends-deutschland-2017.html
(24.05.2019).
The Scale
Self-Actualization (S)
I can achieve self-actualization at work.
My work complies with my beliefs.
I experience success at work.
I completely merge into my work.
Belongingness (B)
I share my values with the people at work.
I identify with the people at work.
I like to spend time with the people at work.
It is customary that the people at work help each other.
Sense of achieving goals (G)
Iam aware of my works benefits for me personally.
I perceive my work as contributing to society.
My work is highly regarded by society.
My work has a positive impact on others.
Discussion
Both samples´data fit with the proposed model. Congruent validity is achieved for all surveyed scales. Divergent validity on the other hand can only be observed for one of the constructs (AFW),
even though not for all three factors. This needs to be addressed in further research, but part of this might be due to different definitions of MOW between the scales and this study.
Furthermore, an even distribution of industrial sectors could not be achieved in both samples, with social, educational and administrative personnel forming the majority in both. This might bias
the outcome, as it needs yet to be examined in Germany to what degree a job and its requirements and tasks impact the way in which individuals sense meaning in their work.
What gives work meaning is highly subjective and therefore dependent on an individual´s surrounding culture. At a time when lack of qualified personnel and employee-fluctuation form two of
the most acute challenges for the economy [15] [16], MOW represents an efficient way of determining the employee-work-fit. Recruiting and binding those, who experience MOW, will be crucial for
businesses and researchers therefore need to provide a solid and culture-based understanding of the underlying mechanisms.
Background
Method
A total of 521 persons were surveyed. Exclusion of all with <20 weekly hours resulted in the following
samples:
Sample one (n= 236): consisted of 135 women and 1 diverse, averaging at 42.11 years of age (SD =
12.71). 79.2% listed as employed, 11.0% as self-employed. At their momentary job, participants have
spent 0 to 40 years (MJob = 8.60 years, SD = 8.83), working on average 39.39 hours a week (SD = 8.51). The
social sector (31.78%) and administrative/ juristic sector (22.45%) make up half of the sample, with the
duration ranging from 0 to 45 years (MSector = 15.98 years, SD = 11.89).
Sample two (n= 259) consisted of 158 women and 1 diverse, averaging at 39.26 years of age (SD = 12.19).
70.66% listed as employed, 23.17% as government officials. At their momentary job, participants have
spent 1 to 46 years (MJob = 10.39 years, SD = 9.94), working on average 40.39 hours a week (SD = 10.75).
52.12% of all people surveyed work in the social sector, with the duration ranging from 0 to 45 years
(MSector = 15.98 years, SD = 11.89).
The first sample aimed at verifying the proposed three-factorial structure by applying a CFA. Model fit was
analysed in accordance with Hu & Bentler [7].A correlational analysis is conducted to examine the
questionnaires validity based on sample 2 (except AFW and WAMI, which where part of sample 1 to even
the total amount of items per survey).
Results I: Structural Equation Model
0.43
MOW
SB G
s1
0.31
s3
0.64
s2
0.41
s4
0.32
b5
0.33
b6
0.42
b7
0.57
b8
0.68
g9
0.62
g10
0.62
g11
0.75
g12
0.42
0.770.83 0.60 0.82 0.760.82 0.66 0.56 0.620.61 0.50 0.76
0.76 0.760.76
0.43 0.43
Data is based on sample 1. Model fit can be assumed as χ2(53) = 53 is not significant with p = 0.19. Model fit
was replicated with sample 2 and a combined sample. Note: * p 0.05; ** p0.01; *** p 0.001.
19th Congress of The European Association for Work & Organizational Psychology
Turin, ITALY, 29th May 1st June 2019
Results II: Correlational Analysis
... Meaning of work is typically conceptualized as significance, broader purpose, and self-actualization (Martela and Pessi, 2018). Others have defined it as self-actualization, belongingness, and sense of achieving goals (Feser et al., 2019). Microaggressions are established to have a negative impact on subjective feelings of competence at the workplace Fiske, 1996, 2001) and organizational commitment . ...
... Meaning of work was measured with a German meaning of work scale (SiA, for "meaning of work" in German; Feser et al., 2019). The SiA included three dimensions of meaning of work: selfrealization, belongingness, and justification. ...
Article
Full-text available
Gender microaggressions, especially its subtler forms microinsults and microinvalidations are by definition hard to discern. We aim to construct and validate a scale reflecting two facets of the microaggression taxonomy: microinsults and microinvalidations toward women in the workplace, the MIMI-16. Two studies were conducted (N1 = 500, N2 = 612). Using a genetic algorithm, a 16-item scale was developed and consequently validated via confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) in three separate validation samples. Correlational analyses with organizational outcome measures were performed. The MIMI-16 exhibits good model fit in all validation samples (CFI = 0.936-0.960, TLI = 0.926-0.954, RMSEA = 0.046-0.062, SRMR = 0.042-0.049). Multigroup-CFA suggested strict measurement invariance between all validation samples. Correlations were as expected and indicate internal and external validity. Scholars on gender microaggressions have mostly used qualitative research. With the newly developed MIMI-16 we provide a reliable and valid quantitative instrument to measure gender microaggressions in the workplace.
Article
Full-text available
The purpose of this study was to validate a psychometric instrument among French workers for assessing the meaning of work. Following an empirical framework, a two-step procedure consisted of exploring and then validating the scale among distinctive samples. The consequent Meaning of Work Inventory is a 15-item scale based on a four-factor model, and assesses the importance, understanding, direction, and purpose of work. The results indicate that this instrument is reliable for assessing the meaning of work in the French context. Implications for career counseling practices are discussed.
Article
Full-text available
Wenn gegenwärtig die moderne Arbeitswelt in öffentlichen Debatten und medi- alen Berichten thematisiert wird, stehen häufig die geschwächte Bindung von Beschäftigten zur Arbeit, die Verdichtung von Arbeit und die hohen Raten von Burnout-Erkrankungen im Mittelpunkt. Seit einigen Jahren lässt sich beobach- ten, dass nicht länger nur über die Zunahme von Arbeitsbelastungen oder die Intensivierung von Arbeit diskutiert wird, sondern eine grundsätzlichere Frage aufgeworfen wird, die Frage nach der Sinnhaftigkeit von Arbeit. Portraits in Wirtschaftsmagazinen über Berufswechslerinnen und -wechsler, die auf der Suche nach sinnvoller Arbeit ihren alten Beruf kündigen, oder Dossiers über den Sinn in der Arbeitswelt zeugen von einem neu entflammten Interesse an Fragen des Sinns.1 Die Arbeitswelt steht laut diesen Berichten unter Sinnlosig- keitsverdacht2: Für viele Beschäftigte dränge sich mehr und mehr die Frage nach dem Sinn ihres Tuns auf. Doch woher kommt dieses neue Interesse an Fragen des Sinns in der Arbeit? Ist die Ursache in einer tiefgreifenden Sinnkrise der Arbeitswelt zu sehen? Mangelt es den Beschäftigten in Deutschland an sinnvoller Arbeit?
Article
Full-text available
Despite executives' important positions in organizations, their attitudes have not received much research attention. To remedy this deficiency, the authors tested a hypothesized model of executive attitudes involving job satisfaction, life satisfaction, job stress, and work-family conflict. Using data from a large, representative sample of male executives (because of the small number of female executives in the study, the analyses were confined to men), the authors obtained LISREL results indicating support for the overall model and the specific relationships within the model. These results--the first to simultaneously consider job satisfaction, life satisfaction, job stress, and work-family conflict--constitute the most comprehensive evidence to date on executive attitudes. The meaning and contributions of the findings are discussed.
Article
The meaning of work literature is the product of a long tradition of rich inquiry spanning many disciplines. Yet, the field lacks overarching structures that would facilitate greater integration, consistency, and understanding of this body of research. Current research has developed in ways that have created relatively independent domains of study that exist in silos organized around various sources of meaning and meaningfulness. In this paper, we review the meaning of work literature in order to propose new frameworks within which to classify existing work and to seed new work. Our review is organized by the major sources of the meaning of work on which extant research has focused, and by the mechanisms through which work is proposed to become meaningful. We analyze the evolution and current state of meaning of work research, identifying core patterns and assumptions that have defined research in this area to date, and offer a theoretical framework based on this body of research that illuminates the main pathways to meaningful work. Throughout, we outline several promising directions for future research that we hope will stimulate further generative inquiry in this rich area of study.
The meaning of working
MOW International Research Team. (1987). The meaning of working. London, UK: Academic Press.
Auf der Suche nach dem Sinn: Entwicklung eines deutschsprachigen Fragebogens zur Messung von Sinn in der Arbeit
  • M Feser
  • L Radau
  • M Siegling
Feser, M., Radau, L., & Siegling, M. (2017). Auf der Suche nach dem Sinn: Entwicklung eines deutschsprachigen Fragebogens zur Messung von Sinn in der Arbeit. Unveröffentlichte Arbeit. Freie Universität Berlin.
Zusammenstellung soziwalwissenschaftlicher Items und Skalen
  • A Fischer
  • H Kohr
Fischer, A., & Kohr, H. (2014a). Entfremdung von der Arbeit. Zusammenstellung soziwalwissenschaftlicher Items und Skalen. Retrieved from: http://zis.gesis.org/skala/Fischer-Kohr-Entfremdung-von-der-Arbeit (24.05.2019)
Arbeit als Mittel der Existenzsicherung. Zusammenstellung soziwalwissenschaftlicher Items und Skalen
  • A Fischer
  • H Kohr
Fischer, A., & Kohr, H. (2014b). Arbeit als Mittel der Existenzsicherung. Zusammenstellung soziwalwissenschaftlicher Items und Skalen. Retrieved from: http://zis.gesis.org/skala/Fischer-Kohr-Arbeit-als-Mittel-derExistenzsicherung (24.05.2019)