A preview of this full-text is provided by American Psychological Association.
Content available from American Psychologist
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
Would I Be Helped? Cross-National CCTV Footage Shows That
Intervention Is the Norm in Public Conflicts
Richard Philpot
Lancaster University and University of Copenhagen
Lasse Suonperä Liebst
University of Copenhagen
Mark Levine
Lancaster University and University of Exeter
Wim Bernasco
Netherlands Institute for the Study of Crime and Law
Enforcement (NSCR), Amsterdam, the Netherlands, and Vrije
Universiteit Amsterdam
Marie Rosenkrantz Lindegaard
Netherlands Institute for the Study of Crime and Law Enforcement (NSCR), Amsterdam, the Netherlands,
and University of Copenhagen
Half a century of research on bystander behavior concludes that individuals are less likely
to intervene during an emergency when in the presence of others than when alone. By
contrast, little is known regarding the aggregated likelihood that at least someone present
at an emergency will do something to help. The importance of establishing this aggre-
gated intervention baseline is not only of scholarly interest but is also the most pressing
question for actual public victims—will I receive help if needed? The current article
describes the largest systematic study of real-life bystander intervention in actual public
conflicts captured by surveillance cameras. Using a unique cross-national video dataset
from the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, and South Africa (N⫽219), we show that
in 9 of 10 public conflicts, at least 1 bystander, but typically several, will do something
to help. We record similar likelihoods of intervention across the 3 national contexts,
which differ greatly in levels of perceived public safety. Finally, we find that increased
bystander presence is related to a greater likelihood that someone will intervene. Taken
together these findings allay the widespread fear that bystanders rarely intervene to help.
We argue that it is time for psychology to change the narrative away from an absence of
help and toward a new understanding of what makes intervention successful or
unsuccessful.
Keywords: bystander effect, bystander intervention, aggression and violence, dangerous
emergencies, helping and prosocial behavior
This article was published Online First June 3, 2019.
Richard Philpot, Department of Psychology, Lancaster University,
and Department of Sociology, University of Copenhagen; Lasse Suon-
perä Liebst, Department of Sociology, University of Copenhagen; Mark
Levine, Department of Psychology, Lancaster University, and Depart-
ment of Psychology, University of Exeter; Wim Bernasco, Netherlands
Institute for the Study of Crime and Law Enforcement (NSCR), Am-
sterdam, the Netherlands, and Department of Spatial Economics, Vrije
Universiteit Amsterdam; Marie Rosenkrantz Lindegaard, Netherlands
Institute for the Study of Crime and Law Enforcement (NSCR), and
Department of Sociology, University of Copenhagen.
The authors would like to thank Laura Behrend Pedersen, Kasper
Lykke Dausel, Jonathan Salka and Nor Voldum-Clausen for their
important input and assistance in the coding of data. Helpful comments
from reviewers and the editor, as well as discussions with Peter Ejbye-
Ernst and Poul Poder, greatly improved earlier versions of this article.
This work was supported by the Engineering and Physical Sciences
Research Council [EPSRC – 1402902] and the Danish Council for
Independent Research [DFF – 6109-00210]. The funders had no role in
the design of the paper, analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of
the manuscript.
Replication data, statistical scripts, and video coding procedures are
made available on the Open Science Framework at https://osf.io/xzjsg.
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Richard
Philpot, Department of Psychology, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1
4YF, United Kingdom. E-mail: r.philpot@lancaster.ac.uk
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
American Psychologist
© 2019 American Psychological Association 2020, Vol. 75, No. 1, 66–75
0003-066X/20/$12.00 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/amp0000469
66