Residents of urban informal riverside settlements are regularly threatened by floods and simultaneously are
facing potential eviction, particularly in multi-hazard prone cities in developing countries in Asia. Governments
usually choose relocation as a preventive measure due to the high exposure of riverside communities whereas
ignoring the repercussions on the resident's socio-economic conditions of these dramatical changes. However,
residents, despite the vulnerabilities, aim to remain in their original homes and to pursue possibilities to negotiate
with the governments and ideally achieve fair alternatives for reducing the flood risk and change the
negative public image of their communities. This study explores three scenarios of which resulted in failure,
success and uncertain outcomes and exposes the governance challenges for a fair citizen-government negotiation.