ArticlePDF Available

Abstract

A gender social transition in prepubertal children is a form of psychosocial treatment that aims to reduce gender dysphoria, but with the likely consequence of subsequent (lifelong) biomedical treatments as well (gender‐affirming hormonal treatment and surgery). Gender social transition of prepubertal children will increase dramatically the rate of gender dysphoria persistence when compared to follow‐up studies of children with gender dysphoria who did not receive this type of psychosocial intervention and, oddly enough, might be characterized as iatrogenic. Parents who bring their children for clinical care hold different philosophical views on what is the best way to help reduce the gender dysphoria, which require both respect and understanding.
Debate: Different strokes for different folks
Kenneth J. Zucker
Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
A gender social transition in prepubertal children is a form of psychosocial treatment that aims to reduce gen-
der dysphoria, but with the likely consequence of subsequent (lifelong) biomedical treatments as well (gen-
der-affirming hormonal treatment and surgery). Gender social transition of prepubertal children will increase
dramatically the rate of gender dysphoria persistence when compared to follow-up studies of children with
gender dysphoria who did not receive this type of psychosocial intervention and, oddly enough, might be char-
acterized as iatrogenic. Parents who bring their children for clinical care hold different philosophical views on
what is the best way to help reduce the gender dysphoria, which require both respect and understanding.
Keywords: Gender identity; gender dysphoria; psychosocial treatment
The proverbial saying Different strokes for different
folks(The Oxford Dictionary of Phrase and Fable, 2006)
reects well the contemporary clinical debate on best-
practice therapeutics for children with gender dyspho-
ria. It reects not only the variation in the philosophical
and theoretical perspectives of front-line clinicians, but
also variation in the philosophical belief systems of par-
ents who bring their children to mental health profes-
sionals for clinical advice and care.
For prepubertal children with gender dysphoria, I
would argue that there are three main approaches to
therapeutics, which I list here in chronological/histori-
cal order: (a) active psychosocial treatment to reduce
gender dysphoria so that the childs eventual gender
identity is more congruent with her or his biological sex
(thus obviating the necessity for what some now call
gender-afrminghormonal and surgical treatment); (b)
wait-and-seeor watchful waiting, which makes the
assumption that it is difcult to predict what the long-
term outcome will be and so, well, the clinician should
not recommend very much one way or the other; and (c)
gender social transition, in which the childssocial
gender identity is shifted from the gender assigned at
birth to the putative desired gender (e.g., change in
name, change in pronoun usage, and change in other
phenotypic social attributes, such as hair-style and
clothing-style that mark ones gender to signicant
others). Dreger (2009) characterized the rst approach
the therapeuticmodel and the third approach the
accommodationmodel.
These rather marked variations in the type of psy-
chosocial treatment considered to be in the best interest
of the child reect deep structure variations in theoreti-
cal perspectives on the nature and nurture of psychosex-
ual differentiation (see the edited volume by Drescher &
Byne, 2012). On the one hand, the rst approach
assumes that, for young children with gender dysphoria,
gender identity is not xed or locked inat an early age
and that there is a much greater degree of malleability
and plasticity than might be the case for both adoles-
cents and adults with gender dysphoria. On the other
hand, the third approach assumes that gender identity
is xed and locked in at a very early age because of
underlying biological mechanisms. One of the most well-
known children with gender dysphoria, Jazz Jennings,
has promulgated this view in her book, written for chil-
dren, I Am Jazz(Herthel & Jennings, 2014) where Jazz
writes I have a girl brain but a boy body....I was born
this way!
As noted in several guideline reviews on clinical prac-
tice for the treatment of children with gender dysphoria
(AACAP Practice Parameter on Gay, Lesbian, or Bisexual
Sexual Orientation, Gender Nonconformity, and Gender
Discordance in Children and Adolescents, 2012; Ameri-
can Psychological Association, 2015; Byne et al., 2012),
the eld suffers from a vexing problem: There are no ran-
domized controlled trials (RCT) of different treatment
approaches, so the front-line clinician has to rely on
lower-order levels of evidence in deciding on what the
optimal approach to treatment might be. One quote is
sufcient to document this point: Different clinical
approaches have been advocated for childhood gender
discordance.... There have been no randomized con-
trolled trials of any treatment....the proposed benets of
treatment to eliminate gender discordance...must be
carefully weighed against... possible deleterious effects
(AACAP Practice Parameter on Gay, Lesbian, or Bisexual
Sexual Orientation, Gender Nonconformity, and Gender
Discordance in Children and Adolescents, 2012, pp.
968969). Given the cautious conclusions that these
types of reviews have reached, it is of interest how, in
recent years, so many clinicians have embraced the
treatment approach that recommends an early gender
social transition. Chen, Edwards-Leeper, Stancin, and
Tishelman (2018) observed that Over the last decade, we
have seen a sea change in approach to pediatric trans-
gender care, with the gender afrmative model now
widely adopted as preferred practice(p. 74).
In my view, there are reasons to be skeptical about the
merit in recommending an early gender social transition
as a rst-line treatment. One should recognize that if
one peruses carefully the follow-up studies of young chil-
dren with gender dysphoria (or traits of gender dyspho-
ria), the majority of such children do not have gender
©2019 Association for Child and Adolescent Mental Health
Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford OX4 2DQ, UK and 350 Main St, Malden, MA 02148, USA
Child and Adolescent Mental Health Volume **, No. *, 2019, pp. **–** doi:10.1111/camh.12330
dysphoria when followed up in adolescence or adulthood
(Zucker, 2018). In these studies, one can say with rea-
sonable condence that when these children had treat-
ment (and not all did), the one type of treatment they
did not receive was in the form of a prepubertal gender
social transition. As I argued elsewhere (Zucker, 2018),
if one conceptualizes gender social transition as a type
of psychosocial treatment, it should come as no sur-
prise that the rate of gender dysphoria persistence will
be much higher as these children are followed into their
adolescence and young adulthood (see Rae et al.,
2019). If this is, in fact, the case, one might ask why
would one recommend a rst-line treatment that is, in
effect, iatrogenic.
Even if there was a team of researchers motivated to
design an RCT, the implementation of such a study
would be formidable. For example, some parents would
decline to place their child into a psychosocial treatment
arm that would attempt to reduce the childs gender dys-
phoria so as to be more congruent with the gender
assigned at birth; other parents would decline to place
their child into a psychosocial treatment arm that would
attempt to reduce the childs gender dysphoria by af-
rmingtheir felt gender vis-a-vis a social transition. Per-
haps parents who prefer one of these two approaches
would agree to wait-and-seeat least for a while, before
deciding on a more intensive therapeutic approach. This
variation in parental preferences reects, as noted ear-
lier, differences in underlying theoretical and philosophi-
cal perspectives which need to be respected. As the eld
moves forward and more follow-up data become avail-
able, we will learn more about the developmental course
of gender dysphoria in particular and well-being and
mental health in general.
Acknowledgements
The author has declared that he has no competing or potential
conict of interest.
Ethical information
No ethical approval was required for this article.
Correspondence
Kenneth J. Zucker, Department of Psychiatry, Univer-
sity of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 1R8, Canada; Email:
ken.zucker@utoronto.ca
References
American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. (2012).
Practice parameter on gay, lesbian, or bisexual sexual orien-
tation, gender nonconformity, and gender discordance in
children and adolescents. Journal of the American Academy
of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry,51, 957974.
American Psychological Association. (2015). Guidelines for psy-
chological practice with transgender and gender nonconform-
ing people. American Psychologist,70, 832864.
Byne, W., Bradley, S.J., Coleman, E., Eyler, A.E., Green, R.,
Menvielle, E.J., ... & Tompkins, D.A. (2012). Report of the
American Psychiatric Association Task Force on Treatment of
Gender Identity Disorder. Archives of Sexual Behavior,41,
759796.
Chen, D., Edwards-Leeper, L., Stancin, T., & Tishelman, A.
(2018). Advancing the practice of pediatric psychology with
transgender youth: State of the science, ongoing controver-
sies, and future directions. Clinical Practice in Pediatric Psy-
chology,6,7383.
Dreger, A. (2009). Gender identity disorder in childhood:
Inconclusive advice to parents. Hastings Center Report,39,
2629.
Drescher, J., & Byne, W. (2012). Introduction to the Special
Issue on The Treatment of Gender Dysphoria/Gender Vari-
ant Children and Adolescents.Journal of Homosexuality,59,
295300.
Herthel, J., & Jennings, J. (2014). I am Jazz. New York: Penguin
Group.
Rae, J.R., Gulgoz, S., Durwood, L., DeMeules, M., Lowe, R.,
Lindquist, G., & Olson, K.R. (2019). Predicting early-
childhood gender transitions. Psychological Science,
https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619830649.
The Oxford Dictionary of Phrase and Fable. (2006). Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
Zucker, K.J. (2018). The myth of persistence: Response to A
Critical Commentary on Follow-Up Studies and Desistance
Theories about Transgender and Gender Non-Conforming
Childrenby Temple Newhook et al. (2018). International
Journal of Transgenderism,19, 231245.
Accepted for publication: 18 March 2019
©2019 Association for Child and Adolescent Mental Health
2Kenneth J. Zucker Child Adolesc Ment Health 2019; *(*): **–**
... A related theme concerns what critics of the gender-affirming medical pathway refer to as the self-fulfilling prophecy of initiating medical treatment with puberty blockers (p. 5) [74,75]-what Zucker has referred to as "treatment that is, in effect, iatrogenic" (p. 37) [76]. Additionally, Nahata and Quinn (2019) have suggested that young people on puberty suppression "may not have full developmental capacity due to lack of brain development (p. ...
... First, the study was a naturalistic followup study. It did not include a control group-sometimes known as 'wait-and-see' or 'watchful waiting' [76]-and it did not use a blinded, randomised approach. Notwithstanding this, the results raise many important questions for future research and for future reflection. ...
... Together, these processes gave young people with gender-related distress a clear message: "This is the best way to proceed," and "The medical affirmation pathway will take away your gender dysphoria." For many young people and their families, however, these messages favouring medical interventions, coupled with professionals' affirmation of this pathway, potentially displaced their consideration of other options or other pathways [76]. ...
Article
Full-text available
This prospective case-cohort study examines the developmental pathway choices of 79 young people (13.25–23.75 years old; 33 biological males and 46 biological females) referred to a tertiary care hospital’s Department of Psychological Medicine (December 2013–November 2018, at ages 8.42–15.92 years) for diagnostic assessment for gender dysphoria (GD) and for potential gender-affirming medical interventions. All of the young people had attended a screening medical assessment (including puberty staging) by paediatricians. The Psychological Medicine assessment (individual and family) yielded a formal DSM-5 diagnosis of GD in 66 of the young people. Of the 13 not meeting DSM-5 criteria, two obtained a GD diagnosis at a later time. This yielded 68 young people (68/79; 86.1%) with formal diagnoses of GD who were potentially eligible for gender-affirming medical interventions and 11 young people (11/79; 13.9%) who were not. Follow-up took place between November 2022 and January 2023. Within the GD subgroup (n = 68) (with two lost to follow-up), six had desisted (desistance rate of 9.1%; 6/66), and 60 had persisted on a GD (transgender) pathway (persistence rate of 90.9%; 60/66). Within the cohort as a whole (with two lost to follow-up), the overall persistence rate was 77.9% (60/77), and overall desistance rate for gender-related distress was 22.1% (17/77). Ongoing mental health concerns were reported by 44/50 (88.0%), and educational/occupational outcomes varied widely. The study highlights the importance of careful screening, comprehensive biopsychosocial (including family) assessment, and holistic therapeutic support. Even in highly screened samples of children and adolescents seeking a GD diagnosis and gender-affirming medical care, outcome pathways follow a diverse range of possibilities.
... Less is known about desistance in the novel cohort of young people presenting today. Unlike in the past when clinicians actively worked with children and their parents to lessen gender dysphoria or adopted a neutral strategy of "watchful waiting" (Cohen-Kettenis & Pfäfflin, 2003;Zucker, 2008aZucker, , 2008b, many of today's youth undergo some form of gender social transition (e.g., change in clothes, haircut, name, and pronouns; breast binding; use of opposite sex facilities, etc.) before contemplating medical interventions (Morandini et al., 2023;Olson et al., 2022;Zucker, 2020). Although social transition is often described as a neutral intervention with little, if any, longterm consequences, several studies support the hypothesis that it can concretize gender dysphoria Turban et al., 2021a;Zucker, 2020). ...
... Unlike in the past when clinicians actively worked with children and their parents to lessen gender dysphoria or adopted a neutral strategy of "watchful waiting" (Cohen-Kettenis & Pfäfflin, 2003;Zucker, 2008aZucker, , 2008b, many of today's youth undergo some form of gender social transition (e.g., change in clothes, haircut, name, and pronouns; breast binding; use of opposite sex facilities, etc.) before contemplating medical interventions (Morandini et al., 2023;Olson et al., 2022;Zucker, 2020). Although social transition is often described as a neutral intervention with little, if any, longterm consequences, several studies support the hypothesis that it can concretize gender dysphoria Turban et al., 2021a;Zucker, 2020). Moreover, recent evidence suggests that social transition might not be associated with improved mental health status in the short term (Morandini et al., 2023). ...
Article
Full-text available
Gender transition is undertaken to improve the well-being of people suffering from gender dysphoria. However, some have argued that the evidence supporting medical interventions for gender transition (e.g., hormonal therapies and surgery) is weak and inconclusive, and an increasing number of people have come forward recently to share their experiences of transition regret and detransition. In this essay, I discuss emerging clinical and research issues related to transition regret and detransition with the aim of arming clinicians with the latest information so they can support patients navigating the challenges of regret and detransition. I begin by describing recent changes in the epidemiology of gender dysphoria, conceptualization of transgender identification, and models of care. I then discuss the potential impact of these changes on regret and detransition; the prevalence of desistance, regret, and detransition; reasons for detransition; and medical and mental healthcare needs of detransitioners. Although recent data have shed light on a complex range of experiences that lead people to detransition, research remains very much in its infancy. Little is known about the medical and mental healthcare needs of these patients, and there is currently no guidance on best practices for clinicians involved in their care. Moreover, the term detransition can hold a wide array of possible meanings for transgender-identifying people, detransitioners, and researchers, leading to inconsistences in its usage. Moving forward, minimizing harm will require conducting robust research, challenging fundamental assumptions, scrutinizing of practice patterns, and embracing debate.
... It should be noted that high resolution of childhood-onset gender dysphoria had been recorded before the practice of social transition of young children was endorsed by the American Academy of Pediatrics (Rafferty et al., 2018). It is possible that social transition will predispose a young person to persistence of transgender identity long-term (Zucker, 2020). ...
... Evidence suggests that social transition is associated with the persistence of gender dysphoria (Hembree et al., 2017;Steensma, McGuire, Kreukels, Beekman, & Cohen-Kettenis, 2013). This suggests that social gender transition is a form of a psychological intervention with potential lasting effects (Zucker, 2020). While the causality has not been proven, the possibility of iatrogenesis and the resulting exposure to the risks of future medical and surgical gender dysphoria treatments, qualifies social gender transition for explicit, rather than implied, consent. ...
Article
Full-text available
In less than a decade, the western world has witnessed an unprecedented rise in the numbers of children and adolescents seeking gender transition. Despite the precedent of years of gender-affirmative care, the social, medical and surgical interventions are still based on very low-quality evidence. The many risks of these interventions, including medicalizing a temporary adolescent identity, have come into a clearer focus through an awareness of detransitioners. The risks of gender-affirmative care are ethically managed through a properly conducted informed consent process. Its elements-deliberate sharing of the hoped-for benefits, known risks and long-term outcomes, and alternative treatments-must be delivered in a manner that promotes comprehension. The process is limited by: erroneous professional assumptions; poor quality of the initial evaluations; and inaccurate and incomplete information shared with patients and their parents. We discuss data on suicide and present the limitations of the Dutch studies that have been the basis for interventions. Beliefs about gender-affirmative care need to be separated from the established facts. A proper informed consent processes can both prepare parents and patients for the difficult choices that they must make and can ease professionals' ethical tensions. Even when properly accomplished, however, some clinical circumstances exist that remain quite uncertain.
... Some authors have warned of possible "iatrogenic" effects of early social transition, based on data suggesting childhood social transition is associated with an increased likelihood of persistence of gender dysphoria (Steensma et al., , 2013 into adolescence and adulthood. Given a body of data suggests that the majority of cases of childhood onset gender dysphoria desist before adulthood (Singh et al., 2021;Zucker, 2018Zucker, , 2020, early social transition may increase the likelihood that gender dysphoria will persist and that hormonal and/or surgical transition will be required to alleviate gender-related distress. It should be stressed that it is beyond the scope of the present study to lend to support to this or other interpretations of the data. ...
Article
Full-text available
Social gender transition is an increasingly accepted intervention for gender variant children and adolescents. To date, there is scant literature comparing the mental health of children and adolescents diagnosed with gender dysphoria who have socially transitioned versus those who are still living in their birth-assigned gender. We examined the mental health of children and adolescents referred to the Gender Identity Development Service (GIDS), a specialist clinic in London, UK, who had socially transitioned (i.e., were living in their affirmed gender and/or had changed their name) versus those who had not socially transitioned. Referrals to the GIDS were aged 4–17 years. We assessed mental health correlates of living in one’s affirmed gender among 288 children and adolescents (208 birth-assigned female; 210 socially transitioned) and of name change in 357 children and adolescents (253 birth-assigned female; 214 name change). The presence or absence of mood and anxiety difficulties and past suicide attempts were clinician rated. Living in role and name change were more prevalent in birth-assigned females versus birth-assigned males. Overall, there were no significant effects of social transition or name change on mental health status. These findings identify the need for more research to understand how social transition influences mental health, including longitudinal studies that allow for more confident inferences to be made regarding the relationship between social transition and mental health in young people with gender dysphoria.
... Little is known, however, about whether the developmental pathways of socially transitioned transgender children differ from those of cisgender children (Stynes et al., 2021). Many experts working with gender diverse youth have noted that data assessing gender identity and gender-typed preferences of socially transitioned transgender children over time are lacking (Byne et al., 2012;Coleman et al., 2012;Drescher & Pula, 2014;Singh et al., 2021;Steensma & Cohen-Kettenis, 2018;Stynes et al., 2021;Turban & Keuroghlian, 2018;Zucker, 2020). In the present research, we sought to examine the continuity (and/or change) of gender identity and gender-typed preferences for both cisgender and transgender prepubertal children across a period of 2.6 years (SD = 1.0). ...
Article
While considerable research has examined gender development in middle childhood, little longitudinal work has been conducted at this time to indicate whether, for example, youth who show more or less gender conformity at one point continue to do so later. The present study investigated the consistency of gender identity and preferences for gender-stereotypical toys, clothing, and same-gender peer preferences among groups of transgender youth (n = 158), their siblings (n = 79), and an unrelated group of cisgender youth (n = 128) from a mean age of 7.0 (range 3.0-10.9) to a mean age of 9.6 (range 5.1-12.0). Furthermore, 65.5% of the youth were girls, 69.7% were White, 72.8% grew up in households with an annual household income of $75,000 or more, and 89.9% of parents had a bachelor's degree or higher. Overall, we found a small-to-medium correlation over this 2.6-year span within each group, both across the composite of measures and most measures individually. Despite the moderate stability over time, we found a decrease in the composite and individual scores over this time span for girls and for transgender participants. Together these results suggested some stability in children's gender identity and preferences in middle childhood and that this was true regardless of whether the child's gender did or did not align with their sex assignment at birth. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
... Little is known, however, about whether the developmental pathways of socially transitioned transgender children differ from those of cisgender children (Stynes et al., 2021). Many experts working with gender diverse youth have noted that data assessing gender identity and gender-typed preferences of socially transitioned transgender children over time are lacking (Byne et al., 2012;Coleman et al., 2012;Drescher & Pula, 2014;Singh et al., 2021;Steensma & Cohen-Kettenis, 2018;Stynes et al., 2021;Turban & Keuroghlian, 2018;Zucker, 2020). In the present research, we sought to examine the continuity (and/or change) of gender identity and gender-typed preferences for both cisgender and transgender prepubertal children across a period of 2.6 years (SD = 1.0). ...
Preprint
While considerable research has examined gender development in middle childhood, little longitudinal work has been conducted at this time to indicate whether, for example, youth who show more or less gender conformity at one point continue to do so later. The present study investigated the consistency of gender identity and preferences for gender-stereotypical toys, clothing, and same-gender peer preferences amongst groups of transgender youth (n=158), their siblings (n=79), and an unrelated group of cisgender youth (n=128) from a mean age of 7.0 (range 3.0-10.9) to a mean age of 9.6 (range 5.1-12.0). Furthermore, 65.5% of the youth were girls, 69.7% were White, 72.8% grew up in households with an annual household income of 75,000$ or more, and 89.9% of parents had a bachelor’s degree or higher. Overall, we found a small-to-medium correlation over this 2.6-year span within each group, both across the composite of measures and most measures individually. Despite the moderate stability over time, we found a decrease in the composite and individual scores over this time span for girls and for transgender participants. Together these results suggested some stability in children’s gender identity and preferences in middle childhood and that this was true regardless of whether the child’s gender did or did not align with their sex assignment at birth.
... That course of action involves four major stages: social transition, puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and, lastly, surgery (or multiple surgeries). These stages are often presented in terms of their reversibility: Social transition is fully reversible [though not a "neutral" intervention (Zucker, 2020)], puberty blockers are physically reversible [but long-term effects on adolescent brain development are unknown (Richards et al., 2019)], cross-sex hormones are partially reversible, and surgeries are irreversible. ...
Article
Full-text available
In order to align with their inner sense of gender identity, adolescents suffering from gender dysphoria are increasingly being treated with cross-sex hormones and irreversible surgeries to alter their bodies. The present study is the first to examine attitudes about these recently emergent medical practices in a national population. We used data from the 2018 Post-Midterm Election Study, a survey representative of adults in the USA ages 20 to 65 years (N = 5285), to examine the social factors associated with approval or disapproval of hormonal and/or surgical interventions for adolescents seeking medical treatment for gender dysphoria. Higher fertility, race/ethnicity (in this case, black), sex (male), and heterosexual self-identity were each robustly associated with disapproval. Nested regression models revealed that a range of religion measures were statistically significant (toward disapproval). However, all but evangelical self-identification were no longer significant after accounting for support for abortion rights, the spectrum of political self-identification, and voting behavior. These findings, prompted by a high percentage of variance explained, led us to consider perspectives on medical transitions for adolescents as fitting the “culture war” framework, largely polarized between a “progressive” worldview of bodily autonomy and an “orthodox” worldview of bodily integrity.
... It has also become more common for parents to have already implemented a gender social transition on their own, without any formal input from a health professional (151). As argued by Zucker (64,152), this is a very different type of psychosocial treatment designed to reduce gender dysphoria when compared to the other kinds of treatments noted above that have been recommended over the years. ...
Article
Full-text available
This study reports follow-up data on the largest sample to date of boys clinic-referred for gender dysphoria ( n = 139) with regard to gender identity and sexual orientation. In childhood, the boys were assessed at a mean age of 7.49 years (range, 3.33–12.99) at a mean year of 1989 and followed-up at a mean age of 20.58 years (range, 13.07–39.15) at a mean year of 2002. In childhood, 88 (63.3%) of the boys met the DSM-III, III-R, or IV criteria for gender identity disorder; the remaining 51 (36.7%) boys were subthreshold for the criteria. At follow-up, gender identity/dysphoria was assessed via multiple methods and the participants were classified as either persisters or desisters. Sexual orientation was ascertained for both fantasy and behavior and then dichotomized as either biphilic/androphilic or gynephilic. Of the 139 participants, 17 (12.2%) were classified as persisters and the remaining 122 (87.8%) were classified as desisters. Data on sexual orientation in fantasy were available for 129 participants: 82 (63.6%) were classified as biphilic/androphilic, 43 (33.3%) were classified as gynephilic, and 4 (3.1%) reported no sexual fantasies. For sexual orientation in behavior, data were available for 108 participants: 51 (47.2%) were classified as biphilic/androphilic, 29 (26.9%) were classified as gynephilic, and 28 (25.9%) reported no sexual behaviors. Multinomial logistic regression examined predictors of outcome for the biphilic/androphilic persisters and the gynephilic desisters, with the biphilic/androphilic desisters as the reference group. Compared to the reference group, the biphilic/androphilic persisters tended to be older at the time of the assessment in childhood, were from a lower social class background, and, on a dimensional composite of sex-typed behavior in childhood were more gender-variant. The biphilic/androphilic desisters were more gender-variant compared to the gynephilic desisters. Boys clinic-referred for gender identity concerns in childhood had a high rate of desistance and a high rate of a biphilic/androphilic sexual orientation. The implications of the data for current models of care for the treatment of gender dysphoria in children are discussed.
Parents and caregivers may seek help with different questions or concerns on how to handle the diverse gender expressions of their children. Sometimes the issue may be evident while seeking medical advice for other concerns. Because of the many uncertainties around this topic, clinicians need to know what to say and what can be done to provide the best possible care for gender-diverse children.
Article
Full-text available
Gender dysphoria is a persistent distress about one's assigned gender. Referrals regarding gender dysphoria have recently greatly increased, often of a form that is rapid in onset. The sex ratio has changed, most now being natal females. Mental health issues pre-date the dysphoria in most. Puberty blockers are offered in clinics to help the child avoid puberty. Puberty blockers have known serious side effects, with uncertainty about their long-term use. They do not improve mental health. Without medication, most will desist from the dysphoria in time. Yet over 90% of those treated with puberty blockers progress to cross-sex hormones and often surgery, with irreversible consequences. The brain is biologically and socially immature in childhood and unlikely to understand the long-term consequences of treatment. The prevailing culture to affirm the dysphoria is critically reviewed. It is concluded that children are unable to consent to the use of puberty blockers.
Article
Full-text available
Temple Newhook et al. (2018) provide a critique of recent follow-up studies of children referred to specialized gender identity clinics, organized around rates of persistence and desistance. The critical gaze of Temple Newhook et al. examined three primary issues: (1) the terms persistence and desistance in their own right; (2) methodology of the follow-up studies and interpretation of the data; and (3) ethical matters. In this response, I interrogate the critique of Temple Newhook et al. (2018).
Article
Full-text available
Growing numbers of transgender and gender-nonconforming (TGNC) youth are presenting for medical and mental health care, and increasingly, pediatric psychologists are being called upon to serve as critical members of interdisciplinary care teams. In this commentary, we present information on TGNC youth in three distinct developmental cohorts: prepubescent TGNC children, peripubertal TGNC youth, and pubertal TGNC adolescents. First, we describe the social, medical, and/or surgical treatments available to each cohort of youth. Next, we address the state of the science related to these treatments. Then, we highlight some of the ongoing controversies related to social, medical and/or surgical interventions that are most relevant to pediatric psychologists and the role they play in gender-affirming care. Finally, we conclude with a call for papers for an upcoming special issue of Clinical Practice in Pediatric Psychology focused on advancing the practice of pediatric psychology in transgender health care.
Article
Full-text available
Children and adolescents who are growing up gay, lesbian, bisexual, gender nonconforming, or gender discordant experience unique developmental challenges. They are at risk for certain mental health problems, many of which are significantly correlated with stigma and prejudice. Mental health professionals have an important role to play in fostering healthy development in this population. Influences on sexual orientation, gender nonconformity, and gender discordance, and their developmental relationships to each other, are reviewed. Practice principles and related issues of cultural competence, research needs, and ethics are discussed.
Article
Full-text available
Both the diagnosis and treatment of Gender Identity Disorder (GID) are controversial. Although linked, they are separate issues and the DSM does not evaluate treatments. The Board of Trustees (BOT) of the American Psychiatric Association (APA), therefore, formed a Task Force charged to perform a critical review of the literature on the treatment of GID at different ages, to assess the quality of evidence pertaining to treatment, and to prepare a report that included an opinion as to whether or not sufficient credible literature exists for development of treatment recommendations by the APA. The literature on treatment of gender dysphoria in individuals with disorders of sex development was also assessed. The completed report was accepted by the BOT on September 11, 2011. The quality of evidence pertaining to most aspects of treatment in all subgroups was determined to be low; however, areas of broad clinical consensus were identified and were deemed sufficient to support recommendations for treatment in all subgroups. With subjective improvement as the primary outcome measure, current evidence was judged sufficient to support recommendations for adults in the form of an evidence-based APA Practice Guideline with gaps in the empirical data supplemented by clinical consensus. The report recommends that the APA take steps beyond drafting treatment recommendations. These include issuing position statements to clarify the APA's position regarding the medical necessity of treatments for GID, the ethical bounds of treatments of gender variant minors, and the rights of persons of any age who are gender variant, transgender or transsexual.
Article
Increasing numbers of gender-nonconforming children are socially transitioning—changing pronouns to live as their identified genders. We studied a cohort of gender-nonconforming children (n = 85) and contacted them again approximately 2 years later. When recontacted, 36 of the children had socially transitioned. We found that stronger cross-sex identification and preferences expressed by gender-nonconforming children at initial testing predicted whether they later socially transitioned. We then compared the gender-nonconforming children with groups of transitioned transgender children (n = 84) and gender-conforming controls (n = 85). Children from our longitudinal cohort who would later transition were highly similar to transgender children (children who had already socially transitioned) and to control children of the gender to which they would eventually transition. Gender-nonconforming children who would not go on to transition were different from these groups. These results suggest that (a) social transitions may be predictable from gender identification and preferences and (b) gender identification and preferences may not meaningfully differ before and after social transitions.
Article
In 2015, the American Psychological Association adopted Guidelines for Psychological Practice with Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Clients in order to describe affirmative psychological practice with transgender and gender nonconforming (TGNC) clients. There are 16 guidelines in this document that guide TGNC-affirmative psychological practice across the lifespan, from TGNC children to older adults. The Guidelines are organized into five clusters: (a) foundational knowledge and awareness; (b) stigma, discrimination, and barriers to care; (c) lifespan development; (d) assessment, therapy, and intervention; and (e) research, education, and training. In addition, the guidelines provide attention to TGNC people across a range of gender and racial/ethnic identities. The psychological practice guidelines also attend to issues of research and how psychologists may address the many social inequities TGNC people experience.
Article
For purposes of this essay, let's invent a contemporary American child named William Lee. William is five years old and, as far as anyone can tell, his body is that of a typical male. But William has long acted in a fashion more typical of girls: he likes to play with "girl" toys like Barbie dolls and My Little Pony; he strongly prefers playing with girls to playing with boys; and he likes to dress up like a conventionally pretty woman, in pumps and dresses, with jewelry and make-up. He increasingly insists he is really a girl and indicates a belief—or a desperate hope—that he will grow up to be a woman. He wants to be called "Julie" and to go to school as Julie. He exhibits what psychologists call gender dysphoria. This stresses out his parents; it is not easy to have a child who challenges social norms, especially norms about gender. If William's parents are not living in a media-free universe, they will know that there are two basic models of thought about what they should do. One, which I'll call the therapeutic model, maintains that William is showing all the signs of gender identity disorder (GID) and that he should be treated by a mental health professional. Or rather, his family should be treated by mental health professionals because, according to the typical contemporary therapeutic perspective, William needs—and lacks—a family that is functioning well psychologically and emotionally. If his mother is depressed or clingy, if his father is physically or emotionally absent, if his parents' marriage is a stressful mess, William is going to keep suffering from gender role confusion, and secondarily from the anger, shame, disappointment, anxiety, and guilt that his parents may exhibit in response. Although the therapeutic model does not point to a single cause of GID, it does see familial dysfunction as an aggravating factor in virtually all cases. Under the therapeutic model, mental health professionals will attend to the relevant family members—particularly William and his parents—and will try to help move William toward a less stressful, more sustainable family environment and gender identity. William will be given gender-neutral toys to replace his Barbie and My Little Pony and will, ideally, be led to develop friendships with other boys—not boys of the rough-and-tumble, army-toy-obsessed type, since William will never relate well to those boys, but boys of the calmer, gentler variety. William will implicitly learn that he can be a boy without having to be aggressive and competitive. As part of the new family discipline, William's mother and father will learn to act like a loving mother and father should, and William will not be allowed to go to school as a girl or to otherwise pretend he is a girl. Thus, the therapeutic approach assumes that William's desire to grow up as a woman represents a kind of problematic fantasy and that, with the right interventions, it can be made to dissipate.1 Evidence that this approach makes GID dissipate is lacking. The second model of thought, which I'll call the accommodation model, presumes that there is nothing wrong with William—or rather, Julie—and nothing wrong with the Lee family, either, except perhaps the largely unnecessary suffering they experience from failing to understand that William really is Julie. According to this model—but not according to any strong scientific evidence—Julie was born with a female brain in a male body. The problem is not the child, nor the family, but the culture, and so the culture must learn to accommodate Julie as she grows to become a woman. The role of medicine, according to the accommodation model, is not to "resolve" Julie's "gender identity disorder," but to provide her, when the time comes, with the hormones and surgeries she will need to make her body into what it should have always been and with the psychological support to help cope with a hostile world.2 Now, if the Lees were to ask me, "What should we do?" I honestly would not know what approach to suggest. But I do...