ArticlePDF Available

Beyond Censorship: Contestation in Half of a Yellow Sun’s Cinematic Adaptation

Authors:

Abstract

In the last few decades, particularly since 1999, Nigeria has been faced with enormous challenges. None, however, seems to trigger a deeper sense of apprehension than the thought or mention of Biafra. Though the country ‘ceased to exist’ in 1970, after a perfunctory reconciliation programme, Biafra, expressed either in figurative or rhetorical terms or principally as part of a future experiment or movement as seen recently in parts of Eastern Nigeria, evokes not only a feeling of mutual suspicion but a stark denial of a lived experience. The film, Half of a Yellow Sun, an adaptation of Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie’s novel with the same title, readily confirms this belief. Billed to screen in Nigerian cinemas on April 25, 2014, the film suddenly witnessed series of roadblocks by Nigeria’s Censors Board. Although the film eventually premiered in August of the same year, the Board’s initial refusal to certify the film, raised suspicions among citizens on Nigeria’s bland attitude towards any material expressions on the Nigeria-Biafra civil war. This study explores the trajectory of events that led to the censorship and eventual certification of the movie. It identifies and clarifies some historical inaccuracies depicted in the movie in the account of the civil war. The study argues that a film of this nature, irrespective of its framings, could serve as a veritable tool for a collective and useful discussion on the civil war, rather than the familiar contestations it evokes across divides.
An Interdisciplinary Journal
http://www.netsoljournal.net/
Volume 4, Issue 1, pp.16-35, Spring 2019
https://doi.org/10.24819/netsol2019.02
Date Submitted: September 15, 2018 Date Accepted: May 15, 2019
16
Beyond Censorship: Contestation in Half of a Yellow Sun’s Cinematic
Adaptation
Raheem Oluwafunminiyi
Centre for Black Culture & International Understanding, Nigeria
Abstract
In the last few decades, particularly since 1999, Nigeria has been faced with enormous challenges.
None, however, seems to trigger a deeper sense of apprehension than the thought or mention of
Biafra. Though the country ‘ceased to exist’ in 1970, after a perfunctory reconciliation programme,
Biafra, expressed either in figurative or rhetorical terms or principally as part of a future
experiment or movement as seen recently in parts of Eastern Nigeria, evokes not only a feeling of
mutual suspicion but a stark denial of a lived experience. The film, Half of a Yellow Sun, an
adaptation of Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie’s novel with the same title, readily confirms this belief.
Billed to screen in Nigerian cinemas on April 25, 2014, the film suddenly witnessed series of
roadblocks by Nigeria’s Censors Board. Although the film eventually premiered in August of the
same year, the Board’s initial refusal to certify the film, raised suspicions among citizens on
Nigeria’s bland attitude towards any material expressions on the Nigeria-Biafra civil war. This
study explores the trajectory of events that led to the censorship and eventual certification of the
movie. It identifies and clarifies some historical inaccuracies depicted in the movie in the account
of the civil war. The study argues that a film of this nature, irrespective of its framings, could serve
as a veritable tool for a collective and useful discussion on the civil war, rather than the familiar
contestations it evokes across divides.
Key Words: Censorship, NFVCB, Half of a Yellow Sun, Biafra, Civil War, Nigeria
17
Introduction
The early postcolonial phase of Nigeria was bedevilled with enormous challenges, chief of
which was ethnic and sectional divisions. By 1966, six years into independence, the country slid
into a crisis that ushered in two bloody coups and the breakaway of the Eastern Region, sparking
the Nigeria-Biafra war. In the prelude to the war, many Easterners who were domiciled particularly
in the Northern region became targets of widespread massacre. As fallout of the Federal
Government’s failure to respond appropriately to the massacre, the Eastern Region acted swiftly
by declaring self-independence to secure its own survival and security. The government’s desire
to re-assert its authority started the war in 1967.
1
Although the war ended with Biafran surrender
in 1970 and an olive branch extended to all Easterners through the government’s 3R
(Reconciliation, Rehabilitation and Reconstruction) program, none of these were fully
implemented to the Easterners.
2
Since 1970, the Nigerian Government’s attitude to the Biafra
conflict has generally remained retributive, suppressive, and repressive. The fallout of this conflict
has resulted in the political, economic, and social exclusion of the Eastern Region in the last four
and half decades and triggered the emergence of supra-ethnic agencies as a response to decades of
government ‘intransigence’ to the civil war.
3
Like the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) among other supra-ethnic movements, who
today exudes the memories of Biafra and the Nigeria-Biafra war, the movie, Half of a Yellow Sun
illustrates one of the few attempts at re-enacting the past in ways that could help generate useful
discussions about Nigeria’s present challenges and perhaps, pathways to national reconciliation.
Despite not being wholly set on the civil war, at least within the context of its portrayal as the ‘love
story of two sisters wedged in the wave of the Biafra war, fears subsist among the political class
that such a film could trigger a nationwide conflagration. However true this may seem, the
mishandling of the film has revealed the fact that the country continues to live perpetually in denial
about the 1967 Biafra experience. The case has questioned the sincerity of the political class in
tackling many of its inherited challenges since independence. Thus, the causes of series of
roadblocks faced by the film at the outset are understandable.
The film, as the study shall later illuminate, faced enormous challenges right from
conception. By the time it was ready for the cinemas, the Nigerian Film and Video Censors Board
denied the movie certification. This block delayed its initial date of release for four months.
4
Under
1
For a historical background on the Nigeria-Biafra war, see Charles R. Nixon, Self-Determination: The
Nigeria/Biafra Case, World Politics, 24/4 (1972): 473-497.
2
Norman Thomas Uphoff and Harold Ottemoeller, After the Nigerian Civil War: With Malice toward
Whom? Africa Today 17/2 (1970): 1-4; George Onyejiuwa, South East Marginalisation Started with
Gowon’s Regime”, Sun Newspaper, November 13, 2018.
3
Chimaobi Nwaiwu, Pandemonium as Police, MASSOB Clash during 16th Anniversary Service,
Vanguard, September 14, 2015.
4
The author reliably gathered from the former Executive Director of the NFVCB that the agency did not
grant approval for the Lagos premiere of HOAYS on April 12, 2014, suggesting that the movie was
premiered illegally.
18
the circumstances, we are hard-pressed to express whether this was fortuitous or calculated.
However, Half of a Yellow Sun illustrates some of the immense challenges the stakeholders in the
Nigerian film industry face in terms of raising awareness against the background of Nigeria’s
‘ignoble’ past. A film such as this, with hues of the country’s brutal past, often set off momentous
contestations, and in most cases fear of violent attacks. Was the Censors Board, therefore,
imperceptive or judicious in its reaction to the movie? Was its strict censorship, as feared in some
quarters, part of the typical political culture of denial? While critical responses shall be provided
subsequently, this study examines some of the events that led to the deferments by the Censors
Board and eventual premiering of the film. It also highlights and clarifies some of the accounts of
the civil war depicted in the movie. The study argues that a film of this nature, regardless of its
critics, could serve as a veritable tool for a collective and useful discussion on the civil war, rather
than the familiar contestations it evokes in certain divides. It is, therefore, a potentially important
addition to the scholarship on both the Nigerian cinema and the treatment of conflict and post-war
trauma.
Half of a Yellow Sun: A Didactic Review
The discussion here is not meant to follow the conventional routine of reviewing or in this
case, critiquing a movie. The intention, therefore, is to examine what may be referred to as the
historic pointers spotted in the movie and set one or two records straight, which illustrate part of
the arguments in this particular study. While it may appear, as earlier mentioned, that the film is
inherently a “tribute to love…that holds people together” as Chimamanda Adichie aptly describes
it,
5
we are, nonetheless, particularly entranced by some of the scenes in the movie knitted around
three historically defining events: the First Republic (1960-1966), the January (1966) coup and, of
course, the civil war a year after (1967-1970). This nonetheless, is fitting to state here that the
exercise below is linked in many ways to the fate of the film in the hands of Nigeria’s film
regulator, hence the review below.
Comparatively, the film and novel are distances apart particularly in terms of character
roles. For instance, in the novel, Odenigbo’s houseboy, Ugwu was the main narrator but was made
inconspicuous in the movie, while Kainene and Olanna took centre stage. Also, the two main
political actors mentioned in the novel were subjected to nearly invisible characters in the movie.
Although this may have been deliberate, it is possible that the director may have been coerced by
the regulatory agency into making a film with ‘unseen’ characters as against their perceptible
manifestations in the novel, which shall be discussed subsequently. Interestingly, the reception by
Nigerians to both the novel and film appear ambivalent. However, for a country whose youth
population did not witness the civil war but is firmly drawn to the movie industry (Nollywod), the
5
Adichie stated in an interview that in her novel her intention was “to write about love and war” while the
film’s director, Biyi Bandele suggests that the movie is “a love letter to Nigeria’s very complex and
complicated history.” Incidentally, posters made for the Nigerian premiere was captioned: “Divided by war,
united by love.”
19
Nigerian attitude to the film would have been seen strictly in terms of its artistic verve, captivating
storyline, and visual creativity.
We begin with what I term the coup jaw-jaw, where we are introduced to the scene of the
announcement of a coup over the radio and discussions around it by Professor Odenigbo, Ms.
Adebayo, Olanna, Okeoma, and two others.
6
As it appeared, these discussions, political in colour
were regularly hosted on weekends at the instance of Odenigbo with a coterie of multi-ethnic
intellectuals from the University of Nsukka. Viewers, here, see the loud-talking, hyperactive
Odenigbo, as Adichie labelled him, in his archetypical revolutionary verve, visibly excited about
the coup announcement and then respond immediately by assuming the coup was simply the end
of corruption. His colleague Okeoma soon reacted with the indication that the coup plotters were
“true heroes” but Ms. Adebayo seemed indifferent. Though quoting the BBC, which suggested
that the event was an ‘Igbo coup,’ she calmly agreed since, according to her, “it was mostly
Northerners who were killed.” Another colleague, who albeit did not openly validate the former’s
position, believed this could have been true given that “it was mostly Northerners in government,”
suggesting further that no one else would have felt the brunt except Northerners. Odenigbo, on the
other hand, countered the Igbo coup tag and wondered why the BBC, in obvious reference to its
owners the British government did not ask “who put the Northerners in government to dominate
everybody.” He went further to eulogise Major Nzeogwu, arguing that Nigeria would have been a
better place under his leadership. In the midst of the discussion, a white American colleague asked
if Nzeogwu was a communist.
The plot here is an excellent reminder of the shades of opinion expressed across the country
in the aftermath of the January 1966 coup. Odenigbo’s excitement on hearing the coup over the
radio would appear as though he was supportive of his kinsmen for plotting the so-called Igbo
coup. This may not have been true.
7
The fact that there is only little evidence that the coup plotters
had a grand Igbo agenda; extensive interviews of some of the coup participants and eyewitness
accounts
8
suggest that the coup was indeed, pan-Nigerian.
9
In fact, the event has been greeted with
excitement and unwavering approval among Nigerians
10
and thus, illustrates Decalo’s contention
6
The author has deliberately used the names of the cast throughout the study to avoid any mix-up.
7
There are suggestions that some Igbo politicians had prior knowledge of the coup and thus, took
precautions to save their lives. Nnamdi Azikiwe is often pointed as a typical example. Though evidence
suggest that Azikiwe was targeted for murder by the Majors, he had, nevertheless, taken a lengthy medical
leave abroad on doctor’s advice with prior knowledge and approval from the Prime Minister, Tafawa
Balewa. See Max Siollun, Oil, Politics and Violence: Nigeria’s Military Coup Culture (1966–1976) (New
York: Algora Publishing, 2009), 68 and 80.
8
“January 15, 1966 Coup: Why they called it an Igbo Coup – Mbazulike Amechi,” Vanguard, January 15,
2016.
9
Siollun, Oil, Politics and Violence, 141; New Nigerian, January 18, 1966; Newswatch, January 8, 1990;
Guardian, May 06, 2007.
10
Chinua Achebe, There was a Country: A Personal History of Biafra (New York: Penguin Books, 2012),
Siollun, Oil, Politics and Violence, 57.
20
that the coup was a symptom of “developmental strains and stress” in the Nigerian political
system.
11
By the end of 1965, the country was on the brink of a political crisis and some called for
a military solution for some sanity to reign. Still, the idea that corruption had finally come to an
end following the coup was not totally out of place. This is because politics of the First Republic,
if we go by a commentator’s view, was inherently centred on material gain; making money and
living.”
12
It was clear to the coup plotters and keen observers of the period that the political class
had not only corrupted the country ‘by their words and deeds’ and for some, needed to be gunned
down,
13
but also it divided the country into ethnic lines for self-serving purposes. As nepotism and
tribalism heightened, it became clear why the country remained tense. While it is not for us to
suggest whether or not the coup plotters were ‘heroes’, although echoes across the country implied
so,
14
the belief that Northerners were the major casualties of the coup
15
and that they had
‘dominated’ the government appears somewhat valid.
16
Following up with the interpretations of the paragraph above, the depiction of Okonji in
the film as a terrified man who “shit in his trousers before they shot him” may have been
exaggerated; yet, his portrayal as a corrupt government official may not have appeared so in reality,
particularly in light of recent revelations.
17
Also, the question of whether Nzeogwu was a
communist to have inspired such a bloody coup was reminiscent of the fears among Western
powers, especially Britain
18
who did much to sabotage any communist efforts or sympathies in the
country.
19
Of course, the ideological gulf between the Eastern and Western blocs continued into
11
Samuel Decalo, Military Coups and Military Regimes in Africa, JMAS 11, no. 1 (1973): 108.
12
Michael M. Ogbeidi, Political Leadership and Corruption in Nigeria Since 1960: A Socio-economic
Analysis, Journal of Nigeria Studies 1/2 (Fall 2012): 6.
13
Daily Telegraph, January 22, 1966.
14
Akachi Odoemene, “Ethnic Balkanization in Nigeria-Biafra War Narratives,” in Writing the Nigeria-
Biafra War, eds. Toyin Falola and Ogechukwu Ezekwem (New York: Boydell & Brewer Inc., 2016), 184.
15
Toyin Falola and Matthew M. Heaton, A History of Nigeria (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
2008), 173.
16
Siollun's rich appendix provides us with details about the arguments of northern domination between
January 14 and 15, 1967. See Siollun, Oil, Politics and Violence, 219-226.
17
See Akinjide Osuntokun, Festus Samuel Okotie-Eboh: in Time and Space, ed. (Ibadan: B Editions, 2016).
For a contrary view, see Harold Smith, A Squalid End to Empire: British Retreat from Africa (Libertas,
1987).
18
Otigbu F. Ogwugwua, “Osita Agwuna: A Study in Biography” (B.A. Long Essay, Lagos State University,
1992), 16. Also see American Consulate General Despatch No 118. March 08, 1950; British National
Archives (BNA): KV2/1818/422256 “Benjamin Nnamdi Azikiwe, alias Zik, Nigerian: independence leader
suspected of having communist sympathies at various points in his political carrier” and G. O. Olusanya,
The Zikist Movement A Study in Political Radicalism, JMAS 4/3 (1966), pp.323-333.
19
Segun O. Osoba, “The Transition to Neo-Colonialism,” in Britain and Nigeria: Exploitation or
Development? ed. Toyin Falola (London: Zed Books Ltd., 1987), 239; Edwin O. Madunagu, The Tragedy
of the Nigerian Socialist Movement (Calabar: Centaur Press, 1980).
21
the 1950s and 1960s, and it was expected that both blocs would, with their last drop of blood,
protect their sphere of influence against communist or capitalist infiltrations as the case may be. It
is, therefore, understood why the American in the movie raised the question, even though
Odenigbo erroneously believed that Nigerians did not have the time to worry about such concern.
20
On our next pointer is what I have tagged ethnopolitical chauvinism, where Olanna at the
Kano Airport was accosted by possibly an air-bound passenger, who quickly offered her a
newspaper to read the bulging headline on the back cover about the removal of the Igbo Vice-
Chancellor (VC) of the University of Lagos. It was obvious that this passenger was of Yoruba
origin and typically echoing similar sentiments among people in the Southwestern part of the
country on the tense situation at the University. The removal of the Igbo VC by the government in
1965 had pitched the university Senate against Council over the appointment of a new VC who
incidentally was Yoruba.
21
While we may not be able to explain the extent and depth of the
abysmal situation,
22
our contention here is that such removal in some quarters was perceived to
have been exercised in bad faith. Also, it is argued that the replacement reeked of ethnic
favouritism. It is against this backdrop that the air-bound passenger, perhaps an academic himself
like Olanna, must have made such uncomplimentary remark with such revulsion that the Igbo had
a unique problem of ‘dominance’ and often chose to “control everything in th[e] country.” Not
finished yet, he accused the Igbo of owning “all the shops” and controlling “the civil service, [and]
even the police.” For him, the mention of keda (how are you) was simple enough to set a criminal
of Igbo descent free. All the same, our air-bound passenger was deeply embarrassed to know
Olanna was Igbo, having corrected him on his mispronunciation of the word keda. As it seemed,
the former had thought all along he was speaking with a Fulani, whom he assumed appeared like
one. The crisis at the University of Lagos assumed a new meaning as rumours spread that the
‘deposed’ VC, ‘typical of the average Igbo, wanted to perpetuate himself even after he had been
asked to leave, an action aimed at fanning the embers of discord at the university. While this may
not be the true picture of things, it was, nevertheless, clear that the crisis had shades of ethnicity
and favouritism. The new VC was alleged to have been sympathetic to the government of the day.
Indeed, at a time of extreme tribal loyalties in the Southwestern region, on the one hand, and across
20
There were several instances where federal ministers dating back to 1961 expressed fear and worry about
crushing consequences from the West for attempting to enact policies that were deemed pro-communist.
See Segun Osoba, The Deepening Crisis of the Nigerian National Bourgeoisie, Review of African
Political Economy, 5/13 (1978): 64.
21
Larry J. Diamond, Class, Ethnicity and Democracy in Nigeria: The Failure of the First Republic (New
York: Syracuse University Press, 1988), 249.
22
For more light on this controversy, see Roland Ogbonnaya, “Forty Years of Unilag,” Thisday, November
13, 2002, accessed on May 15, 2019, https://allafrica.com/stories/200211130556.html. Diamond, Class,
Ethnicity and Democracy in Nigeria, 249.
22
the federation, on the other hand, it was not unexpected that all government-appointed seven
Yoruba members of the Provisional Council would endorse the removal of the former VC, while
replacing him with a politically and ethnically sympathetic figure. Incidentally, as the university
is centred in Yorubaland, it would naturally be perceived among interest groups as a Yoruba
university although the institution was federal-owned and should necessarily not be run based on
ethnic considerations.
23
The film takes us to the scene where Odenigbo, in his characteristic revolutionary outburst,
vents his anger at Ms. Adebayo, accusing her Yoruba kinsmen of conspiracy against the Igbo and
giving tactical silence to the pogrom in the north. I have coined this particular scene collegiate
wrangling. Odenigbo had wondered in anger why their university colleagues in Ibadan and Zaria
remained silent when foreign officials “encouraged the killing of Igbo. The latter accusation was
made in connection with the Kano Airport killing of Igbos by supposed Northern military officers
as depicted in the film. Whether or not foreigners emboldened the killings in Kano remains
debatable. While the killing at the airport was a fact, the depiction of silence among academics
specifically in Ibadan and other universities in the Southwest was absolutely inaccurate.
24
An
instance suffices here: in the event leading to secession, Yakubu Gowon, who had vowed to “crush
the rebellion” met stiff disapproval among Yoruba intellectuals for such hostile language. While
the Vice-Chancellor of the University of Ife (now Obafemi Awolowo University, Ife), Professor
Hezekiah Oluwasanmi, described such words as unfortunate, Justice Kayode Eso of the Western
Court of Appeal claimed the statement was not the path to making Nigeria one.
25
Similarly, Wole
Soyinka was held in prison for his alleged sympathy for Biafra, while Fela Anikulapo in the song,
Viva Nigeria’ argued for a united Nigeria.
26
Not done yet, Odenigbo faces Ms. Adebayo directly with an indicting statement, saying
had she not been in Igboland, she too would have kept silent at the killings. Perhaps, this scene
creates the impression that an earlier conversation had been ongoing between the two academics
if we are to critically weigh the latter’s firm response. Having been accused of expressing little or
no sympathy (for the Igbo), Ms. Adebayo, who strongly believed that “secession is not the only
way to security also claimed her firm position, did not reduce her sympathy for those brutally
murdered in the North. Odenigbo, who suddenly became overtly abrasive and appeared not to have
23
Levi A. Nwachuku and G.N. Uzoigwe, Troubled Journey: Nigeria since the Civil War, eds. (Maryland:
University Press of America, 2004), 27.
24
Quite surprisingly, the University of Ibadan in collaboration with the Christopher Okigbo Foundation
recently celebrated 50 years of Okigbo’s death at the Trenchard Hall of the university where Okigbo once
taught. See Omiko Awa, “Celebrating Legacies of Okigbo 50 Years After,” Guardian, October 01, 2017.
25
Damola Awoyokun, “Biafra: The Untold Story of Nigeria’s Civil War Part 1, Biafra memorial, 27
September 2013, accessed October 15, 2017, http://www.biaframemorial.org/biafra-the-untold-story-of-
nigerias-civil-war-part-1/
26
Paul Nugent, Africa since Independence: A Comparative History (Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan,
2012), 99.
23
had enough, accused Yoruba chiefs of visiting the emirs in the North to thank them for sparing
the Yoruba people.” This claim, as it were, flies in the face of evidence given by one Mr. Strong,
US consul in Ibadan at the time, who had close interactions with some of the Yoruba intelligentsia.
He claimed that the Yoruba ‘intellectuals’ and ‘modernizers’ found the civil war not only
objectionable and suspiciously conceived as part of the North’s agenda to dominate the South, but
also expressed fear that, should the East be subdued by the North, the West would follow suit.
27
What this illustrates is that rather than go to war, a peaceful resolution should be pursued, and that
in the event of any knowledge of Eastern domination, the Yoruba would similarly take to
secession. Also, Yoruba chiefs had no reason to travel North to thank its emirs for not killing the
Yoruba. This is because the central government was adequately represented by Chief Obafemi
Awolowo, a Yoruba, who was equally as powerful throughout and after the war period, and whose
leadership position would necessarily have allayed fears in the Southwest of any Northern
domination of the region.
Furthermore, Odenigbo’s accusation that the Yoruba people in Lagos killed Igbos may not
be true, at least, based on the spatial outlook of the city.
28
While we do not dispute the fact that
Igbos were killed in Lagos, we are, nonetheless, of the view that these attacks were mild unlike
in the North, which was calculated and widespread and could not be pinned on one particular
ethnic group.
29
For instance, Christopher Okigbo on his return to Ibadan from Lagos in August
1966 was nearly killed on his way to Ikeja Airport by soldiers led by one Corporal Paul Dickson.
30
Whether Dickson was Yoruba is not readily known, but the claim by Edith Ike-Okongu, Yakubu
Gowon’s Igbo partner, of allegedly being threatened in Lagos twice since her swift return in March
from the North (by unknown persons) proves Odenigbo’s position weak as to his indictment of the
Yoruba
31
but tenable within the context of the killings in Lagos.
32
Though other historic pointers in the film can be covered for critical study,
33
we cannot
sufficiently capture them in one article. Yet, what we have been done here is to put to stringent
27
Awoyokun, Biafra: The Untold Story”.
28
Lagos was the seat of power at the time and it was a cosmopolitan city with diverse group of peoples
engaged in commercial enterprises.
29
The author is grateful to Prof. Siyan Oyeweso of the Department of History & International Studies, Osun
State University, Osogbo, for this vital information.
30
Obi Nwakanma, Christopher Okigbo, 1930-67: Thirsting for Sunlight (Suffolk: James Currey, 2010),
223.
31
Two cases are apt for citation here: While Ojukwu's sister was provided sanctuary in one Dr. Oshodi’s
house, a Yoruba, Achebe, who was suspected and haunted by the military for having foreknowledge of the
"Igbo coup", following the publication of the book, A Man of the People, took cover with his family in a
hideout for several weeks in Lagos before finding his way to the East. See Siollun, Oil, Politics and
Violence, 137 and 135.
32
It is probable that few killings in Lagos were carried out by military officers largely of northern origin.
33
The Kano Airport killing is a typical case here. For details on this, see “Massacre in Kano,” Time
Magazine, October 14, 1966. See also, Siollun, Oil, Politics and Violence, 135.
24
textual analysis some of the manifestations of Nigeria’s somewhat ‘tempestuous’ past as conveyed
in Half of a Yellow Sun, although a fraction of the narratives built around the film appear
ambivalent. This may have been a deliberate attempt by the director to downplay the more realistic
imaginations of the Biafra war firmly depicted in the original work by Adichie. Interestingly,
Adichie’s view that “major political events in the book are ‘factually’ correct”, appear to be totally
true, yet few of these events depicted in the film proved historically fictive.
34
It is also possible
that this may have been influenced by the Censors Board’s request to the producers to remove
some scenes from the movie before it is given certification. The historic pointers examined above
has, therefore, sufficiently clarified a few of the inaccuracies in the account of the civil war
presented in the film. In any case, not minding if the film is considered “stately and sluggish,”
35
the film represents one of the boldest contemporary attempts since the civil war, at evoking
memories of that brutal past in Nigeria’s history. Beyond this, it serves as a reminder of the noxious
legacy bequeathed by British colonial rule which heightened deep-seated divisions among
Africans, causing rapid destruction of democratic institutions at independence and brutal wars that
are still sources of contention today.
36
An Art Troubled from the Start
In a blistering article, renowned author Ayo Sogunro paints a lucid picture of how the
political configuration of the Nigerian state was specifically structured to ‘kill all of us’.
37
The
impression given here is that there is often a deliberate attempt by known or invisible forces to put
a roadblock to any fruitful venture in the country. The Nigerian state, he argues further, operates
an acutely dysfunctional system which offers little regard for its anguished citizens.
38
Perhaps, the promoters of Half of a Yellow Sun were unaware of this basic characteristic
nature of the country and with little or no grasp of what to confront when preparations began for
the film’s production. Alternatively, they could have been aware of these roadblocks but
deliberately chose to ignore them. It could be that they similarly developed at some point what
Ayo Sogunro referred to as the ‘survival abilities’ to carry on their task without hindrance.
39
Had
the film’s promoters of the faintest idea that Half of a Yellow Sun would be problematic right from
conception, they would have exercised some discretion. Essentially, since the book itself was
wholly set in Nigeria, there was a need to give the film adaptation as much Nigerian colour as
possible. Producers deliberately employed the cast of international stars primarily to give the film
34
ChatAfrik Network, Half of a Yellow Sun by Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie, October 30, 2011, accessed
April 22, 2019, http://www.chatafrik.com/special/spotlight/interview/half-of-a-yellow-sun-by-
chimamanda-ngozi-adichie#.XMbyUKjTWyU.
35
Peter Bradshaw, “Half of a Yellow Sun Review – ‘Well-intentioned and Heartfelt,’” The Guardian, April
10, 2014.
36
Max Siollun, “How First Coup Still Haunts Nigeria 50 Years on,” BBC Africa, January 15, 2016.
37
Ayo Sogunro, Everything in Nigeria is going to Kill You (Nigeria: Shecrownlita Scribble, 2014).
38
Ibid.
39
Ibid.
25
an international outlook and possibly attract the global, particularly the Western, audience to a
Nigerian and African content and secondly to secure international sales for investors.
40
Similarly, instead of shooting the movie in more tested and familiar locations in East Africa
the producers selected Nigeria. They were “blazing a trail in a country that still scares off most
potential filmmakers and investors” and since they wanted “to give investors’ confidence in a
country that remains untested,” they picked international stars.
41
Because the film is about a part
of Nigeria and its peoples’ everyday struggles with a faltering postcolonial political superstructure,
it would have been counterproductive to shoot the film abroad. An account indicates that the
author, Adichie, had requested, should the book be adapted into a film, that the project must be
filmed in Nigeria.
42
In any case, as the most expensive film yet made in Nigeria,
43
and having committed quite
an impressive amount of human and material resources to the project, many had thought it would
witness a smooth sail. Indeed, as the promoters appeared hopeful, they had little idea of what
would soon confront them. By the time cameras were about to roll, typically unexpected
roadblocks set in as well. The movie director, Biyi Bandele, captured this aptly;
While shooting the film in Nigeria two years ago [2012], there were times
when we felt ensnared in impenetrable jungles of red tape, when we would
be given the go-ahead by one arm of the government only to find our path
blocked by the other arm.
44
The promoters had based its production in Calabar, the capital of Cross River state,
southeast Nigeria and used the Tinapa Studios and Creek Town throughout the shooting of the
film.
45
The studio, opened in 2007, fell into disuse few years later and this explains why the set
designer, Andrew McAlpine, had to fly in experts from abroad to build the set in three weeks.
There were serious challenges associated with the near absence of technical infrastructure. For
instance, aside from the fact that lighting and grip tools had to be shipped from abroad, clearing
them at customs were hampered by unnecessary bureaucracies which suspended production for a
week. Jungle Filmworks and Audio Visual Services, a Lagosbased production services company
extended support, but other local companies and service providers with expertise and logistics to
complete a Hollywood production were totally absent. Again, in terms of its core financing, the
40
“‘Yellow Sun’ Rises in West Africa,” Variety, July 28, 2012, accessed October 15, 2017,
http://www.variety.com/2012/film/news/yellow-sun-rises-in-west-africa-1118057146/
41
Ibid.
42
Sidique Bah, “Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie,” Salt Magazine, February 27, 2014, accessed May 15, 2019,
http://www.saltmagazine.org/chimamanda-ngozi-adichie/.
43
Luchina Fisher, “Nigerian Film Industry Reaches Mainstream,” ABC News, May 09, 2014.
44
Biyi Bandele, “Why Can’t Nigerians see Half of a Yellow Sun?” Premium Times, May 23, 2014, accessed
May 15, 2019, https://www.premiumtimesng.com/opinion/161373-cant-nigerians-see-half-yellow-sun-
biyi-bandele.html.
45
A scene in the movie was shot in London.
26
investment banker invited to seek funding for the film claimed that only ten percent of the budget
was raised at the start of shooting in Nigeria. It would take four years before a fund was created to
attract mainly local investors to finance the production.
46
Indeed, the filmmaker was said to have described the film location as apocalyptic and in
fact, a significant number of the cast and crew fell ill from typhoid and malaria.
47
Bandele was
himself down with Type 2 diabetes during the 33-day filming. Notwithstanding the challenges and
nightmares, the filming of Half of a Yellow Sun was eventually concluded but once again faced
even more unpleasant difficulties.
Driving a Stake through its Heart?
This section of the study discusses the perceived persistent denial of the political class to
spur debates on the civil war. What we are attempting to do here is to look beyond the popular
narratives at the time and see if Half of a Yellow Sun was deliberately fingered by the government
for prohibition as a result of the film’s content or lest it was part of the usual grand conspiracy to
keep it out of circulation by political agencies. We shall take a look at the positions of both the
Censor Board and the film’s promoters to properly understand if politics was at play or if the latter
had been guided by professional conducts.
At the premiere of the movie at the Toronto International Film Festival in September 2013,
the Executive Director of the Censor Board at the time, Ms. Patricia Bala and her entourage were
gladly present, and claims made that she was generally satisfied with the film. Indeed, the film had
been premiered in Lagos on April 12, 2014, and to reach a wider audience, was scheduled for
release two weeks later, precisely on April 25, 2014, when suddenly the Censor Board openly
opposed such a move. According to the Board, selected parts of the film contained some
objections, which needed to be resolved to conform to the laws and regulations and so certification
was not approved. Did the ‘laws’ and ‘regulations’ that would help resolve the issue conform to
those guiding Censor Board or superior to them? Answers remain hazy. In any case, the Censor
Board may not have committed any crime in delaying or pending the premiering of the film, since
the enabling act provides overwhelming powers to the Board to censure films not only believed to
undermine national security and found “undesirable in the public interest, but also ones likely
to “incite or encourage public disorder or crime.
48
Hostilities between the film’s promoters and the Board began when it was alleged that the
latter had ‘banned’ the film. The allegations stemmed from the fact that the Board had not only
watched the movie at Toronto, but also expressed deep satisfaction with it. The general public,
46
“‘The Making of Half of a Yellow Sun Movie’ Executive Producer, Yewande Sadiku,” Encomium
Magazine, April 06, 2014. http://encomium.ng/the-making-of-half-of-a-yellow-sun-movie-executive-
producer-yewande-sadiku/ accessed May 15, 2019.
47
Jenny Soffel, “‘Half of a Yellow Sun: Thandie Newton, Typhoid and a Tale of Civil War, CNN, October
21, 2013, accessed May 15, 2019. http://www.cnn.com/2013/10/21/showbiz/half-of-a-yellow-
sun/index.html.
48
See Section 36 (1) (b) of the NFVCB Enabling Law ACT 1993, CAP N40 LFN 2004.
27
who had also joined in the debate, indicated that the Board had chosen to censure the movie
because it feared ethnic conflicts may erupt.
49
There was no doubt, indeed, that the former was re-
echoing similar sentiments by the latter which, in a statement claimed that its position towards the
film was in pure terms “a routine procedure…underpinned by the superior logic of safeguarding
[the] public interest.”
50
The movie director Biyi Bandele, one of the most vocal critics of the Board
was alleged to have pushed the narrative of a ‘ban’ into the mainstream, but openly accused the
latter’s stiff-position against certification of the film as “a clumsy, heavy-handed ban in all but
name.”
51
The question which arises here: was the film truly banned as claimed by Bandele and
many others, or was the film’s delay by the censors board a knee-jerk political response to what
it believed were the film’s depictions of ethnically-motivated violence? Ms. Bala, and the Board
in a separate press statement released to clarify the allegations, claimed that the film was NEVER
banned and that such a word did not emanate from the Board.
52
Ms. Bala also noted that as standard
practice, movies that were deemed controversial were forwarded to the security agencies (DSS and
Police) for a second and sometimes, a third opinion, whose advice in most cases guides the Board
in their final decision to either ban or certify a movie. She cited an instance where popular Nigerian
movie producer, Helen Ukpabio’s film, Rapture was banned by the Board based on the advice
from the security agencies.
53
The author, however, learnt that the Board received several cases of
films depicting scenes about persons representing a movement abroad, who travelled to Nigeria to
bomb certain targets in the country, but were advised by the security agencies to be banned. The
yardstick that certifies a film controversial was, however, not stated.
As mentioned earlier, there were indications that the Board had given strong support for
the film at Toronto. This may not have been true, given the position by the head of the Board’s
49
Some others claimed the movie was censured because of its nudity. See Onyinye Muomah, “Nigerian
Film Board Delays Showing of Half of a Yellow Sun,” Premium Times, April 25, 2014.
50
Caesar O. Kagbo, “Regulatory Agency Writes Exhibitor of ‘Half of a Yellow Sun”, NFVCB Press
Release, June 19, 2014.
51
Mr. Bandele initially agreed to sit for an interview for this article but later on he referred the author to
FilmOne Distribution Limited, distributor of Half of a Yellow Sun. During the author’s brief interview with
Ms. Patricia Bala, she accused Mr. Bandele of selling the idea of a ‘ban’ to the mainstream media. Bandele,
nonetheless, disagreed, claiming that his reactions to all the issues came in response to journalists quoting
her, or claiming to be quoting her. Interview with Ms Patricia Bala on October 19, 2017; Bandele, “Why
Can’t Nigerians see Half of a Yellow Sun?”
52
Interview with Ms. Patricia Bala on October 19, 2017. Though Ms. Bala recently left the Board, her
responses to the author’s questions were made not in personal capacity but as that of a former Board
Executive Director. She later referred the author to direct questions to the NFVCB, refusing to go further
with the interview. Kogba, “Regulatory Agency Writes Exhibitor of ‘Half of a Yellow Sun”,
53
Paul Ugor, “Censorship and the Content of Nigerian Home Video Films”, Postcolonial Text 3/1, (2007):
12. The author learnt that the Board received several cases of films depicting scenes about persons
representing a movement abroad who travelled to Nigeria to bomb certain targets in the country but was
advised by the security agencies to be banned.
28
delegation, who claimed to have expressed quiet reservations, having watched the premiering and
manifested same when a filmmaker privately conveyed similar sentiments to her.
54
It must,
nevertheless, be stated that this reservation was not about the film’s storyline as the head of the
delegation claimed, but its production or technical quality. It would appear that Ms. Bala, from all
that had occurred at Toronto, decided to pursue a vendetta on return to Nigeria. This also may not
be correct. The Board’s Film Censorship and Classification department had been given the usual
task of carrying out an in-house review of the film and seemed to have expressed parallel
reservations as the Board’s head. It was based on this, therefore, that the Board decided to further
the process by forwarding the film for a second opinion.
Having established the above positions, we are compelled to ask two pertinent questions.
One, was it possible that the so-called second opinion the security agencies could have
expressed hidden prejudices against the film or its promoters in any way, given the heated
conversation the delay had generated in public? We are likely to have no concrete answer to this,
being that such tasks among security agencies are pursued discreetly. In any case, it is probable
that the security agencies that are not adequately trained on ‘artistic’ matters of this nature acted
based on the political atmosphere of the time. For a country renowned for pre- and post-election
tensions, a film depicting war and reminding citizens of its brutal past, although the central theme
was about love, may not have been positively received. Two, should there have been any form of
pressure at the top level of government, was this decision based on the second opinion and
ultimately the Board’s discretion? Indeed, public opinion somehow influenced the eventual release
of the film. In correspondences between the Board and FilmOne Distribution, the Board had
requested the latter to edit certain scenes in the movie. Though the distributor in a meeting held on
June 18, 2014, with the Board explained the financial consequences of having to edit, re-master,
and reprint and “its resultant effect on the commercial viability of the film’s cinema release in
Nigeria”,
55
these requirements were judiciously carried out. It was at this juncture that the Board
later claimed no further response was received which may have spurred additional regulatory
actions. They also noted that once this was effectively done, ratings would be communicated
appropriately.
56
Although FilmOne expressed its dismay at the Board’s posturing, both parties
eventually arrived at a settlement. It is possible, however, that the Board’s claim that it had not
received any response from the distributor may have been a reputation-saving gesture, particularly
it was likely that no prompt second and even third opinion was immediately received. Second,
there were indications that two powerful government ministers mounted undue pressures on the
Board to release the film, but the latter ensured that it awaited the expert opinion of the security
54
Ms. Bala claimed that despite her strong reservations, she refused to express them to the foreign press in
Toronto in order not to give a wrong impression or paint the promoters and Nigeria in negative light.
55
For Press Statement by Kene Mkparu see, BellaNaija.com, “Half of a Yellow Sun” Distributor replies
NFVCB In New Statement” June 20, 2014. https://www.bellanaija.com/2014/06/hoays-distributor-replies-
nfvcb-in-new-statement/ accessed May 15, 2019.
56
NFVCB Press Release.
29
agencies before acting on the status of the film in line with all the available options explored.
Therefore, it is clear that neither the public pressure nor government influence but rather the
opinion of security agencies and the Board’s discretion together played a decisive role in the
eventual release of the film for public viewing.
It appears that the Board did not act in the interest of the film’s promoters, particularly its
largely Nigerian investors. Negative reactions to the Board spread in some parts of the country,
causing reactions that the board members were not sufficiently ‘enlightened’ to handle such a
sensitive case and they were ridiculed.
57
A common notion within the Board and in movie industry
circles suggests that the filmmakers did not follow due process and were simply interested in
making a profit. This may not have been the case; it is likely that beyond the ‘security’ thesis, the
Board’s decision to deny certification to the film was informed by global practices where
classification and censorship decisions are hinged on the cultures, beliefs, and attitudes of the
society.
58
Half of a Yellow Sun, Censorship and National Contestations
Being the most expensive film in Nigeria at the time and one of the few movies in the
history of the film industry adapted from an award-winning novel, starring an array of national
and international stars, the movie created high expectations among Nigerians from all walks of
life. The news of a banning or non-certification of the film, therefore, led to series of rumours,
national debates/conversations and suspicions across the country. In a blistering article in The
Guardian, Chibundu Onuzo argued that through the film, Nigeria needed to openly debate
contesting accounts of her past and together come up with a consensus account on the civil war.
59
On Twitter, debates around unnecessary censorship, secessionism, ethnic-inspired pride among
other conversations emerged following the actions of the Board. For instance, Lotanna 'Femi O.
tweeting from the handle @TheLotanna, noted: “But it’s sad though that large parts of the movie
was allegedly chopped to ‘preserve our unity.’ Really stupid if that's true.” Bolaji Olatunde from
the handle @BOLMOJOLA said: “At the climax of the film, an Igbo lady to my left said, ‘We
don’t belong to this country.’ Mr. Censor, the film didn’t inspire that.” While a tweet from
@SantinoED claimed: Saw #HOAYS last weekend.. Never felt prouder being an Ibo man. We
did have to start from the bottom again.. Look where we are now..,” another by Alex (Oba n'ame)
from @i_am_alexbrown said: #HOAYS really sold out today, My room was so full, chairs had
to be brought in.”
60
Civil society groups also waded into the conversation. The Human Rights
57
See, for instance, “The Miss World Tragedy,” Tell, December 09, 2002, 31.
58
James Fieser, Censorship: From Moral Issues that Divides Us, UTM, January 09, 2017, accessed
October 09, 2017, http://www.utm.edu/staff/jfieser/class/160/4-censorship.htm.
59
Chibundu Onuzo, “Nigeria’s History Problem Needs the Light from Half of a Yellow Sun,” The
Guardian, April 15, 2014.
60
All tweets cited from Resurrecting Biafra: Half of a Yellow Sun, Saharareporters, August 4, 2014,
accessed on April 12, 2019, http://www.saharareporters.com/2014/08/04/resurrecting-biafra-half-of-a-
yellow-sun
30
Writers Association (HURIWA), for example, argued that suspending Half of a Yellow Sun was
simply “an attempt to deny the historicity of the Nigerian-Biafran civil war” and “amounted to
‘genocidal denial’ reminiscent of dictatorial regimes.”
61
Apart from the inaccurate portrayal of historical events in the film and the debates that
sparked a national conversation against the backdrop of the Censors Board’s request for specific
scenes in Half of a Yellow Sun to be removed, there is a belief, particularly in the minds of many
in recent times that it was time for a film of this nature and several others to serve as a catalyst for
introspection and reflection on the Biafra war.
Conclusion
Although the author reached out to the Board several times for follow up interviews,
unfortunately, it was blocked in the bureaucratic bottleneck. However, popular Nigerian online
newspaper, YNaija interviewed an anonymous senior official at the Board on the issue; the senior
official cited the general insecurity in the country for the Board’s action to deny the film
certification. According to the official, Is it not our job to ensure films don’t cause chaos? No one
in government wants to be responsible for anything that happens now. The poor woman (Bala) is
just trying to protect herself. All this noise won’t change her mind, unless a higher authority steps
in.
62
When the above position is weighed side-by-side, it is possible that the Board was concerned
that the film may likely have unearthed latent hostilities in the country.
Though little evidence exists to show that the Board was deeply biased or that its actions
were exerted as part of a long political culture of silence over a heated issue as that of the Biafra
war, yet, as Adichie aptly indicated, the Board could have overlooked the politics or technicalities
and embraced the film simply for its art.
63
Here, it is likely that many movie followers would have
taken the film at face value with very little opportunities for second-guessing. In fairness to the
promoters, Half of a Yellow Sun appears to have no sinister motive in its indication to premiere the
film at the time it did. Indeed, there were fears that the film could be hit by piracy,
64
hence reasons
for the decision to premiere on time. This decision, unfortunately, coincided with a period of
serious regional and political tensions in the country. To be sure, the first half of 2014 witnessed a
dramatic upsurge in violence in the Northeast sparked by Boko Haram. As it were, about 270
young school girls were seized by the group from the remote town of Chibok in Borno State,
Nigeria. These events quickly sparked both a national and international outcry. It was in the midst
61
“Democracy Day: HURIWA wants Ban on Half of a Yellow Sun Lifted,” Point Blank News, May 28,
2014.
62
Chi Ibe, “Why ‘Half of a Yellow Sun’ is ‘banned’ by the Censors Board, DG ‘Expressed Strong
Reservations’,” YNaija, April 27, 2014, accessed April 12, 2019, https://ynaija.com/exclusive-why-half-a-
yellow-sun-is-banned-by-the-censors-board-dg-expressed-strong-reservations/
63
Chimamanda N. Adichie, “Hiding from our Past,” The New Yorker, May 01, 2014.
64
At the time the film was still being premiered in cinemas, several bootleg DVD copies of the film were
simultaneously sold for a meagre fee in the busy Lagos traffic. See Funsho Arogundade, “Lagos Pirates
Feast on Half of a Yellow Sun Movie,” PM News, August 18, 2014.
31
of these emotional outpouring and global outrage that Half of a Yellow Sun was billed to premiere.
In fact, the Chibok abduction occurred two days after the Lagos premiere of the film. Of course,
contrary to Ms. Bala’s position that the film’s release was a deliberate attempt to cause tension in
the country, nothing appeared to suggest so. Nevertheless, it is not improbable that some of the
‘grave’ scenes portrayed in the film may have likely “encourage[d] public disorders” as feared by
the Board.
While it is difficult to say exactly what the major consequences were for the film’s
promoters, either in terms of returns in profit or sustained investor confidence in Nollywood, it is
very much possible, even so, that the Censors Board’s actions may have driven a stake through the
heart of the Nigerian film industry. Questions will continue to be asked on why the security
agencies should be involved in deciding the fate of Nollywood movies and a work of fiction
generally, given that they are not well-equipped for the job. There are also beliefs in some quarters
that the Board does not have a deep and fitting understanding of ratings, censorship, and the film
industry generally.
65
Whatever the case, it would perhaps have augured well if a film of this nature
and other material expressions of the civil war had been used as a reference by the Nigerian state
to mark the recent 50th anniversary of the war. At a time when mutual suspicions continue to
heighten between peoples of the Eastern part of the country and leadership of the central
government, Half of a Yellow Sun may not only have helped to heal old wounds but also be a
useful tool to create a national reconciliation.
65
See Press Statement by Kene Mkparu.
32
Bibliography
Achebe, Chinua. There was a Country: A Personal History of Biafra. New York: Penguin Books, 2012.
Adichie, Chimamanda N. “Hiding from our Past,” The New Yorker, May 01, 2014.
Arogundade, Funsho. “Lagos Pirates Feast on Half of a Yellow Sun Movie,” PM News, August 18, 2014.
Awa, Omiko. “Celebrating Legacies of Okigbo 50 Years After,” Guardian, October 01, 2017.
Awoyokun, Damola. “Biafra: The Untold Story of Nigeria’s Civil War Part 1, Biafra memorial, 27
September 2013, accessed October 15, 2017, http://www.biaframemorial.org/biafra-the-untold-
story-of-nigerias-civil-war-part-1/.
Bandele, Biyi. “Why Can’t Nigerians see Half of a Yellow Sun?” Premium Times, May 23, 2014, accessed
May 15, 2019, https://www.premiumtimesng.com/opinion/161373-cant-nigerians-see-half-
yellow-sun-biyi-bandele.html.
Bah, Sidique. “Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie,” Salt Magazine, February 27, 2014, accessed May 15, 2019,
http://www.saltmagazine.org/chimamanda-ngozi-adichie/.
BellaNaija.com, “Half of a Yellow Sun” Distributor replies NFVCB In New Statement” June 20, 2014,
accessed May 15, 2019, https://www.bellanaija.com/2014/06/hoays-distributor-replies-nfvcb-in-
new-statement/
Bradshaw, Peter. “Half of a Yellow Sun Review ‘Well-intentioned and Heartfelt,’” The Guardian, April
10, 2014.
ChatAfrik Network, “Half of a Yellow Sun by Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie”, October 30, 2011, accessed
April 22, 2019, http://www.chatafrik.com/special/spotlight/interview/half-of-a-yellow-sun-by-
chimamanda-ngozi-adichie#.XMbyUKjTWyU.
Daily Telegraph, January 22, 1966.
Decalo, Samuel. Military Coups and Military Regimes in Africa, JMAS 11/1 (March 1973): pp.105-
127.
“Democracy Day: HURIWA wants Ban on Half of a Yellow Sun Lifted,” Point Blank News, May 28,
2014.
Diamond, Larry J. Class, Ethnicity and Democracy in Nigeria: The Failure of the First Republic. New
York: Syracuse University Press, 1988.
Fieser, James. Censorship: From Moral Issues that Divides Us, UTM, January 09, 2017, accessed
October 09, 2017, http://www.utm.edu/staff/jfieser/class/160/4-censorship.htm.
Fisher, Luchina. “Nigerian Film Industry Reaches Mainstream,” ABC News, May 09, 2014.
33
Falola, Toyin and Matthew M. Heaton. A History of Nigeria. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
2008.
Guardian, May 06, 2007.
Ibe, Chi. “Why ‘Half of a Yellow Sun’ is ‘banned’ by the Censors Board, DG ‘Expressed Strong
Reservations’,” YNaija, April 27, 2014, accessed April 12, 2019,
https://www.ynaija.com/exlclusive-why-half-a-yellow-sun-is-banned-by-the-censors-board-dg-
expressed-strong-reservations/.
“January 15, 1966 Coup: Why they called it an Igbo Coup – Mbazulike Amechi,” Vanguard, January 15,
2016.
Kagbo, Caesar O. “Regulatory Agency Writes Exhibitor of ‘Half of a Yellow Sun”, NFVCB Press
Release, June 19, 2014.
Madunagu, Edwin O. The Tragedy of the Nigerian Socialist Movement. Calabar: Centaur Press, 1980.
“‘The Making of Half of a Yellow Sun Movie’ Executive Producer, Yewande Sadiku,” Encomium
Magazine, April 06, 2014, accessed May 15, 2019, http://encomium.ng/the-making-of-half-of-a-
yellow-sun-movie-executive-producer-yewande-sadiku/.
“Massacre in Kano,” Time Magazine, October 14, 1966.
“The Miss World Tragedy,” Tell, December 09, 2002.
Muomah, Onyinye. “Nigerian Film Board Delays Showing of Half of a Yellow Sun,” Premium Times,
April 25, 2014.
New Nigerian, January 18, 1966.
Newswatch, January 8, 1990.
Nixon, Charles R. “Self-Determination: The Nigeria/Biafra Case”, World Politics 24/4 (1972): 473-497.
Nugent, Paul. Africa since Independence: A Comparative History. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.
Nwachuku, Levi A. and G.N. Uzoigwe, Troubled Journey: Nigeria since the Civil War, ed. Maryland:
University Press of America, 2004.
Nwaiwu, Chimaobi. Pandemonium as Police, MASSOB Clash during 16th Anniversary Service,
Vanguard, September 14, 2015.
Nwakanma, Obi. Christopher Okigbo, 1930-67: Thirsting for Sunlight. Suffolk: James Currey, 2010.
Odoemene, Akachi. “Ethnic Balkanization in Nigeria-Biafra War Narratives,” in Writing the Nigeria-
Biafra War, eds. Toyin Falola and Ogechukwu Ezekwem. New York: Boydell & Brewer Inc.,
2016.
34
Ogbeidi, Michael M. Political Leadership and Corruption in Nigeria Since 1960: A Socio-economic
Analysis, Journal of Nigeria Studies 1/2 (Fall 2012): pp.1-25.
Ogbonnaya, Roland. “Forty Years of Unilag,” Thisday, November 13, 2002, accessed on May 15, 2019,
https://allafrica.com/stories/200211130556.html .
Ogwugwua, Otigbu F. “Osita Agwuna: A Study in Biography” B.A. Long Essay, Lagos State University,
1992.
Olusanya, Gabriel O. The Zikist Movement A Study in Political Radicalism, JMAS 4/3 (1966) pp.323-
333.
Onyejiuwa, George. “South East Marginalisation Started with Gowon’s Regime”, Sun Newspaper,
November 13, 2018.
Onuzo, Chibundu. “Nigeria’s History Problem Needs the Light from Half of a Yellow Sun,” The
Guardian, April 15, 2014.
Osoba, Segun. The Deepening Crisis of the Nigerian National Bourgeoisie, Review of African Political
Economy 5/13 (1978): pp.63-77.
Osoba, Segun O. “The Transition to Neo-Colonialism,” pp.223-242 in Britain and Nigeria: Exploitation
or Development? Edited by Toyin Falola. London: Zed Books Ltd., 1987.
Osuntokun, Akinjide. Festus Samuel Okotie-Eboh: in Time and Space, ed. Ibadan: B Editions, 2016.
Resurrecting Biafra: Half of a Yellow Sun, Saharareporters, August 4, 2014, accessed on April 12,
2019, http://www.saharareporters.com/2014/08/04/resurrecting-biafra-half-of-a-yellow-sun.
Siollun, Max. Oil, Politics and Violence: Nigeria’s Military Coup Culture (1966–1976). New York:
Algora Publishing, 2009.
Siollun, Max. “How First Coup Still Haunts Nigeria 50 Years on,” BBC Africa, January 15, 2016.
Smith, Harold. A Squalid End to Empire: British Retreat from Africa. Libertas, 1987.
Soffel, Jenny. “‘Half of a Yellow Sun’: Thandie Newton, Typhoid and a Tale of Civil War,” CNN, October
21, 2013, accessed May 15, 2019, http://www.cnn.com/2013/10/21/showbiz/half-of-a-yellow-
sun/index.html.
Sogunro, Ayo. Everything in Nigeria is going to Kill You. Nigeria, Shecrownlita Scribble, 2014.
Ugor, Paul. Censorship and the Content of Nigerian Home Video Films, Postcolonial Text 3/1, (2007):
pp.1-22.
Uphoff, Norman Thomas and Harold Ottemoeller, After the Nigerian Civil War: With Malice toward
Whom? Africa Today, 17/2 (1970): pp. 1-4.
35
“‘Yellow Sun’ Rises in West Africa,” Variety, July 28, 2012, accessed October 15, 2017,
http://www.variety.com/2012/film/news/yellow-sun-rises-in-west-africa-1118057146/.
... In September 2013, the film premièred at the Toronto International Film Festival with rave reviews. The then Executive Director of NFVCB, Ms Patricia Bala, was present at the festival and was reported to have been full of praises for the film (Oluwafunminiyi, 2019). However, after it premiered in Lagos on April 12, 2014, it was scheduled for release on April 25, 2014. ...
... Similarly, Adedipe (2018) insists that the book, Half of a Yellow Sun, represents an audacious attempt to rescue the Biafra story after many years of suppression. His view is further amplified by Oluwafunminiyi (2019), who argues that the film illustrates one of the attempts at reenacting the past in such a manner that valuable discussions regarding Nigeria's current challenges and perhaps forging ways of engendering national reconciliation could be catalysed. Even though the film was not entirely set in the war but in the love life of two sisters within the period of the conflict, the regulators believed that the film could trigger a nationwide violent reaction. ...
Article
Full-text available
Diverse scholarly and artistic expressions in book form and documentary films have been employed to document the story of the Nigerian Civil War by persons who were actively or peripherally involved in the events surrounding it. Attempts at telling the story have been coloured by different factors like military, political, ethno religious and egocentric considerations. This study examined the war's account through Biyi Bandele’s Half of a Yellow Sun, a filmic adaptation of Chimamanda Adichie’s novel with the same title. Using qualitative content analysis method and grounded on the Trauma and Cinema Theory, the study examined the film’s representation of historical facts and how such perspectives may have been received. The film's reception by the Nigerian cinema audience and government through the cinema regulatory authority were examined. The study concluded that the suppression of critical historical facts in the film through censorship represents the unwillingness of the government to allow for citizen conversation, which the film could provoke and which may lead to proper closure and possibly lay to rest, the ghost of the fratricidal war that almost ripped the country apart between July 1967 and January 1970.
Article
Full-text available
On the ‘Nigerian national bourgeoisie’. The term is used here in the sense in which Franz Fanon uses it in relation to the African national bourgeoisie or middle class in his chapter on ‘The pitfalls of national consciousness’ in his book, The Wretched of the Earth.It delineates the politico‐geographical context within which this class operates and it is not meant to confer on its members any attributes of patriotic national consciousness or of a capability to combat Euro‐American imperialism. The discussion in this essay clearly underscores the essentially comprador character of the Nigerian bourgeoisie most of whose members are either actually or potentially active collaborators with foreign monopoly capitalist interests in Nigeria.
Chapter
The Nigeria-Biafra War lasted from 6 July 1966 to 15 January 1970, during which time the post-colonial Nigerian state fought to bring the South-Eastern region, which had seceded as the State or Republic of Biafra, back into the newly independent but ideologically divided nation. This volume discusses the trends and methodologies in the civil war writings, both fictional and non-fictional, and is the first to analyse in detail the intellectual and historical circumstances that helped to shape these often contentious texts. The recent high-profile fictional account by Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie in Half of a Yellow Sun was preceded by works by Ken Saro-Wiwa, Elechi Amadi, Kole Omotoso, Wole Soyinka, Flora Nwapa, Buchi Emecheta, Chukwuemeka Ike and Chris Abani, all of which stronglyconvey the horrific human cost of the war on individuals and their communities. The non-fictional accounts, including Chinua Achebe's last work There Was a Country , are biographies, personal accounts and essays on the causes and course of the war, its humanitarian crises and the collaboration of foreign nations. The contributors examine writers' and protagonists' use of contemporary published texts as a means of continued resistance and justification of the war, the problems of objectivity encountered in memoirs, and how authors' backgrounds and sources determine the kinds of biases that influenced their interpretations, including the gendered divisions in Nigeria-Biafra War scholarship and sources. By initiating a dialogue on the civil war literature, this volume engages a much-needed discourse on the problems confronting a culturally diverse post-war Nigeria. Toyin Falola is the Jacob and Frances Sanger Mossiker Chair in the Humanities and University DistinguishedTeaching Professor at the University of Texas at Austin; Ogechukwu Ezekwem is a PhD student in the Department of History, University of Texas at Austin.
Book
Nigeria is Africa’s most populous country and the world’s eighth largest oil producer, but its success has been undermined in recent decades by ethnic and religious conflict, political instability, rampant official corruption and an ailing economy. Toyin Falola, a leading historian intimately acquainted with the region, and Matthew Heaton, who has worked extensively on African science and culture, combine their expertise to explain the context to Nigeria’s recent troubles through an exploration of its pre-colonial and colonial past, and its journey from independence to statehood. By examining key themes such as colonialism, religion, slavery, nationalism and the economy, the authors show how Nigeria’s history has been swayed by the vicissitudes of the world around it, and how Nigerians have adapted to meet these challenges. This book offers a unique portrayal of a resilient people living in a country with immense, but unrealized, potential.
Article
In the history of postcolonial Africa, no country has suffered a more tragic experience than Nigeria. After almost twenty years of gradual constitutional evolution by relatively orderly processes of conferences and negotiations, the structure of constitutional agreement collapsed; the army was broken into regional groups; citizens of Eastern Region origin fled much of the rest of the country during a series of massacres which produced a migration of hundreds of thousands of persons; the central government lost its effective authority over the Eastern Region; and when orderly processes of negotiation were suspended, the Eastern Region sought its own security and survival by declaring its independence, shortly after which the central government sought to reestablish its authority in the area by military action. The resulting war, which lasted two and one-half years, produced over a million casualties from military action, disease, and starvation.
Article
To understand the factors behind the formation of the Zikist Movement it is necessary to examine the political situation in Nigeria after World War II, which had stimulated national awakening to an unprecedented degree. Ideas of self-determination had taken root and various militant organisations had emerged—the trade unions, the ex-servicemen's unions, the Association of Market Women—each with its own grievances against the British colonial administration. These bodies, if properly organised and disciplined, could have become a powerful force in the struggle for freedom.
Article
In the past several years there has been a proliferation of studies on coup d'états in Africa and the political role of African military structures. Armies have been analysed in terms of their social and ethnic composition, training, ideology, and socialising influences. Intense debate has focused around the overt and covert reasons for their intervention in the political arena. Simple and complex typologies of civil–military relations and of military coups have been constructed; statistical data – both hard and soft – has been marshalled and subjected to factor and regression analysis, in order to validate general or middle-range theories of military intervention. And once in power, the officer corps' performance has been examined in order to generate insights into its propensity to serve as a modernising or developmental agent.
The Transition to Neo-Colonialism
  • O Segun
  • Osoba
Segun O. Osoba, "The Transition to Neo-Colonialism," in Britain and Nigeria: Exploitation or Development? ed. Toyin Falola (London: Zed Books Ltd., 1987), 239; Edwin O. Madunagu, The Tragedy of the Nigerian Socialist Movement (Calabar: Centaur Press, 1980).
Democracy Day: HURIWA wants Ban on Half of a Yellow Sun Lifted
  • Edwin O Madunagu
Edwin O. Madunagu, The Tragedy of the Nigerian Socialist Movement (Calabar: Centaur Press, 1980). "Democracy Day: HURIWA wants Ban on Half of a Yellow Sun Lifted," Point Blank News, May 28, 2014.