Available via license: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Content may be subject to copyright.
2018 SFA Annual Meeting
1
Thisopen‐accessarticleispublishedanddistributedunderthe Creative Commons Attribution ‐ NonCommercial ‐ No Derivatives License
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by‐nc‐nd/4.0/), which permits the noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction of thearticleinanymedium,
providedtheoriginalauthorandsourcearecredited.Youmaynotalter,transform,orbuilduponthisarticlewithoutthepermissionoftheAuthor(s).Forarticle
reuseguidelines,pleasevisitSAGE’swebsiteathttp://www.sagepub.com/journals‐permissions.
Article Title: Dynamic anterior shoulder stabilization using the long head of the biceps tendon: a
biomechanical study
Article Subtitle DAS: a biomechanical study
J. Mehl,1 MD, F. Imhoff,1 MD, E. Obopilwe,1 MD, F. Dyrna,1,2 MD, A. Lädermann,3,4,5 MD, P. Collin,6 MD, R.A. Arciero,2 MD,
K. Beitzel,2 MD, MD, A. Mazzocca,2 MD
1Department of Orthopaedic Sportsmedicine, Technical University, Munich, Germany
2Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Connecticut, Farmington, Connecticut, USA
3Division of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, La Tour Hospital, Meyrin, Switzerland
4Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
5Orthopedics and Trauma Service, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
6Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Privé Saint-Grégoire (Vivalto Santé), Saint-
Grégoire, France
Objectives: A new concept of dynamic anterior shoulder stabilization (DAS) combining Bankart repair with the
additional sling effect of the long head of the biceps (LHB) tendon to treat anterior glenohumeral instability has
recently been introduced. The purpose of this study was to biomechanically investigate the stabilizing effect of the
DAS technique in comparison to standard Bankart repair in different defect models.
Methods: Twenty-four fresh frozen cadaver shoulders (average ± SD: age 60.1 ± 8.6 years) were mounted in a
shoulder-testing system allowing 6 degrees of freedom. According to cross sectional area ratios the rotator cuff
muscles and the LHB tendon were loaded with 40 N and 10 N, respectively. Glenohumeral translation was tested in
60° abduction and 60° external rotation (ABER position) while forces of 20 N, 30 N and 40 N were applied. The
translation was measured using a 3D-digitizer and the total translation and the relative translation in relation to the
native starting position were determined. Maximal external and internal rotation after application of 1.5 Nm torque to
the humerus were measured. All specimens went through for 4 different conditions (Intact, defect, isolated Bankart
repair, DAS) and were randomized to 3 different defect groups (Isolated Bankart lesion; 10% anterior glenoid
defect; 20% anterior glenoid defect).
Results: Both surgical techniques resulted in decreased anterior glenohumeral translation in comparison to the
defect conditions in all defect groups. In comparison with isolated Bankart repair DAS showed significant less
relative anterior translation in 10 % glenoid defects (30 N: 2.6 ± 3.4 mm vs. 5.3 ± 4.2 mm; p=0.044) and in 20%
glenoid defects (40 N: 2.1 ± 6.6 mm vs. 6.0 ± 5.7 mm; p=0.035). However, in 20 % defects DAS led to a relevant
posterior and inferior shift of the humeral head in ABER position and to a relevant increase of inferior glenohumeral
translation. Both surgical techniques did not limit the rotational range of motion.
Conclusion: In the context of minor glenoid bone defects the DAS technique demonstrates superior results in
comparison to isolated Bankart repair.
The Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, 7(5)(suppl 3)
DOI: 10.1177/2325967119S00209
©The Author(s) 2019