ArticlePDF Available

Observations on the response of a pod of hippos to a dead juvenile hippo (Hippopotamus amphibius, Linnaeus 1758)

Authors:

Abstract

This note documents detailed observations of an adult female hippo and pod interacting with a dead juvenile (<6 months old) hippo within their aquatic habitat over the course of 11 hours.
Afr J Ecol. 2019;00:1–3. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/aje  
|
 1
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Received:2November2018 
|
  Revised:5M ay2019 
|
  Accepted:8May2019
DOI : 10.1111/aje.1264 4
NOTE AND RECORD
Observations on the response of a pod of hippos to a dead
juvenile hippo (Hippopotamus amphibius, Linnaeus 1758)
Victoria L. Inman1| Keith E. A. Leggett1,2
1CentreforEcosystemScience,SchoolofBiol ogical,Ear thandEnv ironme ntalSciences ,UNSWSydn ey,Sydney,NewSout hWales,Australia
2FowlersG apAridZoneRese archStation,SchoolofBiological,Ea rthan dEnvironmentalSciences,UNS WSydney,Sydney,NewSouthWales,Aust ralia
Correspondence
VictoriaL.Inman,CentreforEcosystemScien ce,Scho olofBiol ogical,Ear thandEnvironme ntalSciences ,UNSWSydney,Sydney,NSW2052,Au stralia.
Email:victoria.inman@outlook.com
1 | INTRODUCTION
Hipposaregregariousanimals,generallyoccurringaspodscompris-
ingfemalesandtheiryoung,adominantmaleandsubordinatemales
(Klingel,2013).The moststablerelationship in a podis between a
mother andher young(Klingel,2013). Withinapod, thedominant
malehasexclusivematingright sand hasbeenknowntocommitin-
fanticide,whichisthoughttoreducetheinterbirthingintervalofthe
female(Lewison,1998).Giventheirsizeandaggressivenature,adult
hippos have f ew natural pre dators; however, the sm aller juvenil es
aremorevulnerable(Klingel,2013).
Thereislittlepublishedliteratureonthebehaviourofhipposfol-
lowingthedeathofaconspecific.Theavailableliteraturefocuseson
rare occurrences of hippos consumingthe meat of a hippocarcass
(D orwa rd, 2015) .Re co r ds ofm amm als inter a c tin gwi thd ead con spe -
cificsinanepimeleticmanner(maintainingphysicalcontact,moving/
carrying,andprotectingcarcasses)areincreasing(e.g.Bearzi,Eddy,
Piwetz,Reg gente,&Cozzi,2017;Reggenteetal.,2016).Speciesdis-
playingthesebehavioursincludegiraffes(Bercovitch,2013;Strauss
&Muller,2013),elephant s(Douglas‐Hamilton,Bhalla,Wittemyer,&
Vollrath, 2006),nonhumanprimates (Cronin,Leeuwen,Mulenga,&
Bodame r,2011; Fashing et a l., 2011; Yang, Anders on, & Li, 2016),
andcetaceans (closerelativestohippos, Reggenteetal.,2016),and
reportscommonlyrelatetoafemaleinteractingwiththecarcassof
ajuvenile. There are photographs/videos showinghipposinteract-
ing with hi ppo carcas ses (Breen , 2010; Harris, 2014; Hipp o keeps
crocsfromdeadjuvenile,2008;Hippopotamus(Hippopotamusam-
phibius),2006;ViralHog,2016)anddefendingcarcassesfromother
animals (C saba, 2017; Harris, 2014; Hip po keeps crocs f rom dead
juvenile,20 08); providing anecdotal evidencethat hipposmayalso
displayepimeleticbehaviourtowardsdeadconspecifics.
This note do cuments det ailed obse rvations of a n adult female
hippoandpodinteractingwithadeadjuvenile(<6monthsold)hippo
withintheiraquatichabitatoverthecourseof11hr.
2 | METHODS
As part of a project investigating hippo behaviour, the observer
(Victoria Inman) regularly conducts fullday observations on hippo
pods.Theobservationsreportedhereoccurredfrom06:45to17:30
on 14 Septembe r 2018 at a hippo pool (17.82823°S, 25.02 928°E,
0.5 ha) in Chobe National Park, nor thern Botswana. The observa-
tionsweremadefromavehicleparkedapproximately50mfromthe
edgeofthepool,with the hipposbetween 50 and 160mfromthe
observerduringtheobservationperiod.Thebehaviour,movements
and time of in teractions were r ecorded as they occu rred; oppor-
tunisticimagesandvideoswerealsotaken.Binoculars(8×42,FOV
426ft)wereusedtoobser vethehipposwherenecessary.
3 | RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The pool where the observations occurred was known to support
apod of 24–26hippos (4 and 7 September2018).At 6:45 a.m. on
14September2018,itwas observed that therewas only one adult
femaleinthepoolandajuvenilehippocarcass,forwhichthecause
ofdeath was unknown.Weconsider it likely that theadult female
wasthe mother of the deadjuvenile,asit was the only hippo that
hadremainedwiththecarcass.Additionally,shewasanadultfemale
andhadenlargedmammar yglandsconsistentwithalactatingfemale
(Laws&Clough,1966).Othermembersofthepodwereinthemain
channelapproximately110metresawayfromthepool.
From 6:45 to 12:30, t he female alterna ted between movi ng
aroundthepool,interactingwiththecarcass,attackingandchas-
ingcrocodilesfeedingonthecarc assandforshor tperiodsoftime
restingin the water.The interactionsinvolvedthehippo pushing
the carc ass around t he water with h er muzzle (F igure 1.), lif ting
thecarcassoutofthewaterwithherhead,andt akingthecarc ass
inhermouthandmovingaroundthepool,divingandsubmerging
2 
|
   INMAN ANd LEGGE TT
(Figure 2; V ideoS1). Several ti mes the femal e shook the ca rcass
quite forcefully.Twice, the female cameto theedge ofthe pool,
partiallymovedontolandanddisplayedaggressionbyyawningat
the vehicle. This behaviour was unexpected as these hippos are
habituated to vehicles. The aggressive behaviour of the hippo
towards th e crocodiles ( VideoS2) i s also uncommo n; hippos and
crocodiles generally share this pool without conflict (personal
observation).Further evidenceof uncommon behaviourwas the
amountofsmallbubblesthehippocreatedasitmovedunderwa-
ter. The majority of hippo communication occurs amphibiously
(Barklow, 2004), and some sounds produce bubble streams
(Maust‐mohl, Soltis,&Reiss,2018). Throughout the morning,the
adult female vocalised three times, which garnered a response
fromhipposinthemainchannel.
Ataround12:30,sevenhippos(2adultmales, 2adultfemales1
subadultand 2 juveniles)moved as a groupon land from the main
channel to t he pool where t he original fem ale was. Norma lly,t he
hipposmovefromthemainchanneltothepoolearlyinthemorning;
however, on this day th ey appeared to h ave delayed their ar rival.
Whilst t he original female c ontinued to intera ct with the carc ass
(Figure3;VideoS3),asfarastheobser vercouldtelltheotherhippos
didnot.
From12:30 to 13:30, the original female continued interacting
with the c arcass, eve ntually pu shing it to a shall ow sectio n of the
pool,sothatthecarcasswashalfsubmerged.Immediatelyafterthis,
ataround13:30,allthehippos,includingtheoriginalfemale,moved
asa grouprapidlybacktowards the main channel (stoppingonthe
sandbankadjacenttothechannel).
Between13:30and 14:30, the group ofhippos slowlyandindi-
viduallyorinpairs walkedback to thepool. Five additionalhippos
joined,makingatotalofthirteenhipposinthepool.Thismovement
backandforthbetweenthetwoareaswasuncommonandpossibly
duetothepresenceofthecarcass.
For the rema inder of the obser vation period (14:45–17:30), all
thirteen hippos stayed in the pool. Initially, the other hippos had
limited interaction with the carcass, butthis gradually increased as
thedayprogressed.This rangedfromtouching thecarcass,pushing
itaround the pool,andtaking the carcass intheir mouthsandmov-
ingwith it. At thistime, it was impossible to distinguish theoriginal
observedadult femalefromthe later arrivals and thisindividualbe-
haviourwaslost.
Cannibalism in hipposhasbeen recorded(Dorward, 2015) and,
whilst therewere numerous times when different hipposhad the
carcas s in their mouth s, it was unclear i f any consumption of t he
FIGURE 1 Photographofadultfemalehippopushingjuvenile
carcassthroughwaterwithhermuzzle
FIGURE 2 Photographofadultfemalehippomovingwith
juvenilecarcassinhermouth
FIGURE 3 Photographofadultfemalehippopushingjuvenile
carcasstothesurfaceofthewaterwithherbody.Noteadultmale
inbackground
    
|
 3
INMAN AN d LEGGET T
carcass occurred. Invideos of hippos consuming meat, the hippos
movetheir mouthupanddownonthemeat inat ypical“chewing”
motionandlifttheirheaduptoswallow.Thisheadbackswallowing
motionhasbeenseennumeroustimesbytheobserverwhenhippos
eat aquat ic vegetation. N o hippo on this day w as observed to b e
doingthisaction; however,thepossibilit yof cannibalism cannotbe
disregarded.Uponconclusionoftheobservationperiod,thecarcass
wass ig nif ica ntl yd ama ge d ,w hic hc anp ro bab lyb ea t tr ibu ted to cr oc-
odilescavenging.
Thispaperprovidessupportforanothermammalspeciesexhib-
iting apparent epimeletic b ehaviours towards a dead consp ecific.
Theinteractionsthatoccurred,particularlytheadultfemaledefend-
ingthecarcass fromcrocodiles,lif ting the carcassoutofthewater
andmovingthecarcasstoashallowsectionofwaterbeforeleaving
it, are con sistent with other o bservation s in highly social ani mals
(King,2013).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank Elephants Without Borders for hosting this study and
theBotswanaMinistryofEnvironment,WildlifeandTourismforaf-
fordingusthe opportunitytoconductthisresearch.TheUniversity
ofNewSouth Walesand the AustralianGovernment are acknowl-
edgedfortheirsupportoftheproject.
DATA ACC ESSIB ILITY
Thedata(originalfieldnotes)thatsupportthefindingsofthisstudy
areavailablefromthecorrespondingauthoruponrequest.
ORCID
Victoria L. Inman https://orcid.org/0000‐0002‐5646‐7908
REFERENCES
Barklow,W.E.(2004).Amphibiouscommunicationwithsoundinhippos,
Hippopotamus amphibius. Animal Behaviour,68, 1125–1132.https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.10.034
Bearzi, G., Edd y, L., Piwet z, S., Reggente, M . A., & Cozzi, B. (2017).
Cetacean behavior toward t he dead and dying. Encyclopedia of
Animal Cognition and Behavior,1–30.
Bercovitch, F.B. (2013). Giraffecowreactiontothe death of hernew-
born calf. African Journal of Ecology, 51(2), 376–379. https://doi.
org /10.1111/aj e.12016
Breen,R. (2010).May 9.Hippo canabilism?(Okavango Delta, Botswana)
[Blogpost].Retrievedfromhttp://roarafrica.blogspot.com/2010/05/
hippo‐canabilism‐okavango‐delta.html
Cronin,K.A.,VanLeeuwen,E.J.,Mulenga,I.C.,&Bodamer,M.D.(2011).
Behavio ral respon se of a chimpanze e mother towar d her dead in-
fant. American Journal of Primatology, 73(5), 415–421. https://doi.
org/10.1002/ajp.20927
Csaba,X.(2017). September21.Hippo protects carcass from hungry hye-
nas [Video File].Retrieved from https://www.newsflare.com/video/
152993/animals/hippo‐protects‐carcass‐from‐hungry‐hyenas
Dorward,L .J. (2015). Newrecordofcannibalismin thecommon hippo,
Hippopotamus amphibius(Linnaeus,1758).African Journal of Ecolog y,
53,385–387.
Douglas‐Hamilton, I., Bhalla, S., Wittemyer, G., & Vollrath, F. (2006).
Behavio ural reac tions of eleph ants towards a d ying and dece ased
matriarch.Applied Animal Behaviour Science,100(1–2),87–102.https
://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2006.04.014
Fashing, P. J., Nguyen, N., Barry, T. S., Goodale, C . B., Bur ke, R. J.,
Jones, S. C. Z., …Venkataraman, V.V.(2011).Death amonggeladas
(Theropithecus gelada):Abroader perspectiveon mummified infant s
andprimatethanatology.American Journal of Primatology,73(5),405–
409.https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.20902
Harris,S.A.(2014).April7.Heartbreaking moment a mother hippo realises
her baby is dead. Express. Retrievedfrom https://www.express.co.
uk/news/nature/469120/Heartbreaking‐moment‐a‐mother‐hippo‐
realises‐her‐baby‐is‐dead
Hippo keeps crocs from dead juvenile(2008).Retrievedfromhttp://www.
wildlife‐pictures‐online.com/hipposighting.html
Hippopotamus (Hippopotamus amphibius).(2 006). Retrieve d from https
://www.arkive.org/hippopotamus/hippopotamus‐amphibius/im-
age‐G20273.html
King, B . (2013). When anim als mourn. Scientific American, 309,62–67.
https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0713‐62
Klingel, H. (2013). Hippopotamus amphibius common hippopotamus.
In J. Kingd on, & M. Hoff man (Eds.), Mammals of Africa: Volume VI:
Pigs, hippopotamuses, chevrotain, giraffes, deer and bovids(pp.68–77).
London,UK:BloomsburyPublishing.
Laws, R . M., & Clough, G.(1966).Observations on reproduction in the
hippopotamusHippopotamus amphibiusLinn.Comparative Biology of
Reproduction in Mammals,15,117–140.
Lewison,R.(1998).Infanticideinthehippopotamus:Evidenceforpolyg-
ynousungulates.Ethology Ecology & Evolution,10,277–286.https://
doi.org/10.10 80/0 8927014.1998 .9522857
Maust‐mohl,M.,Soltis,J.,&Reiss,D.(2018).Underwaterclicktrainpro-
duction by the hippopotamus (Hippopotamus amphibius) suggests
an echo‐r anging f unction. Behaviour, 155, 231–251. https://doi.
org/10.1163/1568539X‐00003484
Reggente , M., Alves, F., Nicol au, C., Freit as, L., Ca gnazzi, D., Ba ird, R.
W.,& Galli,P.(2016).Nur turantbehavior towarddead conspecific s
infree‐ranging mammals: Newrecordsfor odontocetes andagen-
eral review. Journal of Mammalogy, 97(5), 1428–1434. https://doi.
org/10.1093/jmammal/gyw089
Strauss ,M.K.,&Muller,Z.(2013).Giraf femothersinEastfricalingerfor
daysneartheremainsoftheirde adcalves.African Journal of Ecolog y,
51(3),506–509.
Viral Hog (2016) Januar y 13. Strange Hippo Behavior Part 1 [Video File].
R e t r i e v e d  f r o m  h t t p s : / / w w w . y o u t u b e . c o m / w a t c h ? v = U ‐ y v p 8 H q 1 e A
Yang, B., Anderson, J. R., & Li, B. G. (2016). Tending a dyingadult ina
wildmulti‐levelprimatesociety.Current Biology,26(10),R403–R404.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.03.062
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
Additional supporting information may be found online in the
Suppor tingInformationsectionattheendofthearticle.
  How to cite this a rticl e:InmanVL ,LeggettKEA.
Observationsontheresponseofapodofhippostoadead
juvenilehippo(Hippopotamus amphibius,Linnaeus1758).Afr J
Ecol. 2019;00:1–3. ht tp s://doi.o rg /10.1111/aje.1 26 44
... High profile examples include African elephants (Loxodonta africana) gathering around an ailing matriarch [20], and mountain gorillas (Gorilla beringei beringei) providing care for an injured juvenile orphaned during an attack by poachers [21,22]. In reality though, epimeletic behavior has been observed in a wide range of mammals, ranging from Barbary macaques, (Macaca sylvanus) [23], wolves (Canis lupus) [24], manatees (Trichechus manatus) [25], giraffes (Giraffa camelopardalis) [26], and hippos (Hippopotamus amphibius) [27], to lab-raised rodents [28]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Anthropogenic impacts on marine systems are increasing in frequency, geographic range and severity. While changes in climate will likely lead to the greatest impacts at the system-level, for marine megafauna, entanglement in marine debris also constitutes a pernicious threat. For baleen whales, in regions where high productivity and prolific fisheries overlap, entanglement is emerging as a component of their life history: In some of these regions, entanglement comprises the leading cause of serious injury and mortality. Additionally, up to 80% of whales carry scars indicative of entanglement, and associated declines in long-term health are reducing fecundity. Here, we describe behavioral traits seen in humpback whales during entanglement incidents. Specifically, we focus on reports of humpback whales that have remained in association with entangled whales during these incidents and apply the term “companion whales” in reference to these whales. Reports reviewed include a detailed account of a recent incident observed in Hawaiian waters, a compilation of 62 accounts of similar behavior extracted from 414 reports of entanglement events provided by regional entanglement response networks, and a series of six reports associated with whaling activities. The similarities between the current behavior of companion whales and behaviors observed during whaling activities suggest that this may be an example of behavioral plasticity, underscoring the expanding behavioral repertoire exhibited by baleen whales, and highlighting their potential resilience as they respond to the changing marine environment.
... Species justice views the rights and well-being of wildlife from a different perspective, taking the approach that rights should not be provided based on the notion of the value of a species to human beings but based on the sentience of the species with most being able to demonstrate an array of behaviours (Benton 1998). For example, hippos have been observed to demonstrate clear evidence of sentience with an array of behaviours including communication, distinct relationships between mother and calf, and reactions to death within a herd all being documented (Barklow 2004;Inman and Leggett 2020). A critique of current justice systems is they do not give equal weight to crimes against animals and crimes against human beings, this is in direct contrast to the principles of species justice and ignores the life and sentience of species (Sollund 2008). ...
Article
Full-text available
Colombian hippopotamus populations are increasing against the backdrop of general species decline. In addition to wider calls for further protection, this pocket population is considered an invasive species and is subject to ongoing legal discussions about how they should be controlled and managed. These proceedings currently consider two options: whether the hippopotamus population needs to experience yearly culls or to use a fertility management program. This article explores whether species justice has a place within the control of non-native species via this case study of the Colombian hippo legal proceedings. When reviewing this case, neither euthanasia nor fertility control are fully in the interests of the species; however, fertility control is more in line with their interests. The conclusion considers whether it is possible to recognise the interests of wildlife within species management and how a shift towards the interests of species and species justice at minimum could provide more dignified and harmless methods of species control as well as find alternative solutions which are more in the interest of the majority of parties.
... Data in other vertebrates remain scarce and physical contact with the dead appear to be more limited. In ungulates, some individuals may stay close to the body and sniff it (Bercovitch 2012;Mendonça et al. 2020), but reported exceptions include pushing and scent-marking the body in a peccary (Pecari tajacu) (de Kort et al. 2018), as well as protecting a carcass and lifting it out of the water in a hippopotamus (Hippopotamus amphibius) (Inman & Leggett 2020). In corvids, birds may gather around a carcass and call loudly, and some individuals may peck at it or attempt copulation (Iglesias et al. 2012;Swift & Marzluff 2018). ...
Article
Full-text available
It was long assumed that only humans can distinguish the living from the dead. Renewed interest in this question over the last decade has led several authors to assert that non-human primates are also aware of death. We investigate this issue by comparing the behaviours of monkeys and great apes toward helpless conspecifics, basing our analysis on published reports. We first examine the behaviours of mothers towards the body of their dead offspring. They may carry the corpse for days or more before abandoning it. They groom, inspect and protect it, sometimes allowing group members to explore it, and rare cases of cannibalism have been reported. No significant difference is observed in the way that monkeys and great apes treat the bodies of infants. We then examine responses to collapsed (still able to move and react) and inanimate (unresponsive or dead) conspecifics. Monkeys and great apes guard, care for and inspect their helpless partners, and also manipulate and mobilise them. Through these actions, individuals may inform themselves about the state of their partners, test their responsiveness and/or attempt to rouse them. It appears that only chimpanzees and gorillas show violent action such as display behaviours and the rough treatment of bodies. They can also make distress calls, and periods of “stunned silence” sometimes occur in chimpanzees, indicating that they are experiencing intense emotion. Finally, we argue that while both monkeys and great apes detect body dysfunction through the victims’ inability to wake up and move, only great apes can understand that something serious has happened. The signs of emotional disturbance reported in them indicate that they may believe that inanimate conspecifics have entered a state of “dormancy”, meaning that they are unlikely to regain wakefulness. However, there is no evidence that any non-human primates are aware of mortality.
... Our paper, along with an accompanying report of unusually prolonged carrying of dead infants by chimpanzee mothers at Bossou (Biro et al. 2010) attracted remarkable worldwide media attention, and generated new debates about what other species might know and feel about death. Together these papers probably helped to spark new life into the field of comparative thanatology, evidenced by a surge of publications on death-related reactions in a wide range of species, not only primates (e.g., Cronin et al. 2011;Fashing et al. 2011;Li et al. 2012;Stewart et al. 2012;Bezerra et al. 2014;Campbell et al. 2016;van Leeuwen et al. 2016;Yang et al. 2016;Porter et al. 2019), but also nonprimate mammals (e.g., giraffe: Bercovitch 2012; Strauss and Muller 2012;dingos: Appleby et al. 2013, hippopotamus: Inman andLeggett 2019). More detailed analyses are now being published, addressing topics such as physiological and psychological mechanisms underlying behavioral responses to the dead and dying, the extent to which other species might experience grief, how they differentiate between what is alive and what is dead, and what aspects of the "death concept"-which takes years to develop in humans-might be shared with nonhumans (Anderson 2011(Anderson , 2017 ...
Article
Although some definitions of thanatology-broadly definable as the study of death and dying-exclude nonhumans as subjects, recognition of the scientific value of studying how other species respond to sick, injured, dying and dead conspecifics appears to be growing. And whereas earlier literature was largely characterized by anecdotal descriptions and sometimes fanciful interpretations, we now see more rigorous and often quantitative analysis of various behaviors displayed towards conspecifics (and sometimes heterospecifics) at various stages of incapacitation, including death. Studies of social insects in particular have revealed chemical cues that trigger corpse management behaviors, as well as the adaptive value of these behaviors. More recent research on other taxonomic groups (including aquatic and avian species, and mammals) has sought to better document these animals' responses to the dying and dead, to identify influencing factors and underlying mechanisms, and to better understand the physiological, emotional, social and psychological significance of the phenomena observed. This special issue presents original short reports, reviews, and full research articles relating to these topics in New World monkeys, Old World monkeys and apes, as well as equids and proboscids. The range of events, data, hypotheses and proposals presented will hopefully enrich the field and stimulate further developments in comparative evolutionary thanatology.
Article
Invertebrates including insects have been shown to exhibit a variety of cognitive behaviors and physiological events that indicate interior states similar to human emotion. Therefore, our main question was whether insects have such capacity or not. To shed light on such questions we used the seed beetle Callosobruchus maculatus to investigate the behavior of the insects that were raised in complete isolation and had never seen any other conspecific and to see how they might respond when they encountered their live or dead conspecific for a short time (10 min) and then biological parameters and copulation behaviors were compared with the controls. Results showed that having a brief encounter with a dead conspecific caused different sex-specific biological and behavioral changes. Males who saw another live or dead conspecific and then did not mate during their lifetime had a shorter lifespan than males who mated once and those who had never seen another conspecific at all. A deprivation that insects didn't know about was less damaging. In males, sexual deprivation had a more substantial impact than perceived social deprivation. In contrast, encountering a dead conspecific increased female longevity. Males who observed a dead female body an hour before mating paid less attention to females when a female was put into their niches and male mating latency increased. Males also showed necrophiliac behavior. These results lead us to conclude that this insect experiences some type of cognition although it is too early to conclude in definite and it needs more investigation.
Article
Here, we describe the epimeletic behavior of an adult Risso’s dolphin towards a deceased newborn calf of the same species across several days with photographs, acoustic monitoring, and video recordings. Boat-based observation surveys were conducted from April 2014 to October 2021 along the southern coast of Galicia (northwest Spain) as part of a longitudinal study on the ecology of cetacean species. On September 21, 2020, an adult Risso’s dolphin was observed carrying a dead newborn calf in coastal waters. This presumed mother was further sighted with her deceased calf on September 23 and 24 (20 km and 40 km from the first observation site, respectively) and with other adult individuals on September 30, probably after having lost or finally abandoned the carcass. The presumed mother supported the corpse for at least 5 days, which may have had potential consequences for the female health. As direct observations are scarce in the wild, this type of report provides valuable information to better document the occurrence of care-giving behavior in highly mobile marine top predators.
Article
Full-text available
Documenting the behavioural repertoire of an animal species is important for understanding that species' natural history. Many behaviours such as mating, parturition and death may be observed only rarely in the wild due to the low frequency of occurrence, short duration and the species' elusiveness. Opportunistic documentation of rare behaviours is therefore valuable for deciphering the behavioural complexity in a species. In this context, digital platforms may serve as useful data sources for studying rare behaviours in animals. Using videos uploaded on YouTube, we document and construct a tentative repertoire of thanatological responses (death-related behaviours) in Asian elephants ( Elephas maximus ). The most frequently observed thanatological responses included postural changes, guarding/keeping vigil, touching, investigating the carcass, epimeletic behaviours and vocalizations. We also describe some infrequently observed behaviours, including carrying dead calves by adult females, re-assurance-like behaviours and attempts to support dying or dead conspecifics, some of which were only known anecdotally in Asian elephants. Our observations indicate the significance of open-source video data on digital platforms for gaining insights into rarely observed behaviours and support the accumulating evidence for higher cognitive abilities of Asian elephants in the context of comparative thanatology.
Article
Full-text available
Nurturant behavior toward dead conspecifics has been documented in several free-ranging marine and terrestrial mammals but still remains undocumented and poorly understood for most species. This study describes observations of adults carrying dead calves and juveniles in 7 odontocetes (toothed cetaceans) species and discusses the subject in mammals in general. Observations are based on 14 events from 3 oceans and constitute the 1st records for Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops aduncus), spinner dolphins (Stenella longirostris), killer whales (Orcinus orca), Australian humpback dolphins (Sousa sahulensis), and sperm whales (Physeter macrocephalus), as well as presenting additional records for Risso's dolphins (Grampus griseus) and short-finned pilot whales (Globicephala macrorhynchus). Information on how the adults supported and carried the dead conspecifics, on the gender of both adults and dead young, and on the age class of the dead young, is presented. Moreover, a comparison with terrestrial mammals, including a compilation of published literature, and a discussion on possible hypotheses to explain this particular type of behavior are given. The present study helps to corroborate that adults mourning their dead young is a common and globally widespread behavior in long-lived and highly sociable/cohesive species of mammals.
Article
Common hippos (Hippopotamus amphibius) live in murky waters and produce a variety of acoustic signals including underwater click trains considered to be social in function. We tested the hypothesis that click trains may function for underwater detection. We used observational and experimental methods involving 16 captive hippos to document the occurrence of click trains in different contexts and describe the acoustic parameters of the clicks. Male and female hippos produced click trains correlated with searching underwater for food items placed in their pools. Males produced click trains when alone supporting the hypothesis that these signals function for detection and are not only social in function. The frequency bandwidth of individual clicks varied and most were below 10 000 Hz. Click train production by hippos during underwater searches suggests a rudimentary form of echo-ranging that may function when other sensory systems are limited in their aquatic environment. © 2018
Article
Responses of nonhuman species to dying and dead conspecifics range from hard-wired, fixed-action patterns - as in social insects - to varied, flexible behaviors with cognitive and emotional correlates - as in some larger-brained mammals [1,2]. Comparative thanatology addresses issues that include empathy, compassion, and conceptual understanding of death across species [1-3]. Several aspects of how great apes react to illness, injury and death of others recall human behavior in comparable situations [1-5]. However, the extent to which more distantly related primates share these responses is largely unknown. Here, we describe behaviors shown toward a dying adult female in wild Sichuan snub-nosed monkeys (Rhinopithecus roxellana) [6] and argue that empathy and compassion surrounding death extend beyond humans and their closest evolutionary relatives.
Article
The extent to which elephants hold behavioural traits in common with human beings is relevant to the ethics of how we treat them. Observations show that elephants, like humans, are concerned with distressed or deceased individuals, and render assistance to the ailing and show a special interest in dead bodies of their own kind. This paper reports helping and investigative behaviour of different elephants and their families towards a dying and deceased matriarch. We make use of long-term association records, GPS tracking data and direct observations. Records made around the time of death, shows that the helping behaviour and special interest exhibited was not restricted to closely related kin. The case is made that elephants, like human beings, can show compassionate behaviour to others in distress. They have a general awareness and curiosity about death, as these behaviours are directed both towards kin and non-related individuals.